1 PB 1
1 PB 1
ABSTRACT
ARTICLE INFO
Introduction: The quality of service at health facilities needs to be improved, one
of the main keys is the service provided by health workers. Objective: The aim of
HOW TO CITED:
this systematic review was to analyze the effectiveness of knowledge management
Ayatulloh, D., Nursalam, N., in healthcare. Methods: The systematic review was carried out in March-April 2020
& Kurniawati, N. D. (2021).
The Effect of Knowledge
with a range of article search times from 2016-2020 using 5 electronic databases
Management in Healthcare (Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, CINAHL and ProQuest). The Center for Review
Services: A Systematic and Dissemination and the Joanna Briggs Institute Guideline were used to assess the
Review. Jurnal Pendidikan quality and PRISMA's checklist for this review guide. The literature search
Keperawatan Indonesia. 7(1),
p. 84-96
described four keyword groups based on Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) and the
search description was (knowledge management*' OR 'SECI knowledge
DOI: management') AND ('health care' OR hospital). Result: The article searched was
10.17509/jpki.v7i1.35132 found 13 articles suitable with the eligibility criteria, the results of the systematic
review found that knowledge management had the effectiveness to provide
information and knowledge processes, improve decision-making abilities, improve
ARTICLE HISTORY: performance and quality of health services and increase organizational
Received
effectiveness. Discussion: As health service providers, hospitals and other health
June 11, 2021 care institutions must continue to improve the quality of services. By improving the
quality of services, it is expected to be able to answer the demands of the community
Revised
June 26, 2021 to always provide optimal health services. With the application of good knowledge
management, ideas and creativity from the workforce will be created in creating
Accepted
June 29, 2021
health service innovations.
Published Keywords: Health Care, Knowledge Management, Quality Services
June 30, 2021
1. ABSTRAK
Pendahuluan: Kualitas pelayanan di fasilitas kesehatan perlu ditingkatkan, salah
satu kunci utamanya adalah pelayanan yang diberikan oleh tenaga kesehatan.
Tujuan: Tujuan dari tinjauan sistematis ini adalah untuk menganalisis efektivitas
manajemen pengetahuan dalam perawatan kesehatan. Tinjauan sistematis
dilakukan pada bulan Maret-April 2020 dengan rentan waktu pencarian artikel
adalah 2016-2020 menggunakan 5 database elektronik (Scopus, PubMed, Science
Direct, CINAHL dan ProQuest). Center for Review and Dissemination dan Joanna
Briggs Institute Guideline digunakan untuk menilai kualitas dan daftar periksa
PRISMA untuk panduan ulasan ini. Pencarian literatur menggambarkan empat
kelompok kata kunci berdasarkan Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) dan deskripsi
pencarian adalah (manajemen pengetahuan*' ATAU 'manajemen pengetahuan
SECI') AND (efek ATAU dampak ATAU) DAN ('perawatan kesehatan' ATAU rumah
sakit). Hasil: Artikel yang dicari ditemukan 13 artikel yang sesuai dengan kriteria
kelayakan, hasil tinjauan sistematis menemukan bahwa manajemen pengetahuan
memiliki efektivitas untuk memberikan informasi dan proses pengetahuan,
meningkatkan kemampuan pengambilan keputusan, meningkatkan kinerja dan
84
Ayatulloh, D., Nursalam, N., & Kurniawati, N. D. | The Effect of Knowledge Management in Healthcare Services:…
kualitas pelayanan kesehatan dan meningkatkan organisasi efektivitas. Diskusi: Sebagai penyelenggara pelayanan
kesehatan, rumah sakit dan institusi pelayanan kesehatan lainnya harus terus meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan.
Dengan peningkatan mutu pelayanan diharapkan mampu menjawab tuntutan masyarakat untuk selalu memberikan
pelayanan kesehatan yang optimal. Dengan penerapan manajemen pengetahuan yang baik akan tercipta ide dan
kreativitas dari tenaga kerja dalam menciptakan inovasi pelayanan kesehatan.
quantity, responsibility and ability of health Analysis (PRISMA) checklist to determine study
workers. Knowledge management is a process to options and the Center for Review and
seek, find and share knowledge (skills, skills, Dissemination and the Joanna Briggs Institute
experiences and networks) possessed by (JBI) Guideline as a guide in assessing study
individuals in an organization to their quality. The PICOS question format (P =
organizations and other individuals within the population, I = intervention, C = comparison, O =
organization (Kim & Han, 2019; Shamim et al., outcome, S = study type) was used as the search
2019). Based on the results of research conducted strategy in the review questions described in Table
by (Mohan & Gomathi, 2015; Nursing and 1. We searched for relevant articles that matched
Midwifery Council, 2018), it shows that this the review in March-April 2020 with a vulnerable
knowledge management approach can make article search time of 2016-2020 using 5 electronic
nurses' performance more optimal and in databases (Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct,
accordance with organizational goals. So that, CINAHL and ProQuest) to find articles relevant to
researchers are interested in doing a systematic the review. We also included manual searches for
review to find out the Effect of Knowledge bibliographic references of selected articles and
Management in Healthcare Services. gray literature databases to minimize publication
bias. The literature search described four keyword
METHODS groups based on Medical Subject Heading (MeSH)
and the search description was (knowledge
Literature Search Strategy management*' OR 'knowledge management
The literature review strategy used the SECI') AND (effect OR impact OR) AND ('health
protocol and recommendations from the Preferred care' OR hospital). The complete search strategy in
Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta- this review is shown in Figure 1.
Outcome
Screening based on abstract identification Did not discuss interventions for knowledge
(n = 42) management impact (n = 9)
Exclusion (n = 24)
Populations
Does not focus on health care services (n = 4)
Assessment based on full text and eligibility
criteria (n = 18) Intervention
Intervention is not appropriate / specific with
knowledge management (n = 10)
Outcome
Articles that are suitable and can be used Did not discuss interventions for knowledge
(n = 13) management impact (n = 10)
and sample characteristics, country and one studies used descriptive study. Based on these
psychological intervention divided into online and results and the JBI Critical Appraisal checklist can
offline intervention. be seen in Table 2, the study that have score more
than 50% passed the screening risk of bias. The risk
RESULT of bias assessment in the study showed because
The study quality of each article designated most of the determination of sample size is
as the source of systematic review was determined included by non-probability techniques, the pre-
based on the quality analysis of The JBI Critical experimental design is conducted in only one
Appraisal Tools and 13 studies that met the criteria group and the results are observed before and after
for this systematic review, the results obtained the intervention is given. The high risk of bias is
were three studies used cross-sectional study, three also due to the existence of several other factors
studies used qualitative case study, three studies that contribute to the psychology of each
used quasi-experimental research design, two individual, thus becoming a confounding factor in
studies used mixed-method research design, one the study. All studies included in systematic
studies used research and development design and reviews are showed in Table 2.
12. (Jang, In-Sook · 184 nurses Descriptive study 1. Increase decision making Five General
Park, 2016) ability Hospitals Daejeon,
Korea
13. (Wahyanto et al., 10 nurses consist of Mixed-method 1. Improve Quality of Muji Rahayu
2019) Head of Medical research design Nursing Care Hospital
Service, Nursing
Coordinator and
Inpatient Coordinator
of health services, more than 40% of the data conducted by (Jang, In-Sook · Park, 2016) show
indicate that they have problems with improving that knowledge management is one of the most
the quality of health services and employee important factors in decision making.
performance, thus requiring knowledge
management interventions. Improve the performance
The research results conducted by
Providing Information and Knowledge Process (Fadhillah et al., 2018, 2020) found that the
Based on research conducted by performance of nurses in implementing patient
(Känsäkoski, 2017) knowledge management safety in the control group who had been given
makes a person manage and identify a type of SECI knowledge management intervention with a
information in decision making, so that it impacts caring approach was better and more significant
the policy-making process and the decisions they than the control group. In this study, it was shown
take to be more responsible and meet future that in developing a nurse performance model
challenges. based on SECI knowledge management with a
The research results conducted by (Tian et caring approach, the work factor was the main
al., 2018) that knowledge management will factor that contributed highly to the nurse's
improve the transfer and transmission of performance. This shows that knowledge
knowledge from each employee. Knowledge management has a positive effect on nurse
management also makes employees feel learning performance.
and support from the organization, so they are The research results conducted by (Hendriks
more effective in sharing information, knowledge et al., 2016) found that tacit knowledge on
and experiences of other employees. In addition, knowledge management (insight and capacity to
employees will not worry or fear about the bad understand work processes) is a significant and it
possibilities that will occur in their work careers showed as a predictor of high nurse performance.
because the transfer of knowledge between The research results conducted by (Kurniawan,
employees makes them more active in their work 2017) show that social interaction skills,
and it will have an impact on their promotions. technological capabilities and knowledge
management are the most important factors for
Improve Decision Making Ability hospitals to improve management capabilities and
Based on research conducted by employee performance.
(Känsäkoski, 2017) it was found that knowledge
management makes a person manage and identify Improving the Quality of Health Services
a type of information in decision making so that it The research result conducted by (Ajanaku,
has an impact on the policy-making process and the 2018) showed that knowledge management makes
decisions they take to be more responsible and an important and effective contribution in
meet future challenges. The study result (Bahar & providing good health services. The contribution
Bahri, 2017) show that knowledge management such as awareness about management practices in
makes someone evaluate previous decision making hospitals, assisting nursing administrators, health
to assess the significance or quality of the results policy makers and utilizing knowledge-based
of these decisions. This evaluation is very resources in nursing care in Nigeria. It can
important because it is to clarify whether a decision conclude that the productivity and quality health
has been effective or not, so that the decision services can be improved. The patient safety model
avoids negative consequences. The knowledge based on Organizational Citizenship Behavior
management helps improve existing knowledge, (OCB) and knowledge management has proven to
before making decisions and ensuring that they be effective in reducing the incidence of decubitus
make the best choice. The results of research ulcers in inpatient rooms, in the sense that this