HRM Asm 2 Official 1
HRM Asm 2 Official 1
This statement should be completed and signed by the student(s) participating in preparation
of the assignment.
Further information relating to the penalties for plagiarism, which range from a notation on
your student file to expulsion from the University, is contained in Regulation 6.1.1 ‘Student
Discipline’ www.rmit.edu.au/browse;ID=11jgnnjgg70y and Academic Policy: ‘Plagiarism’
www.rmit.edu.au/browse;ID=sg4yfqzod48g1.
Table of Contents
Frequently used abbreviation forms:.........................................................................................4
Executive Summary..................................................................................................................5
1. Introduction.......................................................................................................................5
1.2 Company profile..............................................................................................................6
1.3 HRM roles in business......................................................................................................6
2. HRM Practices of the Company evaluation........................................................................7
3. Problem Statement:...............................................................................................................9
3.1: Employee Engagement problem statement......................................................................9
3.2: Leadership problem statement:.......................................................................................9
4. Literature review.................................................................................................................10
4.1: Employee engagement literature review:.......................................................................10
4.2 Leadership 4.0 motivation..............................................................................................12
5. Recommendation.................................................................................................................13
5.1 Solution for Employee Engagement................................................................................13
A missing jigsaw for the EE of K+N..........................................................................13
Employees engagement in the Covid 19.....................................................................14
5.2 Solution for Leadership Practice....................................................................................15
The 3608 feedback....................................................................................................15
Evidence-Based Leadership Training Program.........................................................16
6. Conclusion..........................................................................................................................16
7. Appendix:............................................................................................................................17
8. References...........................................................................................................................18
This report is aimed to deliver a wholesome perspective toward the human resource at K+N.
Particularly, it is about employee engagement and leadership practices. In the beginning, the
paper provides information that unlock the business origin of K+N, which has 120 years of
establishment and offers a variety of logistics services. In addition, it pointed out that HRM
in business plays a strategic role rather than a department like before.
In the following stage, the paper takes a chance to deeply analyze the 4 practices:
(1) workplace diversity and inclusion, (2) employee development and training, (3)
performance management and (4) occupational health and safety together with their strengths
and weaknesses.
Not to mention, there is a problem statement that refers to 2 questions. Regarding the EE,
there are 3 key findings: the positive responsiveness of employees is one of the most
important criteria that is related to EE. Second, K+N is evaluated to be well-performed with a
lot of equipment in technology and create meaningful activities. Thirdly, the Covid 19 has
changed nature EE more than ever when work-from-home is a trend. However, there is a
minor problem in which lack of mental health of workers is found at the working aspect that
leads to change. Refer to leadership practices, K+N points out that communication between
seniors and their subordinates is the key for growing. Second, it discusses leadership
motivation in the 4.0 era. Later, literature review is embedded after that to deeply understand
about the two issues. Lastly, the recommendation comes up after the literature review to ease
the stated problems about the EE and leadership in practices. About the EE’s problem,
regarding lack of mental health, the ASSET model is applied. Second, to tackle the impact of
Covi19 on EE, various options at coaching, rewards are urged to implement to maintain the
communication bond and EE at KN in the Covid 19 time as well. In the second question
about leadership, the proposal of 3608 feedbacks is introduced to increase the efficiency in
leadership. Second, the solution of Evidence-Based Leadership Training Program is there to
foster the culture of gratitude or collaboration the in the end, to enhance the leadership
practices at K+N
1. Introduction
This paper will mainly focus on analysing the strategic role of Human Resource
Management within the Kuehne Nagel organization based on two provided questions.
Specifically, Employee Engagement and Leadership Practices will be taken into
consideration by pointing out the current practices that the company has evaluated and
identifying the problems that related to human evolution such as employees’ well-being and
leadership advancement in the 21st century. Moreover, recommendations are also provided
based on theoretical assumptions in order to not only improve the business performance in
the organization but also motivate the employees to work harder via leadership practices in
4.0 Industry.
Founded by August Kuehne and Friedrich Nagel in 1980, Kuehne+Nagel has been
gradually recognized as one of the top world’s leading integrated logistics providers (Supply
Chain Digital 2020). Headquartered in Feusisberg, Switzerland, with more than 120 years in
the industry, Kuehne+Nagel has expanded its business from a traditional international freight
forwarder to a leading global logistics operations by providing innovative and fully integrated
supply chain solutions for over 100 countries in the world with approximately 76,000
employees (Kuehne+Nagel 2021). Sea Freight, airfreight, contract logistics, and overland
business are the four main market positions of Kuehne+Nagel, in which the Seafreight is
considered as the most dominant market compared to the other rivals (Kuehne+Nagel 2021).
By putting all their dedication, integration and innovation into the organization,
Kuehne+Nagel aims to improve their customer's performance based on their needs by
providing their best integrated logistics solutions through people, expertise, and technology
(Comparably 2021)
1.3 HRM roles in business
As mentioned above, based on outstanding HRM strategies, the company can generate
tangible and intangible value based on their employee engagement and leadership practice,
which can be seen as a significant contribution to the company’s performance. Therefore, this
table below will take a closer look at K+N's latest HRM practices as well as point out the
strengths and weaknesses of this company.
Table 1A: Evaluation of Kuehne+Nagel
3. Problem Statement:
From the first question, there are three problems about Employee Engagement. They
are positive responsiveness, communication and in the Covid 19 time. These problems
strongly correlate with the HRM of K+N in specific.
First, it is found out that, at K+N many actions have been taken into operation to
enrich the positive responsiveness for employees, but facing minor limitation. Ms. Ha, who is
HR manager, strives to bolster physical strength for employees and enrich the happiness.
Regarding strengthening the physical, health talking with doctors is organized periodically or
available healthy fruit is always prepared to be served at the workplace (Kuehne Nagel 2021).
Second, KN attempts to create a healthy lifestyle that engages employees to participate in by
creating tem building trips, family day, and Vietnamese Women Day, or Loyalty recognition
program. Beside the bright sides of the wonderful company culture, K+N also face its
limitations at some point. Even K+N offers supportive tools for workers to be traced and
monitor their work performance, but the feeling of how fatigued and exhausted the
employees is left behind.
Second, as the curve of Covid 19 keep disrupting the business, the story of how
employee engagement could be implemented smoothly to fulfil work-from-home, which is a
must to companies due to lockdown.
3.2: Leadership problem statement:
Regarding the Leadership problem statement of K+N, communication, and leadership
4.0 motivation are the three main issues that highly affected the human resource management
of K+N. Ms. Ha has mentioned that communication between leaders and employees is one of
the main aspects that K+N aims to enhance the connection between the superiors and
subordinates and improve the performance of the organization.
The next pain point of K+N leadership was leadership 4.0 motivation, especially
during the Covid 19 pandemic. The new way of working - which is online to be specific, had
been revealed the critical nature of strong people leadership. To adapt to the current situation,
K+N had to reshape its leadership, they had identified its mission which is to determine the
future, employee and customer work as well as the new working method that appropriates
with the changes that occur in order to provide the best service to their customers. The main
issue with leadership 4.0 motivation begins with the working condition nowadays.
Previously, the leader has the chance to share working space with their subordinates, which
ease the process of managing, monitoring, and giving feedback for the clerks, however, those
tasks must be executed remotely in recent times due to the obligatory status of the society
during the pandemic time. Those factors contributed to the necessity of changing their
mindset and the way these leaders work.
4. Literature review
This section will gain some insightful and academic perspectives reflecting the stated
problems particularly and EE as a whole.
To evaluate the importance of EE to the business wheel, a poll of 656 CEOs around
the world stated that EE is one of the top five of the most crucial challenges of every
organization (Ram and Prabhakar 2011). Decades ago, the term EE was first stated by Kahn
(1990) which describes a status that employees show a mixture of commitment at work,
allegiance, ownership and productivity toward their role performance (Macey, W. H., &
Schneider, B. 2008; Ram and Prabhakar 2011). It is obviously not simple to form such a
finest combination; hence by looking deeper under the academic work, there are a few
obvious elements for accumulating the engagement of employees. (May, Gilson and Harter,
L.M 2004) pointed out that there are three psychological catalysts that affect EE of workers.
Figure 3: Framework of engagement Source: May, Gilson and Harter, L.M (2004)
5. Recommendation
As discussed above, this section will come up with a solution to increase productivity
and the most valuable goal in this part is still managing the engagement regarding work-
from-home at K+N as it was at offline mode.
To begin, it is surprising to acknowledge that work-from-home mode produces a
higher productivity level than in-house employees on both dynamic and even repetitive tasks,
and this matches perfectly with the business nature at K+N (DuBrin 1991; Bloom 2014).
Hence, to implement EE into WFH, there are some conditions that need to be matched.
The 3608 feedback, also known as multi rater feedback, is an effective tool to increase
the efficiency of leadership and management. The 3608 or "full circle" input mechanism
compiles feedback on an employee's leadership and management style from individuals all
over them, including superordinates, colleagues, and peers (Cacioppe & Albrecht 2000).
Personal leadership and management growth is the most common and potentially most
effective use of 3608 degree feedback. 3608 feedback is primarily used to recognize
developmental opportunities. Its participants may affirm their talents, recognize leadership
weak points, identify habits/behaviors/styles that could be negatively impacting others, and
confirm their developmental goals by evaluating various views of their leadership and
management style. The 3608 method assists individuals in focusing on and developing the
competencies correlated with good leadership and management (Wilber 1980). There is a lot
of evidence that managers' self-perception is skewed and that they appear to exaggerate their
own abilities as opposed to realistic success metrics and peer and subordinate scores
(Waldman and Atwater, 1998). It is important that 3608 feedback users consider what the
process is meant to do and whether the procedure is developmental or evaluative. The
feedback has real and concrete implications for the individual because it is evaluative (e.g.
promotion, salary increase). Applying 3608 feedback into K+N organization might enhance
the leadership practice especially in 4.0 industry.
6. Conclusion
To sum it up, this paper had gone through the Human Resource Management aspect of
Kuehne+Nagel. Employee Engagement and Leadership Strategies, in particular, would be
considered by highlighting the company's existing practices and recognizing issues relating to
human evolution, such as employee well-being and leadership growth in the twenty-first
century. Furthermore, proposals are made based on theoretical assumptions to boost not just
the organization's corporate efficiency but also to inspire workers to work better by
leadership activities in the 4.0 Industry.
7. Appendix:
Figure 3: Framework of engagement Source: May, Gilson and Harter, L.M (2004)
8. References
Baker, E., Avery, G.C. and Crawford, J.D. 2007, ‘Satisfaction and perceived productivity
when professionals work from home’, Research & Practice in Human Resource
Management.
Bloom, N. 2014. ‘To raise productivity, let more employees work from home’, Harvard
Business Review, January–February.
Bratton, J & Gold, J 2017, Human Resource Management, 6th Edition : Theory and Practice,
Macmillan Education UK, ProQuest Ebook Central database.
Cacioppe, R & Albrecht, S 2000, Using 3608 feedback and the integral model to develop
leadership and management skills, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, vol. 28,
pp. 390-404
Collins, J & Clark, D 2003, ‘Strategic human resource practices, top management team social
networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creating
organizational competitive advantage.’, Academy of management Journal, vol. 46, no. 6, pp.
740-751.
DeRue, D., & Ashford, S 2010, Who will lead and who will follow? Social process of
leadership identity construction in organizations, Academy of Management Review, vol.
35(4), pp. 627–647.
DuBrin, A.J. 1991, ‘Comparison of the job satisfaction and productivity of telecommuters
versus in-house employees: a research note on work in progress’, Psychological Reports,
68(3_suppl),
Esty, K, Griffin, R & Hirsch, S 1995, ‘A manager’s guide to solving problems and turning
diversity into a competitive advantage: Workplace diversity’, Boston: Adams Media.
Huang, T 2001, "The effects of linkage between business and human resource management
strategies", Emerald Insight, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 132-151. https://doi-
org.ezproxy.lib.rmit.edu.au/10.1108/00483480110380316.
Kaushik, M. and Guleria, N. 2019, ‘Employee relations and engagement during covid-19’,
EMPLOYEE RELATIONS, 2(3).
Kuehne Nagel 2019, Sustainability Report 2019, Kuehne Nagel International AG,
Schindellegi.
Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. 2008, ‘The meaning of employee engagement’, Industrial
and organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30.
May, D.R., Gilson, R.L. and Harter, L.M., 2004, The psychological conditions of
meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work.
Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 77(1), pp.11-37. morale and
profitability in their increasingly anxious workgroups’, Gallup Management Journal.
Morgan, J 2017, The Employee Experience Advantage, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken,
New Jersey.
Mullins, LJ & Driesum, RV 2004, Management and Organisational Behaviour 7th edn.,
Financial Times Prentice Hall
Oberer, B & Erkollar, A, Leadership 4.0: Digital Leaders in the Age of Industry 4.0,
International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 2018,
<https://ssrn.com/abstract=3337644>
Ojo, A.O., Fawehinmi, O. and Yusliza, M.Y. 2021, ‘Examining the predictors of resilience
and work engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic’, Sustainability, 13(5), p.2902.
pp.1223-1234.
Ram, P. and Prabhakar, G.V. 2011, ‘The role of employee engagement in work-related
outcomes’, Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, 1(3), pp.47-61.
Robison, J. 2009, ‘Building engagement in this economic crisis: How managers can maintain
Shelton, K 2001, ‘The effects of employee development programs on job satisfaction and
employee retention.’, The Graduate College University of Wisconsin-Stout Menomonie.
Ten Brummelhuis, L.L and Bakker, A.B. 2012, ‘A resource perspective on the work–home
interface: The work–home resources model’, American psychologist, 67(7), p.545.
Vance, R.J., 2006, ‘Employee engagement and commitment’ SHRM foundation, pp.1-53.
Waldman, D & Atwater, L 1998, The Power of 3608 Feedback, Gulf Publishing, Houston,
TX.
Wilber, K 1980, The Atman Project: A Transpersonal View of Human Development, Quest
Books, Wheaton, IL