Iphl Nqas Web Upload
Iphl Nqas Web Upload
Standards
for Integrated Public Health
Laboratories
2024
Reproduction of any excerpts from this document does not require permission from the publisher so long as
it is verbatim, is meant for free distribution and the source is acknowledged.
ISBN: 978-93-82655-37-4
List of Abbreviations
1 AFB Acid Fast Bacilli
2 AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
3 AMC Annual Maintenance Contract
4 AMR Antimicrobial Resistance
5 AoC Area of Concern
6 AST Aspartate Aminotransferase
7 BG Blood Group
8 BLS Basic Life support
9 BMW Biomedical Waste Management
10 BPHL Block Public Health Laboratory
11 BPHU Block Public Health Unit
12 BRI Biological Reference Interval
13 BSL-II Bio Safety Level-2
14 BT Bleeding Time
15 CB- NAAT Cartridge Based Nucleic Acid Amplification Test
16 CBC Complete Blood Count
17 CD 4/8 Count Cluster of Differentiation 4/8
18 CHC Community Health Centre
19 CHP Chemical Hygiene Plan
20 CLIA Chemiluminescence Immunoassay
21 CMC Comprehensive Maintenance Contract
22 COVID-19 Coronavirus Disease- 2019
23 CPCB Central Pollution Control Board
24 CQSC Central Quality Supervisory Committee
25 CRP C Reactive Protein
26 CSF Cerebrospinal Fluid
27 CT Clotting Time
28 DC Differential Count
29 DCIP Dichlorophenolindophenol
30 DEO Data Entry Operator
31 DH District Hospital
32 DQAC District Quality Assurance Committee
33 DQAU District Quality Assurance Unit
34 ELISA Enzyme Linked Immunoassay
35 EQAS External Quality Assurance System
36 ESR Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
xvi National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Table of Contents
1. Introduction, Objectives and Scope 01
2. Background 03
6. Certification Process 25
9. Bibliography 127
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 1
Introduction
Medical laboratory services are an integral part of modern medicine and are considered pivotal for the
clinical decision-making. Healthcare Diagnostic techniques have evolved tremendously over the years; in
earlier days, patient diagnoses were more dependent on signs and symptoms gleaned by physicians. Medical
laboratories have revolutionised the whole scenario, becoming indispensable to clinical practices. The
importance of laboratory services was highlighted during the global coronavirus pandemic, and the crisis
has further fostered the market size of laboratory services.
Medical laboratories or clinical laboratories offer a vast array of lab-based procedures, and it helps physicians
to confirm their diagnosis, check the progress of treatment, and manage patients more efficiently. Laboratory
services in public health institutes involve a wide range of parameter and different types of laboratory
tests. In public healthcare facilities, the tests performed by the hospital laboratories vary depending on
their services. Most commonly, Rapid Diagnostic Kit (RDK), basic haematology, including microscopy and
Biochemistry, are provided at the primary care level. While more advanced services, including microbiology
and histopathology, are provided in secondary and tertiary care institutions.
To cater burden of emerging infectious diseases, increased prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCD),
and current healthcare industry needs, it is crucial to strengthen the laboratory systems in the public health
sector. It necessitates catering to the patient's needs without much hassle and providing rapid, reliable,
and accurate test results cost-effectively. To ensure the accessibility, efficiency, effectiveness, and quality
of laboratory services Ministry of Health and Welfare, GoI supported establishing Integrated Public Health
Laboratories (IPHL) under PM-Ayushman Bharat Health Infrastructure Mission (PM-ABHIM). Indian Public
Health Laboratories (IPHL) are envisaged in 730 districts of States/UTs in a phased manner. It includes
establishing a network of integrated public health laboratories (IPHL) at the various levels (especially
regional, state, district, and block levels). IPHL provides hospital-specific, disease-specific laboratory
diagnosis and strengthens healthcare surveillance with quality-assured laboratory data. It also ensures the
integration of the district public health lab, human resource (HR), equipment, and infrastructure to avoid
duplication and disconnect.
To improve and sustain quality in public healthcare facilities and various programs, National Quality
Assurance Standards (NQAS) were launched by the Ministry of Health and family welfare, GoI, in 2013. In
the beginning, these standards were for district Hospitals, subsequently including, Community health centre
(both rural & urban), primary health centres (both rural and urban), Health and wellness centre – health
Sub-centre, Comprehensive lactation management centre, Adverse events following immunisation, etc.
NQAS aims to instil a culture of quality and safety in health systems by developing quality standards and
tools that are pro-public health, flexible, evidence-based, and current as per professional knowledge. The
NQAS standards are aligned with the national and international benchmarks defined by the Indian Public
health standards, World Health Organization (WHO) respectively. National Quality Assurance Standards are
accredited by the International Society for Quality in Healthcare (ISQua), Certification of Integrated Public
Health Laboratory against and quality standards for Laboratory services are an integral part of the NQAS
framework.
2 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
National Quality Assurance Standards aims to provide quality services to its users (patient and healthcare
providers), stimulate district and block-level public health laboratories to demonstrate competency, and
continually maintain and improve quality standards.
Objectives:
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories aim to:
• Ensure the availability of comprehensive, accurate, rapid and quality diagnostics services.
• Reduce errors in laboratory processes and improve the efficiency of the treatment.
• Establish and improve quality management systems, leading to high service standards.
• Ensure excellence in relation to the current knowledge and technical development in laboratory
functions.
Scope
The National Quality Assurance Standards (NQAS) for IPHL would be applicable to standalone IPHL in a
district or co-located with the District Hospital.
As per NQAS for District Hospital 2020 version, Laboratory standards and assessment checklist are part
of the Assessor’s Guidebook for a District Hospital. It includes quality improvement in sample collection,
transportation, testing, reporting and clinical decision-making for all the tests mandated in District Hospital.
NQAS-DH-2020 standards and assessor’s guidebook would continue to be applicable to such labs. which are
not converted into IPHL. While NQAS certification for IPHL will be mandatory for all the laboratories set up
providing diagnostic services as per IPHL guidelines.
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 3
Background
Laboratory services are essential and fundamental part of the health systems. It plays a vital role before,
during and after treatment. Lack of access to high-quality diagnostic tests may deprive the patient from
accessing life-saving treatments and reduce the opportunities to prevent onward transmission and spread
of diseases. Without effective public health laboratory systems, public health responses will be delayed, and
global health security will be threatened. Non-availability/sub-standard laboratory services in public health
facilities, forces the users to use private health facilities, which results into out-of-pocket expenditure and
financial hardships. Therefore, access to appropriate, high-quality laboratory support is vital in healthcare
service provision, including surveillance, disease prevention, and control programs.
To bolster laboratories' infrastructure and disease surveillance capabilities in India, integrated public health
laboratories (IPHL) are envisaged to be set up at district and block levels under Pradhan Mantri Ayushman
Bharat Infrastructure Mission (PM- ABHIM). IPHL aims to provide comprehensive laboratory support for
communicable and non-communicable diseases along with Haematology, Biochemistry, Clinical Pathology,
Cytopathology, Histopathology, Microbiology, and outbreak investigation support. The epicentre of IPHL will
be a district with defined upward (Medical college) and downward (block public health laboratories and
other peripheral laboratories) linkages. IPHLs mandate establishing networks at various levels of health
care for providing diagnostics for disease-specific programmes and integrating healthcare surveillance
supported by quality-assured laboratory data.
“Integrated Public Health Laboratory (IPHL)’ extends to a laboratory providing comprehensive services,
including infectious diseases diagnostics along with testing of haematology, chemical biochemistry,
microbiology, and pathology parameters with bio-safety level-2, all combined under one umbrella. IPHL
involves physical, functional and data integration of different sections of the district hospital laboratories.
• The physical integration includes establishing a central sample collection facility in a patient-friendly
location.
• The functional integration includes the operation of various vertical program sections as the coordinated
limbs of a single body, i.e., the district public health laboratory, in the process sharing space, human
resources and equipment, thus avoiding duplication and disconnect.
• The data integration will be through an integrated Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS)
to monitor the data flow under various programs, facilities, and departments to feed into the IHIP
platform for coordinated public health action.
4 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Various models of Quality of care have been implemented in the country to overcome these challenges.
However, none could cater for the particular requirements of public healthcare institutions in terms of
service delivery, viz., healthcare facility’s quality and standard compliance as per National disease control
programme, immunisation, outreach services etc. To meet the specific requirements, there was a need for a
Quality system which is pro-public health, and to fulfil the void, National Quality Assurance Program (NQAP)
was launched in 2013.
Under the ambit of the National Quality Assurance Program, Standards of Care for various levels of health
facilities, viz. District Hospitals, Community Health Centres (FRU), Primary Health Centres (24*7), Urban
Primary Health Centres, and Health and wellness standards-Sub Centre have need framed. The uniqueness
of the National Quality Assurance standards is its measurement system which has been uniformly built upon
Areas of Concern, Standards, Measurable Elements and Checkpoints. Standards under each level of healthcare
institution (DH/CHC/PHC/HWC) have been arranged under Eight (8) broad themes, namely, Area of Concern
viz. Service Provision, Patient Rights, Inputs, Support Services, Clinical Services, Infection Control, Quality
Management and Outcomes in the system. Depending upon the services provided in available hospital
departments, the quality of care using the NQAS departmental checklist is measured and improved. E.g., In
district Hospitals, a gamut of 21 departmental checklists is available, viz—emergency, OPD, IPD, Laboratory,
OT, ICU, and Labour room.
The standards of Quality of Care apply to fully functional IPHLs, located within the district Hospital or
as standalone. The existing laboratory checklists under NQAS DH will remain applicable to laboratories
providing district Hospital services only and has yet to upgrade to IPHL. Once the laboratory in the district
hospital increases its scope as per IPHL, it can apply separately or along with DH NQAS for IPHL certification.
1 https://qps.nhsrcindia.org/quality-assurance-framework/operational-guidelines
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 5
Figure1: Represent the institutional arrangement under National Quality Assurance Program
It is envisaged that the district quality assurance unit and district Hospital level quality team will support the
IPHL quality circles to implement quality standards, find gaps, undertake prioritisation, and take up rapid
improvement activities (PDCA) for their resolution.
The District QA committee and the nodal officer responsible for operationalisation and monitoring of
IPHL will supervise the IPHL quality activities and will be responsible for setting targets, monitoring Key
performance indicators, and orienting staff for quality standards and its implementation activities.
NQAS for IPHL is broadly divided into 8 Areas of concern: Service provision, Patient Rights, Inputs, Support
Services, Clinical Services, Infection Control, Quality Management Systems and Outcome. 8 Area Concerns
has fifty (50) Standards and one hundred seventy (170) Measurable elements. The intent of each Area of
concern and the list of standards are enumerated below:
Service Provision
IPHL is pivotal in ensuring comprehensive laboratory services to the population in its catchment area. The
scope of IPHL is to provide routine district hospital laboratory services, diagnostic facilities for various
communicable and non-communicable diseases, including national programmes TB, for HIV, malaria, viral
hepatitis etc., and collecting and testing clinical specimens of human origin as well as samples of water, food
and air during outbreaks and reporting of that information in real-time as part of public health surveillance
systems.
The area of concern – services provision measures the availability of functional integrated diagnostic
laboratory services. “Availability” of functional services means; services are functional and are being utilised
by the end-users because the mere availability of infrastructure or human resources does not always ensure
the availability of the functional services. For example, as per staff, the facility may have functional NCD
services, but if there are hardly any diagnostic tests undertaken, it may be assumed that the services are
unavailable or non-accessible to users. Compliance with these standards and measurable elements should be
checked, preferably by observing the delivery mechanism of the services, reviewing the relevant records, and
checking outcomes after service delivery There are following two (2) standards and measurable elements in
this area of concern:
Patient Rights
Mere availability of services does not necessarily meet the need of the community, unless the available
services are accessible to the users, and are provided with dignity and confidentiality. Access includes
physical access as well as financial access. Evidence suggests that patients' experience and outcomes improve
when they are involved in the care. So, the availability of information is critical for access and enhancing
patients’ satisfaction. Area of concern Patients’ rights include parameters such as service availability without
a physical barrier, consent having, maintenance of privacy & confidentiality of patients and their records,
ensuring availability of mandated free services and provisioning of financial protection. There are three (3)
standards in Patient Rights area of concern.
Inputs
To provide required services in IPHL, it becomes pertinent to ensure the availability of requisite infrastructure,
equipment, instrument, human resource, consumables etc. So, area of concern: Inputs predominantly cover
the facility's structural part. Standards have been framed in concurrence with operational Guidelines for
Integrated Public Health Laboratories (IPHL) and Indian Public Health Standards (IPHS). While assessing
the infrastructure component, one may encounter the term –viz. ‘adequate’ and ‘as per load ‘has been given
in the requirements for many standards & measurable elements, as it would be hard to assess the stringent
infrastructural norms for the facility as that should be commensurate with the patient load. There are seven
(7) standards in this area of concern.
Standard C1 The facility has infrastructure for delivery of assured services, and available
infrastructure meets the prevalent norms
ME C1.2 Patient amenities are provided at sample collection area as per patient load
ME C1.4 The facility has infrastructure for intramural and extramural communication
ME C1.5 The facility and departments are planned to ensure structure follows the function/
processes (Structure commensurate with the function of the hospital)
ME C2.2 The facility ensures infrastructure in place for safe sample transportation
ME C2.4 Physical condition of buildings are safe for providing mandated lab services
Standard C3 The facility has established Programme for fire safety and other disaster
ME C3.3 The facility has a system of periodic training of staff and conducts mock drills regularly
for fire and other disaster situation
Standard C4 The facility has adequate qualified and trained staff, required for providing the
assured services to the current case load
ME C4.1 The facility has adequate specialist/qualified personnel as per service provision
Standard C 5 Facility ensures reagents and consumables required for assured list of services
ME C5.1 The facility has adequate reagents and controls at point of use
ME C5.3 Emergency drug trays are maintained at every point of care, where ever it may be needed
Standard C 6 The facility has equipment & instruments required for assured list of services.
ME C 6.1 Availability of equipment & instruments for diagnostic procedures being undertaken in
the facility
ME C 6.3 Departments have patient furniture and fixtures as per load and service provision
Standard C7 Facility has a defined and established procedure for effective utilization,
evaluation and augmentation of competence and performance of staff
ME C7.1 Criteria for Competence assessment and performance appraisal are defined for all
clinical and Para clinical staff
ME C7.2 Competence assessment and performance appraisal of Clinical and Para clinical staff is
done on predefined criteria at least once in a year
ME C7.3 The Staff is provided training as per defined core competencies and training plan
ME C7.4 Training needs are identified based on competence assessment and performance
evaluation and facility prepares the training plan
ME C7.5 There is established procedure for utilization of skills gained thought trainings by on
-job supportive supervision
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 11
Support Services
The support services are the backbone of IPHL, and desired clinical outcomes cannot be envisaged in
the absence of support services. Area of concern- Support services include maintenance and upkeep of
infrastructure & equipment; storage & dispensing of reagents and consumables, safety and security of
patients, visitors and staff and availability of water and power back for smooth lab functioning.
It also emphasizes, ensuring all requisite support to the linked BPHU and peripheral laboratories in terms
of capacity building, hand holding and monitoring, along with ensuring lab. fulfil all prevalent statutory and
regulatory requirements. Support services have total ten (10) standards.
Standard D1 The facility has established Programme for inspection, testing and maintenance
and calibration of Lab Equipment
ME D 1.1 The facility has established system for maintenance of critical Equipment
ME D1.2 The facility has established procedure for internal and external calibration of
measuring Equipment
ME D1.3 Operating and maintenance instructions are available with the users of equipment
Standard D2 The facility has defined procedures for storage, inventory management and
dispensing of consumables and reagents
ME D2.1 There is established procedure for forecasting and indenting consumables, reagents
and controls
ME D2.2 The facility ensures proper use and storage of consumables and reagents
ME D2.3 The facility ensures management of expiry and near expiry reagents
ME D2.4 The facility has established procedure for inventory management techniques
Standard D3 The facility provides safe, secure, and comfortable environment to staff, patients,
and visitors.
ME D3.3 The facility ensures safe and comfortable environment for service providers
Standard D4 The facility has established Programme for maintenance and upkeep of the
facility
ME D4.5 The facility has established procedures for pest, rodent and animal control
12 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Standard D5 The facility ensures 24X7 water and power backup as per requirement of service
delivery, and support services norms
ME D5.1 The facility has adequate arrangement storage and supply for potable water in all
functional areas
ME D5.2 The facility ensures adequate power backup in all patient care areas as per load
Standard D6 The facility ensures support to all linked labs as per service mandate
ME D6.1 The facility has established procedure for providing technical support to linked labs
ME D6.2 The facility has established procedure for providing capacity building support to linked
labs
ME D6.3 The facility has established procedure for providing information management support
using digital technology to linked labs and administrative authorities
Standard D7 Facility has defined and established procedures for Financial Management
ME D7.2 The facility ensures proper planning and requisition of resources based on its need
Standard D8 Facility is compliant with all statutory and regulatory requirement imposed by
local, state or central government
ME D8.1 The facility has requisite licences and certificates for operation of facility and different
activities
ME D8.2 Updated copies of relevant laws, regulations and government orders are available at
the facility
Standard D9 Roles & Responsibilities of administrative and clinical staff are determined as
per govt. regulations and standards operating procedures.
ME D9.1 The facility has established job description as per govt guidelines
ME D9.2 The facility has an established procedure for duty roster and deputation
ME D9.3 The facility ensures the adherence to dress code as mandated by its administration /
the health department
Standard D10 Facility has established procedure for monitoring the quality of outsourced
services and adheres to contractual obligations
ME D10.1 There is established system for contract management for out sourced services
The area of concern also ensures the services not available in IPHL are provided through referral labs.
in medical college or other linked laboratories, maintaining and updating the records using IT-based
management systems. Linkage of all the processes, from the collection of the sample to the delivery of reports
using IT platforms, ensures a reduction in common errors, and increase effectiveness and efficiency in the
laboratory functioning. There are a total of nine (9) standards that measures the quality of clinical services.
Standard E5 Laboratory has defined and established procedure for the post testing processes
ME E5.1 The facility has established procedure for reporting of result
ME E5.2 The laboratory has defined procedure for revision/amendment of the reports when
required
ME E5.3 The facility has established procedure for sample storage and its disposal
Standard E6 The facility has established mechanism for internal and external validation of
testing procedures
ME E6.1 The facility has established mechanism of internal quality control using quantitative
methods
ME E6.2 The facility has established mechanism of internal quality control using semi
quantitative/qualitative methods
ME E6.3 The facility has established mechanism of external quality assurance
Standard E7 Facility has defined and established procedures for maintaining, updating of
patients’ clinical records and their storage
ME E7.1 Adequate form and formats are available at point of use
ME E7.2 Register/records are maintained as per lab policy
ME E7.3 The facility has established computerised information system to support lab functions
ME E7.4 The facility ensures safe and adequate storage and retrieval of medical records
Standard E8 The facility has defined and established procedures for Emergency Services and
Disaster Management
ME E8.1 The facility has disaster management plan in place
ME E8.2 There is procedure for handling legal cases
Standard E9 Facility provides National health program as per operational/Clinical Guidelines
ME E9.1 The facility has established procedure for services under various communicable
disease programmes
ME E9.2 The facility has established procedure for services under various non-communicable
disease programmes
ME E9.3 Facility provides service for Integrated disease surveillance program/Integrated Health
Information Platform (IHIP)
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 15
Infection Control
The area of concern ensures laying down the infection prevention practices and their conformance. The
infection control pertains to monitoring basic infection control practices, ensuring compliance with hand
hygiene practices, and using Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), etc. It also covers standard practices for
maintenance of hygiene, sterilisation, and disinfectant as well as management of Biomedical waste, including
liquid waste management. Infection Control areas of concern have six (6) standards.
Area of concern-Quality management system covers aspects like the establishment of organisational
framework for quality improvement, measurement, assessment, and usage of patient satisfaction;
compliance to display and usage of work instructions; regular assessment using NQAS, and other monitoring
checklists for the improvement and sustenance of Quality system. There are nine (9) standards in the quality
management system.
ME G4.4 Planned actions are implemented through Quality Improvement Cycles (PDCA)
Standard G 5 The facility seeks continual improvement by practising Quality method and tools
ME G5.1 The facility uses method for quality improvement in services
ME G5.2 The facility uses tools for quality improvement in services
Standard G6 The facility maps its key processes and seeks to make them more efficient by
reducing nonvalue adding activities and wastages
ME G6.1 The facility maps its critical processes
ME G6.2 The facility identifies non value adding activities / waste / redundant activities
ME G6.3 Facility takes corrective action to improve the processes
Standard G7 The facility has defined, approved and communicated Risk Management
framework for existing and potential risks
ME G7.1 Risk Management framework has been defined including context, scope, objectives and
criteria
ME G7.2 Risk Management framework defines the responsibilities for identifying and managing
risk at each level of functions
ME G7.3 Risk Management Framework includes process of reporting incidents and potential
risk to all stakeholders
ME G7.4 A comprehensive list of current and potential risk including potential strategic,
regulatory, operational, financial, environmental risks has been prepared
ME G7.5 Modality for staff training on risk management is defined
ME G7.6 Risk Management Framework is reviewed periodically
Standard G8 The facility has established procedures for assessing, reporting, evaluating and
managing risk as per Risk Management Plan
ME G8.1 The facility has defined and communicated Risk Management framework for existing
and potential risks
ME G8.2 Periodic assessment for Physical and Electrical risks is done as per defined criteria
ME G8.3 Periodic assessment for Chemical and Biological hazard is done as per defined criteria
ME G8.4 Periodic assessment for potential disasters including fire is done as per defined criteria
ME G8.5 Risks identified are analysed evaluated and rated for severity
ME G8.6 Identified risks are treated based on severity and resources available
ME G8.7 A risk register is maintained and updated regularly to record identified risks, their
severity and actions to be taken
Standards G9 The facility has established system for patient and employee satisfaction
ME G9.1 Patient and Employee Satisfaction surveys are conducted at periodic intervals
ME G9.2 The facility analyses the patient feedback and do root cause analysis
ME G9.3 The facility prepares the action plans for the areas of low satisfaction
18 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Outcome
Measurement of the quality is critical for improvement of processes and outcomes. For the desirous
functioning of a facility, it becomes imperative to measure its indicators which can help in knowing the
productivity, efficiency, and utilization of the facility as a unit. These indicators not only show the “outcomes”
of the service delivery but also support the team to carry out improvement by implementing change ideas
as per the requirement. Indicators may be reported through a portal/ dedicated IT platform. Other than just
measuring indicators it is important to analyse the data for overall improvement using quality tools and
methods. Outcome areas of concern have total of four (4) standards.
Standard H1 The facility measures Productivity Indicators and ensures compliance with
State/National benchmarks
ME H1.2 The facility endeavours to improve its productivity indicators to meet the benchmark
Standard H2 The facility measures Efficiency Indicators and ensure compliance with State/
National benchmarks
ME H2.2 The facility endeavours to improve its efficiency indicators to meet the benchmark
Standard H3 The facility measures Clinical Care & Safety Indicators and ensure compliance
with State/National benchmarks
ME H3.1 Facility measures Clinical Care & Safety Indicators on monthly basis
ME H3.2 The facility endeavours to improve its clinical care & safety indicators to meet the
benchmark
Standard H4 The facility measures Service Quality Indicators and ensure compliance with
State/National benchmarks
ME H4.2 The facility endeavours to improve its service quality indicators to meet the benchmark
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 19
A robust quality management system, confidence in providing accurate and reliable lab results, better
operational control, and enhanced customer satisfaction are the principles of high-quality laboratory
services. There are numerous ways/standards defined to measure the quality in laboratories. Measurement
is the essence of any standards as it involves efforts to reduce subjectivity and ensure that all the critical to-
quality components have been addressed holistically.
Further, the endeavour to measure the Quality in public health laboratories is much more difficult, due to
the involvement of a wide range of vertical Programmes and implementation support available from states
and districts. It is realised that there would always be some kind of ‘trade-off’ when measuring the quality.
One may have small and simple tools, but that may not be able to capture all micro details. Alternatively, one
may devise all-inclusive detailed tools, encompassing the micro-details, but the system may become highly
complex and difficult to apply across Public Health Facilities.
Since the inception of NQAP, the country has realised the importance of measurement of quality standards.
Therefore, the Quality Framework and Standards are linked to the measurement system under NQAP. The
proposed system has incorporated best practices from the contemporary systems and contextualised as per
the needs of the Integrated Public Health laboratories and Indian Public Health standards.
IPHL
Checklist
Checkpoint
Mesurable
Elements
Checkpoint
Standard Score
card
Area of Measurable Checkpoint
Concern Elements
Standard
Checkpoint
Figure 2: Representing the Arrangement of AoC, Standard, Measurable element, and Checkpoints
The filled checklist would generate Scorecard, which will include an overall score for the IPHL. A scorecard
can also be generated with Areas of Concern wise and Standard wise scores.
20 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Standard B1 The service provided at facility are accessible and affordable 50%
Standard B3 The facility has defined framework for ethical management including
dilemmas confronted during delivery of services at public health 50%
facilities.
Standard C1 The facility has infrastructure for delivery of assured services, and
50%
available infrastructure meets the prevalent norms
Standard C2 The facility ensures the physical safety of the infrastructure. 50%
Standard C3 The facility has established Programme for fire safety and other
50%
disaster
Figure 4: Schematic representation of Standard wise scorecard
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 21
Checklists are the main tools for the assessment. Before undertaking any assessment, assessors should
familiarise themselves with the checklists beforehand. The layout of the checklist is given below:
f
Normalised Ratio
(INR), Activated partial
i
thromboplastin time
Availability of SI/RR Fibrinogen
Biochemistry Degradation Product
services (FDP) test, D-Dimer,
Coombs test direct
& indirect with titre, j
Sickling test for
g screening of sickle
cell anaemia, rapid
sickle cell test, DCIP
test for screening HbE
hemoglobinopathy,
G6PD enzyme
deficiency
(a) Title of the checklist denotes the name of Integrate Public Health lab for which the checklist is intended.
(b) The horizontal bar in grey colour contains the name of the Area of concern to which the underlying
standards belong.
(c) Yellow horizontal bar contains the statement of the standard being measured.
(d) Extreme left column of the checklist in blue colour contains the reference number of Standard and
Measurable Elements. The Reference number helps in the identification and traceability of a standard.
(e) Second column contains the text of the measurable element for the respective standard.
(f) The column next to measurable elements on the right side has checkpoints for measuring compliance to
the respective measurable element and the standard.
(g) Next right to the checkpoints, a blank column is available where the finding of assessment in terms of
Compliance (2 marks), Partial Compliance (1 mark) and Non-Compliance (0 marks) should be written.
22 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
(h) Next right to the blank column is the assessment method column. This denotes the ‘HOW’ to gather the
information. Generally, there are four primary methods for assessment - SI means staff interview, OB
means observation, RR means record review & PI, Patient Interview.
(i) Column next to the assessment method contains means of verification. It denotes what to see in a
particular Checkpoint. It may be a list of equipment or procedures to be observed, example questions
which may be asked to the interviewee or some benchmark, which could be used for comparison, or
reference to some other guideline or legal document. It may be left blank as checkpoints may be self-
explanatory.
(j) Next right to the means of verification, a remark section is given. It needs to be filled by the assessor
whenever partial or non-compliance is given.
Assessment Methods
Assessor should read measurable elements and checkpoints; and try to gather information and evidence
to assess the compliance to the requirement of measurable element and checkpoint. Information can be
gathered by four methods that is Observation (OB), Record review (RR), Patient interview (PI) and Staff
Interview (SI)
• Observations (OB) – Compliance with many measurable elements can be assessed by directly observing
the articles, process, and surrounding environment. E.g. Enumeration of articles like equipment,
reagents, consumables etc. Displays like signage, work instructions, and important information. Patient
amenities, chair, drinking water, complaint box etc. An environment like seepage, overcrowding, and
cleanliness. Procedures like measuring collection of samples, counselling, segregation of biomedical
waste etc.
• Staff Interview (SI) - Interaction with the staff help in assessing the knowledge and skill level, required
for performing job functions. Examples -Competency testing - Asking staff how to perform certain
diagnostic procedures. Demonstration – Asking staff to demonstrate activities like hand washing
techniques or newborn resuscitation. Awareness -Asking staff about awareness of quality policy and
quality objectives and Feedback about the adequacy of supplies, work safety issues etc.
• Record Review (RR) - – All processes, especially certain tests not performed regularly, cannot be
observed. A review of records may generate more objective evidence and triangulate the finding of the
observation. For example, on the day of assessment, regents, controls etc., may be available in adequate
quantity, but reviewing the expenditure register would reveal the consumption pattern of consumables.
Examples of record reviews are -Review of laboratory records for critical alerts, a culture report for
microbial surveillance, minutes of the quality circle meeting, safety audit checklists, risk assessment
and mitigation plan, reports of the mock drill, control charts- correction factor etc.
• Patient Interview (PI) -Interaction with patients & relatives may be useful in getting information about
the quality of services and their experience at the facility. It should include Feedback on the quality
of services, turnaround time, staff behaviour, waiting times, out-of-pocket expenditure, satisfaction of
clients/individuals etc.
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 23
Scoring System
After assessing
Scoring System all the measurable elements, checkpoints and marking compliance, the
department/
After assessing allfacility scores elements,
the measurable can be calculated.
checkpoints and marking compliance, the department/ facility
scores can be calculated.
Rules of Scoring
Rules of Scoring
2 marks for each compliance
2 marks for each compliance
1 mark for each partial compliance
1 mark for each partial compliance
0 Marks for every Non-Compliance
0 Marks for every Non-Compliance
Figure 6: Representing the Scoring rules
Figure 6: Representing the Scoring rules
All checkpoints have equal weightage to keep scoring simple. Once scores have been assigned to each
checkpoint, the Standard wise score can be calculated standard-wise by adding the individual scores for each
checkpoint. The final have
All checkpoints score should
equalbeweightage
given in percentage
to keepto compare
scoringit simple.
with otherOnce
publicscores
health laboratories.
have been
assigned
The to each
calculation of thecheckpoint,
percentage isthe Standard
as follows: wise score can be calculated standard-wise
by adding the individual scores for each checkpoint. The final score should be given in
The score obtained X 100/ No of checkpoints in checklist X 2
percentage to compare it with other public health laboratories.
Scores can be calculated manually, or scores can be entered into excel sheet given.
The calculation of the percentage is as follows:
The score obtained X 100/ No of checkpoints in checklist X 2
Scores can be calculated manually, or scores can be entered into excel sheet given.
Certi�ication Process
The NQAS for IPHL will be used as an assessment and certi�ication tool. Once the
laboratory substantially improves during internal assessment and achieves at least 70%
or more in NQAS assessment tools, it may become eligible for State & National
certi�ication. The criteria and process of certi�ication are explained below.
33
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 25
Certification Process
The NQAS for IPHL will be used as an assessment and certification tool. Once the laboratory substantially
improves during internal assessment and achieves at least 70% or more in NQAS assessment tools, it may
become eligible for State & National certification. The criteria and process of certification are explained
below.
a. District Quality Assurance unit/ facility level quality team will inform the State Quality Assurance unit
(SQAU) about its readiness for state assessments. The SQAU would verify the score and supporting
documents and initiate the process of state-level certification.
b. State certification may be conducted with the help of a team constituted of national assessors & internal
assessors available in the state. If the number of national assessors in the state is less, the Internal
assessor, along with a representative of IPHL (from another district- Pathologist/ microbiologist etc)
and a district/state consultant, can conduct the assessment.
c. On meeting all the criteria for state certification, the facility would be declared as ‘State level Certified’
by SQAC.
a. Once the IPHL is State Certified, the SQAC would send the application in the format given in Operational
Guidelines for Improving Quality in Public Health Facilities 2021, along with the requisite documents
to Director NHM, MoHFW, requesting the external assessment. NHSRC would check the application and
supporting documents before a team of assessors is deputed as per assessment norms.
b. The Certification Unit, NHSRC, shall coordinate the assessment process. The national assessor would
submit their findings, and a report is prepared, and submitted to MoHFW with recommendations for
certification.
c. NQAS certification of IPHL will remain valid for three years. After completing the first and second years
of the national certification, the state would organise a surveillance assessment. Its compliance report
will be submitted to the certification unit of the Quality & Patient Safety Division, NHSRC.
d. In the third year, Laboratories would be reassessed by a team of National assessors. In addition, National
Health System Resource Centre (NHSRC) and MoHFW may also undertake surprise assessments to
ascertain the sustenance of improvement activities.
26 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Certification criteria:
NQAS for IPHL applies to the laboratories where the facility for testing routine and public health-related
diagnostic facilities is in one place.
The certification criteria applicable to National & State levels is mentioned below:
National Level Certification: The national certificate is awarded by MoHFW, per the norms defined by the
CQSC. Detailed criteria for National certification are as follows:
Criteria 03- A score of core standards (A1, E3, E4, E5 and E6) >70% (An increment of 5% on every
Surveillance audit & Re-certification)
Criteria 05- Patient satisfaction score of 70% in the preceding Quarter or more or Score of 3.5 on Likert
Scale.
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 27
Award of Certification
(a) Certification: If the IPHL meets all of the above-mentioned five criteria.
(b) Certification with conditionality: If an IPHL aggregate score is 70% or more (Criterion I), and also meets
at least three criteria out of the remaining four (Criterion II, III, IV & V)
(c) Deferred: The certification may be deferred until follow-up assessments if IPHL’s overall score is 70% in
external assessment but does not meet the criteria for conditional certification.
Surveillance Assessment:
The State Quality Assurance Unit shall conduct annual surveillance for two years after attaining National
certification. State Quality Assurance Committee reserves the right to conduct more frequent surveillance in
case of complaints/concerns against the facility.
The facility has to submit a gap analysis report and a time-bound action plan to close the gaps found during
the National assessment & surveillance audit to the QPS team of NHSRC.
Re-certification:
To develop a culture of quality sustenance, the facility is expected to undergo recertification as defined in
Operational Guidelines for Improving Quality in Public Health Facilities 2021.
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 29
NQAS Checklist
for
Assessment of IPHL
30 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Area of Concern - A Service Provision
Standard
Facility provides Integrated Diagnostic Laboratory Services as per mandate
A1
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Availability of basic SI/RR GTT, S.Bilirubin (To-
Biochemistry ser- tal, Direct & Indirect),
vices S.Creatinine, Blood
urea, SGOT, SGPT, S.Al-
kaline Phosphatase,
S.Total protein, S.Albu-
min & AG ratio, S.Glob-
ulin, S.Total choles-
terol, S.Triglycerides,
VLDL, HDL, LDL,
GGT, Uric acid, S.LDH,
HbA1C, CRP, S.Electro-
lytes, Thyroid profile
Availability of spe- SI/RR S.Amylase, S.Iron, S.To-
cialised Biochemis- tal Iron binding capac-
try services ity, S.Ionised Calcium,
Arterial blood gas test,
Urinary protein, Urine
for microalbumin,
creatinine & protein,
Ferritin, Troponin-I/
Troponin-T, S.PSA, CSF
& body fluid analysis
Availability of Mi- SI/RR 1. Microscopy- Wet
crobiology services mount & gram stain for
RTI/STD, KOH mount
for fungal microscopy,
Slit skin smear, Gram
staining for clinical
specimen
2. Culture- Throat swab
for Diphtheria, Stool
hanging drop for Vibrio
Cholera, Blood/body
fluid culture, Urine/
other cultures, Diph-
theria culture, Culture
of stool, Bacterial
identification & AST,
Culture for coliforms,
Microbiological analy-
sis of Water (H2S test
for screening)
Availability of Cy- SI/RR FNAC, Pap smear, CSF
tology services & body fluid counts
cytology, Cell block
32 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Availability of SI/RR Histopathology, Tissue
Histopathology biopsy
services Give full compliance,
if processing of his-
topathology tests are
outsourced
Availability of SI/RR UPT, Urine test for pH,
Clinical Pathology specific gravity, leuco-
services cyte esterase, glucose,
albumin, bilirubin,
urobilinogen, ketone,
protein, nitrite, Urine
microscopy, Stool
for ova, cyst & occult
blood, Semen analysis,
Porphobilinogen
Availability of Se- SI/RR 1. RPR/VDRL, HIV 1 &
rology services 2, Widal, Leptospiro-
sis, Typhus, Measles,
Leishmaniasis, ASLO,
Rheumatoid Factor
(RA), Weilfelix
Availability of SI/RR PCR for influenza,
Molecular Biology/ COVID-19 & emerging
Virology services infectious diseases (as
and when required)
The facility provides Availability of lab SI/RR rk39 for Kala Azar,
Laboratory services services for vector ELISA for JE & IgG for
for communicable borne disease Chikungunya, NS1 &
diseases IgM for dengue, Malar-
ME A1.2 ia, Filaria, Dengue NS1
& IgM
As per the endemicity
in the geographical
area
Availability of lab SI/RR Microscopy for AFB
services for Tuber- CB-NAAT
culosis
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Availability of lab SI/RR Slit skin smear
services for Leprosy
The facility provides Availability of ser- SI/RR FBS, PPBS, RBS, HbA1c
Laboratory services vices for DM
ME A1.3
for non-communica-
ble diseases
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Facility provides Availability of SI/RR/OB 1. Mechanism/System
laboratory based sur- services for surveil- at place for surveil-
veillance services for lance of infectious lance & monitoring of
Infectious & Non-in- and non-infectious epidemic & endemic
fectious diseases diseases diseases
2. Check system is in
place to detect out-
ME A1.5
breaks by routine lab
investigations
3. Appropriate and suf-
ficient number of clin-
ical samples reached
to IPHL and etiological
diagnosis is made
Services are available 24x7 all lab ser- SI/RR/OB Check for:
for the time period as vices are available 1. Laboratory services
mandated are available at night
2. Look for number of
ME A1.6
lab tests performed at
night
3. Critical alerts are
informed at night
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 35
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Standard
Facility provides support services to linked spokes
A2
Facility provides tech- Availability of SI/OB 1. Sample collection,
nical support services technical support testing and referral
ME A 2.1 to Block Public Health services to BPHL 2. Functional linkage
Labs & other periph- and other peripher- with spokes
eral labs al labs
Standard
The services provided at the facility are accessible and affordable
B1
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Availability of OB 1. Directional signages
adequate and clear for sample collection
signages for sample area is displayed from
collection area the different part of the
hospital
-Give full compliance if
collection area is a part
of main IPHL
Signages are user OB 1. Signages and ser-
friendly & uniform vice information is
in colour displayed in bilingual
language including the
local language
2. Signages are visible
clearly
Restricted area sig- OB Access to authorized
nage are displayed personnel only
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Patients & visitors OB/PI 1. Test specific instruc-
are sensitised and tions are displayed
educated for testing 2. Patient/relatives
requirements are informed about
pre-testing require-
ments (If applicable)
3. Good lab practice to
have bilingual infor-
mation sheets/flyers
available for specific
test like urine culture
and lipid profile, F, PP,
GTT etc.
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
The facility has de- Availability of com- OB/RR 1.Complain box is
fined and established plaint box available in proximity
grievance redressal to IPHL/sample col-
system in place lection area/reporting
receiving area (may
be shared with main
hospital)
2. Process to complete
resolution of the com-
plaint is defined and
ME B1.5 displayed bilingual
3. Staff is aware about
complaints pertaining
to the lab & mechanism
of the complaint re-ad-
dressal
4. Lab ensures that
actions are taken
against the complaints
within the defined time
interval
Information about OB 104/state specific
complaint re-ad- number/ CM Portal
dressal is displayed
The facility provides IPHL provides free OB/PI As per the mandate of
cashless services as diagnostic services free diagnostic services
ME B1.6
per prevalent govern- as per guidelines/
ment norms/schemes state mandate
Check patient has OB/PI Ask patient randomly
not incurred any (At least 5)
expenditure on
diagnostics
Cashless investiga- OB/PI JSSK, Ayushman
tions for patients/ Bharat, applicable na-
beneficiaries tional & state specific
govt. schemes
Standard
The service provided at facility are acceptable
B2
Adequate visual Availability of OB Privacy is maintained
privacy is provided at screen/ partition at at OPD areas
ME B2.1
every point of care sample collection
area
Adequate privacy is OB IPD, Emergency & Crit-
maintained during ical areas
sample collection
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 39
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Services are provided Separate queue for OB 1. IPHL and sample col-
in manner that are female and special- lection areas / report
sensitive to gender ly abled patients receiving areas
ME B2.2
2. Give the full compli-
ance, if token system is
followed
Laboratory has OB
defined policy for
non-discrimination
on basis of gender
Confidentiality of Laboratory has sys- OB/RR 1. Lab staff do not
patients records and tem to ensure the discuss the lab result
clinical information is confidentiality of outside
ME B2.3 maintained for every the reports gener- 2. Special precautions
patient, especially of ated are taken for the test
those having social results of having social
stigma stigma like HIV, etc.
Laboratory Records OB General staff/visitors
are kept at secure do not have access to
place the lab reports
Ethical norms and Check code of con- OB/RR 1. Check for any circu-
code of conduct for duct is defined lar, policy, notice, gov-
medical and para- ernment order issued
medical staff have that explains the code
been established of conduct for staff
ME B3.1 such as specialists,
technicians and other
support staff
2. Check that updated
copy for code of con-
duct is available
40 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Check if staff is SI Check doctors and lab
aware of code of technicians are aware
conduct of code of conduct
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
RR sues like sample collec-
tion, transfer, testing,
resulting, disclosure
of information or any
professional conflict
which may not be in
patient's best interest
Standard The facility has infrastructure for delivery of assured services, and available
C1 infrastructure meets the prevalent norms
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
collection area) is
available in the central
Sample collection area
Laboratory space OB
is adequate for 1. Adequate area is
carrying out available for per-
activities forming tests, sample
storage, keeping equip-
ment, washing, steril-
ization, waste storage
before disposal, report
dissemination and
storage of reagents and
records etc. is available
2. Check testing areas
have adequate space
for sample processing
and there is no clutter-
ing of equipment at the
work stations
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Availability of sit- OB Check adequate sitting
ting arrangement in arrangement as per pa-
the waiting area tient load is available
in waiting area
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Designated washing OB 1. In the central sample
and waste disposal collection area
area 2. In sample processing
areas
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
The facility ensures Dumb waiters are OB Give full compliance if
infrastructure in installed to trans- sample is transported
ME C2.2 place for safe sample port the samples manually ensuring all
transportation from collection area the sample transporta-
to testing area tion protocols
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Adequate electrical OB (1) For safe and
socket is available smooth operation of
lab equipment.
(2) Check extensions
are not used to run
heavy equipment
Power Audit and OB/RR Check six monthly once
Earthing is done at least
regularly
Constant out put OB Automatic voltage reg-
voltage is provided ulators are installed
to the equipment
Facility has mecha- OB/RR by competent electrical
nism for periodical Engineer
check / test of all
electrical installa-
tion
Physical condition of Work benches are OB Check bench tops are
buildings are safe for chemical resistant impervious to water
providing mandated and resistant to mod-
ME C2.4
lab services erate heat, organic
solvents, acids, alkalis,
chemicals.
Floors of the Lab- OB
oratory are non
slippery and even
surfaces and acid
resistant
Standard
The facility has established Programme for fire safety and other disaster
C3
The facility has plan Fire exits with sig- OB The department has
for prevention of fire nage are defined to sufficient no. of fire
ME C3.1 permit safe escape exits with fire exit
to its occupant at signage
the time of fire
Check that the fire OB (1) Check that fire exit/
exits are visible evacuation plans are
and routes to reach displayed
the exit are clearly (2) Fir exits are clut-
marked. ter-free
Laboratory has plan SI/RR Check Material safety
for safe storage and data sheet is available
handling of poten-
tially flammable
materials.
48 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Fire Safety audit is RR/SI May be along with
done by competent main Hospital build-
authorities ing/separately
The facility has a Check for staff SI (1) Check staff is aware
system of periodic competencies of
training of staff and for operating fire PASS- Pull the pin, A-
conducts mock drills extinguisher Aim at the base of fire,
regularly for fire S- Squeeze the lever, S
ME C3.3
and other disaster -Sweep side to side
situation (2) Staff is aware of
RACE
R- Rescue, A- Alarm, C-
Confine, E- Extinguish
Standard The facility has adequate qualified and trained staff, required for providing
C4 the assured services to the current case load
The facility has ade- The organogram or OB/RR (1) Check organogram
quate specialist/qual- hierarchical struc- is displayed
ME C4.1 ified personnel as per ture of the laborato- (2) Clearly showing the
service provision ry is defined interrelationship of the
staff
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 49
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Availability of Spe- OB 1-Pathologist
cialist 1-Microbiologist
1-Biochemist
Give full compliance if
at least two specialists
are available
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Availability of OB/ RR Iodine Solution, Hae-
stains matoxylin-eosin, Gram
Romanowsky, StainZie-
hl- Nielsen, Acridine
orange, Albert stain,
India ink, calcofluor
white, KOH
The facility has ade- Availability of Labo- OB/ RR Blood collection tubes,
quate consumables at ratory consumables Swabs, needles, Syring-
ME C5.2 point of use es, Glass slides, Glass
marker/paper stickers,
Lancets etc.
Standard
The facility has equipment & instruments required for assured list of services.
C6
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Availability of OB 1. Binocular Micro-
equipment for hae- scope, Automated Cell
matology Counter (3 part/5 part)
with nucleated RBC
flag, Automated Coag-
ulometer, Automated
ESR analyser, Haemo-
globin HPLC machine
(variant analyser),
Serum electrophoresis
and Hb electrophoresis
2. Check the availabili-
ty of equipment as per
load
3. Check back-up of
the critical equipment
is available in case of
malfunction
Availability of OB 1. Binocular Micro-
equipment for scope, Centrifuge
cytology 2. Check the availabili-
ty of equipment as per
load
3. Check back-up of
the critical equipment
is available in case of
malfunction
Availability of OB 1. Automated Bio-
equipment for bio- chemistry analyser,
chemistry ISE based Electrolyte
analyser, Automated
Hormone Immuno-
assay analyser (CLIA
Based)
2. Check the availabili-
ty of equipment as per
load
3. Check back-up of
the critical equipment
is available in case of
malfunction
Availability of OB Electronic balance
equipment for Hot plate
media preparation Autoclave
room Ph meter
Bunsen burner with
gas supply
52 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Availability of OB 1. Binocular Micro-
equipment for bac- scope, Incubator, Auto-
teriology mated blood culture
Automated bacterial
ID/AST system, Bio-
safety Cabinet Class II
A2 (model conforming
to NSF standards),
Bunsen burner with
gas supply, Computer
with scanner, printer,
UPS, Hot air oven, inoc-
ulating loop, lamp
2. Check the availabili-
ty of equipment as per
load
3. Check back-up of
the critical equipment
is available in case of
malfunction
Availability of OB Binocular Microscope
equipment for my- (LED)
cobacteriology Fluorescent Micro-
scope
Biosafety Cabinet Class
II A2 with thimble
ducting (model con-
forming to NSF
standards)
NAAT machine
Tissue homogenizer
Bunsen burner with
gas supply
Availability of OB Centrifuge
equipment for se- ELISA reader and
rology and molecu- washer
lar biology/virology VDRL rotator/shaker
Real Time PCR ma-
chine
Biosafety Cabinet Class
II A2 (model
conforming to NSF
standards)
PCR Workstation,
ELISA reader and ELI-
SA washer
Microcentrifuge
PCR hood/PCR work-
station
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 53
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Availability of func- OB Autoclave (Vertical &
tional equipment Horizontal), Biosafety
under NVBDCP cabinet, Hot air oven,
Incubators Binocular,
Microscopes, ELISA
reader & washer, Mi-
cropipette water bath,
Centrifuge, Mixer/
Rotator
Availability of func- OB Pipettes, Centrifuge,
tional equipment HIV test kits, test tubes
under NACP
Availability of func- OB Autoclave, Analytical
tional equipment & Precision balance,
under NTEP Bottle washer, Bio-
logical Safety Cabinet
class 2A with thimble
ducting, Electric micro
incinerator, Hot plate,
Incubator, Microscope
Binocular, Microliter
Pipette, Centrifuge, PH
meter, Hot air oven
Availability of func- OB Biosafety Cabinet Class
tional equipment ll A2 with thimble
& instrument for ducting, Cell counter,
testing samples Hormone, Electrolyte
and Urine analyser,
ESR tubes, Micropi-
pettes, Electrophoresis
unit, PCR machine,
Blood gas analyser,
NAAT machine, Glass-
ware and RDKs
Availability of func- Availability of OB Buckets for mopping,
tional equipment equipment for mops, duster, waste
ME C 6.2
and instruments for cleaning trolley, deck brush
support services
Availability of OB/RR Autoclave - Horizontal
equipment for & Vertical
sterilization and
disinfection
Availability of OB Computer, Printer, UPS,
equipment for Data bar code scanner/read-
Management er, etc.
54 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Departments have Availability of OB Refrigerator, Deep
patient furniture and equipment for stor- freezer, Test tube racks
ME C 6.3
fixtures as per load age of sample and
and service provision reagents
Standard Facility has a defined and established procedure for effective utilization, evaluation
C7 and augmentation of competence and performance of staff
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
(3) Check on job
assessment for test
performance, record-
ing and reporting of
results, review of in-
termediate test results,
worksheets, QC results
etc., observe for instru-
ment handling, main-
tenance, and function
check. Competence
assessment for test
performance through
re-testing of previously
analysed samples, etc.
(4) Check feedback is
given to all staff after
competence assess-
ment
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Check lab techni- SI/RR Check training record
cian are trained for 1. Lab technicians is
sample collection trained on venous
blood collection, col-
lection of microbiology
samples like throat
swab, nasopharyngeal
swab, pus samples, slit
skin etc.
2. Staff nurses or desig-
nated person for sam-
ple collection in wards
are trained for Arterial
blood collection and
capillary blood collec-
tion (in case lab techni-
cian are not collecting
the blood from wards)
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Check staff is SI/RR Data entry, specimen
trained to use LIMS tracking ,reporting,
and IHIP analysis of data etc
Training needs are Check lab. has a SI/RR (1) Check that Lab
identified based on system for identi- head/ designated in
competence assess- fying the training charge has listed the
ment and perfor- needs and plan to gaps found during the
mance evaluation and address them. competence assess-
facility prepares the ment and performance
training plan appraisal exercise . (2)
ME C7.4 These gaps in perfor-
mance and competence
are factored in while
developing training
plan for staff.
(3) Check the records
of training need assess-
ment
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Staff is skilled SI/RR (1) Check supervisors
for maintaining make periodic rounds
Laboratory records of department and
monitor that staff is
working according to
the training imparted.
(2) Also staff is pro-
vided on job training
wherever there is still
gaps
Standard The facility has established Programme for inspection, testing and maintenance
D1 and calibration of Lab Equipment's.
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Staff is skilled for SI Interview few of the
trouble shooting staff randomly
in case equipment
malfunction
Periodic cleaning, OB/RR 1. Done by the operator
inspection and 2. Check asset list of
maintenance of the equipment is main-
equipment's is done tained
Staff is aware of the SI Check for the Bench
Bench Aids for use Aids for routine use of
of equipment equipment
There is a system OB Defective/Out of order
to label Defective/ equipment are stored
Out of order equip- appropriately until it
ment's has been repaired
All equipment are SI/RR/OB 1. Checking is done by
checked for the a qualified person
safety of the users 2. Earthing is checked
six monthly for all ap-
plicable equipment's
3. Safety instructions is
available readily
4. There is a system of
reporting of equipment
related adverse event
Equipment accep- RR 1. Acceptance testing
tance testing is details should be part
done upon in- of installation report
stallation or after 2. Post preventive/
preventive mainte- breakdown main-
nance tenance acceptance
testing should be
documented in service
reports.
3. Post preventive/
breakdown mainte-
nance appropriate QC /
calibrators must be run
and outputs reviewed
as a part of acceptance
testing
60 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
IT equipment are RR/SI There is system of
covered under cor- timely corrective break
rective and preven- down maintenance of
tive maintenance the for computers and
program other IT equipment
The facility has estab- All the measur- OB/ RR Recalibration done
lished procedure for ing equipment's/ at least every six
ME D1.2 internal and external instrument are months or as per OEM
calibration of measur- calibrated specifications.
ing Equipment
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Staff is aware of SI/RR Check for:
when and how to 1. A change of reagent
recalibrate the lot
equipment's 2. If QC results are out-
side of the acceptable
limits
3. After major mainte-
nance or service
4. When recommended
by the manufacturer
Standard The facility has defined procedures for storage, inventory management and dispensing
D2 of consumables and reagents
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
The facility ensures Reagents, control OB/RR Check reagents are
proper use and stor- and other consum- kept away from water
age of consumables ables are stored and sources of heat,
and reagents appropriately direct sunlight
All reagents, consum-
ME D2.2
ables, stains, media,
kits, and antimicrobials
should be stored as
recommended by the
manufacturer.
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Reagents, controls OB/RR Details relevant to
and other consum- usage like sensitivity,
ables are accompa- specificity, measuring
nied with relevant range, shelf life, SDS,
SOP storage and disposal
Reagents and OB/RR Reagents label con-
control are labelled tain name, strength or
appropriately concentration, date of
preparation/opening,
date of expiry, storage
conditions, warning
and opened by - initial/
sign
Laboratory has RR/SI 1. New lot of reagents
established proce- is verified for perfor-
dure for acceptance mance before use in
testing of all the the tests
reagents before 2. Records of lot Verifi-
putting into the use cation of reagents
The facility ensures No expired consum- OB/RR Check randomly for
management of ex- ables found expiry of the reagents,
ME D2.3
piry and near expiry controls and other
reagents consumables
Expiry and near RR Check the records
expiry reagent
are identified and
stored separately
The facility has estab- Hospital imple- OB/RR Based on First Expiry
lished procedure for ments scientific First Out (FEFO)
inventory manage- inventory man-
ME D2.4
ment techniques agement system
according to their
needs
There is practice SI/RR 1. Based on the con-
of calculating and sumption
maintaining buffer 2. Stock and expen-
stock of reagents diture registers are
and controls maintained
There is procedure SI/RR There is no stock out of
for periodically re- reagents
plenishing reagents,
control and other
consumables
64 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Description of RR Check for the invento-
reagents, kits and ry log having details
materials are main- of reagents , kits and
tained in the inven- material name,
tory log/register. batch/Lot/Cat. no.,
date of receipt, date of
expiry , date of enter-
ing into service etc
Standard The facility provides safe, secure and comfortable environment to staff, patients and
D3 visitors.
The facility has provi- The access to lab- OB Look of restricted en-
sion of restriction of oratory's testing try signage outside the
visitors in IPHL area is restricted to testing areas
ME D3.2
the laboratory staff Biohazard warning
only sign is placed at labora-
tory doors
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Availability of sepa- OB 1. For histopathology
rate room for tissue sections
processing 2. Fume hoods are
available in tissue pro-
cessing area
3. Separate ventilation
for Biosafety cabinets
in microbiology
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Standard
The facility has established Programme for maintenance and upkeep of the facility
D4
Exterior of the facil- Exterior of the OB 1.Whitewashed in uni-
ity building is main- building is plas- form colour
ME D4.1
tained appropriately tered and painted 2. No outdated poster
are pasted on the walls
Interior of the OB 1.Whitewashed in uni-
building is plas- form colour
tered & painted 2. No outdated poster/
information/instruc-
tion are pasted on the
walls
The facility is clean All areas are clean OB Floors, walls, roof, roof
and hygienic and without dirt, tops, sinks, waiting,
ME D4.2 grease, littering and sample collection area
cobwebs and testing areas are
neat and clean
Cleaning schedule RR 1. May be shared with
is maintained the main building
2. Regular inspection
of cleaning work by
designated person
Surface of furniture OB Check there is no dirt
and fixtures are or grease on furniture
clean
The facility has OB/RR/SI Check for:
standard proce- 1. Curtains/Blind &
dures for cleaning shades are cleaned
of curtains/blind & regularly
shades
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Periodic mainte- RR/OB Annual maintenance
nance of the infra- plan is available
structure is defined
at the regular
interval
There is no RR
clogged/over flow-
ing drain in facility
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Facility periodically RR
tests the quality
of water from the
source (municipal
supply, bore well
etc) for bacterial
and chemical con-
tent
Distilled/deionised OB/RR Testing must be done
water is used for every three months
testing
Water used for ana- OB/RR Parameters used for
lytical purpose is of water testing must be
reagent grade as per test require-
ments and manufac-
turer instruction in
cases of automated and
semiautomated anal-
ysers
The facility ensures Availability of OB/SI Check that UPS con-
adequate power power back up in nection with critical
ME D5.2
backup in all patient laboratory and equipment is provided
care areas as per load related areas
Availability of noise OB May be shared with the
less generator for main hospital building
the power backup
Standard
The facility ensures support to all linked labs as per service mandate
D6
The facility has estab- All spoke units are RR/SI Check the list of linked
lished procedure for identified & down- Block Public Health
ME D6.1 providing technical ward linkage is Laboratories and other
support to linked labs established for tests peripheral laboratories
is available
Regional/state/ RR/SI Facilities are identified
medical college are for upward linkages
identified & upward and staff is aware of it
linkage is estab-
lished for tests not
conducted at IPHL
Check routine RR/SI 1. Restructuring of rou-
testing and public tine and public health
health related test- diagnostics is done and
ing is integrated its functional
2. Check there is no du-
plication of diagnostic
services
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 69
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
There is established RR/SI Check for established
system of integra- linkage between IPHL
tion between health and other laboratories
and other depart- under various depart-
ments ments like Central Pol-
lution Control Board
(CPCB), FSSAI, PHED,
veterinary, forensic
department, etc.
The facility has estab- The facility pro- RR/OB Check for
lished procedure for vides 1. Conduct training for
providing capacity capacity building hub and peripheral
ME D6.2 building support to support to the laboratory staff
linked labs linked labs 2. Check the records
for type and number of
trainings
The facility has estab- The facility has RR/SI 1. Information regard-
lished procedure for functional Labora- ing samples received
providing information tory Information in IPHL or sent to
management support Management Sys- regional/state lab are
using digital tech- tem (LIMS) to pro- recorded & updated for
ME D6.3
nology to linked labs vides information all samples including
and administrative regarding samples in-house samples
authorities 2. Randomly, select at
least 5 samples and
check for details
The facility has es- RR/PI 1. Reports are sent via
tablished system to Hospital Information
report test results System, email, SMS, etc.
to the patient
2. Randomly, select at
least 5 samples and
check for details
The facility has RR/SI LIMS support all the
functional Labora- information manage-
tory Information ment functions like
Management Sys- data collection, storage,
tem (LIMS) for data archiving for analysis,
management research, information,
and policy decisions to
detect, prevent and re-
spond to public health
threats in real time
70 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
There is an estab- RR/SI Check for functional
lished linkage with linkage between IPHL
Integrated Health with IHIP to support
Information Plat- surveillance and man-
form (IHIP) aging outbreaks
Standard
Facility has defined and established procedures for Financial Management
D7
The facility ensures There is system to RR/SI As given under PM-
the proper utilization track and ensure ABHIM, XV-Finance
ME D7.1
of fund provided to it that funds are re- Commission, etc.
ceived on time
Funds/Grants pro- RR As given under PM-
vided are utilized in ABHIM, XV-Finance
specific time limit Commission, etc.
Standard Facility is compliant with all statutory and regulatory requirement imposed by local,
D8 state or central government
The facility has req- Availability of RR Give full compliance if
uisite licences and valid No objection the facility shares fire
ME D8.1 certificates for oper- Certificate from fire NoC with main hospital
ation of facility and safety authority building
different activities
Availability of RR Give full compliance
Biomedical Waste if the facility shares
Management Au- BMW authorisation
thorisation for gen- with main hospital
erating BMW as per building
prevalent norms/
regulations
Availability of cer- RR
tificate of inspec-
tion of electrical
installation
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 71
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
The facility ensure RR Any positive report of
relevant processes notifiable disease is in-
are in compliance timated to designated
with statutory re- authorities
quirement
Updated copies of Availability of copy RR Updated copy is avail-
relevant laws, regula- of Bio medical able, may be shared
tions and government waste management with the main hospital
ME D8.2
orders are available at rules 2016 and it's
the facility subsequent amend-
ments
Code of Medical RR Updated copy is avail-
ethics 2002 able, may be shared
with the main hospital
Person with disabil- RR Updated copy is avail-
ity Act 1995 able, may be shared
with the main hospital
Right to informa- RR Updated copy is avail-
tion act 2005 able, may be shared
with the main hospital
Indian Tobacco RR Updated copy is avail-
control Act 2003 able, may be shared
with the main hospital
HIV/AIDS preven- RR With mandatory provi-
tion and control Act sion of pre and post-
test counselling)
Epidemic diseases RR Updated copy is avail-
(Amendment) Ordi- able, may be shared
nance 2020 with the main hospital
Standard Roles & Responsibilities of administrative and clinical staff are determined as per
D9 govt. regulations and standards operating procedures.
The facility has estab- Staff is aware of SI Check lab staff is aware
lished job description their role and re- of their roles and re-
ME D9.1
as per govt guidelines sponsibilities sponsibilities
The facility has a Duty roster of RR/SI Check for system for
established procedure specialist is pre- recording time of
for duty roster and pared, updated and reporting and relieving
ME D9.2
deputation communicated (Attendance register/
Biometrics etc) and
handover register
72 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Duty roster of lab RR/SI Check for system for
technician is pre- recording time of
pared, updated and reporting and relieving
communicated (Attendance register/
Biometrics etc)
Duty roster of other RR/SI 1. Housekeeping staff,
staff is prepared, security staff, data
updated and com- entry operator, etc.
municated may be shared with the
main hospital building
2. Check for system
for recording time of
reporting and relieving
(Attendance register/
Biometrics etc)
There is designated SI
in charge for IPHL
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Standard Facility has established procedure for monitoring the quality of outsourced services
D10 and adheres to contractual obligations
OR
If lab test/services
are in-house, give full
compliance
Selection of out- RR 1. May be shared with
sourced agencies is the main hospital
done through com- 2. Review the contract
petitive tendering document
process
74 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
There is a system Facility has defined RR Check:
of monitoring of criteria for assess- 1. Regular monitoring
quality of out sourced ment of quality of and evaluation of staff
services outsourced services is done against defined
ME D10.2 criteria
2. Actions are taken
against non-compli-
ance/deviation from
contractual obligations
Records of black- RR May be shared with the
listed vendors are main hospital building
available
Area of Concern - E Clinical and Diagnostic Services
Standard
The laboratory has defined procedures for registration of Patients at the laboratory
E1
The facility has es- IPHL has defined RR 1. Area like OPD, IPD,
tablished procedure procedure for regis- Emergency and other
for registration of tration of patient critical areas of the
patients visiting lab hospital
ME E1.1 or sample collection 2. Through HIS or Man-
area ual, if process is manu-
al, details will be filled
in LIMS by Data Entry
Operator (DEO)
Test requisition is RR/OB Electronic or on paper
generated by quali-
fied Physician
Annexures Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Sample ID no is OB/RR (1) Sample ID for each
assigned to patient sample is generated
samples for track- manually/BAR Code
ing the sample form/ LIMS ID / HIS ID.
through lab (2) Check if sample ID
is alpha and/or numer-
ical identifier
The facility has es- Each sample RR/OB 1. From linked periph-
tablished procedure received at the eral health facilities
for registration of the laboratory is reg- (HIS/Manual), if pro-
ME E1.2 patient's sample re- istered manually cess is manual, details
ceived from spokes/ or through LIMS or will be filled in LIMS
peripheral labs HIS by Data Entry Operator
(DEO)
Patient demo- RR/OB 1. Unique ID for each
graphic details and sample is generated
Unique laboratory manually/BAR Code
identification num- form/ LIMS ID / HIS ID
ber are recorded 2.Tests requested and
referring lab/ clinician
details are recorded at
time of registration
Standard Facility has established mechanism for referral linkages to maintain
E2 continuity of services
Facility has defined Laboratory has RR/SI For all routine diagnos-
and established pro- established refer- tic tests and tests man-
cedures for continuity ral linkage for the dated under National
ME E2.1 of services sample transferred Health Programmes
from the BPHL/pe- like IDSP, NACP, NTEP,
ripheral facilities NVBDCP, NVHCP etc.
Bibliography Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Standard
The facility has established and defined procedure for pre-testing activities
E3
The facility has estab- Procedure for the OB/SI Haematology, Bio-
lished procedure for patient preparation chemistry, Histopathol-
ME E3.1
patient preparation is defined ogy, Clinical Pathology,
Microbiology, etc.
The patient is pre- RR/OB/SI Check that the pa-
pared before col- tients are educated for
lecting the primary necessary instructions
sample before sample collec-
tion specially where
changes may take place
due to physiological
barriers.
Check with patients OB/PI Fasting blood sugar,
if instructions are cessation of drugs be-
give to them before fore sample collection
sample collection like hormones, special
timing of sample col-
lection, etc.
OR
Advised patient to sit
down till sweat subside
- for electrolyte or S.
protein
OR
Patient is advised to
take balanced diet a
night before- Urea and
urates, etc.
The facility has es- Procedure for the OB/SI Haematology, Bio-
tablished procedure sample collection is chemistry, Histopathol-
ME E3.2 for sample collection defined ogy, Clinical Pathology,
from patient care Microbiology, etc.
areas
IPHL has defined OB/SI It includes:
mechanism for 1. Sample collected
sample collection from OPD
within the facility 2. Samples from IPD of
or from the periph- the district hospital
eral health facilities 3. Samples collected
from spokes/peripher-
al facilities
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 77
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
8. Smoothly insert the
needle with bevel at
15-30 degree of angle
9. Remove the torni-
quet as soon as the
blood begin to flow
10. In case of multiple
punctures, record is
maintained
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Instructions for RR/SI Check that the staff is
collection and aware of sample collec-
handling of primary tion instructions like
sample are com- order of draw, volume
municated to those of sample for different
responsible for type of tests, sample
collection collection instructions
for different age group
and sample collection
from patients admitted
in critical care unit, etc.
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
The facility has estab- IPHL has defined a RR/OB 1. The facility is using
lished procedure for procedure for label- the bar code as identi-
sample labelling and ling of the samples fier, if labelling is done
documentation manually, give partial
compliance
ME E3.3 2. If bar code is main-
tained, check randomly
how bar codes are
placed (volume of the
sample is visible from
outside)
Samples are la- RR/OB 1. Identifiers may in-
belled with at least clude (but not limited
two unique identi- to):
fiers Patient's name, Age,
Gender, Patient unique
id, Name of the test re-
quested, time and date
of sample collection or
bar codes
Laboratory has RR/OB/SI Check that Patient's
system to trace the name/unique id of the
primary sample sample is verified at
from requisition each working station
form
The facility has a Requisition of all RR/OB/SI 1. Requisition form
standardised Test laboratory test contain information:
Requisition form for is given in stan- Name and identifica-
the tests dardised requisi- tion number of patient,
tion form name of authorized
requester,
type of primary sam-
ple,
investigation request-
ed,
ME E3.4
date and time of prima-
ry sample collection,
signature of the prima-
ry sample collector and
time of receipt of sam-
ple by laboratory
2. Check randomly in
10 requisition forms
for uniform data col-
lection
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 81
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
The facility has estab- Procedures are de- OB/SI Haematology, Bio-
lished procedure for fined for packaging chemistry, Histopathol-
ME E3.5
packaging and trans- and transportation ogy, Clinical Pathology,
portation of samples of samples Microbiology, etc.
Collected samples OB 1. Samples are collect-
are packed as per ed in vacutainers as
the standard guide- per the guidelines
lines 2. Samples are packed
in triple layered con-
tainer packing (partic-
ularly virology)
3. Check 10 samples
received from the
periphery and sample
collection area
Laboratory has RR/OB/SI Transportation of
system in place to sample includes: Tem-
monitor the trans- perature requirement,
portation of the preservation (if any),
sample within the time frame, special
facility and the pe- packaging require-
ripheral facilities ment to avoid leakage,
safety of the personnel
handling the sample,
tracking system for
samples, etc.
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Samples are trans- OB/RR Check for:
ported timely at the 1. Samples are picked
IPHL on the same day
2. Cumulative sample
transportation
time from all the
spokes/peripheral
health facilities to the
primary receiving hub
laboratory should not
exceed 2
hours (starting from
the point of pick-up)
3. Samples should be
picked up once a day
from PHCs, and twice a
day from CHCs/FRUs,
depending on the pa-
tient load
4. Verify with the req-
uisition slip
5. Data loggers are
used for monitoring
in terms of time and
temperature
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
The facility has Check criteria is RR/OB/SI Checks staff is aware
defined criteria for defined for sample of sample acceptance
sample acceptance or acceptance and criteria which include
rejection followed appropriate container,
quantity/volume (in
case of blood/urine
sample), temperature
on receipt, quality
of sample (in case of
ME E3.6 tissue samples), any
leakage, etc.
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
There is defined OB/SI 1. Accompanied by
procedure of sam- TRF,
ple acceptance for 2. Unpack the patient
samples received sample and match it
from the spokes/ with TRF, if there is any
peripheral health inconsistency in sam-
facilities ple label and request
form then procedure
is defined to deal with
the discrepancies
3. Recording of the
date and time of the
receipt of the sample,
4. Sample colour ap-
pearance and volume
are noted in TRF
5. Record sample ID no
and patient informa-
tion in register/LIMS
for further monitoring
Sample prepara- OB/SI Check the staff is aware
tion as per defined of processing protocols
protocols
Check criteria is RR/OB/SI 1. Checks staff is aware
defined for sam- of sample rejection
ple rejection and criteria which include
followed Unlabelled sample,
incomplete or misla-
belled sample, incor-
rect container or pre-
servative, insufficient
sample, excessive delay
in receiving the sam-
ple, leaking container,
sub-optimal sample/
haemolysed sample,
specimen contami-
nated with biohazard
material, Prolonged
transport time
2. Check record is
maintained for rejected
samples along with the
reasoning
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 85
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
3. Check IPHL inform
peripheral lab about
the rejected sample-re-
cord is maintained that
who has informed and
at what time
4. In case of emergency,
testing is performed
and result is given
stating that sample is
compromised so may
be co-related clinically
Standard
The facility has established and defined procedure for testing activities
E4
Facility performs tests The facility per- RR/SI Laboratory has kept
as per established forms tests as the list of procedure
procedure per established for conducting each
procedure/test test.
kit instructions/ Test procedure in-
programme specific cludes:
ME E4.1
guidelines Name, Scope, Purpose
of examination, Method
of Procedure, Reagents,
equipment, glassware
required, Procedural
Steps, etc.
86 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Test procedures are Quality control RR/SI 1. Haematology, Bio-
verified through rou- mechanisms are chemistry, Histopathol-
tine quality control defined for all test ogy, Clinical Pathology,
methods procedures Microbiology, Cytology,
ME E4.2 etc.
2. Check IPHL runs
quality control at
defined interval as per
standard procedures
All test procedures RR/SI 1. Check for records for
are verified before verification in terms
routine use of performance char-
acteristics of quality
control method like:
Precision, Accuracy,
Range / Analytical
Measurement Range
(AMR), Clinical Report-
able Range (CRR) –
when sample is diluted
to report higher values
not covered by AMR,
Analytical Sensitivity,
Analytical Specificity,
carry over
2. For Rapid Diagnostic
Tests as per manufac-
turer's guidelines
Facility has estab- Critical values are RR/SI Check that:
lished procedure for defined for each 1. Staff is aware of criti-
Biological reference specialization cal values
intervals & critical 2. Critical Values are
alert values displayed / filed for
ME E4.3 ready reference in the
laboratory, check the
documents
3. Read-back in case
of telephonic or verbal
communication
There is an estab- RR/SI Critical result report-
lished procedure of ing register including
reporting the criti- register having details
cal alert values of :
Date, time, test details,
result details, respon-
sible laboratory staff
and person notified are
maintained at labora-
tory
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 87
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Laboratory has RR/SI 1. BRI is documented
defined and updat- 2. BRI is updated annu-
ed its Biological ally and communicated
Reference Interval to the staff whenever
(BRI) and has a pro- there is change pro-
cedure to review cedure/ method of
the BRI testing
3. Check for BRI or clin-
ical normative range is
written in the reports
Standard
Laboratory has defined and established procedure for the post testing processes
E5
The facility has estab- The facility has a RR/OB Reports of the results
lished procedure for standardised for- include:
reporting of result mat for reporting of Name and Unique
result Patient Identification
Number, Date and Time
of Specimen Collection,
Date and Time of Test
done and result report-
ed, Name and address
of the Laboratory,
Name/Source of sam-
ple (e.g. – whole blood,
urine etc.), Name of
ME E5.1 doctor and referee fa-
cility, Interpretation of
results, method, mea-
surement units (SI)
and biological refer-
ence interval or clinical
decision limit or cut-off
values (as applicable),
Duly signed by autho-
rised signatory, identi-
fication of the person
releasing the report,
page number of total
number of the pages
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Interim results are RR Any preliminary report
followed by the generated for urgent
final reports sampling, critical result
intimation is followed
by the final report
signed by authorised
signatory
Reports are validat- RR Microbiologist/Pathol-
ed by authorised ogist/Biochemist
person
The Laboratory RR/SI TAT for each test is
defines the Turn defined and is commu-
Around Time (TAT) nicated to the patient
for each test both in form of display or
for the routine and information material
emergency cases
IPHL has defined OB/SI Through LIMS/SMS/e-
protocol for re- mail/hard copy
lease of the results
including referred/
outsourced tests
Staff is designated OB/SI In IPDs and other areas
to disseminate the of the hospital
reports
Staff is aware of OB/SI Like inadequate,
post analytical ambiguous report,
error improper data entry
and manual transcrip-
tion error (if LIMS is
not functional), failure
or delay in reporting
critical values, inad-
equate or incorrect
interpretation, valida-
tion of errors in data,
improper retention of
the sample, etc.
Reports are SI/RR/OB Tele equipment print
checked for tran- out, workbook, data-
scription errors sheet with the report
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 89
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Check notification OB/SI/RR Through LIMS/SMS/e-
is sent by lab in mail
case of any delay in
the reporting
The laboratory has The laboratory RR/SI 1. Laboratory has
defined procedure for has procedure to clearly defined the re-
revision/amendment ensure revision of sponsibility of amend-
of the reports when results and correct ing the test results
required interpretation be- 2. Revision/ Amend-
fore release of the ments in the reports
results due to re-test/ re-sam-
pling/ QC failure etc.
are highlighted in the
ME E5.2
report.
3. Reason of amend-
ments are documented
along with the date of
amendment
4. All the amended
reports are stored by
the laboratory in soft
or hard copies
Laboratory has RR/ SI Check for the records
process of taking of amendment in
corrective actions reports, recall of the re-
for any discrepancy ports whenever there
in the test result is a issue related to the
accuracy of the results
during the review
The facility has estab- Samples are re- RR/SI Check for sample
lished procedure for tained and stored retention protocols,
sample storage and for re sampling and storage conditions as
its disposal additional examina- mandated, record of
ME E5.3
tion as per facility's storage is maintained,
policy & procedure samples are labelled
with time of prepara-
tion
90 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Separate refrigera- OB 1.It is clearly men-
tor is available for tioned on the refriger-
sample storage ator, "for samples only"
or "for kits only"
2. Temperature is
maintained for the re-
tained samples as per
the guidelines
3. System to identify
the date of sample
collection
4. If domestic refriger-
ator is used, calibrated
thermometer is placed
inside the refrigerator
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Staff is aware of RR/SI 1. When one level QC
defined protocol for is used
rejection of test run - Value is outside 3 SD
- 2 consecutive values
are outside 2 SD on the
same side, but within
3 SD
- 10 consecutive values
or above or below the
mean, but within 2 SD
2. When two level QC
is used
- Either QC value is
outside 3 SD
- Both QC values
are outside 2 SD, but
within 3SD/ difference
between QC values is
>4 SD
- 10 consecutive values
of the same level QC
are above or below the
mean, but within 2 SD
- 5 consecutive values
of one level & 5 consec-
utive values of the oth-
er level QC are above
or below the mean, but
within 2 SD
The facility has RR/SI Check the mechanism
mechanism of inter- for:
nal quality control 1. Retesting of any
in place when con- randomly chosen spec-
trol material is not imen/s
available 2. Replicate test of
sample by different
method, different
machine and different
person, whichever
applicable
3. Correlation of test
results with other pa-
rameters
92 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
The facility plot RR/SI 1. Staff knows how to
Levy Jennings’s (LJ) plot and interpret LJ
chart daily for Qual- chart using inbuilt soft-
ity Control values ware in the analysers
or using excel sheet
2. Outliers are identi-
fied
3. Corrective action is
taken and documented
on the identified out-
liers according to the
Westgard rule
The facility has es- Quality assurance RR/SI Bacteriology, Para-
tablished mechanism mechanisms are sitology, Mycology,
of internal quality defined for all steps Serology, Molecular
ME E6.2
control using semi of microbiology Diagnostics
quantitative/qualita-
tive methods
Quality assurance RR/SI To identify and manage
mechanisms are the potential errors
defined for all steps
of histopathology
and cytology
IQC (Qualitative) RR/SI Smears, ESR, Urine
are defined for all Analysis, Semen Analy-
steps of Haema- sis, Boddy fluid analy-
tology and Clinical sis like CSF
Pathology
Internal Quality RR/SI As defined in pro-
Control processes gramme guidelines
are followed for (like TB, Malaria, etc.)
national health
programmes
The facility has es- External Quality RR/SI Haematology, Microbi-
tablished mechanism Assurance methods ology, Cytology, Bio-
of external quality are defined for test chemistry, Histopathol-
ME E6.3
assurance performed in IPHL ogy, Clinical Pathology,
etc. or as per the scope
of services
IPHL has defined RR/SI EQAS or Peer group
the ways to conduct comparison or ex-
external quality change of sample or
assurance split testing
External Quality RR/SI For monitoring, accura-
Assurance is done cy and calculating bias
on regular basis
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 93
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
providers are iden- RR/SI Process for receiving
tified for Proficien- the sample, analysis,
cy Testing/EQAS sharing the result, eval-
uation of the result and
notification of result is
defined
EQAs reports are RR/SI 1. Staff is aware of
analysed and eval- EQAS reporting system,
uated how to evaluate, inter-
pret, and compare like
Z score/VIS score, etc.
2. Staff is aware about
the acceptable perfor-
mance criteria for the
analytes
3. Corrective actions
are taken on abnormal
values/ Outliers
Staff is aware of RR/SI 1. Incorrect units
common errors that 2. Incorrect sample
may occur under tested
EQAS 3. Incorrect classifica-
tion of testing methods
4. Improper reconsti-
tution
5. Transcription errors
External quality RR/SI 1. Onsite evaluation
assurance program done monthly
implemented as per 2. Random Blinded re-
NTEP program checking (RBRC) done
monthly
External quality RR/SI
assurance program
implemented for
NVBDCP
External quality RR/SI
assurance under
NACP
Standard Facility has defined and established procedures for maintaining, updating of patients’
E7 clinical records and their storage
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Register/records are All records are la- RR All the Laboratory
maintained as per lab belled and indexed records have unique Id
policy number as per docu-
ment control policy of
ME E7.2
the facility. The records
can be maintained as
physical copies or elec-
tronically (LIMS)
The facility has estab- The facility has OB/RR Look for the availabil-
lished computerised established Lab- ity of following infor-
information system to oratory Informa- mation through func-
support lab functions tion Management tional LIMS/HIS:
System (LIMS) to 1. Samples tracking
support lab func- from collection to
tions reporting
2. Reporting of test
result
3. Collection, storage,
archiving and analys-
ing laboratory data for
decision making
ME E7.3 4. Reporting of anal-
ysed data to district
and state administra-
tion, Ministry of Health
& Family Welfare
5. Inventory manage-
ment (kits and re-
agents etc.)
If IPHL maintains
paper based records,
check work flow, qual-
ity and audit trail for
the sample processed
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 95
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Facility has defined OB/SI/RR As per state policy
policy for retrieval
and archiving of
digital records
Standard The facility has defined and established procedures for Emergency Services and
E8 Disaster Management
The facility has disas- Staff is aware of SI/RR Check disaster man-
ter management plan disaster plan or agement committee is
ME E8.1 in place contingency plan at place and IPHL takes
part in regular mock
drills
96 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Role and respon- SI/RR Check staff is aware of
sibilities of staff is their role during di-
defined saster/mass causality
situation
The facility has estab- There are estab- RR/SI As per programmatic
lished procedure for lished procedures guidelines
services under var- for laboratory diag-
ME E9.1
ious communicable nosis of Tuberculo-
disease programmes sis as per prevalent
guidelines
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
There are estab- RR/SI As per programmatic
lished procedures guidelines
for laboratory di-
agnosis of viral hep-
atitis as per preva-
lent guidelines
The facility has es- There are estab- RR/SI As per programmatic
tablished procedure lished procedures guidelines
for services under for laboratory diag-
various non-com- nosis of non-com-
ME E9.2 municable disease municable diseases
programmes (hypertension,
diabetes) as per
prevalent guide-
lines
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Systematic collec- SI/RR For surveillance and
tion, analysis and outbreak monitoring
interpretation of
disease specific
data
Standard
Facility has infection prevention control program and procedures in place
F1
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
IPHL supports Dis- RR 1. Defined format for
trict hospital and requisition and report-
peripheral facilities ing of HAIs ( CLABSI,
in HAI surveillance CAUTI, SSI, VAP)
2. Report of the sur-
veillance are collated,
analysed and shared
with concerned health
facility
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Availability and use OB 1. Preferred method,
of alcohol hand rub except when hands
are visibly soiled or
after contact with
patients, contact with
samples, removal of
gloves etc.
2. Contact time, at east
20-30 sec
Display of Hand OB Prominently displayed
washing Instruction above the hand wash-
at Point of Use ing facility , preferably
in Local language
Hand washing sink OB To prevent splashing
is wide and deep and retention of water
enough
Staff is trained and Adherence to steps OB/SI Ask for demonstration
adhere to standard of Hand washing
ME F2.2
hand washing prac-
tices
Staff aware of when OB/SI Ask for 5 moments of
to hand wash hand washing
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Facility ensures ad- OB/SI Ask the staff about reg-
equate and regular ular availability of PPE
supply of personal
protective equip-
ment
Staff adhere to stan- No reuse of dis- OB/SI Ask the staff that PPE
dard personal protec- posable gloves and is not reused like cap,
ME F3.2
tion practices Masks Mask, Gloves, Apron,
N-95 respirators etc.
Compliance to SI/OB 1. Check adherence
correct method of with Donning & Doff-
wearing and re- ing practice
moving the PPE 2. Staff do pre-and
post-inspection activity
for PPE usage
Staff is aware about SI/OB like size, fit and prop-
appropriate selec- er selection based
tion of PPE on nature of patient
interaction and po-
tential exposure to
hazard with respect to
area of working, e.g.
face shield or chemical
splash goggles in case
of chemicals
Staff is aware about SI/OB Check whether soiled
appropriate dispos- PPEs are disposed in
al of PPE after use appropriate bins
Standard
Facility has standard Procedures for processing of equipment's and instruments
F4
Facility ensures stan- Decontamination OB/SI/RR Applicable to all equip-
dard practices and and cleaning of ment
materials for decon- equipment is done
ME F4.1
tamination and clean- as per guidelines
ing of instruments
and procedures areas
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Decontamination of OB/SI Ask staff about how
operating & Proce- they decontaminate
dure surfaces work benches
(Wiping with 0.5%
Chlorine solution)
Facility ensures stan- Disinfection and OB/SI Disinfection by hot air
dard practices and sterilization as oven at 160 degree Cel-
materials for disinfec- appropriate for re- sius for 1 hour or other
ME F4.2
tion and sterilization usable items approved methods as
of instruments and per laboratory proce-
equipment's dure
Autoclave is used OB/SI
for culture media
and other infected
material
Standard Physical layout and environmental control of the laboratory ensures
F5 infection prevention
Layout of the lab is Facility layout OB 1. Separate area for TB
conducive for the ensures separation sample collection
infection prevention of infectious patient 2. Patient with acute
ME F5.1
and control practices at sample collection febrile respiratory
area symptoms are placed
at least 1m away
Respiratory hygiene OB Collection area and
and cough eti- report receiving area
quettes posters are
displayed
Facility layout en- OB Microbiology, Myco-
sures separation of bacteriology (TB) and
each operating area Molecular diagnostic
lab are separated from
rest of the laboratories
through an access con-
trolled entry
Floors and wall OB Look for non-slippery
surfaces are easily floor (or epoxy grout in
cleanable tiles), surfaces should
be smooth & washable,
seamless and imper-
vious with sealed or
welded joints
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 103
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
No fabrics or OB
carpeting is in the
laboratory
Facility ensures avail- Availability of RR/SI Sodium Hypochlorite,
ability of standard disinfectant as per 70% Isopropyl alcohol,
ME F5.2
materials for cleaning requirement Phenolic compound
and disinfection
Availability of RR/SI Hospital grade phenyl,
cleaning agent as disinfectant detergent
per requirement solution
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Cleaning equip- OB Any cleaning equip-
ment's like broom ment leading to disper-
are not used in lab- sion of dust particles in
oratory air should be avoided
Facility ensures air Negative Pressure OB/RR 1. Check at Highly
quality of high risk in lab infectious area like
area Mycobacteriology &
Virology maintained
negative pressure
-2.5Pa (Particularly for
TB containment lab
-12.5Pa)
2. HEPA filter H13-
ME F5.4
14/99.7% efficiency
with air flow speed
25-35 FPM
3. Humidity 45-65%
4. Check for daily mon-
itoring record of HVAC
parameters and annual
validation report from
third party
Standard Facility has defined and established procedures for segregation, collection, treatment
F6 and disposal of Bio Medical and hazardous Waste.
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Segregation of An- OB/SI Human Anatomical
atomical and soiled waste, Items contami-
waste in Yellow Bin nated with blood, body
fluids, dressings, cotton
swabs, lab culture,
specimen of microor-
ganism, dishes used for
culture, routine mask
and gowns
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Used slides are OB/SI NTEP-slides are
disinfected before disinfected with 5%
disposal phenol/40% phenolic
compound/phenolic
compound
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Disposal of biomed- OB/SI As per latest BMW
ical waste as per rules
guidelines
Standard The facility has defined mission, vision, values, quality policy and objectives,
G1 and prepares a strategic plan to achieve them
Facility has defined Vision and mission RR/SI As per state and na-
mission & vision statement have tional health policy
ME G1.1 statement been defined ade-
quately May be shared with the
main hospital
Facility has defined Core values of the RR/SI Check if core values of
core values of the lab are defined organization such as
organization non-discrimination,
transparency, ethical
clinical practices, com-
ME G1.2
petence etc have been
defined.
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Facility has defined Quality Policy is de- RR/SI Check quality policy
Quality policy, which fined and approved of the facility has been
is in congruency with defined in consultation
the mission & vision with hospital staff and
of facility duly approved by the
head of the facility. Also
ME G1.3 check Quality Policy
enables achievement of
mission of the facility
and health department
Facility has defined SMART Quality RR/SI Check short term valid
quality objectives Objectives have quality objectivities
to achieve mission, framed have been framed
vision and quality addressing key quality
policy issues in each depart-
ME G1.4 ment and cores ser-
vices. Check if these
objectives are Specific,
Measurable, Attainable,
Relevant and Time
Bound.
Facility prepares stra- Check if plan for im- RR/SI Verify with records
tegic plan to achieve plementing quality that a time bound
mission, vision, policy and objec- action plan has been
quality policy and tives have prepared prepared to achieve
objectives quality policy and ob-
ME G1.6
jectives in consultation
with hospital staff .
Check if the plan has
been approved by the
hospital management
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 109
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Facility periodically Check time bound RR/SI Review the records
reviews the progress action plan is being that action plan on
of strategic plan to- reviewed at regular quality objectives
wards mission, vision, time interval being reviewed at least
policy and objectives once in month by de-
partmental in charges
ME G1.7
and during the quality
team meeting.
The progress on quali-
ty objectives have been
recorded in Action Plan
tracking sheet
Standard
The facility has established organizational framework for quality improvement
G2
The facility has a Quality circle has RR/SI Check if quality circle is
ME G2.1 quality team in place been formed in the formed and its func-
Laboratory tional
The facility reviews Quality circle meets RR/SI Check the records
quality of its services monthly and review
ME G2.2
at periodic intervals the quality activi-
ties
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Standard The facility has documented, implemented and updated Standard Operating
G3 Procedures for all key processes and support services
Laboratory standard The facility has doc- RR/SI
operating procedures umented Quality
ME G3.1
are available system manual
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Laboratory has doc- RR/SI Haematology, Microbi-
umented system for ology, Cytology, Bio-
storage of examined chemistry, Histopathol-
samples ogy, Clinical Pathology,
etc.
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Laboratory has doc- RR/SI Haematology, Microbi-
umented procedure ology, Cytology, Bio-
for maintenance chemistry, Histopathol-
and calibration of ogy, Clinical Pathology,
equipment etc.
Laboratory has RR/SI Haematology, Microbi-
documented the ology, Cytology, Bio-
Standard Operat- chemistry, Histopathol-
ing Procedure for ogy, Clinical Pathology,
maintaining the etc.
confidentiality of
reports
Work instruction/ RR/OB
clinical protocols
are displayed
Laboratory has doc- RR/SI Haematology, Microbi-
umented procedure ology, Cytology, Bio-
for validation of chemistry, Histopathol-
results of reagents, ogy, Clinical Pathology,
stains, media and etc.
kits etc. wherever
required
Laboratory has RR/SI Haematology, Microbi-
documented system ology, Cytology, Bio-
for storage, retain- chemistry, Histopathol-
ing and retrieval of ogy, Clinical Pathology,
laboratory records, etc.
primary sample,
Examination sam-
ple and reports of
results
Laboratory has doc- RR/SI Haematology, Microbi-
umented system of ology, Cytology, Bio-
resolution of com- chemistry, Histopathol-
plaints and other ogy, Clinical Pathology,
feedback received etc.
from stakeholders
Laboratory has doc- RR/SI Haematology, Microbi-
umented procedure ology, Cytology, Bio-
for internal audits chemistry, Histopathol-
ogy, Clinical Pathology,
etc.
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 113
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Laboratory has RR/SI Haematology, Microbi-
documented proce- ology, Cytology, Bio-
dure for purchase chemistry, Histopathol-
of External services ogy, Clinical Pathology,
and supplies etc.
The facility ensures Hospital has estab- RR/SI (a) Check availability
documented policies lished procedure of requisition forms &
and procedures are for drafting, re- formats for developing
appropriately ap- viewing, approving the required docu-
proved and controlled the Quality Man- ments. A system in
agement systems place to draft, review
documents the QMS documents
ME G3.4 and approval to use the
documents is given by
appropriate authority.
(b) Check the de-
tailed procedure is
mentioned in Quality
Improvement manual
and followed
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Standard The facility has established internal & external quality assurance programmes
G4 for laboratory functions
The facility has estab- Routine monitoring RR/SI 1. check the daily
lished internal quality of lab and related rounds are taken using
assurance programs areas is done by daily round checklist
ME G4.1
for lab designated person 2. Corrections and
corrective actions are
taken immediately
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Person is identified RR/SI 1. Person is trained to
to conduct internal coordinate the internal
and external assess- and external assess-
ment ments' activities
2. Person is aware of
their roles and respon-
sibilities before, during
and after the internal
and external assess-
ments
Internal assessors RR/SI 1. Internal assessors
are identified are trained to use the
NQAS checklist
Internal assessment RR/SI 1. Internal assessment
is done using NQAS is done at periodic
checklist interval
2. Records of internal
assessment are main-
tained
Non-compliances RR/SI Check the non-compli-
are enumerated ances are presented &
and recorded discussed during quali-
ty team meetings
The facility has estab- State assessment is RR/SI 1. Records of state
lished external quality done using NQAS assessment are main-
ME G4.2
assurance programs checklist tained
for lab
Non-compliances RR/SI Check the non-compli-
are enumerated ances are presented &
and recorded discussed during quali-
ty team meetings
Actions are planned Check action plans RR/SI Randomly check the
to address gaps ob- are prepared and details of action, re-
served during quality implemented as per sponsibility, time line
ME G4.3 assurance process internal/state/na- and feedback mecha-
tional/surveillance nism
assessment record
findings
Planned actions are Check PDCA or RR/SI Check actions have
implemented through relevant quality been taken to close the
Quality Improvement method is used to gap. It can be in form of
ME G4.4
Cycles (PDCA) take corrective and action taken report or
preventive action Quality Improvement
(PDCA) project report
116 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Standard
The facility seeks continual improvement by practising Quality method and tools
G5
The facility uses Basic quality im- RR/SI PDCA & 5S
method for quality provement method
ME G5.1
improvement in ser-
vices
Advance quality im- RR/SI Six sigma, lean
provement method
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
3. Frequency of peri-
odic medical check-up
for occupationally
acquired diseases
4. Provision for ad-
ditional personnel
protection for workers
dealing with reagents
& material with carcin-
ogens, toxins, chemi-
cals, etc.
5. Specific measures
taken to ensure proper
and adequate perfor-
mance of protective
equipment, such as
fume hoods.
Risk Management Check if responsi- RR/SI Review risk man-
framework defines bilities for identify- agement framework
the responsibilities ing and managing delineation of respon-
for identifying and risk has been de- sibilities amongst staff
managing risk at each fined and commu- for identifying the risk
ME G7.2 level of functions nicated in their work area and
their management.
Verify with the staff
members if they are
aware of their respon-
sibilities
Risk Management Check if process of RR/SI Review risk manage-
Framework includes reporting risks and ment framework for
process of reporting hazards have been process of reporting
ME G7.3
incidents and poten- defined incidents including
tial risk to all stake- near miss and potential
holders risks
A comprehensive list Check if list of RR/SI 1. Review risk man-
of current and po- existing and poten- agement framework in-
tential risk including tial risk have been cludes list of identified
potential strategic, prepared current and potential
regulatory, operation- risks. These may
al, financial, environ- include hazard safety,
mental risks has been strategic, financial,
ME G7.4
prepared statutory, operational
and environmental
risks.
2. The laboratory
prioritize and act on
identified risks.
3. Actions taken to
118 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
address risks is based
on potential impact on
laboratory examina-
tion results, as well as
patient and personnel
safety
Modality for staff Check training on RR/SI Verify with the training
training on risk man- risk management records. Training and
agement is defined has been providesd information impart-
ME G7.5 to key staff mem- ed to the staff on the
bers hazards of chemicals
in their work areas and
related information.
Risk Management Check risk manage- RR/SI Check with the records
Framework is re- ment framework is that quality team/ risk
viewed periodically reviewed at least management commit-
ME G7.6
once in a year tee reviews the frame-
work at least once in a
year
Standard The facility has established procedures for assessing, reporting, evaluating
G8 and managing risk as per Risk Management Plan
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Periodic assessment Check if periodic RR/SI Verify with the assess-
for Physical and Elec- assessment of Phys- ment records. Compre-
trical risks is done as ical and electrical hensive of physical and
ME G8.2
per defined criteria safety risk is done electrical safety should
using the risk as- be done at least once in
sessment checklist three month
Periodic assessment Check periodic as- RR/SI 1. Identify the risk
for Chemical and Bio- sessment of chem- group category
logical hazard is done ical Hazard is done 2. Check comprehen-
as per defined criteria periodically sive assessment of both
ME G8.3
manmade and natural
chemical hazardous
event is done at least
once in year
Check periodic as- RR/SI 1. Identify the risk
sessment of Biolog- group category
ical Hazard is done 2. Check comprehen-
periodically sive assessment of bi-
ological hazard is done
at least once in year
Periodic assessment Check periodic as- RR/SI Check comprehensive
for potential disasters sessment of poten- assessment of both
including fire is done tial disaster is done manmade and natural
ME G8.4
as per defined criteria periodically potential disaster is
done at least once in
year
Check periodic as- RR/SI Verify with the records.
sessment of testing A comprehensive risk
area and staff safety assessment of all test-
risk is done using ing processes should
defined checklist be done using pre-de-
periodically fined criteria at least
once in three month.
Risks identified are Check if various RR/SI Risk identified should
analysed evaluated risks identified be listed and evaluated
and rated for severity during the risk as- for their security and
sessment proceeds frequency for occur-
are formally evalu- rence. A risk severity
ME G8.5
ated score / grade should be
given to each risk iden-
tified and according
gaps should be rated.
Verify with the records
120 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Identified risks are Check if risk have RR/SI Check risks are pri-
treated based on se- high severe are oritized base on their
ME G8.6
verity and resources prioritised. severity rating. Verify
available with the records
A risk register is Check if a risk regis- RR/SI Check hospital admin-
maintained and up- ter is maintained istration/ responsible
dated regularly to re- committee maintains a
cord identified risks, risk register which risk
their severity and identified, their sever-
ME G8.7 actions to be taken ity, action to be taken
to mitigate risk and
follow up action
Check for risk regis-
ter has been updated
timely
Stan-
The facility has established system for patient and employee satisfaction
dards G9
Patient and Employee There is a designat- RR/SI
Satisfaction surveys ed person to co-or-
ME G9.1
are conducted at peri- dinate satisfaction
odic intervals survey
Patient feedback RR/SI/PI 1. Form is available in
is taken at regular local language
intervals 2. Sample is adequate
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
Results of Patient RR/SI
satisfaction survey
are recorded and
disseminated to
concerned staff
There is procedure RR/SI Root cause analysis is
for analysis of Em- done
ployee satisfaction
survey
There is procedure RR/SI Root cause analysis is
for analysis of clini- done and action plan is
cian's feedback prepared
The facility prepares There is proce- RR/SI
the action plans for dure for preparing
ME G9.3 the areas of low satis- Action plan for
faction improving patient
satisfaction
There is procedure RR/SI
to take corrective
and preventive
action
There is procedure RR/SI
for preparing action
plan for improving
employee satisfac-
tion
Area of Concern - H Outcome
Standard The facility measures Productivity Indicators and ensures compliance
H1 with State/National benchmarks
Facility measures pro- No. of Haematology RR Within the hospital and
ME H1.1 ductivity Indicators test done per 1000 from peripheral health
on monthly basis population facilities
No. of Biochemistry RR Within the hospital and
test done per 1000 from peripheral health
population facilities
No. of Serology RR Within the hospital and
test done per 1000 from peripheral health
population facilities
No. of Clinical RR Within the hospital and
Pathology test done from peripheral health
per 1000 popula- facilities
tion
122 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
No. of histopathol- RR Within the hospital and
ogy & cytology from peripheral health
test done per 1000 facilities
population
Standard The facility measures Efficiency Indicators and ensure compliance with State/National
H2 benchmarks
Percentage of test RR
failed in EQAS/PT/
any other
No of IQC failures RR
Turnaround time RR
for emergency lab
investigations
Turnaround time RR
for routine lab
investigations
Turnaround time RR
for receiving the
samples from pe-
ripheral labs in case
of emergency
Downtime of RR
critical equipment
breakdown
National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories 123
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
The facility endeav- Trends analysis RR
ours to improve its of Indicators is
ME H2.2 efficiency indicators done at Periodic
to meet the bench- Intervals
mark
Standard The facility measures Clinical Care & Safety Indicators and ensure compliance with
H3 State/National benchmarks
No of missed criti- RR
cal alerts
Number of sharp RR
exposure or other
occupational inju-
ries reported
Percentage of RR
P-forms going into
L-forms
Percentage of RR
Outbreaks detected
by routine labora-
tory-based surveil-
lance
124 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Assess-
Refer- Compli-
Measurable Element Checkpoint ment Means of Verification
ence No. ance
Method
The facility endeav- Trends analysis RR
ours to improve its of Indicators is
ME H3.2 clinical care & safety done at Periodic
indicators to meet the Intervals
benchmark
Standard The facility measures Service Quality Indicators and ensure compliance with
H4 State/National benchmarks
Facility measures Ser- Waiting time at RR Time motion study/
ME H4.1 vice Quality Indica- sample collection turnaround time
tors on monthly basis area
Waiting time at re- RR
port receiving area
List of Contributors
Sl. No. Name Designation
1. Shri Apurva Chandra Secretary, Health & FW, MoHFW
2. Ms Aradhana Patnaik Additional Secretary & Mission Director (NHM), MoHFW
3. Maj Gen (Prof) Atul Kotwal Executive Director, NHSRC
4. Dr. Neha Garg Director, NHM-II, MoHFW
5. Dr. J N Srivastava Advisor, QPS, NHSRC
6. Dr. Ashoke Roy Ex Director, RRC-NE
7. Dr. Raj Prabha Moktan Director, RRC-NE
8. Dr. Kaustubh S. Giri Deputy Secretary - NHM
9. Dr. Tamanna Sharma Lead Consultant, MoHFW
10. Dr. Anil Kumar Gupta Lead Consultant, MoHFW
11. Ms Stella Grace Consultant, MoHFW
Expert Group Members
1. Dr (Col) Jyoti Kotwal Prof & HoD, Dept. of Haematology and Clinical Pathology, Sir
Gangaram Hospital, New Delhi
2. Dr. Naresh Goel DDG (LS & IEC), NACO(Ret.)
3. Wg Cdr Smita Rani HOD, Pathology, AFCME
4. Dr. Purva Mathur Prof. Laboratory Medicine, JPN Apex Trauma Centre, AIIMS,
New Delhi
5. Dr. Sanjay Mishra Regional Director Health Services, Jabalpur Division, MP
6. Dr. Renu Gupta Assistant Professor, Microbiology, IHBAS Hospital, Delhi
7. Dr. Abhyuday Shakti Tiwari Nodal Officer HAMAR Lab, OSD-NHM, Chhattisgarh
8. Dr. Kailash Chand Jat Laboratory Head, DH Sikar, Rajasthan
9. Dr. Juhee Chandra HoD, Dept. of Clinical Pathology, Jeevan Anmol Hospital, New
Delhi
10. Dr. Mayank Dwivedi Public Health Specialist, Laboratory Advisor, CDC
11. Dr. Indranil Roy Public Health Specialist, Laboratory Advisor, CDC
12. Dr. Ranjan Kumar Chaudhary Advisor, HCT
13. Ms. Mona Gupta Advisor, HRH-HPIP
14. Dr. K Madan Gopal Advisor, PHA
15. Dr. Deepika Sharma Lead Consultant, QPS, NHSRC
16. Dr. Arpita Agrawal Sr Consultant, QPS, NHSRC
17. Dr. Naveen Kumar Consultant, QPS, NHSRC
18. Dr. Annapoorna K N Consultant, QPS, NHSRC
National Health Systems Resource Centre (NHSRC) and RRC-NE team
1. Mr. Anjaney Shahi Lead Consultant, HCT
2. Ms. Vinny Arora Lead Consultant, Certification Unit
126 National Quality Assurance Standards for Integrated Public Health Laboratories
Bibliography
1. Operational Guidelines for Improving Quality in Public Healthcare Facilities, 2021
2. Operational Guidelines for Pradhan Mantri Ayushman Bharat Health Infrastructure Mission, October 2
4. Free Diagnostics Service Initiative (FDSI),2015 & 2019 Ministry of Health and Family Welfare,
Government of India
5. Guidelines on Integrated Public Health Laboratories, 2022, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare,
Government of India
7. WHO Handbook Good Laboratory Practices (GLP), Quality practices for regulated non -clinical research
and development.
8. Indian Public Health Standards, 2022, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India
9. ISO 15189: 2022 Medical laboratories - Requirements for quality and competence
10. LIFE (Laboratory Improvement for Excellence) National initiative for District Hospital Laboratory
Quality Improvement.
11. Manual for Laboratory Diagnosis of common epidemic prone disease for District Public Health is a
Laboratories, IDSP, NCDC
12. Manual of Laboratory Techniques for District Public Health Laboratories, NICD, DGHS, GoI
13. NABL 112 document June 2019-Specific Criteria for Accreditation of Medical Laboratories
15. National guidelines for infection prevention and control in healthcare facilities, National Centre for
Disease Control, 2020
16. Laboratory Safety Guidance by Occupational Safety and Health Administration U.S. Department of
Labor 2011