UNIT 5 Human Values and Professional Ethics
UNIT 5 Human Values and Professional Ethics
UNIT – 5
1. HUMAN VALUES
Basic human values refer to those values which are at the core of being human. The values which
are considered basic inherent values in humans include truth, honesty, loyalty, love, peace, etc.
because they bring out the fundamental goodness of human beings and society at large.
The five human values which are expected in all human beings, irrespective of whether they are
employees or not in whichever profession or service, are:
Right Conduct – Contains values like self-help skills (modesty, self-reliance, hygiene
etc.), social skills (good behavior, good manners, environment awareness etc.), ethical skills
(courage, efficiency, initiative, punctuality etc.) and Ownership.
Peace – Contains values like equality, focus, humility, optimism, patience, self-
confidence, selfcontrol, self-esteem etc.
Truth – Contains values like accuracy, fairness, honesty, justice, quest for knowledge,
determination etc. Peaceful co-existence – Contains values like psychological (benevolence,
compassion, consideration, morality, forgiveness etc.) and social (brotherhood, equality,
perseverance, respect for others, environmental awareness etc.)
Discipline – Contains values like regulation, direction, order etc. Human values are
integral part of one’s personality and affects employability quotient. Many employers are
inclined to hire those who have better human values. K
2. ETHICS
Put simply, ethics refers to a sense of right and wrong. Societies have their ethical norms,
sometimes embodied in laws that prohibit activities deemed unethical, and sometimes more a
matter of traditions that consider some behaviors acceptable and others unacceptable.
Individuals usually have a personal sense of ethics, partly molded by social norms and shaped
by family, religion and a person's own intellectual and moral development.
3. PROFESSIONAL ETHICS
Professional ethics are principles that govern the behaviour of a person or group in a
business environment. Like values, professional ethics provide rules on how a person should
act towards other people and institutions in such an environment.
Businesses large and small also operate in an ethical environment. When the practices of a
business as a whole or of individual employees involve behaviors that some may find
unacceptable, then ethical conflicts can arise.
There are also many examples of strong ethical commitments going hand-in-hand with long-
term profitability. Chick-fil-A is well-known for closing its restaurants every Sunday. The
practice is an important reflection of the company's ethical and religious principles. However,
closing one day a week hasn't prevented Chick-fil-A from operating a profitable and growing
business.
Propriety
Along with varying religious practices come different levels of what people may or may not
feel is appropriate. For this reason, many employers have policies forbidding foul language and
swearing to prevent offense--and often because it's considered unprofessional. Similarly, HR
best practices include employees not talking about people of other faiths in derogatory terms.
Sentences that start with "Those Christians..." or "Those Muslims..." are workplace bombs
waiting to go off.
Hiring Practices
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discriminatory hiring practices based on religion.
Today, the body of employment regulations that stem from this law and several others created
during the same time period are enforced by the federal Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission as well as the Texas Workforce Commission. Employers must consider
candidates based on their qualifications and abilities and not religious affiliation. Likewise, it
is illegal to ask a job candidate about his or her religious affiliation or beliefs.
Religious Accommodation
Federal law also requires employers to make reasonable religious accommodation for
employees. This may mean not requiring a devout Christian to work Sundays or allowing a
Muslim female employee to wear a head scarf with her uniform. To the largest extent possible,
employers should grant time off for people to celebrate important religious holidays that don't
coincide with public or company holidays. Many times Seventh Day Adventists and Orthodox
Jews ask to leave early on Friday evenings during the winter so they can be home to begin their
Sabbath observances at sundown.
Assumptions
In a diverse workplace, making assumptions about others' religious backgrounds can be a
mistake. For example, wishing employees a "Merry Christmas" may overlook that the person is
Jewish, Hindu, Muslim, Buddhist, Taoist or something else altogether. Similarly, assuming
that someone is a particular faith because of his or her ethnic background can be incorrect and
possibly insulting. Many Asians are Christian, many African Americans are Muslim and many
Iranians are Jewish or Christian. Assumptions can cause offense and even give the impression
of racism.
Training
Many companies head off problems or reduce biases with diversity training. Good ones have
exercises and activities designed to help people see past the differences and look at the
commonalities between people. In many cases, employees and managers learn things they
never knew about other people's religions and cultures. This may not only reduce tension, but
foster understanding and camaraderie.
In this environment, employees who might otherwise be afraid to voice their opinion feel
encouraged to contribute, which is how good teams become excellent. Companies that foster an
environment of trust, ethical behavior, integrity, and excellence are also better prepared to deal
with unforeseen challenges because they have a very strong foundation to stand on.
To see why ethical behavior is so important, we don’t need to look further than at the recent so-
called Weinstein effect, which is a term that’s used to describe a worldwide wave of sexual
abuse allegations against film producer Harvey Weinstein, which eventually gave rise to the
#MeToo campaign. After it spent months looking for a buyer or investor, The Weinstein
Company was eventually forced to file for bankruptcy because nobody wanted to touch it.
#3. Helps remain in compliance with laws and regulations
According to the landmark Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, also known as the Public Company
Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act, all individuals serving on boards and
organizational leaders of public companies are required to have a code of ethics to make major
corporate scandals like Enron and WorldCom less likely to happen.
Any promises a company makes and fails to comply with can make it amenable to sue for breach
of contract, so companies that implement a code of conduct have a strong incentive to ensure
ethical treatment of its employees, clients, partners, as well as the public.
“In the interest of fostering an open and welcoming environment, we as contributors and
maintainers pledge to making participation in our project and our community a harassment-free
experience for everyone, regardless of age, body size, disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics,
gender identity and expression, level of experience, education, socio-economic status,
nationality, personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and orientation,” states the
Contributor Covenant.
A code of ethics or code of conduct is a written collection of the rules, principles, values, and
employee expectations, behavior, and relationships that an organization considers significant and
believes are fundamental to their successful operation. It provides a framework and a standard
for ethical decision making within the organization. In addition to its importance within the
organization, the code of ethics may inform customers, vendors, and other external stakeholders
what is valued by the organization, its management, and employees. The effectiveness of an
organization’s code of ethics depends heavily on whether management supports and follows the
code and how employees who break the code of ethics are treated.
A code of ethics can be written in a number of different ways, depending on the organization, its
internal mode of operation, and management style. Most commonly, a code of ethics is written
by the executive team or by a cross-section of employees from various functions. At times, it is
also designed by staff members from specific departments, such as organizational development,
corporate communications, marketing, and/or human resources. The more stakeholders who are
involved in writing the code of ethics, the more likely it is to be integrated into the organization’s
culture.
Most companies do not have—or need—a full-time ethics officer, so human resources may be
viewed as the keeper of the company ethics. HR is often involved in establishing a code of ethics
and may take a lead role in communication, training, and enforcement.
Training. Training employees is key to the successful adoption of a code of ethics. The
organization is instructing employees how it wants them to act when faced with potential ethical
issues. Training should be based on the code itself. What does the company expect of
employees? For example, when ethics conflict with getting the job done on time or on budget,
what is the company’s position on what an employee should do? What resources are available to
employees if they are faced with an ethical dilemma? A guideline or flowchart of the decision
making process should be provided to help employees work through their issues. Practical
application of the code should be discussed using hypothetical situations.
Personal character is the key building block of an effective code of ethics. The company should
strive to hire individuals with high moral standards and expect every employee to act in an
ethical manner in all company matters. When employees act with integrity and have appropriate
company guidance and support to work though “sticky” situations, the decisions made are likely
to be ethical ones.
In the end, ethics is a matter of corporate culture. Organizations must set high expectations
through their codes of ethics and then live to those high standards, making them an integral part
of the corporate culture. When management considers the code of ethics important, regularly
affirms their content through words and actions, and publicly reprimands rule breakers, codes of
ethics are more readily integrated into the fabric of the organization and are more effective.
9. ETHICAL CHALLENGES
This would be a review machine, so I’d love to hear your opinion on the machine and OS. Full
disclosure, while I hope you will blog about your experience with the PC, you don’t have to.
Also, you are welcome to send the machine back to us after you are done playing with it, or you
can give it away to your community, or you can hold on to it for as long as you’d like. Just let me
know what you plan to do with it when the time comes. And if you run into any problems let me
know. A few of the drivers aren’t quite final, but are very close.
Clearly, Microsoft was hoping to encourage reviews of Vista and wanted to make sure that the
bloggers experienced Vista on a high-end machine that would optimize performance. Did they
also hope to influence the bloggers’ opinions of the company along the way?
Sending the gift to bloggers was a risky marketing tactic even without the ethical question.
Culturally, bloggers are a highly influential group of people with strong opinions, which they
share openly to a wide audience. Many of the recipients reacted to the gift by sharing the news of
the promotion and their opinions about it. A broad range of ethical issues emerged from the
discussions in the blogosphere. Below are several excerpts.
The Gifts Diminish Trust in the Reviewers
“Now that I know these guys (any gals?) have access to a tailored laptop, preloaded, etc., I know
their wisdom is no longer that of The Crowd—I suspect it is going to be tainted (even if not the
case), so I have already discounted them. And, since I don’t know who has and has not had the
gift, I will distrust them all on this subject!” [ Comments by the blogger on receiving the gift]
Another blogger shared the disclosure concern while supporting the promotion:
“That is a GREAT idea. After all, how can anyone have a decent conversation about Windows
Vista without having put a bunch of time on one of the machines? Now, regarding blogger
ethics. Did you disclose? If you did, you have ethics. If you didn’t, you don’t. It’s that black-and-
white with me.”
Three Dimensions of Evaluating Gifts
The Microsoft example provides a three-dimensional framework by which to evaluate whether a
gift crosses the line into bribery. (Remember that a bribe is something given to induce someone
to alter their behavior—in this case, to write a favorable product review.) The framework helps
establish guidelines for keeping business gifting aboveboard.
CONTENT
The chief problem with Microsoft’s gift was the content. Content refers to the nature of the gift
itself (a shiny, new, top-of-the-line laptop) and the price ($2,000 or more). The company claimed
that such a high-end machine was necessary to showcase the full capability of the Windows
Vista operating system. And, they asserted, since the bloggers were given the option of returning
the laptops (or giving them away), the issue of bribery didn’t come into play and the onus of
acting ethically fell to the recipients.
Nonetheless, Microsoft’s actions represented a departure from standard industry practice of
sending preview disks of software to opinion-makers. While it might be acceptable to give out
$2,000 gifts in other industries (like sending out expensive fashion clothing to movies stars), and
one can dicker about whether $2,000 is or isn’t too extravagant, the point is that Microsoft broke
with the conventions of its own industry.
The key lesson is that what is being given defines the nature of gifting, and extreme care must be
taken to determine whether that gift is appropriate. While the market price of a gift item can be
used as a benchmark, the type of gift is as important as its price. If Microsoft had given out
$2,000 worth of software, it wouldn’t have been so controversial. Another point, which
Microsoft surely knew, is that items sent around Christmastime are more apt to be perceived as
gifts.
CONTEXT
The other objection to the Microsoft gifts was the company’s motives for giving them. People
argued that Microsoft sent the expensive laptops to bloggers as a quid pro quo. Though the
accompanying email said “you don’t have to write about Vista,” that was mainly a legal
disclaimer meant to protect Microsoft against formal bribery charges (U.S. corruption law
prohibits corporate gifts designed to induce action by the recipient). The company may have kept
itself out of legal hot water, but it remained vulnerable to the charge that it tried to exert
psychological pressure on the bloggers to write about their “pleasurable” experiences with Vista.
The other argument was that laptops were given to the bloggers so that they would lack the
proper testing environment of mainstream tech journalists. The bloggers were set up to write
good things about Vista by seeing it function in a brand-new machine, tuned and tested for this
purpose by Microsoft engineers. The experience of actual users—who might be influenced by
these bloggers’ opinions—would be different, since they would have to install the software on
older machines with no help from Microsoft. Critics argued that the company’s promotion was
intended to create a false opinion of the market.
While most businesses define what is a bribe and what isn’t in terms of the content of the gift, in
most countries the matter is decided on the basis of context. So, regardless of the size, type, and
value of the gift, if it can be established that the gift was given with the intent to induce an
action, it will be regarded as a bribe. The lesson here is that it isn’t enough for businesses to set
clear value/type limits on corporate gifts; it’s also necessary to scrutinize the motives behind the
gift giving, think carefully about how the gift will be received, and stop short of anything that
induces the recipient to crosses the line of ethical behavior.
CULTURE
Other critics held that Microsoft’s blunder was not caused by the content or context of the gifts
but that the company fundamentally misunderstood the culture of blogging. This view came
primarily from marketing practitioners, who pointed out that giving the laptops to
elite bloggers violated the egalitarian and sponsorship-free nature of social media. It’s a culture
whose members loathe any kind of commercial taint to their independence and are highly
sensitive to charges of “selling out.”
Thus, culture is clearly the third very important aspect of gift giving. It’s crucial to establish clear
boundaries and protocols so that gifts are truly received as gifts—not as attempts to influence. To
do that means factoring in the recipient’s mindset and culture, since what may be perceived as a
gift in one group may seem like a bribe in another. The “cultural” dimension is easily understood
in personal gift giving (a toy truck might be an excellent present for your six-year-old nephew,
but it wouldn’t be appropriate for your boss or grandparent). Yet, somehow the idea of
discretionary gift giving hasn’t gained much ground in business. However, understanding the
cultural preferences of the receiver is obviously an important issue in international business.
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES – ONLY FOR REFERENCE
ETHICAL CHALLENGES
In a perfect world, it’s always clear what’s right or wrong. In the real world, things are often not
so clear. Someone’s wrong can be your right, which means your right will definitely, at some
point, be someone else’s wrong. Most of the time, the “right” choice is subjective. In business,
many of these ethical challenges appear in the form of bribes, conflicts of interest, issues of
honesty and integrity, and whistle-blowing.
Bribery
Bribery is the act of giving money, goods, or other forms of compensation to a recipient in
exchange for an alteration of their behavior (to the benefit/interest of the giver) that the recipient
would otherwise not alter. Many types of payments or favors can constitute bribes: tips, gifts,
favors, discount, waived fees, free foods, free advertising, free trips, free tickets, donations,
campaign contribution, sponsorship/backing, higher paying job, stock options, secret
commission, or promotions. The key to identifying bribery is that it is intended to alter the
recipients behavior.
The simplest form of bribery: a parent who tells a child that if he behaves while at the grocery
store, he will get ice cream or a toy. This is a common and mostly harmless form of bribery, but
does it set the tone for expecting a future favor in exchange for good behavior? In business,
bribery can be very subtle. Consider the following example:
You are the purchasing manager for a manufacturing company. There are several suppliers from
whom you can purchase component parts used in the production of your finished product. One of
the supplier representatives comes by every Monday morning with biscuits for you and your
staff. He calls you on occasion and offers you tickets to sold-out sporting events and sends a
lavish gift basket every Christmas. Is this just good business on his part, building a personal
relationship with you and your staff, or is there an expectation that, in exchange for his
generosity, you will select his company’s product over the competition— even though he’s not
the most cost-effective choice? Are you taking a bribe when you accept the football tickets?
These small “tokens of appreciation” can be construed as bribes, and as a result, many
companies prohibit their employees from accepting gifts from suppliers and vendors.
One of the challenges in determining whether or not someone has taken a bribe or simply
accepted a gift is that the social and cultural norms governing bribery and gift giving can differ
from place to place. Certain monetary transactions are acceptable and appropriate in some
cultures but not in others. For example, political campaign contributions in the form of cash are
considered criminal acts of bribery in some countries, but in the United States, as long as they
adhere to election law, they’re legal. Tipping is considered bribery in some societies, but in
others the two concepts are very different.
Kickback
A kickback is a form of negotiated bribery in which a commission is paid to the bribe-taker in
exchange for services rendered. Generally speaking, money, goods, or services handed over are
negotiated ahead of time. The kickback varies from other kinds of bribes in that there is implied
collusion between agents of the two parties, rather than one party extorting the bribe from the
other. The purpose of the kickback is usually to encourage the other party to cooperate in the
illegal scheme.
Consider the following case of a former Fannie Mae employee, Armando Granillo:
Before dawn one hazy March day in L.A., Granillo pulled his SUV into a Starbucks near
MacArthur Park, where he planned to pick up an envelope full of cash from an Arizona real-
estate broker, federal investigators say.
Granillo, a foreclosure specialist at mortgage giant Fannie Mae, expected to drive off with
$11,200—an illegal kickback for steering foreclosure listings to brokers, authorities allege in
court records. Granillo would leave in handcuffs. And investigators are looking into assertions
by Granillo and another former Fannie Mae foreclosure specialist that such kickbacks were “a
natural part of business” at the government-sponsored housing finance company, as Granillo
allegedly told the broker in a wiretapped conversation.
Regulators keep a close watch for kickback deals as the housing market heats up and new
regulations take hold following the mortgage meltdown, which exposed widespread corruption in
the housing and lending markets. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Director Richard
Cordray said his agency has moved to shut down kickback operations not only because they’re
illegal but also because they reduce competition and increase costs to the public.
Conflict of Interest
Conflict of interest (COI) is an ethical challenge that occurs when an individual or organization
is involved in multiple interests that are at odds with one another. COI is especially problematic
in situations involving someone in a position of trust—e.g., a doctor or lawyer—who has
competing professional or personal interests. These competing interests make it hard to act on
behalf of one interest without compromising the integrity of the other. The following are some of
the most common forms of conflict of interest:
Self-dealing, in which an official who controls an organization causes it to enter into a
transaction with the official, or with another organization that benefits the official, i.e., the
official is on both sides of the “deal”.
Outside employment, in which the interests of one job contradict another.
Family interests, in which a spouse, child, or other close relative is employed (or applies
for employment) or where goods or services are purchased from such a relative or a firm
controlled by a relative. For this reason, many employment applications ask if one is
related to a current employee. In this event, the relative may be recused from any hiring
decisions. Abuse of this type of conflict of interest is called nepotism.
Gifts from friends who also do business with the person receiving the gifts (may include
non-tangible things of value such as transportation and lodging).
Consider the following example:
Margaret Hatch is a member of the Pasadena County Zoning Board that is responsible for
approving plans for commercial development in the county. The zoning board is currently in the
preliminary stages of reviewing plans proposing a new shopping center on the north end of the
county. The plans include several fast-food restaurants, a multiplex movie theater, and several
national retailers that do not have a presence in the county. Everyone on the zoning board agrees
that this shopping center could create a new “retail/service hub” that would attract business not
just from Pasadena County but from two neighboring counties, as well.
Margaret’s family owns a considerable amount of farmland adjacent to the proposed site, and
after talking with the developer, it becomes clear that future expansion of the shopping center
would require the use of her land plus two parcels she does not own. Margaret talks to her
husband, Phil, who is a real-estate broker, about the proposed development and what she
believes it will mean to the future of the area. Several days later, Phil comes home and tells
Margaret that he has spoken to the owners of the other two parcels and they are willing to
sell their land for below current market value if the sale can be closed quickly. Margaret and Phil
agree that they will use the equity line on their home to purchase the two parcels as soon as
possible.
How would the Pasadena County Zoning Board view Margaret’s actions? What will be the
consequences of their purchase of the additional parcels of land? What happens when the owners
learn that the uncultivated farmland they sold to Margaret and Phil has been rezoned to
commercial and resold to a developer? What would the State Board of Realtors say about Phil’s
actions? Is this just “being in the right place at the right time,” or is it something much less
ethical?
A code of ethics can help to minimize problems with conflicts of interest because it spells out the
extent to which such conflicts are to be avoided and what the parties should do if they do arise
(disclosure, etc.). Such codes also help raise awareness, making it less likely that professionals
can legitimately claim that they were unaware that their behavior was unethical. In addition, the
threat of disciplinary action (for example, a lawyer being disbarred) helps to minimize
unacceptable conflicts or improper acts when a conflict is unavoidable.
Honesty and Integrity
In business, sometimes ethics comes down to deciding whether or not to tell the truth. Admitting
an error, disclosing material facts, or sending a customer to a competitor are all decisions that
business people make based on issues of honesty and integrity. Because honesty and integrity are
often used in the same breath, many people believe that they are one and the same. However,
they are decidedly different, and each is important in its own way. As Professor Stephen L.
Carter of Yale Law School points out in his book Integrity, “one cannot have integrity without
being honest, but one can be honest and yet lack integrity.”
Integrity means adherence to principles. It’s a three-step process: choosing the right course of
conduct; acting consistently with the choice—even when it’s inconvenient or unprofitable to do
so; openly declaring where one stands. Accordingly, integrity is equated with moral reflection,
steadfastness to commitments, and trustworthiness.
The major difference between honesty and integrity is that one may be entirely honest without
engaging in the thought and reflection that integrity demands. The honest person may truthfully
tell what he or she believes without the advance determination of whether it’s right or wrong.
Sometimes the difference is subtle. Take the following example:
Being himself a graduate of an elite business school, a manager gives the more challenging
assignments to staff with the same background. He does this, he believes, because they will do
the job best and for the benefit of others who did not attend similar institutions. He doesn’t want
them to fail. He believes his actions show integrity because he is acting according to his beliefs,
but he fails the integrity test. The question is not whether his actions are consistent with what he
most deeply believes but whether he has done the hard work of ascertaining whether what he
believes is right and true.[7].
Companies that value honesty and integrity can expect to see those values permeate their
company culture. In such a climate, coworkers trust one another, employees view management
with less suspicion, and customers spread the word about the company’s ethical behavior.
Honest companies also don’t have to worry about getting into trouble with the IRS or the media
on account of ethical wrongdoing. Even though a company may have to give up short-term gains
in order to maintain an atmosphere of honesty and integrity, in the long run it will come out
ahead.
Read how Binta Brown made a decision to act with honesty and integrity early in her career:
Binta Niambi Brown, CEO and cofounder of Fermata Entertainment Ltd and lawyer.
Photo: Via Twitter
Fifteen years ago, hours before closing a $3 billion asset acquisition, Brown, who was a senior
associate in her late twenties, received some information that could have sabotaged the entire
deal. At the time, her partner wasn’t reachable and Brown had a choice to make: either tell her
client and risk losing the deal, or keep quiet until the papers were signed.
She chose to tell the client.
“It was early in my career,” she says. “Even if the deal had been blown up for good, honest
reasons rooted in decent integrity and morality, there’s always the fear that you’re going to
become the associate whose deal blew up, and now everybody’s talking about how the senior
person wasn’t around and you’re being Goody Two-shoes and you ruined the deal.”
After disclosing the information she uncovered to her client, Brown was able to help both sides
come to a solution, and in the end, a deal was finalized. Her ability to have good judgment, do
what she thought was right, and not let fear drive her decisions are lessons Brown has carried
with her throughout her career.
“Without question, I have repeatedly in my career seen that to be the case—just proceeding from
a place of love and integrity and looking to solve the problem and to move the ball forward, as
opposed to fear. Because usually when there’s a moral dilemma like this, the main thing that’s
getting in the way of the ability to make a good decision is that we’re motivated by our fears,”
she explains.
Her advice: “It’s the moment where we start giving in to our fears, that’s when people start
making really bad decisions that can be very hurtful and harmful to others. People are afraid their
piece of the pie is going to be cut up and given to someone else, and so that motivates some of
what you see in the business context.”[8]
Whistleblowing
A whistleblower is a person who exposes any kind of information or activity that is deemed
illegal, unethical, or not correct within an organization that is either private or public. Many
whistleblowers have stated that they were motivated to take action to put an end to unethical
practices after witnessing injustices in their businesses or organizations. In addition to ethics,
social and organizational pressure are a motivating forces. A 2012 study found that individuals
are more likely to blow the whistle when several others know about the wrongdoing, because
they would otherwise fear consequences for keeping silent.
The motivation for whistleblowing isn’t always virtuous, and the outcome isn’t always positive
either. There are cases involving employees who blew the whistle as an act of revenge against
their employer or supervisor, for instance. While it’s possible for the whistleblower to be viewed
as a “hero” for her courage and truth telling, it’s also possible to be seen as a traitor or tattletale
—as just one of the many disgruntled employees who are simply trying to get even for a
perceived but imaginary injustice. One of the barriers to whistleblowing is the belief—
widespread in the professional world—that individuals are bound to secrecy within their work
sector. Accordingly, whistleblowing becomes a moral choice that pits the employee’s loyalty to
an employer against the employee’s responsibility to serve the public interest. As a result, in the
United States whistleblower protection laws and regulations have been enacted to guarantee
freedom of speech for workers and contractors in certain situations. Whistleblowers have the
right to file complaints that they believe give reasonable evidence of a violation of a law, rule, or
regulation; gross mismanagement; gross waste of funds; an abuse of authority; or a substantial
and specific danger to public health or safety.
Some of the more notable whistleblowers in recent years include the following:[9]
2010: Cheryl D. Eckard, a GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) whistleblower, exposed
contamination problems at GSK’s pharmaceutical manufacturing operations, which led to
a $750 million settlement with the U.S. government related to civil and criminal charges
that the firm manufactured and sold adulterated pharmaceutical products. Eckard was
awarded $96 million in 2010, at that time a record for an individual whistleblower.
2012: Dr. Eric Ben-Artzi publicly came forward with his evidence of multi-billion-dollar
securities violations at Deutsche Bank. As an employee, he discovered and internally
reported serious violations stemming from the bank’s failure to report the value of its
credit-derivatives portfolio accurately.
2013: Jim Schrier, a veteran USDA meat inspector, reported clear humane-handling
violations involving market hogs at a Tyson Foods slaughter facility. After raising
concerns to his supervisor, he was sent to work at a facility 120 miles away. His wife
started a Change.org petition that has gathered more than 180,000 signatures asking the
USDA to move her husband back to his original post near their home.
2013: USDA poultry inspector Sherry Medina has collected more than 70,000 signatures
in a Change.org petition asking Tyson Foods to stop its excessive use of hazardous
chemicals in poultry processing. Medina exposed the serious health issues that she and
other inspectors have experienced while working at a Tyson plant in Albertville, Alabama.
2013: Edward Snowden is a former Booz Allen Hamilton federal contractor employee
who disclosed information regarding the NSA’s blanket surveillance of U.S. citizens
through a secretive data-mining program that collects the phone records, e-mail exchanges,
and Internet histories of hundreds of millions of people around the globe.
Whistleblowing is often the subject of heated debate and controversy. The Edward Snowden case
is a good example. Widely discussed in the media and academia, the verdict on Snowden’s
actions is still out: did he behave heroically or traitorously? Is it right to report the shady or
suspect practices of the government? How does one choose between loyalty to one’s employer
and loyalty to those affected by the employer’s (or government’s) wrongdoing? These are the
ethical challenges one faces.
10. ETHICAL CONFLICTS IN THE WORKPLACE
Many of the great philosophers and writers in history, from Aristotle to Maya Angelou, have
weighed in on the matter of ethics. Ethical considerations in the workplace arise routinely for
employees and managers, as a few ethical conflict examples should make clear.
Morality
Morality is defined as the principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good
and bad behaviour (Oxford Dictionary). What makes these questions dilemmas is an individual’s
definition of right and wrong or good and bad. However, in a time when many question our
national moral character, pondering what to do in various situations can be a positive exercise
preparing an individual for worst and best case scenarios.
Moral Dilemma
Moral dilemmas are situations in which the decision-maker must consider two or more
moral values or duties but can only honor one of them; thus, the individual will violate at least
one important moral concern, regardless of the decision. This chapter draws a distinction
between real and false dilemmas.
Ethical Dilemma
An ethical dilemma (ethical paradox or moral dilemma) is a problem in the decision-making
process between two possible options, neither of which is absolutely acceptable from an ethical
perspective. Although we face many ethical and moral problems in our lives, most of them come
with relatively straightforward solutions.
On the other hand, ethical dilemmas are extremely complicated challenges that cannot be easily
solved. Therefore, the ability to find the optimal solution in such situations is critical to
everyone.
Every person may encounter an ethical dilemma in almost every aspect of their life, including
personal, social, and professional.
A moral dilemma is a conflict in which a person must choose between two or more actions, all of
which they have the ability to do. There are moral reasons for each choice. No matter which
choice you make, someone will suffer or something bad will happen. In order to help you
understand exactly what is meant by “moral dilemma” we have provided some examples, some
of which are classic moral dilemmas.
Tell your friend, knowing you probably will not be believed and that it may ruin your friendship?
Say nothing about seeing the couple as it is none of your business; they may even have an open
relationship?
A Difficult Choice
You and your family love the beach and decide to spend a weekend at an isolated beach
cabin. Your teenage daughter often gets bored on your getaways, so you make plans to take your
niece along. As soon as you arrive, a storm is looming on the horizon and the water looks rough.
You tell the girls they can get ready to swim, but to come back and help unload the car. They are
so excited, they do not pay attention to the last part of what you say and run down to the beach to
swim. You do not realize they have done so until you hear your daughter scream. You realize
they are both caught in a strong current and might be swept out to sea. You are a good swimmer
and know you can save one of them. You have a difficult choice to make. Do you:
Save your niece first as she is a poor swimmer and will not be able to last as long as your
daughter?
Save your daughter first, because, although she is a strong swimmer and may be able to last long
enough for you to come back after saving your niece, you cannot stand the idea of losing her?
An Office Theft
You are in charge of the petty cash at the office. However, a co-worker is responsible for making
a weekly trip to the bank to make the business deposit and obtain petty cash for the following
week. In a conversation with your mutual supervisor, you are asked if the increase in the petty
cash amount was enough. You, however, have not seen any additional money. You realize your
co-worker has been pocketing the additional money. Do you:
Tell your supervisor you have neither asked for nor received any additional petty cash and that
you suspect your co-worker is pocketing the money?
Tell your co-worker your suspicions and give them a chance to pay the money back?
Say nothing and just wait to see what happens?
Midnight Death
You have worked years to be successful in your father’s business. You felt you were obligated to
take over as he worked his whole life to build the business left to him by his father. However, the
large businesses in town have seriously cut into profits and for several years you and your family
have just managed to scrape by.
Your father’s health has declined and he has been hospitalized. He has a substantial life
insurance policy that expires at midnight. If he dies before midnight, you will inherit enough
money to pursue a career you have always dreamed of and provide adequately for your
family. Do you:
Pinch the oxygen line making it possible for your Dad to die or smother him with a pillow?
Tell your Dad the problem and let him suggest a solution and go by what he says?
Do nothing as you cannot imagine living with yourself if you terminate your Dad’s life?
Get Rich
Your friend offers you an opportunity to make a great deal of money very quickly. He has
arranged to set up an off-shore account for your profits. He will not tell you exactly how he is
making this money, but you get the impression it is not exactly legal. He only wants an
investment of $500 and promises you will have enough from your minimal investment that you
will never need to work again. Do you:
Give him the $500, deciding if you don’t know how he is making it, you’re in the clear?
Demand to know the details before getting involved?
Decide you want no part of this deal, as you trust your instinct that the offer is shady and you
might even get in legal trouble?
Telling a Secret
Your friend tells you that they committed a crime. They explain that they are having trouble
sleeping at night and feel you are the only one they can trust with their confession. A few days
later, you read in the paper that someone has been arrested for your friend’s crime. Do you:
Frequently, it is the small decisions we make that truly define our moral character. What will
your answer be for the following ethical dilemmas?
When making a purchase at a local store, you are given too much change. Do you say something
or keep quiet?
You receive a package at your home that was delivered to the wrong address. The shipping label
indicates it is a favourite item that you cannot afford to purchase yourself. Do you keep it or
notify the person it was intended for?
Your neighbour leaves their dog out in all kinds of weather. The poor animal frequently looks
like it is miserable. Sometimes it is out of water and seems to be fed rarely. Do you report what
you think is happening or stay quiet?
What if you suspect your neighbour of child abuse? You are not sure if they have a fit-throwing
kid or if something is really wrong.
You are at a party or out on the town with your best friend. They have too much to drink and will
not let you drive them home. What do you do?
Your lunch keeps missing at work. You are pretty sure you know who is taking it each day. Do
you confront them, report it to your supervisor or HR, get them back by making a cat food
sandwich, or just keep quiet?
You really like your neighbours and they are a great couple. The only problem is that they throw
wild parties occasionally. You think they are into drugs, maybe even dealing. What do you do?
A friend gives you a gift for your birthday. Unfortunately, it is a type of perfume you are
extremely allergic to. Do you say something and ask for a receipt to return it, or keep quiet?
Your friend has excitedly shared that she has a new love in her life. Unfortunately, you know the
guy is a narcissistic player who only stays with a woman as long as he is getting what he wants
from the relationship. Do you try to convince her to drop him or let her learn a lesson on her
own?
You buy a pile of clothing items on sale at your favourite department store. When you get home,
you realize one of the items is not on the receipt. Do you go back to the store and pay for it or
just let it go?
You are failing a class you were required to take but totally hate. You have an on-line exam. If
you fail the exam, you will fail the class. You can cheat without anyone knowing. Do you do so
and pass the class?
Over the summer, you became friends with a person who moved to your town. You have the
same interest, like the same music and movies, and have had a great deal of fun. However, your
new friend is not attractive and very loud. When school starts, you are embarrassed by the way
your friend acts. Do you remain friends or drop the relationship?
The biggest challenge of an ethical dilemma is that it does not offer an obvious solution that
would comply with ethics al norms. Throughout the history of humanity, people have faced such
dilemmas, and philosophers aimed and worked to find solutions to them.
Refute the paradox (dilemma): The situation must be carefully analyzed. In some cases,
the existence of the dilemma can be logically refuted.
Value theory approach: Choose the alternative that offers the greater good or the lesser
evil.
Find alternative solutions: In some cases, the problem can be reconsidered, and new
alternative solutions may arise.
Courteous Speak and write clearly at a language level your audience understands
Be punctual: arrive at the workplace on time and deliver work by the
deadline
Notify those expecting you when you’re running late
Apologize for your own errors and misunderstandings
Practice active listening
Share your expertise with others and be a positive, encouraging mentor
to those entering the workplace
Ethical Avoid even small white lies and truth-stretching logical fallacies
Avoid conflicts of interest or even the perception of them
Pay for products and services as soon as possible if not right away
Respect the confidentiality of private information and decisions
Focus on what you and your company do well rather than criticize
competitors to customers and others
Follow proper grievance procedures rather than take vengeance
Be charitable whenever possible
#CIVILITY
Civility simply means behaving respectfully towards everyone you interact with. Being civilized
means following the golden rule: treat others as you expect to be treated yourself. The opposite
of civility is being rude and aggressive, which creates conflict and negatively affects productivity
in the workplace because it creates a so-called chilly climate or a toxic work environment. Such
a workplace makes people uncomfortable, miserable, or angry—not emotions normally
conducive to people doing their best work.
#SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE
In the decades you’ve been immersed in the various cultures you’ve passed through, you’ve
come to understand the (often unspoken) rules of decent social interaction. Having social
intelligence means following those rules to cooperate and get along with others, especially in
conversation. This includes reading nonverbal cues so that you know:
o How and when to initiate conversation
o When it’s your turn to speak and when to listen in order to keep a conversation going
o What to say and what not say
o How to say what you mean in a manner that will be understood by your audience
o When and how to use humour effectively and when not to
o How and when to end conversation gracefully
People who lack social intelligence, perhaps because they missed opportunities to develop
conversational skills in their formative school years, come off as awkward in face-to-face
conversation. They typically fail to interpret correctly nonverbal cues that say “Now it’s your
turn to speak” or “Okay, I’m done with this conversation; let’s wrap it up.” It’s difficult to
interact with such people either because they make you do all the work keeping the conversation
going or don’t let you speak and keep going long after you wanted it to stop, forcing you to be
slightly rude in ending it abruptly. Like any other type of intelligence, however, social
intelligence can be developed through an understanding of the principles of good conversation
(see §10.1 above) and practice.
#EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE
Like social intelligence, emotional intelligence (EI) involves being a good reader of people in
social contexts, being able to distinguish different emotions, and knowing what to do about them
with regard to others and yourself. Strong EI means knowing how a person is likely to react to
what you’re about to say and adjusting your message accordingly, and then adjusting again
according to how they actually react. Though we often hide our inner emotional state—smiling
and looking happy when we’re feeling down, or wearing a neutral “poker face” to mask our
excitement—in professional situations, EI enables us to get a sense of what others are actually
feeling despite how they appear. It involves reading subtle nonverbal signals such as eye
movements, facial expressions and fleeting micro-expressions (Ekman, 2017), posture, hands,
and body movements for how they betray inner feelings different from the outward show.
Beyond merely reading people, however, EI also requires knowing how to act, such as
empathizing when someone is upset—even if they’re trying to hide it and show strength—
because you recognize that you would be upset yourself if you were in their position
(see §10.5.3.4 below for more on empathy).
Every interaction you have is coloured by emotion—both yours and the person or people you
interact with. Though most routine interactions in the workplace are on the neutral-to-positive
end of the emotional spectrum, some dip into the red—anywhere from slightly upset and a little
sad to downright furious or suicidal. Whether you keep those emotions below the surface or let
them erupt like a volcano depends on your self-control and the situation. Expressing such
emotions in the workplace requires the good judgment represented by the 3 T’s:
Tact: Recognizing that what you say has a meaningful impact, tact involves the careful choice of
words to achieve intended effects. In a sensitive situation where your audience is likely to be
upset, for instance, tact requires that you use calming and positive words to reduce your
message’s harmful impact (see §8.3 above on negative messages). When you’re upset, tact
likewise involves self-restraint so that you don’t unleash the full fury of what you’re feeling if it
would be inappropriate. When emotions are running high, it’s important to recognize that they
are just thoughts that come and go, and that you may need some additional time to process
information when you’re in a different emotional state before communicating about it.
Timing: There’s a time and place for expressing your emotions. Expressing your anger when
you’re at the height of your fury might be a bad move if it moves you to say things you’ll later
regret. Waiting to cool down so that you can tactfully express your disappointment will get the
best results if it’s an important matter. If it’s a trivial matter, however, waiting to realize that it’s
not worth the effort can save you the trouble of dealing with the fallout of a strong and
regrettable reaction.
Trust: You must trust that the person you share your feelings with will respect your privacy and
keep whatever you say confidential or at least not use it against you.
By considering these 3 T’s, you can better manage the expression of your own emotions and
those of the people you work with and for in the workplace (Business Communication for
Success, 2015, 14.6).
Like those who lack social intelligence, those who lack emotional intelligence can often be
difficult to work with and offensive, often without meaning to be. When someone fails to
understand the emotional “vibe” of their audience (fails to “read the room”), we say that they are
“tone deaf.” This can be a sign of immaturity because it takes years to develop EI through
extensive socialization in your school years and beyond, including learning how and why people
take offense to what you say. Someone who jokes openly about another’s appearance in front of
them and an audience, for instance, either fails to understand the hurt feelings of the person who
is the butt of the joke or doesn’t care. Either way, people like this are a liability in the workplace
because their offense establishes an environment dominated by insecurity—where employees are
afraid that they’ll be picked on as if this were the elementary school playground. They won’t do
their best work in such a “chilly climate” or toxic environment.
#SOCIAL GRACES
Social graces include all the subtle behavioural niceties that make you likeable. They include
manners such as being polite, etiquette (e.g., dining etiquette), and your style of dress and
accessories. We will explore most of these in the following section, but for now we can list some
of the behaviours associated with social graces:
Saying please when asking someone to do something
Saying thank you when given something you accept
Saying no, thank you, but thanks for the offer when offered something you refuse
Complimenting someone for a something they’ve done well
Speaking positively about others and refraining from negative comments
Smiling often
Being a good listener
Of course, there is much more to social graces, but let’s focus now on specific situations in
which social graces are expressed.
#DINING ETIQUETTE
If you are invited out for a lunch by a manager, it’s probably not just a lunch. They will assess
how refined you are in your manners so that they know whether they can put you in front of
clients doing the same and not embarrass the company. Though it may not be obvious, they’ll
observe whether you use your utensils correctly, chew with your mouth closed, wait till your
mouth is empty before speaking or cover your mouth with your hand if you must speak while
chewing, and how you position your cutlery when you’re done. Why does any of this matter?
Though all of this seems like it has nothing to do with the quality of work, it shows the extent to
which you developed fastidious habits and self-awareness. Someone who chews with their
mouth open, for instance, either lacks the self-awareness to know that people tend to be
disgusted by the sight of food being chewed, or doesn’t care what people think. Either way, that
lack of self-awareness can lead to behaviours that will ruin their reputation, as well as that of the
company they represent. The University of Kansas presents a handy Dining Etiquette (School of
Business, 2001) for starters.
#DRESSING APPROPRIATELY FOR THE WORKPLACE
When we hear the word uniform, we often think of a very specific style such as what a police
officer or nurse wears. In a general sense, however, we all wear uniforms of various styles in
whatever professional or institutional environment we participate in. Dressing appropriately in
those situations and in the workplace specifically has everything to do with meeting
expectations. In an office environment, clients, coworkers, and managers expect to see
employees in either suits or a business-casual style of dress depending on the workplace. In such
situations, conformity is the order of the day, and breaking the dress code can be a serious
infraction.
Though some infractions are becoming less serious in many places because the general culture is
becoming more accepting of tattoos, piercings, and dyed hair as more and more people use these
to express themselves, you might need to be careful. Consider the following points:
Tattoos: Though a significant proportion of the population has tattoos and therefore they are
more acceptable across the board, overly conspicuous tattoos are still considered taboo. Tattoos
on the face, neck, or hands, for instance, are considered risky because of their association with
prison and gang branding. Tattoos that can be covered by a long-sleeved shirt with a collar and
slacks are a safe bet. However, if you have tattoos on your forearms depicting scenes of explicit
sex or violence, consider either getting them removed or never rolling up your sleeves if you
want to get hired and keep your job.
Piercings: Of course, earrings are de rigueur for women and acceptable on men as well.
However, earlobe stretching and piercings on the nasal septum or lips are still generally frowned
upon in professional settings. Any serious body modification along these lines is acceptable in
certain subcultures, but not in most workplaces.
Dyed hair: As with tattoos and piercings, hair dye is becoming more acceptable generally, but
extreme expression is inadvisable in any traditional workplace. Where customer expectations are
rigid (e.g., in a medical office), seeing someone with bright pink hair will give the impression of
an amateur operation rather than a legitimate health care facility.
Because conformity is the determining factor of acceptability in proper attire in any particular
workplace, the best guide for how to dress when you aren’t given a specific uniform is what
everyone else wears. Observe closely their style and build a wardrobe along those lines. If the
fashion is slacks with a belt that matches the colour of your shoes and a long-sleeve, button-up,
collared shirt for men and a full-length skirt and blouse for women, do the same (Feloni, Lee, &
Cain, 2018).
14. SEVEN MUST-KNOW NETIQUETTE RULES FOR PROFESSIONAL
BEHAVIOR
Online interactions are just as important as face-to-face ones. In our fast-paced world, chock-full
of technology, we’re communicating more virtually than ever before – whether conducting
business or not. Learning how to manage your online relationships and maintain good
“netiquette” are not only good for business they’re also good for job security.
Follow these netiquette gold standards for the good of your career:
1. Exercise the Golden Rule: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” If you
wouldn’t speak to him/her that way face to face, then don’t do it online.
2. Your Cyber Fingerprint. Remember everything you post in cyberspace is for all to see. Even if
you’ve deleted the post, text, tweet blog, email, etc., it matters not. If you’ve published it, it’s
traceable.
3. Think Twice Before You Post that Pic. At the risk of stating the obvious, avoid posting
unprofessional pictures of yourself or with co-workers unless you/they mind them being shared
with everyone. As a brand ambassador of the company, posting a picture to your Facebook,
Twitter, Instagram of you chugging a beer at a company happy hour does not reflect the
company in the best light – and you may even get canned (pun, intended).
4. Never use profanity. Period.
5. Bite you “Tongue”: Don’t post when you’re angry. Instead, take the 24-hour rule to clear your
head. This will help you refrain from saying something you’ll likely later regret. And resist the
urge to use all CAPS, as it may be interpreted as you’re shouting.
6. Less is More: Avoid going on and on to get your point across. According to a study from
Microsoft Corp., people typically lose their attention after eight seconds, showcasing the impacts
of the brain and digital media. If you want your message read, go easy on the words.
7. Shhh, It’s Confidential: Don’t, I repeat, don’t reveal company secrets such as data, competitive
advantage, intellectual property and much more. It’ll cost you your job and your credibility.
Types of Netiquettes[edit]
E-mails, mailing lists, newsletters: Greetings, a polite address, as well as a correct spelling of the
used words and phrases are a must. ...
Forums, chats and communities: Chats (chatiquette), forums, and communities often pay
attention to respectful handling and correct technical use.
IMPORTANCE OF NETIQUETTE
Netiquette (Online Etiquette) is a set of rules that encourages appropriate and
courteous online behavior. These rules are important as they promote communication
skills, prevent miscommunications, and help you understand what is socially acceptable
when working and collaborating online.
What is the golden rule for netiquette?
The golden rule of netiquette in an online class or environment is, do not do or say
online what you would not do or say offline.
Do:
Watch your tone
Digital correspondence is notoriously vague and subject to (mis)interpretation. If you’re not
careful, you could easily come across as rude, angry or sarcastic, even when that’s not your
intention. Re-read your comments before posting them to make sure the tone isn’t negative.
Use emoticons — as appropriate
Emotion icons, such as smiley faces, can help clarify your tone or intention. For example, if you
want people to know that you’re joking or emphasize that you’re not upset, a smile emoticon can
go a long way. Use them, but don’t overuse them.
Be generous & collaborative
Don’t chime in only when you need help or advice. Be an active participant in your online
community. Take the time to read and respond to other people’s posts, and provide
encouragement and information when you can.
Include a subject line
When you post on a forum, use a brief header that clearly indicates the topic you’re asking about
or commenting on.
Be friendly
Start your posts with a greeting, and sign off with your name — unless your username makes it
clear who you are.
Use good grammar & spelling
No one likes wading through sloppy, incoherent sentences. Also, using proper diction helps
make a good impression on your peers, who could well be your future references or colleagues.
Keep it short & sweet
Be clear and concise in what you post.
Don’t:
Use coarse, rough or rude language
It’s off-putting and unprofessional.
Overuse caps
Writing in all caps is generally frowned upon. You might want to use caps to draw attention to
something, but many users interpret it as being yelled at or scolded. Instead, try using asterisks
surrounding words you want to highlight.
Rely on first person
Using “I” when you talk in person is one thing, but when you do it too much online, it often
comes across as self-centred. Make a point of using “we” or “you” whenever you can; they’re
more inclusive pronouns.
Flame
Flaming is an online rant. People who flame don’t consider the opinions or feelings of anyone
else on the forum. Presenting an informed opinion in a diplomatic way is acceptable; lashing out
and forcing your preferences on others is not.
Send spam
Discussion boards, forums and online chat rooms aren’t the place to promote yourself, your
products or your own agenda. Keep your comments focussed on topics that are relevant to your
courses and program.
Overuse abbreviations
From texts to posts to instant messages, a lot of online communication is about conveying
information as quickly as possible. But using too many abbreviations can be irritating, not to
mention confusing. Algonquin College’s environment includes people from a wide range of
backgrounds and ages who have varying degrees of familiarity with digital trends. A few
common abbreviations, such as LOL (laugh out loud), are fine. Just try to minimize them and
avoid obscure abbreviations.
CONCLUSION
In this day and age, companies cannot afford to focus solely on the bottom line anymore. The
ethical aspects of doing business are becoming just as important as the financial ones, and a well-
thought-out code of ethics is emerging as a necessary prerequisite for success.