Effect of Magnetic Field On Nanofluid FR
Effect of Magnetic Field On Nanofluid FR
1051/matecconf/202033001005
ICOME’19
1 Laboratoire de Physique Quantique de la Matière et Modélisation Mathématique (LPQ3M), Université Mustapha Stambouli de
Mascara, Algeria
2 Department of mechanical engineering, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq
3 Department of Mechanical engineering, University of Najaf, Iraq
4 Laboratoire énergétique de Longwy (FJV/LERMAB), Université de Lorraine, France
Abstract. Natural convection of a magneto hydrodynamic nanofluid in a porous cavity in the presence of
a magnetic field is investigated. The two vertical side walls are held isothermally at temperatures Th and Tc,
while the horizontal walls of the outer cone are adiabatic. The governing equations obtained with the
Boussinesq approximation are solved using Comsol Multiphysics finite element analysis and simulation
software. Impact of Rayleigh number (Ra), Hartmann number (Ha) and nanofluid volume fraction (∅) are
depicted. Results indicated that temperature gradient increases considerably with enhance of Ra and ∅ but it
reduces with increases of Ha.
*
Corresponding author: aissa86@gmail.com
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
MATEC Web of Conferences 330, 01005 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202033001005
ICOME’19
(6)
(10)
(2)
The coefficient of thermal expansion of the nanofluid is
Equation of motion according to z: given by:
(11)
The dynamic viscosity of nanofluid is modeled by
Brinkman [9].
(12)
(3)
𝑅𝑅= , , ,
,
(4)
2
MATEC Web of Conferences 330, 01005 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202033001005
ICOME’19
A R=0 (19a)
2.2 Validation
In order to validate the present results, the numerical
results must be validated with the results published in the Ra=105 Ra=106
open literature. Validation with the published paper by
Sajjadi et al. [10] has been done. The results are
compared with MWCNT–Fe3O4 /water hybrid, MHD
natural convection in a porous medium and geometry
presented by Sajjadi et al. The results are illustrated in
Table 2.
Ha=0
3
MATEC Web of Conferences 330, 01005 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202033001005
ICOME’19
For different Hartmann numbers and low values of Figure 5 shows the variation in average Nusselt number
Rayleigh number, we observe (fig 2) that the conduction according to Rayleigh number (Ra=103, 104, 105, and
regime is predominant with vertical isotherms and weak 106) at different values of Hartmann number (Ha=0, 25,
clockwise circulation in the cavity. The Circulation 50 and 100) for solid volume fraction equal to 0.04. We
intensity is weaker due to the weak buoyancy forces. observe that average Nusselt number increase for various
Hartmann number with increasing of Rayleigh numbers.
Ha=50 Ha=100
10
Ha=0 f=0,04
Ha=25
Ha=50
Ha=100
8
Nuavg
6
40
Ha=25 [1]. M. Behnia, J. A. Reizes and G. De Vahl Davis, Int.
J. Numer. Methods Fluids, vol. 10, 1990.
Ha=50
Ha=100
20 [2]. C. Balaji and S. P. Venkateshan, Int. J. Heat and
Fluid Flow, vol. 14, n° 3, 1993.
axial velocity
0
[3]. H. Nouanegue, A. Muftuoglu and E. Bilgen, Int. J.
-20
Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 51, 2008.
[4]. C. Balaji, S.P. Venkateshan, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
-40 14 (3) (1993).
[5]. K. Velusamy, T. Sundararajan and K. Seetharamu,
-60
0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0
Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 123, 2001.
Y [6]. A. Mezrhab, H. Bouali, H. Amaoui, M. Bouzidi,
Appl. Energy 83 (2006).
Fig. 4: Variation of vertical velocity component along [7]. K. Khanafer, K. Vafai, M. Lightstone, Int. J. Heat
middle horizontal line of the enclosure Mass Transfer 46 (2003).
4
MATEC Web of Conferences 330, 01005 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202033001005
ICOME’19