Scribd
Upload
15 views2 pages

Eurethon 2k24 Evaluation Parameters

These are eureathon evaluation parameters

Uploaded by

Devyani Chavan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
15 views2 pages

Eurethon 2k24 Evaluation Parameters

These are eureathon evaluation parameters

Uploaded by

Devyani Chavan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

G H Raisoni College of Engineering and Management Pune

Eurethon 2k24: An Internal Hackathon for SIH-2024 Nominations


Date: 4th Sep 2024 Venue: E-316/E-322

Evaluating projects for Eurethon 2k24 thorough assessment of various aspects to ensure that
solutions are both innovative and viable. Here are key evaluation parameters to consider:

1. Innovation and Creativity


 Originality: Evaluate the uniqueness of the solution. Does it introduce a novel concept or
approach that sets it apart from existing solutions?
 Creativity: Consider how creatively the solution addresses the problem. Are there innovative
features or ideas that enhance its value and effectiveness?

2. Technical Feasibility
 Technical Complexity: Assess whether the solution demonstrates advanced technical skills and
a strong understanding of the technology involved. Is the technology used effectively and
appropriately?
 Implementation: Examine the execution of the solution. Are technical challenges well-
managed, and is the solution robust and reliable?

3. Practicality and Usability


 Real-world Applicability: Determine how practical and applicable the solution is in real-world
scenarios. How easily can it be implemented and scaled?
 User Experience: Evaluate the ease of use and accessibility of the solution. Is the design
intuitive and user-friendly for its intended audience?

4. Impact and Benefits


 Problem-Solving: Assess how effectively the solution addresses the problem statement. What
is its potential impact on the target audience or issue?
 Societal or Environmental Benefits: Consider any additional benefits the solution may provide,
such as positive social or environmental impacts.

5. Sustainability
 Long-Term Viability: Review the plan for sustaining and scaling the solution over time. Does
it include strategies for funding, resource management, and long-term impact?
 Resource Efficiency: Evaluate how efficiently the solution uses resources. Does it minimize
waste and support environmental sustainability?
6. Presentation and Communication
 Clarity: Assess how clearly the solution is presented. Are the objectives, process, and results
communicated effectively and understandably?
 Demo Quality: Evaluate the quality of the demonstration. Does it effectively showcase the
functionality and benefits of the solution?

7. Team Collaboration and Execution


 Teamwork: Consider the effectiveness of team collaboration. Was there clear communication
and a well-organized division of tasks among team members?
 Execution: Assess how well the team managed their time and resources during the hackathon.
Did they meet deadlines and deliverables?

8. Adherence to Problem Statement


 Relevance: Evaluate how closely the solution aligns with the problem statement. Does it
address all critical aspects and requirements outlined?
 Solution Accuracy: Check if the solution accurately solves the problem as defined. Is it reliable
and effective in addressing the issue?

9. Solution Readiness
 Development Stage: Assess the maturity of the solution. Is it in a prototype stage, fully
developed, or somewhere in between?
 Preparation for Implementation: Evaluate how ready the solution is for deployment. Are there
any remaining development or testing phases?

10. Solution Demonstration


 Effectiveness: Review how effectively the solution is demonstrated. Does the demo clearly
illustrate the solution’s functionality and benefits?
 Engagement: Assess how engaging and persuasive the demonstration is. Does it convincingly
show the solution’s value and potential impact?

These evaluation criteria provide a comprehensive framework for assessing projects, ensuring that
both innovative and practical aspects are considered in determining the overall value of the
solutions.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy