We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16
by at aingh College
University of delhi
History of India 1500-1600
eof ansobslacey Semen
seahgtore 7
Submited by:
Gengadhas.
Rol 22/25023
Semester“/ TV ndex
4+ Mansobdast system OL
2+ Origins oF the Mansabdari 04 02,028
8+ Appointment of zamincars 03,04
+ Coctegori eb oF Mansabdars 04,05
5 Safasy of Mansabdars 05506
6 Conditional Rank 06,07
1 Evofution oF Mansabdas? 07, 08
8-Infidduction 5F Mansabdari 0&5 09,105 11
q Refoums introduced in th Ny
lo-Importane oF Mansabdaxi 12
Ie Symbo-tic Nature oF Sawar yz
rank
= la Inereane inthe no- sf mansab 13
~dars
13+ Concfuaton L+ol
Runabdant system
Tho m, }
aha ek ae a unique system devised 6 :
bina atti ernie, ee OF the adminis eafive
pe reaeh ean o fosmed the backbone
tK oP-the mag hal empixe The
Tem tmarsab! means cank and !dat! means holdet”
eed Ampdies the poattion oF aman cin the imperial
hierarchy: However, (n due course oftinw fF came
Ho mean a fancction— an obtigation om poxt oF the
mansabdar to sender somo secvice tothe empire
retum for this sank, which fixed his calary as Well
it organised fhe maghel nobitity into numerical gracl & E
and at) mansabdaré had to mabrfain d contingent
The mansabdacy syste
tothe mughed
ot
clepencting on thers tanks*
evolved over the years and gare :
nobility anal repli tay machine a high leg ree
anfrormity and ve ularity in tts functioning»
which I's stike dy 4ohave confi buted fo .the-ernpi ses
stability and strength:
dsigins oF the Mansabdar System.
The origins oPthe mansabdasi sycfem can be tracecl
back to Chenglz Khan’s decimal system oF oaganising
armies and elividing his asmi'es From Loto 0,000 .02
These numbers were general wed foeonate the ~
tank oF the commander rather than the acta)
Number of troops maintained + The Mans abdaci
System 1S satd to have borrowed from the Jgstactari
system Followed by the lodkis and urs but
there Is no eviclence of a tink befween-the ranks
and the number oF troops maintained:
The Mansabdasi system evolved tn the administrative
system OF the Mughals: If wad over time that Hkbhar
felt the need to create euch a system an he was
Faced witha aidemma oF contro ling the nobili-
through Teles ard regalations- Moseo ves, he wished
jo create a system whereby @ petsonal bord of soree
fosm OF atlegiance cout] be created between -the
emperoe and his oPrictals - The Mansabdasi system
wos able to sotye tts dilemma anal of the same
time serve the admistrative and rephitary intesect
oF the empire +
buat Ranking Sysfem-
TRE mansab wad spt indto-two rumedcof reprecerfafiona:
the frestor the z@f rank and secoand ot sawar rank: There
jare many Interpretations regarelirg the zatand sawar
Tank+ Bfochmann, who tianlatec! the Ain-i-AkbanO38
Suggested thatzat wan a nominaltrank andsawar
Was the actual Nereb ex oF ontingents maintained
by the mansabelars - Athar ALi states that the zat
placed the mansabelar ‘man apprpnate postion inthe
mughaf hierarchy ) Whe , the sawar hightig hted the
exact respon eTbi_Lity - However, the most popelak view
fs put forward by fibduf Fel2 5 who ru gested that
zat and sawar Tro secoand category womprised of those who
maintained a greater zat than cawar but the
Sawar was equal to ormore than ong helPof thezati0S
(> Finally y those with sawas lecs than ono half of 2af-
were pat 'n the third category.
However, Acthar ALT halives thet this distinction between
the kighes and lower mansabelar wos ony convenfional
05 al owed their atlegiance -fo the king:
-|Setish Chandra has stated thet white the term mansabdlar
W08 a genetic term If was popularly used for those
holding Tanks upto 500+ Those hotding ranks between
S00 and 2500 wete catled amirs and those above
2500 were cated amit-f- wnda+ He Further cfotes thet
Mansobs above 5,000 were ysy ally meat for prices
oF blood:
Salary of the Mansabdars_
Tho salary oc the mugarara{-.talab ofeach mansabdar was
oF two types ~ peasonal 0 tofab-i- khas and coreting ert”
ot talod—i-fabinan> The most important poxt of the
elasy wos based on his zaf rankand was called talab-f~
hag , an this determined his porition in imperial
hierarchy +The secoand poxt ofthe salary wou-the talab—
Lt- tabinane and tt was tho Income based on his miditasy
ob-tigetion. og his cawar rank« The salary for the sawar
tank woathe sum tote} oF the rumuneration given to
each troopes Which wan Fixed and uni formally applicable,
whatever the number oF the Sawa rank might be-06
Tae mansabdars received their salaries ether im the
| foam oF caah o« nagd from the treasusy ores Q revenue |
grantor Jagie which woo prefecred form oF receiving
\salaries- The mansabelars whowere paid! fn.cosh wet
called the Nagdi mansabdass but there wear vest Feud
TefeCences to thenr+ The jagiss given inthe form DP salavies
lwerecatied the tankhwa jagirs- Aecording to 17e
mansab regulations 5 the value ofthe fagit hadtob@
equal to the salary of the mansabda rand waseleterrined
by -the fama os the atimated revenue tncome from the
land » 94 fs seen that-all Ljagisdars were mansabdars but
jell mansabdars were not fagisdars + The tankhwa fag te
wos not hecodi tasty and was subject qo transfer: TRe
fagtrdar was never pated in kis own fagir but
derievect revenue from his Jagir withocet havireg any
potitical and administrative power: This wat done
to preverct him Pom eleveloping moots in his jagit
conditional Rank_
Tho conditional wank o mashrut was animportant featare
ofthe Mansabdani system dasing the reign F Akbar
As a whole, the zatcan never be eccs than sawar except
under one condition when @ conditional rank ts giver ire
a situation of emergency * This wos When mansabdar wos
laaked fo undetfake a parficwlas took euch as quelling a
rebedtion. and It woo given asan additional wank with bis07
Sawar now: being greater than his zat+ However, these fanks
were oe s00n onthe expedition or seevices enced
and the nerease in sawas’ was withdeawn * dF he woe
Successful then thezatand sawar were equatedand
ha wos promoted
Evofution_ of the Mansobdaei System
Thore fs agrect deal of debate re asding the evolution
OF the Mansabdarf system, Scholars ike Moreland and
Abdu} Aziz held that-a ingle numerical ronk existed
before ftkbat, the nuumber directly dndicating the
ze ofthe cavalry consingertt that the vank- holder
was expected fo maintain: From-the Akbar period ,there
js clear evidence ofadual sanking syctemand of the
numerical gradation system which war introduced din his
uth reginat year
WH. Moretand ~ moretand. viewed! the evoludion of the
Mansobdari system as a process thatsawcyctical phases
of degeneration , Aisorganicatin reorganisation andl
rejuvenation: The wots ofthe Mansabdasi system were
traced to Chengez khan. who org anised the decimal
system of mitttasy organisation also known ay the
Tluman system: 44 was prevalent tn the maghol period
anol marked the frist phase of organisation: The secoand,08
phase 5 from post Timurto the eal cans OF Akbar’s
reign was the period oF degeneration) ae et
There was a system oP gradation oF officers but i
net numerical and tides such as bald» amiewere
givens The Next phase SF reox, anisation during Akbas"s
period sawethe Introduction ofthe system oF peal
gradation and the sawag rank> Tho fourth phase was a
period of degeneration due tothe Incompetence oF
Jahangir: The taat phase which covered Shahjahan?s
Berio tanithe Introduction oFmany new reforms L ke
the du~ aapa~sih—aapa andthe months scale reforma:
Infsocduction cfthe Mansalbd ari system
neat sys
Abdul A2i2— peje suppotted Mo retand?s view onthe date
oF the introduction of the Manoabdasi system being inthe
(th wegnal yeas: He alao exptained the theory oF the zat
and sawar ran ks-
AT Qaiser, Tefan Habib and Shireen moosvi disag teed,
with the view thet tho za# and eqawar tank were introduced
nthe Lith regna| Year oF Akbar andl put forward their
own views:
ALT Qaises - He question’ +tho above view after an
anaty gs of the statistical data on revenue inthe
fin-d-Akbaat + He dosent deny the existence oF cectain
reforms by Akbar In the «(Hh regnal year such as baghq
regrHlations: However, he doubts the existence oF arank
priov to Ak bats refon and believes thatthe dual ranks
came {nto existence only inthe 1¢th regal yeas [151814]
aa the information regarcting revenye details had not
been competed inthe uth regnad yeor “Qaisex aloo
points ouf that even the Ain mentisn’ terms Ke Fixing
the mangabs and probably both the sanks wee
introduced simuftoneouoly around 1874-75"
\Lerfan Habib- A-T Qaiser’s viewspoirsf was supported ey
Irfan Habib; who agreed with the date giver by hime
and betieved thet Abul Fazal in compit the Ust of
lofAicfals as Jate asthe toth regnal gear an giver ony
cthe zat wank and omitted the sawai’ rans oltoge-ther’
This ded Ao confusion regarding the origitt oF the
concept of the dual ranks Habtb questions’ Moreland°s
analysis ofthe Mansabdasi s ysctem. In terms of cyctica |
phased andl says Sthatall reforms ase in refotion fo
sawar rank: They were tn resporoe tothe problem oF the
Jap between the jamg and the hasit which the state
con frorcted.
Shireen. Moos vi — Shireen Moosvi provided a diffesent
nfespretation regarding the evolution ofthe Mansabd-
-ait system: she agrees with gaisars contention
| that no tank existecl before the reign oF Akbar or s fill
the seth regnal yeas- In fact on the basis oFcontemposanyaccounts she haa divided the evofution of the system
recto phases ox dandmask re nal years: she says that
“in the Fitsttdlecade of akhar’s reign evidence oPan
ink between the Sze of wntingent maintained bya
noble and the salary patd to him ais hand to fina” Thud,
She says thet dusing this phave the salaries were
fixed arbitrasi ij Sh empero¥ withoutdefin!
ony Qs och ated mitten -ebligations- The measured
|aclopted by Akbar Inthe uth Years taker. by Morefand
to Signi fy the Institution, oF numerical ranks had
not evotvedt HU now as cthere is no evidence fo
uggest tho poseibfe Way oF determining how the
This clear clemarcation andI]
en
|
| Yet the Facct remains thet the numerical graclafion was
(TF act introduced ond by Akbav and os Fas aathe
| date 4s concerned rac historians accept thatit was
(ntinduced between 159 4-18~
| Refosms Ic hanges lretroduced.in the sTheenfury
| The Mancobdari system din the (thcen funy Followi pcthe
cleath of Akbar witnessed a numbex oF new innovofiond *
| Duxaipa s{h-anpa s Tho reign Of Jahangfe witnessed a
|Femarkabte change with the Introduction of the
Hdu—aapa eth aapal! Fank: DU aapa meant doubling ofthe
tank while sh anpa means tripling of the Tank buf
mostly canes oF ly oapa were seen In his [oth regnal year,
Nohangir gave Mahabet khanthe clu-aypa eh-aapa.
[rank a6 qd mark of special distinctisn jwhichds the
earttest known incident of euch a rank, being conte reed
epor any nobfe- AA though this tradition. tasted cuciry
the velgh oF Jahangir, It wor ony under Shohfahan a
. (a Aurangzeb thet this rank wag awiascled on adarge
‘Scale:“N
ee
Tmpor-fance of Mansabdavicystem- (withregardto_
Nobility)
TRE Mansabdar system wos not simply a mihi tae Ongena
“tion system butatso an adminis:trative cyctor-Howeves
dtwos a System Which gonesacted dosti tutional cles o-fism
Tho working of this system enoured -the eubfugation oF
sthe nobles tothe stote- twas not a system clepencler{
(On the wuler but worked independent othim asthe
iefnotitution self rentricted athe posictical, mittitaay and
Fiscal} obi gation of the mansobelay- Tho rank woa.a heck
mm bis power and he could not expand begona his
prescit bed rank» The Mansabdarh system ono played|
lan important me nthe practice cf ratiying the
nobles around the king Honous arose from contribution
tothe state and these fore rank was not based or
icaate, creed religion or race: There war also some kind
OF petmanence and stability din this system due to
fnotijtutionatisation of sfote power Tre nobi-tity which
inew became an integral powit ofthe my had admintst-
ration was trana formed Crem being sernj_ aufonomoug
dmpe tia] ofPicfale to oFficjala OF he state.13
Rade Neth oF Sewn van
Anocther change that-ook pace du Fing the reign oF
7 hahjahan waa thatthe sawan tank had become symbolic
In natures However, TH - Qureshi betfeves that this
system prevailed even during the reign oF Akbar: Safish
Chandra agrees that it?s posei ble thot the sawar |
rank was cymbolic even during -the reign oF Akbar
ees the rank clenoted a cestain multiple of the
actual shosps commanded and didnt represertf the
actual number to be maintained - but if became
more profound and cystematic only dasing Shahjahan’s
tinea:
Tnesease fn the Number oF Mansabdars
Thare was @ sheer fnecease fn the number DF rmansab—
—dase tnthe Mughol state aftesthe death oF Akbar
Sofich Chandra has tiiect to explain this by arguing
chat -the initial gears sf Tahangir were marked by a
dot oF insecurity: He didn?¢ trust a number of the
nobles Prom Akbar’s dime and this atong wich the
rebetlisn by ShahTahan had competed him to create
a nobility that would be soya! 4o hircand thus be
increased the ranks oF his Favoured nobses:Gorctusfon
Tho Manooddard sy sem. mai
exist mongo-tord ox Turkish
that Finally cleveloped under Alebar was frm
complex, elaborate and oganisee| than dts predecesev¥s*
White, the escential nature and working oF this system
wos not changed undes Akbars cuccesents anumber
of new innovations were made dn the ITH century thet
helped im. refining -the detects Jn -the system Howevels
by the tine oF Jah fr and Shah Jahan the number
lof mansabdass haol tnereansed exponentially
have had rts wots in pre~
fraditions but the system
ore