0% found this document useful (0 votes)
85 views18 pages

Normal Mode 1

The document describes the normal modes method for analyzing multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) mechanical systems. It discusses: - Using mode shapes to decouple the equations of motion and diagonalize the mass and stiffness matrices - Solving the decoupled equations of motion in normal coordinates - Examples of applying the method to systems with damping, external forcing, and base excitation

Uploaded by

ballin_since89
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
85 views18 pages

Normal Mode 1

The document describes the normal modes method for analyzing multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) mechanical systems. It discusses: - Using mode shapes to decouple the equations of motion and diagonalize the mass and stiffness matrices - Solving the decoupled equations of motion in normal coordinates - Examples of applying the method to systems with damping, external forcing, and base excitation

Uploaded by

ballin_since89
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

Normal Modes Method --Mode shapes are used to decouple the equations of motion

MR KR

T T

--These operations diagonalize the stiffness and mass matrices by using the property of orthogonality of the matrices --The result is the problem written in normal coordinates transformed from our original coordinate system Example Given 2k m k m

x1 Equations of motion

x2

1 x m 2 x

3k k

k k

x1 x2

Results are
1 2

k m k 3.414 m 1 1 2.414 .414 .586

Rewrite the matrix equations on normal coordinates


T

1 q 2 q

q1 q2

where
T

M K

6.827 0 0 1.171 4 0 0 4

for k=m=1

1 6.827 0 q 0 1.171 2 q
in equation form
1 q 2 q 4 q1 0 6.827 4 q2 0 1.171

4 0 q1 0 4 q2

Thes solutions to these are already known

qi(t )
where

Ai cos it Bi sin

(1) T

qi qi

M{x (0)} MRi (1) T M{x (0)} MRi

For the system shown and x1(0)=1, x2(0)= xdot1(0)=0, xdot2(0)=0


{1 2.414} A1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 .854" .146"

6.827 1 {1 - .414} 1.171

A2

Then with Bi=0,

q1 .146" cos .586t q 2 .854" cos 3.414t


Transform the solution back to x(t)
x1( t ) x 2( t ) x1( t ) x 2( t )
(1)

q1( t )

( 2)

q 2( t ) 1 .854" cos 3.414t .414

1 .146" cos .586t 2.414

Damped Systems --Damping in MDOF systems is problematic Example Example Given 2k m k m

2c x1 Equations of motion

c x2

m 0 1 x 0 m 2 x

3c c

c x1 c x2

3k k

k x1 k x2

Natural frequencies and mode shapes are obtained as before neglecting the damping matrix
1 2

k m k 3.414 m 1 1 2.414 .414 .586

Rewrite the matrix equations on normal coordinates


T

1 q 2 q

q1 q2

q1 q2

where
T

M C K

m c k

6.827 0

0 1.171

4 0 0 4 4 0 0 4

1 6.827 0 q 0 1.171 2 q

4 0 q1 0 4 q2

4 0 q1 0 4 q2

in equation form
1 q 2 q 4c 4k q1 q1 0 6.827m 6.827m 4c 4k q2 q2 0 1.171m 1.171m
qo
di

Thes solutions to these are already known


qi ( t ) e
nit

(qo cos

di

ni o

sin

di

t)

where
(1) T

qi qi

M{x (0)} MRi (1) T M{x (0)} MRi

For the system shown and x1(0)=1, x2(0)= xdot1(0)=1, xdot2(0)=0

{1 2.414} q1

1 1 0 1 1 0 .854" .146"

6.827 1 {1 - .414} 1.171

q2

q1( t ) qi( t )

e e

nit

(.146" cos (qo cos


di

di

nit

t) qo
di

ni o

sin

di

t)

Example Given 2k m k m

c x1 Equations of motion

c x2

m 0 1 x 0 m 2 x

2c c

c x1 c x2

3k k

k x1 k x2

Natural frequencies and mode shapes are obtained as before neglecting the damping matrix
1 2

k m k 3.414 m 1 1 2.414 .414 .586

Rewrite the matrix equations on normal coordinates


T

1 q 2 q

q1 q2

q1 q2

where
T

M C K

m c k

6.827 0 3 1 4 0 0 4 1 3

0 1.171

1 6.827 0 q 0 1.171 2 q

3 1

1 q1 3 q2

4 0 q1 0 4 q2

This is a more typical case. The damping matrix is not generally similar to the stiffness matrix. --In this case, we use the damping assumption, , and simply write it in the equations of motion. in equation form
1 2 q 2 2 q
1 2

q1 q2

q1 0
2

q2

0
qo
di

These solutions to these are already known


qi ( t ) e
nit

(qo cos

di

ni o

sin

di

t)

where
(1) T

qi qi

M{x (0)} MRi (1) T M{x (0)} MRi

For the system shown and x1(0)=1, x2(0)= xdot1(0)=0, xdot2(0)=0

{1 2.414} q1

1 1 0 1 1 0 .854" .146"

6.827 1 {1 - .414} 1.171

q2

q1( t ) e qi ( t ) e

nit

(.146" cos (qoi cos


di

di

nit

t) qoi
di

ni oi

sin

di

t)

q1( t ) q 2( t )

e e

k (.05 ) .586 t m

(.146" cos .586

k 1 .052 t ) m k 1 .052 t ) m

k (.05 ) 3.414 t m

(.854" cos 3.414

Transform back to the original coordinate system

x1( t ) x 2( t )

(1)

q1( t )

( 2)

q 2( t )

Forced Vibrations --Many types of forcing conditions may be handled using the normal modes method Example Given 2k m f1(t) k c x1 Equations of motion x2 m f2(t)

m 0 1 x 0 m 2 x

2c c

c x1 c x2

3k k

k x1 k x2

f 1( t ) f 2( t )

Natural frequencies and mode shapes are obtained as before neglecting the damping matrix and forces
1 2

k m k 3.414 m 1 1 2.414 .414 .586

Rewrite the matrix equations on normal coordinates


T

1 q 2 q

q1 q2

q1 q2

f 1( t ) f 2( t )

where
T

M C K F

m c k

6.827 0 3 1 4 0 0 4 1 3

0 1.171

1 2.414 1

f 1( t )

.414 f 2( t )

Resume here
m 6.827 0 1 q 1.171 2 q 0 c 3 1 1 q1 3 q2 k 4 0 q1 f 1( t ) 2.414f 2( t ) f 1 .414f 2 0 4 q2

This is a more typical case. The damping matrix is not generally similar to the stiffness matrix. --In this case, we use the damping assumption, , and simply write it in the equations of motion. in equation form
1 2 q 2 2 q
1 2

q1 q2

q1 f 1 2.414f 2
2

q2

f 1 .414f 2

The solutions to these are already known for each type of force Example: Use f 1(t ) 1# sin 4t , =.01 then
1 2(.586k / m)1 / 2 (.01)q1 .586 q 2 2(3.414k / m)1 / 2 (.01)q 2 q k 1# q1 m m6.827# s 2 / in k 1# 3.414 q 2 m m1.171# s 2 / in

the solutions are of the form

qi( t )

fi / ki [(1 ri ) (2 ri) 2 ]1 / 2
2 2

setting k=1, m=1


q1( t ) 1# / 4# / in
2

4 [(1 )2 2 (.766) q1( t ) .0095"sin 4t q 2( t ) ( .414)

4 2 1/ 2 (2(.01)( )) ] .766 1# / 4# / in
2

sin 4t

4 [(1 )2 2 (1.85) q 2( t ) .028"sin 4t

4 2 1/ 2 (2(.01)( )) ] 1.85

sin 4 t

TRANSFORM BACK
x1( t ) x 2( t ) x1( t ) x 2( t )
(1)

q1( t )

( 2)

q 2( t ) 1 q 2( t ) .414

1 q1( t ) 2.414

Example Same system, f2(t)=step defined below f2(t) 2# t

Given 2k m f1(t) k c x1 Equations of motion x2 m f2(t)

m 0 1 x 0 m 2 x

2c c

c x1 c x2

3k k

k x1 k x2

f 1( t ) f 2( t )

Natural frequencies and mode shapes are obtained as before neglecting the damping matrix and forces
1 2

k m k 3.414 m 1 1 2.414 .414 .586

Rewrite the matrix equations on normal coordinates


T

1 q 2 q

q1 q2

q1 q2

f 1( t ) f 2( t )

where
T

M C K F

m c k

6.827 0 3 1 4 0 0 4 1 3

0 1.171

1 2.414 1

f 1( t )

.414 f 2( t )

Resume here
m 6.827 0 1 q 1.171 2 q 0 c 3 1 1 q1 3 q2 k 4 0 q1 f 1( t ) f 2( t ) 2.414f 1 .414f 2 0 4 q2

This is a more typical case. The damping matrix is not generally similar to the stiffness matrix. --In this case, we use the damping assumption, , and simply write it in the equations of motion. in equation form
1 2 q 2 2 q
1 2

q1 q2

q1 f 1 f 2
2

q 2 2.414f 1 .414f 2

The solutions to these are already known for each type of force Use f 1(t ) 1# sin 4t , =0, f2(t)= step function then
1 2(.586k / m)1 / 2 (.01)q1 .586 q 2 q 2(3.414k / m)1 / 2 (.01)q 2 k f2 q1 m 6.827# s 2 / in k .414f 2 3.414 q 2 m 1.171# s 2 / in

the solutions are of the form


qi( t ) P [1 cos it ] k

setting k=1, m=1, =0


1# [1 cos .766t ] 4# / in 1# q 2( t ) .414 [1 cos1.85t ] 4# / in q1( t )

If damping is a factor, numerically integrate the integral

TRANSFORM BACK
x1( t ) x 2( t ) x1( t ) x 2( t )
(1)

q1( t )

( 2)

q 2( t ) 1 q 2( t ) .414

1 q1( t ) 2.414

Base Excitation Given 2k y(t) c x1 Equations of motion c x2 m f1(t) k m f2(t)

m 0 1 x 0 m 2 x

2c c

c x1 c x2

3k k

k x1 k x2

f 1( t ) f 2( t )

Natural frequencies and mode shapes are obtained as before neglecting the damping matrix and forces
1 2

k m k 3.414 m 1 1 2.414 .414 .586

Rewrite the matrix equations on normal coordinates


T

1 q 2 q

q1 q2

q1 q2

ky1( t )

where
T

M C K Y

m c k

6.827 0 3 1 4 0 0 4 1 3

0 1.171

1 2.414 1

2kyo sin t

.414 2kyo sin t

Resume here
m 6.827 0 1 q 1.171 2 q 0 c 3 1 1 q1 3 q2 k 4 0 q1 2kyo sin t (2kyo sin t ) 0 4 q2

--In this case, we use the damping assumption, , and simply write it in the equations of motion. in equation form
1 2 q 2 2 q
1 2

q1 q2

q1 2kyo sin t
2

q2

(2kyo sin t )

The solutions to these are already known for each type of force Use y(t)=1sin4t, =0 then
1 2(.586k / m)1 / 2 (.01)q1 .586 q 2 2(3.414k / m)1 / 2 (.01)q 2 q k 2k (1" ) sin 4 t q1 m 6.827# s 2 / in k 2k (1" ) sin 4 t 3.414 q 2 m 1.171# s 2 / in

the solutions are of the form


1 (2 r ) 2 qi( t ) Y[ ]1/ 2 sin( t 2 2 2 [(1 r ) (2 r ) ] 2 ri i tan 1 ( ) 1 ri 2 )

setting k=1, m=1, =.01

1 (2(.01)( q1( t ) .586 2 2 [(1 ( ) ) 4 .586 2(.01) 4 ) 0 tan 1 ( .586 2 1 ( ) 4 2"[ 2"[

.586 2 )) 4 ]1 / 2 sin( 4 t .586 2 (2(.01)( ) ] 4

1 (2(.01)( q 2( t ) 3.414 2 2 [(1 ( ) ) 4 3.414 2(.01) 4 ) 0 tan 1 ( 3.414 2 1 ( ) 4

3.414 2 )) 4 ]1 / 2 sin( 4 t 3.414 2 (2(.01)( ) ] 4

TRANSFORM BACK
x1( t ) x 2( t ) x1( t ) x 2( t )
(1)

q1( t )

( 2)

q 2( t ) 1 q 2( t ) .414

1 q1( t ) 2.414

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy