We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3
2, (80 points) Consider the following two-sector economies, A and B with linear production
tecimology. For comntry A, the consumption paths that show the relative demand for one
Of the sectors’ production in terms of the production of otlier for each of the countries are
given as
QWr=As & Wy= Wi,
where Qf, is the quantity of good 1 demanded by all eonsurners im country A. Other
quantity variables are definod sitnilarly,
Labor is the only factor of production. Total labor supply in each of the countries is 200
units. Production technologies as given by the following supply ‘production funetions,
QaaOlia & Baa Blra
ie Bho & Oy 2ap.
where Qi, fs the quantity of good 1 produced by E3,4 many workers from country A who
work in sector 1, Other quantity variables are defined similarly. Assuine that the labor is
perfectly mobile between the industries. Productivity of labor at industry 1 in country A
is given by the parameter @ > 0.
Answer the following questions.
(a) Consider the Sautarky” scenario; that is, suppose that there is no trade between coun-
tries and so both economies are closed. Find the equilibrinm allocation of labor and
quantity among, the sectors for both countries as functions of 8.
(b) Calculate GI
How does GDP change with 8? Provide some intuition
DP of country A using all three approaches and explain your calculations,
(0) For which values of @ docs country A have comparative advantage in good 2?
(d) Suppose that the countries open up to trade at the relative price ft = 1. Suppose that
# satisfy the condition you found in the previous part and that the relative price of
good 2 is less than 1
Assume that country A fully specializes in the production of good 2 after opening up
to trace; that is, it uses all of its resources to produce good 2. Find the quantities
traded, produced and consumed in country A along with the labor market allocation.3. (10 points) An investor considers investing in one of the two entrepreneurs, whose business
plans lead to the following expectod outcomes.
A domestic entrepreneur with the following outcomes and the corresponding probabil
ities.
% Gain or Loss | Probability
«A foreign entrepreneur with the following outcomes and the corresponding probabili-
ties.
% Gain or Loss | Probability
0% 05
25% 0.25
40% 0.25
‘The exchange rate Eyre between the local and forvign earrency might change by the time
‘the outcomes of the investment realizes. Local currency might appreciate against the foreign
currency by 10% with 04 probability, and depreciate 20% with the remaining probability
Assume that the exchange rate fluctuations are independent of the entrepreneurs’ invest-
Calculate and compare the real rates of returns for cach of the investment options assuring
that the expected inflation rate is 3%4. (15 points) Consider two economies 1 and 2, Assume that the financial capital is perfectly
mobile between the financial markets of both economies. Let ¥\ and ¥; be the ageregute
income in economies 1 and 2
The following information about the economies is given
Country L Country 2
Augregate Consumption 2000) 1000
Augiegate Tnvestinent T= 350 T= 100
‘Government Expenditures Gi — 300 G2 = 200
Net Exports XM = 50 | Xp — My = 100
Money Demand, M2/P Yi = 10000, | 2¥2 — 100002
Nominal Money Supply, 710000 5000
Price level, P 4 2
Suppose that expected exchange rate is given as Ey
Suppese that some news about country 2 arrive. According to the news, a significant
increase in the investment is expected in country 2 the next year (but not now)
Which variables would be immediately affected by the arrival of these news? Provide
fa graphical analysis to illustrate the macroeconomic impact of this announcement.
In your analysis, make a distinction between short run and medium-ran where some
prices are flexible.
5, (15 points) Consider two countries, Home and Foreign, with two industries, electronies and
textiles, and two factors of production, low-skilled labor and high-skilled labor. Suppose
that Home country is (relatively) abundant in high-skilled labor, electronies uses high-
skilled labor relatively
hold.
ure intensely, sind the assumptions of the Heckscher-Ohlin model
(a) Provide a graphical illustration of competitive equilibria before and after trade, and
the potential gains from international trade using production possibilities frontiers.
() Suppose that a major immigration flow into the Home country makes it relatively
abundant: in Jow-skilled labor compared to the Foreign country. Provide a graphical
illustration of the potential changes in the before and after trade equilibria.
Can you provide any recent or historical example of a country that experienced some
thing similar?