0% found this document useful (0 votes)
80 views2 pages

02 Eng-Tips Ringwall Q

Uploaded by

Edson Callata
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
80 views2 pages

02 Eng-Tips Ringwall Q

Uploaded by

Edson Callata
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Sheet 1 of 2

MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA - HIBBING, MINNESOTA CLIENT: Enbridge Cushing


DULUTH, MINNESOTA - BISMARCK, NORTH DAKOTA
ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN - GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN JEFFERSON DATE: 8/3/2023
CITY, MISSOURI - SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
CALGARY, ALBERTA PROJECT: 36601031 Cushing Tanks CP
COMPUTED CHECKED APPROVED Tank 1048 Ring Wall Evaluation
DHA
BY: BY: BY: Review for Damaged Hoop Rebar
Background:
The Ring Wall of Tank 1048 will be core drilled in several locations to sample soil for corrosion inhibitors
This analysis assumes at one location on the tank one inner wall horizontal hoop rebar is damaged by the core drill
It is assumed 100% of material is removed of one inner #8 hoop bar.

Concrete Properties
Number of damaged of Rebar: 1 F'c 3.0 ksi
Area of #8 Bar A: 0.785 in2 Fy 60.0 ksi
Nominal Diamter of a #8 Bar db = √(4A/π): 1.000 in 1.000
Depth removed y: 1.000 in 1.00
Chord width removed x: NA in
Central angle C: NA rad
Removed ΔA =(R2/2)[ C - sin C)]: 0.785 in2 NA
Net Area of Damaged Rebar Ab = A - ΔA : 0.000 in2 MORE THAN 50% OF BAR IS REMOVED - ASSUME 100% REMOVED

Tank Geometry: Tank Loads:


Tank Diameter D: 200 FT Product SG: 0.940 From Drawing 03A
Design Liquid Level H: 51.25 FT Product Unit Wt: 58.66 PCF
Ring Wall height of Concrete: 3.0FT Shell DL : 800 kip From Calculation
Exterior Grade Elev: 2.0FT Shell DL on Tank wall: 1273 PLF
Interior Backfill Elev: 3.0 FT Roof DL on Tank Wall: 0 PLF Not Applicable
Bottom of Footing Elev: 0.0FT Roof SL on Tank Wall: 0 PLF Not Applicable
Ring Wall Width B: 1.500 FT Floating Roof SL = 0.84 ground SL: 8.4 PSF API 650; 10 PSF Ground
Leave blank if no footing Footing Width W: FT Floating Roof Weight: 517.794 kip From Drawing 03A
Leave blank if no footing Footing Depth Df: FT Floating Roof DL: 16.5 PSF
Tank Wall to ringwall Centerline L: 9.0 inch Tank Bottom Plate DL: 10.2 PSF From Calculation
(From interior face of wall)
Ringwall Moment of Inertia (I) 2,356,228 FT^4 Vertical Acceleration: Av 0.285 g From Calculation
Seismic Base Shear Vs: 5171.3 KIP From Calculation
Seismic Overturning moment Mrw: 102776 KIP-FT From Calculation
Base Shear per foot Vs/Circumference: 8230 PLF
Seismic(from OTM): E 6.543 KLF Utilizes E=MR/I for an
eccentricly loaded FDN
Product Wb: 3006 PSF

PT 1273 PLF SL on Roof Wb: 8 PSF


Tank Floating Roof DL Wb: 16 PSF
Center Tank Bottom Plate DL Wb: 10 PSF
Hydrostatic Test + DL: 3225 PSF Hydrotest not used in
Sum Wb with Product + DL: 3033 PSF this sheet
Sum Wb with Product + DL + 0.5 SL: 3037 PSF
R Max Operating Wb: 3037 PSF
99.250 FT
B= 1.500 Backfill Properties:
FT Higher bound Compacted Unit Wt λ: 120 PCF
L 0.750 FT Lateral Pressure Coefficient K: 0.35
Vs= 8230 These backfill properties are for review of Ring Wall with
PLF Wb damaged rebar. API 650 allows K = 0.3 for granular backfill.
Drawings show k=0.4, and granular structural fill.
1.00 FT Sand Cushion This analysis uses 0.35, falling between the two values.
Grade
Compacted Granular Backfill Hydrotest Operating
λ= 120 PCF Loads Loads
K= 0.35
KWb KWb
FT 3.000 FT 1129 PSF 1063
H 2.00 FT PSF
3.00
KλH KλH
126 PSF 126 PSF
0.00
FT KλH KλH
0.00 NA PSF NA PSF
FT

P:\Duluth\36 OK\60\36601031 Cushing Tanks CP\WorkFiles\Structural Tank Foundation Coring\2023 Coring\Tank 1048\Cushing Tank 1048 full rebar_V3.xlsx
Sheet 2 of 2

MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA - HIBBING, MINNESOTA CLIENT: Enbridge Cushing


DULUTH, MINNESOTA - BISMARCK, NORTH DAKOTA
ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN - GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN JEFFERSON DATE: 8/3/2023
CITY, MISSOURI - SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
CALGARY, ALBERTA PROJECT: 36601031 Cushing Tanks CP
COMPUTED CHECKED APPROVED Tank 1048 Ring Wall Evaluation
DHA
BY: BY: BY: Review for Damaged Hoop Rebar
ACI 318 Evaluation
Hoop Stress Rebar: Quantity Size ∑Ab
Original Hoop As provided: 15 #8 11.78 in2
Undamaged As: 14 #8 11.00 in2
Sum Net Damaged As: 1 0.00 in2
Total Available Hoop Rebar As: 11.00 in2 This is 93.3% of the original steel provided.

Hoop Stress: Operating R 1.6KWb Hwall


Factored Hoop Tension Tu = R x 1.6 KWb x Hwall/1000: 99.250 x 1701 x 3.000 = 506 Kips
Factored Hoop Tension Tu = R x 1.6 K λ H x Hwall/(2x1000): 99.250 x 201.6 x 1.500 = 30 Kips
Total Hoop Tenion Tu: 536 Kips

ø 0.9
Hoop Tension Rebar Required ∑As = Tu/(ø Fy): ∑As 9.93 in2 The available As is OK
Utilization: 90.3% for Operating Conditions

ACI 318 Evaluation


Twisting Moment: Operating
X Load LF MT
FT Kips FT-K X = load eccentricity L/2
PT 0.000 1.273 1.2 0.00 Load = Wb x L
Wb 0.375 2.28 1.2 1.02 LF from PIP STE03020 Example 1
E 0.000 6.543 1.4 0.00 to convert ASD loads to Strength level
Seismic PT 0.000 0.145 1.4 0.00
Seismic Wb 0.375 0.260 1.4 0.14
Used Full Wb instead of 2/3 Wb allowed
∑ MTU 1.16 FT-K

D/2 L B/2 Mu
Twist Moment Mu = MTU (D/2 - L + B/2): 100.000 0.750 0.750 116.1 FT-K from PIP STE03020
NOTE: Twist moment Mu causes tension at bottom of ring wall and compression at the top where the damaged rebar is located.

Depth to rebar at bottom d: 31.88 in 3" Clear and #5 tie plus 1/2 Hoop rebar allowed for.
Rn = Mu/(ø Bd2): Mu ø B d2 Rn
in-K in in2 ksi
1393.6 0.9 18 1016.0 0.085

Ƿ = .85F'c/FY (1- (1-2Rn/.85F'c)0.5) 0.85F'c/Fy: 0.0425


2Rn: 0.169335
0.85F'c: 2.55
Ƿ: 0.001435
As = ǷBd: 0.82 in2 If As < As min then use the minimum of 4/3 As or 0.0025bh
As min = 0.0025 Bh: 1.62 in2 API 650 Section B4.2.3 d
or As max = 4/3 As: 1.10 in2

Operating
Hoop Tension As + Twisting Moment As: Utilization
Total Hoop Rebar plus Twist Rebar As = 9.93 + 1.10 = 11.03 in2 100.3%

SUMARY OF EVALUATION:

1) Tank TK-1041 Ringwall foundation reinforcing is adequate to support the tank under full Operating conditions using K = 0.35 with one cut horizontal rebar

2) API 650 allows higher stress (lower safety factor) in the tank shell for a Hydrotest. Similarly the Ring wall hoop tension could be
adjusted with a smaller load factor under ACI 318 to provided a similar level of safety.

References:
API 650: Welded Tanks for Oil Storage: 13th Edition, Errata 1, March 2020
PIP STE03020 : Guidelines for Tank Foundations, May 2005
ACI 318-19 Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete

P:\Duluth\36 OK\60\36601031 Cushing Tanks CP\WorkFiles\Structural Tank Foundation Coring\2023 Coring\Tank 1048\Cushing Tank 1048 full rebar_V3.xlsx

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy