Sanchezetal 2023 Shoppingpreferences
Sanchezetal 2023 Shoppingpreferences
net/publication/371655539
CITATIONS READS
0 23,091
7 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Jaycar Espinosa on 17 June 2023.
Research Article
Article ID Number The study investigates the shopping preferences of senior high school
202302034 students at Siena College of Quezon City, focusing mainly on traditional
shopping (TS) and online shopping (OS) as purchasing methods.
Article History Specifically, it aims to seek the consumer respondents’ assessments of their
Received 18 Feb 2023 behavior in terms of both shopping lifestyles, preferences in terms of a broad
Reviewed 21 Apr 2023 range of choices in products, safety, convenience, prices, and promotions,
Revised 30 Apr 2023 the significant association between shopping preferences and their age and
Accepted 01 May 2023 gender, and the disadvantages and advantages of both shopping methods.
Published 13 Jun 2023 In meeting these objectives, the research employed quantitative and
qualitative data gathering and analysis through online surveys and virtual
Gunning Fog Index: 12.43 interviews. The results indicated that most respondents prefer online
shopping in terms of its broad range of choices of products available, safety,
Similarity Index: < 20% convenience, prices, and promotions rather than traditional shopping.
Corresponding Author Moreover, the study shows no significant association between the age and
gender of the respondents and their shopping preferences. Future
Jaycar P. Espinosa
researchers who undertake a similar study may acquire more knowledge
jpespinosa@ust.edu.ph
about contrasting traditional and offline purchasing through the data and
Quick Response Code analysis this research will provide. As a result, this study might support other
investigations while gathering relevant literature.
Keywords
consumer preferences, online shopping, traditional shopping
Published by
Academic Course Tutorial Online Education Inc., Philippines
Philippine SEC Registration No. 2022090068590-16 Website: https://actonlineedu.org/
86
shoppers compare their expectations for a particular Concerning the fourth question, below are the null
product or brand to the actual product they receive. It hypotheses tested at the significance level of 0.05:
ensures that stores or sellers must always consider the
image or reputation they may have with their customers. a. H01: There is no significant association between the
If the shoppers’ expectations are not met, this could set a shopping preferences of the consumers and their
bad example for future shoppers, especially when they age.
get reviewed. b. H02: There is no significant association between the
shopping preferences of the consumers and their
Conceptual Framework gender.
The Preferences of Senior High School Students of Siena College of Quezon City in Traditional and Online Shopping
© Author/s 2023
88
The first section collects the respondent’s socio- respondent’s time. There are no foreseeable
demographic information, including age, gender, grade extreme risks to participating in this research.
level, and academic track. The second and third sections
contain five items measuring the respondent’s TS and b. Benefits for the Participants. There was no direct
OS behaviors, respectively. Items 1, 3, and 4 of these benefit to the respondents' participation in the study.
sections are measured on a five-point Likert scale. The However, it will benefit various businesses
last section comprises four recognition-type questions regarding their service towards the reasoning
measuring the respondent’s shopping preferences in behind a customer's decision, which can improve
terms of a broad range of product choices, safety, business performance and gain customer feedback
convenience, and prices and promotions. in supporting their products and services.
For the same reason, a series of structured interviews c. Compensation. The data gathering for this study
were conducted virtually through Zoom to gather did not involve any financial matters as far as the
qualitative data. During this qualitative data gathering, an respondents were concerned.
interview guide was prepared composed of ten
researcher-made questions about the preferences of the d. Provision for Injury or Related Illness. The
interviewees in terms of TS and OS as well as their respondents’ participation in the study was limited
recommended shopping method based on their own to the completion of the survey questionnaire or
experience. interview. Hence, there was no possibility of harm
or injury as the information collection was
To check the validity of the study’s quantitative and accomplished in school or in the comfort of their
qualitative research instruments, two experts were asked homes.
to evaluate the content of the tools. In so doing, the
questions were ensured to be appropriate measurements e. Voluntariness of Participation. Participation in the
of the study’s research questions. study was completely voluntary. The respondents
were given the right to withdraw at any point in any
Data Analysis case of discomfort.
The survey data were analyzed using percentages, f. Conflict of Interest. The researchers do not have
weighted means, and the Pearson chi-square test. any close relatives or friends among the
Percentage analysis was employed to determine the respondents. Hence, no potential sources of
demographic profile of the respondents, the reasons for conflict of interest may bias the results of the study.
using either of the two shopping modes, the amount
spent on OS and TS, and the respondents' preferences g. Confidentiality. The researchers guarantee that the
in terms of a broad range of products, safety, respondent’s personal information will not be
convenience, and prices and promotions. The Likert disclosed without permission. The respondents
scale responses were treated using the calculation of may or may not place their names on the
weighted means, while the chi-square analysis was questionnaires and interview notes, as they will be
utilized to test the study's null hypotheses. de-identified and anonymized by assigning code
numbers. The study abides by the provisions of the
On the other hand, the mode of analysis for the Data Privacy Act of the Philippines.
qualitative data used a thematic approach to the five
interview transcripts. Before analysis, the interview data h. Disclosure of Publication Rights. The results may
underwent a system of coding and organization. The be presented at a conference or published in an
emerging patterns and themes from the interview academic journal. However, the respondents'
responses were investigated in this thematic analysis. identities will remain private and confidential.
Ethical Considerations
representation in the study (n = 81). Regarding grade Table 2 also enumerates and describes the common
level, there are relatively more Grade 12 respondents (n problems encountered by select SHS student
= 89) than Grade 11 respondents (n = 55). Furthermore, respondents in TS. Most of them reported that travel time
most respondents were taking the STEM academic track (n = 78) and the unavailability of desired products (n = 83)
(n = 58), with a slight difference from the other two tracks: were the main issues they observed while in TS mode.
ABM (n = 44) and HUMSS (n = 42). Similarly, Jayalaxmi et al. (2014) observed that one of the
apparent disadvantages of physical shops is their limited
Table 1 product selection. The stores can only hold a limited
SHS Student Respondents’ Demographic Profile
number of items, and numerous regulations frequently
Demographic Frequency Percentage impact product availability. Moreover, the travel distance
Indicators (N = 144) (%) from home or work to the store requires time (Bagla,
Age 2018). Shopping in traditional stores has physical
15 years old 3 2.10 restrictions wherein shoppers must go through multiple
16 years old 34 23.60
17 years old 66 45.80 stores to find a product, which takes time and effort.
18 years old 40 27.80 Simply put, TS is a strenuous task because shoppers
20 years old 1 0.70 need to leave the comfort of their homes (Kaur & Kaur,
Gender 2018).
Female 81 56.30
Male 58 40.30
Prefer not to say 5 3.50 Table 2
SHS Student Respondents’ Traditional Shopping Behavior and
Grade Level
Experiences
Grade 11 55 38.20
Grade 12 89 61.80
Frequency Percentage Weighted Verbal
Academic Track Indicators
(N = 144) (%) Mean Interpretation
ABM 44 30.60
HUMSS 42 29.20 Frequency and Satisfaction Levels
STEM 58 40.30 1. Frequency
3.74 Often
Note. ABM stands for Accountancy, Business and Management; HUMSS
of use of TS
stands for Humanities and Social Sciences; and STEM means Science, 2. Frequency of
Technology, Engineering and Mathematics encountering
2.43 Rarely
a problem in
TS
Consumer Behavior in Traditional 3. Level of
Shopping (TS) satisfaction
with the 3.97 Satisfied
overall TS
Table 2 summarizes the select SHS student respondents’ experience
overall TS behaviors and experiences. In terms of their Reasons for Choosing TS Mode (Multiple Response)
TS frequency and satisfaction levels, these respondents 1. Can examine
often go to TS, rarely encounter problems in TS, and are products 127 88.19
physically
satisfied with their overall TS experience. The same table 2. No delivery
also shows that the majority of the respondents go to TS time
90 62.50
mode due to the following reasons: the possibility of 3. Assistance &
products on sale being examined (n = 127); the absence recommen-
77 53.47
dations from
of delivery time (n = 90); and the assistance and sale staff
recommendations they receive from sale staff (n = 77). 4. Quick return 48 33.33
Problems Encountered in TS (Multiple Response)
Similar to the findings of Das and Sarkar (2017), one of 1. Travel time 78 54.17
2. Limited time
the advantages of TS is that buyers can touch and feel of operating 48 33.33
the products, get a firsthand display, and, in the case of hours
garments, try them on before purchasing items. It might 3. Unavailability
be enjoyable for consumers to examine products and feel of desired 83 57.64
product/s
their colors, textures, and other characteristics while 4. Long queues
shopping. Kaur and Kaur (2018) also claim that one of before 70 5.56
the advantages of TS that consumers prefer is that they payment
do not have to wait for the services or products they Note. Never (or Very unsatisfied) 1.00-1.49; Rarely (or Unsatisfied) 1.50–
2.49; Sometimes (or Neutral satisfaction) 2.50–3.49; Often (or Satisfied)
purchase. Because they purchase it straight from the 3.50–4.49; and Always (or Very satisfied) 4.50–5.00.
seller, their services or products are immediately
available. Moreover, personnel behavior influences Consumer Behavior in Online Shopping
customers' experiences in various ways, such as their (OS)
readiness to assist and professional knowledge and skills,
as well as their attitude and ways of handling in-store Table 3 shows the behaviors and experiences of select
consumers (Backstrom & Johansson, 2017). students from SHS while in OS mode. It shows that
respondents who have already experienced OS often
choose this shopping mode, sometimes encounter issues
The Preferences of Senior High School Students of Siena College of Quezon City in Traditional and Online Shopping
© Author/s 2023
90
Table 4
SHS Student Respondents’ Preferences Between TS and OS
Traditional Online
Age Gender
Shopping Shopping
Preference Indicators
p- p-
n % n % Verbal Interpretation Verbal Interpretation
value value
Broad range of product options 57 39.6 87 60.4 0.354 No significant association 0.560 No significant association
Safety 70 48.6 74 51.4 0.826 No significant association 0.354 No significant association
Convenience 45 31.3 99 68.8 0.339 No significant association 0.296 No significant association
Prices and promos 40 27.8 104 72.2 0.259 No significant association 0.299 No significant association
Note. Tested at an alpha level of 0.05.
The Preferences of Senior High School Students of Siena College of Quezon City in Traditional and Online Shopping
© Author/s 2023
92
For future similar studies, it is recommended to conduct with it, which are mostly related to the travel time from
quantitative data gathering with a larger sample size and their location to the stores. Although consumer
a more diverse age group to better compare preferences respondents encounter problems in OS more frequently
towards online and traditional shopping. It is also than TS, OS is preferred by the majority over TS due to
recommended to conduct the study over a broader its variety of products, convenience, safety, discounts,
geographical area. More in-depth research and additional and promotions. These findings imply that despite the
literature are also advisable, as this paper may only differences between the two shopping modes, both TS
partially support future studies as it only represents a and OS have a fair share of advantages, which
specific population and context. consumers may want to maximize, and disadvantages,
which consumers might want to avoid. Moreover, the
study shows no significant associations between
consumers' age and gender and their purchasing
preferences, implicating the need for online sellers to
In a nutshell, TS mode is commonly used by consumer develop a single marketing strategy for both brick-and-
respondents because it allows them to inspect the mortar and virtual markets without worrying about age
product physically, and they rarely experience problems and gender-based strategies.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall.
Backstrom, K., & Johansson, U. (2017). An exploration of consumers’ experiences in physical stores: comparing consumers’ and retailers’ perspectives
in past and present time. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumers’ Research, 27(3).
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2017.131486
Bagla, D. (2018). Online vs. offline shopping. National Journal of Research and Innovative Practices, 2(1).
Choe, Y., Moon, J., & Song, H. (2021). Determinants of consumers’ online/offline shopping behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic. International
Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041593
Dai, H., Harried, P., & Salam, A. F. (2011). Antecedents of online service quality, commitment and international journal of academic research in
business and social sciences. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 52(2), 1–11.
Das, S., & Sarkar, R. (2017). Online shopping vs. offline shopping: A comparative study. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and
Technology, 3(1), 424-431.
Dekimpe, M.G., Geyskens, I., & Gielens, K. (2019). Using technology to bring online convenience to offline shopping. Marketing Letters, 31(1), 25–29.
Devender, K., & Kirti, K. (2019). A comparative study of online and offline shopping in Haryana. An International Journal of Marketing and Business
Communication, 8(4), 1-6.
Ferreira, J.P. S. (2015). Online shopping behavior in offline retail stores: Strategic value for companies? [Unpublished master dissertation].
Universidade Católica Portuguesa. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/18791
Gupta, P. (2015). Comparative study of online and offline shopping: A case study of Rourkela in Odisha [Master thesis, National Institute of
Technology]. CORE. https://core.ac.uk/outputs/80147550
Jayalaxmi, S., & Reddy, K. (2014). A comparative study of traditional shopping vs. online shopping. Annquest, 3(1), 37-51.
Joshi, M. S., & Karmakar, A. (2021). Consumer behavior towards online shopping: Study during COVID-19 pandemic. Kalyan Bharati, 36(7), 177-182.
Kacen J., Hess J., & Chiang, W. (2013). Bricks or clicks? Consumer attitudes toward traditional stores and online stores. Global Economics and
Management Review, 18(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2340-1540(13)70003-3
Kaur, S., & Kaur, V. (2018). Comparative study on online vs. traditional shopping. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 6(1), 1460-
1470. https://ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT1705208.pdf
Matz, M. (2021). Online vs. offline shopping, impact of covid-19 on the digitalization process in Austria [Unpublished bachelor thesis]. Modul University.
Nepomuceno, M. V., Laroche, M., & Richard, M. O. (2014). How to reduce perceived risk when buying online: The interactions between intangibility,
product knowledge, brand familiarity, privacy and security concerns. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(4), 619–629.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.11.006
Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/002224378001700405
Prebreza, A. & Shala, B. (2021). The trust in online shopping during COVID-19: Case study. Open Access Library Journal, 8(4), 1-15.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107288
Salkind, N. (2014). Statistics for people who (think that) hate statistics. SAGE.
Schulze, J. (2020). Online and offline shopping: Decision making factors that influence consumer purchases [Unpublished master dissertation].
Bournemouth University.
Silpa, K. S., Rajasree, P. U., & Balasubramanian, D. P. (2016). A study on people's perceptions towards online shopping. Bonfring International
Journals of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, 6(3), 93-95.
Suggested Citation
American Sanchez, R. K. B., Fabella, M. F. E. V., Uy, M. E. C., Revilla, J. M. R., Hagacer, M. J. G., &
Psychological Espinosa, J. P. (2023). The preferences of senior high school students of Siena College of Quezon
Association (APA) City in traditional and online shopping: A mixed method study. International Journal of
Academic and Practical Research, 2(1), 85–93.
Author Biographies
Rehana Kacela B. Sanchez is an Accountancy, Business John Martin R. Revilla is an Accountancy, Business and
and Management (ABM) student at the University of Santo Management (ABM) senior high school student at the
Tomas and a member of ABM Society 2022-2023 under the University of Santo Tomas and a member of AYAN
Entrepreneurship Committee. She previously studied at Philippines and the Rotaract Club of Makati. He had
Siena College of Quezon City. She conducted a research previously studied at Wesleyan Academy Inc., Cainta,
study on traditional and online shopping as part of her Rizal. As part of his requirements as an ABM student, Mr.
academic requirements, which are related to the Revilla studied the traditional and online shopping
specialization of her strand. Email: preferences of senior high school students from Siena
rehanakacela.sanchez.shs@ust.edu.ph College of Quezon City. Email:
johnmartin.revilla.shs@ust.edu.ph
Ma. Francesca Erin V. Fabella is currently a senior high
school student at the University of Santo Tomas, taking Matthew James G. Hagacer is a senior high school
the Accountancy Business Management (ABM) strand. She student at the University of Santo Tomas studying
spent her previous years at the Manresa School of Accountancy, Business and Management (ABM). He had
Parañaque and is currently a member of the ABM previously attended the Cavite School of Saint Mark. He
Organization. As a required course for the strand, she participated in their research course with his group as a
partakes in a research course in which their group mandatory course for the strand, which completed
performs qualitative and quantitative research on the qualitative and quantitative research on the senior high
senior high school students of Siena College of Quezon school students of Siena College in Quezon City that
City that focuses on their preferences pertaining to focuses on their preferences relative to shopping
shopping lifestyles. Email: lifestyles. Email:
mafrancesca.fabella.shs.@ust.edu.ph matthewjames.hagacer.shs@ust.edu.ph
Maxine Erich C. Uy is enrolled in the Accountancy Jaycar P. Espinosa, MA, is an Economics researcher and
Business Management (ABM) track as a senior high school Senior High School (SHS) teacher currently affiliated with
student at the University of Santo Tomas. In the past, she the University of Santo Tomas (UST). He obtained his
attended Lorenzo Ruiz Academy. She enjoys editing, Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics (Magna Cum Laude)
painting, and drawing. In college, she plans to major in from the UST Faculty of Arts and Letters and his Master
fine arts. However, as an ABM student, she conducted of Arts degree in Economics (Cum Laude) from the UST
research about the traditional and online shopping Graduate School. His research interests are health
preferences of Senior High School students at Siena economics, public sector economics, and quantitative
College of Quezon City in relation to her strand. Email: and mixed methods. Currently, he has published and co-
maxineerich.uy.shs@ust.edu.ph published one (1) journal article, one (1) handbook, and
11 book chapters. Email: jpespinosa@ust.edu.ph
The Preferences of Senior High School Students of Siena College of Quezon City in Traditional and Online Shopping
© Author/s 2023
94