Public Interest Litigation - Kavi Priya - K.P.R
Public Interest Litigation - Kavi Priya - K.P.R
COURSE: BBA.LLB[HONS]
INTRODUCTION
The term "public interest litigation" originated in American jurisprudence and refers to a legal strategy that was
intended to give historically underrepresented groups such as the impoverished, racial minorities, disorganized
customers, and individuals with strong environmental concerns legal representation. There is no definition of
PIL in any legislation or statute. Judges have construed it to take the general public's intent into account. It is the
authority that courts grant to the general population through judicial activism. Go over the Judicial Activism
page in detail by clicking the link. To the satisfaction of the court, the petitioner must, however, demonstrate
that the case is being brought for the benefit of the public and is not merely a pointless legal dispute
brought by a busybody. Neglected children, bonded labor issues, atrocities against women, nonpayment of
minimum wages to workers, exploitation of temporary workers, adulteration of food, pollution of the
environment and disruption of the ecological balance, preservation of heritage and culture, etc. are some of the
cases that fall under the purview of public interest litigation. PILs, short for public interest litigations, are
essential in furthering the concept of judicial activism as these enable high courts or the Indian Supreme Court
to use their writ jurisdiction in defense of and for all the citizens of India.
Any citizen or organization in India has the right to approach the court with a public interest cause and their
petition may be filed:
Letter addressed to the court can also be treated as writ petition by the court and it may proceed. It must be
ensured by the court that the following conditions are met regarding writ petition. Any letter for enforcement of
legal or constitutional rights on behalf of the disadvantaged or destitute individuals who cannot go to court or a
proactive, social interest person/representative or organization to whom that letter is written. Even in such cases,
the court may act upon the reports, if satisfied with the case and media coverage
To draft a PIL there are basic steps that ought to be followed as outlined below:
Gathering of information-The first step when drafting a PIL is to collect all relevant information related to the
issue. Combining of documents-All documents regarding the case including photographs if any must be
combined .Court for filing-The Petitioner should decide where they would like to file his/her/its PIL whether it
is before the Honorable Supreme Court or the State High Court. Manner of PIL-A PIL can be for example either
a petition or even a letter or postcard. A letter/postcard addressed to Chief Justice of India should be used in
case the PIL is meant for Honorable Supreme Court of India. However if it needs to be filed before other High
Courts, then such letter/postcards must be sent out through their respective Chief Justices. Guidelines on Public
Litigation-When one is drafting a PIL, public litigation guidelines applicable for the court before which one
intends submitting his/her application must always be checked first before proceeding with any writing process
on the matter at hand. Such guidelines can always be found at various courts’ official Websites .Details needing
clarity-The following particulars must be unambiguously given;
Petitioner’s name ,postal address, email address phone number, profession or occupation annually.
Public interest litigation is criticized Even while the idea of public interest litigation is very important, over
time, people began to take advantage of it. Numerous pointless petitions have been and continue to be filed
under the guise of public interest litigation, significantly delaying and obstructing the legal process. PILs are
used for publicity purposes, wasting the court's valuable time. The court's time and resources are wasted even in
the event that such pointless petitions are dismissed. PIL is occasionally used by advocates to gain attention,
and political parties even use it to further their own goals. All of this contributes to the misuse of the idea of
public interest litigation, which eventually makes our legal system more burdened.
Thereupon, PIL entered into the system in India and has remained so ever since. It has been instrumental in
numerous societal shifts for the better and showed its maximum efficacy in the prosecution of the causes
regarding environmentalism, consumer protection and human rights.
Hussainara Khatoon vs. State of Bihar case: This case was the first reported instance of PIL in India, which
brought attention to the issue of inhuman conditions of prisoners and under trial prisoners.
Vishaka vs. State of Rajasthan: This case is related to the issue of sexual harassment in the workplace. As a
result, the Vishaka Guidelines came into effect, published in 1997, which provided employers with the
definition of sexual harassment, a list of preventative strategies, and information on filing complaints of
workplace sexual harassment.
M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India: This case is related to pollution in the Ganges basin. The judgment criticised
the local government for giving permission for untreated sewage from Kanpur’s tanneries to enter the Ganges.
Directions were given to prevent the consequences of water and air pollution on millions of people in the Ganga
basin and emphazised the need for sustainable development.
Parmanand Katara vs. Union of India: This case was filed to facilitate hospitals to handle emergency accident
cases without concern for pending police investigations. The judgment made it obligatory for a hospital or
doctor, public and private, to provide immediate medical aid to a road accident victim.
Javed vs. State of Haryana: In this case, the constitutionality of a population control provision governing the
panchayat election was challenged. The Haryana Provision disqualified persons having more than two children
from holding certain offices in panchayats. The court mainly emphasised the problem of population explosion
as a global and national issue at the expense of protecting human rights. The court held that the Haryana
Provision was well-defined and based on a clear objective to popularise family planning.
CONCLUSION:
A PIL is a very useful instrument of the court especially in the interest of the people who cannot file a case.
They constitute one of the most popular forms of litigations practice more so in the environmental ones. The
courts have attempted to streamline the procedural rules on IPILs in order to encourage the pursuance of these
actions in the greater public good especially on behalf of the impoverished and disabled people. Yes the people
tend to abuse this remedy and try to use this to fulfill their own selfish motives. So, courts will be further more
cautious while ordering PILs. This PIL seeks to redress severe injustice as well as violation of some
fundamental rights faced Specific Group or Community particularly in relation to specific issue. The petitioners
intend to Point out the systemic failures and gaps in the issue. Come up with policies or laws to resolve the
problem. Ensure that the law and policies are followed. Safeguard the welfare of the exposed patients.
Encourage responsible and ethical practices, governance or management. Void from aiding Profiling
Ban .Through this PIL, we aim to defend .the .rightness of the society based on equality and the dignity of every
person and integrity. PILs are a vital tool to protect the human rights of those who are otherwise unable to do so
due to poverty or for other’s reasons. It also supports the judicial control of state institutions like asylums,
prisons, or protective homes. With respect to justice, the focus of the phrase is the easing of the access of the
ordinary citizens to the courts. It is a powerful tool for social change, for the promotion of justice and the rule of
law and its protection.