Scribd
Upload
16 views3 pages

Leadership Styles Forbes Article

Uploaded by

Damilola Omololu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
16 views3 pages

Leadership Styles Forbes Article

Uploaded by

Damilola Omololu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Democratic, Authoritarian,

Laissez-Faire: What Type Of


Leader Are You?
In the 1930s, Kurt Lewin, the father of Social Psychology, produced groundbreaking work
identifying three types of leaders: laissez-faire, authoritarian, and democratic. Since then,
Lewin’s framework has influenced many subsequent perspectives on leadership. Learn what
type of leader you are and understand the strengths and weakness of each style.

Laissez-faire leadership

Laissez-faire leadership allows group members total freedom. Laissez-faire leaders do not
participate in the decision-making process, and rarely offer opinions. This style can work
well if the group is highly motivated and competent. However, laissez-faire leadership has
many drawbacks. Without the leader’s input, the group can sink into conflict as members
jockey over roles and responsibilities. In addition, deliberations may continue for far too
long. Finally, by not weighing in on the process, the leader forfeits control of the final
product. In Lewin’s study, the children under laissez-faire leadership were the least
productive and the most argumentative.

James Buchanan’s presidency offers a historical example of the weaknesses of laissez-faire


leadership. As slavery threatened to tear America apart, the nation needed leadership from
the White House. James Buchanan failed to offer it. As the South prepared to secede,
Buchanan told Congress that while he believed secession was illegal, the Federal
Government had no power to stop it. His position managed to alienate Northerners and
Southerners alike. Chaos reigned in his cabinet. Some secretaries resigned because
Buchanan failed to prevent secession, others resigned because failed to adequately support
the South. His Secretary of War, a Southerner, took matters into his own hands, deliberately
sending U.S. military supplies to locations where the South could easily capture them. This
action emboldened the Confederacy and weakened the Union Army when war broke out.
Many historians rate Buchanan as one of America’s worst presidents for his unwillingness to
confront the secession crisis.

Authoritarian leadership

Authoritarian leadership means that the leader has full power. Authoritarian leaders tell
groups what to do and expect group members to execute. Under time pressure, this style
may work well, allowing the leader to make a quick decision and providing the group with
direct instructions. An authoritarian leader who presents a clear vision can motivate a
divided group. However, authoritarian leaders are more likely to disregard the good ideas of
others. The style can also inspire resentment and stress. In Lewin’s study, the children under
authoritarian leadership were productive but not very creative.
President Lyndon Johnson provides an example of effective authoritarian leadership. In
Congress, Johnson was known for his aggressive style and his remarkable ability to get
legislation passed. When one senator quipped, “Rome wasn’t built in a day, another
responded, “Lyndon Johnson wasn’t the foreman on that job.” As President, Johnson sought
aimed to remake American society. His sweeping vision included civil rights, voting rights,
and Medicare. To achieve his goals, Johnson would cajole, threaten, charm, and browbeat
opponents into submission. In hindsight, it almost appears that Johnson’s sheer force of will
drove his landmark bills through Congress.

While authoritarian leaders may be exceptionally productive, some may also cause major
harm. The Kim family of North Korea is an extreme case of authoritarian leadership. In
North Korea, senior advisers are terrified of Kim-Jong Un with good reason. Instead of
honest advice, these men offer useless flattery instead. Unchecked, an authoritarian leader
can prove disastrous.

Democratic leadership

Democratic leadership balances decision-making responsibility between the group and the
leader. Democratic leaders actively participate in discussions, but also make sure to listen to
the views of others. This style often leads to positive, inclusive, and collaborative work
environments. Furthermore, a good democratic leader can bring out the group’s creativity.
Under this style, the leader still retains final responsibility for the group’s decision. In
Lewin’s study, the children under democratic leadership made the highest quality
contributions.

General Dwight Eisenhower and Nelson Mandela are examples of successful democratic
leaders. During WWII, Ike was appointed Supreme Allied Commander. While that title might
seem to imply unlimited authority, he worked extremely hard to hold together a diverse
coalition. Powerful Allied politicians often had conflicting goals and strong ideas about
military plans. Ike made these men feel heard even when their views were unrealistic. Ike
also preferred discussing issues with his staff rather than simply barking orders. Never afraid
to take blame, he once said, “leadership consists of nothing but taking responsibility for
everything that goes wrong and giving your subordinates credit for everything that goes
well.”

Mandela displayed a democratic leadership style during his long fight for equality. As a
leader of the African National Congress (ANC) he believed that people of all colors and
political affiliations could contribute to the movement. After nearly three decades in prison,
Mandela was released, and the ANC won South Africa’s first free election. When he became
president, Mandela could have sought revenge on his former oppressors. Instead, in an
exceptional act of forgiveness and reconciliation, he included them in his government. His
decision greatly accelerated the national healing process in South Africa.

Depending on the situation, each style can have pros and cons. What is your leadership
style? What about your boss? Your colleagues? Understanding each will make you a more
effective manager and teammate.
I believe that Damilola Omololu is an autocratic leader with a little mix of democratic as he
sees his vision and looks to quickly and effectively get it done but at times, he takes
suggestions to see whether they can improve or change some or most of the way the
project is being executed. However, these suggestions are not as often or common as when
a normal democratic leader would take suggestions. Additionally, dami has a tendency to
ignore suggestions and suggestions are sometimes repeated until they are taken into
account by dami.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy