0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views2 pages

Presentation 4

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views2 pages

Presentation 4

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Pros

•1. Community Involvement: Regular people help decide cases, making the
process more open.
•2. Different Viewpoints: Jurors come from different backgrounds, which can
lead to fairer choices.
•3. Limits Government Power: Juries can keep judges and the government in
check.
•4. Moral Judgment: Juries can think about feelings and ethics, not just laws.
•5. Trust in Decisions: People may trust a jury's decision more than just one
judge’s.
Cons
• 1. Bias: Jurors might have personal biases that affect their decisions.
• 2. Inconsistent Outcomes: Different juries can make different decisions in
similar cases.
• 3. Cost and Time: Jury trials can take a long time and be expensive.
• 4. Complex Cases: Some cases might be too complicated for jurors to
understand.
• 5. Emotional Pressure: Jurors can be influenced by emotions or other jurors.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy