0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views3 pages

Lecture 2

Uploaded by

pitonib499
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views3 pages

Lecture 2

Uploaded by

pitonib499
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Lecture 2

1 Sequences and their limit


Definition 1.0.1. A sequence of real numbers is a function from N to R.

Notation. It is customary to denote a sequence as {an }∞


n=1 .

(−1) n+1 √ ∞
Examples 1.0.2. (i) {c}∞
n=1 , c ∈ R, (ii) { n }∞ n−1 ∞
n=1 , (iii) { n }n=1 and (iv) { n}n=1 .

Definition 1.0.3. A sequence {an }∞ n=1 converges to limit L if for every  > 0 (given) there
exists a positive integer N such that n ≥ N =⇒ |an − L| < .

Notation. L = lim an or an → L.
n→∞

Examples 1.0.4.

(i) It is clear that the constant sequence {c}∞


n=1 , c ∈ R, has c as it’s limit.

1
(ii) Show that lim = 0.
n→∞ n

Solution. Let  > 0 be given. In order to show that 1/n approaches 0, we must show that
there exists an integer N ∈ N such that for all n ≥ N ,

1 1
− 0 = < .
n n

But 1/n <  ⇔ n > 1/. Thus, if we choose N ∈ N such that N > 1/, then for all n ≥ N,
1/n < .

(iii) Consider the sequence {(−1)n+1 }∞ n=1 . It is intuitively clear that this sequence does not
have a limit or it does not approach to any real number. We now prove this by definition.
Assume to the contrary, that there exists an L ∈ R such that the sequence {(−1)n+1 }∞ n=1
converges to L. Then for  = 12 , there exists an N ∈ N such that

1
|(−1)n+1 − L| < , ∀ n ≥ N. (1.1)
2
For n even, (1.1) says
1
| − 1 − L| < , ∀ n ≥ N. (1.2)
2
while for n odd, (1.1) says
1
|1 − L| < , ∀ n ≥ N. (1.3)
2
which is a contradiction as 2 = |1 + 1| ≤ |1 − L| + |1 + L| < 1.

As a first result we have the following uniqueness theorem:

1
Theorem 1.0.5. If {an }∞
1 is a sequence and if both n→∞
lim an = L and lim an = M holds, then
n→∞
L = M.
|L−M |
Proof. Suppose that L 6= M . Then |L − M | > 0. Let  = 2 . As lim an = L, there exists
n→∞
N1 ∈ N such that |an − L| <  for all n ≥ N1 . Also as lim an = M ,there exists N2 ∈ N such
n→∞
that |an − M | <  for all n ≥ N2 . Let N = max{N1 , N2 }. Then for all n ≥ N , |an − L| <  and
|an − M | < . Thus |L − M | ≤ |an − L| + |an − M | < 2 = |L − M |, which is a contradiction. ///

Definition 1.0.6. (Bounded sequence): A sequence {an } is said to be bounded above, if there
exists M ∈ R such that an ≤ M for all n ∈ N. Similarly, we say that a sequence {an } is bounded
below, if there exists N ∈ R such that an ≥ N for all n ∈ N. Thus a sequence {an } is said to be
bounded if it is both bounded above and below.
Theorem 1.0.7. Every convergent sequence is bounded.
Proof. Let {an } be a convergent sequence and L = lim an . Let  = 1. Then there exists N ∈ N
n→∞
such that |an − L| < 1 for all n ≥ N . Further,

|an | = |an − L + L| ≤ |an − L| + |L| < 1 + |L|, ∀ n ≥ N.

Let M = max{|a1 |, |a2 |, ..., |an−1 |, 1 + |L|}. Then |an | ≤ M for all n ∈ N. Hence {an } is
bounded. ///

1.1 Algebra of convergent sequences


Theorem 1.1.1. Let {an }∞ ∞
1 and {bn }1 be two sequences such that n→∞
lim an = L and lim bn =
n→∞
M . Then
(i) lim (an + bn ) = L + M .
n→∞

(ii) lim (can ) = cL, c ∈ R..


n→∞

(iii) lim (an bn ) = LM .


n→∞
 
an L
(iv) lim = if M 6= 0.
n→∞ bn M
Proof. (i) Let  > 0. Since an converges to L there exists N1 ∈ N such that

|an − L| < /2 ∀ n ≥ N1 .

Also, as bn converges to M there exists N2 ∈ N such that

|bn − M | < /2 ∀ n ≥ N2 .

Thus

|(an + bn ) − (L + M )| ≤ |an − L| + |bN − M | <  ∀ n ≥ N = max{N1 .N2 }.

2
(ii) Easy to prove. Hence left as an exercise to the students.

(iii) Let  > 0. Since an is a convergent sequence, it is bounded by M1 (say). Also as an


converges to L there exists N1 ∈ N such that

|an − L| < /2M ∀ n ≥ N1 .

Similarly as bn converges to M there exists N2 ∈ N such that

|bn − M | < /2M1 ∀ n ≥ N2 .

Let N = max{N1 , N2 }. Then

|an bn − LM | = |an bn − an M + an M − LM | ≤ |an (bn − M )| + |M (an − L)|


= |an ||bn − M | + M |an − L| < /2 + /2 = 

(iv) In order to prove this, it is enough to prove that if limn→∞ an = L, L 6= 0, then


limn→∞ 1/an = 1/L. Without loss of generality, let us assume that L > 0. Let  > 0
be given. As {an } forms a convergent sequence, it is bounded. Choose N1 ∈ N such that
an > L/2 for all n ≥ N1 . Also, as an converges to L, there exists N2 ∈ N such that
|an − L| < L2 /2 for all n ≥ N2 . Let N = max{N1 , N2 }. Then

1 1 |an − L| 2 L2 
n ≥ N =⇒ − = < 2 = . ///
an L |an L| L 2

Examples 1.1.2.
 ∞
5 5 1 1 1 1
(i) Consider the sequence . Then lim = lim 5 · · = 5 · lim · lim =
n2 1
n→∞ n 2 n→∞ n n n→∞ n n→∞ n
5 · 0 · 0 = 0.
∞
3n2 − 6n 3n2 − 6n

3 − 6/n
(ii) Consider the sequence . Notice that = → 3/5. Thus
5n2 + 4 1
2
5n + 4 5 + 4/n

3n2 − 6n 3 − 6/n 3 − lim n6


lim = lim = 4 = 3/5.
n→∞ 5n2 + 4 n→∞ 5 + 4/n 5 + limn→∞ n

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy