Menndez DiscourseStudies-2006
Menndez DiscourseStudies-2006
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Sage Publications, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Discourse Studies
REFERENCES
Esmat Babaii
University for Teacher Education, Tehran, Iran
as a linguistic approach to meaning in texts, systemic linguistics has (or has had)
common ground with text and discourse analysts from a range of perspectives . . .
There have also been points of connection with research in areas such as
sociolinguistics . . . and the ethnography of speaking . . . exploring ways in which
social and cultural contexts impact on language use ... As a semiotic approach, it
has common ground with semiotic theoreticians and those ... working in what has
become known as Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). (p. 21)
But it is very important to note that she points out that the distinctive mark of
SFL is 'to develop both a theory about language as social process and an
analytical methodology which permits the detailed and systematic description of
language patterns' (p. 21).
In the second chapter, 'What is (a) text?' she starts with two questions: what
is a text and how do we know when we have got one. She answers them following
Halliday and Hasan's pioneering work Cohesion in English (1976): text is a
semantic unit that involves the interaction of two main components: coherence
(the relationship to the context of situation) and cohesion (the relationship of the
elements within the text).
It is important to note that Eggins identifies two types of coherence: registerial
coherence ('a text has registerial coherence when we can identify one situation
in which all the clauses of the text could occur' [p. 29]), and generic coherence
('a text has generic coherence when we can recognize the text as an example of
a particular genre', p. 29). She modifies, terminologically speaking, Halliday and
Hasan's original presentation. They stated that coherence is a property of the
text that has two features: cohesion and register. But her modification is based
upon Halliday and Hasan's original aim.
In the third and the fourth chapters, she develops genre and register in detail.
From chapter six to eight, she gives a clear introduction to the grammar of the
clause (as necessary complement for the analysis of text). In chapter six, she
analyses the system of mood. Chapter seven is devoted to analysing meaning as
choice and the systems associated with them. Chapters eight, nine and ten are
centred on experiential meaning (transitivity), logical meaning (clause complex)
and textual meaning (theme). In the last chapter, she clearly shows how to apply
SFL to the analysis of a particular text.
One of the main tenets of SFL is that language cannot be thought of without
reference to context. And context should not be considered as something 'added'
to text analysis, but as part of it. Eggins's book shows it in the best possible way:
explaining SFL through different and very well chosen analyses of different texts.
As an introductory book, its organization proves to be very useful because it
can frame clause grammar analysis within the larger frame of text, register and
genre analysis and shows how they relate to each other. The volume is not only
an excellent introduction to SFL, but a book of reference to any discourse analyst
who wants to better understand this central approach as well.
REFERENCES