Digital Marketing
Digital Marketing
lecture 1. 1 article
1. Lamberton, C. and Stephen, A.T., (2016), “A Thematic Exploration of Digital, Social Media, and
Mobile Marketing Research's Evolution from 2000 to 2015 and an Agenda for Future Research,”
Journal of Marketing, 80(6): 146-72. Download
lecture 2 2 articles
2-1 Integrated marketing communiations: Batra, R., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Integrating marketing
communications: New findings, new lessons, and new ideas. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 122-145.
Download
2-2 Inbound marketing: Opreana, A., & Vinerean, S. (2015). A new development in online marketing:
Introducing digital inbound marketing. Expert Journal of Marketing, 3(1). Download
3-1 SEO, Search: Kritzinger, W.T. and Weideman, M. (2013), “Search Engine Optimization and Pay-per-
Click Marketing Strategies”, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, Vol. 23
No. 3, pp. 273–286. Download
3-2 Online Advertising: Goldfarb, A. (2014). What is different about online advertising? Review of
Industrial Organization, 44(2), 115-129. Download
lecture 4 4 articoli
Cascio Rizzo, GL, Berger, JA, and Villarroel Ordenes, F. (2023), “What Drives Virtual Influencer's
Impact?”, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4329150
Duffy, B. E. and Meisner, C. (2023), “Platform governance at the margins: Social media creators’
experiences with algorithmic (in)visibility,” Media, Culture & Society, 45(2), 285–304, DOI:
10.1177/01634437221111923
O’Meara, V. (2019), “Weapons of the Chic: Instagram Influencer Engagement Pods as Practices of
Resistance to Instagram Platform Labor,” Social Media + Society, 5(4), DOI:
10.1177/2056305119879671
Van Dijck, J. (2021), “Seeing the forest for the trees: Visualizing platformization and its governance,”
New Media & Society, 23(9), 2801–2819, DOI: 10.1177/1461444820940293
lecture 5 2 articoli
4-1 Business models: Zhang, X., Williams, A., & Polychronakis, Y. E. (2012). A comparison of e-
business models from a value chain perspective. EuroMed Journal of Business, 7(1), 83-101.
Download
4-2 Success factors: Colla, E., & Lapoule, P. (2012). E-commerce: exploring the critical success factors.
International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 40(11), 842-864. Download
lecture 6 2 articoli
6-1 Strategy: Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O., Pavlou, P., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business
strategy: toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2). Download
6-2 Capabilities: Day, George S. "Closing the marketing capabilities gap." Journal of marketing 75.4
(2011): 183-195. Download
lecture 7
7-1 Customer journeys: Edelman, D. C., & Singer, M. (2015). Competing on Customer Journeys.
Harvard Business Review, November 2015. Download
Supplementary reading
7-2 Designing customer experience: Grenha Teixeira, J., Patrício, L., Huang, K. H., Fisk, R. P., Nóbrega,
L., & Constantine, L. (2017). The MINDS method: Integrating management and interaction design
perspectives for service design. Journal of Service Research, 20(3), 240-258. Download
7-1 Customer experience: Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience
throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80 (6), pp: 69-96. Download
7-4 Augmented reality: Scholz, J., & Smith, A. N. (2016). Augmented reality: Designing immersive
experiences that maximize consumer engagement. Business Horizons, 59(2), 149-161. Download
Lecture 1
Cait Lamberton & Andrew T. Stephen A Thematic Exploration of Digital, Social Media, and Mobile
Marketing: Research Evolution from 2000 to 2015 and an Agenda for Future Inquiry.
Lecture 2
A New Development in Online Marketing: Introducing Digital Inbound Marketing Alin OPREANA*
and Simona VINEREAN
Integrated marketing communiations: Batra, R., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Integrating marketing
communications: New findings, new lessons, and new ideas. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 122-145.
1. Consistency:
Reinforcing the same persuasive message across
different communications.
Example: Volvo's "safety superiority" message
communicated consistently through various channels.
Channels include print and TV ads, PR, corporate
communications, website, digital means, and
sponsorships.
2. Complementarity:
Recognizing different strengths and weaknesses of
communication options.
Addressing varied brand-related information needs for
consumers.
Example: Volvo sponsors diverse events (golf, cultural,
ocean race) to enhance visibility and status,
complemented by sales promotions and financing
programs.
3. Cross-effects:
Communication effects are enhanced when consumers
have prior exposure to different options.
Example: Positive feelings and awareness from sports
or arts sponsorships influencing consumer
predisposition to consider the brand or shape
impressions during vehicle evaluation.
Consumer characteristics:
Motivation The motivation, or desire, to process incoming
information varies with the extent to which the consumer
views it as potentially helping with the brand choice task at
hand. This increases with the level of perceived risk (Cox
1967; Loewenstein et al. 2001; Mitchell 1999) and the
degree to which the category-level need is salient or
pressing—such as the geo-location of the consumer
(affecting the processing of mobile messages) or the degree
to which the consumer is in the search process (affecting the
processing of retargeted online advertising). Situational
factors may also matter in their potential to affect
consumers’ emotional state/mood and willingness or desire
to seek information.
Ability The consumer ability to process information
depends, among other factors, on the amount of prior
familiarity and knowledge with the brand and category.
Thus, consumers at the earliest stages of category search
might not be able to process in-depth attribute-level brand
comparison information (Alba and Hutchinson 1987), though
they should still be able to understand which brands are
more versus less relevant for their brand choice decisions (
Opportunity information is affected by several aspects of the
time and place of message exposure, such as whether the
consumer is under time pressure or in a physical setting
where (s)he can process the communications in depth.
Different media options vary in how strong they are along
these processing factors. Thus, certain media, such as
mobile or billboards, seem more suitable for messages that
remind or trigger action rather than for messages that aim
to persuade through detailed information. Other media, such
as online video or TV, naturally lend themselves to
messages that inject more emotion and imagery into brand
perceptions.
Research has also examined how various characteristics of
the communication itself (e.g., its modality, its executional
and message information, its source credibility) influence
the resulting outcomes from exposure (Stern and Resnick
1991). Creative strategies such as music, celebrities, special
effects, sex appeals, and fear appeals are all examples of
attentiongetting devices to increase consumer motivation to
process a communication and build awareness and salience,
though they may direct processing away from the brand or
its message in the process, hurting preference formation
(McGuire 1978). While much of the prior research using
traditional media should also apply to the newer media,
marketers need to think about communication content
idiosyncrasies in today’s digital environment, such as
different processing implications and outcomes for different
types of Facebook posts, tweets, and so on.
Communication outcomes
Depending on the stage of the consumer’s
processing journey, these multiple possible outcomes
vary in importance to a particular brand marketer.
CREATE AWARENESS AND SALIENCE
CONVEY DETAILED INFORMATION
CREATE IMAGERY AND PERSONALITY
BUILD TRUST
ELICIT EMOTIONS
INSPIRE ACTION
INSTILL LOYALTY
CONNECT PEOPLE
Communications matching model+ Communications
optimization model= NEW FRAMEWORK proposed by the
article. Lets see them in detail:
Communications matching model The communications matching model
matches the expected main and interactive effects of different media options with the
communications objectives for a brand, sequencing the former to best match the dominant need at
different stages along the consumer decision journey. The communication matching model thus
considers the needs/gaps in consumer knowledge and behaviours in terms of where different
targeted consumer segments are versus where they need to be, relative to the brand’s needs, and
then suggests the most appropriate media combinations that should best meet these needs/gaps at
each stage along the journey
See the stages on the paper!!
Communications optimization model:
7CS
First two are financial
Coverage Coverage is the proportion of the target audience reached by each communication
option employed, as well as the amount of overlap among those options
Cost To increase the cost efficiency of an IMC program, marketers can conduct A/B split
(multivariate design) field experiments, using tracking metrics on business metrics that feed into
return-oninvestment assessments. For instance, do those customers who are fans on a firm’s
Facebook page or followers of its Twitter account have a sufficiently higher purchase frequency? Do
they spend more, with fewer discounts? Ideally, such tests would use a randomized test versus
control design to obviate issues of causality (e.g., Facebook page/Twitter followers could otherwise
be consumers who already feel high brand affindaje
3-2 Online Advertising: Goldfarb, A. (2014). What is different about online advertising? Review of
Industrial Organization, 44(2), 115-129. Download
Abstract Drawing on the literature on online advertising, I argue that the fundamental economic
difference between online and offline advertising is a substantial reduction in the cost of targeting.
This cost reduction informs what I view as the main themes in the online advertising literature:
understanding advertising effectiveness, auctions, privacy, and antitrust.
1. Search Advertising:
Appears alongside algorithmic search results on search
engines like Google or Bing.
Advertisers can target users at the moment they express
intent through a search.
Priced using a specialized auction mechanism, with each
search query having a separate auction.
Typically charged on a "cost per click" (CPC) basis, where
advertisers pay when users click on their ads.
Allows advertisers to target customers based on specific
keyword strings.
2. Classified Advertising:
Appears on websites that do not provide other media content
or algorithmic search.
Examples include Craigslist, online jobs sites, and online
dating sites.
Craigslist is credited with the decline of offline classified ads in
local newspapers.
3. Display Advertising:
Main revenue generator for online media that are not search
engines.
Includes various formats such as banner ads, plain text ads
(e.g., Google's AdSense), media-rich ads, video ads, and ads
on social media platforms like Facebook.
Priced using different mechanisms, including specialized
auctions, negotiated purchases, or fixed prices.
Pricing often communicated as cost per thousand impressions
(CPM), and sometimes on a cost-per-click (CPC) basis.
Offers opportunities for targeting, including demographic
targeting (evolving from the 1990s), contextual targeting
(matching ads to website content), and behavioral targeting
(using past online behavior data).
Retargeting, a form of behavioral targeting, involves showing
ads to users based on their past searches or viewed content.
3 MODELS OF TARGETING
the widespread use of auctions for the pricing of advertising is new. This section therefore examines
why auctions, or the “crowdsourcing” of pricing, have become the dominant method for selling
online advertising. I argue that it is a result of reduced targeting costs online. It is driven by both the
need to price a large number of keywords in an efficient manner (targeting consumers) and a desire
to price discriminate between advertisers (essentially targeting advertisers). Both are a function of
the one-to-one communication between identifiable computers facilitated by the Internet.
Lecture 7
These four capabilities and the reliance on scrum teams help managers
create the perfect pattern for the best results when it comes to the
costumer journey
Cross-Functional Scrum Teams:
Managers building successful customer journeys rely on
"scrum teams" composed of specialists from IT, analytics,
operations, marketing, and other functions.
These teams are execution-oriented, fast, and agile.
Constant Testing and Iteration:
Scrum teams are constantly testing and iterating
improvements to enhance the customer journey.
Collectively, the teams aim to understand customers' wants
and needs at each step, making the next step worthwhile.
Key Questions for Journey Improvement:
Teams ask critical questions such as:
"What types of functionality, look and feel, and message
will propel customers to the next step?"
"How does the timing of prompts affect customers’
responses?"
Iterative Development Process:
Pursuing answers to these questions involves rounds of
development.
Teams pilot iterative digital-journey prototypes, analyze
operational and customer-use data, and measure the impact
on customer behavior resulting from each tweak to the
journey.