Paper14a Cholis Vol11
Paper14a Cholis Vol11
eISSN 2504-8457
Abstract
The power-cam mechanisms of Single Acting Pulley Actuator (SAPA) Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) utilizes combinations
of DC motor system that include gear reducers to actuate primary movable pulley sheaves on the transmission shaft. The secondary pulley
supported by spring provides a belt clamping force to prevent slips, while the secondary controls the rubber v-belt from slipping. Since the
methods of controlling these are similar, this paper only discusses the primary part. The servomotor regulates the axial movement of
primary movable pulley sheaves to shift the rubber v-belt placed between the sheaves, and change the belt-pulley contact radius. Changing
this contact radius means changing the CVT ratio. Computer simulation results are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the
proposed PD controller. The research outcome gives a significant result to complete 75.08 rotation of the CAM from lower gear ratio to
top gear ratio is less than 6.79 sec, with minimum error and less overshoot with a manual PD tuning contribution to the field of DC motor
based electro-mechanical CVT control system.
Keywords: Continuously variable transmission; power cam mechanisms; clamping force; contact radius.
1. Introduction
In the last decades, V-belt CVT(Continuously Variable Transmission) is a transmission having a speed ratio that can
be varied continuously over its allowable speed range. Its speed ratio may take on any value between its operational limit,
i.e. An infinite number of ratios are possible. A gearbox transmission, on the other hand, has a discrete number of fixed speed
ratios. This property of the V-belt CVT gives a better fuel economy compared with that of classical gearbox
transmission. Besides, the V-belt CVT has many advantages such as compact, light weight, low manufacturing cost
because it has a relatively small number of parts [1]. The rubber V-belt continuously variable transmission (CVT) has
been widely used in low-power vehicles such as snowmobiles and scooters because of its significant advantages over other
transmissions, including its simple construction, smooth operation, easy drivability, low cost, easy maintenance, etc. CVTs
allow the engine to operate near maximum power point by automatically varying speed, so theoretically, rubber V-belt CVTs
have an economic efficiency advantage over other transmissions [2]. However, in spite of the several advantages proposed by
a CVT system, the goals of higher fuel economy and better performance have not been realized significantly in a real
production vehicle. In order to achieve lower emissions and better performance, it is necessary to capture and understand the
detailed dynamic interactions in a CVT system so that efficient controllers could be designed to overcome the existing losses
and enhance the fuel economy of a vehicle [3]. To overcome this energy loss, the electromechanical actuated CVT system
becomes a viable solution, since this system only operates during changing the transmission ratio. The electromechanical
actuated CVT with a single acting pulley system was introduced in [4]. PID controller is suitable for fixed parameters
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address:nr.chls@gmail.com
78 | V O L 1 1 - I R S T C 2 0 1 7 & R E S P E X 2 0 1 7
processes that could be mathematically modeled using linear first or second order systems. However, an accurate model of a
real industrial process is difficult to obtain, since the process itself may have complex characteristics such as nonlinearity,
high order, delay-time, dead-time, etc. That cannot be easily modeled using a simple linear system [5]. In addition, the
process may be affected by parameter variations due to temperature, ageing components, noise, and load disturbance. For
these complex processes, tuning laws based on these inaccurate models are no longer adequate to attain the controller gains
properly. PID (Proportional, Integral and Derivative) controller has been the basis in simple linear control systems. It is a
well-known and well–established technique for various industrial control applications. This is mainly due to its simple design,
straight forward parameters tuning and robust performance. As actuators, DC servomotors are extensively used in many
automatic controls, including drive for robotic manipulators, machine tools, rolling machines, photocopy machines etc. PID
controllers are usually used to control these servomotors. Position controls utilizing PID can be seen in [6],[7],[8],[9],[10].
To design an effective PID controller, three gain parameters, namely, proportional gain, integral gain and derivative gain need
to be specified accordingly. The conventional approach to determine the PID parameters is to study the mathematical model
of the process and try to come up with a simple tuning law that provides a fixed set of gain parameters. One example of such
approach is the Ziegler-Nichols method [11]. This paper uses PID controller and introduces the Single Acting Pulley Actuator
Continuously Variable Transmission (SAPA CVT) ratio control with one DC motors as its actuators. This actuator works
only during transmission ratio changes, hence shortening actuator’s operation time and reducing energy loss.
2. Background of CVT
A basic CVT works just like a variator. It consists of a primary pulley, a secondary pulley and a rubber V-belt connecting
these two pulleys. Each of driver and driven pulley consists of a fixed and a movable pulley is given in fig. 1.(a). The fixed
pulleys are fixed on the shafts and the movable pulleys are able to move in the axial direction on the shafts.
Continuously variable transmission can be achieved by control of the pulley axial distance between the fixed and the
movable pulleys. If the movable pulley of the driver shaft is moved towards the fixed pulley, the V-belt is forced to
be pushed in the radial outward direction, which causes the belt pitch diameter to increase. Since the belt length and
the center distance between the shafts are fixed, the belt pitch diameter of the driven pulley decreases. Therefore, the
speed ratio decreases in a continuous manner. The variator geometry is given in fig. 1.(b).
(a) (b)
Fig. 1. (a) Principle of a V-belt CVT; (b) Variator geometry.
79 | V O L 1 1 - I R S T C 2 0 1 7 & R E S P E X 2 0 1 7
Transmission mechanism of the conventional V-belt CVT is shown on fig. 2.(a). Each of driver and driven pulley consists
of a fixed and a movable pulley. The fixed pulleys are fixed on the shafts and the movable pulleys are able to move in the
axial direction on the shafts. Continuously variable transmission can be achieved by control of the pulley axial distance
between the fixed and the movable pulleys. If the movable pulley of the driver shaft is moved towards the fixed pulley, the
V-belt is forced to be pushed in the radial outward direction, which causes the belt pitch diameter to increase. Since the belt
length and the center distance between the shafts are fixed, the belt pitch diameter of the driven pulley decreases. Therefore,
the speed ratio decreases in a continuous manner. Any desired speed ratio can be obtained by control of the pulley axial
displacement. Since the pulley axial displacement is controlled by axial force on the driver and the driven pulleys, an accurate
relationship between the speed ratio and the axial force is required to maintain an optimum driving condition. Also, the axial
forces are directly related with the belt tension. If the belt tension and associated axial forces are kept only as high as
necessary to prevent slip at all load levels, then an enormous improvement in belt life will result compared to tension set for
maximum design power. Therefore, we can say that it is an integral part of the V-belt CVT design to obtain an accurate
relationship between the axial force and torque load for given speed ratios.
Movable Pulley
Fixed Pulley
Power Cam
Belt
Gear
Reducer
Movable Pulley
Spring
Fixed Pulley Mechanism
(a) (b)
The Single Acting Pulley Actuator Continuously Variable Transmission (SAPA CVT) system utilizes servomotor as
actuators is shown on fig. 2.(b). The system consists of two sets of pulleys, namely primary pulley placed on input fixed
shaft, and secondary pulley placed on secondary fixed shaft. Each set of pulley has two movable sheaves that can be shifted
axially along the shaft. The primary motor actuates the primary pulley movement for transmission ratio change, while the
spring mechanism actuates the secondary pulley movement for clamping force [12]. A spring disc is inserted in the back of
each secondary pulley sheave to provide continuous clamping force to the belt, and to reduce excessive slip during
transmission ratio change. When the CVT is on an under drive position, the primary belt radius is minimum while the
secondary belt radius is maximum, the ratio change is called, the primary motor will actuate the primary pulley axially to the
new value of primary radius, and at the same time the spring mechanism will actuate the secondary pulley axially to provide
the optimal clamping force for preventing a belt slips [13]. These movements will stop if the desired ratio is achieved. When
the CVT is on the overdrive position, the primary belt radius is maximal, while the secondary belt radius is minimal.
If belt has fixed length and rotates without slip, then both pulleys and belt will move at the same tangential velocities. The
relationship between speed and running radii can be given as follows:
(1)
(2)
80 | V O L 1 1 - I R S T C 2 0 1 7 & R E S P E X 2 0 1 7
The implicit relationship between belt length and running radii can be defined as:
( ) ( ) ( ) (3)
( ) (4)
The relationship between running radii and pulley position can be given as:
( ) ( ) (5)
( ) ( ) (6)
By using equation (3) and (4), for c = 260 mm, and L= 853 mm, the relationship between running radii and belt wrapped
angle, ϴ, is shown in fig. 1.(b). By using equation (5), (6) and data from fig. 3.(a). By varying CVT ratio from 0.9 up to 2.8,
the relationship between pulley positions and CVT ratio can plotted in fig. 3.(b).
(a) (b)
Fig. 3. (a) Relationship between running radii and belt wrapped angle;
(b) Relationship between pulley positions and CVT ratio
The gear reducers are coupled with the servomotor shaft is shown in fig. 4, a gear reducer serves as a speed reducer and
torque multiplier. The gear reducer output is connected to power cam mechanism for shifting the pulley sheaves. The power
cam mechanism is used to move the pulley sheaves axially. The combination of gear reducers and power cam mechanism is
used to help the motor in providing significant torque to turn the power cam mechanism. It converts every 360 of rotation
into 2 millimeters axial movement. Therefore the motor have to turn 12.3 rev in order to turn 1 rev of the CAM. In order to
turn 75.08 to expend the cam to limit, the motor have to turn .
81 | V O L 1 1 - I R S T C 2 0 1 7 & R E S P E X 2 0 1 7
(a) (b)
The power cam mechanism set is the main mechanism for the movable pulley to move in X axis to change the diameter of
the belt driver pulley, resulting in ratio change in the transmission. The CAM is control by a DC electric motor through a
train of gears so that the torque for the CAM to rotate at high rpm can be step down is shown in fig. 5(a). Therefore, fig. 5(b)
is shown the maximum rotation of the CAM 75.08 (α) and based on the design maximum X axis distance for male CAM to
travel is 15mm. The rotation of the CAM will cause movement in X axis at moveable sheave of the driver pulley and the
relation of the two motions is as follow.
(a) (b)
Fig. 5. (a) Power Cam Mechanism; (b) Schematic of power cam mechanism
Simulation studies of the proposed PID controller are carried out in order to investigate its effectiveness in this position
control application. In these studies, the DC servomotor has the following important parameters as shown in Table 1.
The transfer function of a PID controller has the following form:
GPID K p K i / s K d s
(7)
82 | V O L 1 1 - I R S T C 2 0 1 7 & R E S P E X 2 0 1 7
where Kp, Ki, and Kd are the proportional, integral, and derivative gains, respectively. Another useful equivalent form of the
PID controller is given by:
GPID K p (1 1 /(Ti s) Td s
(8)
Where Ti=Kp/Ki and Td=Kd/Kp; Ti and Td are the integral time constant and the derivative time constant, respectively. The
tuning objective is to determine the suitable value of three parameters (Kp, Ki, and Kd) to satisfy certain control specifications.
In order to obtain the initial parameters of PID controller, the Astrom-Hagglund method [25] will be used to determine the
values of critical period of waveform oscillation (Tc) and critical gain (Kc). These two values could be obtained by running
the closed loop control of DC servomotor system utilizing relay feedback as a controller. The oscillation period of the output
waveform is considered as the critical period attained from a proportional feedback. Based on this critical period (see figure.
11), the critical gain can be derived as follow:
4d
Kc
a (9)
Where d is the amplitude of the relay output, and a is the amplitude of the waveform oscillation.
Based on these two values, the PID parameters (Kp, Ti , and Td) can be specified using Ziegler-Nichols formula (see Table 2.).
Parameters Values Kp Ti Td
Motor Voltage 24 V P 0.5 Kc
Inductance 0.0228 PI 0.45 Kc 0.85 Tc
Resistance 1.0564 PID 0.6 Kc 0.5 Tc 0.125 Tc
Back emf Constant 0.22052
Torque Constant 0.22052
Rotor Inertia 7.e-5
Friction Coefficient 0.00191
Based on these parameters, the simulation of the system was investigated. The simulation of the controller was performed
using Matlab-Simulink packages. Control performance is determined based on percent overshoot, settling time (ts), and
steady state error (ess). Two types of input excitation: step and sinusoidal waveform are used to examine the performance of
the conventional PID. In order to obtain initial parameters of PID, the Astrom-Hagglund method based on a relay feedback
controller is carried out to attain the critical period of waveform oscillation (Tc) and critical gain (Kc). The relay feedback
controller is used in a closed loop control application. The amplitude of the relay controller is set to 15 since the input
voltage in the range of [-24,+24 volts] is needed to drive the servo system. From simulation results, these following
parameters are found: Tc= 0.04 s, a = 0.0917, and d = 24 (fig. 6).
a
Tc
(a) (b)
Fig. 6. The results of relay feedback controller (a) Relay output; (b) Waveform of oscillation
83 | V O L 1 1 - I R S T C 2 0 1 7 & R E S P E X 2 0 1 7
By using equation (9), the critical gain (Kc) is 333.405. Then, the Ziegler-Nichols formula (see table 2.) is applied to find
the values of Kp, Ti , and Td. Finally, by using these values and equations (7),(8), the three parameters of PID can be specified
as follows: Kp=200, Ki =10002, and Kd=1. From these data, it can be seen that the value of the integral gain ( Ki) is much
bigger compare to other gains. By closely looking at the small amplitude of waveform oscillations, it can be seen that the
servo system exhibits a small steady state error of about 1.3 % (for set-point = 15 mm). This condition can be understood,
since the servo system utilizes gear reducers with a total gear set ratio of about (12.3:1) to supply pulley clamping force,
hence slowing down the axial pulley movement significantly. Based on this fact, it is reasonable to say that the integral gain
was not used for controlling this kind of servo system, since the system behavior has already had a small tolerable steady
state error. PID controller variations are shown in the table 3.
From table 3, it can be seen that the value of the integral gain (Ki) is much bigger compared to other gains. Based on the
system behaviour performed during the relay feedback experiment, a small tolerable steady state error has occurred; therefore
the integral gain is not used for controlling this kind of system because the use of big integral gain makes the system
unstable.
Fig. 7.(a) shows the results of relay feedback experiment of the DC motor to actuate pulley axial position, long settling
time up to 96s after all PID parameters are implemented to basic PID controller scheme, then settling time become 56s after
reduce Kd . The smaller the integral gain, the better the system output response. The PD controller can be considered has a
good performance in terms of percent overshoot, settling time less 1.98s and zero steady state error as shown in fig. 7.(b).
(a) (b)
Fig. 7. (a) Response curve for PID controller variations; (b) Response curve for PD controller with manual tuning of
KP=100 & Kd=0.3
5. Conclusion
The simulation results has significantly improved the performance of the conventional PD controller to complete 75.08
rotation of the CAM from lower gear ratio to top gear ratio is less than 6.79 sec (CVT ratio from 0.9 up to 2.8), in terms of
percent overshoot and steady state error, both controllers perform well for the Single Acting Pulley Actuator (SAPA)
Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) system utilizes.
84 | V O L 1 1 - I R S T C 2 0 1 7 & R E S P E X 2 0 1 7
References
[1] Kwangwon K and Hyunsoo K 1989 Axial forces of a V-belt CVT Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology vol 3
no 1 pp 56-61
[2] Zhu C, Liu H and Tian J 2010 Experimental investigation on the efficiency of the pulley-drive CVT International Journal
of Automotive Technology vol 11 no 2 pp 257-261
[3] Nilabh S and Imtiaz H 2009 A review on belt and chain continuously variable transmissions (CVT): Dynamics and
control, Mechanism and Machine Theory vol 44 no 1 pp 19-41
[4] Van D M, Rosielle, Bonsen and Klaassen 2004 Design of An Electromechanical Ratio and Clamping Force Actuator for
a Metal V-Belt Type CVT, 7th International Symposium on Advanced Vehicle Control (AVEC’04) Arhem Netherland
[5] Bambang S, Kamarul B T, Hishamuddin J and Sugeng A 2006 DC Motor Position Control for Pulley Axial Movement of
an Electromechanical Dual Acting Pulley (EMDAP) CVT System, 1st Regional Conference on Vehicle Engineering &
Technology, Kuala Lumpur Malaysia.
[6] Shi J, Xu D, and Wang Z 2000 Hybrid Stepping Motor Position Servo System Based On DSP IECON 2000 20th Annual
Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society IEEE Vol 2 pp1475-1479.
[7] Habib, Maki, 2001 Designing Fuzzy Logic Controllers for DC Servomotors Supported by Fuzzy Logic Control
Development Environment In IECON’01: The 27th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society
[8] Yu Y, Wen G W, De J Y and Ge D 2002 A Fuzzy Parameters Adaptive PID Controller Design of Digital Positional
Servo System In Proc. Of The First International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics Beijing
[9] Yusuf I, Bulale, Salami, Marizan S 2003 Design and Development of DSP-based hybrid Controller For Servo Driver
Applications In Proceeding of 2003 IEEE Conference on Control Applications Vol 1 23-25 pp 773-778
[10] Sugeng A, Kamarul B T, Hishamuddin J, Hussein and Bambang S 2007 Adaptive Neural Network Optimisation Control
of ICE for Vehicle with Continuously Variable Transmission ICIAS 2007: International Conference on Intelligent &
Advanced Systems Vols 1-3 257-262
[11] Hyung S H, Jeng N C, Won H L and Jin K K 1999 A Tuning for The PID Controller Utilizing Fuzzy Theory IJCNN’99
International Joint Conference on Neural Network Vol. 4 10-16 pp 2210-2215
[12] Mohd E Z, Kamarul B T, Hussein. Bambang S, Aishah D 2010 Clamping Force Characteristic Study of Power
Screw Mechanism in EMDAP 3rd International Graduate Conference on Engineering, Science and Humanities IGCESH
[13] Bambang S, Kamarul B T, Hishamuddin J and Sugeng A 2006 Ratio Control Of An Electromechanical Dual Acting
Pulley – Continuously Variable Transmission (EMDAP- CVT) System Using PD-Fuzzy Logic Controlle Regional
Postgraduate Conference on Engineering and Science (RPCES‘06) 26-27 July, Johor Bahru Malaysia
85 | V O L 1 1 - I R S T C 2 0 1 7 & R E S P E X 2 0 1 7