Ec 1
Ec 1
Unmet expectations When expectations are created and not realized, a great deal of negativity can result. Unfulfilled promises to customers, smaller than expected salary increases after a great deal of voluntary overtime, resources allocated to a different department without explanation Unreasonable or unclear policies These can cause much argument, confusion and wasted resources. When rules and standards are also inequitably applied eg one set for management and another for the workers, the credibility of management regarding its value system can be significantly undermined. Interdependent tasks Wherever the input to one process is dependent on the output from another before the finished product is complete, the potential for conflict is high. Every organisation is familiar with the stress surrounding the closing of the books at year-end, which depends on correct and final information from various departments. Each of these departments has its own priorities, and is not particularly concerned or even aware of someone elses deadlines. Organisational complexity The larger, more distributed and complex an organisation is, the more onerous it is to communicate effectively to all parties, as it becomes difficult to reach exactly the right person. In addition, group loyalties can become strong and territorial, with intrusion by another group often being viewed with hostility. Much time and energy is wasted in resolving this kind of dysfunctional conflict. Incompatible personalities Conflict is inherent with incompatible personalities, and where value systems encourage stereotype perceptions. Changing management styles over the years from paternalistic, hierarchic control to participative, interactive and innovative management have also tended to create discord amongst senior managers who resist change, and their more junior counterparts and workers who sense this resistance. This is particularly destructive where one party has the power to impose his will over another. Unresolved conflict Where conflict is allowed to continue unchecked, the focus on core business is replaced by a negative concentration on personalities and the grapevine of rumour flourishes. Unclear job boundaries These result in employee confusion and criticism of one another, as well as management, and are extremely counterproductive. Responsibility for tasks is abrogated and it becomes virtually impossible to determine accountability. Limited resources Competition for limited resources is also a factor for conflict. The classic example here is the normal budgetary requirements that usually exceed available funds. This is probably the most prevalent and familiar source of conflict in all organisations. Deadlines or time pressures Under conditions of ureasonable deadlines or extreme time pressures, staff become understandably stressed and irritable, and give way naturally to expressing anger. Reluctance on their part to discuss the situation openly with management for fear of being thought incompetent or subversive makes this a difficult issue to deal with. Decision-making Decisions which are made either by consensus or collectively are seldom reached without at least one dissenting voice, lengthy deliberation and reluctant compromise. A well-known example is wage negotiations with trade unions. The delay in making decions also leads to uncertainty and dissatisfaction.