Module 2 - Written Assignment
Module 2 - Written Assignment
University of Windsor
The ultimate goal of educators should be to guide students in recognizing clear learning
goals throughout the learning process so they can gradually become self-aware learners who are
activators in their own learning. The Ontario Growing Success document outlines three main
areas of feedback that are essential for students in learning from mistakes and narrowing the gap
between developing good work and great work. Self feedback, peer feedback, and descriptive
feedback are three areas that will be discussed in relation to learning in the string classroom.
When any classroom engages students in taking ownership of their learning, students become
excited to learn and can participate in creating learning goals for their subjects. The string
classroom must implement regular learning goals during rehearsals and teach students what
success criteria looks like. Furthermore, educators need to model and teach students how to give
positive and meaningful feedback to their peers in order to maintain passionate and energetic
students who are excited to raise expectations of excellence in their craft, and contribute to a
The Ontario Growing Success document says that “assessment for the purpose of
improving student learning is seen as both ‘assessment for learning’ and ‘assessment as
learning.’1 In assessment for learning, descriptive feedback through use of a rubric and teacher
modeling is often the foundation of preparing students to be independent and critical learners. A
detailed learning target, or rubric, is provided for students to recognize what a weak example, an
improving example, and a strong example looks like. After students begin presenting their
learning, a teacher can model positive feedback by giving examples of 3 things the student did
1
Growing Success, p. 28.
well, 2 things that can be improved, and some practical steps that can be taken to get closer to the
learning target. Below is an example of descriptive feedback and success criteria for a beginner
Bowing The student plays a The student plays a The student can
bow circle at the end of bow circle at the end of sometimes play a bow
each phrase and can each phrase but circle at the end of each
play in tempo. struggles to play in phrase.
tempo.
Intonation The student confidently The student usually The student sometimes
plays in tune alone and plays in tune. plays in tune.
with accompaniment.
Tempo The student can play The student can play in The student can play
the piece at a tempo at a slow the piece, but not at a
recommended temp metronome pace. consistent tempo.
and include a
ritardando as written in
the music.
Articulation/Dynamics/ The student plays The student sometimes The student plays with
Presentation martelé bows with plays martelé bowings minimal articulation or
staccato and during lines 1/2/4 and is dynamic contrast.
expression during lines beginning to show
1/2/4, and can contrast in line 3.
demonstrate legato and
dynamic contrast in line
3.
Once a class is familiar with what makes a good performance of Allegro, they can begin to work
towards meeting the “proficient” category in their practice. If the learning target is posted in a
visible space in the classroom, students can refer to it often and begin to recognize where their
own playing, and the playing of their peers fits into the rubric. Descriptive feedback is outlined
as “feedback that is clear, specific, meaningful, and timely to support improved learning and
achievement.”2 Once students feel ready to give an initial performance of their learning, the
teacher must model positive feedback by giving positive feedback, areas to work on, and
“I love the way you stood so confidently as you played. Your intonation was really strong
on the E string, and you played in a tempo that I could easily march to. Once you moved
your left hand to the A string, it felt like you could practice that section at a slower pace
to make each note sound clearer. How about we practice that section as a group, and try
playing it at different tempos and with different types of bow sounds: legato, martelé,
In this case, the teacher involves the whole class in the learning and supports the performer in
Once students are familiar with this assessment for learning feedback model, the teacher
can begin to include students in creating success criteria for new pieces they will learn as a group
and assessment as learning can begin. Students can listen to multiple recordings of a new piece
while following along with the sheet music and decide what the learning targets should be. The
Growing Success document says, “Once students, with the ongoing support of the teacher, have
learned to recognize, describe, and apply success criteria related to particular learning goals, they
2
Ibid, p. 6.
can use this information to assess their own and others’ learning.”3 After a positive feedback
environment is modeled by the teacher, and the learning targets and rubric are created as a class,
peer feedback becomes more accepted and meaningful for students. The teacher can begin by
asking general questions during rehearsal such as, “What are some things you think went well
during bars 1-8?” and “What do you think are some areas we need to work on in bars 1-8?” The
students can refer to their decided success criteria and begin to offer things that their instrument
sections did well and can also improve on. It is also important that students are given visual lists
of positive and constructive feedback words to use when sharing their thoughts with their peers
in order to avoid comments that may take away from the positive learning environment. Using
these models will naturally lead to students feeling more comfortable when giving solo
to assess their own learning, set specific goals, and plan next steps for their learning.”4 This is a
natural progression for students after experiencing successful feedback environments with their
teacher and their peers. Ideally, a student should have time to discuss their learning goals with
the teacher in a private lesson. Time does not always allow for this in a public school
environment, but the teacher should prioritize taking time out of rehearsal at regular intervals for
conferences with individual students, or small groups of students. During this time, other
working on music theory. Some questions that could guide individual conferences could be,
“What are some of your greatest strengths in your playing?” and “What areas in your playing do
you want to improve?” The student should be encouraged to take time to reflect on their own
3
Ibid, p. 35.
4
Ibid, p. 6.
learning goals for an upcoming project or technical skill, and make a list of what success criteria
looks like for them. The student can confer with the teacher on creating a plan to reach their
goals by making a step by step process. This could include a discussion on how much time is
needed in practicing at home, how many repetitions of a particular phrase is needed, what tempo
to practice at and when to present what is practiced. If using the example of the piece Allegro
● Practice the A major scale using a “pepperoni pizza” rhythm for each note.
● Play the entire piece (rhythms only) on open A only, then open E string only, to focus on
● Spend time practicing the finger pattern in bar 4 by playing it with a slow metronome
● Practice quick bow circles and landing softly on the string by playing the A major scale
Guided self-feedback will allow the student to eventually create a structured and goal-driven
practice time on their own by using the models they’ve become so accustomed to.
Some of the challenges of implementing a positive feedback routine is available time, and
the pressure of producing repertoire in time for scheduled concerts. If a string class only meets
once or twice a week, time is spent on tuning instruments, playing warm up games, rehearsing
repertoire and communicating with parents. Positive assessment may often feel like an after-
thought and students become used to being told what to do. This can lead to discouragement in
their learning and enrollment may start to dwindle. Despite the demands on a string teacher, it is
crucial that they create a regular routine of sharing the learning target, teaching students to
develop their own success criteria, and developing self-aware learners who feel pride in their
learning and can achieve their own goals as musicians. Each rehearsal should start by spending a
few minutes reviewing the learning target, discussing what success criteria looks like and during
each break, spend time modeling positive feedback by sharing what is going well, what needs to
improve, and how to get there. The teacher could consider choosing specific days each month to
focus on reviewing what positive feedback looks like, and giving time to assessments. When
students are aware that these days are part of routines, they can prepare their own playing for
assessment, and come up with their own ideas of their strengths and areas to work on, instead of
Dylan Wiliam, educator and advocate for assessment reforms in schools said, “feedback
should cause thinking. It should be focused; it should relate to the learning goals that have been
shared with the students; and it should be more work for the recipient than the donor. Indeed, the
whole purpose of feedback should be to increase the extent to which students are owners of their
own learning.”5 By weaving the feedback models into string rehearsals, it will become natural
and less formal, yet it will become the thing that ties all learning together and creates an
engaging learning environment for string learners. As these learners become more self-aware,
they will take their confidence into their other classrooms and be able to demonstrate peer and
self feedback in other learning areas. This leads to a unified school environment and prepares
students to be confident and encouraging adults who can contribute positive feedback to their
5
Dylan Wiliam, Embedded Formative Assessment.
References
Education Scotland. (Dylan Wiliam). Self and peer assessment - Dylan Wiliam. July 27, 2016.
[Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/YtP4X5Vls9Y?si=Qo3hDsbymD2AAGHl.
El Education. Descriptive Feedback Helps All Students Reach Proficiency. January 19, 2018.
[Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/epJs3PZkTU4?si=KjT7yGiYr_qkdEQa.
Growing Success: Assessment, Evaluation, and Reporting in Ontario Schools, First Edition,
Covering Grades 1-12, 2010.
https://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/policyfunding/growsuccess.pdf.
NWEA Videos. (Dylan Wiliam). Dylan William unpacks formative assessment. December 14,
2012. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/kPf0nQFfv50?si=ilMhbY7Uyzn7iSf5.
Spencer, John. (John Spencer). Empowering Students to Own the Assessment Process. March 3,
2020. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/8WxvVgXC_NY?si=skCRBm-0CD7I03XX.
TCDSB 21C. Video 2 Developing Learning Goals. February 18, 2015. [Video]. YouTube.
https://youtu.be/wLUQ2phoqtU?si=mOawpeKjJZII6Qhi.