M3/4/5F22 Mathematical Finance N. H. Bingham Imperial College London, 6 October - 15 December 2017
M3/4/5F22 Mathematical Finance N. H. Bingham Imperial College London, 6 October - 15 December 2017
2017
N. H. BINGHAM
Books.
Course text: Ch. 1-6 of
[BK] N. H. BINGHAM and Rüdiger KIESEL: Risk-neutral valuation: Pric-
ing and hedging of financial derivatives, 2nd ed., CUP, 2004 (1st ed. 1998).
Alternatives:
S. E. SHREVE: Stochastic calculus for finance. Vol. I: The binomial asset
pricing model; Vol. II: Continuous-time models, Springer, 2004.
T. MIKOSCH: Elementary stochastic calculus, with finance in view, World
Scientific, 1998.
1
Hall, 1985.
[H1] HULL, J. (1995): Introduction to futures and options markets (2nd ed),
Prentice-Hall, (‘baby Hull’), or
[H2] HULL, J. (1993): Options, futures and other derivative securities (2nd
ed.), Prentice-Hall (‘Hull’).
2
[1st ed. Wiley 1987].
[AA] S. ASMUSSEN and H. ALBRECHER, Ruin probabilities, 2nd ed.,
World Scientific, 2010 [1st ed., S. Asmussen, 2000].
[Kyp] Andreas E. Kyprianou, Fluctuations of Lévy processes with applica-
tions: Introductory lectures, 2nd ed., Springer, 2014 [1st ed. 2006].
[RSST] T. ROLSKI, H. SCHMIDLI, V. SCHMIDT and J. L. TEUGELS,
Stochastic processes for insurance and finance, Wiley, 1999.
Assessed Coursework: One assignment, 10% credit, Week 6 (due Week 7).
CONTENTS
I. PROBABILITY BACKGROUND [c. 2.5h]
§1. Area: prelude to measure
§2. Basics: recapitulation from Years 1 and 2
§3. The Poisson process; compound Poisson processes
§4. Transforms.
3
IV. STOCHASTIC PROCESSES IN DISCRETE TIME [c. 2.5h].
§1. Filtrations and information flow
§2. Discrete-parameter stochastic processes
§3. Discrete-parameter martingales
§4. Martingale convergence
§5. Martingale transforms
§6. Stopping times and optional stopping
§7. The Snell envelope and optimal stopping
§8. Doob decomposition
§9. Examples
4
VIII. INSURANCE MATHEMATICS [c. 4.5h]
§1. Insurance background.
§2. The Poisson process & compound Poisson processes (ctd).
§3. Renewal theory.
§4. The ruin problem.
§5. Lundberg’s inequality.
§6. The ruin problem and the renewal equation.
§7. Cramér’s estimate of ruin.
§8. More on insurance; Postscript to Insurance.
Exam
Exam in the summer. Standard format: M3F22, 4 questions; M4F22/M5F22,
five questions; Q5 Mastery Question.
5
Ideal preparation would be a full course in Measure Theory (such as M3P19
Measure and Integral, Autumn Term), and then Probability (M3P6, Spring
Term). But only a minority of students attending this course will have had
these. So, we deal with necessary measure-theoretic preliminaries in Chapter
III. In the time available, one cannot prove the guts of technical measure
theory – the key approximation arguments. So we quote these, confining
proofs to what goes before and what comes afterwards (both much easier).
(b) Economics.
Finance is a small and specialised part of Economics. Ideal preparation
would also include a good grounding in Economics. There would not be room
for this in the Maths curriculum here, and most of you will not have an Eco-
nomics qualification from school. So again, we have to take a lot for granted;
we cover the necessary economic and financial background, in Chapter I.
In this regard, please bear three things in mind:
1. Anything important enough becomes political (M. Maurice Couve de
Murville). This stuff is certainly important.
2. Politics in not an exact science (Bismarck). But,
3. Mathematics is an exact science.
We will be doing lots of mathematics – in particular, we derive the Black-
Scholes formula. We will extend calculus, the most powerful single weapon
we have, to become probabilistic (Itô calculus) and apply it to these prob-
lems. But, there are limits to which finance, economics, or anything involving
human psychology, is mathematicisable. As always in Applied Mathematics,
we have to be on guard: if we don’t simplify enough, we can’t do anything;
if we over-simplify, we can do things, but can’t trust our conclusions.
Just as important as the technical mathematics, you need to think about
the systemic faults at the geofinancial/economic/political level thrown up by
the crisis of 2007-08 on (Credit Crunch, etc.). Any prospective employer in
the financial services industry should ask you questions about this, and your
views on it, in interview. We spend half of one lecture on such things (II.10,
– not examinable). The rest is down to you.
For a range of views here, see e.g.
Quantitative Finance 15 no. 4 (2015), Special Issue on Interlinkages & Sys-
temic Risk, esp. Dempster’s review of the Admati-Hellwig book, 579-582;
N. H. BINGHAM: The Crash of 2008: A mathematician’s view. Significance
5 no. 4 (2008), 173-175 [on my home-page, under Papers]. NHB