SMS Last Revision For Comerical
SMS Last Revision For Comerical
participants
and structure.
Outline
• The 5 W’s
– Who are you ? What is your preferred name
in class?
– Where do you work?
– What is your job title, and
– What are your main responsibilities?
– Why are you attending this course?
• Please define your expectations
SMS course introduction
Realistic
implementation
Safety
management
Performance
based
ICAO
Prescriptive SARPS
Course contents
• Module 1 – SMS course introduction
• Module 2 – Basic safety concepts
• Module 3 – Introduction to safety management
• Module 4 – Hazards
• Module 5 – Risks
• Module 6 – SMS regulation
• Module 7 – Introduction to SMS
• Module 8 – SMS planning
• Module 9 – SMS operation
• Module 10 – Phased approach to SSP and SMS
implementation
SMS course introduction
Safety Module 10
Phased approach to
Management SSP and SMS
Implementation
System
Module 8 Module 9
SMS planning SMS operation
2. Evaluation of participants’
performance
1. Overall course evaluation
• A form for course evaluation will be
provided the last day of the course.
• You will be asked to complete this form to
provide feedback on:
– All course’s activities
– The instructors
– Ways and means to improve the training.
2. Evaluation of participants’
performance
• Daily progress evaluation
• A final evaluation test of one hour duration will be
administered on the last day of the course.
• Attendance: 25%
• Assignment: 25%
• Final Exam: 50%
• Total: 100%
• Exam Pass: 70 %
2. Evaluation of participants’
performance
• Objectives of the final evaluation:
– verify that participants have understood the
planning, implementation and operation of safety
management systems, to be able to certify and
oversee the SMS of service providers;
– have understood the importance of its relationship
with the State safety programme (SSP);
– in accordance with ICAO requirements.
بسم هللا الرحمن الرحيم
Building an SMS
Safety Module 10
Phased approach to
Management SSP and SMS
Implementation
System
Module 8 Module 9
SMS planning SMS operation
30
Weight & Balance
WHY? HOW?
The evolution of safety
thinking
TECHNICAL FACTORS
HUMAN FACTORS
TODAY
ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS
Organizational processes
Workplace Latent
conditions conditions
Technology
Training
Active
Regulations Defences
failures
Organizational processes
Organizational processes
Workforce stability
Workplace Qualifications and Latent
conditions experience conditions
Morale
Credibility
Active
Ergonomics Defences
failures
...
Organizational processes
Workplace Latent
conditions conditions
Errors
Active
failures
Violations Defences
Errors Violations
Skill-based Errors
Mistakes
Optimizing
Slips of Lapses of routine situational exceptional
action memory
Rule-
Knowledge based
based
mistakes
mistakes
» The failures caused by those in direct contact with the
system, i.e., pilot or technicians who are working on the
aircraft, are considered to be active failures..
These failures are errors or violations that have a
direct and immediate effect on system.
Reinforce
Contain
Active
Defences
failures
People and safety
• Aviation workplaces involve
complex interrelationships
among its many components
• To understand operational
performance, we must
understand how it may be
affected by the
interrelationships among the
various components of the Source: Dedale
B
Processes and outcomes
Error:
causes and
consequences
are not linear in
their magnitude
People and safety – SHELL model
• Understanding the relationship between people and
operational contexts
Software
S Hardware
Environment
H L L
Live ware
E Live ware, other
persons
Operational performance and technology
• In production-intensive
industries like
contemporary aviation,
technology is essential
• As a result of the massive
introduction of
technology, the
operational consequences
of the interactions
between people and
technology are often
overlooked, leading to
human error
Understanding operational errors
Statistically, millions of
operational errors are made
before a major safety
breakdown occurs
Accident investigation – Once in a million flights
• Error reduction
strategies intervene at
the source of the error
by reducing or
eliminating the
contributing factors
– Human-centred
design
– Ergonomic factors
– Training
–…
Three strategies for the control of human error
• Error capturing
strategies intervene once
the error has already
been made, capturing the
error before it generates
adverse consequences
– Checklists
– Task cards
– Flight strips
–…
Three strategies for the control of human error
• Error tolerance
strategies intervene to
increase the ability of a
system to accept errors
without serious
consequence
– System redundancies
– Structural inspections
–…
Understanding violations – Are we ready?
Accident
High
Incident
System’s
production
objective(s)
Violation space
Low
Minimum System output Maximum
Culture
• Culture binds people together as members of
groups and provides clues as to how to behave in
both normal and unusual situations
Organizational
National
Professional
Three distinct cultures
• National culture encompasses the value system
of particular nations
• Organizational/corporate culture differentiates
the values and behaviours of particular
organizations (e.g. government vs. private
organizations)
• Professional culture differentiates the values and
behaviours of particular professional groups (e.g.
pilots, air traffic controllers, maintenance
engineers, aerodrome staff, etc.)
• No human endeavour is culture-free
Organizational/corporate culture
• Sets the boundaries for acceptable behaviour in
the workplace by establishing norms and limits
• Provides a frame work for managerial and
employee decision-making
– “This is how we do things here, and how we
talk about the way we do things here”
• Organizational/corporate culture shapes – among
many others – safety reporting procedures and
practices by operational personnel
Safety culture
• A trendy notion with potential for misperceptions
and misunderstandings
– A construct, an abstraction
– It is the consequence of a series of
organizational processes (i.e., an outcome)
• Safety culture is not an end in itself, but a
means to achieve an essential safety
management prerequisite:
– Effective safety reporting
Organizational Culture
Values
National Culture Professional Norms
Psychological
Laws/Regulations
Industry Standards
System/
Behavioral Outcomes
Environment
Information Flexibility
People are knowledgeable about the human, technical and People can adapt reporting
when facing unusual
organizational factors that determine the safety of the circumstances, shifting
system as a whole. from the established mode
to a direct mode thus
Willingness allowing information to
quickly reach the
People are willing to appropriate decision-
report their errors and
Effective safety making level.
experiences. reporting
Learning
People have the
competence to draw
Accountability conclusions from safety
People are encouraged (and rewarded) for providing information systems and
essential safety-related information. However, there is a the will to implement major
clear line that differentiates between acceptable and reforms.
unacceptable behaviour.
Three options
• Organizations and the management of
information
– Pathological – Hide the information
Organizational processes
Workplace Latent
conditions conditions
Active
Defences
failures
Points to remember
1. The organizational accident.
`
Building an SMS
Safety Module 10
Phased approach to
Management SSP and SMS
Implementation
System
Module 8 Module 9
SMS planning SMS operation
Management levels
Resources Resources
Protection Production
The management dilemma
Resources +
Protection
Production
Catastrophe
The management dilemma
+ Resources
Production
Protection
Bankruptcy
Safety space
Bankruptcy
Protection
Catastrophe
Number of occurrences
1–5 Accidents
Organization
Navigational aids
Baseline performance
“Practical drift”
Predictive Proactive Reactive Reactive
Organization
System Surveys Accident
Analysis Audits ASRS and incident
Design SDR reports
Performance
Assessment
Highly efficient VeryAssessment
efficient Efficient Insufficient
Desirable management
levels
The imperative of change
• As global aviation activity and complexity
continues to grow, traditional methods for
managing safety risks to an acceptable level
become less effective and efficient
The changing of the guard
• Traditional – Accident/serious incident investigation
– Aviation system performs most of the time as per
design specifications (base line performance)
– Compliance based
– Outcome oriented
• Evolving – Safety management
– Aviation system does not perform most of the time
as per design specifications (practical drift)
– Performance based
– Process oriented
Safety management – Eight building blocks
Identify
hazards
Collect
Re-evaluate additional
control Assess
hazard consequences
strategies data
Approve Develop
Assign control elimination/
responsibilities mitigation
strategies strategies
In summary
• Managing safety requires resources
• Types of hazards
– Natural
– Technical
– Economic
Examples of natural hazards
• Severe weather or climatic
events:
– E.g.: hurricanes, major
winter storms, drought,
tornadoes, thunderstorms
lightning, and wind shear
• Adverse weather
conditions:
– E.g.: Icing, freezing
precipitation, heavy rain,
snow, winds, and
restrictions to visibility
Examples of natural hazards
• Geophysical events:
– E.g.: earthquakes, volcanic
eruptions, tsunamis, floods
and landslides
• Geographical conditions:
– E.g.: adverse terrain or large
bodies of water
• Environmental events:
– E.g.: wildfires, wildlife activity,
and insect or pest infestation
• Public health events:
– E.g.: epidemics of influenza
or other diseases
Examples of technical hazards
• Deficiencies
regarding:
– E.g.: aircraft and aircraft
components, systems,
subsystems and related
equipment
– E.g.: an organization’s
facilities, tools, and
related equipment
– E.g.: facilities, systems,
sub-systems and related
equipment that are
external to the
organization
Examples of economics hazards
• Major trends
related to:
– Growth
– Recession
– Cost of material or
equipment
– Etc.
Examples of hazards
Automation events Unfamiliar phraseology
ATC procedures
Weather
Missed approaches
Terrain
Runway inspections
Weather
Airspace
Runway crossings
reclassification
System malfunctions
Examples of hazards
FO(D) Constructions
Vehicles in apron
Weather
Runway inspections
Security issues
Obstacles
Non standard
procedures
Heavy traffic
Noise restrictions
Wildlife
Second fundamental – Hazard identification
• In order to identify hazards, consider:
– Design factors, including equipment and task
design
– Procedures and operating practices,
including documentation and checklists
– Communications, including means,
terminology and language
–…
Second fundamental – Hazard identification
• … consider:
– Organizational factors, such as company
policies for recruitment, training, remuneration
and allocation of resources
– Work environment factors, such as ambient
noise and vibration, temperature, lighting and
protective equipment and clothing
– ...
Second fundamental – Hazard identification
• … consider:
– Regulatory factors, including the applicability
and enforceability of regulations; certification of
equipment, personnel and procedures; and the
adequacy of oversight
– Defences including detection and warning
systems, and the extent to which the equipment
is resilient against errors and failures
– Human performance, including medical
conditions and physical limitations
Sources of hazard identification
• Internal
– Flight Data Analysis
– Company voluntary
reporting system
– Audits and surveys
• External
– Accident reports
– State mandatory
occurrence system
• As a reminder
– Predictive
– Proactive
– Reactive
Hazard identification
• By whom?
– By anybody
– By designated personnel
• How?
– Through formal
processes
– Depends on the
organization
• When?
– Anytime
– Under specific conditions
Hazard identification
• Specific conditions
– Unexplained increase
in safety-related
events or infractions
– Major operational
changes are foreseen
– Periods of significant
organizational change
Third fundamental – Hazard analysis
ABC of hazard analysis
• Tracking and
analysis of hazards
is facilitated by
standardizing:
– Definitions
– Understanding
– Validation
– Reporting
– Measurement
– Management
Fourth fundamental – Documentation of hazards
Proactive method
Develop control
• ASR Implement Safety
and mitigation
• Surveys strategies bulletins
strategies
• Audits
Hazards
Report
Predictive method distribution
• FDA Inform Re-evaluate
person(s) strategies
• Direct responsible for
observation implementing and Seminars and
systems strategies processes workshops
Feedback
The focus of hazard identification
Hazard identification is a
wasted effort if restricted to
Accidents
the aftermath of rare
1–5
occurrences where there is
Serious incidents
serious injury, or significant
30 – 100
damage.
Incidents
100 – 1000
Latent conditions
1000 – 4000 “Practical drift”
SMS
Points to remember
1. Hazards have potential
consequences
The risk is
Intolerable region
unacceptable
at any level
As The risk is
acceptable
Low based on
As Tolerable region mitigation.
Cost benefit
Reasonably analysis
Practicable is required.
Acceptable
region The risk is
acceptable as it
currently stands
Cost-benefit analysis
• Direct costs
– The obvious costs, which are easily
determined. The high costs of exposure of
hazards can be reduced by insurance coverage
• Purchasing insurance only transfers monetary risk,
does not address the safety hazard
• Indirect costs
– The uninsured costs. An understanding of
uninsured costs (or indirect costs) is
fundamental to understand the economics
of safety
Indirect costs
Loss of use of equipment
Loss of staff
• –Involved in accident issues
• –Lower productivity
• –Training for new hired
Investigation & clean-up
Legal claims
Fines and citations
Misplaced/stranded passengers
Negative media exposure
corrective action
increased insurance premiums
Risk cost
Event Direct cost Indirect cost
• Definition
–Probability – The likelihood
that an unsafe event or
condition might occur
Second fundamental – Risk probability
Extremely
Almost inconceivable that the event will occur 1
improbable
Third fundamental – Risk severity
• Definition
–Severity – The possible effects
of an unsafe event or condition,
taking as reference the worst
foreseeable situation
Third fundamental – Risk severity
• Define the severity in terms of effects for:
– Property
– Finance
– Liability
– People
– Environment
– Image
– Public confidence
Third fundamental – Risk severity
• Questions for assessing the severity of an
occurrence:
– How many lives may be lost?
• Employees
• Passengers
• General public
– What is the environmental impact?
• Spill of fuel or other hazardous product
• Physical disruption of natural habitat
Third fundamental – Risk severity
• … questions such as:
– What is the severity of the property or
financial damage?
• Direct operator property loss
• Damage to aviation infrastructure
• Third party damage
• Financial impact and economic impact for the State
– Are there organizational, management or
regulatory implications that might generate
larger threats to public well-being?
– What are the likely political implications
and/or media interest?
Third fundamental – Risk severity
Severity of occurrences
Aviation definition Meaning Value
Equipment destroyed.
Catastrophic Multiple deaths. A
A large reduction in safety margins, physical distress or a
workload such that the operators cannot be relied upon to
Hazardous perform their tasks accurately or completely. B
Serious injury.
Major equipment damage.
A significant reduction in safety margins, a reduction in the
ability of the operators to cope with adverse operating
conditions as a result of increase in workload, or as a result C
Major of conditions impairing their efficiency.
Serious incident.
Injury to persons.
Nuisance.
Minor Operating limitations.
Use of emergency procedures. D
Minor incident.
Negligible Little consequences E
Fourth fundamental – Risk index/tolerability
Fourth fundamental – Risk index/tolerability
Likelihood - IATA
Category Description
1 Frequently
2 Likely
3 Occasionally
4 Seldom
5 Rarely
161
IATA- Risk assessment
Risk severity
Risk Factor Assessment
Catastrophic Hazardous Major Minor Negligible
Risk
probability 5 4 3 2 1
5 – Frequent 25 20 15 10 5
4 – Occasional 20 16 12 8 4
3 – Remote 15 12 9 6 3
2 – Improbable 10 8 6 4 2
1 – Extremely
improbable
5 4 3 2 1
Consequence
Almost Certain
(A)
Significant Significant High High High
Likely
(B)
Medium Significant Significant High High
Possible
(C)
Low Medium Significant High High
Unlikely
(D)
Low Low Medium Significant High
Rare
(E)
Low Low Medium Significant Significant
Acceptable after
Between 8 & 4 review of the operation
– Training
– Regulations
Risk mitigation – Defences
• As part of the risk mitigation, determine:
– Do defences to protect against such risk (s)
exist?
– Do defences function as intended?
– Are the defences practical for use under actual
working conditions?
– Is staff involved aware of the risks and the
defences in place?
– Are additional risk mitigation measures required?
Risk mitigation at a glance
Hazard/consequence Assessment of the Control and Accepting the
identification defences within the mitigation of the mitigation of the
and risk assessment safety system risk(s) risk(s)
Take action
and continue YES Can the risk be eliminated? NO
the operation
Service
Will comply all applicable national and international standards.
provider
Basic safety management SARPs – Part III
State
(SSP)
Performance-based
Acceptance oversight
Compliance
oversight
Objective:
Services provider
Objective: Organization’s Support
Safety risk production
management Safety Service delivery goals and
Management customer
system (SMS) satisfaction
Safety assurance
In summary
State Service provider
Realistic
implementation
Safety
management
Performance
based
ICAO
Prescriptive SARPS
In summary
Prescription Performance
2.1 Safety requirements for service providers 2.2 Agreement on service providers’ safety
SMS performance
The State has agreed with individual service
The State has established the controls which providers on the safety performance of their
govern how service providers will identify SMS.
hazards and manage safety risks. 3.2 Safety data collection, analysis and
3.1 Safety oversight exchange
The State has established mechanisms to
The State has established mechanisms to ensure the capture and storage of data on
ensure an effective monitoring of the eight hazards and safety risks at both an individual
critical elements of the safety oversight and aggregate State’s level.
function. 3.3 Safety data driven targeting of oversight on
areas of greater concern or need
The State has established procedures to
prioritize inspections, audits and surveys
towards those areas of greater safety concern
or need, as identified by the analysis of data
on hazards, their consequences in operations,
and the assessed safety risks.
In summary
1. Maintain no more than 20 events of unauthorized vehicles on the taxiways per
Safety 10,000 operations.
performance
2. By January 2009 reduce to 8 FOD events on the apron per 10,000 operations.
targets
3. …
Service
Will comply all applicable national and international standards.
provider
ICAO SAFETY MANAGEMENT MANUAL
• Guidance on safety
management systems is
contained in the ICAO
Safety Management
Manual (Doc 9859).
• SUCAR Part 19, safety
management.
• National safety programme
(NSP).
SUCAR 19
– Safety Management
• SUCAR 19, of Sudan civil aviation sets the
standard and recommended practices for service
providers to develop a safety management system
in order to comply with ICAO requirement for
Sudan state.
• SMS established by the service providers shall
achieve an acceptable level of safety performance
(ALoSP) defined by the Sudan Civil Aviation
Authority.
SUCAR 19
– Safety Management
Operations Maintenance
safety officer safety officer
Safety Action
Safety Services
Group(s)
(SAG) Office
ICAO SMS framework
Safety policy and objectives
1.1 – Management commitment and responsibility
1.2 – Safety accountabilities
1.3 – Appointment of key safety personnel
1.4 – Coordination of emergency response planning
1.5 – SMS documentation
Safety risk management
2.1 – Hazard identification
2.2 – Risk assessment and mitigation
Safety assurance
3.1 – Safety performance monitoring and measurement
3.2 – The management of change
3.3 – Continuous improvement of the SMS
Safety promotion
4.1 – Training and education
4.2 – Safety communication
Safety policy and objectives
1.3 – Appointment of key safety personnel
Operations Maintenance
safety officer safety officer
Safety Action
Safety Services
Group(s)
(SAG) Office
Safety policy and objectives
1.3 – Appointment of key safety personnel
Operations Maintenance
safety officer safety officer
Safety Action
Safety Services
Group(s)
(SAG) Office
Safety policy and objectives
1.3 – Appointment of key safety personnel
• The Safety Review Board (SRB):
– High level committee
– Strategic safety functions
• Chaired by the accountable executive
• It may include the Board of Directors
Operations Maintenance
safety officer safety officer
Safety Action
Safety Services
Group(s)
(SAG) Office
Safety policy and objectives
1.3 – Appointment of key safety personnel
– Members
• Managers and supervisors from functional areas
• Front-line personnel
Safety policy and objectives
1.3 – Appointment of key safety personnel
• SAG:
– Oversees operational safety within the functional area.
– Resolves identified risks
– Assesses the impact on safety of operational changes.
– Implements corrective action plans
– Ensures that corrective action is taken in a timely
manner
– Review the effectiveness of previous safety
recommendations
– Safety promotion
ICAO SMS framework
Safety policy and objectives
1.1 – Management commitment and responsibility
1.2 – Safety accountabilities
1.3 – Appointment of key safety personnel
1.4 – Coordination of emergency response planning
1.5 – SMS documentation
Safety risk management
2.1 – Hazard identification
2.2 – Risk assessment and mitigation
Safety assurance
3.1 – Safety performance monitoring and measurement
3.2 – The management of change
3.3 – Continuous improvement of the SMS
Safety promotion
4.1 – Training and education
4.2 – Safety communication
Safety policy and objectives
1.4 – Coordination of emergency response planning
6. The SMSM
Questions
consequences of hazards in
operations to ALARP
ICAO SMS framework
Safety policy and objectives
1.1 – Management commitment and responsibility
1.2 – Safety accountabilities
1.3 – Appointment of key safety personnel
1.4 – Coordination of emergency response planning
1.5 – SMS documentation
Safety risk management
2.1 – Hazard identification
2.2 – Risk assessment and mitigation
Safety assurance
3.1 – Safety performance monitoring and measurement
3.2 – The management of change
3.3 – Continuous improvement of the SMS
Safety promotion
4.1 – Training and education
4.2 – Safety communication
Safety assurance
3.1 – Safety 1. Training course for drivers / installation of specific
signage.
performance Safety
requirements 2. Thrice-daily walk-in ramp inspection programme.
monitoring and 3. …
Safety performance
Hazard identification monitoring and Specific
measurement information
Safety Mgt. of
risks change Assessment
Safety
Effectiveness Efficiency
Aviation
community
stakeholders
Points to remember
1. Key ingredients for successful reporting
4. Safety communication
Questions
2. Identify the person (or planning group) within the Element 1.3
organization responsible for implementing the SMS (Module 8)
Element 4.1
2. Training relevant to proactive and predictive processes (Module 9)
Element 4.1
3. Training relevant to operational safety assurance
(Module 9)
Service
State
providers
SSP SMS
STATE SAFETY PROGRAMME (SSP)
• Requirement
– States shall establish a State safety
programme (SSP), in order to achieve an
acceptable level of safety in civil aviation.
State safety programme
• Implementation
– Develop the State safety programme (SSP)
around the following four components:
1. State safety policy and objectives
2. State safety risk management
3. State safety assurance
4. State safety promotion
ICAO SSP framework
1. State safety policy and objectives
1.1 State safety legislative framework
1.2 Safety responsibilities and accountabilities
1.3 Accident and incident investigation
1.4 Enforcement policy
2. State safety risk management
2.1 Safety requirements for service providers SMS
2.2 Agreement on service providers’ safety performance
3. State safety assurance
3.1 Safety oversight
3.2 Safety data collection, analysis and exchange
3.3 Safety data driven targeting of oversight on areas of greater concern or
need
4. State safety promotion
4.1 Internal training, communication and dissemination of safety information
4.2 External training, communication and dissemination of safety information
SSP initial steps in support of SMS implementation
STEP 1
Conduct a gap STEP 2
analysis of the
SSP, in order to Develop an STEP 3
ascertain the
SMS training
status of Develop SMS
maturity and programme for STEP 4
the State safety regulations for
existence within
oversight service Revise the
the State of the
elements of an authority staff. providers. State
SSP. Prepare enforcement
guidance policy.
material for the
implementation
of SMS.
SSP initial steps in support of SMS implementation
• The service providers’ SMS cannot effectively
perform either in a regulatory vacuum, or in an
exclusively compliance-oriented environment.
• In such environments, service providers will only
implement and demonstrate, and the State
authorities will only assess, the tokens of an
SMS
• In such environments, service providers will not be
able to implement, or the State authorities will be
not able to assess, effectively performing SMS
SSP initial steps in support of SMS implementation
Service
State
Safety
providers
ALoS performance
SSP SMS
A vision of the future – Integration
State safety programme (SSP) + Service providers SMS =
Integrated safety system (ISS)
Protection Production
Objective: State
Safety risk Safety
management
Programme
State
(SSP) Performance-based
Acceptance oversight
Compliance
oversight
Services provider
Organization’s Objective:
Objective: Support
Safety risk Safety production
management Service delivery
Management goals and
system (SMS) customer
satisfaction
Safety assurance
• Air Transat has a 72% decrease in irregular
operating costs (over $1m per month saved)
• Improved employee morale at Air Transat
• Benefits in reduced incidents and increased
awareness of operation
• Applies equally to other sectors of industry
Past/Current New
Prescriptive regulations Performance-based regulations
Focus on areas of greatest risk
Highly specialized and technically
trained staff System auditors and analysts