Peer Evaluation

POLS 2119

Instructor Michelle Coffin

Group Project Assignment

Topic:
Student Name: Harmanpreet Singh

Identify the team member being evaluated:

1.Akash birah(0283277)
2.Peace Ezeanyagu (0274422)
3.Anele Uloma (0290084)
4. Ahmed Adewale Adekoye (0284431)

1.AKASH BIRAH(0283277)

Peer Evaluation
Area of contribution #1: Research (research, gathering, evaluating and
citing information)
1 2 3 4 5 4.5/
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
5
Area of contribution #2: Analysis & synthesis (critical analysis of
problem/issues)
1 2 3 4 5 4.5/
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
5
Area of contribution #3: Creativity and innovation (ideas, effective
processes and synthesis)
1 2 3 4 5 5/5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
Area of contribution #4: Writing (organization of work, reviewing
members’ reports or sections, quality of writing)
1 2 3 4 5 4/5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
Area of contribution #5: Quality of individual contribution (providing
constructive and relevant feedback, contributing to preparation of the
project, attendance, actively participating in team meetings, assisting
team members, volunteering for tasks, asking early for assistance if
required) 5/5
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement

TOTAL: 23/2
5

2.Peace Ezeanyagu(0274422)

Peer Evaluation
Area of contribution #1: Research (research, gathering, evaluating and
citing information)
1 2 3 4 5 4.5/
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
5
Area of contribution #2: Analysis & synthesis (critical analysis of
problem/issues)
1 2 3 4 5 4.5/
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
5
Area of contribution #3: Creativity and innovation (ideas, effective
processes and synthesis)
1 2 3 4 5 5/5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
Area of contribution #4: Writing (organization of work, reviewing
members’ reports or sections, quality of writing)
1 2 3 4 5 4/5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
Area of contribution #5: Quality of individual contribution (providing
constructive and relevant feedback, contributing to preparation of the
project, attendance, actively participating in team meetings, assisting
team members, volunteering for tasks, asking early for assistance if
required) 5/5
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
 TOTAL: 23/2
5

3.Anele Uloma (0290084)

Peer Evaluation
Area of contribution #1: Research (research, gathering, evaluating and
citing information)
1 2 3 4 5 5/5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
Area of contribution #2: Analysis & synthesis (critical analysis of
problem/issues)
1 2 3 4 5 4.5/
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
5
Area of contribution #3: Creativity and innovation (ideas, effective
processes and synthesis)
1 2 3 4 5 5/5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
Area of contribution #4: Writing (organization of work, reviewing
members’ reports or sections, quality of writing)
1 2 3 4 5 3.5/
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
5
Area of contribution #5: Quality of individual contribution (providing
constructive and relevant feedback, contributing to preparation of the
project, attendance, actively participating in team meetings, assisting
team members, volunteering for tasks, asking early for assistance if
required) 5/5
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement

TOTAL: 23/2
5
4. Ahmed Adewale Adekoye (0284431)

Peer Evaluation
Area of contribution #1: Research (research, gathering, evaluating and
citing information)
1 2 3 4 5 4.5/
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
5
Area of contribution #2: Analysis & synthesis (critical analysis of
problem/issues)
1 2 3 4 5 4.5/
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
5
Area of contribution #3: Creativity and innovation (ideas, effective
processes and synthesis)
1 2 3 4 5 5/5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
Area of contribution #4: Writing (organization of work, reviewing
members’ reports or sections, quality of writing)
1 2 3 4 5 5/5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
Area of contribution #5: Quality of individual contribution (providing
constructive and relevant feedback, contributing to preparation of the
project, attendance, actively participating in team meetings, assisting
team members, volunteering for tasks, asking early for assistance if
required) 5/5
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement

TOTAL: 24/2
5