Lecture 6 Orderings Sep 19
Lecture 6 Orderings Sep 19
Examples. The relations “has the same hair color as” or “is the same age as” in the set of
people are equivalence relations. The equivalence classes under the relation “has the
same hair color as” are the set of blond people, the set of red-haired people, etc.
Partitions. Given a non-empty set A, a partition of A is a collection of non-empty subsets
of A such that (1) for any two distinct subsets X and Y, X ∩Y = ∅ and (2) the union of all
the subsets in collection equals A. The subsets of A that are members of a partition of A
are called cells of that partition.
There is a close correspondence between partitions and equivalence relations.
Given a partition of set A, the relation R = {<x,y> x and y are in the same cell of the
partition of A} is an equivalence relation in A. Conversely, given an equivalence relation
R in A, there exists a partition of A in which x and y are in the same cell iff <x,y> ∈ R..
Example. Consider the following set Countries = {Germany, England, India, China,
USA, Canada}. One possible partition on Countries is one that classifies them according
to the continents they are in. We get the following partition PC: {{Germany, England},
{India, China}, {USA, Canada}}. (Note that a partition is always a set of sets.)
3.5. Orderings.
An order is a binary relation which is transitive and in addition either (i) reflexive and
antisymmetric or else (ii) irreflexive and asymmetric. The former are weak orders; the
latter are strict (or strong). [This is where the property “antisymmetric” becomes
important.]
Examples: (There are more on pp. 48-49 in the book.)
Ling 409: Partee lecture notes, Lecture 6
September 19, 2005 p. 2
Some terminology: if R is an order, either weak or strict, and <x,y> ∈ R, we say that x
precedes y, x is a predecessor of y, y succeeds (or follows) x, or y is a successor of x. If x
precedes y and x ≠ y , then we say that x immediately precedes y if and only if there is no
element z distinct from both x and y such that x precedes z and z precedes y. In other
words, there is no other element between x and y in the order. Immediate predecessor
diagrams. See pp 49-50; we’ll illustrate on the board.
There is also a useful set of terms for elements which stand at the extremes of an
order. Given an order R in a set A,
1) an element x in A is minimal iff there is no other element in A which precedes x
2) an element x in A is least iff x precedes every other element in A
3) an element x in A is maximal iff there is no other element in A which follows x
4) an element x in A is greatest iff x follows every other element in A.
Note that greatest (least) element is maximal (minimal) but the opposite is not always the
case.
If an order, strict or weak, is also connected, then it is said to be a total or
linear order. Often orders in general are called partial orders or partially ordered sets.
This terminology has the unfortunate consequence that a partial order may be total; we
then often say “only a partial order” when we mean a partial order that is NOT total.
A relation R in A is dense if for every <x,y> ∈ R such that x ≠ y, there exists a
member z ∈ A distinct from both x and y such that <x,z> ∈ R and <z,y> ∈ R. The relation
‘is greater than’ is not dense on the natural numbers but is dense on the real numbers.
Examples. Relations ≥ and = on the set N of natural numbers are examples of weak
order, as are relations ⊇ and = on subsets of any set. The relations > and ⊃ are examples
of strict orders on the corresponding sets. The relations ≥ and > are linear orders. The
relations ⊇ and ⊃ are partial orders that are not linear orders.