Lecture On Supply Capacitated Location Model
Lecture On Supply Capacitated Location Model
Analysis
2
Recap - Demand Allocation Model
n m
• Which market is served
Min cij xij
by which plant? i =1 j =1
• Which supply sources are s.t.
used by a plant?
n
xij = volume shipped from
supply site i to customer j
x
i =1
ij
= D j , j = 1,..., m
m
• Assumption
x
j =1
ij
K i , i = 1,..., n
– Supply chain is in steady
state operation x ij
0
• Supply locations are fixed and
known
• Demand locations are known
3
Supply Chain Design – Blank Page
Tier 1
Suppliers
Manufacturing
Distribution
Centres
Customers
5
Supply Chain Re-Design
6
What questions should a supply chain manager be asking now?
Demand Allocation Model Formulation
n m
Min cij xij • Demand Allocation Model
i =1 j =1 assumes every facility is
open
s.t.
n
• How to modify the model to
x
i =1
ij
= D j , j = 1,..., m capture open or closed
scenarios?
m
x
j =1
ij
K i , i = 1,..., n
x ij
0
7
Capacitated Facility Location Model
• Decision variables
– Is factory i open or not
– If factory i is open, shipment quantities from i to j
• Parameters
– Demand at j, capacity at i, shipping cost between i and j,
fixed cost at i
• Objective function
– Minimise total costs (fixed + variable)
• Constraints
• Can only ship from an open factory
• Sum of shipments from open i cannot exceed its capacity Ki
n n m
• Minimise
Min f y + c x ij ij – Fixed cost + variable
i i
i =1 i =1 j =1 cost
s.t.
n
x = D
i =1
ij j
j = 1,..., m • Customer demand is met
x K y
j =1
ij i i
i = 1,..., n • Volume shipped from an
open plant cannot exceed
its capacity
y {0,1},
i
i = 1,...n, xij 0 • yi is binary (0 or 1)
• xij are non-negative
9
Capacitated Facility Location Model
Manufacturing
Distribution
Centres
11
Capacitated Facility Location Model
Manufacturing
Distribution
Centres
Manufacturing
Distribution
Centres
14
1.6.1 Problem
1 2 3
Facility
Customer
1 2 3 4 5
15
16
1.6.1 Solution
2 3
Facility
Customer
1 2 3 4 5
17
1.6.2 SunOil Problem (Ch 5 Chopra & Meindl)
SunOil is a manufacturer of petrochemical products with world wide sales.
You are the VP of supply chain and have several options available. One
possibility is to set up a facility in each region. Advantage is lower
transportation costs and import duties from other regions. Disadvantage is
plants only produce for local demand and may not exploit economies of
scale. Alternative is to consolidate plants in a few regions to improve
economies of scale but increase transportation and import duties. Other
non-quantifiable trade-offs include competitive environment and political
risk.
The table on next slide provides:
• Annual demand per region
• Variable production, inventory, transportation, duties costs of producing
in one region and meeting demand in other regions.
• Fixed costs incurred independent of volume.
• Variable costs linked to volume produced/shipped.
SunOil is considering two facility sizes, low capacity plants which produce
10,000,000 per year and high capacity producing 20,000,000 per year. High
capacity plants exhibit some economies of scale with fixed costs less than
double those of low capacity plants. What network design should the supply 18
chain VP pursue?
1.6.2 SunOil Problem
19
1.6.2 SunOil Problem
20
1.6.2 SunOil Problem
North South Europe Africa
Asia
America America
North South
Europe Asia Africa
America America 21
K = 20 K = 20 K = 20 K = 20 K = 20
K = 10 K = 10 K = 10 K = 10 K = 10
K = 20 K = 20 K = 20 K = 20 K = 20
K = 10 K = 10 K = 10 K = 10 K = 10
Solution
24
1.6.2 SunOil Solution
25
1.6.2 SunOil Solution
K = 20 K = 20 K = 20
xi=1
ij D j for j = 1,K ,m
J. David Allen, Roger L. Tobin, Anthony Calderan (2017) Verizon Optimizes Work Center Locations to Reduce Installation and
Repair Operations Costs. Interfaces, Published online in Articles in Advance 10 Mar 2017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.2016.0871
Value of Supply Chain Optimisation –
Pfizer & Wyeth
The global job cuts comes in the wake of last year's purchase of rival
Wyeth. Pfizer had 40 manufacturing sites before acquiring more than three
30
dozen Wyeth facilities in the October merger.
Value of Supply Chain Optimisation:
Merger and Acquisitions─Miller and Coors, then
SABMiller & InBev (2016)
31
Session Summary
32