POS 105 Nigeria Constitutional Development
POS 105 Nigeria Constitutional Development
POS 105
Course Code: POS 105
Course title: Nigeria constitutional Development
Course Lecturer: Mr. Victor Obadiah
INTRODUCTION
The course POS 105 critically examines issues that pertains to the historical evolution of
Nigeria constitution In this course, we will also engage in an analysis of issues and problem
in Nigeria constitutional Development from amalgamation in 1914 through colonial rule, the
military era to the present in addition we will also have an assessment of the impact of
socio-cultural and economic force as well as others dynamics that informs constitutional
amendment or change over the tribal phases of constitution in Nigeria.
There would be emphasis on issues and contentious provisions of the different constitution
that eventually Necessitated change .
CONSTITUTION
The concepts of a constitution generally speaking, a constitution is a statement that outlines
the agreed basic principles of formal organization, ranging from national government to
private Clubs it is the basic set of laws by which the people are governed thus, constitution
of the state is body of rules and regulations which determined how a state is governed.
A constitution defines and establishes the principles of the organs of government, it defines
the structure and functions of each organ of government and sets limits within which such
functions are to be exercised, it spells out the interrelationship among the organs. The
constitution declares the principles, which regulate the operation of these organs and define
the bonds between the citizens and the state; thus, the condition for the exercise of
legitimate power, how it should be exercised and the limit of these powers are enshrined in a
constitution. It is therefore, inconsiderable for a state to exist without a constitution (written or
unwritten) defining the relationship between the governor and the governed. The constitution
of a state embodies the fundamentals of the political system. Basically the constitution
ought to be the supreme law of the political blueprints of the political systems made by the
people for the proper regulations and the control of society, as well as the correct and orderly
behavior of the people in such system but the success of any constitution depends on the
foundation on which such a constitution rest.
This is so because a constitution does not command immediate respect, complies and
obedience. For instance, people are likely to be withhold their support and respect for a
constitution if they feel that their aspirations and interest are not well protected by the
constitution since a constitution is a political documents it is therefore expected to cover and
respectively reflect the dominant political disposition in the political systems fair cure of
which may generate Fair distrust, frustration and alienation and may cultivate in aggression.
Thus whose goal and aspirations are blocked and frustrated by the system are usually
aggressive in nature and would eventually employ other Constitutional means to register
their preference and this could result in general constitutional inability.
FEATURES OF A CONSTITUTION
1. Fundamental Laws: Constitution are laws abundant the political procedures to be
followed in the making laws they are supreme laws, taken precedence over others
and defining how other law should be made
2. Entrenched status: Constitution has a special legal status unlike other laws. The
constitution usually states the condition under which the constitution by itself be
changed.
3. Codified documents: Constitutions are written down often in written (single)
documents that present the constitution in a systematic manner.
4. Allocation of power: Constitution outlines the proper relation between institution and
office of the state .
PRINCIPLES OF A CONSTITUTION
1. Rules of Law: According to Albert V. Dicey (1835-1922) The rule of law underlines
the idea of the constitution.
2. Transfer of power: Democracies are marked by a peaceful transfer of power from one
set of leaders or parties to another. Democratic constitutions typically state the
conditions for this – how and when government is to be elected, by whom and for
how long. The peaceful transfer of power is so important that some political scientists
define a ‘democracy’ in these terms – e.g. there have been three successive free and
peaceful elections.
3. Separation of powers and checks and balances: According to classical political
theory,democracy is best protected by creating separate branches of government
with different functions and powers, each checking and balancing the power of the
others in a system of checks and balances.
4. Relations between government and citizens: At the heart of any democracy is the
relationship between citizens and their government, so constitutions often include (or
refer to) a Bill of Rights that enumerates the rights and responsibilities of citizens,
and the limits of government power over them. Those who are suspicious of
government in any shape or form see constitutions as setting clear limits on the
power of government in order to guarantee the rights of the citizens.
5. Locus of sovereignty: Since there must be a governing body or office capable of
making authoritative decisions, constitutions usually specify who or what is to be the
ultimate authority to make and enforce law.
6. Government accountability: Democratic governments are accountable to their
citizens, and constitutions normally try to pin down the mechanisms of this
accountability – who is answerable to whom, and under what circumstances
7. Final arbiter: Constitutions are sometimes disputed because none is fully clear,
consistent, unambiguous, or comprehensive. The last job of a constitution is to say
who is to be the final arbiter of its meaning and how it may be changed. It is easy to
obtain the constitution of every nation in the world from websites, so no examples are
provided here. In spite of their huge variety, most constitutions fall into four main
parts
Preamble • The preamble tends to be a declaration about nationhood and history, with
references to important national events, symbols and aspirations. The preamble tends to be
inspirational rather than legal or rational.
Fundamental rights (Bill of Rights) • A list of civil and political rights and statements about
the limits of government powers. Some constitutions refer also to economic, social and
cultural rights. Many of the newer constitutions simply adopt the 1948 UN Universal
Declaration of Human Rights.
Institutions and offices of government • The main structures or institutions of government
are described, together with their powers and duties. Usually this means the executive,
legislative and judicial branches of national government, and sometimes lower levels of
government as well.
Amendment • The procedures to be followed in amending the constitution.
SOURCES OF CONSTITUTION
1. Acts of parliament
2. Customs and conventions
3. International documents
4. Judicial precedents
5. Constitutional conferences
IMPERATIVE/IMPORTANCE OF A CONSTITUTION
1. A constitution spelt out the organs of government and the duties allocated to them
2. A constitution provides the framework for the adequate understanding of the dynamics,
form and character of a particular system of government in operation
3. A constitution serves as the foundation on which the building of a government rest its foot.
4. A constitution enables the citizens to be conscious of their rights and duties because they
are clearly spelt out in the constitution
5. A constitution helps to sanitize the political environment for matured conduct of political
activities.
6. It provides rules and regulations for human conduct in a society.
2. Head of State:This was Governor Hugh Clifford, representing the Queen of England.
a). Sectionalism-The Clifford Constitution of 1922 brought sectionalism into Nigeria as the
constitution was meant for the Southern protectorate alone. The
Legislative council was also created for the south excluding the North.
d). Imposition–The people claimed that the constitution was imposed on them
e). The Governor-General had veto powers on issues discussed in the legislative and
executive council
1. Regional Imbalance: Created regional disparities, as the North had more representatives
than the other regions.
2. Limited Nigerian Representation: Nigerians still had limited representation in the central
government.
LYTTLETON 1954
The Lyttleton Constitution of 1954 The Lyttleton Constitution of 1954 was the first
constitution in Nigeria that was not named after a colonial Governor of Nigeria, but someone
outside of Nigeria.
It was named after Mr. Lyttelton, who chaired the 1953 London and 1954 Lagos
Constitutional Conferences, which produced the constitution and also because of his
immense contributions in terms of ideas and given his position as the overseer of the affairs
of all colonial
territories.
The constitution introduced “true federalism” in Nigeria. Each of the regions was granted
greater autonomy and independence from central control. Directives were no longer to flow
from the central legislature to the regional legislatures. The federal government was given
exclusive powers, the regions were given residual powers, the concurrent legislative list
contained items upon which both the central and regional government can deliberate on; but
in case of conflict on concurrent power, the federal laws prevailed over the regional laws.
The
failure to break the Northern part of the country and create more regions did not sit well the
minority aspiration because this was inconsistent with a federal government to have one
component unit of the federation (the North) larger in size and representation than the other
components combined.
The absence of a second legislative chamber at the center crippled the
efficacy of the constitution. In line with the principles of federalism, the second chamber was
imperative to balance the minority interest; moreover, the northern part of the country with
the highest population claimed more seats in the single legislature at the expense of the
minority.
This imbalance tended to result in ethnicity, wrangling and parochialism (Udokang, 2006). As
can be seen from the discourse, constitutional development in Nigeria during the colonial
period witnessed at early stages the Governor’s Constitution which were imposed by the
British government on the Nigerian people, and then the gradual and progressive relaxation
of imperial control in Nigeria through later constitutions which attempted to get Nigerians
involved in the administration of their country.
The fact, however, remains that Nigerians had very little experience in the art of
self-government as they were not really brought into the mainstream of political
administration until much later. The British government therefore created and left
behind a political class whose horizon did not extend beyond acquiring political power and
fighting tooth and nail to preserve it without any meaningful coherent policy for its exercise
(Ayua, 1985).
1957 MODIFICATIONS
A constitutional conference was held in 1957 to make some amendments to the 1954
Lyttleton constitution.
The central legislature became bicameral in 1959 with the house of representatives
consisting of 320 members and the senate 52 members
A premier was appointed for southern Cameroon.
The year 1960 was fixed for independence
The House of Representatives, which was elected in December 1959 at its first meeting held
in
January 1960, passed a resolution requesting Her Majesty’s Government to introduce
necessary legislation to enable Nigeria become an independent sovereign state with effect
from 1st of October 1960. This resolution was endorsed by the Senate.
The Independence Act was accordingly passed by both Houses of British Parliament in July
1960 and received the Royal Assent on the 29th of July of the same year. Nigeria therefore
attained independence and became a member of the Commonwealth on the 1st of October
1960. The relationship between Nigeria and the British government was thus redefined by
the 1960 Constitution. The powers of the British Parliament to legislate for Nigeria were
terminated and the responsibility of the British government for the administration of Nigeria
also ceased (Ayua, 1985). Ayua (1985) notes further that the 1960 constitution emanated
from Britain with the stamp of Westminster even though its framework was decided upon by
the Nigerians themselves. Apart from this, the independence constitution did not bring about
radical and complete severance or
break from Britain. Thus, the Queen of England was still Queen of Nigeria and internally, the
government was still “Her Majesty’s Government”. The constitution provided various ways in
which the sovereignty of independent Nigeria, which was formally vested in the Queen,
should be exercised. Nigeria’s sovereignty was divided between three Regional
governments and the Federal government. Because the Queen was an absent sovereign,
she was represented in Nigeria
by a Governor-General at the center and by Governors at the Regions. The Queen was
responsible for law making in Nigeria with the various legislative houses acting in
conjunction.Her role was to assent to bills passed by the legislative houses. Her assent
therefore had the effect of transforming a bill into binding laws. The constitution provided for
bi-cameral legislature at the center, the Senate and House of Representatives. Each region
was to have a House of Assembly and a House of Chiefs. Legislative powers were divided
between the federal and regional governments. The federal government had exclusive
powers to legislate on certain
matters (44 items in all), such as external affairs, defense, deportation, extradition, police,
exchange control, passports and visas, railways, currency, coinage and legal tender, etc.
The other list contained concurrent issues that could be legislated upon by both the federal
and
regional governments. It also provided for the first time, a list of fundamental human rights
and
the recognition of the worth of human beings. This was in accordance with the models laid
down in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the 1950 European
Convention on Human Rights. These rights included freedom of expression, freedom of
conscience, freedom of movement etc. It also made provision for and defined citizenship of
Nigeria (Udokang, 2006). The independence constitution gave the Supreme Court the power
of judicial review, i.e., it empowered the Supreme Court to declare any act of the executive,
the federal and regional governments that contradicted the constitution as null and void and
of no effect. However, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London was still the
highest court of appeal. The
constitution provided for a state of emergency; it granted the federal (legislature) government
power over emergency situations to be exercised by 2/3 majority of the members of the
parliament. Meanwhile, the constitution was rigid and fashioned after the British
parliamentary system (Udokang, 2006). As observed, the constitution affected Nigeria’s
sovereignty with colonial dictatorship because the Queen of England remained the head of
the Nigerian government and as such wielded enormous power, sufficient to dictate the pace
of political development in the country. The role of the Queen made it impossible for
Nigerians to pursue, without interference, its economic, political and constitutional matters.
The dissatisfaction engendered by this incompatible and eroding situation influenced the
process which led to the constitutional reforms in 1963 (Akpan, 2008).
Western Region: Dominated by the Action Group (AG), led by Chief Obafemi Awolowo. The
Western Region was one of Nigeria’s three main regions, alongside the Northern and
Eastern
regions. It was predominantly Yoruba and politically active.
Eastern Region: Dominated by the National Council of Nigeria and the Cameroons
(NCNC), led by Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe. The Eastern Region was predominantly inhabited by
the Igbo
ethnic group and was politically dominated by the National Council of Nigeria and the
Cameroons (NCNC), led by Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe. The NCNC had a stronghold in the Eastern
Region and was a key player in the broader coalition politics of Nigeria.
The Crisis
2. Electoral Malpractices:
- The elections were marred by widespread allegations of electoral fraud, including
voter intimidation, ballot box stuffing, and manipulation of voter rolls.
- In several regions, particularly the Northern and Western regions, there were reports
of government officials using their influence to ensure victory for the NNA, leading to
accusations of rigging and undemocratic practices by the ruling NPC.
Consequences
- The disputed election results led to a crisis of legitimacy for the newly formed
government. Many Nigerians and international observers questioned the fairness and
validity of the election process.
- The crisis strained the relationship between the federal government and the regions,
particularly the Western region, where political tensions were already high.
- The political instability and lack of trust in the electoral process contributed to the
eventual military coup in January 1966. The coup, led by Major General Johnson
Aguiyi-Ironsi, marked the beginning of military rule in Nigeria, which lasted for several
years.
- The political turbulence also set the stage for further regional and ethnic conflicts,
culminating in the Nigerian Civil War (1967-1970).
-
Impact on Democratic Development:
- The 1964 election crisis highlighted the challenges of building a democratic system in
a country with deep-seated ethnic and regional divisions.
- It underscored the need for electoral reforms and mechanisms to ensure free, fair,
and transparent elections in Nigeria.
Conclusion
The 1964 general election crisis was a pivotal moment in Nigerian history, demonstrating the
fragility of the country's nascent democracy and the profound impact of regional and ethnic
politics on national stability.
The 1964 general election crisis in the Northern Region was a critical event that revealed the
vulnerabilities of Nigeria's political system and set the stage for future conflicts and military
interventions. general election crisis in the Western Region was a significant event that
highlighted the deep political, ethnic, and regional divisions in Nigeria, setting the stage for
future conflicts and military interventions. THE crisis in the Eastern Region was event that
highlighted the deep political, ethnic, and regional divisions in Nigeria, setting the stage for
future conflicts and military interventions.
@Just Obey