ML PROJECT REPORT

ON

“Foreign College Admission Prediction ”

SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS

OF DEGREE OF
BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING
BY

Furkan Mustafa (41)

SUPERVISOR

Mr. Rahul Kapse

DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER ENGINEERING

PILLAI HOC COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY,

PILLAI HOCL EDUCATIONAL CAMPUS, HOCL COLONY,
RASAYANI, TAL: KHALAPUR, DIST: RAIGAD, 410207
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI

[2024-25]
 Mahatma Education Society’s

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology,

Rasayani-410207

2024-25

Certificate
This is to certify that the ML Project Report entitled “ Foreign College
Admission Prediction” is a bonafide work of Furkan Mustafa(41)
submitted to the University of Mumbai in partial fulfillment of the
requirement for the award of the degree of “Undergraduate” in “Computer
Engineering”.

Mr.Rahul Kapse

(Supervisor)
 Declaration
I declare that this written submission represents my ideas in my own
words and where others ideas or words have been included. I have
adequately cited and referenced the original sources. I also declare that I
have adhered to all principles of academic honesty and integrity have
not misrepresented or fabricated or falsified any idea/data/fact/source in
our submission. I understand that any violation of the above will
because for disciplinary action by the Institute and can also evoke penal
action from the sources which have thus not been properly cited or from
whom proper permission has not been taken when needed.

Furkan
Mustafa

Date:
S

Abstract

The Foreign College Admission Prediction system utilizes machine learning

models to predict a student’s chances of being admitted to a foreign institution.
The system is built to process student profiles, including their academic
achievements, test scores, and extracurricular activities. It leverages advanced
regression models to provide accurate admission predictions. The system aids
students and counselors by offering insights based on historical data to enhance
decision-making.

Keywords: Foreign College Admission, Machine Learning, Regression, Student

Profiles, Admission Prediction.
Figure No. Figure Name Page No.

Fig 4.2.1 Block Diagram 19

Fig 4.2.2 Flow Diagram 20

Fig 4.2.3 Use Case Diagram 21

 Table of Contents

Content Page No.

Abstract i

List of Figures ii

Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Background 3
1.3 Motivation 5

Chapter 2: Literature Survey 7

2.1 Basic Terminologies 8
2.2 Existing System 10
2.3 Problem Statement 13

Chapter 3: Requirement Gathering 14

3.1 Software and Hardware Requirements 15

Chapter 4: Plan of Project 16

4.1 Method of Work 17

4.2 Proposed System Architecture

19

Chapter 5: Conclusion 22

References 24
 Chapter 1
Introduction
1.1 Introduction

Foreign college admission prediction using machine learning is an

emerging field that helps students and institutions streamline the
admissions process. This system is designed to predict the likelihood of a
student being admitted to foreign colleges based on key features such as
academic performance, standardized test scores, extracurricular activities,
and more. By leveraging data from past admissions, the system offers a
data-driven approach to decision-making for both students and admission
officers.

Key Components of the Admission Prediction System:

1. Input Data:
The system collects data from student profiles, including academic history
(SGPA), standardized test scores (GRE, TOEFL, etc.), work experience,
extracurricular activities, and other relevant metrics.

2. Preprocessing Module:
Data preprocessing is crucial for cleaning the input data, handling missing
values, normalizing features, and encoding categorical variables like gender
or nationality. This ensures that the data is in the correct format for the
machine learning models.

3. Feature Selection and Extraction:

Important features are selected that most affect the chances of admission.
These could include GPA, test scores, and other factors such as work
experience or recommendation letters. Feature extraction helps transform
raw data into numerical values that can be used in the predictive models.
Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

1
4. Machine Learning Model:
A variety of machine learning algorithms such as Linear Regression,
Random Forest, and Neural Networks are trained on historical data to
predict admission chances. These models are evaluated using various
metrics to ensure they are accurate and reliable.

5. Prediction Output:
Once the input data is processed, the machine learning model provides a
probability score indicating the likelihood of admission to the target
institution. This score can be used by students to assess their chances and
plan their applications accordingly.

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

2
1.2 Background

With the growing demand for higher education in foreign institutions, students
from around the world are competing for limited seats in prestigious
universities. Admission officers rely on a variety of factors to make their
decisions, but as the number of applicants grows, manual evaluation
becomes inefficient. To address this challenge, machine learning offers a
scalable, data-driven solution that can automate and optimize the admission
prediction process.

Key Points in Background:

1. Globalization of Higher Education:

As more students seek education abroad, there is a growing need to
efficiently manage and evaluate large volumes of applications from diverse
backgrounds.

2. Data-Driven Decision Making:

Traditional methods of reviewing applications rely heavily on subjective
evaluations, which may lead to inconsistencies. Machine learning models
can provide objective, data-driven insights, reducing the likelihood of bias
and improving the fairness of the admission process.

3. Challenges in Admission Prediction:

Predicting admissions is a complex task due to the variety of factors
involved, including both quantitative (GPA, test scores) and qualitative
aspects (essays, recommendations). While models are effective at handling
quantitative data, qualitative aspects can still pose a challenge.

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

3
4. Advances in Machine Learning and Predictive Analytics:
Machine learning techniques like regression, decision trees, and neural
networks have shown promising results in classification tasks, making them
well-suited for admission prediction. These models can analyze historical
data and identify trends, improving accuracy and efficiency.

5. Improving Institutional Decision-Making:

By using predictive models, universities can better understand the
likelihood of a student succeeding based on their profile. This allows
institutions to optimize their admission processes and make data-backed
decisions.

6. Scaling for Large Volumes of Applications:

As top universities receive thousands of applications every year, machine
learning models offer the scalability needed to quickly process and predict
admission outcomes for a large number of applicants.

1.3 Motivation

The rising number of students applying to foreign universities and the

complexity of the admission process motivates the development of a system
that can provide predictive insights to ease decision-making for both
students and institutions.

1. Global Competition in Higher Education:

As more students apply for limited seats at foreign universities, there is a
growing need for tools that can help students target their applications more

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

4
 strategically. A prediction system can provide insights into where a student
has the highest chances of admission

2. Assisting Students in Decision-Making:

Applying to colleges abroad can be an overwhelming process. A machine
learning-based prediction system can help students prioritize their
applications and focus on universities where they are more likely to be
accepted based on their profile.

3. Streamlining the Admissions Process:

For institutions, evaluating large volumes of applications can be time-
consuming. By automating the initial prediction of admission likelihood,
universities can reduce the manual workload of admission officers and
focus on evaluating borderline cases or exceptional candidates.

4. Improving Accuracy in Predictions:

Machine learning models trained on historical data can identify patterns in
past admissions that are not immediately apparent through manual review.
This improves the accuracy of predictions, helping both students and
universities make better decisions.

5. Preparing for the Future of Education:

As the use of AI and machine learning in education continues to grow,
developing advanced tools for tasks like admission prediction aligns with
the broader trend of using technology to enhance education systems
globally.

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

5
 Chapter 2
Literature Survey

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

6
2.1 Basic Terminologies:

1. Machine Learning (ML):

A field of AI that enables computers to learn patterns from data and make
predictions or decisions without explicit programming.
2. Regression:
A type of supervised learning used to predict a continuous outcome based
on input data (e.g., predicting admission probability).

3. Classification:
A machine learning task that assigns data to predefined categories (e.g.,
admitted or not admitted).

4. Training Data:
Historical data used to teach the machine learning model by showing input
features and known outcomes.

5. Test Data:
A dataset used to evaluate the performance of the trained model on unseen
data.

6. Feature Engineering:
The process of selecting and transforming variables (features) from raw
data to improve model performance.

7. Data Preprocessing:
Cleaning and preparing raw data for the model by handling missing values,
normalizing data, and encoding categorical features.

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

7
 8. Cross-Validation:
A technique used to assess model performance by dividing the data into
multiple training and testing sets to ensure accuracy.

2.2 Existing System:

Several systems and platforms currently utilize machine learning models to

predict college admissions, particularly for foreign institutions. These systems
often rely on historical data such as academic scores, standardized test results,
extracurricular activities, and more. Some of the popular existing systems are:

1. GradCafe Predictor: GradCafe is a platform that collects and shares admission

results from applicants across various fields of study. Its prediction tool uses historical
data from users to provide applicants with an estimate of their chances of being admitted
to specific programs based on their profile. The system primarily focuses on user-
generated data and provides rough estimates, but its accuracy is limited due to the
variability in data and the absence of machine learning techniques for deep analysis.

2. Admit Predictor: Admit Predictor is another widely used tool that leverages past
admission data to predict outcomes. It incorporates regression-based machine learning
models to estimate the probability of admission based on factors like GPA, GRE scores,
and TOEFL results. While the tool is useful for students to gauge their chances, it often
lacks detailed institution-specific insights, limiting its effectiveness in certain cases.

3. CollegeVine: CollegeVine offers a more personalized prediction model by using

advanced machine learning algorithms to assess a student's chances of admission based
on a variety of factors, including extracurricular involvement, essay quality, and
personal background. Their models incorporate both quantitative (test scores, GPA) and
qualitative (essays, recommendations) aspects of an application, providing more

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

8
 accurate predictions. However, their system focuses mainly on U.S. colleges and
universities, limiting its scope for predicting admission to foreign institutions.

Limitations of Existing Systems:

1. Accuracy Variations: Most existing systems are limited by the quality and
amount of data available. Without comprehensive, institution-specific datasets, their
predictions can lack accuracy, especially for lesser-known schools or programs.
2. Lack of Qualitative Analysis: While some platforms like CollegeVine
consider qualitative factors such as essays and recommendations, many tools are
overly reliant on quantitative data (GPA, test scores). This leaves out important
aspects of the application process, leading to incomplete predictions.
3. Generalization Issues: Many models are trained on data from a limited set of
universities, which can cause them to generalize poorly to new or foreign institutions
with unique admission policies.
4. Inconsistent Data: User-reported data on platforms like GradCafe can be
unreliable, affecting the accuracy of the predictions.
5. Low-Resource Institutions: Predictive tools often struggle with institutions
that don’t receive a high volume of applications, as the data needed to train models
effectively is scarce for these schools.

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

9
2.3 Problem Statement:

Despite the advancements in language identification technologies, significant

challenges remain in achieving high accuracy across a wide range of
languages, especially low-resource ones. Current systems may struggle
with multilingual documents, dialect variations, and the identification of
rare languages due to limited training data and model generalization issues.

Therefore, the need for a more advanced and accurate Language

Identification System is crucial. The system must effectively handle a
large number of languages, including dialects and scripts, and offer high
performance across multilingual and noisy text data. Moreover, it must be
scalable and adaptable to new languages as more data becomes available,
ensuring robust multilingual support in real-time applications.

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

10
Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

11
Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

12
 Chapter 3

Requirement Gathering

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

13
 3.1 Software and Hardware Requirements:

Software Requirements:

 Programming Language: Python

 Libraries: scikit-learn, fastText, TensorFlow

 IDE: PyCharm or Jupyter Notebook

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

14
Hardware Requirements

 Processor: Multi-core (Intel i5 or equivalent).

 RAM: Minimum 8 GB (16 GB recommended).

 Storage: Minimum 256 GB SSD.

 GPU: Dedicated GPU (e.g., NVIDIA GeForce) for deep learning tasks.

 Internet Connection: Stable connection for accessing datasets and

libraries.

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

15
Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

16
 Chapter 4

Plan of Project

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

17
4.1 Method of Work:

 Needs Assessment:

Conduct surveys and interviews with healthcare professionals and potential

users to identify key functionalities, pain points, and requirements for the
chatbot.

 Research and Data Collection:

Gather a comprehensive dataset of medical knowledge, including symptoms,

diseases, treatments, and patient interactions, ensuring data quality and
relevance.

 Technology Selection:

Choose appropriate AI and NLP frameworks (e.g., TensorFlow, PyTorch,

Rasa) for developing the chatbot, along with tools for speech recognition
and language understanding.

 Chatbot Design:

Develop a user-friendly interface, focusing on intuitive navigation and

engagement. Design conversational flows that facilitate easy interaction
and understanding.

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

18
 Model Development:

Train machine learning models using the collected data, focusing on natural
language understanding (NLU), intent recognition, and entity extraction to
improve the chatbot’s ability to comprehend user queries.

 Integration with Healthcare Systems:

Ensure seamless integration with existing healthcare systems, such as

electronic health records (EHRs), to provide personalized support and
accurate medical advice.

 Testing and Validation:

Conduct rigorous testing using real-world scenarios to evaluate the chatbot’s

accuracy, reliability, and user experience. Gather feedback from healthcare
professionals and users to identify areas for improvement.

4.2 Proposed System Architecture:

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

19
 Fig 4.2.1 Block Diagram

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

20
 Fig 4.2.2 Flow Diagram

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

21
Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

22
 Fig. 4.2.3 Use Case Diagram

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

23
Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

24
 Chapter 5

Conclusion

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

25
 Conclusion

In conclusion, the Language Identification System offers a robust solution for

automatically detecting languages from textual input, leveraging advanced
machine learning techniques. By integrating various models, such as Naive
Bayes and deep learning algorithms, the system ensures high accuracy and
efficiency in processing multilingual content. The project's design

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

26
 prioritizes real-time performance, making it suitable for applications in
diverse fields such as customer support, translation services, and content
moderation. Addressing challenges related to low-resource languages and
mixed-language inputs remains essential for enhancing the system's
reliability. Future developments may focus on expanding language support
and refining algorithms for even better performance. Ultimately, this
system contributes to bridging communication gaps in our increasingly
globalized world.

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

27
Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

28
Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

29
 References

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

30
 References

 J. Navratil, "Spoken language recognition-a step toward multilinguality in

speech processing", IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Processing, vol. 9, no. 6, pp.
678-685, 2001.
 T. Schultz and K. Kirchhoff, Multilingual Speech Processing., Academic,
2006.
 T. J. Hazen and V. W. Zue, "Segment-based automatic language
identification", J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 101, pp. 2323-2331, 1997.
 L. Haizhou, M. Bin and L. Chin-Hui, "A vector space modeling approach to
spoken language identification", IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Processing,
vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 271-284, 2007.

Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

31
Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology

32