Strategic Management Notes
Strategic Management Notes
A strategy is a unified comprehensive and integrated plan that relates the strategic advantages of
the firm to the challenges of the environment. It is designed to ensure that the basic objectives of
the enterprise are best achieved through proper execution by the organisation
Derived from Greek word „Strategoes‟ (Stratos- Army + Ago- Leading/Guiding) which
means generalship- the actual direction of military force as distinct from the policy
governing the deployment.
A plan or course of action or a set of decision rules forming a pattern or creating a
common thread.
The pattern or common thread is related to the organization‟s activities which are derived
from its policies, objectives & goals.
It is related to pursuing those activities which move an organisation from its current
position to a desired future state.
Concerned with the resources necessary for implementing a plan or following a course of
action.
Connected to the strategic positioning of a firm, making trade offs between its different
activities.
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
1
“Strategic Management is a stream of decisions and actions which leads to the development
of an effective strategy or strategies, which help to achieve corporate objectives”. William F.
Glueck
“The process which deals with the fundamental organizational renewal and growth with the
development of strategies, structures and systems necessary to achieve such renewal and
growth, and with the organizational systems needed to effectively manage the strategy
formulation & implementation processes.” Hofer & Other
BUSINESS POLICY:
It is the study of the function and responsibilities of senior management, the crucial problems
that affect success in the total enterprise and the decisions that determine the direction of the
organization and shape its future.
Business policy is the term traditionally associated with the course in business schools
devoted to integrating the educational programme of these schools and understanding what
today is called strategic management.
2. It deals with the determination of future course of action that an organization has to
adopt.
3. It involves choosing the purpose & defining what needs to be done in order to mould the
character & identity of an organization.
2
4. It is also concerned with the mobilization of resources which will help the organization to
achieve its goals.
For learning the course: - Integration of knowledge & experience gained in various
functional
areas of management.
3
For understanding the organization: - It presents a basic framework for understanding
strategic
Decisions making while a person is at the middle level of
management.
For Personal development: - It is beneficial for an executive to understand the impact of policy
shifts on
the position one occupies.
- An understanding of business policy enable executives to avail an
opportunity or avoid risk with regard to career planning and
development
- It provides an adequate grounding for understanding the macro
factors and their impact at the micro level.
- It offers a unique perspective to executive to understand the senior
management‟s viewpoint.
- It provides the organization a theoretical framework in the form of
the strategic management model, which provides powerful insights
for dealing with policy making at the macro level as well as at an
individual level through self analysis.
4
NATURE OF STRATEGIC DECISIONS:
1. Strategy may or may not involve explicit formulation of what the organization intends to
do i.e. whether or not an organization formulates a strategy, it is presumed to have
established a relationship with its environment &hence there is a strategy which can be
examined and described even though it is not spelt out in so many words.
2. While shaping the future, strategic decisions often mould the organizational identity and
character deciding whether the enterprise will continue to be in the same line of business
or combine new lines of activity with the existing business, enter new market segments or
seek to acquire a dominant position in the same market and so on.
3. Strategic decisions are primarily concerned with external rather than internal problems
and more specifically with the selection of the product mix which will be produced and
the markets to which the products will be sold, thus establishing, what Ansoff calls “ an
impedance match” between the organization and its environment.
It can also create awareness about the repercussions that an action taken in one area of
management can have on other areas individually and on the organization as a whole.
5
3. To understand the complex interlinkages operating within an organization through the
use of a systems approach to decision making and relating these to the changes taking
place in the external environment.
In terms of skills:
1. Developing skills & Apply what has been learnt (by analyzing case studies and
their interpretations.
2. To develop analytical ability and use it to understand the situation in a given case
or incident
3. Identifying factors relevant in decision making, identifying SWOT for an
organization
4. Increasing mental ability of learners and making them use this ability while taking
appropriate action.
5. Development of oral as well as written communication skills through case
analysis.
In terms of attitude:
1. To develop a „generalist‟ attitude that enables the learners to approach and assess
a situation from all possible angles.
6
2. To develop a „practitioner‟ rather than a „perfectionist‟. This is because a
generalist is able to function under condition of partial ignorance by using his or
her judgment and intuition.
Genesis of Business Policy: 1911, Harvard Business School introduced an integrative course in
management capability. The course aimed at improving the general management capabilities of
students. It was intended to tie together and give proper focus to the first year courses by
showing how the functions of business both internally and as between businesses, were closely
interrelated in practice and how a chief executive had to recognize and deal with those
relationships.
short term planning tools were the only tools with organization to rely on for future estimation &
decision making.
Around 1930s systematic attempts were made to go deep into future and prepare the
organizations for likely changes in future. Budgets control systems management by objectives
and capital budgeting techniques were pressed into service with a view to predict future impacts
based on current trends. These techniques unfortunately failed to capture the essence of future
conditions in an appropriate way.
Corporate plans, prepared by people at various levels based on current practices and likely
changes in future, were often pushed upwards for approval by top management. Top
7
management‟s participation in such lopsided exercises was minimal and there was always the
danger of the recommendations not being followed. This process is called as first generation
planning. First generation planning puts lot of emphasis on picking up an appropriate course of
action (generally a single plan) based on environmental challenges and organizational strengths
and weaknesses. The came the second generation planning in the form of strategic management
which came to occupy the center stage in the business world ,emphasizing interaction by
managers at all levels of the organizational hierarchy in planning and implementation .
Hofer - et- al called this evolution a paradigm shift. They have summarized the developments in
this regard thus:
First Phase: Paradigm of Adhoc Policy (till mid 1930s): Adhoc policy making necessitated by
the expansion of American firms in terms of product markets and customers and the consequent
need to replace informal controls and coordination by farming functional policies to guide
managers.
Second Phase: Paradigm of planned Policy (1930s – 1940s): Replacement of adhoc policy
making by planned policy formulation and shifting attention towards integration of functional
areas, in line with environmental requirements.
Third Phase Strategy Paradigm ( 1960s): Rapid force of environmental changes and
increasing complexity of managerial functions demanding a critical look at the concept of
business in relation to its environment hence the need for strategic decisions.
Fourth Phase: Paradigm of Strategic Management (1980s): shifting of focus to the strategic
management process and the responsibility of general management in resolving strategic issues.
Resolution of strategic issues that affect a business firm has been a continual endeavor in
the subject of business policy.
The general principles undergirding strategic thinking have been the focus of the efforts
of researchers and academicians in the field of business policy
8
Now there is an emerging trend to have several courses, such as the theory of strategy,
competitive strategy industry dynamics, hyper competition and global strategy in the
curriculum.
INDIAN SCENARIO:
Indian companies are now acutely aware of the need for strategic management & have been
hiring consultants to advise them on strategic matters.
9
1. Qualitative: seeking opinions on which
to base decision making.
1. Identifying trends
2. Moving averages – seasonal, cyclical, random
3. Extrapolation – simple
II. Long Range Planning: Forecasting helped organizations a lot, but still there existed a
gap between what organizations needed and what they were getting out from
forecasting. Forecasts are never error free, so planning in either case is mandatory. So
organizations started planning for long term. Day to day planning techniques were
unable to emphasize the role of future adequately. Looking into the matters with an
objective of dealing through future aspects and taking into consideration the impact of
future on today‟s position.
Long Range Planning means analyzing the future prospects and threats to make plans
and policies for current use and implementation.
III. Strategic Planning: Strategic Planning is concerned with the selection of the product
mix which a company may produce and the markets in which it may sell its products.
It is the determination of the basic long goals and objectives in an enterprise and the
adoption of courses of action and the allocation of resources necessary for carrying
out these goals.
10
FORECASTING
Forecasting is the process of making statements about events whose actual outcomes
have not yet been observed. A commonplace example might be estimation for some
variable of interest at some specified future date.
Forecasting can be described as predicting what the future will look like, whereas
planning predicts what the future should look like.
STRATEGIC PLANNING
Strategic Planning is the managerial process of developing and maintaining a strategic fit
between the organization's objectives and resources and its changing market opportunities.
Corporate Level Strategy: Strategic decisions relate to organizations wide policies and are
most useful in the case of multi divisional companies or firms having wide ranging business
interests. The nature of strategic decisions at the corporate level tend to be value oriented,
conceptual and less concrete than decisions at business or functional level. There is also greater
risk, cost and profit potential as well as greater need for flexibility associated with corporate
level strategic activities.
11
Business Level Strategy: Decision makers are primarily concerned with the immediate industry
or product- market issues and with policies bearing on the integration of the functional units.
Business level strategic decisions translate the general statements of direction and intent
generated at corporate level into concrete functional objectives and strategies for divisions or
strategic business units (SBUs).
Strategic decisions at business level should include policies including new product development,
marketing mix, research & development, personnel, etc.
Functional level strategy: It involves decision making with respect to specific functional areas-
production, marketing, personnel, finance, etc. Decisions at functional levels stress on „doing
things right‟.
Operating level strategies are concerned with initiatives for managing frontline operating units
(like plants, sales districts, etc.) and for handling day to day tasks of strategic significance.
Although of limited scope, operating strategies add further detail and completeness to functional
strategies as also to the overall business plan.
Strategic Decision Making means moulding the organizational identity and character deciding
whether the enterprise will continue to be in the same line of business or combine new lines of
activity with the existing business, etc.
It means choosing the best strategic alternative from a variety of available options which would
affect the strategic positioning of the firm.
Strategic Decisions: Strategic Decisions are mainly concerned with external rather than internal
problems.
12
Operating decisions: Decisions related to the day to day activities or current operations
Decisions concerned with the authority & responsibility relationships, work flows,
communication, developing sources of raw material supply.
1. Top Management Involvement: Strategic decisions are very crucial for organization, so
involvement of top management is mandatory. Even if top management does not involve
in the actual practice & implementation process but it supports each and every phase of
strategy formulation, implementation & control.
2. Allocation of large amount of resources: All the strategic decisions involve a
requirement of large amount of resources to be allocated. A firm may use a large amount
of manpower, machinery, money, materials in the strategic implementation, so
organization needs to allocate a large amount of resources.
3. Impact on long term prosperity of the firm: All the strategic decisions are crucial for
the firm. They affect long term prosperity of the firm. These decisions either make them
worst or better.
4. Future oriented: Strategic decision making is a proactive entrepreneurial approach.
5. Multi functional consequences: One strategy of the organization effects different
functional units & businesses of the firm. So strategic decisions have multi functional or
multi business consequences.
6. Readiness to make „non- self generative‟ decisions: Strategic decisions are non-
frequent decisions. These are contingent decisions to be made any time when required
and thus are non- self generative decisions.
7. Other determinants of strategy besides opportunities & capabilities: Values &
preferences of managers, managers‟ attitude towards risk, managerial power relations,
and social obligations of organization also determine the strategic decisions.
13
1. Criteria: „Criteria‟ refers to the long term orientation of organization towards objectives
& achievement of objectives. Different organizations may have different viewpoints
towards the achievement of their organizational objectives. Some organizations may wish
to achieve their objectives up to a satisfactory level; others may wish to maximize their
achievement of objectives. A few others may look at it in incremental approach, i.e.
movement toward objectives in small, logical & incremental steps.
B. Satisfaction
C. Incrementalism
2. Rationality: Rationality refers to the decision making without any biasness, with the help
of complete information of all the alternative strategies & evaluation techniques.
Rationality means exercising a choice from among various alternative courses of action
in such a way that it may lead to the achievement of the objectives in the best possible
manner. Different firms, on the basis of their approach towards achievement of objectives
may have different rationalities. For example, those who support the maximizing
criterion consider a decision to be rational if it leads to profit maximization.
3. Creativity: To be creative, a decision must be original and different. A creative strategic
decision making process may considerably affect the search for alternatives where novel
and untried means may be overlooked for and adopted to achieve objectives in
exceptional manner. Develop the ability to go beyond and think and use creativity in
strategic decision making.
4. Variability: Different organizations, managers, persons have different viewpoint toward
same situation. They may handle the same situation differently and thus may have
different solutions to the same problem. This happens due to variability in decision
making. It also suggests that every situation is unique and there are no set formulas that
can be applied in strategic decision making.
CORPORATE PLANNING
14
It is described as a formal, systematic managerial process, organized by responsibility, time
and information, to ensure that operational, project planning and strategic planning are
carried out regularly to enable top management to direct and control the future of enterprise.
1. Project Planning
2. Operational Planning
3. Strategic Planning
Project Planning:
These are short term exercises, less risk is involved. It is a simpler decision making than
other two components of corporate planning.
Project Planning: It is a forward looking exercise, concerned with new markets, new
products, and new facilities. Any new plan, task organization is starting with, is to be covered
under projects of the organization. Most of the projects are long term, and are of vital
importance for the organization.
15
and disposition of resources. Formulation of a unified, comprehensive and integrated plan
aimed at relating the strategic advantage of the firm to the challenges of the environment.
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
“The process through which organizations analyze and learn from their internal &
external environments, establish strategic direction, create strategies that are intended to help
achieve established goals and execute strategies all in an effort to satisfy key organisational stake
holders.”
3. General management responsibilities which are essential to relate the organization to the
environment in such a way that its objectives may be achieved.
16
2. Enhanced capability of problem prevention: Encouraged and rewarded subordinates
17
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PROCESS- PHASES IN STRATEGIC
MANAGEMENT
PERFORMING ESTABLISHING
STRATEGIC STRATEGIC
EVALUATION & INTENT
CONTROL
IMPLEMENTATI FORMULATION
ON OF OF STRATEGIES
STRATEGIES
18
ESTABLISHING STRATEGIC INTENT
Creating Vision,
Creating & communicating a vision Mission, Business
Designing a mission statement definition, Goals &
Defining the business Objectives
Setting goals & objectives
FORMULATION OF STRATEGIES
IMPLEMENTAION OF STRATEGIES
Project Implementation
Activating Strategies Procedural
Designing Structures & systems Implementation
Resource Allocation
Managing behavioral implementation
Structural Implementation
Managing functional implementation
Behavioral
Operationalising strategies Implementation
Functional
Implementation
PERFORMING STRATEGIC EVALUATION & CONTROL Evaluation &
reformulation of
Performing strategic Evaluation
strategies
Exercising strategic control
Reformulating strategies
19
WORKING MODEL OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PROCESS
Strategic Control
Find out opportunities and threats operating in the environment and the
strengths & weaknesses of an organization in order to create a match between
them.
20
Opportunities can be availed and threats‟ impact can be neutralized.
End result of strategic analysis and choice is “strategic plan” which can b
implemented in the organization
21
HIERARCHY OF STRATEGIC INTENT/ STRATEGIC VISION, CORPORATE
MISSION, OBJECTIVES & GOALS
STRATEGIC INTENT:
Intents normally go out of the present capabilities and market positions. They show a deep seated
commitment to winning even against odds.
This concept entails keeping in mind the idea of winning by virtue of motivating people, leaving
room for team contributions, maintaining their enthusiasm and guiding resource allocation
keeping in view the intent.
VISION:
To inspire members to work for the ultimate purpose with clarity of purpose, hope and
unity of purpose even with diversity of personal causes. It gives a sense of direction in
which to go on without ever reaching it.
It is rather imaginary or lacking substance. It is more than defining its future products.
It is the basic principle on which organization will work regardless of what happens
inside the organization and its environment.
22
It is the binding force for different parts of an organization to have shared values and not
to go in different directions even if they may be following different strategies.
Strategic Vision: A mental perception of the kind of environment that an organization aspires to
create with a broad time frame.
Good visions represent discontinuity, a step function and a jump ahead so that the
company knows what it is to be.
A good vision is competitive, original and unique. It makes sense in market place as it is
practical.
It represents integrity. It is truly genuine and can be used for the benefit of people.
23
MISSION:
It is the statement which defines the role that an organization plays in a society.
Mission may be described as the scope of operation in terms of products and markets or of
service and client.
An organization‟s mission statement tells what it is, why it exists and the unique
contribution it can make to the society.
It is defined as the fundamental, unique purpose that sets it apart from other firms of its type. It
indicates the nature and scope of business operations in terms of products, markets &
technologies.
Components of Mission:
„Self concept‟ that people affiliated should have of the firm, which may include
management style and work ethics.
2. Precise: It should not be so narrow as to restrict the organization‟s activities, nor should
it be too broad to make itself meaningless.
3. Clear: It should be clear enough to lead to action. Neither should it be a high sounding
set of platitudes meant for publicity purposes.
24
4. Motivating: It should be felt worthwhile working.
VISION MISSION
25
BUSINESS DEFIINITION:
„It is a description of the products, activities or functions and markets that the firm presently
pursues.‟
Markets: - Classes/ types of customers or geographic regions where the product/ service
is sold.
1. Customer groups
2. Customer functions
3. Alternative technologies
26
Levels at which business could be defined:
Business could either be defined at the corporate level or SBU (Strategic business unit level)
level. A single business firm is active in just one area so its business definition is simple
A large conglomerate, operating in several businesses, would have a separate business definition
for each of its businesses.
Corporate level: Business definition concerns itself with the functions & alternative
technologies
SBU level: Each division have more accurate business definitions covering all the three
dimensions.
GOALS: goals denote what an organization hopes to accomplish in a future period of time.
They represent a future state or an outcome of the effort put in now. A broad category of
financial & non- financial issues are addressed by the goals that a firm sets for it.
OBJECTIVES: these are the ends that state specifically how the goals shall be achieved. They
are concrete and specific in contrast to goals which are generalized. In this manner, objectives
make the goals operational.
1. They define the organisation‟s relationship with its environment. With employees,
customers & society.
27
3. They provide the basis for strategic decision making by directing the attention of
strategists to those areas where strategic decisions need to be taken. They lead to desired
standards & help to coordinate strategic decision making.
1. Understandable
5. Challenging
Need of Objectives:
They provide organization with more tangible targets than mission statements
28
4. Past development of the firm
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Analysis is the tracking of an opportunity or threat to a source. It also involves breaking a whole
into its parts to find its nature, function and relationships.
These decisions lead to other decisions- whether to react, ignore, and try to influence or
anticipate the opportunities or threats discovered. Thus, manager‟s perception of the environment
may differ from its objective condition.
In effect, diagnosis is an opinion resulting from an analysis of the facts to determine the nature of
a problem with a view to acting to take advantage of an opportunity or to effectively manage a
threat.
ENVIRONMENT
„Environment of an organization is the aggregate of all conditions, events and influences that
surround and affect it.‟
“Business Environment consists of totality of all factors which are external to and largely beyond
the control of individual business firms.”
29
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS/ ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL/
ENVIRONMENTAL SCANNING
“It is the process by which corporate planners monitor economic, governmental, suppliers,
technological and market settings to determine the opportunities for and threats to their
enterprise”
Identifying and analyzing environmental influences individually and collective to determine their
potential effects on an organization.
I. ANALYSIS:
Identify the current strategy the firm uses to relate to the environment. What are the
assumptions or predictions about the environment on which current strategy is based?
Predict the future environmental conditions the same as in step one or is there a gap?
II. DIAGNOSIS:
Assess the significance of the gap between the current and the future environments
for the firm. Are changes in objectives needed? Do changes in the strategies or not?
CHARACTERISTICS OF ENVIRONMENT
1. Environment is complex- Many factors, events, conditions, instances are uncertain &
turbulent. It is difficult to grasp in its totality.
4. Environment has far reaching impact: Environment influences the growth & profitability
of an organization.
30
NEED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCANNING
1. Need to analyze the conditions like opening up new opportunities & major threats for
better future.
5. Strategic decision makers are better able to narrow the range of available alternatives and
eliminate options that are clearly inconsistent with forecast opportunities.
It is a holistic exercise in the sense that it must comprise a total view of the environment rather
than viewing trends piecemeal.
The analysis of environment must be a continuous process rather than being an intermittent
scanning system.
Scanning: General scanning is essential to pick up new signals from the environment to keep
track of shifts in the overall pattern of developing trends.
Monitoring: It is designed to focus closely on the track of previously identified trends which
have been analyzed & assessed & found to be of particular importance of the firm.
It is heuristic/ exploratory process. While the monitoring aspect of the system is concerned with
present developments, a larger part of the process seeks to explore the unknown terrain, the
dimensions of possible futures, what could happen, not necessarily what will happen.
CATEGORIZATION OF ENVIRONMENT
31
External Environment: It includes all the factors outside the organisation which provide
opportunities or pose threats to the organisation.
Internal Environment: It refers to all the factors within an organisation which impart strengths
or cause weaknesses of strategic nature.
I. GENERAL ENVIRONMENT
SOCIO ECONOMIC
TECHNOLOGICAL
CULTURAL
POLITICAL
ECONOMICAL
REGULATARY
CUTOMERS
SUPPLIERS
32
COMPETITORS
MARKET ENVIRONMENT:
Customer/ client factors: Factors like needs preferences, perceptions, attitudes, values
bargaining power, buying behavior and satisfaction of customers.
2. Product Factors: Demand of product, Image of Product, features, utility, function, design, life
cycle, price, promotion, distribution, differentiation & availability of products or services.
3. Marketing intermediary factors: Distribution channels, logististics, cost, delivery system &
Financial intermediaries
4. Competitor related factors: Factors like different competitors, entry & exit of major
competitors, nature of competition, and relative strategic position of major competitors.
SUPPLIER ENVIRONMENT: It consists of the factors related to the cost, reliability and
availability of the factors of production or service that have an impact on the business of an
organization.
33
2. Technol
ogical development, rate of change of technology, research & development.
ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT: Macro level factors related to the means of production &
distribution of wealth which have an impact on the basis on the business of an organization.
5. Economic Indices (national Income, Distribution of Income, Per capita Income, GND,
GDP)
5. Policies related with public sector, SSIs, Sick Industries, Consumer protection, Pollution
control.
34
POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT: Factors related to management of public affairs a7 their
impact on the business of an organization.
1. Demographic characteristics
3. Socio-cultural attitudes & values (Expectations from society, beliefs, rituals & practices)
35
6. Global demographic patterns
1. EVENTS: Events are important and specific occurrences, taking place in different environmental sectors.
2. TRENDS: trends are the general tendencies or the courses of action along which events take place.
3. ISSUES: Issues are the current concerns that arise in response to events and trends
4. EXPECTATIONS: Expectations are the demands made by interested groups in the light of their concern for
issues.
Such information is not only helpful in strategic management, but also in operational
activities.
2. Ad hoc approach: Conducting special surveys & studies to deal with specific
environmental issues from time-to-time.
Changes & unforeseen developments may also be investigated with regard to their impact
on the organization.
36
3. Processed form approach: An organization uses information in a processed form
available from different sources both inside and outside the organization.
I. PEST ANALYSIS:
c. Taxation policy
e. Employment laws,
f. Government stability.
b. GNP trends
c. Interest rates
d. Money supply
e. Inflation
f. Unemployment
g. Disposable Income
37
b. Income distribution
f. Consumerism
g. Levels of education
f. Rates of obsolescence
2. It may also be helpful in identifying long term drivers of change in the environment.
38
II. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT: By
MICHAEL PORTER
The model analyses the five forces which determine the intensity and state of competition in
an industry and the collective impact of which determines the long run profit potential in the
industry.
The objective of the model is to study the competitive environment of the firm and analyzing
the collective impact of the competition on profit potential of the firm. Strategic competitive
advantage ensures and enhances the profit potential of the firm. So, this model is the
diagnosis of intensity and state of competition in an industry and its influence on an
organisation.
These five forces are and the issues related to these forces are:
o Number of competitors
o Size of competitors
o Exit barriers
o Product differentiation
o Types of barriers
39
o Extent of barriers
o Position of organisation
o Product differentiation
o Price differentiation
o Public Image
o Concentration of suppliers
o Monopoly of supplier
o Concentration of buyers
o Switching cost
o Substitutes available
40
Degree of
competitive rivalry
Bargaining power of
customers
Threat of potential
Organisation entrants
Bargaining power of
suppliers
Threats of potential
and actual
substitutes
Given by Glueck
It involves division of environment into different sectors and then analyzing the
impact of each sector into sub factors and then the impact of each sub factor on the
organisation.
Sub dividing each sector into sub factors and then the impact of each sub factor on the
organisation on the organisation is describes in the form of a statement.
Some aspects of strategic planning act as the basis of ETOP and are given special emphasis
41
1. Selection of issues: Critical success factors of organisation, Competitive domestic trends,
global competition, export potential, customer or user preferences, technological trends,
diversification opportunities.
It is a nine-cell matrix which an organisation designs to identify the factors which are
most crucial for them to work upon.
Issue: An issue is a factor which if it develops, can have a significant effect on the
firm in the future.
Assess the probability (from low to high) of these trends actually occurring.
Attempt to ascertain the likely impact (fro low to high) of each of these trends
on the corporation.
Prepare Select Establish Verify Forecast Write
background Past potential
Critical each scenerio
behavior for future
Indicators indicator
each
events
42
indicator
Probable impact on Corporation
43
INTERNAL/ ORGANISATIONAL ANALYSIS
Scanning & analyzing the external environment for opportunities and threats is not enough to
provide an organisation a competitive advantage. Strategic managers must also look within the
corporation itself to identify internal strategic factors. Those critical strengths and weaknesses
which are likely to determine whether the firm will be able to take advantage of opportunities
while avoiding threats. This internal scanning often referred to as organisational analysis is
concerned with identifying and developing an organisation‟s resources.
An organisation uses different types of resources & exhibits a certain type of behavior.
Interplay of these resources along with the prevalent behavior produces synergy with an
organisation; which leads to the development of strengths & weaknesses over a period of time.
1. All enterprises are not equally strong in all their functional attributes: Companies with a
highly competent general management team may not have an equally favorable
competitive advantage. One which is financially sound and prosperous may be lagging in
R & D efforts.
2. The effect of deficiencies on companies‟ prosperity & growth is certainly visible. It is
evidenced over a period of time when some companies continue to grow and prosper
while others stagnate and decline.
3. Executives must be aware of their competencies as well as deficiencies to be able to
match their capabilities with the environmental challenges and threats. Awareness of
corporate strengths & weaknesses can be possible only if there is a systematic analysis of
the factors reflecting strategic advantages.
Indeed the basic purpose of analyzing internal resources and capabilities is for the strategist
to ascertain what the company is capable of doing. Considering the external environment in
which it operates.
44
The choice of corporate strategy is predicted on 2 sets of considerations:
Organisational resources: The organisational resources are the formal systems & structures as
well as informal relations among groups. A firm is a bundle of resources- tangible, intangible.
These include all assets, capabilities, organisational processes, information, knowledge and so
on. These resources could be classified as physical, human and organisational resources.
45
a. Physical resources- technology, plant & equipment, geographic location, access to raw
materials.
b. Human resources- Training, experience, judgment, intelligence, relationships and so on.
c. Organisational resources- Formal systems & structures as well as informal relations
among groups.
But the mere possession of resources does not make an organisation capable. Much depends on
their usage within an organisation. The usage in turn is based on organisational behavior.
Organisational behavior: It is the manifestation of the various forces & influences operating in
the internal environment of an organisation that create the ability for, and place constraints in the
usage of resources.
Organisation‟s resources & behavior do not exist in isolation. They combine in a complex
fashion to create strengths & weaknesses within the internal environment of an
organisation.
Synergistic effects: Like resources & behavior, strengths & weaknesses do not exist individually
but combine in a variety of ways. Synergy is a situation where attributes do not add
mathematically but combine to produce an enhanced or a reduced impact. This is synergistic
effect.
The synergy is the idea that the whole of is greater or lesser than the sum of its parts. It is also
expressed as „the-two-plus-two-is-equal-to-five-or-three-effect‟
Competencies: These are special qualities possessed by an organisation that make them
withstand pressures of competition in the market place. Synergistic effects manifest themselves
in terms of organisational competencies. Net result of strategic advantage and disadvantages that
exist for an organisation determines its ability to compete with its rivals. These may b unique
resources, core capabilities, invisible assets or embedded knowledge in the organisation.
Distinctive competence any advantage a company has over its competitors because it can do
something which they cannot or it can do something better than they can.
46
Difference between competencies, core competencies & distinctive competencies lies in the
degree in the uniqueness associated with them.
A special case of strategic advantage where there is one or more identified rivals against whom
rewards or penalties could be measured is known as competitive advantage.
47
1. MARKETING & DISTRIBUTION FACTORS:
a. Competitive position and market share
b. Product line
c. Product life cycle
d. Pricing strategy
e. Mature of the market
f. Channels of distribution
g. Brand image
h. Market research
i. Packaging
j. Marketing policy
2. FINANCE & ACCOUNTING FACTORS:
a. Financial resources & strength
b. Capital structure & cost of capital
c. Relations with owners (shareholders)
d. Financial planning & budgeting
e. Accounting system & audit procedures
f. Tax planning & tax advantages.
3. PRODUCTION & OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT:
a. Cost of operations
b. Capacity utilization (existing demand can be fulfilled & capital fully utilized or
not)
c. Production facilities
d. Cost & availability of materials & components
e. Plant location
f. Purchasing & inventory control
g. Operation procedures (design, testing, scheduling & quality control)
h. Production control & management information
4. RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING:
a. Facilities created (adequate labs, equipments, tooling & testing arrangements)
b. R&D expenditure
48
c. Results of R&D efforts
d. Technical expertise & personnel
e. Work environment (creativity & innovation)
f. Nature of R&D projects (long term projects/ short term projects)
5. H.R & ORGANISATIONAL FACTORS:
a. Organisational climate
b. Employees performance record (consistency)
c. Personnel policies & practices (effectively implemented or not?)
d. Managerial/ leadership style
e. Union-management relationships
f. Corporate image (source of loyalty & pride for employees)
6. GENERAL MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY- It is defined as its propensity & its
ability to engage in behavior which will optimize attainment of firm‟s objectives.
A profile of general management capability should therefore comprise the following
aspects
1. Managers- Mentality, power, competence, capacity
2. Organisational climate- Culture (attitude towards change, risk, time perspective,
critical success factors)
3. Organisational competence- problem solving skills, organisational structure‟s
flexibility, managerial reward system, organisational capacity.
Identifying the series of activities which are undertaken by the firm and are strategically
relevant for meeting customers demand and in respect of which the firm may potentially
have an edge over its competitors. Thus, internal factors of key importance are sought to
be linked with the chain of value activities through systematic identification of the
discrete activities as potential sources of strengths & weaknesses.
49
1. Primary activities- Activities connected with physical creation of firm‟s product /
service, its marketing & delivery provision of after sales support.
2. Support Activities-Activities which provide inputs or infrastructure for primary
activities to be performed.
PRIMARY ACTIVITIES:
Inbound Logistics: Activities associated with storage and flow of inputs to the product like
material handling, warehousing, inventory control, vehicle scheduling & returns to suppliers. It
involves activities like warehousing, material handling, inventory control, scheduling.
Operations: Activities associated with transformation of inputs into final products like
machining, assembly, packaging, equipment maintenance, testing and facility operation belong
to this category.
50
Outbound logistics: Activities associated with collection, storage, physical distribution of
finished goods, order processing, scheduling deliveries, operation of delivery vehicles.
Marketing & sales: Activities like advertising, sales promotion, sales force management,
channel selection, channel relation, pricing.
Service: Activities aimed at providing services to enhance or maintain the value of the product,
like installation, repair, training, supply of parts & product adjustment.
SUPPORT ACTIVITIES
Provide infrastructure for primary activities and required to be identified by isolating them on the
basis of technological & strategic distinctiveness.
It provides guidance for a systematic internal analysis of the firm‟s existing or potential strengths
& weaknesses.
It enables the strategist to identify key internal factors for closer examination as potential
services of competitive advantage.
51
FUNCTIONAL AREA PROFILE & RESOURCE DEPLOYMENT MATRIX
52
Choice of competitor firms should also b appropriate i.e. companies in same phase of
product life cycle, with similar mission statements and more than one company should be
considered.
Strengths & weaknesses should be diagnosed on the basis of operational details and
also on the basis of key areas & indicators.
These areas may be the areas of activity of company excellence, activities of poor
performance.
Identification of intensity of weaknesses.
53
outlay (%)
Focus of
efforts
It systematically evaluates the strategic advantage factors and diagnose each factor in each
functional area and then prepares a detailed profile.
It is also taken in consideration that how much strength can be relied upon and how long will it
be considered as an advantage in the near future.
It must also recognize the danger of relying on strengths in a particular area without
simultaneously reckoning the capabilities in other interdependent units of activity.
Marketing +
Operations +
R&D +
54
Finance +
SWOT Analysis
SWOT MATRIX
Strengths Weaknesses
55
Strategic decisions are the decisions that are concerned with whole environment in which the
firm operates, the entire resources and the people who form the company and the interface
between the two.
f. Strategic decisions are at the top most level, are uncertain as they deal with the future,
and involve a lot of risk.
g. Strategic decisions are different from administrative and operational decisions.
Administrative decisions are routine decisions which help or rather facilitate strategic
decisions or operational decisions. Operational decisions are technical decisions which
help execution of strategic decisions. To reduce cost is a strategic decision which is
achieved through operational decision of reducing the number of employees and how we
carry out these reductions will be administrative decision.
The differences between Strategic, Administrative and Operational decisions can be summarized
as follows-
Strategic decisions are long- Administrative decisions are Operational decisions are not
term decisions. taken daily. frequently taken.
These are considered where These are short-term based These are medium-period
The future planning is Decisions. based decisions.
concerned.
Strategic decisions are taken in These are taken according These are taken in
Accordance with organizational to strategic and operational accordance with strategic
mission and vision. Decisions. and administrative decision.
These are related to overall These are related to working These are related to
56
Counter planning of all of employees in an production.
Organization. Organization.
These deal with organizational These are in welfare of These are related to
Growth. employees working in an production and factory
organization. growth.
Formulation of strategy:
Matching ETOP & SAP by SWOT analysis provides the necessary informational
backdrop to the strategic planner.
These alternative options are evaluated and most possible alternative is chosen.
Intuition: Strategy evolves in the mind of the chief executive without ever being explicitly
stated and without the aid of formal procedures.
- Along with intuition, personal judgment is also a necessary element in this approach.
- Problems, opportunities and „bright ideas‟ do not arise according to some time table; they
have to be dealt with whenever they happen to be perceived.
57
- Only those alternatives are considered which are important, interesting & easily
understandable.
- Instead of comprehending strictly and literally present state of affairs or the consequences
of present policies, attempt only to understand the respects in which various possible
states differ from each other and from the status quo.
- Entrepreneurial manager.
„Inside-Out‟ Planning: Strategies ought to be first conceived in a thought process arising out of
the unique talents possessed by a company.
Key factor approach: Determining really significant factors that are important in the success of
a particular business and concentrating major decisions on it.
- Evaluation of strategy.
The strategies could be formulated at different levels. There could be the corporate, SBU or
business and functional level strategies.
58
This means that a firm has to exercise a choice at three levels for choosing alternatives that
it would implement an organisation may first choose the corporate strategy & then the
SBU or business level strategy.
Corporate level strategies are decisions related to allocating resources among the
different businesses of a firm, transforming resources from one set of businesses to
others and managing and nurturing a portfolio of businesses.
In small firms, corporate strategy would mean the adoption of courses of action that
yield better profitability for the firm.
In large, multi- business firms, the corporate strategy would also be about managing
the various business definitions.
2. Psychologically, strategists may feel more satisfied with the prospects of growth
from expansion. Chief executives may take pride in presiding over organisations
perceived to be growth oriented.
59
3. Increasing size may lead to more control over the market vis-à-vis competitors.
4. Advantages from the experience curve and scale of operations may accrue.
Integration
Diversification
Co-operation
Internationalization
Digitalization
1. Concentration:
60
Ansoff‟s product- market matrix
Market
Penetration development
Development
2. Integration
Horizontal Integration: When organisation takes up the same type of products at same
level of production or marketing process. It keeps the organisation at same level. Industry
remains the same.
61
Benefits: - Economies of scale
- Economies of scope
Vertical Integration: Organisation starts making new products that serve its own needs.
Such activities are undertaken with the purpose of either supplying inputs or serving as a
customer for outputs.
3. Diversification
- Technology- related
62
Conglomerate diversification/ unrelated diversification: adoption of strategy which
requires taking up those activities which are unrelated to the existing business definition
of its businesses.
Risks in diversification:
- Complex strategy to formulate and implement needs high level of managerial, operational
and financial competence.
b. Stability Strategies
63
1. These are less risky; involve fewer changes and people feel comfortable with
things as they are.
The strategies aim at stability by causing the companies to marginally improve their
performance or at least letting them remain where they are in case they face a volatile
environment and a highly competitive market.
The essence of stability strategies is, therefore, not doing anything but sustaining
moderate growth in line with the existing trends.
c. Retrenchment strategies
64
4. Retrenchment attempts to „trim the fat‟ and results in a „slimmer‟ organisation,
bereft of unprofitable customer groups, customer functions or alternative
technologies.
d. Combination strategies
65
Strategic Implementation
An organizational control system is also required. This control system equips managers with
motivational incentives for employees as well as feedback on employees and organizational
performance. Organizational culture refers to the specialized collection of values, attitudes,
norms and beliefs shared by organizational members and groups.
Excellently formulated strategies will fail if they are not properly implemented. Also, it is
essential to note that strategy implementation is not possible unless there is stability between
strategy and each organizational dimension such as organizational structure, reward structure,
resource-allocation process, etc.
Following are the main differences between Strategy Formulation and Strategy Implementation-
Strategy Formulation includes planning and Strategy Implementation involves all those
decision-making involved in developing means related to executing the strategic plans.
organization‟s strategic goals and plans.
66
Forces before the action. forces during the action.
Strategy Evaluation
The significance of strategy evaluation lies in its capacity to co-ordinate the task performed
by managers, groups, departments etc, through control of performance. Strategic Evaluation
is significant because of various factors such as - developing inputs for new strategic planning,
the urge for feedback, appraisal and reward, development of the strategic management process,
judging the validity of strategic choice etc.
67
Among the Qualitative factors are subjective evaluation of factors such as - skills and
competencies, risk taking potential, flexibility etc.
2. Measurement of performance - The standard performance is a bench mark with which
the actual performance is to be compared. The reporting and communication system help
in measuring the performance. If appropriate means are available for measuring the
performance and if the standards are set in the right manner, strategy evaluation becomes
easier. But various factors such as managers contribution are difficult to measure.
Similarly divisional performance is sometimes difficult to measure as compared to
individual performance. Thus, variable objectives must be created against which
measurement of performance can be done. The measurement must be done at right time
else evaluation will not meet its purpose. For measuring the performance, financial
statements like - balance sheet, profit and loss account must be prepared on an annual
basis.
3. Analyzing Variance - While measuring the actual performance and comparing it with
standard performance there may be variances which must be analyzed. The strategists
must mention the degree of tolerance limits between which the variance between actual
and standard performance may be accepted. The positive deviation indicates a better
performance but it is quite unusual exceeding the target always. The negative deviation is
an issue of concern because it indicates a shortfall in performance. Thus in this case the
strategists must discover the causes of deviation and must take corrective action to
overcome it.
4. Taking Corrective Action - Once the deviation in performance is identified, it is
essential to plan for a corrective action. If the performance is consistently less than the
desired performance, the strategists must carry a detailed analysis of the factors
responsible for such performance. If the strategists discover that the organizational
potential does not match with the performance requirements, then the standards must be
lowered. Another rare and drastic corrective action is reformulating the strategy which
requires going back to the process of strategic management, reframing of plans according
to new resource allocation trend and consequent means going to the beginning point of
strategic management process.
68
There are many benefits of strategic management and they include identification,
prioritization, and exploration of opportunities. For instance, newer products, newer markets,
and newer forays into business lines are only possible if firms indulge in strategic planning.
Next, strategic management allows firms to take an objective view of the activities being done by
it and do a cost benefit analysis as to whether the firm is profitable.
Just to differentiate, by this, we do not mean the financial benefits alone (which would be
discussed below) but also the assessment of profitability that has to do with evaluating whether
the business is strategically aligned to its goals and priorities.
The key point to be noted here is that strategic management allows a firm to orient itself to its
market and consumers and ensure that it is actualizing the right strategy.
Financial Benefits
It has been shown in many studies that firms that engage in strategic management are more
profitable and successful than those that do not have the benefit of strategic planning and
strategic management. When firms engage in forward looking planning and careful evaluation of
their priorities, they have control over the future, which is necessary in the fast changing
business landscape of the 21st century. It has been estimated that more than 100,000 businesses
fail in the US every year and most of these failures are to do with a lack of strategic focus and
strategic direction. Further, high performing firms tend to make more informed decisions
because they have considered both the short term and long-term consequences and hence, have
oriented their strategies accordingly. In contrast, firms that do not engage themselves in
meaningful strategic planning are often bogged down by internal problems and lack of focus that
leads to failure.
Non-Financial Benefits
The section above discussed some of the tangible benefits of strategic management. Apart from
these benefits, firms that engage in strategic management are more aware of the external threats,
an improved understanding of competitor strengths and weaknesses and increased employee
productivity. They also have lesser resistance to change and a clear understanding of the link
between performance and rewards. The key aspect of strategic management is that the problem
solving and problem preventing capabilities of the firms are enhanced through strategic
management. Strategic management is essential as it helps firms to rationalize change and
actualize change and communicate the need to change better to its employees. Finally, strategic
management helps in bringing order and discipline to the activities of the firm in its both internal
processes and external activities.
Closing Thoughts
In recent years, virtually all firms have realized the importance of strategic management.
However, the key difference between those who succeed and those who fail is that the way in
69
which strategic management is done and strategic planning is carried out makes the difference
between success and failure. Of course, there are still firms that do not engage in strategic
planning or where the planners do not receive the support from management. These firms ought
to realize the benefits of strategic management and ensure their longer-term viability and success
in the marketplace.
70
Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Matrix is a four celled matrix (a 2 * 2 matrix) developed by
BCG, USA. It is the most renowned corporate portfolio analysis tool. It provides a graphic
representation for an organization to examine different businesses in it‟s portfolio on the basis of
their related market share and industry growth rates. It is a two dimensional analysis on
management of SBU‟s (Strategic Business Units). In other words, it is a comparative analysis of
business potential and the evaluation of environment.
According to this matrix, business could be classified as high or low according to their industry
growth rate and relative market share.
Relative Market Share = SBU Sales this year leading competitors sales this year.
Market Growth Rate = Industry sales this year - Industry Sales last year.
The analysis requires that both measures be calculated for each SBU. The dimension of business
strength, relative market share, will measure comparative advantage indicated by market
dominance. The key theory underlying this is existence of an experience curve and that market
share is achieved due to overall cost leadership.
BCG matrix has four cells, with the horizontal axis representing relative market share and the
vertical axis denoting market growth rate. The mid-point of relative market share is set at 1.0. if
all the SBU‟s are in same industry, the average growth rate of the industry is used. While, if all
the SBU‟s are located in different industries, then the mid-point is set at the growth rate for the
economy.
Resources are allocated to the business units according to their situation on the grid. The four
cells of this matrix have been called as stars, cash cows, question marks and dogs. Each of these
cells represents a particular type of business.
10 x 1x 0.1 x
71
Figure: BCG Matrix
1. Stars- Stars represent business units having large market share in a fast growing industry.
They may generate cash but because of fast growing market, stars require huge
investments to maintain their lead. Net cash flow is usually modest. SBU‟s located in this
cell are attractive as they are located in a robust industry and these business units are
highly competitive in the industry. If successful, a star will become a cash cow when the
industry matures.
2. Cash Cows- Cash Cows represents business units having a large market share in a
mature, slow growing industry. Cash cows require little investment and generate cash that
can be utilized for investment in other business units. These SBU‟s are the corporation‟s
key source of cash, and are specifically the core business. They are the base of an
organization. These businesses usually follow stability strategies. When cash cows loose
their appeal and move towards deterioration, then a retrenchment policy may be pursued.
3. Question Marks- Question marks represent business units having low relative market
share and located in a high growth industry. They require huge amount of cash to
maintain or gain market share. They require attention to determine if the venture can be
viable. Question marks are generally new goods and services which have a good
commercial prospective. There is no specific strategy which can be adopted. If the firm
thinks it has dominant market share, then it can adopt expansion strategy, else
retrenchment strategy can be adopted. Most businesses start as question marks as the
company tries to enter a high growth market in which there is already a market-share. If
ignored, then question marks may become dogs, while if huge investment is made, then
they have potential of becoming stars.
4. Dogs- Dogs represent businesses having weak market shares in low-growth markets.
They neither generate cash nor require huge amount of cash. Due to low market share,
these business units face cost disadvantages. Generally retrenchment strategies are
adopted because these firms can gain market share only at the expense of
competitor‟s/rival firms. These business firms have weak market share because of high
costs, poor quality, ineffective marketing, etc. Unless a dog has some other strategic aim,
it should be liquidated if there is fewer prospects for it to gain market share. Number of
dogs should be avoided and minimized in an organization.
The BCG Matrix produces a framework for allocating resources among different business units
and makes it possible to compare many business units at a glance. But BCG Matrix is not free
from limitations, such as-
1. BCG matrix classifies businesses as low and high, but generally businesses can be
medium also. Thus, the true nature of business may not be reflected.
2. Market is not clearly defined in this model.
3. High market share does not always leads to high profits. There are high costs also
involved with high market share.
4. Growth rate and relative market share are not the only indicators of profitability. This
model ignores and overlooks other indicators of profitability.
72
5. At times, dogs may help other businesses in gaining competitive advantage. They can
earn even more than cash cows sometimes.
6. This four-celled approach is considered as to be too simplistic.
73
Strategic leadership
Strategic leadership refers to a manager‟s potential to express a strategic vision for the
organization, or a part of the organization, and to motivate and persuade others to acquire
that vision. Strategic leadership can also be defined as utilizing strategy in the management of
employees. It is the potential to influence organizational members and to execute organizational
change. Strategic leaders create organizational structure, allocate resources and express strategic
vision. Strategic leaders work in an ambiguous environment on very difficult issues that
influence and are influenced by occasions and organizations external to their own.
The main objective of strategic leadership is strategic productivity. Another aim of strategic
leadership is to develop an environment in which employees forecast the organization‟s needs in
context of their own job. Strategic leaders encourage the employees in an organization to follow
their own ideas. Strategic leaders make greater use of reward and incentive system for
encouraging productive and quality employees to show much better performance for their
organization. Functional strategic leadership is about inventiveness, perception, and planning to
assist an individual in realizing his objectives and goals.
Strategic leadership requires the potential to foresee and comprehend the work environment. It
requires objectivity and potential to look at the broader picture.
A few main traits / characteristics / features / qualities of effective strategic leaders that do
lead to superior performance are as follows:
Loyalty- Powerful and effective leaders demonstrate their loyalty to their vision by their
words and actions.
Keeping them updated- Efficient and effective leaders keep themselves updated about what
is happening within their organization. They have various formal and informal sources of
information in the organization.
Judicious use of power- Strategic leaders makes a very wise use of their power. They must
play the power game skillfully and try to develop consent for their ideas rather than forcing
their ideas upon others. They must push their ideas gradually.
Have wider perspective/outlook- Strategic leaders just don‟t have skills in their narrow
specialty but they have a little knowledge about a lot of things.
Motivation- Strategic leaders must have a zeal for work that goes beyond money and power
and also they should have an inclination to achieve goals with energy and determination.
Compassion- Strategic leaders must understand the views and feelings of their subordinates,
and make decisions after considering them.
Self-control- Strategic leaders must have the potential to control distracting/disturbing
moods and desires, i.e., they must think before acting.
Social skills- Strategic leaders must be friendly and social.
74
Self-awareness- Strategic leaders must have the potential to understand their own moods
and emotions, as well as their impact on others.
Readiness to delegate and authorize- Effective leaders are proficient at delegation. They
are well aware of the fact that delegation will avoid overloading of responsibilities on the
leaders. They also recognize the fact that authorizing the subordinates to make decisions will
motivate them a lot.
Articulacy- Strong leaders are articulate enough to communicate the vision(vision of where
the organization should head) to the organizational members in terms that boost those
members.
Constancy/ Reliability- Strategic leaders constantly convey their vision until it becomes a
component of organizational culture.
To conclude, Strategic leaders can create vision, express vision, passionately possess vision and
persistently drive it to accomplishment.
75