His Reporting Finale
His Reporting Finale
PA SS T HE
BA LL!
UNSCRAMBLE ME!
nigrotimno
WHAT AM I ?
COMPLETE ME!
A AT N
S MO NIT OR ING
HMI N
AND EV AL UA TIO
Lesson 7
illan , Nieves
Mendoza , M
Lintapan ,
At the end o
f the lesson
should be a , the studen
ble to: ts
Explain the
purpose ,pl
and framew an,
lesson intended Describe th
orks of an H
MIS;
learning between M
e relationsh
ip
outcomes indicators ;a
and E with H
nd
MIS
Establish th
e relationsh
HMIS indica ip of
tors with he
programs alth
7.1. DEFINE, EXPLAIN, AND DISCUSS THE MONITORING AND
EVALUATION PURPOSE, PLAN, AND FRAMEWORKS
7.1.1. Monitoring and evaluation (m and e) defined
Monitoring is the systematic collection, analysis, and use of
information from programs for three purposes:
Learning from experience.
Accountability for resource use and results.
Decision-making (steering function).
Evaluation is the systematic and objective assessment of a program
or policy, focusing on:
Relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, and sustainability.
Identifying what worked, what didn’t, and areas for improvement.
Both monitoring and evaluation have:
Learning function: Lessons learned for future proposals.
Monitoring function: Reviewing implementation based on objectives and resources.
Monitoring and evaluation are complementary processes.
7.1.2 M&E PUrpose
The goal of M&E is to have a strong system for reviewing the national
health strategic plan, covering major disease programs and health
systems.
A robust M&E system is needed to assess the impact of integrated
service delivery.
It requires the use of appropriate indicators, data collection systems,
and data analysis to support decision-making.
M&E helps guide the successful implementation of services and
measures their effect on service delivery and use.
7.1.3 M&E PLAN 7.1.4 M&E FRAMEWORK
National M&E plans should cover all aspects of
M&E Framework is crucial for improving health
the health framework and be the foundation for
systems.
regular reviews.
It builds on principles from the Paris Declaration
Country M&E systems must provide information
and IHP+, focusing on aligning country health
for global monitoring while reducing the
strategies and M&E processes.
reporting burden.
The framework aims to:
Tools like JANS and the Health Systems Funding
Strengthen a common M&E platform for health
Platform help align global and national efforts.
system strengthening (HSS).
M&E tracks progress through monitoring
Align country and global M&E systems.
reports, HMIS, surveys, and evaluation studies.
Monitor health systems funding and specific
M&E strategies should:
program performance.
Focus on country needs but support global
It covers:
monitoring.
Indicator selection.
Track inputs, processes, and results of health
Data sources and analysis.
systems.
Performance review and communication.
Use data to inform decision-making.
Combine disease-specific monitoring with
health system performance tracking.
7.2 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN M&E WITH HMIS INDICATORS 7.2.1 INDICATORS FOR MONITORING FP/
IMMUNIZATION INTEGRATION
An INDICATOR can be defined as a
1. variable whose value changes. The table includes a variety of quantitative
2. measures the value of the change in meaningful units indicators. It is also important to complement
that can be compared to past and future units. collection of these data with the use of qualitative
3. It focuses on a single aspect of a program or project– techniques in order to better understand nuances
i.e., of the integration processes and solicit feedback
an input, output or the overarching objective. on the approach.