Bhopal
Bhopal
DISASTER 1984
By :
• Allene Albania Linus (45445)
• Avinashrao A/L Nageswara Rao (46363)
• Dayang Noor Azie binti Abang Zainal Abidin (45516)
• Muhd Luqman bin Mohd Yusoff (45738)
INTRODUCTION
• World’s deadliest industrial disaster
• At Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) pesticide plant, Bhopal , Madhya Pradesh
• Death toll
3,500 died in first 3 days
10,000 immediate deaths
25,000 died in long run
THE COMPANY
In the early 1980s, the demand for Location = UCIL factory was
pesticides had fallen, but Bhopal, Madhya built in 1969 which
production continued, leading to Pradesh owned by the U.S.
build-up of stores of unused MIC multinational Union
Carbide Corporation
UNION (UCC)
CARBIDE
INDIA
LIMITED UCC CEO =
Warren
UCC sold its stake in UCIL to
Anderson
Eveready Industries India
Limited (EIIL), which Produce the pesticide Sevin (UCC's
subsequently merged with brand name for carbaryl) using
McLeod Russel (India) Ltd methyl isocyanate (MIC) as an
intermediate
Rusting building at the abandoned former Union Carbide pesticide plant in Bhopal, India
The flare tower, where highly toxic methyl isocyanate gas was released into the
air in the 1984 disaster, at the abandoned Union Carbide pesticide factory in
Bhopal
www.theatlantic.com/photo/2014/12/bhopal-the-worlds-worst-industrial-disaster-30-years-later/100864/
OPERATIONAL PROBLEM
• The chloroform ratio contain in the soil is two times greater than the
maximum standard by the US Environmental Protection Energy Board
• The standard used at UCIL does not standardize with other Union Carbide
organisation around the world
• MIC physical properties, BP= 39.1 ᶿC, vapour pressure = 348 mmHg at 20 ᶿC
• UCIL have cut the production cost by stopping the operation of the cooling
system, however the chemical need to be store at 32 ᶿF and this cause the
chemical temperature to increase drastically and reach to the boiling point
easily and vaporise
Open
SEVERAL IRREGULARITIES
Shutdown of Safety system unable
The problem were
refrigeration unit Worker with no formal to cope (1st system
either fixed without
designed to keep MIC training and ordered by inoperable for days,
further examination or
cool and inhibit novice supervisor 2nd out of service for
ignored (internal leaks)
chemical reactions maintenance for weeks)
No effective public
warning for disaster. Most workers panicked
MIC plant staff cut
No brochures or public and escape leaving
from 12 to 6 people
education on responsibility
emergency
CAUSES OF THE INCIDENT
BEFORE THE INCIDENT
Dec 1981: May 1982:
•Plant operator •UC's internal
killed by safety audit
phosgene gas records 61
leak hazards.
• Thousands died the next day mainly due to choking and oedema. Stillbirth
rate and neonatal mortality rate increased drastically
• Survivors are affected with problems related to the eyes, respiratory system,
neurological system, and children’s growth
• Soil and water near plant were heavily polluted with toxic chemicals
• In 2010, a photojournalist was hospitalised after investigating the site due to toxic
environment
IMPACT ON COMMUNITY
• Healthcare became overloaded. Qualified doctors were insufficient
• UCC proposed 350 million dollars settlement figure, rejected by the Indian government
• The agreed settlement was 470 million dollars and was paid immediately by UCC
• CEO of UCC, Warren Anderson was charged in 1991. He did not appear for trial and
sought asylum in US. US rejected any extradition and he died in 2014
• In 2010, 7 UCIL employees were charged with 2 years imprisonment and 100,000 rupees.
Released after paying bail
• Currently, Dow Chemicals own the UCIL plant. However, jurisdiction was given to local
government for environmental clean up
• Clean up was incomplete, and water supply in Bhopal is still heavily contaminated
LAWS AMMENDED
Factories act
1948 and
subsequent
Manufacture, amendments
Central motor
storage and
vehicles rules
import of
(CMVR) 1989
hazardous
and
chemical (MS & New laws amendments
HC) rules, 1989 amended
after the
Bhopal Gas
Leak
Incident Chemical
Disaster accidents
management (Emergency
act 2005 PPR) rules,
Public 1996
liability
insurance
(PLI) act,
1991
SUGGESTIONS
Act seriously Sophisticated backup
Strict adherence to safety systems needed
regular review of on small
problems in developing nations
safety standards
Public education in
Sense of urgency on all developing countries
safety problems and regarding hazards of
Suggestions to
attention to worst case Avoid Bhopal
toxic substances
possibilities routine in Incident in Future
industrial
Company executives
should be technically-
Special training on not just
Rural areas of administratively
handling hazardous developing world should
facilities added in trained in businesses
not be used to that use toxic
developing nations experiment new chemicals
complex technology
CONCLUSION
• Bhopal incident cause by human error
• The error affect the residence health and polluting the environment