Approach To Evaluating Superficial Soft Tissue Masses
Approach To Evaluating Superficial Soft Tissue Masses
KEYWORDS
Ultrasound Soft-tissue lesion Soft-tissue tumor
KEY POINTS
This article presents a systematic approach to the ultrasound (US) evaluation of superficial soft tis-
sue masses.
The clinical history, the location of the lesion and its detailed characterization by US usually leads to
a confident diagnosis.
If there are inconclusive or suspicious findings by US, correlative imaging or a percutaneous biopsy
should be performed.
a
Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; b Georgetown
University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA; c Washington Radiology, Washington, DC, USA
* Corresponding author. Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3737 Market
Street, Mailbox #4, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
E-mail address: levon.nazarian@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
frequency range of 12 to 24 MHz. Deeper masses Once the mass is identified, it should be
may require a curved linear transducer in the 5 to measured in 3 dimensions. The longest axis of
9 MHz range to enable better penetration. Gener- the mass—which may not necessarily corre-
ally, the transmit frequency should be set to the spond to the long axis of the body—should be
highest level which ensures clear visualization of measured first followed by the orthogonal dimen-
the complete lesion and its surrounding tissues. sion on the same image. The transducer should
For larger masses, extended field-of-view technol- then be rotated 90 and the width measured. Us-
ogy may be helpful to include the entire mass on a ing the same measurement technique each time
single image to show the relationship of the mass will facilitate a comparison of the mass size on
to adjacent structures and enable more precise any subsequent studies. If the mass is not
measurements (Fig. 1). Most imaging can be per- measured the same way each time, the examiner
formed with a standard acoustic coupling gel. For may receive a false impression of either stability
very superficial masses a gel stand-off pad can be or growth.
used, but it is the authors’ preference to float the
transducer on a large dollop of gel. DIAGNOSTIC PATHWAY
The depth of the US image should be minimized
while still including the mass and surrounding tis- The first step in determining the etiology of the
sues. If applicable, focal zone(s) should be set at mass is localizing it to its compartment(s) of
the level of the mass. The gain and time gain origin—skin, subcutaneous tissues, muscle,
compensation curve should be set appropri- bone—as well as determining whether the mass
ately—the gain should be low enough to minimize arises from a specific musculoskeletal structure
artifacts but high enough so that low-level echoes such as joint, bursa, nerve, tendon, ligament, or
in the mass are not missed. Once the grayscale fibrocartilage such as labrum or meniscus. Placing
characteristics of the mass have been evaluated, the mass in a compartment requires paying atten-
the next step is to assess the vascularity in and tion to the anatomic layers visible on a US image
around the lesion by Doppler. Number and pattern (Fig. 2). The beam first encounters the epidermis
of blood vessels should be assessed by color and/ which creates a specular reflection but is difficult
or power Doppler, which should be optimized as to resolve with routine scanning frequencies. The
follows: depth should be minimized as for gray- first discernible layer is generally the dermis which
scale imaging; the color box should be the small- is hyperechoic to subcutaneous fat, which is the
est that still includes the mass; color gain should next layer. The subcutaneous fat layer is of varying
be set by increasing the gain until there is color thickness, is normally hypoechoic relative to the
noise, then dialing it down slowly until noise first dermis and muscle, and often has hyperechoic
appears; and if applicable, focal zone(s) should septations.1 It is a common misconception that
be placed at the level of the mass. To optimize fat is hyperechoic on US, but there is nothing
detection of slow flow, the scale and wall filter intrinsically echogenic about fat. Echoes are
should be at the lowest level that does not cause created by interfaces between tissues of differing
unacceptable color noise. Spectral Doppler is an acoustic impedances. Since subcutaneous fat is
important adjunct to confirm the presence of flow relatively homogenous, normal fat contains few
within the mass and determine whether it is arterial echoes. Separating the fat from the muscle is
and/or venous. hyperechoic fascia of varying thickness. Deep to
Fig. 1. Subcutaneous lipoma in the shoulder on standard (A) and (B) extended field of view (EFOV) sonography.
The EFOV image allows the entire mass to be depicted, so that it can be more accurately measured and its rela-
tionship to the regional anatomy better defined.
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en Pontifical Xavierian University de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en noviembre 17, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
Approach to Evaluating Soft Tissue Masses 111
this fascia is muscle which has a typical pattern is at least partially solid (Fig. 4B), whereas flow
of hypoechoic muscle bundles separated by may not be detectible within a solid mass if the
hyperechoic fibroadipose septa in a pennate flow is too slow, the internal vessels are too small,
pattern.2 and/or the Doppler technique is suboptimal.4
The echogenicity of the mass should then be Spectral Doppler will confirm the types of flow
characterized as hypoechoic, isoechoic, hypere- within the mass, arterial and/or venous. However,
choic, or mixed. Because these terms are relative, the shape of the arterial waveform has no predic-
there needs to be a standard of reference. The au- tive value regarding whether the mass is benign
thors recommend comparing the echogenicity to or malignant (Fig. 4C; Fig. 8B).5
muscle since a regional muscle can almost always A crucial fact to understand about soft tissue
be imaged in the same field of view. Next, the bor- masses is that acoustic enhancement does not
ders should be assessed: are the borders well- mean the mass is cystic. Because acoustic
defined or do they blend in almost imperceptibly enhancement is commonly used to differentiate
with surrounding tissues? It should also be noted cystic from solid masses in organs such as the
whether the mass attenuates the US beam, has kidneys, liver, and ovaries, many radiologists
no perceptible effect on the beam, or causes incorrectly assume that this finding is also appli-
acoustic enhancement. cable to superficial masses. Unfortunately, that
is not the case. In fact, in one series of superficial
IS THE MASS CYSTIC OR SOLID? metastases from melanoma, 71% of the lesions
had acoustic enhancement.3 Homogenous solid
One of the most important functions of US is to masses often attenuate the US beam less than
determine whether a mass is cystic or solid. the more heterogeneous adjacent soft tissues.
Although this task sounds straightforward, it can Thus, acoustic enhancement must never be
be tricky. The first thing to do is to evaluate the used to differentiate cystic from solid masses
grayscale appearance. On average, cystic lesions (Fig. 6).3
tend to be relatively less echogenic than solid
masses, but there are many important exceptions.
Cystic masses can have echoes within them
because of contents such as hemorrhage, pus,
or keratin (Fig. 3). Conversely, solid masses can
be relatively hypoechoic or even anechoic if their
cellular content is homogeneous with few acoustic
interfaces (Fig. 4A).3 Because the grayscale
appearance alone is unreliable, we may need to
rely on other clues. Compression should be
applied by the transducer in real time. A mass
that changes its morphology with compression
may be fluid-containing, especially if the internal
echoes swirl in real time (Fig. 5, Video 1). The Fig. 3. Epidermoid cyst in the calf. Sonography dem-
next piece of data is the Doppler evaluation. onstrates diffuse internal echoes due to keratin accu-
Doppler flow is more helpful if it is present than if mulation, the so-called “pseudotestis” appearance.
it is absent: internal flow confirms that the mass There was no internal flow on color Doppler.
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en Pontifical Xavierian University de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en noviembre 17, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
112 Garza-Báez et al
Fig. 4. Soft tissue lymphoma presenting as a subcutaneous thigh mass. Grayscale appearance (A) is hypoechoic
with low level internal echoes. (B) Extensive flow on color Doppler confirms solid nature of the mass. (C) Arterial
waveform obtained on spectral Doppler. Note the high resistance flow despite the malignant nature of the mass.
DOES THE MASS CONTAIN FAT? Fat necrosis can present as a palpable subcu-
taneous nodule virtually anywhere in the body.
For solid masses the next step is to decide The nodule may or may not be painful. There is
whether the mass is fatty because lipomas are often a history of blunt trauma, surgery, or local in-
so common, especially in the subcutaneous tis- jections.9 On US, subcutaneous fat necrosis has a
sues. The echogenicity of lipomas ranges from variable appearance—it can appear uniformly
hyperechoic to isoechoic to hypoechoic with hyperechoic or have a hypoechoic center with pe-
respect to muscle depending on how many inter- ripheral hyperechogenicity (Fig. 9). The borders
faces are created by other components such as are ill-defined and blend in with the adjacent sub-
fibrous tissue.6 Lipomas characteristically contain cutaneous fat. There is typically no significant
linear echogenic septations that are oriented along vascularity on color Doppler. Compared to li-
the long axis of the lipoma, usually parallel to the pomas, there tends to be less mass effect on the
skin (Fig. 7). There may be a defined capsule adjacent soft tissues.
around the lipoma, or the borders may blend in
with the adjacent soft tissues and be difficult to
DOES THE MASS ARISE FROM A
delineate. When applicable, bilateral comparison
MUSCULOSKELETAL STRUCTURE?
can be helpful to differentiate a normal lobulation
of fat from a lipoma. Note that on color Doppler li- The examiner should scrutinize the mass for any
pomas tend to have little or no flow.6,7 However, connection to a musculoskeletal structure since
there may be exceptions in which a lipoma dem- that connection may be the key to the diagnosis.
onstrates an atypical amount of increased flow Common examples include the following.
(Fig. 8). Although the vast majority of fatty masses
are lipomas, well-differentiated liposarcomas may Joints/Bursae
look similar to lipomas. Features raising suspicion
of liposarcoma include recent rapid growth, deep Popliteal (Baker’s) cyst
location (ie, not subcutaneous), and prominent, Baker’s cyst is a distended bursa that occurs at
irregularly branching vessels on color Doppler.8 the medial posterior aspect of the popliteal fossa.
To avoid diagnostic errors, it is important to call a
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en Pontifical Xavierian University de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en noviembre 17, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
Approach to Evaluating Soft Tissue Masses 113
Fig. 6. 2 solid masses that exhibit increased acoustic through transmission. (A) Schwannoma in the hand and (B)
Subcutaneous melanoma metastasis in the thigh.
Fig. 8. Lipoma within the biceps brachii muscle. (A) Longitudinal sonogram shows a slightly hyperechoic intra-
muscular mass with the parallel echogenic lines typical of lipoma. (B) Low resistance arterial flow within the
mass on Doppler. Because of the intramuscular location and internal flow, the mass was removed and was benign.
L, Lipoma, B, Biceps brachii.
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en Pontifical Xavierian University de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en noviembre 17, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
114 Garza-Báez et al
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en Pontifical Xavierian University de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en noviembre 17, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
Approach to Evaluating Soft Tissue Masses 115
Fig. 11. Recurrent lymphoma in the popliteal space. (A) Axial sonogram. Although Baker’s cyst can have internal
echoes, this mass is in the wrong location. It is lateral in the popliteal fossa instead of medial, and it does not have
the typical anatomy shown in Fig. 10. (B) Coronal PET/CT confirms the hypermetabolic nature.
Fig. 12. Distended iliopsoas bursa. Axial sonogram with color Doppler at the level of the right acetabulum shows
the distended bursa with diffuse internal echoes. The bursa is in its typical location posterior to the neurovascular
bundle. A, Common femoral artery; IP, Iliopsoas tendon; N, Common femoral nerve; V, Common femoral vein.
Fig. 13. Volar wrist ganglion with communication to the underlying radioscaphoid joint. R, Radial head; S,
Scaphoid.
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en Pontifical Xavierian University de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en noviembre 17, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
116 Garza-Báez et al
Fig. 15. Synovial cyst (asterisk) arising from the right acromioclavicular joint. The cyst presented as a painless
palpable mass. C, Clavicle; A, Acromion; Arrow, Synovial thickening in AC joint.
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en Pontifical Xavierian University de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en noviembre 17, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
Approach to Evaluating Soft Tissue Masses 117
Fig. 16. Parameniscal cyst (A) presenting as a large mass in at the medial knee (between cursors). In (B) the
connection to the medial meniscus is demonstrated. T, tibia, F, Femur, MM, Medial meniscus, MCL, Medial collat-
eral ligament.
Fig. 17. Sural nerve schwannoma. Note the nerve fibers entering and exiting the nerve (arrows).
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en Pontifical Xavierian University de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en noviembre 17, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
118 Garza-Báez et al
Fig. 20. Myositis ossificans presenting as a biceps femoris mass in this 73-year-old man. (A) Longitudinal sono-
gram shows the echogenic ossification (between arrows) with acoustic shadowing. (B) Radiograph confirms
the diagnosis (arrows). F, Femur.
Fig. 21. Chronic rectus femoris tear in this 22-year-old female soccer player with a history of pulled muscle in the
thigh. The patient presented for evaluation of a painless mass. (A) Longitudinal sonogram shows a contracted
hyperechoic scar tissue from prior injury (arrow). The palpable “mass” (M) represents the normally contractile
muscle fibers at the cephalad edge of the tear (arrow) accentuated by muscle contraction against resistance (B).
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en Pontifical Xavierian University de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en noviembre 17, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
Approach to Evaluating Soft Tissue Masses 119
Fig. 22. Biceps sarcoma mistaken clinically for a biceps muscle tear because of arm swelling (A) Longitudinal
extended field of view sonogram demonstrates a well-defined hypoechoic intramuscular mass. The mass was
nontender. (B) Color Doppler shows irregular internal vascularity.
Fig. 23. Muscle hernia (asterisk) presenting as a painless calf mass. Longitudinal sonogram shows muscle fibers
protruding through a fascial defect (between arrows).
Fig. 24. Arteriovenous malformation in the hand. Sonogram reveals a hypoechoic soft tissue mass with cystic
spaces, a phlebolith, and both arterial (A) and venous (B) flow. P, Phlebolith.
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en Pontifical Xavierian University de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en noviembre 17, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
120 Garza-Báez et al
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en Pontifical Xavierian University de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en noviembre 17, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
Approach to Evaluating Soft Tissue Masses 121
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en Pontifical Xavierian University de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en noviembre 17, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
122 Garza-Báez et al
3. Nazarian LN, Alexander AA, Kurtz AB, et al. Super- 13. Wunderbaldinger P, Bremer C, Schellenberger E,
ficial melanoma metastases: appearances on gray- et al. Imaging features of iliopsoas bursitis. Eur Ra-
scale and color Doppler sonography. AJR Am J diol 2002;12(2):409–15.
Roentgenol 1998;170(2):459–63. 14. Johnston CA, Wiley JP, Lindsay DM, et al. Iliopsoas
4. Alexander AA, Nazarian LN, Capuzzi DM Jr, et al. bursitis and tendinitis. A review. Sports Med 1998;
Color Doppler sonographic detection of tumor flow 25(4):271–83.
in superficial melanoma metastases: histologic cor- 15. Meaney JF, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Etherington R, et al.
relation. J Ultrasound Med 1998;17(2):123–6. Ilio-psoas bursa enlargement. Clin Radiol 1992;
45(3):161–8.
5. Kaushik S, Miller TT, Nazarian LN, et al. Spectral
16. Giard MC, Pineda C. Ganglion cyst versus synovial
Doppler sonography of musculoskeletal soft tissue
cyst? Ultrasound characteristics through a review
masses. J Ultrasound Med 2003;22(12):1333–6.
of the literature. Rheumatol Int 2015;35(4):597–605.
6. Wagner JM, Lee KS, Rosas H, et al. Accuracy of 17. Jacobson JA, Wilson TJ, Yang LJ. Sonography of
sonographic diagnosis of superficial masses. common peripheral nerve disorders with clinical cor-
J Ultrasound Med 2013;32(8):1443–50. relation. J Ultrasound Med 2016;35(4):683–93.
7. Jacobson JA, Middleton WD, Allison SJ, et al. Ultraso- 18. Paoletta M, Moretti A, Liguori S, et al. Ultrasound im-
nography of superficial soft-tissue masses: society of aging in sport-related muscle injuries: pitfalls and
radiologists in ultrasound consensus conference opportunities. Medicina (Kaunas) 2021;57(10):1040.
statement. Radiology 2022;304(1):18–30. 19. Beggs I. Sonography of muscle hernias. AJR Am J
8. Shimamori N, Kishino T, Okabe N, et al. Discrimina- Roentgenol 2003;180(2):395–9.
tion of well-differentiated liposarcoma from benign li- 20. Hoang VT, Trinh CT, Nguyen CH, et al. Overview of
poma on sonography: an uncontrolled retrospective epidermoid cyst. Eur J Radiol Open 2019;6:291–301.
study. J Med Ultrason 2020;47(4):617–23. 21. Huang Chung-Cheng, Ko Sheung-Fat, Huang Hsuan-
9. Walsh M, Jacobson JA, Kim SM, et al. Sonography Ying, et al. Epidermal cysts in the superficial soft tis-
of fat necrosis involving the extremity and torso sue. J Ultrasound Med 2011;30(1):11–7.
with magnetic resonance imaging and histologic 22. Donnelly LF, Adams DM, Bisset GS 3rd. Vascular
correlation. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27(12):1751–7. malformations and hemangiomas: a practical
approach in a multidisciplinary clinic. AJR Am J
10. Ward EE, Jacobson JA, Fessell DP, et al. Sono-
Roentgenol 2000;174(3):597–608.
graphic detection of Baker’s cysts: comparison
23. Solbiati L, Cioffi V, Ballarati E. Ultrasonography of the
with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;
neck. Radiol Clin North Am 1992;30(5):941–54.
176(2):373–80.
24. Ahuja AT. Ultrasound of malignant cervical lymph
11. Handy JR. Popliteal cysts in adults: a review. Semin nodes. Cancer Imag 2008;8(1):48–56.
Arthritis Rheum 2001;31(2):108–18. 25. Vasilevska Nikodinovska V, Ivanoski S, Kostadinova-
12. Carra BJ, Bui-Mansfield LT, O’Brien SD, et al. Sonog- Kunovska S, et al. Ultrasound-guided biopsy of
raphy of musculoskeletal soft-tissue masses: tech- musculoskeletal soft-tissue tumors: basic principles,
niques, pearls, and pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol usefulness and limitations. J Ultrason 2022;22(89):
2014;202(6):1281–90. 109–16.
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en Pontifical Xavierian University de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en noviembre 17, 2024. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.