Scribd
Upload
10 views

CPC Assignment

Uploaded by

manvendraba2124
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
10 views

CPC Assignment

Uploaded by

manvendraba2124
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Written Statement - Prahlad Singh vs.

Dalpat Kaur
Code of Civil Procedure
(An Assignment submitted to Himachal Pradesh National Law University, Shimla)

Submitted to Submitted by
Dr Navditya Tanwar Manvendra Singh

Enrolment number: 1020212224

6th Semester B.A.LLB.

HIMACHAL PRADESH NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, SHIMLA

16 MILE, SHIMLA-MANDI NATIONAL HIGHWAY, GHANDAL

DISTRICT SHIMLA, HIMACHAL PRADESH-171014

Ph. 0177-2779802, 0177-2779803, Fax: 0177-2779802


Acknowledgements

I wish to take this opportunity to offer my sincere gratitude to my academic supervisor, Dr


Navditya Tanwar, Assistant Professor, Himachal Pradesh National Law University, Shimla.
Without her kind direction and knowledgeable guidance, this study would have never come to
fruition.

I am also significantly indebted to Himachal Pradesh National Law University's e-library


resources for providing me with the necessary online subscriptions to conduct this research
which helped me in making this assignment, especially in these trying times when the physical
resources of the library are inaccessible.

Last but not the least, I would like to all my comrades who helped me in this study by constantly
motivating me and giving me useful insights.
Declaration

I hereby declare that this assignment, titled 'Written Statement – Prahlad Singh vs. Dalpat Kaur',
submitted to Himachal Pradesh National Law University, Shimla, was written by me,
Manvendra Singh Rana, and is a result of my own work, and has not been used as elsewhere for
any other exam in any other department/college/university. I further declare that this work does
not refer to/quote works of other people without acknowledging it, and all sources of information
are clearly mentioned.

Manvendra Singh Rana


(1020212224)
BEFORE THE COURT CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION), JAIPUR

IN THE MATTER OF:

Prahlad Singh S/o Kanishka Singh R/o House No. 101,


Vaishali Nagar, District Jaipur……………………………………………………. PLAINTIFF

VERSUS

Dalpat Kaur S/o Harpreet Kaur R/o House No. 99, Arjun Nagar,
District Jaipur……………………………………………………………………. DEFENDANT

WRITTEN STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT

1. That the present written statement has been filed by Dalpat Kaur S/o Harpreet Kaur R/o House
No. 99, Arjun Nagar, District – Jaipur, who is the defendant in the present case and thus well
aware of the facts and circumstances of the present case.
Hence, competent to file the present reply.

2. That the Plaintiff has instituted the present suit without any cause of action, and the same
is liable to be dismissed.

3. That the present suit had to be instituted in the Court of lowest grade competent to try it and
thus, it is not maintainable.
4. The contents of Para 1 are accepted without dispute.

5. The contents of Para 2 to 4 are accepted to be true without any changes.


6. The contents of Para 5 to 9 are falsified & not in line with the original chain of events, added
to the fact that the suit in itself is not maintainable due to it being rejected multiple times by the
court previously.

PRAYER: -

In view of the aforesaid facts, reasons, and circumstances, it is prayed before this
Hon’ble Court that the suit of the plaintiff may kindly be dismissed with costs or pass any
other order as the Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the interests of justice.
AFFIDAVIT

I, Dalpat Kaur S/o Harpreet Kaur R/o House No. 99, Arjun Nagar, District - Jaipur, do hereby
solemnly
affirm and declare as under that –
1. I am the defendant in the present case and aware with the facts and circumstances of the
present case.
2. That the accompanying reply has been drafted by the counsel on my behalf and under
my instructions.
3. The contents of the same have been explained and read over to me in vernacular and the
same are correct.

Date:

Jaipur Dalpat Kaur

Through Manvendra Singh

Counsel on behalf of plaintiff

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy