Srejovi Lepenskivirprotoneolithic 1969
Srejovi Lepenskivirprotoneolithic 1969
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
By DRAGOSLAV SREJOVIC
26
27
29
Sandstone altar from house number 45 at Lepenski Vir I; 28 x 16 cm. Lepenski Vir I: sandstone sculpture (number 12)
found in house number 33. It appears to represent
an animal head, 24 x 19 cm.
30
31
Lepenski Vir II: two sandstone works found in house number 44.
Number 41 (Left), 41 cm. high; number 38 (Right) 40 high, x 35 wide x 22 cm.
five house foundations have been clearly distinguished,tions in this region. In their buildings and general
but the abundance of stone blocks and slabs found on layout, the settlements of Stratum III differ sharply
the whole explored area indicates that at least thirty from those in Strata I and II. While the earlier set-
houses were inhabited at the time of the formation of tlements expanded along the west-east axis and always
Stratum II. The buildings still retain the trapezoidal remained within the U-shaped recess, Horizons III a
form and are not infrequently of impressive dimen- and III b spread north and south beyond the bound-
sions. Wood and stone are still the basic buildingaries of the U-shaped recess and cover an area of
materials ; large, heavy stone blocks are still used ; the approximately 5500 square meters. The houses as-
position and form of the hearths remain the same. sociated with these horizons (III a and b), though
Yet one feels that in spite of the persevering tendency only partly preserved, clearly show that the old ar-
towards the monumental, the earlier fine sense ofchitectural pattern has been completely abandoned
proportion and the care in finishing both the whole and that the sense for a planned building and com-
and the details have been lost. fortable dwelling has been lost. The basic building
material is no longer stone, but earth. Even wood is
Sandstone sculpture constitutes, in this phase too, the
most characteristic feature of the household equip- not used to any significant extent. The changes in the
ment. It is interesting that in this period, the sculp- type of building are so pronounced that very radical
tured works are made exclusively of boulders the alterations of the general conditions of life, and pre-
dimensions of which range from forty to sixty centi- sumably of the climate as well, must be assumed.
meters. Although both the position and the basic Horizon III a is characterized by pits of various size,
subjects of the sculpture continue to be the same, some of which were certainly used as underground
dwellings. In the later settlement (Horizon III b)
considerable alterations are visible in stylistic concep-
tion and technique. The surfaces of the second planequadrangular mud huts were built above ground.
are considerably deeper, so that the sculpture takes on Inside them on the floor of stamped clay, there is
a more pronounced plastic quality. The techniquefrequently an oven with a U-shaped base of rubble and
becomes considerably freer, but on the other hand, the an upper structure of fired earth. Stone sculpture,
earlier, skillfully achieved harmony between the nat- microlithic tools and heavy stone clubs disappear
ural outline of the boulder and the plastic content completely, but the pottery shows a surprising abun-
infused into it has been disturbed. dance of forms and techniques of decoration.
A total of fifteen works of sculpture was discov- The pottery forms characteristic of Stratum III
ered in Stratum II. Seven of these have figures and include deep hemispherical bowls, spherical vessels
the remaining eight are decorated with ornamentalwith a curved or cylindrical neck, shallow conical
patterns. The figures again represent only the human dishes on a ring foot; also a unique ceramic form:
head, but now they have pronounced fish-like fea- large vases with a wide quadrangular bowl on a
tures; in some cases they attain monumental propor- perforated quadrangular foot. The predominant type
is monochrome ware and pottery with roughened
tions. Two figures from this phase combine orna-
mental motives with human features. More striking uneven external surface decorated with incisions and
impressions of fingers or nails. Vases with white
changes, however, are noticeable in the works modeled
(Horizon III a) and later (Horizon III b), dark
in the ornamental style. In this phase, curvilinear
motives yield to rectilinear ornaments, with a prev- painted ornaments on a red background represent only
alence of chevrons, zigzags or broken angular lines sporadic finds. Numerous burnished stone axes, bone
and plaits. While the tools and weapons of stone andtools and pendants of fired clay or of bone complete
bone are the same as in the preceding phase, a certain
the otherwise very rich equipment from these latest
decline in the number of stone implements is notice-habitation horizons.
able, although this stratum yielded an exceptionally
finely engraved stone club in the form of a fish. The special significance of Lepenski Vir lies in
the fact that below the horizons with the material
The finds from the two latest habitation hori- of the previously known Stracevo-Körös-Cris Culture,
zons (a and b) which form Stratum III and overlie thehave been found with monuments of a prehis-
strata
earlier settlements entirely, are of particular toric
impor-culture which has been up to now unknown in
tance for the understanding and chronology of thetheDanubian region and in the broader Euro-Asian
territory. The archaeological material from Horizons
culture represented in Strata I and II. The settlements
III a and III b is definitely associated with the finds
of Stratum III are associated with the full flowering
of the Early Neolithic ceramic culture, the Starčevo-
characteristic of the earliest phase of the Starčevo
Körös-Cris Culture already well-known from Culture,
excava- which can be dated safely in the first half
33
34
35