Automotive VDA Component Requirements Specification Standard Structure
Automotive VDA Component Requirements Specification Standard Structure
1
Joint Quality Management in the Supply Chain
2
Non-binding VDA recommendation
The Association of the German Automotive Industry (VDA) recommends its
members to apply the following VDA Volume for the implementation and
maintenance of quality management systems.
Exclusion of Liability
VDA volumes are recommendations available for general use. Anyone who
implements them is responsible for ensuring that they are used correctly in
each case.
This VDA volume takes into account state-of-the-art technical procedures,
current at the time of issue. Implementation of VDA recommendations re-
lieves no one of responsibility for their own actions. In this respect, every-
one acts at their own risk.
The VDA and those involved in VDA recommendations shall bear no liabil-
ity.
If during the use of VDA recommendations, errors or the possibility of mis-
interpretation are found, it is requested that the VDA be notified immedi-
ately so that any possible faults can be corrected.
Copyright
This publication is protected by copyright. Any use outside of the strict lim-
its of copyright law is not permissible without the consent of the VDA and is
liable to prosecution. This applies in particular to copying, translation, mi-
crofilming and the storing or processing in electronic systems.
Translations
This publication will also be issued in other languages. The current status
must be requested from VDA QMC.
Note on gender
For reasons of readability, the masculine form is used throughout this text.
However, all information applies to both genders.
1
Foreword
Companies and manufacturers in the automotive industry are faced with a
dynamic environment characterized by increasingly complex products, new
technologies, and challenges with regard to product quality as well as con-
formity. Cutting-edge technologies have to be implemented more and more
quickly in the individual projects. In order to allow for successful collabora-
tion when working on new projects, it is necessary to ensure clear and pre-
cise communication regarding the requirements and objectives for the
products to be developed. The present VDA volume is a completely revised
edition and is the result of major revisions and updates in terms of content.
In addition to experiences from the past several years, new aspects such
as agile working methods have been taken into account (among other
things). New requirements regarding electronics, software applications,
product compliance, functional safety, cybersecurity and other aspects
have been incorporated and/or updated according to the current state of
technology. Furthermore, the present volume was aligned with other VDA
volumes and the regulatory requirements set out in ISO 9001 and IATF
16949.
2
project and product-specific requirements regarding the project to be devel-
oped are described within the new module II.
3
Contents
Foreword 2
Contents 4
List of Illustrations 6
1 Introduction 7
2 Objective and purpose 10
2.1 Significance of the Component Requirements Specification 10
2.2 Objective and purpose of the VDA Component Requirements
Specification standard structure 10
2.2.1 Added value for the customer 11
2.2.2 Added value for suppliers 12
3 General description and definition 13
3.1 General description 13
3.2 Definitions – Component Requirements Specification and
functional specification 13
4 Application 15
4.1 General information 15
4.2 Overview of the modules 15
4.2.1 Module I – Process and organization originated requirements
15
4.2.2 Module II – Project and product-specific requirements 16
5 Formulating precise requirements 18
5.1 Objective and purpose 18
5.2 Quality criteria 18
6 The Component Requirements Specification process in the
supply chain 21
7 Requirements management with IT support 23
8 VDA Component Requirements Specification standard
structure 24
8.1 Module I – Process and organization originated requirements 24
8.1.1 Project management 24
8.1.2 Risk management 26
8.1.3 Environment and sustainability 26
8.1.4 Functional safety 28
8.1.5 Cybersecurity management 28
8.1.6 Software update management 28
8.1.7 Data protection 28
8.1.8 Supply chain management 29
8.1.9 Releases 31
8.1.10 Quality management system 31
8.1.11 Quality assurance 32
8.1.12 Requalification 32
8.1.13 Reporting and documentation 32
4
8.1.14 Spare part and service requirements 32
8.1.15 Configuration and variant management 33
8.1.16 Non-conformity management 33
8.1.17 Change management 33
8.1.18 Data management 33
8.1.19 Test management 33
8.1.20 Standard and carry-over parts 34
8.1.21 Logistics 34
8.1.22 Labeling and traceability of parts, components and data 34
8.1.23 Requirements regarding test and prototype tools and
production 34
8.1.24 Applicable documents 34
8.2 Module II – Project and product-specific requirements 35
8.2.1 Objective and scope of the project 35
8.2.2 Traceability 35
8.2.3 Description of the product and function 36
8.2.4 Product-specific requirements 36
8.2.5 Technical and functional requirements 36
8.2.6 Product compliance 40
8.2.7 Specific test requirements 40
8.2.8 Non-functional requirements 41
9 Definitions, terms, abbreviations 44
9.1 Weak word list 45
5
List of Illustrations
Figure 1: Challenges in the product development process ................ 8
Figure 2: Added value of a standardized Component Requirements
Specification ...................................................................... 11
Figure 3: The Component Requirements Specification within the
product development process ........................................... 13
Figure 4: Overview of the contents of module I ................................ 16
Figure 5: Structure of module II in the VDA Component
Requirements Specification .............................................. 17
Figure 6: Standard process in requirements engineering ................ 18
Figure 7: Proposed sentence structure ............................................ 20
Figure 8: The Component Requirements Specification process in the
supply chain ...................................................................... 22
6
1 Introduction
Within the automotive industry, vehicle projects and the required parts,
components, software, services as well as assemblies are implemented in
collaboration with external providers of required resources (external suppli-
ers). The vehicles do not only present challenges in relation to the relevant
markets, they also feature the latest technologies. In addition to the expec-
tations of the end users, the relevant statutory requirements or require-
ments imposed by regulatory bodies/approval authorities must be met and
taken into account. Even during the product development process, im-
portant proofs of conformity regarding the product and its implementation
processes must be available. Given these current challenges in the auto-
motive industry, car manufacturers (OEM) as well as the suppliers they
work with have to meet various objectives in terms of requirements man-
agement (see Figure 1):
• Management, definition, description, agreements on require-
ments at the various levels of abstraction (vehicle, system,
module, component, part, software),
• Keeping records of proofs and managing information regarding
the requirements
• Ensuring that requirements are met along the upstream value
and supply chains.
7
Figure 1: Challenges in the product development process
The customer is responsible for specifying the product from the perspective
of the vehicle manufacturer and the end customer. This specification must
be unambiguous and comprehensible, such that it is clear what the supplier
has to do in order to meet the customer’s requirements regarding the prod-
uct.
8
The maturity of the delivered product and its production process can be
evaluated within the scope of project implementation according to VDA Ma-
turity Level Assurance for New Parts (MLA) and VDA Volume 2.
9
2 Objective and purpose
10
Figure 2: Added value of a standardized Component Requirements
Specification
The template already includes various aspects that are important and have
to be taken into account when it comes to describing to the supplier the re-
quirements regarding a specific component. The user can focus on the
component-specific parts of the technical specification.
All users are advised to check every project-specific aspect and to fully pre-
sent it in the description of requirements.
11
2.2.2 Added value for suppliers
12
3 General description and definition
13
The Component Requirements Specification provides the basis for the cus-
tomer to send an inquiry to the supplier as well as for the supplier to pre-
pare quotes and functional specifications.
The functional specification specifies the plans as to how all valid require-
ments in the Component Requirements Specification will be met1.
The functional specification describes HOW and WITH WHAT the require-
ments will be met. The functional specification does not constitute develop-
ment documentation, in which the solution is precisely described. Instead, it
only contains as much information as the customer needs in order to be
able to assess and evaluate the solution proposed by the supplier.
______________________________
1 see DIN 69905 “Procedure of Projects; Concepts“, VDI 2519 Blatt 1 “Procedures for the
compilation of tender and performance specifications”.
14
4 Application
The descriptions of the chapters in modules I+II provide the authors of the
Component Requirements Specification with important indications regard-
ing the requirements and system-levels which can be taken into account. In
the finished Component Requirements Specification, these descriptions
must be deleted.
15
Figure 4: Overview of the contents of module I
16
Figure 5: Structure of module II in the VDA Component Require-
ments Specification
17
5 Formulating precise requirements
The following quality criteria provide a guideline for formulating precise re-
quirements in order to ensure that they are of adequate quality in terms of
content.
18
Comprehensibility A requirement is comprehensible if it is de-
scribed in simple terms and can be understood
using the available information.
Clarity: Clarity means that there is only one possible in-
terpretation for each requirement.
Terms such as the ones in chapter 9.1 should
be avoided.
19
Requirements can result from an iterative process. However, they should
meet the above-mentioned quality criteria at the time of the first handover
to the supplier (“baseline”).
20
6 The Component Requirements Specification process in the supply
chain
The supplier (tier n) uses the customer’s requirements and their own re-
quirements to derive a requirement specification for their own supplier (tier
n+1).
21
Figure 8: The Component Requirements Specification process in the
supply chain
22
7 Requirements management with IT support
Thanks to the agreed-upon exchange format, the customer and the sup-
plier can update and coordinate requirements on a continuous basis.
23
8 VDA Component Requirements Specification standard structure
In this chapter, the requirements regarding project organization and the col-
laboration model between the customer and supplier must be defined.
Contents that are needed in order to outline the organization of the project
include, for example:
• Contact persons, interface matrix, responsibility assignment matrix
(e.g. RASCI chart)
• Collaboration model (e.g. VDA Maturity Level Assurance)
• Management of information for project communication and the use
of tools. Information security requirements, such as TISAX certifica-
tion, must be taken into account
• Organizational framework conditions such as panels, control pro-
cesses, project management plans
• Agile methods and project management actions
• Standards for documenting project work throughout the project
(e.g. meeting notes, status and progress reports, reviews, mile-
stone evaluations and project completion)
• Agreed-upon number of samples for the defined sample levels
In this chapter, responsibilities and escalation paths are specified for the
project. The component-specific requirements define the collaboration at
various levels of aggregation (construction, system integration, diagnosis,
construction of test vehicles, test drives - further details are possible, but
there should be no redundancies in relation to other requirements and
specifications (e.g. with regard to tests)). A list of contact persons on the
customer’s side (and on the supplier’s side, if known) can be added to the
information for the sake of completeness.
24
8.1.1.2 Feasibility
In this chapter, the requirements that the supplier must meet in order to
prove the feasibility of the project and the product are described. This re-
lates to the methods or criteria to be applied, e.g. technologies, deadlines,
capacities, skills, resources.
In this chapter, the most important information for project work, including
milestones, deadlines, communication and reporting are described (see
Maturity Level Assurance and project-specific planning on the part of the
customer).
• Schedule
Individual specification of a component-specific development and
testing schedule which is different from the master schedule due to
certain deviations (e.g. regarding long lead time components). Ref-
erence should also be made to a schedule that is valid for the en-
tire project (if available) in order to avoid redundancies in the indi-
vidual modules of the Component Requirements Specification.
• Sample
Definition of samples with regard to the condition at milestones,
deadlines and number of individual parts. When defining sample
levels, available standards must be referred to if required (see Ma-
turity Level Assurance for New Parts).
• Project completion
The project is completed after a successful PPA process and a
positive evaluation regarding the last milestone (see Maturity Level
Assurance for New Parts).
25
8.1.1.4 Specifications regarding the development method, the devel-
opment process, and collaboration
8.1.1.5 Confidentiality
Furthermore, general actions and methods for concept, product and pro-
cess assurance should be requested (e.g. FMEA, Maturity Level Assur-
ance, reviews).
26
8.1.3.1 Sustainability requirements
In this chapter, the requirements regarding the recycling concept for the
component are described. It is necessary to refer to existing legislation and
standards (e.g. VDA Volume 31, VDA 260 (Marking of Materials), ISO
22628 (Recyclability and recoverability), directives 2000/53 EG (End-of life
vehicles), and 761/2001/EG(EMAS)) in this chapter.
27
8.1.3.4 Disassembly concept
In this chapter, product safety requirements, such as those set out in ISO
26262, are described. The safety level for each individual requirement (e.g.
ASIL level) is specified in the technical requirements (module II).
28
8.1.8 Supply chain management
In this chapter, the requirements relating to the supply chain are described.
It should be ensured that the agreed-upon standards and methods are im-
plemented, applied and monitored accordingly by the supplier and in their
upstream supply chain (e.g. A-SPICE®, TISAX, cybersecurity require-
ments).
29
8.1.8.1 Contract management, including customer and project-spe-
cific requirements along the entire supply chain
30
• Tool
Tool to help with requirements management
Definition of interface and/or exchange format
Definition of contents and attributes / responsibilities
• Exchange process
Definition of the set of requirements to be exchanged, taking the
project schedule into account.
8.1.9 Releases
In this chapter, the requirements regarding the releases of the product and
the process are defined.
The supplier must provide all necessary proofs (e.g. homologation, testing,
capability) and certificates needed for production process and product ap-
proval (e.g. VDA Volume 2).
All of the necessary and agreed-upon releases must have been granted by
the time the product reaches series maturity.
31
8.1.11 Quality assurance
8.1.12 Requalification
In addition, all documents for which there are special obligations to main-
tain records, e.g. documents that are relevant to safety or certification, must
be listed (see VDA Volume 1 – Selection of documents with special archiv-
ing).
32
8.1.15 Configuration and variant management
33
8.1.20 Standard and carry-over parts
8.1.21 Logistics
In this chapter, the general requirements regarding the handling of test and
prototype tools are defined (ordering, development, and production of test
parts using prototype tools, costs, disposal, etc.).
34
8.2 Module II – Project and product-specific requirements
In this chapter, the overarching goals and the scope of the project are de-
fined (development, production, etc.). Moreover, the customer should de-
scribe what is not the goal of the project.
8.2.2 Traceability
______________________________
2 see Automotive SPICE® Guidelines 1st edition, September 2017, p. 34.
35
various levels. It should be clear which level/customer re-
quirement detailed customer requirements were derived
from.
It is advisable to agree on a traceability concept before the
start of the project and to include this concept in the collabo-
ration model.
In complex projects, traceability can only be ensured by us-
ing suitable tools.
All functions of the component are described in detail in the following chap-
ter.
36
Given that the scope of delivery may include multiple com-
ponents, the term “system” is used in the following sub-
chapters.
This information must be provided for all variants, e.g. countries, motors,
design.
In addition, the system’s acoustic, haptic and thermal requirements are de-
scribed (e.g. heat resistance, operating temperatures, storage tempera-
ture).
In this chapter, the system’s functional requirements are specified. The lat-
ter can also be grouped, e.g. according to functionality.
If the functionalities are described in separate requirement specifications
(e.g. diagnosis, network management), the latter must be referenced here.
In this chapter, interfaces between the system and the operating environ-
ment (e.g. value ranges for sensors, diagnosis, bus system) as well as
37
influences on the system are specified. When defining interfaces, efforts
should be made to specify precise limit values or tolerance ranges.
Among other things, electrical requirements regarding fluctuations in supply
voltage, overvoltage, system compatibility and operational stability are de-
scribed.
8.2.5.7 Mechanics
In this chapter, the requirements regarding the mechanics (including the ar-
chitecture and design) of a component are specified, e.g. with regard to:
38
• Feel and surface finish
• Geometry and packaging
• Design (fit, gap dimensions, radii, etc.)
• Construction and joining process, including specification of toler-
ances and measuring instructions (reference point system)
• Load requirements (maximum forces, pressure, alternating load,
predetermined breaking points, acceleration)
• Crash behavior
• Torsional stiffness and deformation
• Vibration behavior (resonance ranges in driving operation or vari-
ous driving conditions, natural frequencies of the component)
• Tightness
8.2.5.8 Electronics
39
8.2.5.11 Integration
In this chapter, requirements with regard to the type and scope of testing
and simulation are defined.
40
• Environmental factors
• Reliability and service life requirements
• Specific requirements regarding the target markets
• Testing in the vehicle
8.2.8.2 Scalability
8.2.8.3 Robustness
41
8.2.8.4 Reliability
The customer-specific service life requirements (e.g. service life of the vehi-
cle, mileage, software reliability requirements) regarding the component
should be described here.
8.2.8.5 Usability
This chapter outlines the product requirements which are meant to ensure
that the end user can operate the product. These requirements can include
effective, efficient, and intuitive operation as well as satisfaction with a par-
ticular context of use, e.g. infotainment or instrument clusters.
In this chapter, the service requirements that must be taken into account
during the development of the component are described, e.g.
• Operating and maintenance concept
• Repair concept (assembly/disassembly)
• Software updates
• Data protection
42
Furthermore, requirements regarding the maintenance of software quality
in case of software-based products or software as a product are described.
8.2.8.10 Logistics
43
9 Definitions, terms, abbreviations
Component Re-
Component Requirements Specification Module I -
quirements Speci-
Process and organization originated requirements
fication - Module I
Component Re-
Component Requirements Specification Module II
quirements Speci-
- Project and product-specific requirements
fication - Module II
Conformity of the produced vehicle with the ap-
Conformity proved vehicle type within the scope of homologa-
tion
Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only
EEprom
Memory
EMAS Environmental Management and Auditing Scheme
FMEA Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
GDPR General Data Protection Regulation
HW Hardware
ISO International Standards Organization
MISRA Motor Industry Software Reliability Association
OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer
QM Quality management
SW Software
44
9.1 Weak word list3
A a bit, a few, a little, a while, actually, against, ago, and, and when,
at, at all, at one time, about (like approx.), absolutely, any, any-
thing, anyone, anywhere, abundant, almost, advanced, among
other things, accomplished, accordingly, amazingly, absolutely, at
best, at first, at most, at times, at the time, at the same time, as if,
as of, as well, apparently, already, apparently, approximately, ap-
prox.
B bad, barely, because, but, by way of exception, better, best, best
possible,
C carefully, certain, certainly, currently, classic, clearly, close,
closely, conditionally, colossal, common, conceivably, contempo-
rary, countless, customary, customarily,
D depending on, differently, difficult, definitely,
E enough, especially, essentially, estimated, erstwhile, elementary,
every once in a while, extensively, extraordinarily, enormously,
entirely, even, exactly, exceedingly, extremely, etc.
F fantastic, far, fast, fabulous, fairly, few, for the most part, for the
time being, formerly, frequently, from anywhere, from time to time,
further,
G generally accepted, great, good
H hard, hastily, however, huge, hopefully
I if necessary, if need be, if possible, in case, in no case, in part, in
principle, in the near future, imperceptibly, incidentally, inconsider-
able, individually, innumerable, intuitively, incredibly, isolated,
J just,
L lately, less, likely, little, long, long ago, loud, light,
______________________________
3 see Dreher, Marion: „Konstruktive und analytische Methoden zur Qualitätssicherung von
Anforderungen in der Softwareentwicklung“. [Constructive and analytical methods for qual-
ity assurance in relation to software development requirements] Degree dissertation, Janu-
ary 2004)
45
M many times, mainly, maybe, meanwhile, moderately, more, more
or less, more often than not, moreover, multiple, most, mostly,
most likely, modern, much,
N nearly, next to, novel, now and then, not long ago, not quite, nu-
merous, never,
O one (someone), one day, overly, other, otherwise, operable, opti-
mal, only, only just, once, obviously, often, occasionally, or so,
P particular, persistently, perhaps, perfect, periodically, perplexing,
partly, partially, plausible, potentially, practically, pretty, presuma-
bly, possible, possibly, preferably, probably, promptly,
Q quiet, quite, quite a few,
R rather, rarely, really, recently, regular, remaining, roughly,
S several, several times, soon, sweeping, similarly, simply, seem-
ingly, simultaneously, slow, small, such as, some, sometimes,
something, somehow, someone, somewhere, self-explanatory,
surely, so, such, short, so to speak, specially, strongly
T temporarily, then, thus, tiny, to some extent, terrible, the other
day, to some extent, thoroughly, total, tremendous, tremendously,
U understandable, usual, usually,
V very, various,
W wide, well, wonders how, whole,
Y yes, yet,
46
Quality Management in the Automotive Industry
Reference:
Verband der Automobilindustrie e.V. (VDA)
Qualitäts Management Center (QMC)
Behrenstraße 35, 10117 Berlin
Phone +49 (0) 30 8978 42-235, Fax +49 (0) 30 8978 42-605
Email: info@vda-qmc.de, Website: www.vda-qmc.de