We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
William Parodi – 01220291001
ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS ABOUT THE READING ANALYZED “DEBIT
LITIGATION AND LABOR DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS”
1. ¿What does due process consist of on the occasion of the disciplinary
and sanctioning power held by the employer with respect to the worker? Due process in the context of the disciplinary and sanctioning power held by the employer over the worker consists of several key principles and procedural steps that must be followed to ensure fairness and legality. The employee must be formally notified of the disciplinary action being taken against them, including the specific conduct that is being questioned. The employer must consider any shortcomings in the employee's conduct and provide a provisional classification of the alleged disciplinary infractions. All evidence supporting the charges must be shared with the employee, allowing them to understand the basis of the accusations. The employee should be given a reasonable timeframe to present their defense, either orally or in writing, to contest the evidence against them. The competent authority must issue a final decision that is well-reasoned and consistent with the evidence and arguments presented. Any penalty imposed must be proportional to the infraction committed, ensuring that the punishment fits the nature and severity of the misconduct. The employee should have the right to challenge the decision through appropriate legal channels, ensuring that they can seek redress if they believe the process was flawed 2. Transferring concepts that are the subject of criminal law, to the disciplinary labor procedure ¿When is the principle of consistency violated? The principle of consistency, also known as the principle of congruence, is crucial in both criminal law and disciplinary labor procedures. It requires that the charges brought against an individual must align with the evidence and the sanctions imposed. In the context of disciplinary labor procedures, this principle is violated when there is a lack of alignment between the accusations made against an employee and the actual facts or evidence presented during the disciplinary process. According to the document, the Supreme Court of Justice emphasizes that there must be congruence between the accusations and the actual facts of the case. If the disciplinary authority imposes a sanction that does not correspond to the severity of the misconduct or if the charges are not clearly defined and substantiated, the principle of consistency is violated. Additionally, the document highlights that the disciplinary procedure must adhere to the established regulations and that any sanctions must be proportionate to the misconduct. If the sanctions are arbitrary or disproportionate, this can also constitute a violation of the principle of consistency 3. Ignorance of the fundamental right to due process or of any of the principles that comprise it, ¿What effects does it produce in labor disciplinary matters? The ignorance of the fundamental right to due process, or any of the principles that comprise it, can have significant effects in labor disciplinary matters. Invalidation of Sanctions: If due process is not observed, any sanctions imposed on an employee may be deemed invalid. This means that the disciplinary actions taken could be overturned, and the employee may not be held accountable for the alleged misconduct. Violation of Employee Rights: Ignoring due process principles can lead to violations of the basic rights of employees. This includes the right to a fair hearing, the right to be informed of the charges against them, and the right to present a defense. Such violations can result in legal challenges and claims of unfair treatment. Arbitrariness in Disciplinary Actions: Without adherence to due process, disciplinary actions may become arbitrary and capricious. This undermines the integrity of the disciplinary system and can lead to a lack of trust among employees regarding the fairness of the process. Legal Repercussions for Employers: Employers who fail to respect due process may face legal repercussions, including lawsuits or claims for damages from employees. This can also lead to reputational damage and a loss of employee morale. Increased Litigation: The absence of due process can result in increased litigation as employees seek to challenge disciplinary actions that they perceive as unjust. This can lead to prolonged disputes and additional costs for the employer
National Labor Relations Board v. J. K. Electronics, Inc., D/B/A Wesco Electrical Company, United Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers of America, (Ue), Intervenor, 592 F.2d 5, 1st Cir. (1979)
Class Action Complaint For Negligence, Products Liability and Punitive Damages Against Eli Lilly & Company and Novo Nordisk A/S Re Biosynthetic Human Insulin