Modular Sediment Barriers Instream
Modular Sediment Barriers Instream
INSTREAM PRACTICES
Symbol
Modular sediment barriers as discussed within this fact sheet are a modification of the
‘Sediment Weir’ technique presented within a separate fact sheet. It should be noted that
a patented design exists (‘WaterClean FilterBale’ by Star Water Solutions) for individual
modular units containing replaceable filter cartridges and wrapped in filter cloth.
Key Principles
1. Most filtration systems have only a limited ability to capture and retain clay-sized particles;
therefore, operators should not expect a significant change in the colour or clarity of water
passing through the structure, especially when working in clayey soils.
2. Sediment trapping is primarily achieved by the filtration of minor flows passing through the
structure, however, sedimentation may also occur within the settling pond formed by the
modular weir during high flows.
3. The critical design parameter for optimising particle settlement is the ‘surface area’ of the
settling pond. The hydraulic properties of the modular barrier are critical in achieving the
desired stage-discharge relationship to achieve optimum settling pond conditions.
4. The allowable flow rate through the modular barrier is governed by the maximum allowable
hydraulic head, the allowable flow rate per module, and the number of modules.
5. Sediment ‘filtration’ and gravity-induced ‘sedimentation’ can be improved by filling the
modular units with compost or special pollutant-adsorbing filter bags (e.g. ‘WaterClean
FilterBale’), or attach one or more filter tubes to the weir (Figure 4).
Design Information
The following design procedure may not always be applicable due to the absence of product-
specific head vs discharge relationships.
Design Procedure
1. Determine the primary design discharge (Q) for water passing through the modular barrier
just prior to flows overtopping the units (Figure 1). This is normally set equal to the expected
dry weather flow rate of the stream.
2. Determine the weir design discharge (QWEIR) for overtopping flows (Figure 2). The
appropriate design event may be set by the licence conditions (set by State or local
authority), otherwise choose a stream flood frequency of at least 10 times the expected
operational life of the structure, but at least a 1 in 1 year channel flow.
3. Determine the desirable settling pond surface area (As) from Table 1 based on the design
discharge (Q). Where practical, a critical particle size of 0.05mm should be chosen.
4. Determine the maximum allowable water level within the settling pond. This may be based
on-site constraints, or related to flooding and/or public safety issues.
5. Determine the required width of the modular barrier (W). The width (perpendicular to the
direction of flow) may be limited by site constraints, or controlled by the hydraulic
management of overtopping flows. The hydraulic analysis of overtopping flows is normally
based on weir equations—refer to the separate fact sheet ‘Chutes Part 1: General
Information’.
6. Select the required crest elevation of the modular barrier to achieve the desired settling
pond surface area. Ensure the weir crest is sufficiently below the maximum allowable water
elevation to allow for expected overtopping flows (possibly an iterative design step).
Operators should avoid circumstances where the instream settling pond needs to be
excavated (expanded) to achieve the required surface area as this can cause undesirable
channel damage.
7. Determine the maximum allowable head loss (ΔH) through the modular barrier. If flow
conditions downstream of the barrier are such that there is little or no backwater effects
during the design discharge (Q), then assume ΔH is equal to the height of the barrier (H).
If flow depths downstream of the modular barrier are expected to be significant, then the
maximum allowable head loss (ΔH) should be taken as the expected variation in water level
across the barrier during the design discharge.
8. Select an appropriate ‘design’ blockage factor (B.F.).
9. If the available pond surface area is insufficient to settle the required particle size, then the
efficiency of the sediment trap may be improved by incorporating additional filtration system
into the modular units or incorporating Filter Tubes (refer to Filter Tube Barriers) into the
structure. Note the filter tube intake pipes need to be set at an elevation above the expected
settled sediment depth.
10. Determine the rock size required for the splash pad downstream of the modular barrier.
Incorporating filter tubes into a modular sediment barrier (Figure 4) requires the modification of
some of the modular units to house the connection pipes; however, once modified, these units
can be reused on similar installations.
Figure 4 – Typical arrangement of filter tubes incorporated into a modular sediment trap
Settling pond:
Table 1 provides the required pond surface area per unit flow rate for various nominated ‘critical’
sediment particle sizes. The critical sediment particle size for a modular barrier may be
assumed to be 0.05mm unless otherwise directed. The chosen critical sediment size should
reflect the environmental values of the receiving water body and the expected weather
conditions.
Ideally, the settling pond should have a length (in the main direction of flow) at least three times
its average width. If the pond length is less than three times its average width, then the pond
area should be increase by 20% from the values presented in Table 1.
It is noted that achieving the minimum pond surface area may not be practical in all
circumstances, in which case a greater focus should be placed on the design of additional filter
medium and/or the incorporation of filter tubes (Figure 4).
Table 1 – Minimum settling pond surface area per unit inflow rate