Natural Hazards
Natural Hazards
Science Literacy
Teacher Guide
ISBN: 978-1-68380-793-3
*Please see full attribution at the back of this book for credited contributors to the
development and field testing of the OpenSciEd unit.
Trademarks and trade names are shown in this book strictly for illustrative and educational
purposes and are the property of their respective owners. References herein should not
be regarded as affecting the validity of said trademarks and trade names.
Natural Hazards:
Where do natural hazards happen, and how do we prepare for them?
Table of Contents
Unit Introduction Reading Collection 3: Minimizing Damage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
Unit Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Lesson 8: Which emergency communication systems are
Unit Storyline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 the most reliable in a hazard? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
Teacher Background Knowledge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Lesson 9: How can we model the systems put into place to protect
Learning Plans communities?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189
Reading: Science Literacy Routine, Preface. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Lesson 10: H ow can we effectively prepare our communities
Lesson 1: What happens to a community when a tsunami occurs? . . . . . . . . . . 23 for a natural hazard? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204
Lesson 2: Where do tsunamis happen and what causes them? . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 Reading Collection 4: Communities and Cooperation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222
Reading Collection 1: Types and Frequencies of Hazards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 Teacher Resources
Lesson 3: What causes a tsunami to form and move? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 Teacher Reference Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229
Lesson 4: How can we forecast where and when tsunamis will happen and Lesson-Specific Teacher Materials. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
which communities are at risk? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 Acknowledgments
Reading Collection 2: Forecasting the Unpreventable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Lesson 5: How can we reduce damage from a tsunami wave?. . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
Lesson 6: How are tsunamis detected and warning signals sent? . . . . . . . . . . 141
Lesson 7: What are ways we can communicate with people before and
during a tsunami? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153
Natural Hazards
Teacher Guide
Core Knowledge Science™ 6
BEFORE YOU BEGIN
UNIT STORYLINE
HANDS-ON/ VIDEOS OR COMPUTER
DATA SETS READINGS
Where do natural hazards happen, and how do we prepare for them? LAB ACTIVITIES IMAGES INTERACTIVES
Lesson Question Phenomena or Design Problem What we do and figure out How we represent it
LESSON 1 We read about and watch the 2011 tsunami triggered
3 days by an earthquake off the eastern coast of Japan, causing
devastating loss of life and structural damage. We develop
What happens to a
initial engineering ideas intended to detect tsunamis, provide
community when
warning of their approach, and reduce their impact. We think
a tsunami occurs?
about what makes some engineering ideas more promising or
Anchoring Phenomenon challenging than others. We brainstorm related natural hazards
and ask questions to generate a list of data and information we
need to better understand where these hazards occur and how
Triggered by a strong earthquake in we can prepare for them. We figure out:
the Pacific Ocean in 2011, a massive • A tsunami is a large wave that results from movement of
tsunami caused loss of life and the ocean floor.
damage to structures along Japan’s
• Tsunamis cause major flooding that damages homes and
entire east coast.
property and harms people in the community.
• Proposed solutions include a system of detection sensors,
warning plans, and design solutions to reduce damage.
Navigation to Next Lesson: We are wondering where tsunamis happen in the world, because knowing this can help us understand how those
communities can prepare for them.
Lab Safety Requirements for Science Investigations 3. Follow your Teacher Guide for instructions on disposing of waste materials
and/or storage of materials.
It is important to adopt and follow appropriate safety practices within the
context of hands-on investigations and demonstration, whether this is in 4. Secure loose clothing, remove loose jewelry, wear closed-toe shoes, and
a traditional science laboratory or in the field. In this way, teachers need to tie back long hair.
be aware of any school or district safety policies, legal safety standards, and 5. Wash your hands with soap and water immediately after completing this
better professional practices that are applicable to hands-on science activities activity.
being undertaken. 6. Never eat any food items used in a lab activity.
Science safety practices in laboratories or classrooms require engineering 7. Never taste any substance or chemical in the lab.
controls and personal protective equipment (e.g. wearing safety goggles,
non latex aprons and gloves, eyewash/shower station, fume hood, and fire Specific safety precautions are called out within the lesson using this
extinguishers). Science investigations should always be directly supervised by icon and a callout box.
qualified adults and safety procedures should be reviewed annually prior to
initiating any hands-on activities or demonstration. Prior to each investigation, What is the anchoring phenomenon and why was it chosen?
students should also be reminded specifically of the safety procedures that For the anchoring phenomenon, students read text and watch videos of
need to be followed. Each of the lessons within the units includes teacher the 2011 Great Sendai or Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami that occurred
guidelines for applicable safety procedures for setting up and running an off the east coast of Japan. This natural hazard caused great devastation to
investigation, as well as taking down, disposing of, and storing materials. Japan’s coastal communities despite the occurrence of tsunamis in this area
Prior to the first science investigation of the year, a safety acknowledgement throughout Japan’s history and the engineering preparation that had been
form for students and parents or guardians should be provided and signed. done in the area to protect communities. It provides a rich context in which
You can access a model safety acknowledgement form for middle school to investigate our abilities to forecast hazards and use engineering design
activities online. (see the Online Resources Guide for a link to this item) solutions and technologies to mitigate the effects of hazards. Importantly,
Disclaimer: The safety precautions of each activity are based in part on this phenomenon also highlights the importance of education and
use of the specifically recommended materials and instructions, legal communication with people for how to prepare and respond during a natural
safety standards, and better professional safety practices. Be aware that hazard.
the selection of alternative materials or procedures for these activities may Each unit’s anchoring phenomenon is chosen from a group of possible
jeopardize the level of safety and therefore is at the user’s own risk. phenomena after analyzing student interest survey results and consulting
with several external advisory panels. The tsunami hazard for this unit was
Please follow these lab safety recommendations for any lesson chosen for three reasons:
with an investigation: • Tsunami hazards build directly upon Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs) from
1. Wear safety goggles (specifically, indirectly vented chemical splash 4th grade in which students learned about physical waves. It advances
goggles), a non latex apron, and non latex gloves during the set-up, their understanding of mechanical waves by providing a much larger scale
hands-on investigation, and take down segments of the activity. phenomenon to investigate.
2. Immediately wipe up any spilled water and/or granules on the floor, as • Tsunami hazards also directly build upon Disciplinary Core Ideas from
this is a slip and fall hazard. grades 6-8 regarding geologic processes and changes in Earth’s surface in
Unit 6.4: What causes Earth’s surface to change? (Everest Unit), which comes
How is the unit structured? where, when, and why tsunamis happen and how they pose risk to certain
communities more so than others. Lessons 5-9 transition to focusing on
The unit is organized into two main lesson sets, each of which help make
engineering design solutions (structural, technological, and communication &
progress on a sub-question related to the driving question for the entire
education based systems) to mitigate the effects of tsunamis. Students apply
unit. Lessons 1-4 focus on developing science ideas about tsunamis, and
these ideas in a culminating project on another natural hazard event in
in particular focuses on developing key aspects of science ideas related to
Lesson 10.
Where does this unit fall within the Scope and Sequence? Finally, this unit is also designed to be taught after Unit 6.2: How can
containers keep stuff from warming up or cooling down? (Cup Design Unit),
This unit is designed to be taught just after Everest Unit in the Scope and
which means ideas about energy and energy transfer developed in that unit
Sequence. As such, it can leverage ideas about earth system processes that
can be leveraged in Lessons 3 and 5 of this unit. Lesson 2 of this unit also
cause motion in Earth’s crust and thus generate the release of energy to form
leverages prior ideas about causation and correlation that are developed in
a tsunami wave. The focal DCI for this unit pulls together ideas about where
the Everest Unit.
natural hazards are likely to occur based on “related geologic processes,”
which is the focus of the Everest Unit. What additional ideas will my students have or know from
Additionally, another prior unit, Unit 6.3: Why does a lot of hail, rain, or snow earlier grades or units?
fall at some times and not others? (Storms Unit), can provide science ideas for
students as they investigate other natural hazards in Lesson 9. Many of the In planning this unit, it builds upon ideas from earlier grades and units
hazards that affect US communities are meteorologically-driven hazards, such while also preparing students for ideas they will encounter in high
as hurricanes, flooding, storms, hail, droughts, and tornadoes. Students can school. As stated previously, the tsunami hazard was purposefully
bring forward ideas about air temperatures and precipitation patterns from chosen for this unit to leverage ideas from grades 3-5 and the previous
Storms Unit to bolster their final projects for the unit. Everest Unit.
This unit refers to two categories of academic language (i.e., vocabulary). Most the posted meaning of the word, students “own” the word—it honors their
often in this unit, students will have experiences with and discussions about use of language and connects their specific experiences to the vocabulary
science ideas before they know the specific vocabulary word that names that idea. of science beyond their classroom. It is especially important for emergent
After students have developed a deep understanding of a science idea through multilingual students to have a reference for this important vocabulary, which
these experiences, and sometimes because they are looking for a more efficient includes an accessible definition and visual support.
way to express that idea, they have “earned” that word and can add the specific Sometimes creating Word Wall cards in the moment is a challenge. The
term to the class Word Wall. These “words we earn” should be recorded on the teacher guide provides a suggested definition for each term to support
Word Wall using the students’ own definition whenever possible. On the other you in helping your class develop a student-friendly definition that is also
hand, “words we encounter” are “given” to students in the course of a reading, scientifically accurate. If you keep one Word Wall in your classroom for several
video, or other activity, often with a definition clearly stated in the text. Sometimes, sections of students, you might choose to record each class’s definition
words we encounter are helpful just in that lesson and need not be recorded on separately, and then propose an “official” definition to post the next day that
the Word Wall. However, if a word we encounter will be frequently referred to captures the collected meaning.
throughout the unit, it should be added to the Word Wall. As such, the Word Wall
becomes an ongoing collection of words we will continue to use, including all the The words we earn and words we encounter in this unit are listed in this
words we earn in the unit and possibly a few key words we encounter. document and in each lesson to help prepare and to avoid introducing a word
before students have earned it. They are not intended as a vocabulary list for
It is best for students if you create cards for the Word Wall in the moment, students to study before a lesson, as that would undermine the authentic
using definitions and pictorial representations that the class develops and lasting connection students can make with these words when they are
together as they discuss their experiences in the lesson. When they co-create allowed to experience them first as ideas they’re trying to figure out.
• Let students know that for the Science Literacy routine, they will read independently and then complete short
writing assignments. The reading selections relate to topics they will be exploring in their Natural Hazards unit
science investigations.
• The reading and writing will typically be completed outside of class (unless you have available class time to allocate).
• The first week’s reading is a short introductory segment in the book, and there is no accompanying writing exercise
as the unit is getting started.
• The class will discuss the reading together at the end of the week.
SUPPORT—The Preface with a scenario about a family deciding which of two cities to move to is written at
approximately Lexile 1100–1200, which leans toward the high end of the expected text complexity band for middle
school. You may wish to introduce a word identification and comprehension convention into your routine to support
struggling readers. Hang an envelope near the door with the label, “When we talk about the next reading selection,
I could use a little more help understanding the word(s). . . “ Encourage students, as they are reading, to jot words,
phrases, or sentences that they are unclear about onto small scraps of paper and tuck them into the envelope at any
time preceding the discussion of the reading. Whenever you facilitate class discussion about a reading selection, check
the envelope first, and layer in added examples and repeat definitions to help students build comprehension and
fluency for terms or complex sentences about which they have revealed they are uncertain.
Facilitate a brief class discussion about the Science Literacy Student Reader Preface, entitled “Put Yourself in This Scene.”
Student Reader
Pages 2–3
Suggested prompts Sample student responses
Preface
How would you summarize the “scene” referred to in the There is a family of four considering natural hazards and other
title? factors when deciding where to relocate.
A family lives in Chicago now and is discussing what factors should
influence a decision to move to Portland, OR, or Charleston, SC.
Restate the situation as an engineering problem to Which city is best for a family to move to, Portland, OR, or SUPPORT—If you are using the
solve. This means, reword it as a question. Charleston, SC? recommended word envelope
convention, check the envelope
What criteria did the family use to make their decision? winter climate to see if it contains any words,
food phrases, or sentences that students
risk to humans from natural hazards need help understanding. Read
key sentences aloud, and provide
pro sports teams concise explanation.
How could a U.S. map showing risk levels of several If they can find Portland, OR, and Charleston, SC, on the map,
natural hazards by county help the family make their they can compare the risk data for each kind of hazard. They
decision? could use these data to decide which city has fewer risks.
Dan and Emma mention “sea level rise.” How is it Sea level is rising because Earth’s climate is warming. Warmer
related to climate change? air means ice on land is melting and flowing into the ocean.
Also, warmer water takes up more space than colder water.
Is sea level rise a sudden event or gradual change? What Both. It is a slow or gradual change due to warming, but when
could be the risks to people? there is a very high tide or a tropical storm, that is a sudden
change.
Flooding affects homes and people’s ability to use roadways.
What other questions do you have about this scenario? Are there other natural hazards that the family has not
thought of?
Are there differences in risk depending on where in each city
they find a place to live?
Are there differences in risk depending on the type of structure
they move into?
What are the natural hazard risks in Chicago, where they live
now, compared to the other two cities?
KEY IDEA—Point out that, without a thorough analysis of scientific data from reputable sources on the likelihood of
natural hazards and learning how a community prepares for them, there isn’t really a way for this family to make an
informed decision about which of two cities will be the best one to relocate to. Both the investigations and the reading
selections in the unit ahead will help students advance to a place where they have more knowledge to apply to the
scenario, and they will circle back to the topic of how to make decisions about risks associated with natural hazards at
the end of the unit.
This Lesson In this lesson, we read about an earthquake in 2011 that occurred off the eastern coast of
Anchoring Phenomenon
Japan and triggered a tsunami. From the reading and photographs, we learn that when
a tsunami reaches land, it may result in catastrophic loss of life and property. Two video
3 days clips help us further explore how this phenomenon impacts people and structures. We
brainstorm and develop several engineering ideas to help detect tsunamis, provide
advance warning of their approach, and reduce their impact. While evaluating our
initial ideas, we notice patterns about what makes some engineering solutions more
promising or challenging than others. Finally, we brainstorm related phenomena (local
natural hazards) and ask questions to generate a list of data and information we need to
better understand where natural hazards occur and how we can prepare for them.
A tsunami just reaching Miyako, Japan.
Next Lesson We will investigate patterns in historical tsunami data and figure out that most tsunamis are caused by strong, shallow earthquakes on
colliding plate boundaries. We will establish a cause-and-effect relationship and use it to forecast locations at risk for future tsunamis.
3 10 min SHARE NOTICINGS AND WONDERINGS D Notice and Wonder poster, markers
The class shares noticings and wonderings from the reading,
photographs, and video clips.
4 10 min INITIAL ENGINEERING IDEAS E-F Tsunami: Japan 2011
Brainstorm ideas around technologies for detecting tsunamis, warning
people, and reducing damage due to tsunamis.
5 15 min SHARE INITIAL IDEAS AND NAVIGATION G-I Tsunami: Japan 2011
Through a series of paired Initial Ideas Discussions, students each share
one developed engineering idea to detect tsunamis, warn people, or
reduce the damage caused.
End of day 1
6 1 min NAVIGATION J Tsunami: Japan 2011
Gather in a Scientists Circle to share initial ideas for detecting tsunamis,
warning people, or reducing damage.
7 10 min SHARE INITIAL ENGINEERING IDEAS J Tsunami: Japan 2011, Detect Tsunamis poster, Warn
Share and record students’ initial engineering ideas, classifying them as People poster, Reduce Damage poster, markers
designs intended to detect tsunamis, warn people about their approach,
or reduce the damage they cause.
LESSON 1 NATURAL HAZARDS | 24
Part Duration Summary Slide Materials
8 20 min EVALUATE INITIAL ENGINEERING IDEAS K Tsunami: Japan 2011, Detect Tsunamis poster, Warn
Individually and in class discussion, identify engineering ideas that show People poster, Reduce Damage poster, markers,
promise or may be challenging to implement. optional: small stickers, sticky notes
9 8 min NAVIGATE TO RELATED PHENOMENA L Tsunami: Japan 2011, World Map (from Everest Unit)
Consider related phenomena and connect the anchoring phenomenon
to local natural hazards. Begin thinking about how we might design and
evaluate engineering solutions for natural hazards in general.
10 10 min DISCUSS RELATED PHENOMENA M-N Tsunami: Japan 2011, Local Hazards poster,
Share examples of local natural hazards and discuss examples of technologies Technologies or Related Solutions poster, markers
used to detect, warn people, or reduce the damage of those hazards.
11 2 min ASSIGN HOME LEARNING O
Assign students to learn more about their family’s experience and
knowledge around natural hazards.
End of day 2
12 5 min NAVIGATION TO STUDYING NATURAL HAZARDS P Tsunami: Japan 2011, Local Hazards poster,
Briefly review the home learning in partners and as a class to preface a Technologies or Related Solutions poster, markers
discussion of how we study natural hazards and design solutions.
13 10 min CONNECT STUDYING NATURAL HAZARDS TO DESIGNING SOLUTIONS Q Tsunami: Japan 2011, Local Hazards poster,
Revisit related phenomena to generate ideas for how we might study Technologies or Related Solutions poster, markers
natural hazards and design solutions.
14 8 min DEVELOP QUESTIONS FOR THE DRIVING QUESTION BOARD R 2-3 sticky notes, markers, Tsunami: Japan 2011,
Develop questions for the DQB about the 2011 Japan tsunami, related Detect Tsunamis poster, Warn People poster, Reduce
phenomena, and ways to reduce the impacts of these natural hazards. Damage poster, Local Hazards poster, Technologies
or Related Solutions poster
15 25 min DEVELOP THE DRIVING QUESTION BOARD S-T questions written on sticky notes, Tsunami: Japan 2011,
Convene a Scientists Circle to construct the DQB around students’ questions, Detect Tsunamis poster, Warn People poster, Reduce
organized into categories. Develop the unit question through class discussion. Damage poster, Local Hazards poster, Technologies or
Related Solutions poster, DQB, markers
16 10 min BRAINSTORM IDEAS FOR INVESTIGATION AND INFORMATION WE NEED U Ideas for Investigation and Information We Need
As a class, create an Ideas for Investigation and Information We Need poster, DQB, markers
poster and record thoughts on how to figure out the answers to our initial
questions as we move forward.
LESSON 1 NATURAL HAZARDS | 25
Part Duration Summary Slide Materials
17 2 min NAVIGATION DQB
As students reflect on the DQB, offer a suggestion for the next step.
End of day 3
Review teacher guide, slides, and teacher references or keys (if applicable).
Make copies of handouts and ensure sufficient copies of student references, readings, and procedures are available.
Test the Japan Coast Guard Tsunami Footage video. (See the Online Resources Guide for a link to this item. www.
coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources)
Materials: Tsunami: Japan 2011, science notebook, World Map (from Everest Unit) *Attending to Equity
Introduce the phenomenon. Say something like, I want to share some Supporting Universal Design for
information with you about a phenomenon that impacts places where Learning: In this unit, Constructing
many people live. When it happens, structures can be damaged and people Explanations and Designing
can be hurt, or even die, as a result. This phenomenon is called a tsunami. Solutions is a focal SEP. Therefore,
Has anyone heard of this before? numerous scaffolds exist to
Let students share a few initial ideas with the class. support students in this practice
in the context of natural hazards.
Introduce the reading and photographs. Project slide A. Tell If you believe your students are
students that the slide shows a tsunami wave reaching the eastern ready to proceed with less support,
coast of Japan in 2011. Say, We have a reading that talks about events that we recommend first removing
occurred in Japan and Indonesia. It might be helpful to know where these scaffolding related to practices
places are. Can someone show us Japan and Indonesia on the map? that are not focal in this unit. For
Have a volunteer point out the approximate locations of Japan and example, though modeling is
Indonesia on the World Map. Use sticky notes or some other method to used in many activities, it is likely
mark them for reference throughout the unit (see reference map with a familiar practice, as students
arrows showing Japanese and Indonesian islands). have engaged with it in previous
units. Therefore, consider asking
Distribute a copy of Tsunami: Japan 2011 to each student.
students to generate their own
models without offering them
Additional Guidance supplemental image starters
or handouts (often provided
Supporting empathy and emotions: A unit on natural hazards is likely to elicit emotional stress from some students, throughout this unit). However,
whether from their empathy for those affected or from experiencing a natural hazard directly or through the take caution when removing
experiences of family and friends. scaffolding, as it is designed to
Emotional stress from a disaster can often be great in students who feel they do not understand the situation or have ensure greater access and to help
no control over it. Although natural hazards often bring impacts that students cannot control, the aim of this unit is to remove barriers to understanding
help students consider what is happening before, during, and after such events, and to empower them to use what complex phenomena.
they learn to respond in ways that can keep them and their loved ones safe in the event of a disaster.
If you have students who have traumatic experiences from natural hazards, a recommended source is the CDC’s Caring
for Children in a Disaster website. (See the Online Resources Guide for a link to this item. www.coreknowledge.org/
cksci-online-resources)
Read text and examine photos. Give students 5 minutes to complete Part 1 of their handout individually by
reading the text, examining the photographs, and marking things they notice or wonder about.*
Set up a Notice and Wonder chart. Present slide B. Have students find a blank page • Over 10,000 people died, many of them carried away by fast-moving water.
• Over 100,000 buildings totally collapsed.
on the left side of their science notebooks and title the page, “Tsunami Phenomenon.”
• Over 1 million households were left without fresh water for over a week.
Prior to the 2011 tsunami in Japan, Indonesia experienced a tsunami on December 26, 2004, triggered by a
9.2-magnitude earthquake in the Indian Ocean. The Indonesian tsunami generated waves as high as 100 feet (30 m)
Then, have them make a two-column chart to record their noticings (left column) and
and killed approximately 227,000 people in 14 different countries along the shorelines of the Indian Ocean, including
more than 126,000 in Indonesia.
tsunami. At this point, the term
wonderings (right column) from the reading and photographs. magnitude should be included on
the Word Wall as a “word from a
Give students 1-2 minutes to record in this chart what they noticed and wondered
1
previous unit.”
about from the reading and photographs. Tell them we will share noticings and
CKSci_G6U5_SWP.indd 1 25/10/22 10:52 AM
Additional Guidance
The reading contains technical words that you may want to discuss with your students before they begin reading, or
pause to discuss as they encounter them in the text. A word we earn is one we work together to understand through
investigation and collaborative sensemaking, thus we celebrate our growing understanding by adding it to the wall. A
word we encounter may be introduced through text or other media and is often defined for us. If our understanding of
this word grows during the lesson or unit, we can then consider that word one that we earn. This unit will also include
words from previous units as students revisit some words from the Everest Unit, which might be helpful to put back on
the Word Wall so students can apply them in another context.
Science Notebook
This is the unit’s first use of the science notebook. Students may need time to organize a new section. The
setup will vary depending on how you’ve structured the notebook’s components. It is recommended to
have students do the following:
• Reserve a blank page at the start of the unit, to be titled with the unit question on day 3 of this lesson.
• After the title page, reserve 2 pages (4 pages front-to-back) for the table of contents (unless all tables of
contents are at the front of the notebook).
• Reserve 10 pages (20 pages front-to-back) for the Progress Tracker. (This is optional for this unit.)
• Number the pages so everyone begins the unit on the same page number.
Remind students that the notebook is their tool for recording their observations, evidence, and ideas to share with the
classroom community. They should see it as a space to brainstorm and record their thinking, as well as a place to show
how their thinking changes as they learn more.
LESSON 1 NATURAL HAZARDS | 30
2. Watch tsunami video. 8 min
Materials: science notebook, computer, projector, 6.5 - Lesson 1 Japan Coast Guard Tsunami Footage (See the Online
Resources Guide for a link to this item. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources)
Additional Guidance
Supporting empathy and emotions: We have elected to present information and photos from the 2011 Japan
tsunami before showing actual video footage as a way to prepare students for viewing a potentially disturbing natural
event. Though many people were killed during this event, we have taken care to select footage that does not show
any people suffering or in visible distress. We do not feel it is necessary to show sensitive footage of human death and
suffering for students to engage with the unit’s goals.
However, some students may have experienced this type of hazard firsthand or have a relative or friend who has
experienced a tsunami. The videos might also elicit negative emotions from students who have experienced loss
from other natural hazards. If students would prefer not to watch the videos, it will not take away from their learning
experience. It might also be helpful to encourage students by pointing out that we can improve how well we protect
people by learning more about how these events happen.
Prepare students to see tsunami videos. Project slide C. Before presenting the tsunami videos, prepare your
students by reminding them of the information in their prior reading about how this event caused devastating loss of
life and physical damage.
Although your students may not have experienced a tsunami, point out that some of them may have experienced
other natural hazards or have close family or friends who have been affected by such events. Explain that, though we
may not be able to stop these events, we can use science to understand them better, predict when they may occur,
and make more informed decisions about what to do when they happen.
For further guidance on what to say to your students before viewing this phenomenon, please refer to the Guidance
callout; for guidance on supporting student reactions and experiences with natural hazards, see the Guidance callout.
Additional Guidance
Supporting empathy and emotions: Viewing natural hazard events may cause anxiety for some students, as they
feel helpless in the face of devastating natural events. To help prepare your students to view natural hazards, such as
the tsunami, consider how you may use aspects of the following script:
In previous units we’ve thought a lot about natural processes that occur on Earth. By looking at data, we’ve been able to
better understand why certain events occur and even predict, to some degree, when and how they will happen in the future.
However, because our models are not perfect, they cannot yet account for every natural event. Sometimes, unforeseen events
are devastating for those who live through them, as they may lose loved ones and experience dramatic changes in their daily
lives. It’s also important to realize that for some, just watching or reading about these events can be equally difficult. Even
without experiencing a natural hazard, we can imagine what it might feel like to live through something so powerful and
seemingly unpredictable, or to lose someone close. It’s easy to feel scared or worried.
Additional Guidance
The video clips document the 2011 Japan tsunami. We want students to understand how a particular event affected
specific locations. We also want students to notice that a tsunami involves not only a large wave, but more importantly,
a dramatic increase in water flow, resulting in flooding. Finally, we want students to consider how the event could be
predicted or damage be reduced.
There are many other video clips of global tsunamis available. You may consider whether to show other tsunami
events at a later date should students have questions about how tsunamis behave more generally and need to explore
further evidence. However, we recommend selecting video clips that highlight the tsunami event itself without
showing people suffering bodily harm.
Give students 1-2 minutes to make notes in their Notice and Wonder chart. For 1 minute, have students turn and talk
with a partner about their noticings and wonderings from the videos.
Building towards: 1.A Ask questions that arise from careful observations of a sudden natural event that causes
damage to communities.
This is the first point in this lesson that you can assess students on this lesson-level performance expectation. You can
also assess students’ initial questions on day 2 as the class constructs the Local Hazards poster and the Technologies or
Related Solutions poster, or on day 3 as the class constructs the DQB.
What to look for/listen for: Observations or questions about (1) size or speed of tsunamis or type of damage to
communities, (2) disagreement or uncertainty about what causes tsunamis, (3) disagreement or uncertainty about why
a tsunami possesses such destructive power, and (4) how communities could be protected from tsunamis.
What to do: Encourage students to share their observations and related questions from the reading and videos.
Prompt them by asking Where did you see that happen? and What kinds of questions do you have about ____?
Building towards: 1.B Apply scientific ideas to design an object, tool, process, or system that detects a tsunami when
it starts (cause) and warns people, or reduces damage to communities (effect).
This is the first point in this lesson that you can assess students on this lesson-level performance expectation. You can
also assess students on day 2 as they discuss promising and challenging aspects of designs, and on day 3 when the
class discusses how to design solutions to reduce the impact of natural hazards on communities.
What to look for/listen for (in the initial designs):
• At least one drawing or written description of an idea to either help detect tsunamis, give people more advance
warning, or help reduce the damage caused by tsunamis.
• Ideas that indicate a characteristic of the tsunami wave that would be important to consider in the design, such as
the start of the hazard (e.g., earthquake); or how fast, big, or intense the wave becomes; or a method for blocking
the wave from reaching a community.
Throughout Lesson 1, look for/listen for these things: (1) agreement that though tsunamis may cause devastation,
their effects can be reduced by solutions that detect, warn people, and reduce damage; (2) agreement that some
engineering solutions may be more promising or challenging than others; and (3) uncertainty or disagreement about
what makes one solution more promising or challenging than another.
What to do: If your students struggle to think of engineering ideas, ask them to consider what might be dangerous
about the giant waves reaching land. Use a physical analogy to help them recognize the weight of water: Ask whether
they think water is heavy or light. Fill a 5-gallon bucket or similar container with water and ask a student to pick it up.
Ask them what it might feel like to get hit by that much water. Remind them that a tsunami wave carries millions of
times more water than the bucket. Remind them of the cars, airplanes, and helicopters they saw swept away during
the second video clip.
End of day 1
6. Navigation 1 min
All the activities on day 2 can be completed in a Scientists Circle. Day 2 gives students opportunities to not only share
ideas but also begin evaluating ideas—an integral part of engineering. As students may be new to this process, it is
important for them to practice this together in a public format that positions their ideas at the center of the discussion.
When students need to complete activities with partners, they can work with a classmate sitting next to them in the
circle to minimize the moving of chairs and desks.
Materials: Tsunami: Japan 2011, Detect Tsunamis poster, Warn People poster, Reduce Damage poster, markers
Elicit ideas and record on class posters. Keep slide J displayed. Say, Last class you shared ideas with each other about
how to protect people and communities from tsunamis. Refer to what
you recorded in Parts 2 and 3 of your handout as we collect these ideas Technologies to help detect Technologies to give people Technologies that could
a tsunami more advance warning that a help reduce the damage
on a class poster. Think back to one that you got really excited about. It tsunami is approaching from a tsunami
Materials: Tsunami: Japan 2011, Detect Tsunamis poster, Warn People poster, Reduce Damage poster, markers,
*Supporting Students in
optional: small stickers, sticky notes
Engaging in Argument from
Shift to evaluating engineering ideas. Display only the first two prompts on slide K. Say, Part of engineering is Evidence
coming up with new ideas to solve problems. However, engineers also use their expertise to evaluate a plan that’s already This is an opportunity to support
being used or one that has been proposed. As part of their evaluation, they ask, “Does this idea show promise?” or “Does this students in developing productive
idea seem challenging?” So, let’s try that with our ideas. argumentation practices. Remind
Prompt students to turn to Part 4 of their handout. Tell them to individually write down the idea they think shows the them of classroom norms
most promise and explain their rationale; then, to write down the idea that seems most challenging to implement and around discussing or critiquing a
explain why. Give students 5 minutes to complete these prompts. classmate’s idea. Emphasize that
Additional Guidance
During this discussion, when students disagree on an idea, ask for clarification on why some think an idea is
promising and why others think it may be challenging. You can add notes on the posters to help students notice how
complicated the evaluation process can be and how it’s important to consider multiple perspectives. Say, What may
seem promising to one person may seem challenging to another. So it’s critical that we understand the “why” in these cases
especially. I’ll write some notes on the poster to indicate which ideas we may need to think about more. Maybe we’ll need
more information in order to determine whether that idea is promising or challenging.
Also, a student may feel bad if their idea is considered a “challenging” solution by their peers. It’s important in these
cases for both sides to explain their reasoning. However, allowing the student who came up with the idea to have
the last word may be effective, as they have a chance to acknowledge the perspectives of their peers as well as an
opportunity to ask for clarification of anything said.
This is an important moment to highlight why it’s so important to hear multiple perspectives when it comes to
engineering design and that real engineers go through a similar process. Push your students to think that variety in
ideas is what we strive for, because if everyone has similar solutions for such a complex problem, then it’s likely that
certain needs or limitations will get overlooked. For example, if we all like the idea of building a massive tsunami wall
to protect the shoreline, what happens when there aren’t enough resources to build the wall?
For the next 5 minutes, ask students if they notice any patterns in the evaluated ideas. Say, Do you notice any patterns
when you look at all the promising ideas? What if we look at only the challenging ideas? Do any patterns emerge?
Key Ideas
Purpose of this discussion: To identify patterns in what makes some engineering ideas more promising or
challenging than others. As students may be unfamiliar with tsunamis or with evaluating engineering designs by
considering criteria and constraints, responses during this discussion will vary. Listed below are some patterns which
students may notice. However, it’s important at this point not to point these out. They will likely emerge as students
progress through the storyline in this unit. At the end of the discussion, return to the ideas that we reached consensus
around (e.g., this group of solutions may be easier to deploy quickly, these may be cheaper, these may save more lives
or protect more property, and so forth). Take this opportunity to introduce the terms criteria and constraints that can be
used to evaluate solutions for tsunamis and related phenomena. This will encourage students to think about tsunamis
from an engineering perspective, and may support them in asking more engineering-related questions when they
construct the DQB.
Listen for these ideas:
• Most of the promising ideas involved warning people of an approaching tsunami because these solutions seem to
cost less money or use fewer resources.
• Many of the ideas around detecting tsunamis seem promising because they use technologies that already exist, like
using tools to detect earthquakes.
• It seems like reducing the damage caused by a tsunami will be challenging because that involves building
something new, and that requires lots of time and money.
LESSON 1 NATURAL HAZARDS | 38
Discuss the need for more information. Say, Sometimes deciding whether an idea is promising or challenging is difficult,
as we see with our list. Take a moment to turn and talk with a partner about the question on the slide: “What do we still need
to know about these designs or the hazard itself?”
Display the third prompt on slide K. Read it aloud and ask students to think about what additional information we
may need to further evaluate these designs. Give them 1 minute to think alone before sharing with a partner 1 minute.
Finally, give students 3 minutes to share their ideas with the class. Say, If we can understand more about the process
engineers use to design and evaluate their plans, then perhaps we can apply a similar process when examining natural
hazards that happen closer to us. To help us do this, whenever we come up with an idea or research a possible solution, let’s
continue to ask what makes this solution promising or challenging.
Materials: Tsunami: Japan 2011, World Map (from Everest Unit) *Attending to Equity
Transition to related phenomena. Display slide L. Explain to students that although the focus of this unit has been a Supporting Emergent
tsunami in Japan, scientists and engineers study other natural hazards and design ways to better detect, warn people, Multilingual Students: Asking
and reduce damage. Say, Now that we’ve spent a few days looking at and analyzing information about tsunamis, let’s think students to consider related natural
about what other types of natural hazards can affect people and places too. And then let’s think about whether we know hazards may help you situate
of any technologies for detecting local hazards, or for warning people that a hazard is about to occur. What other natural the anchor in a local context. By
hazards have you heard of or experienced? helping to make connections
between the tsunami and events
Connect to related phenomena.* Ask students to turn and talk to a neighbor about natural hazards they’ve
your students are likely to have
experienced, been affected by, have read or heard about, or are simply interested in. Give them 2 minutes to discuss.
experienced, or could experience in
Prompt students to individually list other natural hazards in Part 5 of their handout. Give them 2 minutes to complete their own community, you provide
their response. opportunities for them to engage
Connect to local hazards. Display slide M. Say, In the last unit we noticed that earthquakes tend to happen more in more meaningful sensemaking,
frequently in certain places. Does anyone remember where? Call on a volunteer to show the locations on the World Map especially if they are permitted to
and explain that earthquakes tend to occur most frequently along the boundaries of plates on Earth’s surface. Say, This demonstrate their understanding
means that communities in those areas are more at risk for experiencing an earthquake. in a language of their choosing. As
you do this, keep in mind students’
Ask students to think about which natural hazards are more likely to happen in their communities, and whether there cultures and languages, as this will
are things they know about those hazards that may help us think about designing solutions for the tsunami hazard. help make the experience more
Give them 4 minutes to individually complete the remaining prompts in Part 5. Remind them to be prepared to share accessible to your students.
these ideas and examples with the class.
Materials: Tsunami: Japan 2011, Local Hazards poster, Technologies or Related Solutions poster, markers
Construct Local Hazards poster and Technologies or Related Solutions poster. Display slide N. Remind students
of what we have done in this lesson so far. Say, So far, we’ve learned about a tsunami that occurred in Japan in 2011. Then,
we brainstormed ideas to detect tsunamis, warn people, and reduce the damage caused by tsunamis. We evaluated some
Additional Guidance
Students’ responses about local hazards and examples of technologies will vary widely by location. Within the time
permitted, accept as many responses as possible without probing too much for specificity. Even if a response seems
vague, incomplete, or only partially accurate, record it. This is a moment to engage prior knowledge and experiences,
not to evaluate students’ ideas. Students will have opportunities to rethink some of these ideas in light of new
information later in the unit.
Materials: None
*Attending to Equity
Assign home learning to connect with family resources. Display slide O. Invite students to think more about This home learning opportunity
natural hazards when they go home. Prompt them to talk with family members (preferably older ones, who are more will help students broaden their
likely to have experienced a natural hazard) to learn more about the hazards they have experienced.* thinking to related phenomena
Say, For home learning, share what we’ve learned about tsunamis with your family, and then ask if they have heard of or beyond the case of the 2011 Japan
experienced any other natural hazards. It will be helpful to hear about their experiences and what they learned from them. tsunami. Even if family members
Ask your family members if they remember when they first experienced the hazard and how they learned about what to live far away and have experienced
do when it happened. Hearing from different people may give us more ideas about how to help people and communities very different natural hazards, it is
prepare and then act when a hazard occurs. important that students hear from
people they know and trust about
how they learned about these
hazards and what to do when they
occur. This broadening to related
phenomena will give students
an opportunity to leverage their
family’s resources to augment
their classroom learning, making
the anchoring phenomenon more
personally meaningful. There is an
additional opportunity to add to this
home learning as part of Lesson 2.
End of day 2
Materials: Tsunami: Japan 2011, Local Hazards poster, Technologies or Related Solutions poster, markers
Turn and talk about the home learning assignment. Display slide P. Give students 2 minutes to talk with a partner
about the slide’s home learning prompts. Meanwhile, display the Local Hazards poster and Technologies or Related
Solutions poster where all students can view them.
Frame the discussion about studying natural hazards and designing solutions. Remind students that after
learning about the 2011 Japan tsunami, they brainstormed ideas to help people and communities affected by natural
hazards. Say, Now that we’ve asked other people about their experiences with natural hazards, we can use what they shared
to help us think about how to design ways to protect people and places in the future. Let’s take a few minutes and hear what
some of you learned from talking with your families.
Ask for a few volunteers and give them 3 minutes to share their home learning experiences with the class.
Additional Guidance
Record students’ ideas on the appropriate posters using a different color marker than previously (to highlight the new
additions from home learning). These posters can be used later in the unit to motivate discussions around the criteria
and constraints for engineering solutions. Specifically, during Lesson 5, students can think more about criteria and
constraints for solutions to other hazards based on how they were discussed in the context of tsunamis. Also, during
Lesson 10, students can revisit this discussion to think about which hazard they want to study more deeply.
Materials: Tsunami: Japan 2011, Local Hazards poster, Technologies or Related Solutions poster, markers
Facilitate whole-class discussion about studying natural hazards and designing solutions. Briefly revisit
the Local Hazards poster and Technologies or Related Solutions poster to remind the class of what was discussed
previously.
Display slide Q. Give students 3 minutes to discuss the prompts on the slide with their neighbor.
For the next 7 minutes, prompt students to share their responses with the class. Remind them to draw from their home
learning when appropriate.
The idea here is for students to connect their thinking around tsunamis specifically to natural hazards more broadly.
It’s important to help them connect why and how we might study the 2011 Japan tsunami with how we might study
natural hazards that affect other communities in order to develop a method for evaluating solutions designed to
reduce their impact.
Materials: 2-3 sticky notes, markers, science notebook, Tsunami: Japan 2011, Detect Tsunamis poster, Warn People *Supporting Students in
poster, Reduce Damage poster, Local Hazards poster, Technologies or Related Solutions poster Engaging in Asking Questions
Prepare to set up the DQB. Display slide R. Say, We have lots of questions about tsunamis and we have ideas about how and Defining Problems
to reduce their impact. We also have ideas and questions about other natural hazards, including the things we learned from Initial questions about a
our families. To set up our DQB for this unit, it may be useful to have two categories for our questions. One category is questions phenomenon are intended to
about tsunamis or other natural hazards. The second category is questions about engineering designs for any of those hazards. clarify what information is known
You can generate questions in both categories. Record them on sticky notes with a marker—one question per sticky note. After and not known; there are often
a few minutes, we’ll quickly review our questions in partners and then get together in a Scientists Circle to create our DQB. more questions than answers
Write questions individually.* Pass out 2-3 sticky notes to each student and give them 4 minutes to review their when scientists begin their
notebooks and handouts to generate questions. Remind them that questions can be related to tsunamis or the investigations. Develop a safe and
engineering solutions designed to reduce their impact as well as to other natural hazards or how engineers design and supportive space for students’
evaluate solutions for those. uncertainty, and focus on the need
to ask and answer questions in
order to address this uncertainty,
Additional Guidance which may require the entire unit
to resolve.
Encourage students to generate at least one question related to tsunamis or a local natural hazard and at least one
question about engineering designs for natural hazards so their questions will be represented on both aspects of
the DQB. It might be helpful to take two passes through the DQB (see Alternate Activity callout in next step) to first
generate questions about hazards and then generate questions about engineering designs, encouraging students to
participate during each pass.
Materials: questions written on sticky notes, Tsunami: Japan 2011, science notebook, Detect Tsunamis poster, Warn *Supporting Students in
People poster, Reduce Damage poster, Local Hazards poster, Technologies or Related Solutions poster, DQB, markers Engaging in Asking Questions
Gather in a Scientists Circle. Display slide S. Instruct students that when their questions are ready, they and Defining Problems
need to bring them along with their handout, science notebook, and a chair to meet in a Scientists Circle Students share and organize
around the DQB. their questions, look/listen for
Explain to students how you will create the DQB: questions about the tsunami in
Japan specifically, about tsunamis
• The first student reads their question aloud to the class, then posts it in general, and about other
on the DQB, near the part of the model the question most relates to. natural hazards occurring around
• Students who are listening should raise their hand if one of their the world. Similarly, students
questions relates to the question that was just read aloud. will likely generate questions
• The first student selects the next student whose hand is raised. about engineering solutions that
involve detecting, warning people,
• The second student reads their question, says why or how it relates,
and reducing damage caused
and posts it near the question it most relates to on the DQB.
by tsunamis and other natural
• The student selects the next student, who may have a related hazards.
question or a new question.
Look/listen for questions that are
• We will continue until everyone has at least one question on the DQB. Example format. open-ended (e.g., why, how) and
focus on either tsunamis specifically
Alternate Activity (e.g., How does the wave form?
What happens when it reaches
This activity asks students to consider tsunamis, other natural hazards, and engineering solutions related to both, but a community?) or other hazards
it may be difficult for students to develop questions for these categories simultaneously. However, as they will make more generally (e.g., Do all hazards
sense of information regarding natural hazards in order to design or evaluate engineering solutions in this unit, it is happen that fast? How do people
important that they have opportunities to practice thinking about and developing questions for each category. know when a hazard is about to
To support students in this, we suggest two options for building the DQB. impact their community?). If you
notice close-ended questions,
Option A - Single-pass DQB:
encourage the student to rephrase
• Students focus on questions about tsunamis and other natural hazards. the question so that it cannot be
• Then, students focus on questions about engineering solutions for those natural hazards. answered with a simple yes or no.
• Finally, students bring all their questions to build the DQB.
Option B - Double-pass DQB:
• Students focus on questions about tsunamis and other natural hazards.
• Then, students build the first half of the DQB using the tsunami and natural hazards questions (first pass).
LESSON 1 NATURAL HAZARDS | 43
• Students focus on questions about engineering solutions for tsunamis and other natural hazards.
• Finally, students build the second half of the DQB around the engineering solutions questions (second pass).
In either approach, the aim is to support students as they consider a complex phenomenon from multiple
perspectives.
Build the DQB and organize questions into categories. Display slide T, which shows the suggested format for
the DQB. As students share, questions will naturally start clustering into groups such as (but not limited to) science
questions related to hazards’ causes, locations, and frequency of occurrence, as well as engineering questions related
to cost, available resources, and what solutions are already being used. Give students approximately 20 minutes to
share and add questions to the DQB.*
When students finish sharing and placing questions on the DQB, have them look at the board for any additional
organization that can be done. Once all the questions have been organized, ask students to consider the relationship
between the “Science” and “Engineering” categories. Say, If we look at our questions, what link do we notice between our
science and engineering questions? How will figuring out our questions about the hazards (science) help us design (engineer)
ways to protect people and places? How would you describe the connection between science and engineering?
After a number of students share and agree on at least one connection between the science and engineering
questions, draw a thick arrow connecting “Science” to “Engineering.” Label the arrow with one or two agreed-upon
connections. Explain that we will return to what this arrow represents in future lessons.
Additional Guidance
In the suggested DQB format, the thick arrow pointing from “Science” to “Engineering” represents the notion
that ideas developed by scientists often inform designs developed by engineers. This is not meant to indicate a
unidirectional path; engineering design can also drive the need to develop new or different understandings in science.
As students begin exploring engineering solutions in greater depth in Lesson 5, they may revisit this arrow on the DQB.
Develop the unit question. Ask students to come up with an overarching question that could drive the whole unit.
Say, We first looked closely at one tsunami that devastated Japan in 2011, and we thought about solutions to help people
who may experience a tsunami in the future. Then we began to think about other natural hazards—ones that may happen
close to us, ones we have heard about, and ones our family members experienced. Based on our thinking around tsunamis,
we began thinking about how we can detect when other hazards occur, how we can warn people about them, and what we
can do to reduce the damage. Can anyone share an idea for a main question that puts all our questions together? What is a
question that will help us capture this?
Call upon several students to share their ideas. Listen for any question similar to Where do natural hazards happen and how
do we prepare for them? and then repeat it aloud, asking the class if that sounds like a useful main question for the unit. When
there is general agreement, write that question as the title at the top of the DQB, using the wording the class came up with.
Additional Guidance
The DQB can be referred to at any point during the unit. Often new ideas are considered and added to a classroom
consensus model during the “putting the pieces together” lessons within a unit (Lessons 5 and 9 in this unit); these
LESSON 1 NATURAL HAZARDS | 44
moments offer ideal opportunities for students to consider new questions and document them on the DQB. However,
they may also articulate questions at other times (e.g., when completing individual Progress Trackers). To help recenter
each unit as an experience driven by student questions, it’s important to record any new questions on the DQB as they
come up. Additionally, consider revisiting the DQB as the class reaches consensus in answering one or more questions.
This helps students visualize the progress made in finding answers.
Materials: science notebook, Ideas for Investigation and Information We Need poster, DQB, markers
Brainstorm ideas for investigation or additional information needed. Display slide U. Stay in a Scientists Circle
to brainstorm the types of information or investigations that may help to answer the questions on the DQB. Say, Let’s
look back at our questions and figure out what information we still need. Whether we are thinking about tsunamis or other
hazards, what kinds of information do we need to better understand them and to evaluate technologies designed to reduce
their impact?
Arrange students into small groups of 3 or 4, and assign each group one category of questions on the DQB (“Science
of tsunamis”, “Science of other hazards”, “Engineering solutions for tsunamis” or “Engineering solutions for other
hazards”). Tell students to focus on their category of questions and generate ideas for the best data and information
that would help answer them. For the next 2 minutes, have the groups discuss their ideas and record them on a new
page in their notebooks.
Give each group about 1 minute to report out. Create a poster listing Ideas for Investigation and Information We Need
that will remain public throughout the unit. Make sure all groups get to share at least one idea.
Materials: DQB
Decide where to go next. Suggest to students that before we can tackle the engineering aspects of this unit, the part
about how to prepare for a hazard, we need to know more about where they happen. Point to the questions on the
DQB related to tsunami location or geography. Say, We have a lot of great ideas for ways to investigate natural hazards
so we can design ways to protect the people and communities they affect. Let’s start with the questions we have about the
tsunami. We seem to have questions about where they occur. Maybe we can use what we figure out about the locations of
tsunamis to help us figure out more about other hazards.
This Lesson In this lesson, we investigate global patterns in tsunami occurrences and in particular, patterns
Investigation
related to the causes of tsunamis. We study historical data and figure out that most tsunamis
are caused by earthquakes. Through analyzing data, we notice that only certain types of
2 days earthquakes cause most tsunamis: strong and shallow earthquakes along colliding plate
boundaries. We establish a cause-and-effect relationship between those types of earthquakes
and tsunami formation. We use this relationship to forecast locations that may be at risk for
future tsunamis.
Next Lesson We will analyze three different wave models to make sense of how an earthquake-driven tsunami forms and moves to shore. We will
use different perspectives to understand various aspects of the phenomena, and then we will identify the benefits and limitations of
each model.
Review teacher guide, slides, and teacher references or keys (if applicable).
Make copies of handouts and ensure sufficient copies of student references, readings, and procedures are available.
Add an image of the Driving Question Board (DQB) and the Ideas for Data and Information We Need poster onto slide A.
Decide if you will use a whiteboard or chart paper for the Tsunami Chain of Events. This will stay visible for the duration
of the unit. See How to Build the Tsunami Chain of Events Poster for information about how this will build over the unit.
Prepare other charts:
• Science Ideas chart
• Optional: Patterns We Notice chart
Test the following map and graph links to ensure that computers or tablets can load them:
• day 1: StoryMap viewer and Swipe map. (See the Online Resources Guide for links to these items. www.
coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources)
• day 2: Tuva graphs. (See the Online Resources Guide for links to these items. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-
online-resources)
Watch the following videos to orient to using StoryMaps and TuvaLabs interface:
• Orientation to StoryMaps. (See the Online Resources Guide for a link to this item. www.coreknowledge.org/
cksci-online-resources)
• Orientation to Tuva Interface. (See the Online Resources Guide for a link to this item. www.coreknowledge.org/
cksci-online-resources)
This is a map- and graph-intensive lesson that introduces students to sophisticated data analysis, mathematics, and
computational thinking practices. The lesson is heavily scaffolded, as some ideas are new. Consider removing scaffolds
if your students are ready for an added challenge.
Decide ahead of time whether to display any or all of the maps and graphs to the whole class or within small groups of
students. The lesson is written to have the maps on day 1 displayed to the whole class and the graphs on day 2 in small
groups. Change this configuration as needed for your classroom. Small-group work is best done with 2-3 students per
computer or working together with their own devices. If computers are not available, or the maps or graphs will not
load, printed versions have been provided in the student edition.
Be sure you have materials ready to add magnitude, correlation, causation, and epicenter to your Word Wall. These
words will be familiar if students have done the Everest Unit. However, if they have not done that unit, do not post
these words on the wall until after your class has developed a shared understanding of their meaning.
Materials: science notebook, colored pencil, Tsunami Predictions, Ideas for Data and Information We Need poster *Attending to Equity
Motivate the need to explore tsunami data. Display slide A. Revisit the Ideas for Data and Information We Need Supporting Emerging
poster from Lesson 1 and ask a few students to share their thinking for items they added to the list. It will likely include Multilingual Students: Before
students’ ideas related to these things: students engage in whole-class
• where tsunamis happen in the world discussion, it can be helpful to
CKSci_G6U5_SWP.indd 7
Tsunami Predictions
provide an opportunity to work
• how earthquakes are related to tsunamis in pairs, triads, or small groups on
• places that have experienced a tsunami ideas related to their reasoning.
• why tsunamis happen in some places but not others These smaller group structures
can be especially beneficial for
Use these ideas to motivate the need to look at tsunami data. Say, Last time we were Explain your predictions.
25/10/22 10:52 AM
7
a space to use their linguistic and
Make predictions. Display slide B. Say, Before we look at any data, what ideas do you have about where tsunamis nonlinguistic resources to express
happen? Why do you think they happen there?* Have students turn and talk to a neighbor about the slide’s questions. As their ideas (and learn from other
they discuss their initial ideas, distribute Tsunami Predictions to each student and have them tape it into their science students’ uses of these resources).
notebook. Give them a moment to color in places on their map where they think tsunamis occur and explain why they
made their predictions in the box below the map. Encourage a few students to share their initial ideas with the class.
Materials: science notebook, Where do tsunamis happen? StoryMap (See the Online Resources Guide for a link to this
item. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources), computer, projector, tape
Analyze patterns in global tsunami data. Say, We just made some predictions about where we think tsunamis happen.
Let’s analyze some data from past tsunamis and see if it can support our predictions. Why would looking at historical data
Assessment Opportunity
Building towards: 2.A Use graphical displays of large data sets to identify spatial and temporal patterns in historical
tsunami occurrence.
What to look for/listen for: Students should notice that the locations of tsunamis are similar to the locations of
earthquakes shown in the Everest Unit. They all occur in oceans or other large bodies of water, but not all parts of the
ocean have tsunamis. Tsunamis occur along some coasts and are most frequently caused by earthquakes.
What to do: Some students may struggle with interpreting spatial patterns of historical tsunami occurrence or may
be confused by symbols on the map. Use the sketch on Where do tsunamis happen? to help them record the spatial
pattern they notice. Ask, What parts of the world have had tsunamis in the past? Encourage them to point to parts of the
map that provide evidence for their thinking and then sketch that onto their handout. Support their interpretation
of the symbols by saying, And what did that circle (triangle, square) on the map represent again? This will support all
students in developing a shared understanding of the data representation.
Also challenge students by asking, Where do we not see tsunamis? This is an important perspective to help develop their
forecasting ideas by identifying places (e.g., land and parts of the oceans) that do not have tsunamis.
Motivate the transition to the next map by saying, We noticed that most tsunamis are caused by earthquakes. And we are
wondering if all earthquakes cause tsunamis. We’ve seen earthquake data before in the Everest Unit. Let’s look at that data
again and compare it to where tsunamis happen.
Materials: Comparing All Earthquakes to Earthquakes that Cause Tsunamis weblink (See the Online Resources Guide
for a link to this item. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources), computer, projector, chart paper, markers *Supporting Students in
Compare earthquake data sets. Display slide F and prepare students to view the next set of data. Project the swipe Engaging in Using Mathematics
map. (See the Online Resources Guide for a link to this item. www. and Computational Thinking
coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources) Give students a moment The digital tools (maps, graphs)
to orient to the new map, including the text and legend. This map in the large data sets allow
provides data on all earthquakes around the world for the last few years students to look for patterns and
(left) and all tsunami-generating earthquakes for the last 100 years (right). trends between earthquakes and
Swipe back and forth to notice where the two data sets do and do not tsunamis, and in particular, spatial
overlap. and linear relationships. To support
development of this practice with
As the class explores the swipe map, distribute Comparing All Earthquakes digital tools, use prompts like
to Earthquakes that Cause Tsunamis to each student, and have them capture these:
and describe 1-2 patterns they notice using their handout. Once they have
done this, ask whether they see any difference between all earthquakes • As ____ changes, does ____
and tsunami-generating earthquakes in terms of the type of nearby plate change?
boundary. They should record these observations on the handout as well. • Are there places where ____ occur
together? Are there places where
Additional Guidance they don’t occur together?
• What does the data show us
The swipe map can be projected for the whole class or explored individually or in small groups if computers are available. about ____?
A swipe map allows students to compare two side-by-side data sets in order to notice similarities and differences. This • What evidence from the data
swipe map includes earthquakes around the world in the last few years along with earthquakes related specifically to supports your idea?
tsunami events in the last 100 years. The purpose of this comparison is to either notice or confirm these facts:
• There are far fewer tsunamis than earthquakes, so not all earthquakes cause tsunamis.
• Some areas where earthquakes cause tsunamis match where a lot of earthquakes happen, such as the Pacific Rim.
• There are also places, such as the mid-ocean ridges, that have many earthquakes but do not have tsunamis.
• Earthquakes that cause tsunamis usually occur on plate boundaries that are colliding under the oceans; other
earthquakes that do not cause tsunamis happen along spreading boundaries and on land.
These observations will motivate why it is important to learn more about the types of earthquakes that cause
tsunamis, which happens on day 2.
If this is the first time that students are seeing and/or using a swipe map, orient them to how it functions by
demonstrating the data on each side and then using the “swipe bar” to compare. It might be helpful to pick an
earthquake pattern from the left side (such as the small earthquakes along the mid-Atlantic ridge) and compare it to
the earthquakes related to tsunamis on the right side.
Share patterns in the data. Display slide G. Ask students to share patterns they noticed when comparing the
earthquake and tsunami data. Optionally, chart their ideas on a whiteboard or chart paper titled “Patterns We Notice.”
Materials: science notebook, Tsunami Predictions, Where do tsunamis happen?, Comparing All Earthquakes to *Supporting Students in Three-
Earthquakes that Cause Tsunamis weblink (See the Online Resources Guide for links to these item. www. Dimensional Learning
coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources), computer, projector Assessment opportunities for
Build consensus about the relationship between historical tsunami occurrence, earthquake location, three-dimensional learning on
and tsunami prediction.* Display slide H. Remind students of the question we are figuring out, “Where day 1 of this lesson are focused on
do tsunamis happen and what causes them?” Conduct a Consensus Discussion, eliciting students’ students analyzing and interpreting
observations of the patterns they have noticed and their ideas about areas at risk of tsunamis. data and using mathematics and
computational thinking to make
At this point, students have three types of evidence to consider as they build consensus:
sense of patterns in historical
• their initial predictions of where tsunamis occur, based on prior understandings of where earthquakes occur tsunami occurrence, while also
(Tsunami Predictions) building the case for a cause-
• the historical data of tsunamis and their causes (earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and landslides; Where do tsunamis and-effect relationships between
happen?) certain types of earthquakes and
tsunami formation, which will be
• the comparison between all global earthquake data and tsunami-generating earthquake data (Comparing All
developed on day 2.
Earthquakes to Earthquakes that Cause Tsunamis)
Building towards: 2.B Use maps (digital tools) to analyze large data sets to identify cause-and-effect relationships
between related geologic forces and resulting tsunamis.
What to look for/listen for:
• On the first map, students gather evidence that tsunamis occur in only certain parts of the world, in the oceans, and
are mostly caused by earthquakes.
• On the second swipe map, students compare recent earthquake data to earthquakes historically related to
tsunamis. Interpretations should include the idea that tsunamis occur in the same place as some earthquakes, but
earthquakes also occur in places where tsunamis do not.
These observed patterns motivate looking more closely at earthquake types to understand where tsunamis occur and
why. On day 2, students will use a series of graphs about earthquake characteristics to determine which specific kinds
of earthquakes are related to (and might cause) tsunamis.
What to do: If students struggle with the swipe map, point them to specific familiar locations (e.g., mid-Atlantic ridge,
west coast of South America) and ask if earthquakes occur there or not, and also if tsunamis occur there or not. This
will help them notice that not all earthquakes cause tsunamis. This key idea motivates the next investigation of the
earthquakes that do cause tsunamis.
Revisit how we talk about apparent relationships between things or events.** Remind students of previous
words they earned in the Everest Unit: correlation, or when two things seem to be related to each other, and causation,
when one thing causes another thing to happen. Place these words on the Word Wall if they are not there.
At this point, students have figured out that earthquakes and tsunamis are related, but they must keep in mind that
correlation does not always mean causation. Although not all earthquakes are associated with tsunamis, it seems that
some are. The next step is to investigate the causal link between earthquakes and tsunamis. Similarly, tsunamis seem to
occur on colliding plate boundaries, but we have not established a causal relationship, so this is also only a correlation.
Additional Guidance
If you have not taught the Everest Unit, you might need to introduce the word correlation at this point. Tell students that
when two things or events seem to be related, such as earthquakes and tsunamis, we call that correlation. Emphasize
that this does not necessarily mean that one causes the other to happen, but rather that there is some relationship
worth investigating further.
End of day 1
Materials: Connecting Earthquakes and Tsunamis, Tuva Graphing Instructions (See the Online Resources Guide for a
link to this item. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources), computer
Prepare to analyze data. Set the stage for analyzing additional tsunami data by
saying, We are trying to figure out why some earthquakes cause tsunamis while others
do not. So, we are going to dig into some additional data using new tools to see if we
can figure this out. Give each student a copy of Connecting Earthquakes and Tsunamis.
Display slide J and have students gather in groups of 2-3 per computer to begin their
investigation.*
Tuva allows students to annotate graphs digitally and/or download screenshots of the graphs they make. Alternatively, the
handout provides space to quickly sketch the graph pattern (it does not need to be perfect) and then annotate it. Based
on your classroom technology, either annotating digitally or on the handout is acceptable. What matters is that either
method provides a way for students to annotate their observations and then make sense of them to interpret the data.
Materials: science notebook, Where do tsunamis happen?, Comparing All Earthquakes to Earthquakes that Cause *Attending to Equity
Tsunamis, Connecting Earthquakes and Tsunamis, chart paper, markers, large sticky notes Supporting Universal Design
Share noticings and patterns from the graph investigation.* Title a piece of chart paper or a whiteboard for Learning: It might be helpful
“Tsunami Chain of Events.” Keep slide K projected. Use this Consensus Discussion share out to develop a to continue to project the graphs
cause-and-effect diagram to explain the relationship between geologic forces (earthquakes) and the and maps for the class during this
formation of tsunamis.* This will help students use evidence from their data analysis to refine their discussion so students can walk up
predictions for where tsunamis happen. to the media and point out patterns
in the data. This allows students
Additional Guidance to express their noticings through
physical action, and can also help
The Tsunami Chain of Events poster will be used throughout the unit, so make sure it is visible to students for the to highlight the patterns and critical
remaining lessons. Use large sticky notes to track cause-and-effect relationships for this lesson and here on, moving features through representation.
them around as needed.
Connect tsunamis and earthquake strength. Ask, When you investigated how strong the earthquake is and the maximum
wave height, did you notice any pattern? Does the strength of the earthquake matter? Ask students to share what they noticed.
Additional Guidance
Some students may struggle with “shallow” or “near the surface” versus “deep,” thinking these refer to the depth of
the water instead of the depth inside Earth’s crust. Prompt students to consider ideas built in the Everest Unit around
the plates and depth of the crust. The reason earthquake depth is important for tsunami formation is that deeper
earthquakes (>70 km) do not cause as much shift in the ocean floor; shallow earthquakes cause more movement in the
ocean floor and are thus more likely to generate tsunamis. The important idea to develop here is that earthquakes closer
to the surface of the crust are related to tsunamis. Students will build out the mechanism for this relationship in Lesson 3.
Combine factors and modify the diagram. Say, OK, we know that strong earthquakes cause tsunamis and shallow
earthquakes cause tsunamis. What if you have a strong, shallow earthquake? What do you think would happen? Students are
likely to respond that the tsunami wave height would be even bigger. Say, OK, let’s put these ideas together and modify
our diagram. Add a plus sign between the causes and combine the effects into one sticky note for higher wave heights.
Assessment Opportunity
Building towards: 2.C Integrate quantitative and qualitative scientific information to connect cause-and-effect
relationships to predict communities at risk for future tsunami occurrence.
What to look for/listen for:
• ideas about a causal relationship between shallow, strong earthquakes along colliding boundaries and the
formation of tsunamis (and specifically, tsunami wave height increasing)
• predictions that communities in regions where these types of earthquakes occur are most at risk, and that
communities in regions that don’t have these earthquakes are not likely to experience tsunamis
What to do: Students’ revised predictions are a good indicator of how well they have incorporated the new ideas
about cause-and-effect relationships between earthquakes and tsunamis. If students struggle with updating
predictions, ask these questions:
• Are communities along the Atlantic coast at risk for tsunamis? Why not? (Tsunamis haven’t happened there; they don’t
have high-magnitude earthquakes; it is a spreading boundary in the middle of the Atlantic.)
What was our question? What science ideas did we figure out? How can engineers use these ideas?
Ask students to share what they figured out about where tsunamis happen. Here are some possible student responses:
• Tsunamis are related to earthquakes, volcanoes, and landslides.
• Almost all tsunamis occur along plate boundaries where the plates are colliding.
• Not all earthquakes are related to tsunamis.
• Stronger, shallow earthquakes cause bigger tsunamis to form.
Now ask students how engineers might use this information to protect communities. Here are some possible student
responses:
• Knowing where tsunamis (or hazards) have happened before lets us know where they might happen again.
• Knowing what causes a tsunami to form lets us know when it might happen.
• If an earthquake that is strong and shallow happens, then we can warn people.
• We can identify the places in the world that are most at risk of tsunamis because of the types of earthquakes that
happen there.
Additional Guidance
There is not always a one-for-one connection between science ideas and engineering applications, but the purpose
of this poster is to help students make explicit connections between the science ideas and how those can be applied
when appropriate.
LESSON 2 NATURAL HAZARDS | 63
11. Problematize the connection to earthquakes. 2 min
Materials: None
Problematize how an earthquake makes a tsunami wave. Display slide M. Ask students to turn and talk briefly
about their thinking for how a strong, shallow earthquake can cause the formation of a tsunami. If time allows, have a
few students share their initial ideas.
E ncourage students to ask their family or friends what natural hazards have happened in their local area in recent
years (or any area the students have lived in previously, if they are new to the community). If this investigation
already occurred during Lesson 1, it does not need to be repeated.
Importantly, students can ask their friends, family, and/or caregivers what caused those local hazards to happen.
If students have high interest, they can also investigate locations in the world where active hazards are happening
using the PDC Disaster Alert interactive map. (See the Online Resources Guide for a link to this item. www.
coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources) This map displays recent hazards.
1. Plan ahead.
Determine your pacing to introduce the reading selections, check in with students on their progress, and discuss the
reading content and writing exercise. If you are performing Science Literacy as a structured, weekly routine, you might
implement a schedule like this:
• Monday: Designate a ten-minute period at the beginning of the week to introduce students to the assignment.
• Wednesday: Plan to touch base briefly with students in the middle of the week to answer questions about the
reading, to clarify expectations about the writing exercise, and to help students stay on track.
• Friday: Set aside time at the end of the week to facilitate a discussion about the reading and the writing exercise.
You’ll proceed with the in-class lesson investigations during this week.
• Let students know they will read independently and then complete a short writing assignment. The reading
selection relates to topics they are presently exploring in their Natural Hazards unit science investigations.
• The reading and writing will be completed outside of class (unless you have available class time to allocate).
• Preview the reading. Share a short summary of what students can expect.
There are two reading selections in Collection 1.
In the first, you will interpret data about natural hazards on graphs, charts, and maps, looking for patterns related to
location and time.
Touch base midweek with students to make sure they are on track while working independently. You may choose to
administer a midweek minute-quiz to give students a concrete reason not to postpone completing the reading until
the last minute. Ask questions such as these, and have students jot answers on a half sheet of paper:
Ask a few brief discussion questions related to the reading that will help students tie the text content to students’
classroom investigations.
• Refer students to the Exercise Page 1. Provide more specific guidance about expectations for students’ deliverables Exercise Page
due at the end of the week.
The writing expectation for this assignment is to develop a script for a one-minute news video about one of the events
depicted in literature or art in the second reading.
EP 1
The tone of your news report should be objective, meaning you keep your opinions out.
Do be respectful of the people involved, especially those who died or were injured.
Start with a sentence that explains the point of the video—where you are and what just happened.
Write directly to the audience.
Read your script aloud, and make changes to get it to sound natural.
• Explain that a well-organized script must be clear enough for another person to produce the video.
• Answer any questions students may have relative to the reading content or the exercise expectations.
Facilitate class discussion about the reading collection and writing exercise. While this OpenSciEd unit focuses on one Student Reader
type of natural hazard—tsunamis—the first reading in Collection 1 introduces students to several other examples, each
with a different type of graphic data display to explore. The second reading demonstrates how writers and visual artists of
the past have responded to natural hazard events and preserved impactful records of their effects on humans. Collection 1
The Wildland Fire Potential Index takes some time to Answers will depend on the geographic region.
interpret. How would you explain the wildfire forecast for Where we live near Los Angeles, California, the colors on the SUPPORT—The strength of the
the region where you live on July 13, 2021? map are orange and red. That means the index was in the song’s lyrics and rhythms will be
range from 100 to 247. Those are high numbers and warm more apparent if students listen to
colors, so the risk was very high. the original musical recording as
they read.
What can you infer the numbers on the color gradient I don’t think they mean that the risk of wildfire is greater
mean when they are 249 and higher? because the colors are cool grays and greens. And the gradient
uses light blue for water, where it’s impossible to have a
wildfire.
For Exercise 1, students should, from a template provided, write a script for a one-minute news report about one of the
natural hazard events depicted in the second reading selection—the eruption of Mt. Vesuvius in 79 CE, a hurricane or
great wave off the coast of Japan, a storm and waterspout in the Atlantic Ocean, or an early November storm on Lake
Superior. Scripts should describe the natural conditions and their effect on humans and human-made structures.
EXTEND—After writing their own
Look for evidence that the science content in the scripts is based on details in the work of art or literature and that the scripts, students may be interested
science about the natural hazard is stated accurately. to see how the “pros” did it for
some of the events (and related
events) described in the readings.
Have students watch videos of
news reports of natural disasters,
and then invite them to read
their own scripted reports of the
historical events described in the
art and literature in this collection.
Previous Lesson We investigated patterns in historical tsunami data and figured out that most tsunamis are caused by strong, shallow earthquakes on
colliding plate boundaries. We established a cause-and-effect relationship and used it to forecast locations at risk for future tsunamis.
This Lesson We analyze three different wave models to make sense of how an earthquake-driven
Investigation
tsunami forms and moves to shore. We use different perspectives to understand
various aspects of the phenomena, and then we identify the benefits and limitations
3 days of each model. We add new science and engineering ideas to our Tsunami Chain of
Events poster.
NOAA
Next Lesson We will use the Tsunami Chain of Events poster to construct an explanation of the related geologic forces that cause a tsunami to
form, and we will also forecast impact for communities at risk. We will consider how to protect communities from the effects of a
tsunami. We will revisit the Driving Question Board and document responses to questions we can answer.
End of day 1
4 5 min NAVIGATION H Wave Investigations
Reflect on what we have learned from the first two wave models about how an
earthquake causes a tsunami. Identify what we still want to figure out.
5 25 min ANALYZE THE TSUNAMI WAVE MODEL I-K Wave Investigations, 6.5 - Lesson 3
Watch a computer-generated visualization model of data that models Tsunami Wave Model (See the Online
how water behaves after an earthquake occurs underneath the ocean and Resources Guide for a link to this item.
the resulting wave reaches the shore. Record and share observations and www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-
interpretations and connect them to tsunamis in general. resources), computer, projector
6 15 min REFLECT ON THE BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE THREE WAVE L-M Wave Investigations, Comparing Different
MODELS Wave Models chart
Use our recorded observations and analyses to create a chart comparing the
benefits and limitations of each wave model.
End of day 2
7 15 min REFLECT ON NEW SCIENCE IDEAS N Science Ideas chart
In a Scientists Circle, discuss and record the science ideas figured out so far to
help answer our questions about tsunamis.
End of day 3
Review teacher guide, slides, and teacher references or keys (if applicable).
Make copies of handouts and ensure sufficient copies of student references, readings, and procedures are available.
If you taught the Unit 6.4: What causes Earth’s surface to change? (Everest Unit) prior to this unit, you may want to keep
some of its words up on your Word Wall to support students in continuing to use scientific language they have worked
with already. In this lesson, epicenter (earned in the Everest Unit) and amplitude will be used in analyzing tsunami wave
behavior. Although students should have had experience with using these words by now, it is necessary to put them
on the Word Wall due to their importance when modeling how earthquakes cause tsunamis.
Alternative option: For day 1, the class analyzed a video of a physical wave model using a foil roasting pan. If you have
the time and supplies, demonstrate this model live in your classroom. Place a large disposable foil roasting pan on
top of two bricks or thick books so you can access the pan from underneath without moving it around. Fill the pan
¼ full with water. After the water stops moving, use a solid thin object, such as a metal butter knife or the handle of
a large metal spoon, to push up slowly on the bottom of the pan in one spot. Hold this for a few seconds until the
water stops moving. Instruct students to watch what happens to the water. Then release this quickly to simulate an
earthquake and the resulting water movement. It can be helpful to have a student capture a slow-motion video of this
demonstration so the class can watch what happens to the water several times.
For day 2, make a Comparing Different Wave Models chart ahead of time to be completed with the class. You may
need more than one piece of chart paper for this chart. There is an example of what this poster might look like later in
the teacher guide.
For day 3, have the Tsunami Chain of Events poster from Lesson 2, markers, large sticky notes; the Science Ideas chart
from Lesson 2 ready to add new ideas; and the Local Hazards poster and Technologies or Related Solutions poster.
1. Navigation 5 min
Materials: Wave Investigations, 6.5 - Lesson 3 Foil Pan Model (See the Online Resources Guide for a link to this item.
www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources), computer, projector *Supporting Students in
Engaging in Analyzing and
Orient students to the handout. Distribute a copy of the Wave Investigations handout to each student and take a
Interpreting Data
moment to orient them to the rows and columns where they will record their observations and interpretations.*
Students will make “What I see”
Introduce the Foil Pan Model. Display slide B to present the first model of the foil pan filled with water and raised and “What it means” statements
on two bricks, allowing access underneath the bottom of the pan. Say, Let’s begin by making observations of how water for each model used in this lesson.
behaves when the surface below it is disturbed. After you watch the video of this first model, you’ll use your handout to keep This is similar to the Identify and
track of what you saw happening with the water. Interpret (I2) sensemaking strategy
Project 6.5 - Lesson 3 Foil Pan Model (See the Online Resources Guide for a link to this item. www.coreknowledge. (used for numeric data and graphs)
org/cksci-online-resources) for the class. Play the video at least twice, pausing after each viewing to have students in helping students break down
record their noticings in the “What I see” column of their handout.* information-rich data into smaller
pieces to interpret, enabling them
Alternate Activity to use the data to provide evidence
for a phenomenon.
If you have the time and supplies, demonstrate this model live in your classroom. Place a large disposable foil roasting
pan on top of two bricks or thick books so you can access the pan from underneath without moving it around. Fill the *Attending to Equity
pan ¼ full with water. After the water stops moving, use a solid thin object, such as a metal butter knife or the handle Supporting Universal Design
of a large metal spoon, to push up slowly on the bottom of the pan in one spot. Hold this for a few seconds until the for Learning: As students hear
water stops moving. Instruct students to watch what happens to the water. Then release this quickly to simulate an one another’s observations from
earthquake and the resulting water movement. It can be helpful to have a student capture a slow-motion video of this the Foil Pan Model or respond
demonstration so the class can watch what happens to the water several times. to your questions, they may
ask to watch the video again.
Share observations and connect the model to the real world. Say, Remember, we are trying to figure out how an Be prepared to show it again to
earthquake causes a tsunami to form and move. So as we share what we saw happening with the water in this investigation, ensure that all students have a
let’s also think about how the different parts in the foil pan model relate to an actual tsunami. For example, what would the common understanding of the
water in the pan represent in the real world? Students should say the ocean. phenomenon. For some students,
Continue this brief discussion, using prompts like those below to talk through how the water moved and how the the task of watching and recording
model relates to the real world. observations can be challenging;
offering another viewing supports
Suggested prompts Sample student responses Follow-up question engagement by providing a new
purpose for rewatching it to
What were some of the things you When the pan moved up, the water If we want to use this to help us figure focus on different aspects of the
noticed happening in the foil pan? seemed to move up and out of the way out tsunamis, then what does the phenomenon.
What happened when the bottom of from the space where the pan moved bottom of the pan in this investigation
the pan was moved? up. Then when the pan moved back represent in the real world? In this lesson, there will be two
down in place, the water moved back other videos to watch and make
(The ocean floor.) sense of, so this strategy will be
toward the center.
useful for those as well.
Prior to this unit in the sequence, students have learned that all matter is made of particles (smaller pieces) and that
these particles move and transfer energy to other particles. In the Cup Design Unit, when students investigate why
drinks cool down over time and why some cups keep drinks cool longer, they figure out that particles are arranged
close to each other in a solid, with some space between them in a liquid, or with a lot of space between them in a gas.
Students also figure out that these moving particles transfer energy when they collide; we see evidence of this energy
transfer through temperature changes. If your students have not gone through the Cup Design Unit, you may need to
support them when explaining how the energy within the wave decreases as energy is transferred to particles in the
water and the land/pan.
Keep in mind that ideas about energy transfer and waves will be revisited more fully in the Collisions Unit and Sound
Unit later in the program.
Share interpretations to make sense of the model.* Display slide C. Say, Now let’s pause and reflect on how what we
saw happen with the waves in the pan can help us understand how tsunamis form and move. We’ll do this for each of our
three models. Give students 5 minutes to work with a partner to complete the first row of Wave Investigations with their
interpretations of the model.
Assessment Opportunity
Building towards: 3.A.1 Analyze and interpret data from different wave models to identify patterns in how the wave
forms initially and moves toward shore, changing the height (amplitude) of the wave as it interacts with the ocean
floor.
What to look for: Students use three different wave models in this lesson. After analyzing each model, the class
pauses to share what has been figured out about the waves in the model and real-life tsunamis in the ocean. From the
Foil Pan Model, listen for students to identify the following key ideas:
• The up-and-down motion of the pan bottom (or ocean floor) causes the water above it to move in a similar pattern
(up and down), causing large waves to form.
• Waves form above the spot where the pan bottom is disturbed (moved). These waves move outward in a circular or
ripple pattern from that location.
• These waves continue to move out in all directions until they reach the edge of the pan.
• At the edge of the pan, the waves collide with the pan wall and then reflect back away from the wall.
• The waves get smaller over time. Waves seem to transfer energy to the pan wall.
What to do: Some students may struggle with recording observations while watching the video of this model. Make
the video available to students to watch repeatedly on their own outside of class, so they have enough time to make
sense of what they are observing and can find patterns of cause and effect to explain how a tsunami forms and moves.
Another option, if the technology is available in your classroom, is to watch the video once as a class and then have
students play it again in small groups to make their observations. As they rewatch the video, encourage them to focus
on the interactions between the waves and the sides of the pan. Also, encourage them to think about the movement
Key Ideas
Purpose of the discussion: This brief discussion supports students in thinking about what we can figure out about a
real-world phenomenon from a small-scale model. As students work to make sense of what is represented in the Foil
Pan Model, support them in making connections to what they have already experienced with water waves in their own
life, what they see happening in the pan, and what this helps us figure out about tsunamis.
Materials: Wave Investigations, 6.5 - Lesson 3 NOAA Tsunami Model (See the Online Resources Guide for a link to this *Attending to Equity
item. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources), computer, projector Supporting Universal Design
Introduce the NOAA Tsunami Model. Display slide E. Say, I have another model to share with you. This is a computer- for Learning: The NOAA Tsunami
generated visualization model created by scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA, Model is somewhat complicated.
using data collected about the 2011 Japan tsunami that we investigated in Lesson 1. To create this model, the scientists take It is important to take time to help
a whole bunch of data, including measurements of wave height and put this data in a form that allows us to see and make students make sense of what the
sense of changes over time. Tell them they will use their same Wave Investigations handout to record observations and different keys and colors represent.
interpretations. Play the video a few times and
Project 6.5 - Lesson 3 NOAA Tsunami Model (See the Online Resources Guide for a link to this item. www. pause it periodically. It can be
coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources). Remind students to simply watch the video the first time through and helpful to have students share
then make initial observations on their handout afterward. Play the video several times to elicit new observations.* different things they notice and
describe what they represent. For
example, someone might notice
Additional Guidance
The discussion about the NOAA model uses words students should bring into this unit from previous experiences.
Amplitude is a term they should have learned in Grade 4, 4-PS4-1: “Waves of the same type can differ in amplitude
(height of the wave) and wavelength (spacing between wave peaks)”. This term is helpful for referring to the height of
water waves formed by earthquakes. In the Everest Unit prior to this one, students encountered and made sense of the
word epicenter as they figured out how earthquakes are related to changes in Earth’s surface. They encounter this word
again with the NOAA model in describing the location where the earthquake occurs, causing waves to travel away
from that point in all directions.
If you taught the Everest Unit, you may wish to keep epicenter up on your Word Wall. If these two words are not on your
wall at this time, you may wish to add them to support conceptualizing what they refer to, as they will be used again in
this unit. Here is an example of how these words might look on the Word Wall:
Display slide F. Give students a few minutes to work with their partner to complete the second row in their handout.
Building towards: 3.A.2 Analyze and interpret data from different wave models to identify patterns in how the wave
forms initially and moves toward shore, changing height (amplitude) as it interacts with the ocean floor.
What to look for/listen for: After analyzing the NOAA Tsunami Model, listen for students to identify the following key
ideas:
• These waves move out from the location where the plates move and collide with one another (the earthquake’s
epicenter) in all directions.
• The waves farther out in the ocean where the earthquake first happens (nearer to the epicenter) are not as big as
the ones near the shore.
• As the waves move toward the shore, their height (amplitude) changes (based on the color scale in the model), in
most cases getting taller as they get closer to land.
• The waves that reach land closer to where the earthquake happens are taller than those that reach land farther from
the epicenter.
• Waves reflect off (or bounce off) things they collide with in the ocean, like shorelines and islands.
What to do: This visualization model is complex due to the amount of different measurements being represented.
Some students may struggle with recording observations while watching. Watch the visualization several times
so they have enough time to make sense of what they are observing and are able to find patterns of cause and
effect. If possible, watch the video once as a class and then have students play it again in small groups to make their
observations. If students do not develop all the ideas listed above, their engagement with the two other wave models
may support the development of these ideas from a different perspective.
Combine analyses of the second model and connect to tsunamis. Show slide G. Say, What were some connections
you and your partner made between the model we analyzed and how a tsunami behaves? Ask different pairs to share
what they discussed, and encourage students to add to their handout if they hear ideas they agree with but had not
recorded yet.
Key Ideas
Purpose of the discussion: As students work to make sense of what is represented in the NOAA Tsunami Model,
support them in connecting what they have seen in this model to what they learned about the 2011 Japan tsunami from
Lesson 1. The goal is for students to continue to develop their conceptual model for how and why a tsunami occurs.
Listen for these ideas:
• Tsunamis can move pretty fast.
• Tsunamis keep going until they run into land. We think that when this happens, they transfer energy to the land
before they reflect away from it.
• Larger tsunamis would have more water that reaches the shore, which could mean more energy is transferred to the
land. Maybe this is why they are so damaging to some areas?
End of day 1
4. Navigation 5 min
Materials: Wave Investigations, 6.5 - Lesson 3 Tsunami Wave Model (See the Online Resources Guide for a link to this
item. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources), computer, projector
Introduce the Tsunami Wave Model. Display slide I and prepare students to investigate the final model. Say, This is a
computer-generated simulation model that scientists designed using data from tsunamis caused by earthquakes. In the first
two models we analyzed, we saw the water wave movement from above, as if we were looking down on the ocean. In this
model, we will shift perspective, seeing most of the model from a side view.
Play the simulation model 6.5 - Lesson 3 Tsunami Wave Model (See the Online Resources Guide for a link to this item.
www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources). As before, you will show the video repeatedly, so encourage
Additional Guidance
It may be challenging for students to make sense of this computer-generated simulation model of what happens when
an earthquake occurs under the ocean. The simulation begins at the shifting ocean floor and follows the movement
of water all the way to shore. Students may need support in figuring out what they are looking at in this model. If the
technology is available, you may wish to provide access to the video for students to watch in small groups, or on their
own outside of class.
Share observations and interpretations to make sense of the model. After watching the simulation model several
times, pause to make sense of it as a class. Use prompts like those below to help guide this discussion.
Purpose of the discussion: The Tsunami Wave Model has many components that map nicely to the real-world
phenomena. After this brief discussion about the different aspects of the model, students work again with a partner
to reflect on how what they saw in this model helps us make sense of what is happening with the ocean floor and the
movement of the wave when a tsunami forms.
Listen for these ideas:
• As the ocean floor moves upward, it transfers some of its energy to the water, causing the water to move.
• The wave moves away from where the earthquake happened and toward the shore.
• The wave changes over time; it gets bigger.
• The height (amplitude) of the wave seems small until the middle to the end of the video, when the water above the
ocean floor becomes shallower. Then the wave gets much bigger.
Display slide J. Give students a few minutes to work with their partner to complete the third row in their handout.
Assessment Opportunity
Building towards: 3.A.3 Analyze and interpret data from different wave models to identify patterns in how the wave
forms initially and moves toward shore, changing height (amplitude) as it interacts with the ocean floor.
What to look for/listen for: After analyzing the Tsunami Wave Model, listen for students to identify the following key
ideas:
• When a strong, shallow earthquake happens and causes part of the ocean floor to move up and another part to
move down (vertically), a tsunami can happen.
• These waves move out from the location where the ocean floor moves.
• The height (amplitude) of the waves that are farther out in the ocean (closer to the epicenter) is less than the ones
that reach the shore.
• As the waves move toward the shore where the water above the ocean floor is shallower, the amplitude increases.
• When the wave reaches shore, it seems to fall over itself and spread out or run up onto the land.
• The bigger the wave that reaches the shore, the more it will move onto land.
What to do: Some students may struggle with recording observations while watching, as this visualization model
changes perspectives and location of what is being represented. It may help to play the video once all the way
through, telling students to simply watch and not take notes. Then play it a second and perhaps a third time, pausing
at incremental places to allow students to reflect on three segments of the model as they record their observations:
The beginning of the video shows the ocean floor snapping and breaking, then a flyover shows the wave moving out
from the epicenter. The next part shifts to show how the wave amplitude changes as the water above the ocean floor
becomes shallower. The last part shows the wave reaching the shore. Another option, if the technology is available, is
to watch the video once as a class and then have students play it again in small groups to make observations.
Key Ideas
Purpose of the discussion: As students work to make sense of what is represented in the Tsunami Wave Simulation,
support them in making connections to what they see happening from the point when the ocean floor moves until
the wave reaches land. The goal is for students to continue to develop their conceptual model for how tsunamis form
and move.
Listen for these ideas:
• When the ocean floor moved, it immediately pushed the water up with it. We think this is how a tsunami happens in
the real world when the plates collide and there is an earthquake.
• When the ocean floor pushed the water up, energy was transferred from the movement to the water.
• At first the wave was not very big, but as the water above the ocean floor became shallower, the wave’s height
(amplitude) increased. This happened closer to shore.
• The amplitude of the wave was much higher by the time it reached the shore.
• Once the wave reached the shore, it crashed onto the land—like it was falling over. Say, Okay, wow! We have
analyzed three different wave models. Let’s take stock of how we can use each model to help us explain how an
earthquake could cause a tsunami.
6. Reflect on the benefits and limitations of the three wave models. 15 min
Materials: Wave Investigations, Comparing Different Wave Models chart *Supporting Students in
Gather in a Scientists Circle. Ask students to bring Wave Investigations along with a chair to a Scientists Circle. Display Engaging in Developing and
slide L. Once together, have them turn and talk, saying, Share with a partner what you think was helpful about each Using Models
model to help us explain a tsunami and what was incomplete (or limiting) about each model. This lesson uses three different
After partners have had a few minutes to share, display slide M. Tell the class that we will revisit each wave model ways to model the generation
and talk about what we figured out from each one, and also any limitations of the model—in other words, what was and movement of water waves,
incomplete about the model for helping us explain what happens when a tsunami forms and moves. Encourage including tsunamis. Each one
students to use what they discussed with their partner and wrote on their handout.* allows students to learn something
new about the phenomenon, while
Discuss the models’ benefits and limitations and record what is shared on the Comparing Different Wave it also has limitations that do not
Models chart. An example of a completed chart is below.
Building towards: 3.B Evaluate the limitations and benefits of different wave models for explaining how tsunamis
form from a movement in the ocean floor (causes), and how they move and change as they approach the shore
(effect).
What to look for/listen for: Students’ ability to identify the benefits and limitations of the three wave models used to
explain how an earthquake can cause a tsunami. Students work with a partner initially to look back through what they
have recorded about waves, earthquakes, and tsunamis from the models analyzed on days 1 and 2, and they identify
benefits and limitations in partners and as a class. See the example Comparing Different Wave Models chart in this
Teacher Guide.
What to do: Students may struggle to identify limitations, as this term may be unfamiliar in this context. Encourage
them to revisit what they observed and recorded in Wave Investigations to help them realize that the word limitations
refers to the models’ inability to give us a complete picture of what happens during a tsunami. Provide example(s) to
help them see that none of these models alone is a full explanation, but if they put together the pieces they observed
in each simulation, they have a more complete picture of how a tsunami forms and moves.
End of day 2
Wait to update the engineering column of the Science Ideas chart until after updating the Tsunami Chain of Events
poster.
8. Update the Tsunami Chain of Events and consider engineering ideas. 20 min
Materials: Tsunami Chain of Events poster, large sticky notes, markers, Science Ideas chart
Facilitate a Consensus Discussion to update the Tsunami Chain of Events poster. Display slide O. Say, Let’s return
to our Tsunami Chain of Events. In our last lesson we figured out that higher-magnitude, shallow earthquakes lead to higher
waves and then a tsunami can happen. Now, we know more about how a wave forms from this kind of earthquake. So let’s
add that to the poster. Using prompts like those below, guide students to identify the motion of the ocean floor and the
water above it.
Additional Guidance
The Tsunami Chain of Events poster was started in Lesson 2, using large sticky notes as steps in the chain to show
cause-and-effect relationships. Some of the sticky notes from Lesson 2 may need to be shifted as the class comes to
consensus. For example, students previously figured out that higher-magnitude, shallow earthquakes cause greater
wave heights, leading to tsunamis. At this point, it is important to add the new ideas that this type of earthquake
causes the ocean floor to move, which causes water to be displaced above it, which then causes a tsunami to form.
Update the Science Ideas chart to include engineering applications. Brainstorm how these science ideas could be
useful to engineers. Say, Now that we have figured out all these science ideas about how tsunamis form and what happens
when they reach the shore, let’s think about how these ideas can help engineers develop ways to protect communities.
Ask students how engineers might use this information to protect communities. As ideas are shared and the class agrees,
add them to the third column of the Science Ideas chart. Here are some example ideas:
• Knowing the types of earthquakes that cause tsunamis will help us to monitor for those earthquakes so we can warn
communities when one occurs.
• Knowing the location of a strong, shallow earthquake in relation to communities will help to determine who needs to
be warned and when.
9. Navigation 10 min
Materials: Science Ideas chart, Local Hazards poster and Technologies or Related Solutions poster
Consider the use of tsunami science ideas for other natural hazards. Draw the class’s attention to the Local
Hazards poster and Technologies or Related Solutions poster from Lesson 1. Display slide P and read the question
aloud: If we could get these same key pieces of data about a different natural hazard, do you think they could be used to
predict where that hazard will occur and to figure out ways to protect communities? Have students turn and talk about that
question with a partner for a minute or two.
After a few minutes, help students consider how to generalize the tsunami science and engineering ideas to other
hazards with prompts like these:
• Why is it important to know where these things happen and when they happen?
• Do you think knowing how big the hazard is, how fast it is moving, and how close it is to communities would all be
important pieces of data to consider for other hazards?
• What similar types of data for other hazards do you think we could use to help predict where these hazards might occur in
the future?
Let a few students share their ideas. Then tell the class that throughout the unit, we will continue to work on the
tsunami hazard, but it is important to keep in mind how the tsunami ideas might be helpful to consider for other
hazards.
This Lesson Using the Tsunami Chain of Events poster as evidence from previous lessons, we construct
an explanation of the related geologic forces that cause a tsunami to form, and we
Putting Pieces Together
forecast impact for communities at risk. Then we use what we know about tsunamis—
1 day where they happen and how they form and move—to consider how to protect people
and property from their effects. We revisit the Driving Question Board to determine which
questions we can answer.
Next Lesson We will revisit the coastal communities of Japan to evaluate existing solutions designed to protect them from tsunamis. We will
define our problem and identify criteria and constraints for evaluating solutions. We will use a systematic process to determine
which solutions might be promising for these communities. We will consider how needs vary from one community to another and
what is needed if a solution fails.
3 10 min REVISIT THE DRIVING QUESTION BOARD C-D sticky dots, black markers, 5-x-8 index
Revisit the Driving Question Board (DQB) and determine which cards, tape, pushpins (optional)
questions can now be answered. Work in partners or small groups to
document answers to those questions.
4 5 min NAVIGATION: MOTIVATE THE NEED TO REVISIT ENGINEERING E Tsunami: Japan 2011, sticky dots
DESIGN
Revisit initial ideas and designs from Lesson 1 for detecting, warning,
and reducing damage caused by a tsunami. Motivate the need to
evaluate existing solutions.
End of day 1
Review teacher guide, slides, and teacher references or keys (if applicable).
Make copies of handouts and ensure sufficient copies of student references, readings, and procedures are available.
Materials: sticky dots, black markers, 5-x-8 index cards, tape, pushpins (optional)
Review questions on the DQB. Show slide C and say, Now, let’s revisit the DQB. Take a few minutes to look through the
questions on the board, and put sticky dots on those that you think we can now answer based on what we have learned
about tsunamis up to this point. We will then work in partners or small groups to document answers to those questions.
Ask students to gather around the DQB, then give them 2-3 minutes to individually place sticky dots on questions they
feel they can answer. Have them step back and review the selected questions. After a minute or two, ask students to
share their selections.
Document and post answers to selected questions.* Show slide D and have students work either in pairs or in
groups of 3 to select a question with a sticky dot and return to their desks. They should tape their selected question to
the upper-left hand corner of a large (5-x-8) index card, then use a black marker to write the answer on the index card.
While students work, write the category titles on large index cards, and use tape (or pushpins) to post these cards near
the DQB. Leave room under each category card for answered questions. As students finish, have them use tape (or
a pushpin) to post their answered question (that is, their taped-together question and index card answer) under the
appropriate category. All unanswered questions will remain on the DQB.
Additional Guidance
The categories on your DQB and the questions selected may differ slightly from those in the sample responses here.
However, students should select questions that focus on the geologic forces that trigger tsunamis, the motion (or
energy) that occurs as tsunamis move across the ocean and onto land, and the effects of tsunamis on coastlines and
coastal communities.
Please note that this activity may take more than the allotted 10 minutes, especially if students have little or no
experience documenting answers to questions from the DQB. If you do not have enough time to complete this
activity in class, each student can select a question and tape it to an index card to take with them as a home learning
assignment. They can document the answer to their assigned question at home and return the completed card at the
beginning of the next class period.
Materials: science notebook, Tsunami: Japan 2011, sticky dots * Supporting Students in
Motivate the need to revisit engineering designs with new science ideas in mind. Say, We have a pretty good Engaging in Constructing
understanding of what causes tsunamis, where they happen, how they move, and the types of places where they impact Explanations and Designing
people and property. If we can forecast where tsunamis are more likely to cause damage, then we can do something about Solutions
it—we can try to prepare and protect people and property from this natural hazard. This lesson prepares students for
Show slide E and ask students to turn back in their notebooks to Tsunami: Japan 2011 from Lesson 1. Give them a the engineering evaluation portion
minute to find the handout, then say, Take a few moments to look back at your own ideas and the ideas you recorded of this unit. Students have had
from others for tsunami detection, warning, and reducing damage. Think about what we now know about tsunamis. Which engineering design experience
designs for detection, warning, and reducing damage do you think are still promising? Place a sticky dot next to any ideas you in the Unit 6.2: How can containers
think might be worth investing time and resources into. keep stuff from warming up or
cooling down? (Cup Design Unit).
Give students a minute or two to work individually. Then say, Turn to a partner and share one idea you marked with a Use that previous experience
sticky dot in your handout. to remind them that engineers
As students finish sharing, summarize the lesson by saying, Our next steps will include examining and evaluating existing design solutions to mitigate the
solutions to determine how well they protect people and property during a tsunami. effects of natural hazards using
scientific principles, and that those
design solutions must go through
rigorous evaluation to determine
how well they meet criteria and
constraints. Beginning in Lesson 5,
students will use criteria and
constraints to evaluate a variety
of tsunami detection, warning, and
mitigation systems designed by
engineers to protect people and
property.
Core Vocabulary
Core Vocabulary: Core Vocabulary terms Language of Instruction: The Language of A Glossary at the end of the Science Literacy
are those that students should learn to use Instruction consists of additional terms, not Student Reader lists definitions for Core
accurately in discussion and in written responses. considered a part of Core Vocabulary, that you Vocabulary and selected Language of Instruction.
During facilitation of learning, expose students should use when talking about any concepts
repeatedly to these terms. However, these in this exercise. Students will benefit from your
terms are not intended for isolated drill or modeling the use of these words without the
memorization. expectation that students will use or explain the
pandemic words themselves.
1. Plan ahead.
Determine your pacing to introduce the reading selections, check in with students on their progress, and discuss the
reading content and writing exercise. If you are performing Science Literacy as a structured, weekly routine, you might
implement a schedule like this:
• Monday: Designate a ten-minute period at the beginning of the week to introduce students to the assignment.
• Wednesday: Plan to touch base briefly with students in the middle of the week to answer questions about the
reading, to clarify expectations about the writing exercise, and to help students stay on track.
• Friday: Set aside time at the end of the week to facilitate a discussion about the reading and the writing exercise.
You’ll proceed with the in-class lesson investigations during this week.
• Let students know they will read independently and then complete a short writing assignment. The reading
selection relates to topics they are presently exploring in their Natural Hazards unit science investigations.
• The reading and writing will be completed outside of class (unless you have available class time to allocate).
• Preview the reading. Share a short summary of what students can expect.
First, you will read how scientists build models to predict how much time it will take a tsunami to travel from its source
to shorelines around the world.
Next, you’ll read a mock ask-a-scientist newspaper feature to learn how the shapes of tsunamis differ from other water
waves.
Then, you’ll read a fictitious blog post from a person who complains that all bad weather is blamed on climate change
and that this shouldn’t be so. Then someone posts a comment to present another viewpoint.
You’ll also read an article about an earthquake fault zone right along the coast of California, Oregon, and Washington.
The author presents evidence to support the claim that the fault is the source of strong earthquakes and tsunamis
about every 243 years.
Finally, you’ll take a close look at some graphs produced by epidemiologists that attempt to forecast the impact of a
pandemic.
• Distribute Exercise Page 2. Preview the writing exercise. Share a summary of what students will be expected to Exercise Page
deliver. Emphasize that Science Literacy exercises are brief. The focus is on thoughtful quality of a small product, not
on the assignment being big and complex.
For this assignment you will be expected to generate an infographic highlighting several mathematical ideas presented
in this collection. EP 2
• Remind students of helpful strategies they can employ during independent reading. Offer the following advice:
The reading should take approximately 30 minutes to complete. (Encourage students to break reading into smaller
sections over multiple short sittings if their attention wanders.)
A good reading strategy is to scan through the collection first to see the titles, section headers, graphics, and images to
see what the selections are going to be about before fully reading.
Next, “cold read” the selections without yet thinking about the writing assignment that will follow.
Then, carefully read the Exercise Page to understand the expectations for the writing part of the assignment.
Revisit the reading selections to complete the writing exercise.
Jot down any questions for the midweek progress check in class. (Be sure students know, though, that they are not
limited to that time to ask you for clarification or answers to questions.)
Touch base midweek with students to make sure they are on track while working independently. You may choose to
administer a midweek minute-quiz to give students a concrete reason not to postpone completing the reading until
the last minute. Ask questions such as these, and have students jot answers on a half sheet of paper:
Ask a few brief discussion questions related to the reading that will help students tie the text content to students’
classroom investigations.
Facilitate class discussion about the reading collection and writing exercise. Students begin the reading activity with an
article explaining how scientists use and improve models to forecast when a tsunami will strike specific land areas. Two Student Reader
other selections in the collection are related to tsunamis. The remaining two explore forecasts of storms and pandemics.
Pages 14–17
Collection 2
Suggested prompts Sample student responses
What is the general purpose of the first selection, It describes models that are used to predict the arrival times of
“Tsunami Models”? tsunamis and shows how to graph their accuracy. SUPPORT—If you are using the
recommended word envelope
According to the image that shows the arrival times clear across the Pacific Ocean and even around the tip of South convention, check the envelope
of the first wave how far can a tsunami wave travel? Africa to reach coasts along the Atlantic Ocean to see if it contains any words,
How would scientists determine the accuracy of the They would need to compare the arrival time values on the model phrases, or sentences that students
simulation of first wave arrival times? with the actual arrival times for that tsunami. need help understanding. Read
key sentences aloud, and provide
What is the general purpose of the second selection, It uses an ask-a-scientist format to explain why the height of a concise explanation.
“Dear Scientist Column”? tsunami depends on where it hits the shore.
How does the second selection help you build The first article explains how scientists predict the time when a
Online Resources
knowledge on top of what you learned in the first tsunami wave will arrive at different coastlines. The second article
selection? focuses on the height and shape of the tsunami when it hits
different coastlines.
After reading the definition of amplitude in the probably at sea level where the water is flat
“Word to Know” box, explain where the resting
point of a tsunami wave is located.
Use the checklist provided on the Exercise Page to supply feedback to each student.
SCIENCE LITERACY: READING COLLECTION 2 NATURAL HAZARDS | 111
LESSON 5
This Lesson We revisit the coastal communities of Japan affected by the 2011 tsunami to see
what solutions were used to protect them and what other existing solutions could be
Investigation
evaluated for future use. We define our problem and identify criteria and constraints for
3 days the solutions based on community needs. We evaluate each solution using a systematic
process to determine which ones might be most promising for these communities.
We consider what it means for a solution to be promising for one community versus
another, and what technologies are needed if the solution in place fails.
Next Lesson We will read about a complex system of instruments used to detect tsunamis. We will learn that tsunami warnings are only sent when
specific criteria are met regarding the triggering earthquake event and whether the resulting tsunami is predicted to reach land.
12 8 min ORGANIZE INFORMATION INTO THE DECISION MATRIX Q-R Tsunami Solution Ranking Cards, Decision
Use the matrix to reorganize useful information for evaluating the solutions and Matrix OR Completed Decision Matrix
decide which one(s) may be best for Ryoishi.
Review teacher guide, slides, and teacher references or keys (if applicable).
Make copies of handouts and ensure sufficient copies of student references, readings, and procedures are available.
Ensure that you can play the following videos:
• Fisherman’s Story. 6.5 - Lesson 5 Fisherman’s Experience (See the Online Resources Guide for a link to this item.
www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources)
Materials: What happened in Ryoishi Bay?, computer, projector, 6.5 - Lesson 5 Fisherman’s Experience (See the Online * Attending to Equity
Resources Guide for a link to this item. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources), Tsunami Chain of Events Supporting Emerging
poster Multilingual Learners:
Revisit tsunami pictures and introduce Ryoishi. Display slide B. Remind students that we viewed pictures of The Lexile estimate of this
tsunami locations with seawalls in Lesson 1. Tell them that the images on the slide are of a different place in Japan that reading is 810L-1000L. Provide
was also struck by the tsunami in 2011. Point out the green crane and explain that this picture is from near Ryoishi, a opportunities for emerging
small fishing village on the coast of Japan. Say, In this village, it was believed that the seawall should have been able to multilingual students to break
withstand a tsunami, but it unfortunately failed. Because we are interested in some type of barrier or wall as a solution, let’s down the meaning of scientific
read a short case study and then watch a video to learn about what happened in Ryoishi. words used in the lesson. Provide
Additional Guidance
At this point, students should be able to identify relevant characteristics of a tsunami that they need to account for
when evaluating solutions. These characteristics come from the Tsunami Chain of Events poster built across Lessons
2-4. If students need assistance, reference the poster to help them make connections between the science ideas
they learned and what occurred in Ryoishi. Help students pull out the specifics they have learned about wave height,
energy, earthquake depth and magnitude, and location.
Materials: Evaluating Solutions to Protect Communities from Tsunamis, chart paper, markers * Supporting Students in
Consider how to evaluate existing solutions for Ryoishi. Say, We know that Ryoishi had a seawall that failed. There Engaging in Argument from
may be other options for protecting communities like Ryoshi from tsunamis in the future. When examining these solutions, Evidence
maybe we can create something like a rubric or checklist to determine which might be a better solution for this community. To evaluate competing solutions,
Ask students the following questions: the class needs to agree on what
the problem is and identify the
• What would a solution need to be able to do to reduce damage in Ryoishi? criteria and constraints they will
• Why would it be helpful to create a rubric or checklist to help us evaluate different solutions? need to consider in order to solve
Let a few students share initial ideas. Support them in determining that a rubric or checklist could be used to the problem. An important aspect
evaluate how well each design meets the needs of the community and then use the findings as evidence for future of developing the practice of
recommendations. argumentation is developing and
sharing their initial ideas, so that
Define the problem and considerations for a solution. Display slide E. Distribute Evaluating Solutions to Protect the class can consider differing
Communities from Tsunamis to each student. Explain that the handout will help us decide what to consider when perspectives and priorities across
evaluating potential solutions for Ryoishi. Give students 3 minutes to record their answers to the questions in Part 1 the class, work toward agreement
of the handout. Then ask the class to share what ideas they have proposed. The class should work toward agreement on defining key criteria and
on defining the problem and what the solution needs to do.* Sample prompts and responses for this discussion are constraints, and then analyze the
below. solutions to determine whether
they meet the relevant criteria and
Suggested prompts Sample student responses
constraints.
What do we know about Ryoishi that helps us understand It is right on the bay.
why the community is at risk for tsunamis? The area has been hit by a tsunami before and people have
rebuilt in the same area.
What is the problem we are trying to solve? Ryoishi’s seawall failed during the 2011 tsunami, even
though everyone thought it was safe. We need to consider
other potential solutions for Ryoishi.
What is something we think our solution should do during We need it to block waves from hitting the village.
the tsunami to protect Ryoishi? We need a solution that pushes the wave back out to the
ocean.
We need a solution that is really tall and can block really
high waves.
Waves of that magnitude have a lot of energy—we need a
solution that will reduce the energy.
Additional Guidance
During Lesson 1, students implicitly used criteria and constraints to guide the development and evaluation of their
initial designs. They have also previously developed and tested designs using predefined criteria and constraints in the
Cup Design Unit. In this lesson, we use language to make these criteria and constraints explicit when talking about the
existing solutions. At this point, we talk about the specific criteria that a solution must meet, such as not letting water
from a wave get past it. Later in the lesson, we will identify constraints that limit the types of solutions that can be used
in a particular community. If students have not done Cup Design Unit prior to this unit, you will need to provide additional
time to develop their understanding of criteria.
Now that the class has a better idea of the criteria to consider when evaluating solutions, explain that we can evaluate
and compare these solutions to see how well they meet these criteria.
4. Watch an engineering test video and evaluate solutions against our criteria. 15 min
Materials: Evaluating Solutions to Protect Communities from Tsunamis, computer, projector, 6.5 - Lesson 5 Testing Wave
Blocking Designs (See the Online Resources Guide for a link to this item. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online- * Supporting Students in
resources), Evaluating Existing Solutions chart, markers, Oysters Clean the Bay! (Filtration Time-Lapse) (See the Online Developing and Using Scale,
Resources Guide for a link to this item. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources) (optional) Proportion, and Quantity
Although scale models were used
Introduce the video of an engineer testing solutions. Say, So we know our goal for a solution for Ryoishi is to keep
in Unit 6.4: What causes Earth’s
both the people and the village safe. There are several solutions advertised by engineers to reduce the impacts of a tsunami.
surface to change? (Everest Unit),
We have a video of an engineer we can watch testing scale models of each solution to see how effective they are.** We can
this can be a great opportunity to
then use this data to compare the designs.
remind students that scale models
Assess the source of the information. Project slide F and have students read the text in Part 3 of Evaluating help us observe and investigate
Solutions to Protect Communities from Tsunamis to learn about the source of the video. Ask students these questions to systems that are normally too large
determine whether the source is providing reliable information:
Materials: index card or science notebook, Evaluating Existing Solutions chart, markers * Attending to Equity
Discuss a rating scale to compare existing solutions. Display slide I. Say, We have observed several different solutions. Support for Universal Design for
How could we rate them in a way that clearly communicates to others how well they meet the criteria? From your experience, Learning:
what rating systems do other individuals and companies use that can be easily understood and shared with others? The five-star rating scale was
Students will respond with a variety of ideas but will likely identify the five-star rating system used by many retailers purposely chosen for this lesson
and consumers, with 5 being best and 1 being worst.* If not, prompt them with, When you or someone you know buys a because it is widely used and likely
product, have you ever seen a star rating scale? What would a five-star rating indicate? What would a one-star rating indicate? familiar to students. For students
Compare the solutions’ performance using a five-star rating scale. Work with the class to determine ratings out who may struggle with language
of 5 for each solution and record them on the Evaluating Existing Solutions chart. These ratings will allow for a relative or symbolism, they may benefit
comparison of each solution on each criterion. from a visual reminder in class
that describes one-star versus
Project slide J. Give each student an index card, or have them use their science notebook, to write their thinking in five-star, such as “Did not perform
response to this exit ticket: Is keeping water from getting to the community the only criterion we need to consider? Is there well” or “Worst performance” and
anything else we need to consider when determining which solution would work better than others for Ryoishi? “Performed very well” or “Best
• If yes, explain why. performance,” respectively. This
• If no, list other ideas for consideration. rating scale can be modified as
desired to use another symbol,
format, or text to provide
Additional Guidance
greater accessibility through
representation.
Use this exit ticket to analyze students’ thinking regarding additional criteria or constraints that we should consider.
This thinking will be used to start day 2.
End of day 1
Materials: None
Surface additional considerations in choosing a solution. Display slide J again. Refer to the exit tickets from day
1 and ask students to share some of their ideas for additional things that need to be considered before making a
decision for Ryoishi. Students will likely bring up ideas such as these:
• Ryoishi residents might prefer one solution over another, or be able to afford one but not another.
• Ryoishi residents might need a solution that can protect them while maintaining their ability to access the water,
because they are a fishing community.
• Ryoishi might have some other issue that might impact how a solution functions in the area.
Materials: Evaluating Solutions to Protect Communities from Tsunamis, Comparing Ryoishi to Nearby Communities, chart
paper, markers, (See the Online Resources Guide for a link to this item. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-
resources) Where did people live in Ryoishi
before the tsunami?
Consider issues that might limit possible solutions for Ryoishi. Display slide K. Ask students to turn and talk
The following pictures show how Ryoishi
grew after the 1933 tsunami, and how the
housing changed from 1948 to 2010. The
briefly about this question: If we only consider our own criteria when evaluating solutions, will we be picking the best overall
red line shows where floodwaters settled
after the 1933 tsunami occurred. once
the seawall was constructed (shown by
solution for Ryoishi? Why or why not? Record these onto Part 4 of the handout.
the dotted line) in 1977, people moved
closer to the ocean. The people of Ryoishi
assumed the area would be safe from
future tsunami events.
Have students share their ideas. They should respond that while we might pick the best device based upon our criteria, Ryoishi and the 2011 tsunami
In 2011, the village was struck by another tsunami. The tsunami traveled at speeds of up to 500
it might not work for the people who live there, and might impact their lives and jobs as fishermen. Tell the class that
miles per hour, but slowed down as it approached the shore. The seawall was hit by 60-65 foot
waves, which went up and over the structure. The seawall broke under the weight and force of
the water, causing water to rush into the community. Ninety-six percent of all the boats in the
we have another reading about Ryoishi and the surrounding areas that might help us understand more about the
area were destroyed. Most homes in the red area (see the image above) were wiped out by the
water. After the 2011 tsunami, people eventually started to build in the red area again (as seen in
the images on slide C).
also note anything that might affect which solution would work best for Ryoishi’s residents.
READING | What haPPEnED in RyoiShi Bay? 97
Additional Guidance
If time allows, show students this video about the breakwater in Kamaishi. (See the Online Resources Guide for a link
to this item. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources.)
Reintroduce the word “constraints.” Remind students that back in our Cup Design Unit, we used the term
“constraints,” and that today we have been brainstorming constraints. Say, Alright, we have identified some additional
features of any potential solution that might narrow down which solution is possible for Ryoishi. We call these additional
features you have identified “constraints” because they constrain or limit what solution is possible for the community. Some
of these constraints may also affect how well the proposed solutions could function.
Add constraints to the Word Wall.
Chart student ideas. Write the title “Constraints for Solutions” on a blank sheet of chart paper and post it alongside
the day 1 Criteria for Solutions chart. Ask students to share out some of the potential constraints they listed in their
handout while you record them on the chart—these can be formed as questions or statements (not all of these will
come up initially):
• Will it affect fishing? (impact on boat traffic for fishing)
• Can the residents afford it? (cost)
• Does it block their access to the ocean? (economy—fishing or tourism)
Materials: Existing Solutions for Coastal Communities, Criteria for Solutions chart, Constraints for Solutions chart, markers
Revisit criteria and constraints on class charts. Remind students that we have developed a class Criteria for
Solutions chart and Constraints for Solutions chart. Revisit these charts and ask students if they want to add any other
constraints that were referenced in the reading.
Additional Guidance
Building a strong list of criteria and constraints, based on scientific principles and community needs, is important for
students to evaluate the existing solutions, and, in particular, how well they might work for Ryoishi. Direct students to
look back at Existing Solutions for Coastal Communities if they are struggling to find something to add. If students are
not able to bring out these ideas, elicit them with prompts like these:
• Cost: Some of these solutions seem expensive. Can any community afford them, or do we need to consider
something else?
• Time to build: We know tsunamis in the area happened without much warning. Do we know if we have a lot of
time to build these structures?
• Maintenance: Some of these structures seem to require upkeep. Is that important for these communities to consider?
• Environmental impact: As we were looking at the solutions, we saw mangroves. Why are we considering
mangroves if they don’t seem to do as well against a tsunami? What are the specific characteristics of that solution
that may be important criteria?
• Blocking ocean views: We looked at the breakwater idea in the last class. Why do some people not like it? Should
that be an important criterion too?
• Impact on boats and traffic: We learned that breakwaters can block entry to ports. Is that an important
consideration for solutions in some communities?
Community Stakeholders
Part 1. Identify the stakeholders and their needs.
Consider the following:
Orient students to the decision matrix. Project slide P. Distribute a copy of Decision Matrix to each student. Explain
• Who are the people that live in places where tsunamis might happen?
• Will they need special help during a tsunami? Describe those needs.
• Who can help them?
Who is this Will they Describe their needs. Who can help them?
that this tool, called a decision matrix, will help us better evaluate the existing solutions by providing a way to
community need special
member? help during a
(Stakeholders) tsunami?
☐ yes ☐ no
systematically rank each solution by its scores on our criterion and constraints—which will help us better determine
☐ yes ☐ no
☐ yes ☐ no
☐ yes ☐ no
the best solution for Ryoishi. Part 2. Define the problem and the goals of a tsunami communication system.
What is the problem that engineers are trying to solve in developing a tsunami communication system?
Complete matrix examples as a class. Project slide Q. Tell students that we will use the solution ranking cards to add
all the ratings for each solution to the matrix. After we have added all of the solution cards to the chart, we can more What would that system need to do to address all the needs of the community members?
easily see how the criterion and individual constraints compare across the solutions. Explain that we will practice filling
in the matrix by doing a few examples together.
41
Alternate Activity
If time is projected to be short on day 3, a prefilled matrix is completed on the alternate handout, Completed Decision
Matrix. The column headers currently reflect the criteria and constraints from the solution cards, but should be
adapted between day 2 and day 3 to include any additional class-agreed-upon criteria and constraints, along with
changing any wording to reflect what students think the headers should be based upon the class charts from day 2. To
allow for additional time on day 3, this modified and completed chart can be distributed at the beginning of class on
day 3. Although it may feel convenient to skip using Decision Matrix on day 2, it is still recommended to complete part
of the matrix with students to help build their understanding of what each row and column means and should look
like before they presented with a completed matrix on day 3.
Explain to students that in the next class, we will continue the process of evaluating the solutions by comparing their
ratings in our matrix.
End of day 2
Materials: Tsunami Solution Ranking Cards, Decision Matrix OR Completed Decision Matrix
Revisit the task from the previous class. Project slide Q again. Ask students what we were doing at the end of the
last class, and what our next steps are. They should say that we need to add the rest of our solutions’ ratings to our
decision matrix. Have students gather in their small groups.
If a version of Completed Decision Matrix was constructed as an Evaluating the solution against our criterion and constraints:
Solution Criterion Constraint 1 Constraint 2 Constraint 3 Constraint 4 Constraint 5 Constraint 6 * Supporting Students in
alternative to completing Decision Matrix, distribute the handout A. Wall-
Break waves
3
Impact on boats Impact on
5
marine life
4
Impact on
ocean view
1
Cost
3
Time to build
3
Maintenance
take out their solution cards and their copy of Decision Matrix and on developing the practice of
Rock armor
F. Breakwater- 4 4 2 5 1 2 4
Submerged
complete the matrix. Remind them that the higher the rating, the breakwater
G. Natural 3 5 5 4 4 1 4 argumentation. They are weighing
vegetation-
slide R. The slide provides guidance on how to navigate making solutions to figure out which
a group decision about which solution(s) would best protect Ryoishi. Ask students to talk within their groups about solution may or may not be most
which solution seems best by looking from column to column in the matrix and comparing the solutions’ criterion and appropriate for this community.
They will struggle to come to
TEACHER RESOURCES NATURAL HAZARDS | 253
Materials: Decision Matrix OR Completed Decision Matrix, Comparing Ryoishi to Nearby Communities, Evaluating Existing * Supporting Students in
Solutions chart, chart paper, markers Engaging in Argument from
Convene a Scientists Circle. Have students bring their completed matrix handout to the circle, and sit next to Evidence
someone from another group if possible; this will allow rankings from best to worst to be shared across multiple In the practice of argumentation,
groups in the next step. Ask students to look at the Evaluating Existing Solutions chart and make initial observations students evaluate the evidence
regarding the sticky dots’ distribution. Reflect on the point that not everyone agreed on the same solution. Wonder at hand and decide whether it
aloud with students why this happened. supports or refutes one or more
Turn and talk to compare initial decisions for Ryoishi.* Project slide T. Have students turn and talk to a partner claims. This practice is particularly
about the following prompts: beneficial for students to develop
as they are evaluating competing
• Looking at your matrix, which solution did you or your group think would work best for Ryoishi? solutions. It is not important that
• Why do you think that is the best solution? they come to the “one correct
Share chosen solutions as a class. Elicit responses from the circle. Remind answer,” but rather that they sort
students that even though we are trying to pick the best solution for the through and weigh the evidence
area, each solution was designed to help reduce the impacts of a tsunami. As and reasoning from their data
the first student shares their chosen solution and their reasoning, record their and their peers, to consider why
solution and reasoning on the chart paper. If they have trouble identifying certain solutions hold more or less
or remembering their reasoning from the previous class, direct them to look promise for one community versus
back at their matrix to determine how they made their choice. another.
Ask if anyone else identified a different solution that they think would work
to meet Ryoishi’s needs, or chose the same solution but for a different reason.
Have additional students also share their choice and their reasoning, and
record these on the chart paper. Then ask, Why would we identify different
solutions to protect Ryoishi if we were all using the same ratings?
Discuss why the chosen solutions differ. Engage students in a discussion of what could have led to
selecting different solutions, even though we all have the same ratings in our matrices. Ask guiding
questions such as these:
• What did you consider as you made your choice?
• I heard group ________ say that they chose _________ as the best fitting solution. Why would that have been different
than group _______?
• Group ____ also debated two solutions. Did any other groups debate a different solution? Why was there any debate if we
all have the same ratings?
• Did any groups have trouble coming to a consensus? What made your decision difficult to make?
Establish the importance of valuing different constraints. Facilitate a brief discussion to help students realize that
they were placing more or less value on certain constraints than others, which led to different decisions about which
solution might best fit Ryoishi. If students do not immediately point this out, redirect them to look at the chart that
was just made and consider what reasoning was given for the different answers.
LESSON 5 NATURAL HAZARDS | 134
Consider why choosing a solution can be challenging in real life. Explain that engineers make these value
decisions when considering potential solutions to problems. Push students to consider why not settling on one
solution can be challenging for engineers. Example prompts and responses are below.
Assessment Opportunity
Building towards: 5.A Make an oral argument based on a systematic evaluation process using relevant scientific
principles, to support or refute the ability of different existing solutions (structure) to mitigate the effects of tsunamis
and meet the needs of at-risk communities (function).
What to look for/listen for: Listen for students to use criteria and constraints to evaluate existing tsunami-mitigation
solutions using a systematic process that accounts for community needs and the stated performance of the design
solutions. Important ideas include:
1. The design solution must account for relevant scientific principles (e.g., it dissipates the wave’s energy), the needs of
the community (e.g., economic activity), how well the structure would function for surrounding communities (how
well it will function in this scenario vs. its proposed functionality), and its environmental impacts (e.g., on marine life).
2. Clearly defining and prioritizing criteria and constraints is necessary when evaluating and choosing a solution for a
given community.
3. Communities have different criteria and constraints, so the evaluation process should also consider impacts on
neighboring communities. Students should realize that the proposed performance of a structure in one area may
affect other areas in ways that might negate the intended result, such as the seawall at Kamaishi having a negative
effect on Ryoishi.
Materials: Comparing Ryoishi to Nearby Communities, Decision Matrix OR Completed Decision Matrix, Evaluating Existing
Solutions chart, markers
Remind ourselves of Ryoishi’s needs with a partner reading. Redistribute Comparing Ryoishi to Nearby Communities
to each student. Say, We still don’t seem to be in agreement about what solution might work the best for the area. Last class,
we learned more about Ryoishi and considered what the community’s criteria and constraints might be. Let’s reread this text
with a partner to think critically about what criteria and constraints might be more important for Ryoishi than others.
Project slide U. While partners are reading, draw a vertical line on the bottom of the Evaluating Existing Solutions
chart, and label the left section “Criteria/constraints important to Ryoishi” and the right section “Possible
complications.”
After 3 minutes, lead a class discussion to determine what criteria might be most important to Ryoishi, and if any other
factors make the Ryoishi problem more complicated than simply ranking criteria and constraints. As students offer
criteria, list them on the left side of the chart. Record possible complications on the right side. Example prompts and
responses are below:
Introduce primary and secondary criteria and constraints. Say, When engineers work on these problems, they need
to prioritize their criteria and constraints for different communities, just like we did. We can define primary and secondary
criteria and constraints to help us determine which are most important and should be given more weight when evaluating
solutions. Primary criteria or constraints are the most important things to consider, while secondary criteria or constraints are
still important, but should be considered after the most important ones.
Add primary criteria/constraints and secondary criteria/constraints to the Word Wall.
Assign primary and secondary criteria and constraints. Project slide V. Instruct students to look at their decision
matrix and to star or circle the most important criteria and constraints for Ryoishi.
Add engineering ideas and solutions to the Tsunami Chain of Events poster. Point out that so far, we have used
one sticky note color on the poster to represent what we know as scientists. Because we are adding what we can do
as engineers, we should indicate that with a different color sticky note. Add an item to the key that denotes the color
change for a new section of sticky notes titled, “What we can do as engineers.”
Add a sticky note of the new color that says “Build structures that break up and/or blocks the wave” under the sticky
note that says “As wave nears the shore, its height (amplitude) builds.” Draw an arrow from the old note to the new one
to represent that this engineering idea and science idea are connected. The Tsunami Chain of Events poster may now
look like this:
This Lesson In this lesson, we read about how tsunamis are detected using a complex system of
instruments set up on land (seismometers), the ocean surface (surface buoys), and the ocean
Investigation
floor (tsunameters), as well as in space (satellites). We read that tsunami warnings are sent
only when specific sets of criteria are met. The first set involves the location, strength, and
1 day
depth of the detected earthquake. The second involves whether the tsunami is expected to
reach land.
NOAA
Next Lesson We will listen to tsunami warning signals and read accounts of tsunami survivors from Japan and what they did when an
earthquake and tsunami occurred. We will identify community stakeholders, develop criteria and constraints for tsunami
communication solutions, and evaluate different ways tsunami preparation and response are communicated. We will read a case
study about a school in Kamaishi that included education as part of their plan. From this we will learn that there are many ways to
communicate with community stakeholders before and during a tsunami event.
Review teacher guide, slides, and teacher references or keys (if applicable).
Make copies of handouts and ensure sufficient copies of student references, readings, and procedures are available.
Display posters from Lesson 1:
• Detect Tsunamis poster
• Warn People poster
• Reduce Damage poster
Students also need to retrieve Lesson 1’s handout, Tsunami: Japan 2011, from their science notebook.
Be sure you have materials ready to add words to the Word Wall. After the reading, add or review the following terms:
• Words we encounter: seismometer, tsunameter, buoy, satellite, sonar
• Words we apply from previous lessons or units: epicenter, magnitude
1. Navigation 5 min
Materials: science notebook, Tsunami: Japan 2011 (from Lesson 1), Detect Tsunamis poster, Warn People poster,
Reduce Damage poster (all from Lesson 1)
Recall the Ryoishi case study. Project slide A. Have students revisit What happened in Ryoishi Bay? from Lesson 5.
Ask them to recall what they found out about how the tsunami impacted Ryoishi. Prompts and examples of student
responses are below.
If students struggle to recall their thinking around which ideas were promising and which were challenging, prompt
them to review Part 4 in Tsunami: Japan 2011 from Lesson 1, day 2. This handout instructed students to select one idea
as promising and one as challenging, and to explain their rationale. For further guidance, prompt them to look back
at the Criteria for Solutions chart and Constraints for Solutions chart from Lesson 5, which explored the criteria and
constraints of several design solutions.
2. Do a close reading on how tsunamis are detected and warning signals sent. 25 min
Materials: Reading: How are tsunamis detected and warning signals sent? *Attending to Equity
Introduce the reading. Distribute Reading: How are tsunamis detected and warning signals sent? to each student. The Supporting Universal Design for
Lexile reading estimate of this passage is 810L-1000L. A full-color version of the reading and a close-up of the map are Learning: Teachers can support
also included in the student edition. Project slide B. As a class, use 5 minutes to set the purpose for this activity. Say, all students in forming a deeper
Let’s make sure we know what our purpose is for reading the article. Prompts and examples of responses are below. understanding of newly “earned”
vocabulary by representing the
Suggested prompt Sample student responses new term in several ways. For
example, students can (1) write the
What do we want to know more about? What might this We want to know more about ways to prepare for tsunamis
term, (2) draw a representation of
reading help us figure out? that do not involve building large seawalls.
the term, (3) use their own words
We want to know more about how we detect tsunamis so to write an explanation for what
we can warn people. the term means, and (4) use the
Have students write the purpose for reading the article at the top of their handout, as follows: How are tsunamis new term in a sentence.
detected and warning signals sent? This strategy is particularly helpful for
emerging multilingual students.
Additional Guidance
After the reading, ask students which terms they would like to add to the Word Wall. If the term is new for students,
categorize it as a “word we encounter.” If it was used in a previous unit, list it under “words from a previous lesson or
unit”. For the term to be considered a “word we earn”, students should be able to connect its meaning to the larger
ideas discussed in the unit thus far.
Terms you might consider adding during this lesson include:
• Words we encounter: seismometer, tsunameter, buoy, satellite, sonar
• Words from a previous lesson or unit: epicenter, magnitude
Many of the terms in this reading are specific parts of a tsunami warning system. It is more important for students to
understand the system overall, and to see that each piece is designed to fulfill certain criteria. Because these specific
terms will likely not apply to many other hazards, it is not essential to remember them, and thus they may remain as
words we encounter. However, if students begin to discuss and use the terminology around the specific instruments
later in the lesson, consider shifting these words to be words we earn.
The term epicenter was encountered in Unit 6.4: What causes Earth’s surface to change? (Everest Unit), and magnitude in
Lessons 2 and 3 of this unit. In this lesson, students add to their understanding of these terms in the context of tsunamis.
Alternate Activity
The reading introduces several devices and technologies involved in tsunami detection. Although students may
have limited firsthand experience with such instruments, they can access simplified versions of them through free
applications on digital devices.
For example, “Hamm Seismograph” (freely available on iOS and Android devices) can be used to graphically display
vibrations associated with seismic waves caused by earthquakes. By holding and moving a digital device in multiple
directions and at different frequencies, students can mimic earthquakes of varying magnitudes.
Observing how the energy associated with an earthquake is translated into a visual display gives students a more
concrete sense of what a seismometer measures and the role it plays in the tsunami detection system discussed in the
reading. Alternatively, some local science museums display examples of seismometers which detect vibrations in the
floor as patrons walk, run, or jump nearby.
Key Ideas
Purpose of this discussion: Help students identify one design idea and potential trade-offs in the detection and
signaling technologies used for tsunamis.
Look for/listen for these ideas: Keeping the tsunameter in “sleep” mode vs. “active” mode is a design feature with
these trade-offs:
• Keeping the tsunameter in “sleep” mode when not needed prolongs the lifespan of the instrument’s power source.
• Changing batteries in the tsunameter entails bringing the instrument to the surface, which is a difficult, long, and
expensive process.
• Changing batteries in the tsunameter by sending a person or submersible down to the ocean floor is costly and
very dangerous.
Lesson 6 NATURAL HAZARDS | 147
3. Summarize ideas from the reading. 8 min
Materials: Reading: How are tsunamis detected and warning signals sent? *Supporting Students in Three-
Summarize ideas from the reading.* Project slide D. Prompt students to think about the main pieces of Dimensional Learning
information presented in the reading. Guide them to first look back at their annotated text and briefly discuss This text represents an opportunity
the three questions on the slide with their partner. Tell them we will then discuss these questions as a class. to integrate aspects of the
Say, Remember, because we saw that big structures like seawalls don’t always protect people from a tsunami, we wanted three dimensions of the NGSS.
to know more about how we detect tsunamis so that we could warn people in case one is coming. What do people need to Students obtain and communicate
know in order to prepare for a tsunami? Examples of student responses to this prompt are below. information from the text about
a system (the overall network
Suggested prompt Sample student responses of sensors across land, space,
and sea), and subsystems (the
What do people need to know in order to They need to know if an earthquake that may cause a tsunami has tsunameter and how it operates on
prepare for a tsunami? occurred. the ocean floor) that are focused
They need to know if a tsunami is getting closer. on detection and warning of
earthquakes and tsunamis. These
They need to know when a tsunami may arrive so they know how much
systems have their own criteria
time we have to evacuate.
and trade-offs that impact how
They need to know how bad the tsunami will be, so they know if we need well they work. Through critically
to evacuate. reading about the system and its
They need to know how tall and fast the tsunami is to determine how parts, students can gain a better
and when to warn people. understanding of how the system
works to protect communities.
Prompt students to read and think about the second question on slide D. Say, What must a tsunami detection and
warning system be able to do? Examples of student responses are below.
Assessment Opportunity
Building towards: 6.A Critically read scientific text to understand how a system designed to detect tsunamis follows
specific criteria (related to earthquake activity) and constraints (related to signal transmission).
What to look for/listen for: After the third paragraph in the reading, students should understand that this tsunami
detection system is only triggered if an earthquake meets specific criteria (the earthquake must be underwater, strong,
and shallow). After the fifth paragraph, they should identify one constraint of the system, as the signals must be able to
travel through air, water, and space, thus requiring the use of both satellite and sonar signals. Finally, in the “How does
a tsunameter work” paragraph, students should offer a range of explanations for why the tsunameter is designed to
have both “sleep” and “active” modes, including that the instrument uses more power while active, which may reduce
its effective lifetime. They should identify this as a constraint on the system.
What to do: If students struggle to identify criteria and constraints in the tsunami detection system, pause and reflect
on how these have been discussed up to this point. To help specifically with the tsunameter in “sleep” and “active”
mode, make the analogy to whether a person requires more energy when they are asleep or when they are active. If
they struggle to see why energy consumption is problematic, have them consider where the instrument gets energy
to function: First, ask where most appliances or machines get their energy. Then, ask how getting energy down to the
tsunameter many thousands of meters below the ocean surface may be problematic (i.e., its location is completely
dark, freezing, and under immense pressure). Finally, ask students to think about this in terms of cost and danger (i.e.,
Why might extending the life of a tsunameter be better than having one that is always in active mode? Why is it not safe to
send people down to replace the batteries?).
Materials: science notebook, Tsunami Chain of Events poster, markers, large sticky notes
Update the Tsunami Chain of Events poster. Project slide E. Explain that we will add new information from the
reading to the Tsunami Chain of Events poster.
Say, Remember that this unit is not just about the 2011 tsunami, but also about designing ways to protect communities from
tsunamis. Therefore, understanding the connection between science and engineering is critical. One way to keep track of
After displaying the Tsunami Chain of Events poster, ask, As we look back at this chain of events, at which points do you
think a tsunami detection and warning system might play an important role? Are there certain parts of the tsunami detection
and warning system that you think connect to more than one part of this diagram?
Ask students to share their ideas for possible connections. Record ideas onto the chart using large sticky notes—be
sure to use the same color sticky notes as those added in Lesson 5 to indicate that these connections involve aspects
of engineering designs. Prompts and examples of student responses are below.
Regarding the diagram, keep in mind that the number and types of connections shared by students may vary. It is not
essential for the class chart to look exactly like the example provided. It is more important that students be able to
identify a moment (or moments) within the chain of events when the use of a tsunami detection and warning system
may be most useful in protecting communities.
5. Navigation 2 min
Materials: None
Motivate the next step. Display slide F. Guide students to think about what happens once a tsunami is detected and
predicted to impact land. Say, So, an earthquake has occurred in the ocean, and the DART II system has accurately and
quickly signaled that a tsunami is approaching. The local government is about to issue a tsunami warning to people nearby.
What should we be concerned with at this step?
Focus on responses associated with the communication of the warning. For example, how soon should the warning be
sent? Do they wait for more information? How do they send out the message? What is in the message? All these ideas
set students up to think more about the technologies, criteria, and constraints involved in communicating before and
during a tsunami.
This Lesson We listen to what a tsunami warning signal sounds like and notice and wonder about
how people know what to do when they hear it. We read real accounts of tsunami
Investigation
survivors from Japan and what they did when the earthquake and tsunami occurred.
We identify the stakeholders who the warning signal must work for, and then develop
2 days
criteria and constraints for tsunami communication solutions. We evaluate different
ways tsunami preparation and response are communicated to stakeholders and also
read a case study about a school in Kamaishi that included education as part of their
plan. From this, we learn that there are many ways to communicate with community
stakeholders before and during a tsunami event.
Next Lesson We will develop a system model to represent what we’ve learned about detecting, warning people, and reducing damage from
tsunamis. We will analyze the importance and purpose of the subsystems and generalize the process engineers use to develop
systems and solutions to address a local hazard.
Review teacher guide, slides, and teacher references or keys (if applicable).
Make copies of handouts and ensure sufficient copies of student references, readings, and procedures are available.
Make sure the audio can play for 6.5 - Lesson 7 Audio Alerts for Tsunami Warning. (See the Online Resources Guide
for a link to this item. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources)
Between day 1 and day 2, modify slide H to reflect student ideas that are generated on Community Stakeholders.
Several communication examples are provided for students to analyze, including multiple cell phone apps, flyers,
infographics, and an audio Public Service Announcement at 6.5 - Lesson 7 Audio Public Service Announcement (See
the Online Resources Guide for a link to this item. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources) Consider
supplementing these options with any local resources for your community.
Be sure you have materials ready to add the following words to the Word Wall: stakeholder and system. Do not post
these word(s) on the wall until after your class has developed a shared understanding of their meaning.
Materials: science notebook, 6.5 - Lesson 7 Audio Alerts for Tsunami Warning (See the Online Resources Guide for a *Attending to Equity
link to this item. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources) Supporting Empathy and
Emotions: Listening to sirens and
Additional Guidance alarming alerts can trigger a stress
response in students. They are
Supporting emotions and empathy: This lesson integrates the alarm system sounds and the experiences and purposely designed that way to
feelings tsunami survivors had as they received the warning signals of an approaching tsunami. The tales include alert people to danger. However,
grief at the loss of homes and people and feelings of being scared. Students might experience similar emotions as it is important for students to
they learn about how people responded in the tsunami event and why education and communication solutions are experience the sounds they can
key parts of a system designed to protect communities. Be prepared for students to struggle with fright or grief after expect to hear in a dangerous
hearing or reading about natural hazard damage. event, so that they can respond
Prepare students for what they will hear.* Display slide A. This lesson begins with an audio clip of Japan tsunami appropriately when they hear
warning signals, including alerts from cell phones, TVs, loudspeaker announcers, and sirens. Say, We are about to listen the sound. If students don’t have
to the signals that people receive after a tsunami is detected. As we listen, think about what the community residents might experience hearing warning
be feeling, seeing, or hearing during the moments before a tsunami arrives. We will listen one time through without writing— signals, they could become scared
just close your eyes and listen. The second time through, we will make notes about what we Notice and Wonder. Consider as or panicked during the event. The
you listen: Who are the people hearing this warning? What will they do next? Kamaishi case study on day 2 is a
good example of how practicing
Play the audio clip at 6.5 - Lesson 7 Audio Alerts for Tsunami Warning. (See the Online Resources Guide for a link to
listening to and responding to
this item. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources) Ask students to close their eyes, put their heads down,
warning signals can help students
and just listen to the alarm signals being sent to residents. The clip is 1:30 long. Once it has been played, ask students
be prepared in the event a natural
to take out their notebooks, and as the clip is played a second time, ask students to record what they Notice and
hazard event occurs.
Wonder about in their science notebooks.
Support for Universal Design
After the students have listened twice through the clip, say, Last class, we found out that warnings are sent after a
for Learning: Consider how some
tsunami that will reach land is detected. We just heard some of those warnings. What did you Notice and Wonder as you
students may react to loud or
listened to the audio clip?
alarming noises. If needed, the clip
Suggested prompt Sample student responses has lower tones starting at 1:08
through the end of the clip, where
What did you notice about the sounds we heard? The sounds were a little scary. there is an announcer with very low
They had a lot of different sounds. sirens heard in the background.
This section of the audio might
I couldn’t understand what the person was saying.
be more appropriate to play for
It sounds like some were on cell phones but others were loudspeakers. students who are sensitive to loud
or alarming noises.
had to react to the warning signals. We have some stories from some of those people about tsunameter—it turns out that satellite signals do not
travel well through water. Fortunately, sound travels very
quickly through water. So, sound waves, or sonar, are
used to send and receive signals from the tsunameter.
Information
what they did and how they felt as it was happening. how does a tsunameter work?
A tsunameter is anchored to the ocean floor. It has Use this text as an opportunity to
several devices attached to it that float upward. As
Divide students into groups. Each group will read at least three accounts using Voices
a wave moves across the ocean’s surface, the water
underneath the wave gets pushed down deeper
into the ocean. If a large wave occurs, more water
support students in developing
the element of: Integrate qualitative
is pushed down, which also pushes down on the
from Japan Tsunami Survivors. If time allows, they can read more. Ensure that groups
floating devices attached to the tsunameter. The
tsunameter records the height and movement of
these floating devices every 15 minutes when it is in
choose different accounts to read about so that all stories are read by one or more
the tsunameter is switched to “active” mode, it takes
measurements every minute.
Stop to Wonder: Why do you think the tsunameter is NoAA
pairs of students in the classroom. As students read, ask them to pay close attention to
sometimes in sleep mode and not always in active mode?
When a tsunami occurs, a huge wave moves across the ocean’s surface, pushing large amounts
of water down on the devices attached to the tsunameter. once the devices sink to a certain
or technical information in written
the following:
depth, the tsunameter sends a signal back up to the surface buoy telling it that a tsunami was
just detected on the ocean surface.
•
US National oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NoAA). Retrieved from: https://
www.noaa.gov/explainers/ustsunami- warning-system
Bureau of Meteorology, Australia. Retrieved from: http://www.bom.gov.au/tsunami/
on text, media, and visual displays
about/detection_buoys.shtml
• What else would you like to know about their experience?* 100 NATURAL HAZARDS
to better understand the criteria
Let students read quietly for 3–5 minutes and then talk about these questions with
CKSci_G6U5_SPG.indb 100 25/10/22 11:56 AM
and constraints for effective
their partner and be ready to share what they learned with the class. communication systems. At this
point, students are drawing on
qualitative information from
survivor stories (written text) about
how they responded.
Materials: Voices from Japan Tsunami Survivors, Community Stakeholders, chart paper, markers *Attending to Equity
Identify characteristics of community members from the stories. Continue to display slide B. Ask partners to Supporting Emergent
share stories from Voices from Japan Tsunami Survivors with the class. Use the questions on the slides to help focus Multilingual Students: Teachers
students’ sharing with the whole class. can support all students,
particularly emerging multilingual
Suggested prompts Sample student responses students, in forming a deeper
understanding of newly “earned”
Who is this person? a grandmother
vocabulary by representing the
a student new term in multiple ways. For
a teacher example, students can (1) write the
term, (2) draw a representation of
a business owner
the term, (3) use their own words
What was their experience like? She saw water coming and it just kept coming. to write an explanation for what
the term means, or (4) use the new
The student knew that a tsunami was coming and planned to go to
term in a sentence.
the hills as soon as the shaking stopped.
She couldn’t understand the announcements. The representation for
stakeholders (people who have an
He knew they needed to evacuate right away. interest or concern or investment
What else would you like to know about their I’m wondering if the grandma was safe where she was on the hill. in something) should mostly
experience? illustrate the people who will be
I’m wondering how the students knew what to do. impacted by the design solution
I’m wondering if the teacher was able to figure out what the (in this case, a warning system that
announcement meant. communicates to people how and
I’m wondering if the business owner and his employees made it to when to respond).
safety.
Alternate Activity
Consider creating a table or graphic organizer to track student ideas to these questions to compare similarities and
differences in how people might receive and respond to warning signals.
Define stakeholders. Say, It sounds like most of these people either knew what was happening, or someone warned them.
However, there were some people that didn’t quite know what was happening. They all survived the tsunami in Japan, but
they had different experiences based on who they are and what they knew about tsunamis.
Take a moment with students to define “stakeholders” for students. First, ask students, As we work together to figure out
ways to protect and warn communities about tsunamis, how might we use these first-hand accounts to evaluate different
may not be strong enough to climb onto objects). Young Student ✔ yes ❍ no Help knowing where to go Teachers, older
and get there safely students
• People who don’t have technology (they may not see or hear
the signal). Salesperson ❍ yes ✔ no
• People who are traveling and do not know the area and/or local
language (they won’t know where to go or might not be able to interpret the language).
Transition students to now consider what a communication system needs to do to protect the most people.
Say, Now that we know who needs to know a tsunami is coming, let’s consider what communication solutions we need to
protect as many people as possible.
Define criteria and constraints for the communication system. Say, OK, now that we have an idea of what the
problem is and the goals of the system, let’s figure out what the system has to do to work and what potential limitations or
Assessment Opportunity
Building towards: 7.A Integrate written text with multimedia displays of tsunami warning and preparedness systems
to clarify additional ways communities at-risk of tsunami can mitigate potential future effects.
What to look for/listen for: Look for clearly identified stakeholders with particular needs for emergency
communication, and then look for corresponding criteria and constraints that address those needs but might limit
Materials: None
Assign Home Learning. Display slide G. Say, As you experience communication outside the classroom between now and
the next class, pay attention to all the ways you send and receive communication. Think about whether there are any ideas
from your experience that we should consider. Jot these down and bring these ideas with you to class next time.
End of day 1
Materials: Evaluation Matrix, Tsunami Communication Examples, 6.5 - Lesson 7 Audio Public Service Announcement *Supporting Students in
(See the Online Resources Guide for a link to this item. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources), chart Engaging in Argument from
paper, markers Evidence
Evaluate different communication options using criteria and constraints. Display slide I. Divide As groups engage in this
the class into 10 groups of students (2–3 per group). There are multiple communication options that discussion, center their focus
will be evaluated using a jigsaw method with at least two groups evaluating each option. Students can on how their evidence can be
use Tsunami Communication Examples in the student edition or supplement with additional or alternate useful for evaluating claims and
examples as needed. One example in another language is included in the selection, and an audio Public persuading others about the
Service Announcement (PSA) is also available at 6.5 - Lesson 7 Audio Public Service Announcement (See the Online validity of their ideas. When
Resources Guide for a link to this item. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources) A variety of examples students are engaged in the work
allows students to evaluate the affordances and constraints of different modes of communication. of argumentation, they should
explicitly build from evidence,
Alternate Activity past experiences, and/or shared
observations to support their
Choose groupings that fit your class size and context. However, having more than one group evaluate each conclusions.
communication option will provide the opportunity for students to build consensus on their ratings of each option.
If only one group reviews an option, offer additional support to help build consensus within the group. For example,
encourage students to use the Communicating in Scientific Ways chart and evidence from the images to support their
ratings of each option against the criteria and constraints.
Groups will work separately at first to review the resource and rate it against the criteria. Groups will also list possible
community constraints that might limit how the solutions could work for the community, or students might even list
constraints of the technology itself. Give students 5 minutes to do this initial pass. They will rate only the options on
their assigned row.
Infographic ●●●●● ●●●●● ●●●●● Only seen where posted, small text
Pamphlet ●●●●● ●●● ●●●●● Really small text, only in one format
Cell Phone App 1 ●●● ●●● ●●●●● Limited cell phone access, some people
might have difficulty with app
Cell Phone App 2 ●●● ●●●●● ●●●●● Limited cell phone access
Display slide J with new instructions. The two groups assigned to the same communication options will need to meet
together and come to consensus on how they rated the option and what constraints the communication option might have.*
Share ratings across groups. Once groups have shared agreement on their assigned communication option,
reconvene the class to share the results. Title a chart as “Communication Options” (or project a blank Evaluation Matrix
onto a whiteboard). Ask the groups to share their ratings and record their thinking for the class.
Ask students if they notice any patterns in the ratings, and whether they think one option is better than the others. For
example, ask, Does one of these options seem to do everything really well? Why or why not?
Assessment Opportunity
Building towards: 7.B Evaluate communication options using a systematic process and agreed-upon criteria and
constraints to determine how well the design (structure) serves to communicate to stakeholders (function).
What to look for/listen for: Listen for agreement within the jigsaw groups about what their assigned communication
option does well and what are its limitations. Then, across all groups, as a whole class, listen for ideas about how some
communication options meet some criteria very well, while others meet other criteria well. The purpose of this work is to
better understand that by combining multiple forms of communication, systems can address multiple stakeholder needs.
What to do: If students struggle to come to an agreement within the group, ask students, Does that fit the criteria we
laid out? How do you know? Or, Does it fit some criteria well, but not others? When combining work across the groups,
encourage students to consider patterns in what they are noticing, such as, Which of these options does ____ well?
Which of these options does not do ______ well?
Discuss the benefits of having multiple options available. Come back together as a whole class and pose this
question using slide K: Why would it be important to have multiple modes of communication in the event of a hazard?
Would you know what to do when you hear a warning signal?
Materials: science notebook, Tsunami Chain of Events, large sticky notes, markers
Update Tsunami Chain of Events. Display slide M and prompt students to add new ideas to the Tsunami Chain of
Events. Ask students, What new ideas could we add that engineers consider as part of communicating before and during
tsunamis? Ideas can include the following:
• Communicating before a hazard by letting people know they are at risk and how they should respond.
• Communicating during a hazard to warn people quickly and tell them how to respond or act in the moment.
• Providing different means of communication to alert as many people as possible.
Summarize student ideas and add them to the Tsunami Chain of Events by adding a large sticky note (or several) about
communicating and educating people to prepare and respond. Importantly, connect these ideas to the sections of the
chart that were highlighted in Lesson 4. These “purple” ideas were added to forecast who is at risk in Lesson 4. Now we
are connecting to those ideas by communicating with those communities at risk.
1. Plan ahead.
Determine your pacing to introduce the reading selections, check in with students on their progress, and discuss the
reading content and writing exercise. If you are performing Science Literacy as a structured, weekly routine, you might
implement a schedule like this:
• Monday: Designate a ten-minute period at the beginning of the week to introduce students to the assignment.
• Wednesday: Plan to touch base briefly with students in the middle of the week to answer questions about the
reading, to clarify expectations about the writing exercise, and to help students stay on track.
• Friday: Set aside time at the end of the week to facilitate a discussion about the reading and the writing exercise.
You’ll proceed with the in-class lesson investigations during this week.
• Let students know they will read independently and then complete a short writing assignment. The reading
selection relates to topics they are presently exploring in their Natural Hazards unit science investigations.
• The reading and writing will be completed outside of class (unless you have available class time to allocate).
• Preview the reading. Share a short summary of what students can expect.
First, you will read how the severity of a natural hazard event changes with the scale of the event. In the first example,
you’ll learn how the density of a population affects the spreading of contagious diseases. In a second example, you’ll
learn how an earthquake magnitude scale changes from one level to the next.
Touch base midweek with students to make sure they are on track while working independently. You may choose to
administer a midweek minute-quiz to give students a concrete reason not to postpone completing the reading until
the last minute. Ask questions such as these, and have students jot answers on a half sheet of paper:
Ask a few brief discussion questions related to the reading that will help students tie the text content to students’
classroom investigations.
• Refer students to the Exercise Page 3. Provide more specific guidance about expectations for students’ deliverables Exercise Page
due at the end of the week.
The writing expectation is to complete an outline that summarizes main ideas from all the readings in Collection 3.
When you work on the outline is up to you. You could begin it as you preview the selections, as you read for
understanding, or afterward to review them. EP 3
When you copy the outline, leave a couple of lines of space for each main idea you will fill in.
Make sure the main ideas are in the same order the author presented them.
Don’t forget to use the same style and write complete sentences.
Spend a couple of minutes reading your completed outline to make sure it is in your own words.
• Answer any questions students may have relative to the reading content or the exercise expectations.
Facilitate class discussion about the reading collection and writing exercise. Several NGSS Crosscutting Concepts are
Student Reader
prominent themes in this collection. In the first reading, Scale, Proportion, and Quantity inform the discussion of
density-dependence and earthquake magnitude. The second reading encourages students to think about Systems
and System Models. The third focuses on Cause and Effect, and the fourth develops Patterns by showing students how
graphs can be interpreted to find patterns in data. Collection 3
Pages 24–31
Suggested prompts Sample student responses
SUPPORT—If you are using the
What is the general purpose of the first selection, It explains that some natural hazards, such as contagious recommended word envelope
“Contrasting Natural Hazards”? diseases, are made worse where there are lots of people convention, check the envelope
close together and that some earthquake hazards are to see if it contains any words,
worse because they release more energy. phrases, or sentences that students
What do the black boxes on John Snow’s map represent? places where people who were sick with cholera lived need help understanding. Read
key sentences aloud, and provide
Take a look at the “Dig into Data” box. About how many of the around 1,670 concise explanation.
more than a million earthquakes in a year are of a magnitude
that can cause minor to catastrophic property damage?
SUPPORT—The earthquake
What is the general purpose of the second selection, It describes things people can do to reduce damage and magnitude scale is a logarithmic
“Natural Hazard Survival 101”? injuries from earthquakes, tsunamis, wildfires, and floods. scale, chosen to make it easier to
Which of the four precautions may be the most difficult for probably the first one, to move away from hazard zones, compare a wide range in severity
families to follow? Why? because people may not be able to leave their jobs and of earthquakes. However, it is not
family members who live nearby easy to understand because it
involves thinking about exponents.
Look at the photo of the Tsunami Hazard Zone marker. You It can remind the people who live in that neighborhood to Students can get a feel for what
can see homes all around. So, how would such a post be be prepared for the next tsunami so they can escape being the numbers in the magnitude
helpful? hurt. scale represent by playing with
What advice would you give your family members about They should stick to following government agencies, the USGS’s online “How Much
using social media sites to get accurate alerts about natural such as the National Weather Service, NOAA, and the US. Bigger. . . ?” calculator. Encourage
hazards? Geological Survey. These will have the most up-to-date and them to begin by entering
accurate information. Also, they should avoid social media sequential numbers (e.g., 4 and 5)
posts that are from individuals or organizations they have into the calculator and noticing the
never heard of. difference in the magnitude (the
degree of motion or amplitude of
What is the general purpose of the third article, “Disaster It describes the timeline of effects caused by the March 11, the waves) versus the difference
Domino Effect”? 2011, tsunami in Japan. in energy release of those two
earthquakes.
Use the rubric provided on the Exercise Page to supply feedback to each student.
Previous Lesson We listened to tsunami warning signals and read accounts of tsunami survivors from Japan and what they did when an earthquake
and tsunami occurred. We identified community stakeholders, developed criteria and constraints for tsunami communication
solutions, and evaluated different ways tsunami preparation and response are communicated. We read a case study about a school
in Kamaishi that included education as part of their plan. From this we learned that there are many ways to communicate with
community stakeholders before and during a tsunami event.
This Lesson We discuss the importance of having reliable communication systems during a hazard and
Investigation then gather information using digital tools and mathematics concepts to compare different
communication systems to one another over time. We develop a shared understanding that
1 day communication technologies use different types of signals to send and receive messages. Some
signals and technologies are more reliable means of communication. However, a combination of
different ways of communicating during a hazard is better than using only one technology alone.
Next Lesson We will develop a system model to represent what we’ve learned about detecting, warning people, and reducing damage from
tsunamis. We will analyze the importance and purpose of the subsystems and generalize the process engineers use to develop
systems and solutions to address a local hazard.
Review teacher guide, slides, and teacher references or keys (if applicable).
Make copies of handouts and ensure sufficient copies of student references, readings, and procedures are available.
If you have access to computers or tablets for students in groups of 2-3, practice opening the StoryMap, Sending Warning
Signals. (See the Online Resources Guide for a link to this item. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources)
Review the StoryMaps so that you know how to help students navigate them and the embedded videos, texts, and maps.
LESSON 8 NATURAL HAZARDS | 180
Depending on how much class time you have, consider breaking this reading up into parts so students only read a
section of it and then share information across groups.
If you do not have access to computers or tablets, consider the following options or a combination of them:
1. Have students use their personal devices to view their assigned StoryMap.
2. Use the print-based alternative: Sending Warning Signals. A color copy of this reading is also located in the Reading
section of the Student Edition and can be printed as handouts for students to annotate and attach to their science
notebooks. If using the print-based versions, students can watch videos here:
a. The Telegraph
b. Bell Telephone Operators
c. Tornado Sirens
d. Comparing Analog and Digital Signals
(See the Online Resources Guide for links to these items. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources)
1. Navigation 5 min
In Lesson 7, students generated a list of stakeholders on Part 1 of Community Stakeholders. If students cannot
remember specific stakeholders, ask students to reference this handout. Alternatively, a list of common stakeholders
can be made before this lesson begins based on the stakeholders students have identified on Community Stakeholders
and placed by the analog and digital chart at this time.
Building towards: 8.A.2 Use digital tools and/or mathematical concepts to integrate and synthesize information to
compare the reliability of emergency communication systems.
What to look/listen for:
• Ideas of how technologies have changed over time, but some technologies are still used today to alert people in a
hazard.
• Ideas about how technologies use different systems for communication.
Wired v. Wireless
Broadcast to each individual household v. broadcast across an entire area
• Ideas for why some signals (i.e. digital) are more reliable than others.
• Ideas for what causes some communication technologies to be limited in their ability to warn people.
What to do: If students are struggling comparing communication systems, ask students about very specific
communication systems, such as morse code versus push notifications. Ask students about how they are similar or
different, and their benefits and drawbacks for each stakeholder group. If students are struggling with comparing
analog and digital signals, have students focus on the types of technologies that use each type of signal. Ask
students to compare their reliability and utility in a natural hazard. If students are struggling with what system may
be more reliable for certain stakeholder groups versus others, ask students how that stakeholder group generally
receives their information, and what type of information that stakeholder group would need. Consider if that form of
communication is analog or digital, and then ask students the pros and cons of it being in that form. Ask students to
then determine how reliable that would be in a hazard, and if that is the only method of communication needed for
that stakeholder group. If students are struggling with identifying digital as a more reliable method of communication,
focus students back on the storymap. Ask students to consider those that live in remote locations or those that are not
in a place to hear sirens or others and determine which method is more likely to reach that stakeholder group with a
clean signal.
Turn and talk about communication types (optional). Say, It sounds like there are a variety of warnings that would
work during a hazard, both analog and digital. Project slide E. Ask students to turn and talk to a partner about the
question on the slide. If your students have already arrived at the conclusions below, proceed on to the navigation into
the next lesson.
• What type(s) of signals should we use during a natural hazard?
• Should we use only one method, analog or digital?
• Why or why not?
Allow students to respond. Guide students to determine that a digital signal is an option that meets the needs of
many stakeholders, but multiple methods of communication are a good idea during a natural hazard. Students should
suggest that we need a variety of communication methods, both analog and digital, to alert people during a natural
hazard such as a tsunami. Students should also conclude that while we have the ability to use both analog and digital
signals, digital signals tend to be the most reliable and reach the most people in a short period of time.
Previous Lesson We discussed the importance of having reliable communication systems during a hazard and then gathered information using
digital tools and mathematics concepts to compare different communication systems to one another over time. We developed a
shared understanding that communication technologies use different types of signals to send and receive messages. Some signals
and technologies are more reliable means of communication. However, a combination of different ways of communicating during a
hazard is better than using only one technology alone.
This Lesson We revisit past lessons to categorize and organize what we have learned about the systems
Putting Pieces Together and subsystems involved in detecting, warning people, and reducing damage from tsunamis.
We work together in a Scientists Circle to develop a systems model that identifies the
1 day relationships within and between subsystems and understand how they work together to
meet the goals of a community. We generalize the process that engineers engage in to solve
problems and use what we have learned to develop a plan to address a local natural hazard.
Next Lesson We will investigate the general patterns of risk of other natural hazards in the United States and determine our local level of risk
for each hazard. We will choose a natural hazard, obtain and evaluate information from a variety of sources, and develop a
plan and final communication product. We will evaluate our final plans and products using constraints and criteria for effective
communication with our stakeholder groups.
Review teacher guide, slides, and teacher references or keys (if applicable).
Make copies of handouts and ensure sufficient copies of student references, readings, and procedures are available.
Create a three-column chart titled, “Ways to Protect People and Property”
• Detect and Forecast
• Warn and Communicate
• Reduce Damage
Decide which option you will use to build a System Model to represent the larger system for tsunami protection.
• Option 1: Add the System Model directly to the Tsunami Chain of Events. Add sticky notes and arrows as needed to
map the different subsystems (design solutions and technologies) onto different aspects of the Tsunami Chain of
Events.
• Option 2: Build a System Model representation on a separate chart next to the Tsunami Chain of Events. Continue
to facilitate a conversation about which point in the Chain of Events each design solution and technology is present
to protect communities.
Option 1 is represented on the left below; There are pictorial and conceptual examples for Option 2 in the center and
on the right.
Additional Guidance
You can streamline the headings to “Detect,” “Warn People,” and “Reduce Damage” if that is easier for students to
align with Lesson 1, but be sure that predicting/forecasting where and when these events happen and preparing and
communicating risk and how to respond are parts of these bigger categories.
Brainstorm design solutions and technologies. Ask students to work in partners or small groups to brainstorm
as many different design solutions and/or technologies that they encountered across the unit that would be part
of one of these categories. Do one example together first. Say, We looked at the use of seawalls in Lesson 5. Which
of these categories does a seawall fit? (Reducing damage.) Give students a few minutes to brainstorm where they
would fit different solutions.
Generate a public list of system components. Project slide B. Ask students to share out what parts they identified
from our past lessons. Chart their ideas using the same columns as slide A. As students share, ask which category they
placed each part of the system into and why. Possible ideas are as follows:
Additional Guidance
If possible, leverage students’ prior experience with systems and subsystems from the previous units: Unit 6.1: Why do
we sometimes see different things when looking at the same object? (One-way Mirror Unit), Unit 6.2: How can containers
keep stuff from warming up or cooling down? (Cup Design Unit), and Unit 6.3: Why does a lot of hail, rain, or snow fall at
some times and not others? (Storms Unit).
Students should develop a list of the components of the system in the previous chart. If students are missing
components on the class chart, use the following prompts to help guide students to include more components (not all
of these need to be listed, but try to elicit as many as you can):
Detect and Forecast
• Think back to Lesson 6. How do we know a tsunami is coming? What system is already in place to detect tsunamis?
• What are the parts of the DART II system that we read about?
• How did we know where and when these things might happen? What data did we use for detection or to forecast
where and when it might happen?
Warn and Communicate
• In our last lesson, we learned how people felt and responded during a tsunami. What warned them that a tsunami
was coming?
• What do we need to do ahead of time to make sure we are safe during the event?
• When people are alerted of a tsunami, what should they do?
Materials: science notebook, Tsunami Chain of Events, Ways to Protect People and Property chart, markers, large *Supporting Students in
sticky notes Developing and Using Systems
Gather in a Scientists Circle to build a Systems Model. Gather around the Tsunami Chain of Events and the Ways and System Models
to Protect People and Property chart. Project slide C.* Set the purpose of building a Systems Model to identify the Across Lessons 5–7, students
different components of the engineering subsystems and, importantly, with how they are connected and function have been figuring out how
together to detect, warn, and reduce damage as part of the Tsunami Chain of Events. Say, We’ve been learning about different subsystems function
all these subsystems, and we are ready to connect them all together to better understand how we can protect people and independently. This is the moment
property when tsunamis happen. in the unit where students will
The Tsunami Chain of Events currently has science ideas about where tsunamis happen, why there, how they form, build a larger, more complex
and how they move. It also has different approaches that engineers can take to mitigate the effects of tsunamis. At this system that connects the functions
point, students will add the different components of the subsystems to the chain of events so that they can then focus of the subsystems to show how
on interactions between the subsystems. they interact within one another
to protect communities at certain
points in the Tsunami Chain of
Events.
Later in this lesson, the systems
analysis helps students determine
the connectivity between
subsystems to support the goals
of a larger system. By analyzing
the subsystems and their larger
*Supporting Students in
Engaging in Developing and
Using Models
Students gain experience with
this practice through multiple
opportunities to construct a model
of a system and its interactions,
including first categorizing the
parts of the subsystems and then
working together as a class to
develop a consensus system model
Map subsystems onto a larger System Model.* Point to the Ways to Protect People and Property chart. Say, Now of the whole system.
that we have all of the basic components of our system, let’s see if we can arrange them into a larger system representation to
show how they are connected. We will use the Tsunami Chain of Events to guide our work so that we can see how this system
works at different points during a tsunami. We will use a different color to represent the subsystems.*
Start with Detection and Forecasting subsystems. Using the “Detect and Forecast” column on the “Ways to Protect
People and Properties” chart, map the different design solutions and technologies onto the Tsunami Chain of Events.
Remind students that tsunamis don’t happen every day, and for the system to be used, it has to start with an event.
Start the process by asking students what the first event is that has to occur for a tsunami to form. Students should say
that an earthquake has to occur and reference the starting point on the Tsunami Chain of Events. Ask students which
subsystems (e.g., design solutions) would be activated or used when that occurs. Add these design solutions on sticky
notes to the Tsunami Chain of Events.
Say, OK, so we’ve mapped different design solutions that are important at this point of a tsunami. What happens next? Which
design solutions come into play in the next part of a tsunami?
Repeat these steps for the different subsystems in the “Warn and Communicate” and “Reduce Damage” columns of the
chart. As the class does this work, encourage students to communicate with one another about what each sticky note
says and where to place it on the Tsunami Chain of Events.
If mapped to the Tsunami Chain of Events, it will look similar to this, with the new yellow sticky notes presenting design
solutions that work at different points in the chain:
Make connections between all the subsystems working together.* Have a Consensus Building Discussion to
come to an agreement about how the larger system works together to protect communities. Say, We’ve got all these
subsystems that work at different points when a tsunami happens. Let’s talk through how they are connected together.
Key Ideas
Purpose of the discussion: To come to an agreement that there are many different subsystems (e.g., design solutions
and technologies) that work together at different points during a tsunami event.
Look for/listen for the following:
• Ideas about how subsystems connect to one another along the Tsunami Chain of Events, such as the following:
Using data, we know where tsunamis might happen, so we put sensors in those places.
Those sensors pick up movement of the ocean floor or water and send satellite signals.
Those signals alert scientists who may issue tsunami warnings.
Tsunami warnings alert community members to respond.
Assessment Opportunity
Building towards: 8.A Construct a system model to represent the interactions of subsystems designed to detect,
warn communities, and reduce damage from a tsunami hazard.
What to look for/listen for: Connections should be determined between various parts of the subsystem. Students
should be able to articulate: (1) systems are comprised of subsystems that work together as a system, (2) parts of
the subsystem cannot fully protect a community on their own, and some rely on feedback from other parts of the
system, and (3) while the system works to meet the needs of the individual community, the system components and
interactions may have to be altered when applied to other communities or situations.
Alternate Activity
There are many options for how to represent how engineering design was accomplished in this unit. Students might
want to represent it linearly or in another format. All representations are welcome; the more important idea is that
students understand different aspects of the design process and that moving back and forth between those aspects is
a natural way engineering design works.
Assessment Opportunity
Self-assessments are valuable tools to gauge student understanding. Students rely on a feedback loop involving
the student and teacher for personal academic growth. Use this assessment to determine any perceived areas of
challenges and successes from a student’s perspective, and provide timely feedback for the students (either on the
front or back of this paper) regarding their perceptions and reality. Remember to give some positive feedback for every
critique to help build the student’s self-efficacy in the engineering process.
Alternate Activity
This self-assessment can be done digitally using an online survey tool. A Google form example is included with the
online unit materials. Make a copy and customize this for your classroom.
LESSON 9 NATURAL HAZARDS | 202
5. Look back at related phenomena. 5 min
Additional Guidance
If students are having trouble coming up with ways they can help prepare for a natural hazard, remind students that
we have read about students who helped their community of Kamaishi during the 2011 tsunami. Ask students the
following:
• What is something that others your age did that we learned about to help before and during the natural hazard?
Say, Next class maybe we can use all the ideas we have figured out to prepare our own communities or other communities for
hazards that might affect them.
This Lesson In this lesson, we investigate the general patterns of risk of other natural hazards in
the United States. We determine our local level of risk for each hazard. We then choose
Putting Pieces Together
a natural hazard, gather information, and plan for communication to an identified
2 days stakeholder community at risk for the hazard. We obtain and evaluate information from
a variety of sources, including agencies and organizations that focus on hazards and
emergencies, and then develop a plan and final communication product. We evaluate
our final plans and products using constraints and criteria for effective communication
with our stakeholder groups.
3 10 min BUILD CONSENSUS ABOUT GENERAL PATTERNS OF C Assessing Hazard Risk, Assessing Risk chart, markers
RISK VERSUS LOCAL RISK FOR NATURAL HAZARDS
Build consensus about general patterns of natural hazard
occurrence versus local risk for natural hazards.
4 10 min EXPLAIN RISK D Assessing Hazard Risk
Choose a hazard and use data to explain local risk of the
natural hazard occurrence.
5 5 min COMPLETE EXIT TICKET E Assessing Hazard Risk, chart paper, markers
Brainstorm ideas for additional information and data
needed to investigate other natural hazards further.
End of day 1
6 5 min REVISIT IDEAS FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING F-G
INFORMATION
Revisit student ideas generated at the end of day 1.
Review teacher guide, slides, and teacher references or keys (if applicable).
Make copies of handouts and ensure sufficient copies of student references, readings, and
procedures are available.
Test the digital maps. (See the Online Resources Guide for a link to this item. www.coreknowledge.org/
cksci-online-resources) or make available the color printed maps in the student reference section of the
student edition.
Create an Assessing Risk chart listing all natural hazards with columns for a general pattern, local risk, and
wonderings.
Use Hazard Communication Project Choice and Platform Information to learn about digital tool options
and modify the student handout, Project Options to account for any acceptable use policy or classroom
limitations.
Gather any materials that students will need (chart paper, markers, pencils, etc.) and ensure the class has
computer access for the duration of this lesson if they pursue a digital choice.
Materials: Assessing Hazard Risk, Natural Hazard Risk Maps interactive (See the Online Resources Guide for a link to *Supporting Students in
this item. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources), computer, projector Engaging in Using Mathematics
Elicit ideas about data we need. Display slide B. Ask students, Think back. What data did we use to determine which and Computational Thinking
places in the world were most at risk for tsunamis? Students should mention the maps and graphs used in Lesson 2. Ask, Orient students to the data
How could we use a similar type of data to assess our risk for other natural hazards? Student ideas may include: provided within the digital tool
• Analyzing data on maps to see where hazards happen. and the expectations for analyzing
the large data set. Model one
• Analyzing data on graphs or in other text to see how often they happen, how severe they can get, or if they happen hazard together as a class to help
at certain times of year. students understand how they can
Distribute Part 1 of Assessing Hazard Risk. Display or provide copies of Hazard Risk Maps. (See the Online Resources use the large data set to identify
Guide for a link to this item. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources) Orient students to the maps using a general regional patterns of risk
few prompts: as well as their local level of risk. If
• What is the data we are looking at? How do you know? students have worked with many
large data sets, less orientation and
• What does the legend say about the maps?
scaffolding may be necessary.
• What is our handout asking us to do with this data?*
Display slide C. Once students are oriented to the maps and the handout, have students work in groups for *Attending to Equity
approximately 15–20 minutes to assess general patterns of occurrence in the listed natural hazards.* They should also Supporting Universal Design
assess their local level of risk of each hazard and note any questions or curiosities about the hazard. Groups should for Learning: Work through one
complete Question 1 together. They will complete Questions 2 & 3 later in the lesson. hazard as a whole class to model
collaboration and expectations for
group work to enhance student
engagement with the data. Ask
students prompts, such as: What are
we looking for in the data? How might
we capture our ideas as a group?
How can we ensure everyone can
participate in working with this data?
Materials: Assessing Hazard Risk, Assessing Risk chart, markers *Supporting Students in
Build consensus about patterns of risk.* Continue to display slide C. Once students have completed Question 1 on Developing and Using Patterns
the handout, pause to build consensus across their findings as a class. Use the premade Assessing Risk chart to record Use this opportunity to emphasize
the patterns of regional and local risk for each natural hazard. Ask students: how maps can be used to see
general overall patterns of risk for a
• How would you describe the general pattern of risk for _____ hazard? Do others agree? Did you notice anything natural hazard and also identify the
different? level of risk for a local community.
• What about our local risk? What level is it? (Very High, High, Moderate, Low, Little to None) This allows students to see that
• What wonderings do you have about this hazard? Have you had prior experiences with this hazard? levels of risk for different hazards
vary for communities across the US.
Work through each hazard, and record areas of agreement, disagreement, or questions.
Additional Guidance
If time allows, make one chart with science-related ideas, such as what causes the hazard, how often they happen, how
intense or big it can get, etc. Then make a second chart with engineering-related ideas, such as what communities
can do to protect themselves from a hazard (e.g., structures, technologies, communication plans, education). If time is
short, have students jot down a few ideas onto an index card or scrap paper and turn it in before they leave.
Use this generation of ideas to gather supplemental materials and resources to help students investigate other
hazards. Collect Assessing Hazard Risk from students to gather their ideas for which hazards they are interested in
investigating, what data or information they might need, and plan for the next few days of instruction.
Additional Guidance
After class, review the chart to look for what data students might need for each identified hazard. Between days 1 and
2, look over the cards for each hazard and determine if students will need any supplemental materials to enhance their
investigations. Websites, such as the NOAA and USGS sites, are accessible and include student-friendly language and
resources, if needed, for different hazards.
End of day 1
Materials: None
Revisit chart from day 1. Display slide F. Refer students back to the chart of science and engineering ideas completed
on day 1. Ask students to look over the list and add any additional ideas or data they might need to the chart. As
students wrap up adding to the chart, share the summary of the main hazards students would like to know more
about and the data or information that they would need to learn more about these hazards.
Turn and Talk about the use of the hazards information. Display slide G. Say, OK. We have now identified hazards
of interest. We also know what data we would like to have to learn more about them. But what are we going to do with this
information?
Allow students a moment to turn and talk to a partner about the prompt on the slide.
• What should we do with this information about our hazards once it is collected?
• What do scientists and engineers do with their hazards information?
Students should identify a variety of things we can do with the information, including presenting to someone about
that hazard. When discussing what scientists and engineers do with the hazards information, remind students that in
Lesson 9 we had spent some time considering what scientists and engineers did as part of the overall system and that
we might find some ideas by looking back at our class chart.
Additional Guidance
For this discussion, consider using charts from previous lessons to help draw out ideas from students. If students are
uncertain if each group would need different information or different methods of communication, compare two
different stakeholder groups from the Community Stakeholders chart to help spur the discussion about stakeholder
needs. For example, you might say, Let’s compare the elderly and children. How might they get information that they listen
to and trust? Are those methods of communication similar or different? Would they need to know the same information?
Introduce Determining Stakeholder Needs. Project slide J. Say, It sounds like we have to consider how we communicate
with our stakeholders and what their needs are. Distribute Determining Stakeholder Needs. Direct students to look at the
top of the chart as a class. Emphasize that the handout is intended to help determine what needs to be considered
Materials: Determining Stakeholder Needs, Hazard Communication Planning, Project Options, Natural Hazards Around the World *Supporting Students in
Say, Yesterday we analyzed what needs our stakeholders had for a communication plan and what type of plan to develop for Engaging in Obtaining,
them. But, we also have a lot of information that we need to communicate. We know that our communication method will Evaluating, and Communicating
depend on the stakeholders, and what we are communicating will depend on the hazard we have each chosen. Let’s take a Information
few minutes to look at another tool that can help us determine what might be important to share with our stakeholders. At this point in this final lesson,
Explain part 1 of Hazard Communication Planning. Display slide K. Distribute Hazard Communication Planning to students will focus on critically
students. Explain to students that this handout will guide them through collecting information about their hazards obtaining important information
based upon the areas we identified in our systems model from Lesson 9. from a text adapted for classroom
use, alongside some additional
Explain part 2 of Hazard Communication Planning. Display slide L. Show students part 2 of the handout. In part resources. They will need to
2, students will consider how to present the information that is relevant to stakeholders in their communication plan. integrate that information and
Remind students that there are suggestions for what to use to create different types of communication plans on decide how to communicate it to
Project Options that they can think about as they are filling out part 2. others in a relevant, effective, and/
Go over available reference materials.* Project slide M. Show students the natural hazard resources using Natural or engaging way. To support this
Hazards Around the World in the student edition. Explain that most, if not all, of the information they need for the practice, use questions like: What
natural hazard will be in the reference deck. Point out that each hazard is organized into different subcategories to is the main idea about how this
make it easier to find information. hazard impacts people? Or, What
are the three most critical pieces of
• About the ____ hazard: This section provides students with an overview of the natural hazard, when the hazard
information to communicate about
tends to strike (if seasonality exists), hazard levels, and what kind of damage can result from the hazard.
______.
• Forecast and Detect: This section gives information about how the hazards are/can be forecasted and detected.
• Warn and Communicate: This section explains how the community can be warned of a hazard and how information
is communicated with the community.
• Reduce Damage: This section explains what can be done before the hazard by members of the community to
reduce damage from the hazard.
• Helpful Resources: The resources found in this section have additional information for students to explore to gather
more information about the hazard.
Materials: Determining Stakeholder Needs, Hazard Communication Planning, Stakeholder Criteria and Constraints Peer *Supporting Students in
Feedback Form, Self-Assessment: Giving and Receiving Feedback, Peer Feedback Guidelines, Obtaining and Communicating Developing and Using Stability
Information about Natural Hazards, computer, variable project materials and Change
Begin compiling information for the communication plan. After orienting students to the handout and resources While students work on obtaining
available, give students time to work through their Hazard Communication Planning.* Some students may request information about a hazard,
extra resources to complete their handouts. One option to help students process information can be found in the take this opportunity to support
“additional resources” section of the Natural Hazards Around the World. In addition to this, many states have state- students in understanding what
specific disaster information readily available online. Here are some easy-to-access national sites for student-driven parts of the system are in place
research: to protect communities while it is
• CDC Disasters Resource Page stable and what parts of the system
are in place to detect and respond
• EPA Disasters Resource Page to sudden changes, such as the
• Ready.gov rapid onset of a natural hazard. In
• Ready.gov for Kids some hazards, communities have
more time to prepare and respond.
• National Weather Service
In other natural hazards, such
• (See the Online Resources Guide for links to these items. www.coreknowledge.org/cksci-online-resources) as earthquakes, the onset of the
Students may need to investigate additional resources and websites beyond this list to obtain information on their hazard is sudden with no warning.
hazard. Emphasize to students that one aspect of this project is gathering reliable information from credible sources. Depending on the hazard under
Take a moment to discuss the initial list of sources that have been provided to them and aspects that make those investigation, students should
sources reliable (i.e., many are government agencies that collect data and monitor hazards around the country). consider how much time people
Provide work time and review student work.* Once students are finished with both parts of Hazard Communication have to prepare and respond with
Planning, have students bring the handout to you. Review the handout with students and ask clarifying questions warning.
about any areas that seem to be lacking information or are incomplete.
Approve an appropriate project format. Look specifically at the project option chosen by each student. Ask
students what method they are going to use to present the information and why they are choosing that method. If
students need additional ideas, the teacher reference, Hazard Communication Project Choice and Platform Information,
can be used by the teacher to help students identify which communication platform or method would help them best
communicate their hazard information based upon their personal strengths and classroom limitations. This reference
can also be used to gain general information about different popular project platforms that may be used during this
project by any student.
Materials: science notebook, 5 sticky dots, Family Hazard Plan, Family Hazard Plan: Hazard-specific Information *Attending to Equity
Gather at the DQB and mark questions we figured out. Present slide P and have students place sticky dots on the It is important to revisit the DQB
class DQB next to the questions that they think we have made progress on.* Then, look for patterns in the sticky dots. to ensure students feel as though
Display slide Q if needed. Have the class discuss the answers to these questions as a group. If you have space, make their questions are valued and
a Takeaways board to record the answers the class comes up with.* Importantly, encourage students to celebrate recognized. While not all questions
their accomplishments as they figured out their questions about the anchoring phenomenon, and other related will have been addressed (it’s
phenomena. Importantly, students might notice that some questions were never figured out. Emphasize for students more likely that most will be at
that sometimes not all questions get answered through initial investigations, and often those questions can be least partially answered), this helps
pursued in later units, grades, or on our own. students see that they have done
hard work to help answer many of
their own questions.
1. Plan ahead.
Determine your pacing to introduce the reading selections, check in with students on their progress, and discuss the
reading content and writing exercise. If you are performing Science Literacy as a structured, weekly routine, you might
implement a schedule like this:
• Monday: Designate a ten-minute period at the beginning of the week to introduce students to the assignment.
• Wednesday: Plan to touch base briefly with students in the middle of the week to answer questions about the
reading, to clarify expectations about the writing exercise, and to help students stay on track.
• Friday: Set aside time at the end of the week to facilitate a discussion about the reading and the writing exercise.
You’ll proceed with the in-class lesson investigations during this week.
• Let students know they will read independently and then complete a short writing assignment. The reading
selection relates to topics they are presently exploring in their Natural Hazards unit science investigations.
• The reading and writing will be completed outside of class (unless you have available class time to allocate).
• Preview the reading. Share a short summary of what students can expect.
First, you will read two mock transcripts from online sources. The first consists of a couple of social media posts about
radiation coming from Fukushima nuclear reactors. The second is a myth-busting article
Next, you’ll take a close look at some natural hazard maps and read a series of text messages about what city to live in.
If this sounds familiar, it should. The texters are members of the fictitious family you met in the Preface to this unit.
Then, you’ll read a simulated journal entry from a FEMA contractor, who describes the damage to homes done by
Hurricane Katrina in 2005.
deliver. Emphasize that Science Literacy exercises are brief. The focus is on thoughtful quality of a small product, not
on the assignment being big and complex.
For this assignment you will be expected to generate a well-reasoned paragraph addressed to the family introduced in
the Preface of this unit. You’ll give the family your best advice about how to solve their problem of deciding where their EP 4
Touch base midweek with students to make sure they are on track while working independently. You may choose to
administer a midweek minute-quiz to give students a concrete reason not to postpone completing the reading until
the last minute. Ask questions such as these, and have students jot answers on a half sheet of paper:
• Refer students to the Exercise Page 4. Provide more specific guidance about expectations for students’ deliverables Exercise Page
due at the end of the week.
The writing expectation for this assignment is to develop a well-reasoned paragraph that states a claim about what the
family introduced in the Preface should do to reduce their risks related to natural hazards.
EP 4
Use what you know about Claims-Evidence-Reasoning to help you plan what you will say.
You may want to refresh your memory of the scenario by rereading the Preface to this unit, called “Put Yourself in This
Scene.”
Also, pay special attention to the reading in Collection 4 that features the same characters and situation.
But don’t overlook evidence from other readings, as well as Lessons 8, 9, and 10, that will help you give the best advice
to the family.
The important criteria for your work are that you write a clear claim to answer the question “Where should the family
move, and what can they do after they move to reduce the risks related to natural hazards?” and support it with
reasoning that uses evidence from this unit.
• Answer any questions students may have relative to the reading content or the exercise expectations.
Facilitate class discussion about the reading collection and writing exercise. Students begin the reading activity by Student Reader
thinking critically about online claims related to radiation leaks that might—or might not—have been carried across
the Pacific Ocean.
Collection 4
For more information about the approach to assessment and general program rubrics, visit the Teacher Handbook.
Lesson-by-Lesson Assessment Opportunities
Every lesson includes one or more lesson-level performance expectations (LLPEs). The structure of every LLPE is
designed to be a three-dimensional learning, combining elements of science and engineering practices, disciplinary
core ideas and cross cutting concepts. The font used in the LLPE indicates the source/alignment of each piece of the
text used in the statement as it relates to the NGSS dimensions: alignment to Science and Engineering Practice(s),
alignment to Cross-Cutting Concept(s), and alignment to the Disciplinary Core Ideas.
The table below summarizes opportunities in each lesson for assessing every lesson-level performance expectation
(LLPE). Examples of these opportunities include student handouts, home learning assignments, progress trackers, or
student discussions. Most LLPEs are recommended as potential formative assessments. Assessing every LLPE listed can
be logistically difficult. Strategically picking which LLPEs to assess and how to provide timely and informative feedback
to students on their progress toward meeting these is left to the teacher’s discretion.
Lesson 2
Build the first causal link between the type of earthquakes that cause tsunamis.
TEACHER RESOURCES
2b. Use the descriptions of each location to rate which places are most at risk for damage to people and property by
NATURAL HAZARDS | 247
TEACHER RESOURCES
Part 3. Using what we understand about forecasting which types of places and communities are most at risk for
NATURAL HAZARDS | 248
damage from tsunamis, let’s think about the coast of Japan. The map below shows an area called Fudai. This is a hilly
region, and the darker areas on the map mean there is a steep incline and higher elevation, while the lighter areas are
lower elevations or flatter.
If Japan has limited resources for the next year to help keep people and property safe from tsunami damage, which
part of the coast would you predict would be most at risk and prioritize sending resources to? Circle that area on the
map and then explain your reasoning.
TEACHER RESOURCES
LESSON 4: ANSWER KEY
4.A Apply scientific ideas to construct an explanation for how sudden changes in the ocean floor during an earthquake lead to the formation of a tsunami.
4.B Construct an explanation that includes qualitative relationships between variables (distance to epicenter, shoreline topography) to predict which
communities are most at risk for damage as a result of a sudden change.
SEPs DCIs CCCs
Apply scientific ideas, principles, and/or evidence to construct, revise and/or Mapping the history of natural hazards in Stability might be disturbed
use an explanation for real-world phenomena, examples, or events. a region, combined with an understanding either by sudden events
Construct an explanation that includes qualitative or quantitative relationships of related geologic forces can help forecast or gradual changes that
between variables that predict(s) and/or describe(s) phenomena. the locations and likelihoods of future accumulate over time.
events. (MS- ESS3.B) The primary crosscutting
Across the written (or oral) tasks, look for students applying ideas and
evidence from Lessons 2 and 3 about: The tasks on the assessment require concept lens on this
students to use ideas about related assessment is that of stability
• the characteristics of earthquakes likely to cause tsunamis and why, geologic forces (e.g., earthquakes) and the and change, and specifically,
• the point of formation of the tsunami (e.g., the earthquake epicenter), formation of tsunamis. how a sudden event can
• distance between the origin and the shoreline, and Additionally, students weigh the risks of disturb the stability of a
different locations based on distance and region. Look for students to
• the topography of the shoreline and the local communities there.
topography. include ideas about which
Look for how students apply science ideas to support their explanations. communities are most at risk
Are there patterns in science ideas present or missing from all students’ Finally, look for students to consider how to for a tsunami, particularly as
explanations? Students may also bring evidence from the classroom or their plan for future protection along the coast it relates to how quickly they
experiences to bolster their explanations. of Fudai, Japan, by using those same ideas. must respond and why.
Design solution Student considerations Questions to extend students’ thinking Target observations or ideas
Seawall Ocean views may not We think the view may not be important, but are Seawalls are rated lower than other solutions in the
be important to the any other criteria or constraints more important ability to break waves. The waves at Ryoishi were
residents. than others? high, so Ryoishi may need a design that can break
Rated higher on other waves more effectively.
things than most other Reevaluate the criterion and constraints based
solutions. upon Ryoishi’s needs.
Levee or sea dike Highest-rated overall. Even though this is the highest-rated solution Reevaluate the notes considering Ryoishi’s needs,
Doesn’t cost much overall, Ryoishi experienced higher-than-predicted because a levee/sea dike performs worse with
compared to the others. waves during the 2011 tsunami. Does this solution higher waves.
meet the potential wave heights of future tsunamis
Doesn’t require much that might reach Ryoishi?
maintenance.
How well does a levee or sea dike meet the need to Determine that a levee/sea dike does not meet the
break up the waves? criteria for the community’s needs as well as other
solutions do.
Engineering Self-Assessment
Read each statement and circle how well you did it:
1 - I need to work on this, or I did not do it.
2 - OK—this is an area that you did well on but could improve your work.
3 - GREAT—this is an area that you really did well on.
In this unit, I. . . Student Teacher
identified a set of criteria for a given problem. 123 123
identified a set of constraints for a given problem in a given context. 123 123
considered positive and negative consequences on people when solving a 123 123
given problem.
considered positive and negative consequences on the environment when 123 123
solving a given problem.
considered how impacts on people and the environment could limit 123 123
possible solutions.
used a defined process to evaluate a design solution with respect to both 123 123
criteria and constraints.
prioritized criteria and constraints when evaluating design solutions and 123 123
identified what tradeoffs are made when choosing one design solution
over another.
identified and considered potential stakeholder needs related to each part 123 123
of the design solution.
Explain your ratings and how you think you may change or improve your engineering work in the future:
TEACHER RESOURCES
LESSON 9: RUBRIC
Wildfires VH H M L NR
Thunderstorms VH H M L NR
Winter Storms VH H M L NR
Hurricanes VH H M L NR
Extreme Heat VH H M L NR
Droughts VH H M L NR
Coastal Flooding VH H M L NR
River Flooding VH H M L NR
Earthquakes VH H M L NR
3. Identify a natural hazard that impacts you in some way or that you feel would be important to investigate. It could be one that affects your community, a
community that you are familiar with, or a place you have always wanted to visit. Use evidence from the maps to identify the area at risk for this hazard and
explain why the communities in that area need to understand and prepare for this natural hazard.
One thing I can do better the next time I give feedback is:
9.B Critically read scientific texts adapted for classroom use to obtain scientific and technical information related to predicting the locations and severity of
a hazard and understanding the response systems designed to mitigate the effects.
9.C Communicate scientific and technical information in writing and/or oral presentations about a system designed to meet the criteria and constraints for
communicating with identified stakeholder groups about a natural hazard.
SEPs DCIs CCCs
8.1 Critically read scientific texts adapted for ETS1.A: The more precisely a design task’s Systems may interact with other systems; they
classroom use to determine the central ideas and/ criteria and constraints can be defined, the more may have sub-systems and be a part of larger
or obtain scientific and/or technical information likely it is that the designed solution will be complex systems.
to describe patterns in and/or evidence about the successful. Specification of constraints includes The primary crosscutting concept lens on this
natural and designed world(s). consideration of scientific principles and other assessment is system and system models. As
8.5 Communicate scientific and/or technical relevant knowledge that are likely to limit students develop a communication plan and final
information (e.g., about a proposed object, tool, possible solutions. product, they will communicate different aspects
process, system) in writing and/or through oral ETS1.B: There are systematic processes for of a hazard system designed to prepare, warn,
presentations. evaluating solutions with respect to how well and help people respond in a hazard.
In this final summative task, students will apply they meet the criteria and constraints of a
multiple aspects of SEP 8 Obtaining, Evaluating, problem.
and Communicating information. They should: Students will develop stakeholder criteria and
• identify key science ideas relevant to their constraints for an effective communication
chosen hazard, plan and then apply those ideas to their final
product. The more precisely they define the
• cross-check science and technical ideas and criteria and constraints, the more effective their
evidence across multiple sources, communication plan is likely to be. Scientific
• integrate data and evidence from multiple principles about the hazard and how the system
forms of media, and is designed to prepare, warn, and help people
• demonstrate evidence of careful respond will be a key aspect to look for in student
communication of these ideas to an identified products. The rubric below can then be used by
stakeholder group. students as part of a systematic peer feedback
process to evaluate student products for how well
they meet criteria and constraints.
Category 1 2 3
Obtain information about Identifies where the hazard Identifies where the hazard Identifies where the hazard happens, who
the natural hazard. happens and possible damage that happens, the possible damage that is at risk, possible damage that might result,
can result. can result, and who could be at risk. and how different locations and populations
may be affected differently.
Obtain information about Identifies general information Identifies how some of the Identifies in detail the specific components
components of a system about the detection and warning components of the system work of the system and describes how each
designed to detect, warn, system, and/or solutions to reduce together to detect, warn about, and/ component works together to detect, warn,
and reduce damage. damage. or reduce damage to communities. and reduce damage.
Obtain information about Identifies a general group of Identifies different stakeholder Identifies different stakeholder groups and
community stakeholders community stakeholders for the groups and 1–2 criteria and/or clearly outlines criteria and constraints and
criteria and constraints. communication plan. constraints and/or addresses them addresses those in the plan.
in the plan.
Obtain information from No sources are included. Sources are included, but little to no Sources and evidence of their credibility are
reliable sources and evaluate information is provided about the included.
its credibility. credibility of the source.
Communicate information Shares information about Shares detailed information about Shares detailed information about the natural
to stakeholders about the the natural hazard and some the natural hazard and some hazard and tailors information about how to
natural hazard and how information about how to prepare. information about how to prepare prepare for the hazard to specific stakeholder
to prepare for the natural for the hazard. group(s).
hazard.
Communicate information to Shares some information about Shares information about how to Shares level of detail appropriate to the
stakeholders about how to what to do during a natural hazard. respond during and after a natural project type about what to do during and
respond during and after a hazard. after a natural hazard with options for action
natural hazard. tailored to specific stakeholder groups.
Information is accessible Final product communicates basic Final product uses everyday Final product thoughtfully pairs symbols,
to a targeted group of information to stakeholders. language along with symbols images, and text in a way that communicates
stakeholders. and images to communicate important ideas to stakeholder group(s) in
information. everyday or easy-to-understand language.
Additional category:
Additional category:
9.A Use digital tools to analyze patterns in large data sets (maps) of the history of natural hazards in regions and use this information to forecast future risk.
SEP DCI CCC
5.1 Use digital tools (e.g., computers) to analyze Mapping the history of natural hazards in a 1.4 Graphs, charts, and images can be used to
very large data sets for patterns and trends. region, combined with an understanding of identify patterns in data.
related geologic forces can help forecast the
locations and likelihoods of future events (MS-
ESS3.B).
Students use digital interactive maps to explore The focus of this assessment task is on Look for how students use maps to identify
hazard risk data across nine different hazards that comparing the varying historical levels of risk general regional patterns in risk as well as their
affect the United States. Students will use the of nine different hazards to determine which own local pattern of risk. Regional patterns of risk
digital tool to look at the larger pattern of risk for locations are more or less at risk. Students use include identifying places at greater and lesser
a hazard (e.g., what parts of the United States are this risk evidence to explain which hazards they risk.
most or less at risk). Then they can zoom into their are at risk for and provide a rationale for why
local county level to assess localized levels of risk communication to certain communities at risk is
for each hazard. important.
Hazard Describe the general patterns of risk for this natural hazard in the Level of risk of Notes: My experiences
United States this hazard for my with or wonderings
community about this hazard
Wildfires Places in the western half of the United States are more at risk than the eastern This column varies based This column varies based
half of the United States, except for Florida, which has higher levels of risk. There on location. Check the on student experiences
are some smaller pockets of risk, but the highest risk is generally in the west. level of risk for your or wonderings. Look
communities to create for how students
Thunderstorms Communities in the midwestern and southern United States are most at risk,
a localized key for this incorporate these
from Texas to Chicago and then to Florida. The western and northernmost parts
column. experiences or curiosities
of the United States are not really at risk.
into their responses for
Winter Storms The western and northern part of the United States are most at risk, and some Questions 2 and 3 below.
places in the Rocky Mountains, Appalachian, and Sierra Nevada mountains. The
southern part of the United States is not really at risk for winter storms.
Hurricanes Communities along the Gulf Coast and Atlantic Ocean are most at risk of
hurricanes, but communities in the rest of the United States are not at risk for
this hazard.
Extreme Heat Places at highest risk are around the center of the United States near Missouri,
Kansas, Arkansas, and Oklahoma, and the southwest around Arizona, and a
small area near Philadelphia. Most of the west and northeast is at a lower risk.
Droughts Most of the western United States is at a very high risk of drought, except for
the northwest corner. There is also an area in Georgia at higher risk, but most of
the eastern United States is at a lower risk.
Coastal Flooding All counties along the Pacific and Atlantic Coasts are at moderate to very high
risk of coastal flood. Counties not on the coast are not at risk.
River Flooding Places in the northeast, central, and southwest are all at risk for river flooding.
There are places all over the United States that are at risk though. The lowest
risk is found in the northwestern United States.
Earthquakes The western United States is most at risk, and also the area between St. Louis,
Memphis, and Nashville in the center of the United States. There is some risk in
the northeastern parts of the United States. The rest of the United States is at
little or no risk of earthquakes.
Editorial Director
Daniel H. Franck
Source Material Attribution OpenSciEd Oklahoma Kate Schulz
The development of the original material in this unit (Copyright © 2021 James Ryan, Executive Director Tiffany Neill Erin Escher
OpenSciEd) was supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Carnegie Sarah Delaney, Director of Science Susan Wray Washington
Corporation of New York, Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation, Rhode Island Ellen Ebert
Matt Krehbeil, Director of Outreach
and William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.
The OpenSciEd name is subject to the Creative Commons license and may Developers Consortium Leadership Field Test Teachers
not be used without the prior and express written consent of OpenSciEd. Daniel C. Edelson, Director California Rachel Harris
This curriculum includes images that are public domain, openly licensed, Audrey Mohan, Associate Director Dawn Arbogast Charles (Chuck) Hickey
or used by explicit agreement with their owners. See the attribution Michelle Baptista Mary Holland
information with each image for ownership details and any restrictions Professional Learning Center at Boston College
on its use. Unless otherwise noted in the image attribution information, Katherine McNeill, Director Monica Cordisco Johanna Mendillo
all images are licensed for distribution under the terms of the Creative Renee Affolter, Assoc. Director Sarah Couris Jennifer Nissley
Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) by OpenSciEd or by their respective Instructional Materials Center at BSCS Science Learning Kia Gregory Ron Puerta
owners, or they are in the public domain. Bruce Hansen New Jersey
Daniel C. Edelson, Director
Unit Development Team Audrey Mohan, Associate Director Bruce Jennings Thomas Clayton
Audrey Mohan, Unit Lead, BSCS Science Learning Field Test Implementation and Evaluation Center at Charles A. Anya Pierre Ian Levine
Whitney Smith, Unit Lead, BSCS Science Learning Dana Center, The University of Texas at Austin Gilly Ryan Kim Tota
Ari Jamshidi, Writer, University of California, Berkeley Carolyn Landel, Director Robert Seagraves Oklahoma
Natalie Keigher, Writer, Lisle Junior High School Sara Spiegel, Assoc. Director, Implementation Robert Sherriff Brandy Criminger
Dawn Novak, Writer, BSCS Science Learning Carol Pazera, Assoc. Director, Evaluation Destiny Westbrooks Susan McClarty
Tracey Ramirez, Writer, The Charles A. Dana Center, The University of Texas Field Test Evaluation Center at Digital Promise Louisiana Rhode Island
at Austin Taylor Garrett Linda Grandchamp
Andrew Krumm, Director
Abe Lo, Reviewer, PD design, BSCS Science Learning Emily Hurst Michael Romano
William Penuel, University of Colorado, Boulder, Co-Director
Mikala Popovec, Pilot teacher, Chicago Public Schools Belinda Mire
Instructional Materials Center at Northwestern University
Ty Scaletta, Pilot teacher, Chicago Public Schools Massachusetts
Brian Reiser, Director
Katie Van Horne, Assessment Specialist, Concolor Research Michael Clinchot
Michael Novak, Associate Director
Jerry Mitchell, Unit Advisory Chair, University of South Carolina Jenna Decker
Brittany Bird, Advisory Team, Hermosa Middle School State Steering Committee
Cindy Colomb, Advisory Team, Hermosa Middle School California Massachusetts
Michael Novak, Advisory Team, Northwestern University Kathy DiRanna Erin Hashimoto-Martell
Karla White, Advisory Team, Bethany Public Schools Phil Lafontaine Nicole Scola
Jill Grace Hillary Metcalf
Production Team Iowa Michigan
BSCS Science Learning Tami Plein Mary Starr
Kate Herman, Copyeditor, Independent Contractor Louisiana New Jersey
Rosemi Mederos, Copyeditor, Independent Contractor Jill Cowart Michael Heinz
Renee DeVaul, Project Coordinator Lydia Hill New Mexico
Valerie Maltese, Marketing Specialist & Project Coordinator Breigh Rhodes Yanira Vazquez
Chris Moraine, Multimedia Graphic Designer Shafiq Chaudhary
Kate Chambers, Multimedia Graphic Designer
Illustration and Photo Credits Core Knowledge Foundation Core Knowledge Foundation
Alan Curtis / Alamy Stock Photo: 112
Science Literacy Student Reader Science Literacy Development Partner
Andrei Krauchuk / Alamy Stock Vector: 8d
Six Red Marbles
DOD Photo / Alamy Stock Photo: 204 Subject Matter Expert
Carri Walters
Drew Buckley / Alamy Stock Photo: 247c Terri L. Woods, PhD
Executive Editor
Gunter Kirsch / Alamy Stock Photo: 247b Associate Professor
Kimberly Merlino
IanDagnall Computing / Alamy Stock Photo: Cover C Department of Geology
Writer
Joana Kruse / Alamy Stock Photo: 247a East Carolina University
MBI / Alamy Stock Photo: Cover A, i Greenville, NC
NOAA: 6, 72, 141
REUTERS / Alamy Stock Photo: 3a, 23
Rostislav Glinsky / Alamy Stock Photo: 247d
Within this publication, the Core Knowledge Foundation has provided hyperlinks to independently owned and operated sites whose content supports the unit instruction. At
the time of publication, all links were valid and operational, and the content accessed by the links provided additional information that supported the Core Knowledge curricular
content and/or lessons. Please note that we do not monitor the links or the content of such sites on an ongoing basis and both may be constantly changing. We have no control
over the links, the content, or the policies, information-gathering or otherwise, of such linked sites.
By accessing these third-party sites and the content provided therein, you acknowledge and agree that the Core Knowledge Foundation makes no claims, promises, or guarantees
about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the content of such third-party websites and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in either the links themselves
or the contents of such sites. If you experience any difficulties when attempting to access one of the linked resources found within these materials, please contact the Core
Knowledge Foundation:
www.coreknowledge.org/contact-us/
Core Knowledge Foundation
801 E. High St.
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Core Knowledge Curriculum Series™
CK Sci™
Core Knowledge Science™
Natural Hazards
Core Knowledge Science 6
Unit 5 Unit 5
For which grade levels are these books intended?
Natural Hazards:
Science
Natural Hazards:
In general, the content and presentation are appropriate for
Science Literacy
CK Sci™ ™
pics from
Natural Hazards: Where Coredo natural
Knowledge Sciencehazards happen, and
concepts specified in the Core Knowledge Sequence units at this level include:
•
Procedure Guide
Student Reader
units of study.
Cells and Systems
www.coreknowledge.org
ISBN: 978-1-68380-708-7
CKSci™
ISBN: 978-1-68380-706-3
www.coreknowledge.org
ISBN: 978-1-68380-793-3
Core Knowledge Curriculum Series™