Oyinkansola Project Write Up 1-5
Oyinkansola Project Write Up 1-5
BY
201638
Nano fertilizers offer a more efficient way to increase crop production and save
resources by improving fertilizer uptake and utilization in the soil. These
nanomaterials, which can be either macro or micro nutrients themselves or act as
carriers or additives, have a high surface area to volume ratio, nanometer regime, and
unique properties that make them effective for faster growth and yield of plants and
also improve the quality of soil. Their use can reduce pollution from the overuse of
inorganic fertilizers and pesticides, while their targeted delivery efficiency means they
can detect pollutants, plant diseases, pests and pathogens, as well as control the
delivery of nutrients, fertilizers, and pesticides.
Justification
High soil salinity leads to poor germination, delayed stand establishment, and reduces
subsequent growth and yield of pepper. Seed germination and seedling emergence are
essential developmental stages for successful establishment of pepper. Previous
research observation indicated that it is more difficult for pepper to uptake nutrients in
stressed soils. Hence, elevated soil salinity and/or inadequate water supply can further
reduce the seedling establishment of pepper.
Objective
To determine the effects of the different fertilizers on the growth and nutrient
uptake of pepper under salinity stress.
To determine the effect of AMF and Nano fertilizer in bio remediating saline
soils.
Pepper is one of the most important crops in the world and is grown in a variety
of soils, including salinized soils. In order to maximize nutrient uptake in salinized
soils, it is important to understand the effects of salt, soil pH, and irrigation
management on pepper growth and yield. By utilizing the strategies mentioned above,
it is possible to improve nutrient uptake in salinized soils and maximize the yield and
quality of pepper crops. Salt is one of the major abiotic factors that affect pepper
growth and yield. High salt concentrations in soils can inhibit root growth and nutrient
uptake, as well as reduce yield and quality of the crop. Salt can also increase soil pH,
which can lead to a decrease in nutrient availability for the plant. Therefore, it is
important to manage salt concentrations in soils in order to maximize pepper growth
and yield.
Soil pH is another important factor that influences the growth and yield of pepper
plants. The ideal soil pH for pepper production is between 6.5 and 7.5. Soil pH can be
managed through the use of soil amendments, such as lime or sulfur, to adjust the pH
to the desired level. Additionally, soil pH can also be managed through the use of
fertilizers, such as nitrogen, that are specifically designed for pepper production.
Soil salinity is a major issue that affects millions of hectares of land around the
world. It is caused when too much salt accumulates in the soil, resulting in reduced
crop yields, soil degradation, and water pollution. It is the accumulation of salts in the
soil, mostly as a result of evaporation of water. The salts are naturally occurring
minerals, but can be increased by human activities such as irrigation, which can add
more salt to the soil (Edwards and Reider, 1989). When the salt content in the soil
increases, it reduces the water infiltration rate, the amount of water that can be taken
up by plants, and the availability of nutrients. This can lead to decreased crop yields
and soil degradation.
Soil salinity is a soil condition that can adversely affect the growth of crops due to the
presence of salt in the rooting zone. The osmotic potential of the soil is increased by
the presence of salts, leading to a reduction in the amount of water available to the
crop. Salinity can have a particularly detrimental effect on the germination and
emergence of crops, with some plants being more susceptible than others depending
on the type of root system and growth habit (Bowden and Daniel, 1998).
Soil salinity can have a number of negative impacts on crop production and soil
health. The most immediate effect is decreased crop yields. High soil salinity can
reduce water availability and the availability of nutrients, which can lead to stunted
plants and reduced yields. Additionally, high salt concentrations can cause soil to
become waterlogged, leading to anaerobic conditions that can further reduce crop
yields. Soil salinity can also reduce soil fertility and cause long-term degradation of
soil quality. Soil salinity can also have environmental impacts. High salinity levels
can lead to water pollution, as salt-laden water can leak into nearby waterways.
Additionally, soil salinity can reduce the diversity of plant species in an area, as some
plants are more tolerant of salinity than others.
The structure of the soil can have a detrimental effect on the water and air
circulation, thus impeding the growth of roots and hindering plants from optimizing
their use of water and nutrients. Furthermore, the structure of the soil can limit the
depth to which roots can spread. The composition of soil structure is significant
because it affects the ability of the soil to store and allow the passage of water,
nutrients, and oxygen that are necessary for the growth of roots. Soil water movement
plays an integral role in sustaining plant growth. Water is absolutely essential for plant
growth, as it serves as a major nutrient for metabolism (Kuncuro et al., 2014).
Compacted soil structure can impede a plant's ability to absorb water from the soil,
which can have a negative impact on the crop yield. Large pores are more adept at
facilitating water movement in the soil, but compaction can reduce the amount of pore
space available and thus limit both the rate of water infiltration and drainage (Obafemi
O. O. and Mouiz A. Y, 2019). Plant roots would need to use more strength in order to
break through the compressed layer of soil, as the stiffness of the soil increases when
it is compressed.
Soil salinity can lead to flocculation, which is the binding together of fine soil
particles. This process has many positive effects on soil physical properties, such as
improved aeration, enhanced root penetration and improved root growth (Nikos et al.,
2003). However, while increasing soil solution salinity has a positive effect on soil
aggregation and stabilization, at high levels salinity there is a very negative impact
and potentially lethal effects on plants growth and yield. Excess salinity in soil water
can decrease plant available water and cause plant stress. Salts, such as sodium and
chloride, can alter the composition of the soil, leading to changes in soil texture,
structure, and bulk density.
Salinity can alter soil texture by decreasing the amount of silt and clay particles in the
soil. This can lead to an increase in sand particles, resulting in a coarser soil texture.
Salinity can also affect the structure of the soil, resulting in a decrease in the size of
the soil aggregates and an increase in the porosity of the soil. This can lead to a
decrease in water-holding capacity and an increase in the rate of water infiltration.
The soil bulk density is not exempted, as the concentration of salts in the soil
increases, the bulk density of the soil increases because of the presence of the heavier
salt particles. This can lead to a decrease in the infiltration rate of water, as well as a
decrease in the amount of available water for plant growth.
Salinity causes ion toxicity and upsets the soil nutritional balance. It alters the
soil nutrient cycles and decomposition processes (Wong et al. 2005). Salt stress has a
damaging effect on plants and soil microbiota, disrupting cellular activities and
leading to the death of organisms. High salt concentration impedes many microbial
activities such as respiration and nitrogen mineralization, and also inhibits the activity
of enzymes like dehydrogenase, β-glucosidase, urease, protease, alkaline and acid
phosphatase, arylsulfatase and argininamide hydrolase. Additionally, increased
salinity alters root exudates, requiring soil microorganisms to spend energy to
maintain their osmotic balance, resulting in a decrease in microbial population and the
ability of root attachment in the rhizosphere (Sritongon et al., 2022).
AMF that are commonly found in salt-affected soils (Juniper and Abbott, 1993)
are considered tolerant isolates. These AMF possess a greater capacity for promoting
the survival and growth of host plants compared to species or isolates from normal
edaphic conditions. AMF symbiosis in plants can help counteract the effects of salt-
stressed soil, as it helps to increase the uptake of less-mobile phosphorus and other
essential nutrients by extending the external hyphal network of the plant beyond the
zone of nutrient depletion. This has been demonstrated to lead to increased uptake of
phosphate ions, along with Ca2+, Mg2+ and Zn2+, which are otherwise less available
to plants (Azcón-Aguilar et al. 1979). AMF helps plants cope with salinity stress by
improving soil characteristics, increasing nutrient and water availability, enhancing
root and shoot biomass development, and strengthening the plant's antioxidant
enzyme systems (Manoj et al., 2020). In addition, AMF upregulate the synthesis and
accumulation of compatible organic osmolytes such as proline and employed this
mechanism to maintain the osmotic balance of plant cell under external salt stress
environment (Ahanger et al. 2014).
Pepper is an early maturing annual herb with a deep taproot and lateral roots
that can spread up to 50-60 cm wide. Its flowers are small with white or purple petals,
developing into berries with white seeds. Previous studied samples of pepper plants
and strains of AMF showed that pepper was found to form an association with
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, even though the degree of the association varied.
Inoculating pepper plants with this fungus had a notable effect on fruit maturity,
economic yield, and disease tolerance when compared to the control. The positive
effect on pepper production is due to the increased soil fertility and plant productivity
that this association provides.
Claudia Castillo R. et al. (2009) discovered in a research that “In comparison to a
commercial inoculant, Glomusclaroideum AMF inoculant had a positive effect on
chili pepper production, resulting in healthier plants with increased foliar area and
shoot/root ratio, faster fruiting and improved quality, and increased soil fungal
propagule numbers, than Glomusintraradices. The application of Arbuscular
Mycorrhizal fungi has been shown to be a successful treatment for controlling the
severity of pepper foot rot in infected soils. The single application of mycorrhizae was
found to be more effective in reducing the rate of disease spread than sterilizing the
soil with hot water vapor for 3 hours. With the additional use of Arbuscular
Mycorrhizal fungi, the disease was successfully managed on pepper seedlings
(Getachew Yilma, 2019). The use of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) also
provides a sustainable and environmentally safe way to improve salinity tolerance in
plants. AMF can help alleviate the detrimental effects of salinity on the growth of
pepper by improving nutrition (higher K and P and lower Na concentrations in leaf
tissue) and cell membrane stability, particularly at high P concentration and high-
saline conditions (Beltrano et al., 2013).
2.8 Nanofertilizer
EXPERIMENTAL MATERIALS
Perforated experimental pots and pepper seeds was purchased from the local market
(pots that can hold about 5kg of soil), Nano fertilizer made with plantain peels,
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi. The AMF species was prepared and multiplied using
maize as host for three months. Soil sample (top soil) was collected afterwards from
COLANIM farm at Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta.
In order to study the effects of the different fertilizers on the growth and
nutrient uptake of pepper under salinity stress except for treatment 1, the same amount
of fertilizer was applied to the soils of the other treatments. In addition, in order to
eliminate the effects of pesticides on the growth and ecology of pepper, pesticides and
other herbicides was not added to this experiment during the pepper growing season.
NURSERY OPERATION
Two pepper seeds were sown in each experimental pot in 0.5 – 1cm (0.2-0.4) depth.
Seedling was afterwards transplanted at the age of 5 - 6 weeks after planting, in which
they have developed 5 - 6 real leaves and they have reached a height of 15 - 30 cm (6
- 12 inches).
DATA COLLECTION
The plant and soil parameters were collected at 6 WAP, 8 WAP, and 10 WAP.
GROWTH PARAMETERS
Growth parameters which were recorded during the experiment were Plant height,
Leaf length, Ph content, Chlorophyll content, Chlorophyll a, b, Total chlorophyll,
Catenoid level, Leaf rolling score, Root length, Root density, Root volume, Root dry
weight, Root fresh weight.
Also, a routine analysis was carried out on the initial soil samples.
DATA ANALYSIS
Data was subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA), using Duncan Multiple Range
Test (DMRT) to separate the means at 5% probability level using statistical package
for social sciences (SPSS).
CHAPTER 4
RESULTS AND OVERVIEW
Table 1: Effect of Nano-fertilizer and Arbuscular Mychorrizal fungi species inoculation on
the uptake of N, P, K and Na by Pepper
Table 1 showed the Effect of Nano-fertilizer and Arbuscular Mychorrizal fungi species
inoculation on the uptake of N, P, K and Na by Pepper. The table presented that there was no
significant difference (P ≥ 0.05) in the different strains of AMF and Nano fertilizer in the
nutrient uptake characterization by Pepper plant. The inoculation of pepper with Funelliformis
mossea showed a significantly higher uptake in N, P, K, and Na. While inoculation with Glumus
etunicartum had a lower uptake of N, P, K, and Na. Strains of Nanofertilizer showed a
significantly higher uptake in K, and a lower uptake of N in pepper plant. The experiment also
showed that ZnFe (Ironoxide and Zincoxide) had a significantly lower uptake of N, P, K, and Na,
while plants treated with Fe (Ironoxide) had a significantly higher uptake of N, P, K, and Na.
Table 1: Effect of Nano-fertilizer and Arbuscular Mychorrizal fungi species inoculation on
the uptake of N, P, K and Na by Pepper
Treatments N P K Na
AMF
Control 1.09 1.49 10.06 5.04
Fm 1 1.96 13.29 6.64
Ge 1.14 1.43 9.57 4.74
Ri 1.16 2.03 13.43 6.6
LSD ns ns ns ns
NANO
Control 1.19 1.84 12.41 6
Fe 1.19 1.93 13.12 6.2
Zn 1.15 1.86 12.18 6.11
ZnFe 0.86 1.28 8.65 4.28
LSD ns ns ns ns
NaCl
control 0.99 1.46 10.18 4.7
25% 1.24 1.69 11.13 5.33
50% 1.07 2.03 13.45 7.23
LSD ns ns ns ns
INTERACTION
AMF x NANO ns ns ns ns
AMF x NaCl ns ns ns ns
NANO x NaCl ns ns ns ns
AMF x NANO x NaCl ns ns ns ns
Fm- Funelliformis mossea, Ri- Rhizophagus irregularis, Ge- Glumus etunicartum, Fe- Ironoxide, Zn- Zincoxide,
ZnFe- Zincoxide and Ironoxide, AMF- Arbuscular Mycorrizal fungi, NANO- Nanofertilizer, NaCl- Sodiumchloride
CHAPTER 5
Discussion
The experiment revealed that in plants inoculated with AMF, Potassium exhibited
a higher uptake while Nitrogen had a lower uptake effect in pepper plant. Pots
inoculated with Glumus etunicartum (a strain of AMF) showed a significantly
lower uptake in P, K, and Na except N. Nano fertilizer also showed a higher uptake
in K by pepper plant, however, there was a significantly lower uptake of N in pots
inoculated with Nanofertilizer. Pots treated with ZnFe exhibited lower uptake of
N<P<K<Na, respectively. NaCl (at 50%) impeded a higher uptake of P, K and Na,
except N. the interaction of the inoculants and fertilizer showed no significant
effect on the uptake of N, P, K and Na. Furthermore, the combined interaction of
the inoculants and the salt contaminant also showed no significant effect on the
uptake of N, P, K and Na.
Conclusion
The study concludes that the application of Rhizophagus irregularis aided a higher stimulation of
N, P, K and Na uptake in pepper cultivated under salt stressed soil. However, the study
demonstrated that nano fertilizer with Zincoxide (ZnFe), had a higher uptake of N, P and K
except Na.
Recommendation
Hence, the study recommends that AMF strain of Rhizophagus irregularis is a great bio-
stimulant in the uptake of NPK in salt stressed soils.
References
Christian O Dimkpa, Prem S Bindraban, “ Nanofertilizers: new products for the industry? 6462-
6473, 2017.
Eckhard George, Arbuscular Mycorrhizas; physiology and function, 307-343, 2000. Hemraj
Chhipa, “Nanofertilizers and nano prsticides for agriculture” 15-22, 2017.
Edwards, A.C., and R.J. Reider. “Soil Salinity and Irrigation Management.” Journal of Soil and
Water Conservation, vol. 44, no. 5, 1989, pp. 535–540.
Bowden, J.W., and T.C. Daniel. “Soil Salinity and Its Management for Crop Production.”
Journal of Production Agriculture, vol. 11, no. 4, 1998, pp. 437–444.
Dimkpa C., Weinand T., Ash F. Plant-rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions. Plant
Cell Environ. 2009;32:1682–1694.
Niste, Monica & Vidican, Roxana & Rotar, Ioan & Stoian, Vlad & Pop, Rodica & Vasilica, Miclea.
(2014). Plant Nutrition Affected by Soil Salinity and Response of Rhizobium Regarding the Nutrients
Accumulation.
Olubanjo, Obafemi & Yessoufou, Mouiz. (2019). Effect of Soil Compaction on the Growth and Nutrient
Uptake of Zea Mays L.. Sustainable Agriculture Research. 8. 46. 10.5539/sar.v8n2p46.
Nikos J. Warrence, Krista E. Pearson, and James W. Bauder (2003). Basics of Salinity and Sodicity
Effects on Soil Physical Properties.
Sritongon, N., Sarin, P., Theerakulpisut, P. et al. The effect of salinity on soil chemical characteristics,
enzyme activity and bacterial community composition in rice rhizospheres in Northeastern Thailand. Sci
Rep 12, 20360 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24902-2
Becerra A, Bartoloni N, Cofré N, Soteras F, Cabello M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in saline soils:
vertical distribution at different soil depth. Braz J Microbiol. 2014 Aug 29;45(2):585-94. doi:
10.1590/s1517-83822014000200029. PMID: 25242945; PMCID: PMC4166286.
Klinsukon, C., Lumyong, S., Kuyper, T.W. et al. Colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improves
salinity tolerance of eucalyptus (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) seedlings. Sci Rep 11, 4362 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84002-5.
Azcón-Aguilar, C., Azcón, R., & Barea, J. M. (1979). Endomycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium as
biological fertilizers for Medicago sativa in normal cultivation. Nature, 279, 325–327.
Juniper, S., & Abbott, L. K. (1993). Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas and soil salinity. Mycorrhiza, 4,
45–57
Yadav, Ranjeet Singh & Mahatma, Mahesh & Polavakkalipalayam Palanisamy, Thirumalaisamy &
Meena, Hari & Bhaduri, Debarati & Arora, Sanjay & Panwar, Jitendra. (2017). Arbuscular Mycorrhizal
Fungi (AMF) for Sustainable Soil and Plant Health in Salt-Affected Soils. 10.1007/978-3-319-48257-6_7.
Ahanger, M. A., S. R. Tyagi, M. R. Wani, and P. Ahmad. 2014. Drought tolerance: Role of organic
osmolytes, growth regulators, and mineral nutrients. In Physiological mechanisms and adaptation
strategies in plants under changing environment; Vol. 1, ed. P. Ahmad and M. R. Wani, 25–55. New
York, NY: Springer.
Manoj Parihar , Amitava Rakshit , Kiran Rana , Gopal Tiwari & Surendra
Singh Jatav (2020): The Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Inoculation in Mitigating Salt
Stress of Pea (PisumSativum L.), Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, DOI:
10.1080/00103624.2020.1784917.
P. Selva Preetha and N. Balakrishnan (2017); A Review of Nano Fertilizers and Their Use and Functions
in Soil. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 6
Number 12 (2017) pp. 3117-3133, DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.612.364.
Chuprova VV, Ulyanova OA, and Kulebakin VG (2004) The effect of bark–zeolite fertilizers on mobile
humus substances of chernozem and on biological productivity of Corn. Poster presented Euro
Soil,Freiburg, Germany. 4-12p.
Jinghua G (2004) Synchrotron radiation, soft Xray spectroscopy and nano-materials. J Nanotech 1(1-2):
193-225.
Gupta, Charu & Prof, Dhan. (2020). Effect of nano-fertilizers on soil microflora.
10.21746/aps.2020.9.5.3.
Beltrano, J., Ruscitti, M., Arango, M. C., & Ronco, M. (2013). Effects of arbuscular mycorrhiza
inoculation on plant growth, biological and physiological parameters and mineral nutrition in pepper
grown under different salinity and P levels. Journal of soil science and plant nutrition, 13(1), 123-141.
Getachew Yilma. (2019). The Role of Mycorrhizal Fungi inPepper (Capsicum annuum) Production. Int.
J. Adv. Res. Biol.Sci. 6(12): 59-65. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22192/ijarbs.2019.06.12.008
Guo, H., White, J.C., Wang, Z., Xing, B., 2018. Nano-enabled fertilizers to control the
release and use efficiency of nutrients. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health. 6, 77–83.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2018.07.009
Seleiman, M.F., Almutairi, K.F., Alotaibi, M., Shami, A., Alhammad, B.A., Battaglia, M.L.,
2021. Nano-Fertilization as an emerging fertilization technique: why can modern
agriculture benefit from its use? Plants 10 (1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/
plants10010002.
Kalwani, M., Chakdar, H., Srivastava, A., Pabbi, S., & Shukla, P. (2022). Effects of nanofertilizers on soil
and plant-associated microbial communities: Emerging trends and perspectives. Chemosphere, 287,
132107. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.13
Ahmed Mohamed Abd El-All. Nano-Fertilizer Application to Increase Growth and Yield of Sweet Pepper
under Potassium Levels. Agri Res& Tech: Open Access J. 2019; 19(4): 556098. DOI:
10.19080/ARTOAJ.2019.19.556098