Role of Juvenile Justice System in India
Role of Juvenile Justice System in India
This article provides a detailed discussion regarding the Role of Juvenile Justice
System in India.
Introduction
“We are guilty of many errors and many faults, but our worst crime is abandoning the children,
neglecting the foundation of life. Many of the things we need can wait, the child cannot, right
now is the time his bones are being formed, his blood is being made and his senses are being
developed. To him, we cannot answer ‘tomorrow’. His name is ‘Today’.” – Nobel Laureate
Gabrial Mistral.
The 'Nil Novi Spectrum,' which best represents the Juvenile Justice system,
implies that nothing is new on this planet. This has been an assumption in the
entire globe from ancient times that juveniles should be treated leniently since
there is a school of thinking that they have a tendency to reply carefully and
The Nirbhaya gang rape case, which shocked the entire nation in December 2012,
is the most egregious example of juvenile crime. Because the accused was only 6
months away from becoming an adult, this occurrence has sparked a lot of
discussion. Because a child was involved in such a horrible act, the Indian
legislature decided to pass the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act in 2015.
2|Page
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A CHILD AND A
JUVENILE
According to section 2(e) of the Children Act, 1960, which was in effect from 1960 to 1986[4],
a “child” is defined as a boy or a girl who has not yet reached the age of sixteen or eighteen
years. A “child” is defined in subsection 12 of Section 2 of The Juvenile (Care and Protection)
Act, 2015 as any person under the age of eighteen. The term “child” is divided into two
A child who has committed an offence and was under the age of eighteen at the time of the
offence is classified as “a child in conflict with the law,” while the second category is “a child
in need of care and protection,” which includes any child who is not facing any charges as
Although a child and a juvenile are nearly identical, there are some differences in their
implications and circumstances that distinguish them. Although a child is simply seen as an
innocent individual, the term “juvenile” has a negative legal connotation. Juvenile denotes
immaturity or a young criminal, while child denotes youth and naiveté. In simple terms, if a
3|Page
JUVENILE DELINQUENCY: A RISE IN CURRENT
SCENARIO
Juvenile delinquency includes the involvement of a juvenile in illegal activities or behaviour.
Delinquency may not always be considered a criminal activity, but such behaviour is harmful
The crime rate in India is already on the rise, and what we see now is a rise in juvenile offenders.
The biggest example of such a heinous crime committed by a juvenile would be the Nirbhaya
case of 2012. This outraged the people and so the authorities deemed it fit to change the law.
4|Page
EVOLUTION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN
INDIA
PRE-INDEPENDENCE ERA
Ancient India, though governed by many laws, had hardly any laws specifically dealing with
juvenile delinquency. As the problem of neglected children and juvenile delinquency increased
over time, a need was felt to enact a law in this regard. During the colonial rule, in 1843, the
first centre for these children called “Ragged School” was established by Lord Cornwallis.
After 1850, the Apprentice Act was passed, chronologically the first law to require that children
aged 10–18 years convicted in courts be provided with vocational training as part of their
rehabilitation process. Another landmark law was the Reform Schools Act, 1876 and 1897.
Under the Act, the court was empowered to detain offenders in a correctional school for a
period of two to seven years, but after attaining the age of eighteen, they would not be kept in
these institutions. In addition, the Criminal Procedure Act, 1898 provided special treatment to
juvenile offenders. The Code provided for probation for good conduct by criminals up to the
age of twenty-one. Then the Indian Children Act was enacted by the Indian Prisons Committee
(1919–1920). Under this act, the individual provincial government was empowered to make
separate laws for juveniles in their respective jurisdictions. The provinces of Madras, Bengal
and Bombay passed their own Children’s Acts in 1920, 1922 and 1924 respectively.
5|Page
POST INDEPENDENCE ERA
In 1960, after winning independence, a new act aimed at children was passed. It was the
Children Act of 1960 that established "the care, protection, maintenance, welfare, training,
well as the trial of delinquent children in the Union Territories"[16]. Even after that, the
juvenile justice system had to deal with a number of issues, the most serious of which was that
different states had different laws dealing with juvenile delinquency, resulting in children in
similar situations being judged differently based on different provisions in different laws.
The increasing number of cases of juvenile crimes in the last recent years and the horrific
incident of “Delhi Gang Rape Case” have compelled the law makers to enact laws. The biggest
drawback of this act was that it did not have well-equipped legal provisions and the
deterioration of the juvenile system was also the main reason for stopping juvenile crimes in
India. This act was soon replaced by the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2015.
there existed a need for a more powerful and viable justice framework that focused on
impediment in the form of reformative methods. Juveniles should not be treated as adults,
there were disputes in Parliament that juveniles should be given more room for change or
reconstruction or reform and this is possible only when there is extraordinary justice
framework. Subsequently, new demonstration, for example, to the Juvenile Justice (Care and
Protection of Children) Act, 2015, focused on a juvenile agreed method of mediation and
disposal of cases.
6|Page
Salient Features of the Act are as follows: –
• Section 2(12) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015
defines a child as a person who has not completed the age of 18 years i.e. below the age
of 18 years. The Act has given a classification regarding the term ‘Child’ namely “Child
in need of care and protection” and Section 2 (13) of the Act, talks about “Child in
• A clear distinction was made regarding the aspects of the offences, meaning that
categories of crimes were created as heinous, serious and trivial. Specifications have
been made in respect of juveniles in the age group of 16-18 years who, if committed by
them of any kind of crime, after observing their mental capacity, be tried as an adult.
• Introduction of Juvenile Courts, which meant that special courts had to be set up that
would only try juvenile offences, such as NDPS courts, courts dealing with POCSO,
etc.
• Child Welfare Committee about ‘Child in need of care and protection’ and Juvenile
Justice Board is another authority concerning the ‘Juvenile in conflict with law’.
• Juvenile Justice Board: It is a judiciary body before which children detained or accused
of any crime are brought. It acts as a separate court for juveniles as they do not have to
be taken to regular criminal court. The Board consists of a Judicial Magistrate of the
first class and two social workers, of whom at least one must be a woman. The board is
• Child Welfare Committee: The State Governments constitute these committees in the
districts as per the provisions of the Act. The committees have the power to deal with
need of care and protection as well as to provide for their basic needs and protection.
7|Page
• All child care institutions, whether run by the State Government or by voluntary or non-
Resource Authority (CARA) was given the status of a statutory body to enable it to
perform its functions more effectively. The Act states that the adoption of a child is
IN INDIA
Like various nations, India had a legal system that specifically and explicitly manages the rights
and assurances of juvenile guilty parties who try to handle the issue of juvenile misconduct.
Young children should not be tried in court, rather they should be corrected in the most ideal
way,
They should not be punished by the courts, but they should be given the opportunity to change
Early social controls for a child who violates the law should be established on non-punitive
treatment through a network of organizations, for example: – observation homes and special
homes.
8|Page
CONCLUSION
Children are undoubtedly the future of this world. There is a great need for more reformed
legislation aimed at prevention of such juveniles so that their future and the future of the society
can be secured. It will help to make the world a better place and can also reduce the chances
of future crimes. Even juvenile delinquent acts by children can have a huge impact on their
The rising rate of juvenile delinquency in India is a matter of great concern and needs attention.
Although the government has enacted various laws and regulations to prevent the incidence of
juvenile offences, the current laws on juveniles are not creating a deterrent effect on juveniles
and thus the results are not useful and the legislative intent is not being fulfilled. To prevent
this issue of juvenile delinquency everyone has their own role as society has different role,
parents have different role, rehabilitation homes have been assigned a different role, etc. If all
these factors work accordingly then this real-life problem will be easily solved in very less
time.
REFERENCES
1. Website - https://blog.ipleaders.in/juvenile-justice-system-india/ visited on 17-06-2022
2. Website - https://www.juscorpus.com/the-role-of-the-juvenile-justice-system-in-india/
visited on 17-06-2022
4. Website -
https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/2148?sam_handle=123456789/1362
visited on 18-06-2022
9|Page