0% found this document useful (1 vote)
64 views8 pages

AFFIDAVITOFTRUTHtemplate

Uploaded by

inmychevrolet24
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (1 vote)
64 views8 pages

AFFIDAVITOFTRUTHtemplate

Uploaded by

inmychevrolet24
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH

RE: Matter # CASE NUMBER

IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT FOR THE CITY OF CITY


COUNTY OF COUNTY, STATE OF YOUR STATE

BEFORE ME, the undersigned Notary, , on this


day of Month, 2024, personally appeared First-Middle: Last, known to me to be a credible
individual and of lawful age, who being by me first duly sworn on his oath, deposes and says:

1. Be it known to all who call themselves “government”, their courts, agents, and
other parties, that I, First Middle Last, am a natural, freeborn, sovereign individual without
subjects. I am neither subject to any entity anywhere. I neither dominate anyone nor am I
dominated.

2. I DO NOT recognize and cannot be held in contempt of any law that cannot show a named
individual victim(s), nor can I be held liable in contempt of any law that cannot show any
property that has been stolen or damaged from any said individual or individuals. As the state
itself is not a person, nor a corporation itself can be represented as a single person, the state
cannot represent itself as a property holder nor as an individual person whom is filing a
complaint of stolen property or of physical damage done to itself by a third party. Where no
individual victim and no property stolen or damaged can be found, there can be no defendant nor
prosecutor logically taken into consideration. See “Corpus Delicti” in People v. Lopez, 62 Cal.
Rptr. 47, 254 C.A.2d 185.

3. I am not a person as defined in statutes when such definition includes artificial entities. I
refuse to be treated as a federally or state-created entity which is only capable of exercising
certain rights, privileges, or immunities as specifically granted by federal or state “governments”.

4-A. Since the Constitution is the supposed Supreme Law of the Land from which all
law derives, please show me evidence that I signed and contractually agreed to be bound to any
state or federal constitutions. The Declaration of Independence states that the government
derives their power from the consent of the governed, yet I do not consent. I only operate or
follow orders under duress and threats.
4-B. Under duress, I may choose to comply with the “laws” which others attempt to impose upon
me, but neither such “laws” nor their enforcers have any authority over me. I am not in any
jurisdiction for I am not of subject status.

5. Unless I have willfully harmed or violated someone or someone’s property without their
consent, I have not committed any crime and am, therefore, not subject to any penalty.

6. Thus, be it known to all, I reserve my natural right not to be compelled to perform under any
contract that I did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. Furthermore, I do not

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH ------------------------------- Pg. 1 of 7


accept the liability associated with the compelled and pretended benefit of any hidden or
unrevealed contract or commercial agreement.

7. As such, the hidden or unrevealed contracts that supposedly create obligations to perform for
persons of subject status are inapplicable to me and are null and void. If I have participated in
any of the supposed benefits associated with these hidden contracts, I have done so under duress
for lack of any other practical alternative. I may have received such benefits, but I have not
accepted them in a manner that binds me to anything.

8. Any such participation does not constitute acceptance because of the absence of full disclosure
of any valid offer and voluntary consent without misrepresentation or coercion. Without a valid
voluntary offer and acceptance knowingly entered into by both parties, there is no “meeting of
the minds” and, therefore, no valid contract. Any supposed contract is, therefore, void from the
beginning.

9. From my age of consent to the date affixed below, I have never signed a contract knowingly,
willingly, intelligently, voluntarily, and intentionally whereby I have waived any of my natural
inherent rights, and, as such, take notice that I revoke, cancel, and make void from the beginning
my signature on any and all contracts, agreements, forms, or any instrument which may be
construed in any way to give any agency or department of any government any authority, venue,
or jurisdiction over me.

9-A. Such compelled and supposed benefits include but are not limited to the foregoing list. My
use of such alleged benefits is only under duress and with full reservation of all my natural,
inherent rights. I have waived none of my intrinsic rights and freedoms by my use
thereof. Furthermore, my use of such compelled benefits may be temporary until alternatives
become available, practical, and widely recognized. Typical examples of such compelled and
supposed benefits are:

1. Birth Certificate: The fact that a birth certificate was issued to me by a local hospital or
government agency when I was born is irrelevant to my sovereignty. No status, high or
low, can be assigned to another person through a piece of paper without the recipient’s
full knowledge and consent; therefore, such a piece of paper provides date and place
information only. It indicates nothing about jurisdiction, nothing about property
ownership, nothing about civil rights, and nothing about political and legal status. The
only documents that can have any significance, as it concerns my status in society, are
those which I have signed as an adult with full knowledge and consent, free from
misrepresentation, duress, or coercion of any kind. The issuance of a birth certificate
directly violates the 13th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

When people’s very lives are made into contracted bonds or collateral, it is
internationally recognized as slavery. The numbers displayed on the back of the Social
Security card represent that the said person is property of the Federal Reserve Bank.
Furthermore, the numbers found on the birth certificate also cite a connection with the
Federal Reserve Bank and can be issued as a collateral bank note/Bond (guaranteed by a
person’s ability to pay taxes and/or create credit) which constitutes as another entity

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH ------------------------------- Pg. 2 of 7


having ownership over another human life (i.e., “slavery”). According to Black’s Law
Dictionary, slavery is defined as:
“A person who is wholly subject to the will of another; one who has no freedom of action
but whose person and services are wholly under the control of another.” “One who is
under the power of a master, and who belongs to him ; so that the master may sell and
dispose of his person, of his industry, and of his labor without his being able to do
anything, have anything, or acquire anything but what must belong to his master.” Civ.
Code La. art. 35.

Furthermore, I cannot find any justification for having a birth certificate that is issued and
owned by a bank or corporate entity, nor can I find legal justification that does not violate
the 13th Amendment of the Constitution for the United States to allow for the taxation of
labor or to restrict a business from allowing a man born in the land mass known as the
“United States” from working in his business without a government-issued Social
Security card or government-issued birth certificate. The Social Security Administration
also has no lawful ability to contract with a minor.

2. The use of national currency to discharge my debts: I have used these only because there
is no other widely recognized currency in commerce. For the courts to ask me to pay
them in Federal Reserve Notes is in direct violation of Article I, Section X, Clause I
which states that only gold and silver can be legal tender. For the courts to ask me to pay
with anything other than such is treasonous and against public policy.

3. The use of a bank account: If there is any hidden contract behind an account, my
signature, therewith, gives no validity to it. The signature is only for verification of
identity. I cannot be obligated to fulfill any hidden or unrevealed contract whatsoever due
to the absence of full disclosure and voluntary consent. Likewise, my use of the bank
account is due to the absence of an alternative. To not use any bank at all is very difficult
and impractical.

4. The use of a driver’s license: There is no real need for me to have such a license for
traveling in a car; however, if I am stopped for any reason and found to be without a
“license”, it is likely I would be unduly harassed and penalized. Therefore, under duress,
I carry a “license” only to avoid extreme inconvenience. “Driving” is defined as engaging
in commerce on the highway (i.e., buying and selling such as a taxi service or a delivery
driver); so, if one does not engage in commerce, there is no need for any license to travel
as it would be equivalent to requiring permission to engage in the lawful activity of
traveling as a right secured by the Constitution for the United States of America.
Traveling is not legally defined.

“The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport
his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege
which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he has
under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”
– Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579.

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH ------------------------------- Pg. 3 of 7


5. State-issued license plates on my car: Similarly, if I have registered my car with the state
and carry the license plates on it, I have done so under duress only because to have any
other plates (or no identifying plates at all) causes me to run the risk of police
harassment, imprisonment, and extreme inconvenience. As gasoline taxes pay for the
highways, I have a free right to travel and cannot be charged a fee for something that I
have already paid into.

6. The use of a passport: There is no real need for me to have a passport (or other associated
permits, visas, etc.) to travel. I have the right to travel without hindrance wherever,
however, and whenever I wish so long as I do not encroach upon the private property of
others. Though without a passport, my right to travel is unduly hindered. Therefore,
under duress, I only use a passport to prevent extreme inconvenience and to ensure that I
can travel from one country to another without issue.

7. Past filing of tax returns: Because such tax returns were filed under threat, duress, and
coercion, and no two-way contract was ever signed with full disclosure, there is nothing
in any past filing of tax returns or payments that created any valid contract; therefore, no
obligation on my part was ever created.

“There is a clear distinction in this particular case between an individual and


a corporation, and that the latter has no right to refuse to submit its books
and papers for an examination at the suit of the state. The individual may
stand upon his constitutional rights as a natural person. He is entitled to carry on his
private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no
such duty to the State since he receives nothing therefrom beyond the protection
of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land
long antecedent to the organization of the State and can only be taken from him
by due process of law and in accordance with the constitution. Among his rights are
a refusal to incriminate himself and the immunity of himself and his property from
arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public
so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.”
– Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1905).

8. Past enrollment and voter’s registration: Similarly, since no obligation to perform in any
manner was ever revealed in print as part of the requirements for the supposed privilege
to enroll and vote. Any such enrollment or voting does not oblige me to do anything or
grant any jurisdiction over me to anyone.

9. Citizenship: Any document I may have ever signed in which I answered “yes” to the
question, “Are you a United States citizen?”, cannot be used to compromise my status as
a sovereign or obligate me to perform in any manner. This is because without full written
disclosure of the definition and consequences of such supposed “citizenship” provided in
a document bearing my signature given freely without misrepresentation or coercion,
there can be no binding contract.

I am not a United States citizen. I am not a resident of, an inhabitant of, a franchise of, a

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH ------------------------------- Pg. 4 of 7


subject of, a ward of, the property of, the chattel of, or subject to the jurisdiction of any
monarch or any corporate commonwealth, federal state, territory, county, council, city,
municipal body politic, or other government allegedly created under the authority of a
constitution or other enactment. I am not subject to any legislation, department, or agency
created by such authorities or to the jurisdiction of any employees, officers, or agents
deriving their authority therefrom. None of the statutes or regulations of such authorities
apply to me in my private capacity under equity or have any jurisdiction over me.
Further, I am not a subject of any courts or bound by precedents of any courts deriving
their jurisdiction from said authorities. Take notice that I hereby cancel and make void
from the beginning any such instrument or any presumed election made by any
government or any agency or department thereof and that I am not and never have
voluntarily elected to be treated as a United States citizen subject of any monarch, nor am
I a resident of any commonwealth, state, territory, possession, instrumentality, enclave,
division, district, or province subject to the jurisdiction thereof.

10. Use of semantics: There are some seditious people with criminal intent who masquerade
as government and call the noises and scribbles that emanate from their mouths and pens
“the law” which must be obeyed. Just because they alter definitions of words in their law
dictionaries to their supposed advantage doesn’t mean I accept those definitions. The fact
that they define the words “person”, “address”, “mail”, “resident”, “motor vehicle”,
“driving”, “passenger”, “employee”, “income”, and many others in ways different from
the common usage so as to align and to degrade my political and legal status with a
subject or slave through these linguistic tricks.

Because the courts have become entangled in the game of semantics, be it known to all
courts and all parties that if I have ever signed any document or spoken any words on
record using words defined in any “law” books different from the common usage, there
can be no effect whatsoever on my sovereign status in society thereby nor can there be
created any obligation to perform in any manner by the mere use of such words. Where
the definition in the common dictionary differs from the definition in the “law”
dictionary, it is the definition in the common dictionary that prevails because it is
more trustworthy.

11. My affidavit unrefuted stands as truth. Refer to the following case citations:

“Court of appeals may not assume the truth of allegations in a pleading which are
contradicted by affidavit where affidavits are directly conflicting on material points.
It is not possible for the district judge to weigh the affidavits in order to
resolve disputed issues; except in those rare cases where the facts alleged in
an affidavit are inherently incredible, and can be so characterized solely by
a reading of the affidavit, the district judge has no basis for a determination of
credibility.”
– Data Disc, INC. v. System Tech Assocs., INC., 557 F.2d 1280 (9th Cir. 1977)

“Moreover, Poole’s claim is sufficiently pleaded to satisfy the


pleading requirements in Rule 32.3 and Rule 32.6(b), and his factual allegations

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH ------------------------------- Pg. 5 of 7


were unrefuted by the state; therefore, they must be accepted as true.” See Bates
v. State, 620 So.2d 745. 746 (Ala. Crim. App 1992) (* When the States does not
respond to a petitioner’s allegations, the refuted statement of facts must be taken as
true.), Quoting Smith v. State, 581 So.2d 1283, 1284 (Ala. Crim. App 1991).
“In addition, his claim is not precluded by any of the provisions of rule
32.2.5 because his claim is not barred, is sufficiently pleaded, and is unrefuted by
the state. Poole is entitled to an opportunity to prove his claim.”
– Poole v. State, 988 So. 2d 604 (2007)

12-B. REVOCATION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY


I hereby revoke, rescind, cancel, and make void from the beginning all powers of attorney, in
fact or otherwise, implied in “law” or otherwise, signed either by me or anyone else, as it
pertains to any tax file/identification number and/or social security number assigned to me, as it
pertains to my birth certificate, and as it pertains to any and all other numbers, licenses,
certificates, and other instruments issued by any and all government and quasi-
governmental departments or agencies due to the use of various elements of fraud by said
agencies to attempt to deprive me of my sovereignty and/or property. I do hereby revoke and
rescind all powers of attorney, in fact or otherwise, signed by me or otherwise, implied in law or
otherwise, with or without my consent or knowledge, as it pertains to any and all property, real
or personal, corporeal or incorporeal, obtained in the past, present, or future. I am the sole and
absolute owner and possess allodial title to any and all such property.
I hereby waive, cancel, repudiate, and refuse to knowingly accept any alleged benefit or gratuity
associated with any of the aforementioned numbers, licenses, certificates, and other instruments.
My use of any such numbers, licenses, certificates, or other instruments has been for information
purposes only and does not grant any jurisdiction to anyone.

Take notice that I also revoke, cancel, and make void from the beginning all powers of attorney,
in fact, in presumption, or otherwise, signed either by me or anyone else, claiming to act on my
behalf with or without my consent as such power of attorney pertains to me or any property
owned by me, by, but not limited to, any and all quasi/colorable, public, governmental
departments, agencies, or corporations on the grounds of constructive fraud, concealment, and
non-disclosure of pertinent facts.

EVENT OF DEFAULT

The prosecution / plaintiff hereby has ten (10) days from the recording of this Affidavit to
respond, to rebut, or to deny all of these claims point-for-point. General acquiescence or non-
response after the allotted time frame will constitute formal agreement and acceptance with all of
the aforementioned. The prosecution / plaintiff will have admitted that there is no cause of action
and that no valid claim has been presented upon which relief can be granted.

FURTHER AFFIANT SAITH NOT.

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH ------------------------------- Pg. 6 of 7


ACCEPTANCE
I affirm that all of the foregoing is true and correct. I affirm that I am competent to make this
Affidavit. I hereby affix my own signature to all of the affirmations in this entire document with
explicit reservation of all my inalienable rights and my specific right not to be bound by any
contract or obligation which I have not entered into knowingly, voluntarily, intentionally, and
without misrepresentation, duress, or coercion.

Subscribed and sworn, without prejudice, and with all rights reserved.

Printed Name: ___________________________________


Principal, by Special Appearance, in propria persona, proceeding sui juris.

Autograph of Affiant:___________________________________ Date:_____________


First Middle Last, Attorney in Fact

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The use of a notary below is for identification only and not for entrance into any foreign
jurisdiction.

On this _______ day of________Month________, 2024, before me, the undersigned, a Notary
Public in and for Example County, personally appeared the above-signed, known to me to be the
one whose name is signed on this instrument, and has acknowledged to me that he/she has
executed the same.

Notary Signature: _______________________________________

Notary Name: __________________________________

My commission expires: ________________________________ (seal)

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH ------------------------------- Pg. 7 of 7


AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH ------------------------------- Pg. 8 of 7

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy