Media Fill Investigation Methodology
Media Fill Investigation Methodology
The acceptance criteria for media fill are defined in regulatory guidelines.
As per Guidance for Industry: Sterile Drug Products Produced by Aseptic
Processing – Current Good Manufacturing, published in September 2004,
recommended criteria for assessing state of aseptic line control are as follows:
When filling fewer than 5000 units, no contaminated units should be detected.
One contaminated unit is considered the cause for revalidation, following an
investigation.
When filling from 5,000 to 10,000 units:
✓ One contaminated unit should result in an investigation, including
consideration of a repeat media fill.
✓ Two contaminated units are considered cause for revalidation, following
investigation.
When filling more than 10,000 units:
✓ One contaminated unit should result in an investigation.
✓ Two contaminated units are considered cause for revalidation, following
investigation.
Effective Strategies for Investigating Media Fill Failures in Sterile Facility: By Sachin Kumar Sharma Page 1 of 7
EU GMP Annex 1: Manufacture of Sterile Medicinal Products, section 9.46
mentions that “The target should be zero growth. Any contaminated unit should
result in a failed process simulation and the following actions should occur:
1. An investigation to determine the most probable root causes.
2. Determination and implementation of appropriate corrective measures.
3. A sufficient number of successful, consecutive repeat media fills (normally a
minimum of three) should be conducted in order to demonstrate that the process
has been returned to a state of control.
4. A prompt review of all appropriate records relating to aseptic production since the
last successful APS. The outcome of the review should include a risk assessment of
potential sterile breaches in batches manufactured since the last successful process
simulation. All other batches not released to the market should be included in the
scope of the investigation. Any decision regarding their release status should
consider the investigation outcome.
5. All products that have been manufactured on a line subsequent to a process
simulation failure 2236 should be quarantined until a successful resolution of the
process simulation failure has occurred.
6. Production should resume only after completion of successful revalidation.
Effective Strategies for Investigating Media Fill Failures in Sterile Facility: By Sachin Kumar Sharma Page 2 of 7
Once the activities and time points have been documented, it is crucial to establish
a connection between these activities and any instances of contamination or failures
that may have occurred. By analyzing the records, manufacturers can identify
potential factors that contributed to the failures. Furthermore, it is imperative to
meticulously record every intervention and action taken during the media fill process.
While not mandated by regulatory requirements, video recording can also provide
valuable insights into personnel practices that may have a detrimental impact on the
aseptic process.
When sterilizing the filtration skid, a connection or some part of the skid may not be
sterilized and was not identified or evaluated during qualification.
Aseptic connection is done in a Grade C or Grade B environment instead of Grade A
due to a lack of procedure or operator awareness.
Leakage from filling needle during filling operation that results in the repeated
intervention of filling needle adjustment and cleaning of a spilled product under
Grade A.
Addition of a new item in autoclave load not part of validated load pattern.
Addition of a new connection, new attachment like a dip tube, and inert gas purging
tube in sterilizing filtration skid, which was not part of the validated system.
Sterilized vessels are not maintained under positive pressure throughout the sterile
filling operation, creating a scope of ingress of non-sterile air in sterilized vessels.
Effective Strategies for Investigating Media Fill Failures in Sterile Facility: By Sachin Kumar Sharma Page 3 of 7
Validated sterilization parameters are not incorporated in standard operating
procedures, creating a possibility of using a non-validated sterilization cycle.
The inner surface of a sterile holding vessel has dents, scratches, cracks, and rough
surfaces, which can support microbial proliferation.
Section 9.32 of Annexure-I state that “The Aseptic process simulation should not be
considered as the primary means to validate the aseptic process or aspects of the
aseptic process. The effectiveness of the aseptic process should be determined
through process design, adherence to the pharmaceutical quality system and process
controls, training, and evaluation of monitoring data.”
The measures to be considered as a part of routine operation for sterility assurance
in day-to-day operation as well as during media fill are described in these seven
steps:
1. Well-Defined Procedures for Aseptic Operation:
The operating procedure should elaborate in detail every step for aseptic assembling
and performing aseptic intervention, highlighting precautions to be taken during
critical activities. For example, remove the wrapping of sterilized components using
forceps and avoid direct touching of gloves to sterilized items. Ensuring that the
sterile component is handled only by sterile tools. Do not lean over exposed sterile
components.
2. Operator Training:
First time and refresher training and awareness about basic microbiology to
operators working in an aseptic environment ensures that operators are constantly
made aware of the criticality of aseptic operation. Visual sign boards, videos on
critical aseptic operation, and detailed standard operating procedures (SOPs) with
photographs in SOPs play vital roles in operator skill development.
3. Validation vs. Routine Operation:
The system should be established to ensure that only the validated parameters for
critical operations like sterilization are transferred to standard operating procedures,
and the quality control unit should ensure it. Any changes to validated load patterns,
sterilization-in-place (SIP) skids, and vessels should be done through change control
and should be validated.
4. Inspection of Sterile Holding Vessel and Equipment Assembly:
The condition of the gaskets in the sterile holding vessel is a crucial factor that can
contribute to potential failures. Regular inspection of gaskets used in sterile holding
vessels and SIP skids is necessary to ensure they provide the airtight seal and pass
the leak test (see Figure 1). The inspection should include checking the integrity of
connections, clamps, seals, and view glasses within the sterile holding vessel, filling
Effective Strategies for Investigating Media Fill Failures in Sterile Facility: By Sachin Kumar Sharma Page 4 of 7
machine, and product transfer line. A ruptured, damaged gasket can lead to media
fill failure.
Effective Strategies for Investigating Media Fill Failures in Sterile Facility: By Sachin Kumar Sharma Page 5 of 7
6. Validating Wrapping and Assembly of Filling Equipment
Proper assembly of the filling equipment is crucial to ensure the successful filling of
products into vials, ampoules, or pre-filled syringes (see Figure 3). The sterilization of
the filling assembly should be validated, and transfers from the autoclave to the
filling machine should pass through a mobile laminar airflow unit to prevent
contamination. It is important to validate the wrapping of sterilized items, their
sterilization process, and the transfer process to ensure a continuous laminar airflow
or Grade A air environment is maintained.
Effective Strategies for Investigating Media Fill Failures in Sterile Facility: By Sachin Kumar Sharma Page 6 of 7
CONCLUSION
Effective Strategies for Investigating Media Fill Failures in Sterile Facility: By Sachin Kumar Sharma Page 7 of 7