AAnalyst 800-Micronutrients in Soil by GFAA App Note
AAnalyst 800-Micronutrients in Soil by GFAA App Note
Atomic Absorption
Author
Praveen Sarojam, Ph.D.
PerkinElmer
Global Application Center
Mumbai, India
2
Sample preparation check standard was prepared at the midpoint of calibration
Representative soil samples were collected from three dif- for all elements, from a multi-element ICP grade standard.
ferent locations and were finely ground and then passed The quality control check performed immediately after
through a 20 mesh sieve to obtain very fine particles. 5.0 g calibration and also at the end of analysis was ensured to
of an air-dried, ground and sieved sample was placed in an fall within EPA set limits of 90-110%. The two reference
Erlenmeyer flask and 20 mL of the extracting solution (0.05 N materials from High Purity Standards, river sediment and
HCl + 0.025 N H2SO4) was added to it. Then it was placed in the soil solution were analyzed to validate the method
a magnetic stirrer and the mixture was stirred for 20 minutes. developed. The recoveries from both the solutions were
The resulting solution was filtered through a Whatman® No excellent. Further post-digestion spike recovery studies were
42 filter paper into a 50 mL polypropylene vial and diluted performed for one selected sample for all the nutrients under
to 50 mL with the extracting solution. The analytical reagent study and the results are given in the table. From Table 7
blanks were also prepared and these contained only the one can see the clear difference between the amounts of
acids. The above mentioned procedure is in accordance metal ions recovered by using the two different procedures.
with Mehlich-I extraction. The Mehlich-I extraction gave lower values as expected
which gave indication about the extractable metal ions and
The microwave digestion of soil samples were done in the microwave digestion gave the total metal content in the
accordance with EPA Method 3052. This method is applicable soil samples. The agreement between sample duplicates was
to the microwave assisted acid digestion of siliceous matrices, excellent. If one needs to carry out further characterization
organic matrices and other complex matrices. This method is of soil samples, procedures regarding sample collection and
provided as a rapid multi-element, microwave assisted acid treatment can be modified to suit the recommendations of
digestion prior to analysis protocol so that decisions can be regulatory agencies.
made about the site or material. The goal of this method
is total sample decomposition and, with judicious choice Conclusions
of acid combinations, this is achievable for most matrices.
A method was developed for the sequential determination
Samples of soil were weighed directly into the PTFE-TFM
of essential nutrients in soil by using AAnalyst 800 atomic
digestion vessel liners. Sample weights were approximately
absorption spectrophotometer. Sensitivity and accuracy in
0.1 g. To each sample, 9 mL of concentrated nitric acid
flame AA are directly correlated to the optimization of the
and 3 mL of concentrated hydrofluoric acid were added.
burner position as well as the gas flows. Careful optimization
Some vessels contained only the acids with no sample to
of these parameters, which are different for each element,
act as analytical reagent blanks. The vessels were sealed and
maximizes sensitivity and can significantly reduce or eliminate
placed into the Rotor 8XF100 for the microwave digestion.
interferences. The unique computer-controlled, motorized
After the digestion process, the digestate were transferred
burner system and gas controls allow precise, automated
in to 50 mL polypropylene vials and were made up to 25 mL
adjustments. Since WinLab32 software allows optimized
with ASTM® type I water.
burner position and gas flows to be stored with an element
method, each element in a sequential multi-element run can
Results and discussion be determined using its own optimized parameters. The ability
The Mehlich-I extraction will give an indication about the of PerkinElmer/Anton-Paar Multiwave 3000 microwave
amount of extractable micronutrients in soils. If one needs digestion system to digest the soil samples in accordance
to know the total metal content, complete decomposition of with EPA Method 3052 was demonstrated. The method
samples with a microwave digestion is the preferred choice. detection limits obtained indicates that the reliable analysis
A four point calibration with three standards and one blank of micronutrients in difficult matrices such as soil samples is
was used to calibrate all the micronutrients of interest. The possible with the AAnalyst 800 atomic absorption spectro-
WinLab version 6.5 software has several quality control photometer. The analysis of reference materials and excellent
check options. A minimum correlation coefficient of 0.995 spike recovery results gave further proof to the accuracy of
was assigned in the software for QC check. Quality control the developed method.
3
Table 1. Experimental Conditions of AAnalyst 800.
Element Cu Fe Mn K Na Mg Zn
Wavelength (nm) 324.8 248.3 279.5 766.5 589 285.2 213.9
Slit (nm) 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.7 0.7
Mode AA AA AA AA AA AA AA
Flame Air-Ac Air-Ac Air-Ac Air-Ac Air-Ac Air-Ac Air-Ac
Burner Head 10 cm 10 cm 10 cm 10 cm 10 cm 10 cm 10 cm
Calibration Linear through Linear through Linear through Linear through Linear through Non linear Linear through
zero zero zero zero zero through zero zero
Lamp HCL HCL HCL HCL HCL HCL HCL
Lamp current,
mA 15 30 20 12 8 6 10
Standards
(mg/L) 1.0, 2.5, 5.0 1.0, 2.5, 5.0 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 0.1, 0.25, 0.5
Spiked conc.
(mg/L) 2.5 2.5 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
Read Time
(seconds) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Replicates 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Air Flow (L/min) 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0
Acetylene flow
(L/min) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.3
Table 2. Results of Soil CRM analysis (Lot # 0733733). Table 4. Results of QC Recoveries.
Metal Certified % Recovery % Recovery Metal QC 1 (%) QC 2 (%) QC 1 (%) QC 2 (%)
Value in Solution in Solution Extraction Extraction MDS MDS
(µg/mL) (in HCl and H2SO4) (in HNO3 ) Cu 107.6 100.6 101.1 99.96
Cu 0.30 103.2 104.1 Fe 107.5 106.3 100.1 101.9
Fe 200.0 95.2 96.6 Mg 108 108 100.5 101.5
Mg 70.0 98.1 98.1 Zn 104.3 104.5 103.5 100.8
Zn 1.0 105.7 100.7 Na 100.9 99.96 100.2 98.8
Na 70.0 105.6 98.4 K 99.2 91.4 98.8 97
K 200.0 95.4 95.2 Mn 101 104.9 99.64 96.6
Mn 0.10 103.5 102.7
Table 3. Results of River Sediment CRM Analysis Table 5. Results of Spike Recoveries.
(Lot # 0800230). Metal Spike Recovery (%) Spike Recovery (%)
Metal Certified % Recovery % Recovery for Extracted Sample for Digested Sample
Value in Solution in Solution Cu 108.5 105.1
(µg/mL) (in HCl and H2SO4) (in HNO3 )
Fe 95.8 Conc. too high for spiking
Cu 1.00 102.5 105.8
Mg 97.7 98.8
Fe 1200 102.8 96.4
Zn 102.8 100.4
Mg 70.0 96.9 96.1
Na 106.6 106.5
Zn 15.0 96.0 98.8
K 92.1 96.9
Na 50.0 101.6 93.8
Mn 101.8 97
K 150.0 100.0 98.9
Mn 8.0 96.1 102.8
4
Table 6. Method Detection Limits (MDLs).
Metal MDL (mg/kg)
Cu 0.08
Fe 0.31
Mg 0.009
Zn 0.013
Na 0.02
K 0.02
Mn 0.04
Soil-1 26 257 2124 116305 408 4060 1.1 167 30 1424 379 3833 370 2268
Soil-1 duplicate 27 299 2255 131302 406 3720 1.1 191 37 1722 390 3815 387 2749
Soil-2 23 257 1489 126035 392 2138 1.1 170 35 1162 329 2068 259 2439
Soil-2 duplicate 22 312 1490 135730 383 1802 1.0 198 31 1121 309 1481 249 2640
Soil-3 15 248 418 134645 418 2975 0.3 119 25 562 104 2940 71 1907
Soil-3 duplicate 14 288 374 129465 412 2593 0.3 138 24 587 95 4442 82 2210
PerkinElmer, Inc.
940 Winter Street
Waltham, MA 02451 USA
P: (800) 762-4000 or
(+1) 203-925-4602
www.perkinelmer.com
Copyright ©2009, PerkinElmer, Inc. All rights reserved. PerkinElmer® is a registered trademark of PerkinElmer, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
008875_01