Additives_for_Abrasive_Materials
Additives_for_Abrasive_Materials
74822
Chapter
Provisional 6
chapter
for Abrasive
Additives for Abrasive Materials
Materials
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74822
Abstract
The overarching objective of the chapter is to acquaint the readers with the topic associ-
ated with the production of abrasive tools and presentation of the most significant
research results regarding the determination of the most important functional properties
of selected additives (described in the literature and established on the basis of authors’
own scientific experiences). The studies regarding various additives, which were charac-
terized in detail in the literature, were mainly based on thorough physicochemical and
microstructural analysis as well as the determination of basic strength and thermos-
mechanic parameters. The attempt to implement alternative cross-linking agents, which
would result in the limited release of volatile organic compounds, is also of great impor-
tance in terms of production of environmentally friendly final products. A subsequent aim
is to attract the attention of a wide range of readers and popularize the topic associated
with conventional abrasive materials and next-generation abrasive compositions.
1. Introduction
Modern abrasive tools used in industry are required to fulfill a number of conditions relating
to quality, durability and performance. Progress in a wide range of areas related to materials
engineering has made it possible to use abrasive machining in place of complex specialized
processes. Recent work on the development of abrasive tools has been focused on the search
for functional additives, above all to improve the functional properties of the product through
the addition of fillers that primarily increase adhesion between the grains and binder. Another
key issue is to obtain more environmentally friendly final products by reducing the quantities
© 2016 The Author(s). Licensee InTech. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
© 2018 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative
Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use,
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and eproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
108 Abrasive Technology - Characteristics and Applications
of harmful compounds released, which can be done by using alternative cross-linking agents.
In this chapter, the authors focus above all on the aforementioned questions, describing both
the current state of knowledge and likely directions of future development in these areas.
Abrasive machining is the most popular method of finishing, in which an abrasive tool
(usually in the form of a grinding wheel or disk) rotating at high speed is used to remove the
surface layer of a softer material. In modern industry, grinding technology is constantly being
developed, in line with specific requirements applicable to a wide range of products and
processes. Grinding is a key stage in the technology of production for advanced products and
surface treatment in many fields of industry. The technique has many advantages over other
surfacing methods.
A grinding process can be used for precise operations in the production of high-quality parts,
with high accuracy and small dimensional tolerance [1]. It can be used to produce both very
large machine parts and small objects such as optical instruments, elements of electronic
devices, silicon wafers and rolling bearings. Another invaluable feature is the possibility of
adjusting the abrasive machining process to remove large quantities of material in a short time.
High grinding performance is necessary when it is required to remove a significant quantity of
the machined material in a single fast operation. This applies, for example, in the cleaning of
castings in foundries. Abrasive machining is also a technique used in working with very hard
materials and hardened surfaces. In many cases, it is the only feasible method of finishing the
surface of hard materials. The increasingly popular use of inorganic materials composed of
ceramics and hard minerals with a crystalline structure enables the elimination of problems
related to the finishing of surface layers. Such operations are applied, for instance, in the
aerospace industry.
Figure 1 shows the grinding process in diagram form. Six basic elements may be identified: the
grinding wheel, the worked material, the coolant or cutting fluid, the machine tool, the
surroundings (air) and material chips.
The most important elements playing a role in the process are the abrasive tool and the
processed material. It is their properties that have a decisive impact on the course and effect
of abrasive machining. Parameters of the grinding wheel, such the grain size and type, hard-
ness, rigidity, and physical and chemical properties, determine its suitability for the machining
of a given material. The choice of an appropriate tool is also dependent on the shape, hardness
and physicochemical properties of the worked surface, and it is therefore essential to perform a
full analysis of the material being processed [2, 3]. The process is also influenced by chemical
factors. Atmospheric oxygen and high temperature favor the formation of oxides on the metal
surface, which improves lubrication. Often, however, a coolant or cutting fluid is additionally
used; this draws excess heat from the worked material and the tool, as well as reducing friction
and extending the lifetime of the grinding wheel. Because of the greater stability of a cooled
process, its accuracy can be improved and heat damage can be prevented. The technical
condition of the machine tool is also important. Its purpose is to provide static and dynamic
restriction of displacements between the tool and the worked object. The high quality and
stability of the machine tool are therefore of key importance for achieving the desired tolerance
in terms of geometry, dimensions and roughness. Unwanted vibrations of the machine may
cause cracking and accelerated wear of the abrasive grains [4].
3. Abrasive tools
An abrasive tool is a composite material in which the continuous phase (matrix) consists of a
binder, while the dispersed phase is an abrasive grain. Apart from these two basic compo-
nents, additives are used in the form of fillers—active and inactive—which serve either to
improve the technical parameters (active fillers) or to reduce the production cost of the tool
(inactive fillers). A diagram of the structure of an abrasive tool is shown in Figure 2.
The industrial process of production of abrasive tools with an organic binder comprises three
principal stages: mixing of components, molding, and firing (annealing) to provide cross-
linking of the binder [5, 6].
Figure 2. Simplified diagram of the structure of an abrasive tool, adapted from [2].
110 Abrasive Technology - Characteristics and Applications
The mixing of the components of the tool begins with covering of the surface of the grains with
liquid resin or a solvent (such as furfuryl alcohol). The uniformly moistened grains are then
mixed with powdered resin, with the addition of fillers. The resulting mixture is sieved to
remove lumps or agglomerates. The mixing of the components is a very important process: too
loose a consistency may cause inhomogeneity of the final product, while excessive wetness
will lead to difficulties in further processing.
The next important stage of the preparation of abrasive materials is molding, which may be
hot or cold. Cold molding is applied in the case of tools in which pores account for at least 10%
of the volume, and the pressing time does not usually exceed 1 min. Hot molding is used in the
production of non-porous grinding wheels of high density. In this case, the pressing time is
longer, between 20 and 60 min, and the temperature may be as high as 150 C.
The final process is the firing of the molded prefabricated elements. This is done in industrial
furnaces, according to a strictly defined temperature program. The length of the program
depends on the size of the tool—with larger tools, the increase in temperature should be
slower and the duration of the program as a whole should be longer. In most cases, the cross-
linking process lasts between 18 and 35 h, and the temperature does not exceed 200 C (or
usually 180 C).
4. Abrasive materials
Abrasives are natural or synthetic materials which are used in a highly fragmented state
(usually in the form of grains) as a basic component for the production of abrasive tools.
Synthetic abrasive materials may be obtained by:
• electrothermal melting processes (synthetic corundums);
are boron carbide, silicon carbide, synthetic corundums (standard, noble and modified), dia-
mond (mainly synthetic) and cubic boron nitride. A classification scheme for natural and
synthetic abrasive materials is shown in Figure 3.
Silicon carbide, also known as carborundum, is a compound of carbon and silicon with the
condensed formula SiC, composed of 70.045% silicon and 29.955% carbon. It was the first
abrasive material to be obtained by synthesis. The compound was discovered by the Cowles
brothers in 1885, when they were attempting to melt quartz in an electric arc between carbon
electrodes. It was first produced industrially in 1891 in the United States, by the Carborundum
Company founded by Edward G. Acheson, who was officially recognized as the originator of
the method of production of SiC. Silicon carbide may crystallize either in a hexagonal arrange-
ment (α-SiC) or in a cubic arrangement (β-SiC) [7]. The atoms in the SiC crystal lattice form two
interpenetrating tetrahedral structures. SiC is resistant to the action of molten metals such as
Al, Cu, Pb, Sn, Zn, Cd, although it is sensitive to Fe, Ni, Cr, Co, Mn, since these metals are
capable of forming alloys with SiC. It is not damaged by acidic slags or salts, although damage
Figure 3. Classification scheme for natural and synthetic abrasive materials, based on [4].
112 Abrasive Technology - Characteristics and Applications
is caused by molten alkaline compounds, including certain hydroxides and salts. Sample
reactions with such compounds are given below in Eqs. (1) and (2):
At high temperatures, SiC is able to react with certain oxides (above 800 C), including CuO
and PbO, and with oxides of magnesium and calcium (above 1000 C). Up to 900 C, its stability
is not significantly affected by oxygen, but above that temperature, the surface is fairly
strongly oxidized. The products of this reaction may be compounds such as CO, CO2, SiO
and SiO2. The role of oxidizing agent may also be played by steam or carbon(II) oxide [8].
Silicon carbide has found many applications in various branches of industry. Because of its
high mechanical strength, hardness, and ability to form relatively thick crystals, it is used
chiefly as an abrasive material in abrasive tools. Somewhat less frequently, it is also used to
produce fire-resistant materials such as retorts, crucibles, furnace linings, bricks, and pipes in
heating systems. This is possible because of its very high thermal conductivity, resistance to
sudden temperature changes, and high decomposition temperature. Silicon carbide also offers
high electrical conductivity, and can thus be used in electrical engineering to produce heating
elements, resistors, diodes and transistors [8, 9].
Synthetic corundum is used practically exclusively for the manufacture of abrasive tools. Its
abrasive ability is largely dependent on the quantity of additives. Apart from standard synthetic
corundum, which is produced in the largest quantities, there are also other varieties, such as [11]:
• White alumina—this material contains significantly fewer impurities than standard syn-
thetic corundum. It is generally laid down that noble synthetic corundum should not
contain less than 98.5% aluminum oxide. The principal feature of this material is the
possibility of self-sharpening of the abrasive grains during operation of the tool. Synthetic
corundum grains have slightly lower mechanical strength, and so when the cutting edge
of the crystal becomes blunted it is chipped off the tool, thus uncovering fresh, unblunted
layers. This property is particularly desirable when very accurate working is required and
when the tool is to apply a low pressure on the worked material.
Additives for Abrasive Materials 113
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74822
• titania (Ti2O3)—this modifier produces a material with high abrasive ability and greater
microhardness than white alumina;
• zirconia (ZrO2)—this produces a material with high ductility and mechanical strength.
• Monocorundum—this is a variety of synthetic corundum with greater grain isometry and
smoother faces. It has higher microhardness and mechanical strength than other varieties
of synthetic corundum. Like white alumina, it has self-sharpening capacity. Because of the
lower power of grinding when monocorundum is used, the worked surface heats up to a
lesser degree, and this helps to prevent defects such as cracks and burn.
Diamond is one of the allotropic varieties of carbon, and is unquestionably the hardest mineral
occurring on Earth (with a hardness of 10 on the Mohs scale). Since the quantity of mined
diamond is insufficient to meet supply, leading to very high prices, it has proved necessary to
develop a method for synthesizing diamond. This was achieved for the first time by the
Swedish company ASEA in 1953. Since that time, annual production of artificial diamonds
has been continuously increasing.
Diamond has a density of 3.5 g/cm3. Its crystal lattice has the form of a cube containing 18
carbon atoms [12]. All of the carbon atoms in diamond are joined by high-energy covalent
bonds, which give the material its exceptional hardness. Another important property is its very
good thermal conductivity, which enables heat to be removed efficiently during grinding. It
also has a small thermal expansion coefficient, which reduces thermal deformation of tools
with diamond grains. Another very important feature is anisotropy of hardness and
grindability. These parameters vary not only between different planes, but also depending on
the direction in which the force acts in a given plane. The material is resistant to the action of
very strong acids and their mixtures, but dissolves in molten hydroxides and salts such as
NaNO3 and KNO3. It also dissolves in molten iron and its alloys above a temperature of
approximately 800 C. In the presence of air it combusts at a temperature from 850 to 1000 C.
Synthetic diamonds also have several features that distinguish them from natural diamonds.
They are usually smaller (with an average size between 0.2 and 0.4 mm) and have different
grain shapes and a rougher surface. Surface roughness, and crystal vertices with smaller angles
and smaller radii of curvature are desirable features for abrasive machining. Since the content
of impurities in synthetic diamonds is higher than in natural diamonds, parameters such as
114 Abrasive Technology - Characteristics and Applications
mechanical strength and brittleness are somewhat inferior. Processes for synthesizing dia-
mond are carried out at high pressures (reaching 10 GPa) and high temperatures (up to
3000 C) [13, 14].
Because of its properties, diamond is used successfully for the machining of cemented carbides
and ceramic sinters, for cutting glass panels, for the working of optical glass, and for making
measurements of hardness and smoothness of surfaces.
Cubic boron nitride (borazon) is, like diamond, a member of the group of superhard abrasive
materials. Due to the similarity of the hexagonal form of boron nitride (α-BN) to the structure
of graphite, it was predicted by analogy that the compound must also exist in a diamond-like
form (β-BN). This was proved in 1957 by Robert H. Wentorf, who became the first to success-
fully synthesize cubic boron nitride [15]. Its crystal lattice has a similar structure to diamond.
Of the 18 atoms contained in a cube, four are boron atoms and the remainder nitrogen. Unlike
diamond, in which all bonds are covalent, in cubic boron nitride 75% are covalent bonds and
25% ionic. This fact is significant for the mechanical properties of Borazon: its hardness and
mechanical strength are lower than those of diamond. The material is exceptionally thermally
stable in atmospheric air (up to 2000 C at normal pressure), being transformed back to the
hexagonal form only above 2500 C. However, it is sensitive to the action of water, which at
high temperature causes its decomposition into boric acid (H3BO3) and ammonia. This needs
to be taken into account when selecting a filler whose decomposition products include H2O.
Synthesis of β-BN is carried out in the presence of catalysts (such as metallic potassium) at
pressures of 6.5–9.0 GPa and temperatures of 1500–2000 C [16, 17].
Borazon is not used for the machining of such hard and brittle materials as glass, ceramics and
granite, for which the use of tools based on synthetic diamonds is recommended. Neverthe-
less, it offers excellent performance in the working of tool steels, as well as other metals and
alloys. Tools containing β-BN can produce a ground surface of high quality, thanks to low
grinding power and lower temperatures of abrasive machining.
Conventional abrasive materials that perform well in typical abrasive machining may prove
insufficiently effective in a chemically aggressive environment or when high temperatures and
grinding pressures are used. To improve the functional properties of the abrasive grain and the
tools based on it, one of two routes may be selected—modification of conventional abrasives to
improve their functional parameters, or the development of new methods of producing
superhard materials (or improvement of existing methods) with the aim of reducing costs.
Conventional abrasive materials are usually subjected to thermal or thermal-chemical
processing, although more and more research is being done into the surface modification of
abrasive grains.
Thermal processing is among the oldest and most popular methods of modifying raw abrasive
grains. It enables reduction of the brittleness of grains, particularly those of synthetic corundum,
by means of roasting at temperatures up to 2000 C. This results in the creation on the grain
Additives for Abrasive Materials 115
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74822
surface of a fine crystalline structure, which increases its operational durability and the stability
of its machining properties. Roasting is carried out to eliminate undesirable impurities: sodium
and potassium 11-aluminates, described as β-Al2O3. The presence of aluminates in the grain may
also reduce the mechanical strength of a single grain by as much as 30%. As a result of thermal
processing, β-Al2O3 corundums in the form K2O11Al2O3 transform completely into α-Al2O3 at a
temperature of around 1520 C, while Na2O11Al2O3 transforms at 1700 C. The roasting temper-
ature may be reduced to 1300 C if gaseous hydrogen is used [18].
Abrasive grains are also modified to reduce the adverse impact of water-based coolants, which
usually shorten the tool’s lifetime. The reason for the reduced durability is the tendency of
resins to crack under the influence of water, causing the grains to become loose and fall out. A
way of preventing this may be to cover the grains with a layer of modifier containing hydro-
philic and/or hydrophobic components. Hydrophilic components used include silanes
containing amine, ureide, isocyanide, acetoxy and chloride groups. Hydrophobic silanes con-
tain mainly phenyl, vinyl, methacrylic or epoxide groups. Surface modification using a dual-
component silane-based modifier brings several undoubted benefits. The hydrophilic compo-
nent covers the entire surface well, at the same time facilitating its moistening. The hydropho-
bic component may be applied together with the first component or as a separate layer,
demonstrating the ability to bond with both the covered grains and the resin binder. Such
modification prevents water-based coolants from penetrating to the interior of the tool, and
thereby extends the tool lifetime, improves the material removal rate (MRR) and enhances the
overall quality of the finished surface [19].
The development of innovative abrasives involves not only the modification of conventional
materials but also the creation of new methods for producing superhard materials
(superabrasives). The production of such materials, primarily synthetic diamond and cubic
boron nitride, originally required high temperatures and very high pressures. To convert
graphite to diamond, a pressure of around 13 GPa and a temperature of 3000 C are required.
In view of the difficulty of providing such extreme conditions, other methods are used, such as
solvent catalyst synthesis. This method makes it possible to reduce the high activation energy
and the required pressure and temperature by a half [20]. The catalysts used in the process
dissolve graphite, enabling the carbon atoms to move and to adopt the positions appropriate
to diamond. Commonly used metal catalysts include nickel, iron and cobalt, as well as rho-
dium, palladium, platinum and others [21]. Diamond may also be obtained using non-metal
catalysts, such as hydroxides and carbonate salts [22].
liquid diffusion method with methanol as a source of carbon, carried out in an argon atmo-
sphere under microwave energy. This method can produce a film with a diamond content of
approximately 75%, while reducing the risk associated with the use of explosive gases such as
hydrogen and methane [33].
Another interesting study concerns the obtaining of single-phase nano-polycrystalline dia-
monds using direct conversion from graphite under high temperature and ultra-high pressure.
This product offers very high mechanical strength, and does not exhibit anisotropy of its
mechanical properties. Moreover, such a material does not require any additional binders,
and this fact also has a positive effect on its thermal stability [34].
5. Binders
In terms of quantity, the binder is the second most significant component of an abrasive tool. It
serves as a continuous phase that binds the single grains into a compact, strong composite.
Abrasive composites may be based on organic binders (such as rubber, organic resins and
polyurethanes) or inorganic binders (ceramics, magnesite, sintered and galvanic metals). Inor-
ganic bonds with glass-like or vitreous structures are mostly used in grinding wheels with fine
grain sizes for precision operations, while resin-bonded tools are applied in heavy metal
removal processes. Ceramic and resin binders are the most commonly used types. Ceramic
binders are thermally and chemically resistant and also ensure the repeatability of grinding
processes. Disadvantages include their brittleness and the need to apply very high tempera-
tures when making tools from them. Technologies for producing ceramic abrasive tools are
being constantly improved. A recently introduced technology is used to obtain tools bonded
with Vitrium 3 [35], which enables a smaller quantity of binder to be used, increasing the tool’s
Additives for Abrasive Materials 117
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74822
performance and also making it more porous, which enables better cooling and thus less
likelihood of burning of the machined surface. Ceramic binders are used to bond superhard
abrasives such as diamond and cBN. For corundum abrasives, the less expensive resin binders
are more often used. These are produced with the consumption of much less energy than in the
case of ceramic binders: the semi-finished product is heated at 200 C, compared with 1200 C
for ceramic binders. Resin binders also offer high strength and elasticity, and give the abrasive
tool good properties for polishing the ground surface. Grinding wheels with resin binders are
used primarily for the cutting of materials and for rough grinding operations at high machin-
ing speeds (45–100 m/s).
A disadvantage of binders of this type is their sensitivity to the action of coolants containing bases,
and to high temperature. Resin binders are most commonly based on phenol formaldehyde resins.
Phenolic resins, also called phenoplasts, have a range of properties that enable them to be used
in a fairly wide range of applications. They are formed by a polycondensation reaction of
phenols with formaldehyde. There are two distinct types of phenol formaldehyde resins:
novolacs and resoles. The processes by which they are obtained are depicted in Figure 5. They
differ in terms of the molar ratios of reactants and the environment in which the reaction takes
place. Hardening is also carried out by a different method in each case: resole is heat-hardened,
whereas novolac is a thermoplastic and must be hardened using a cross-linking agent—most
commonly hexamethylenetetramine (urotropine), with the further addition of HCHO (usually
in the form of paraformaldehyde).
Due to the harmful properties of formaldehyde and of the ammonia emitted when novolac is
cross-linked using urotropine, new hardening agents are being sought (although up to date
urotropine is still the cross-linking agent most commonly used in industry). By means of
modification of novolac, for example by the introduction of epoxide and amine groups [36], it
is possible to obtain resins with lower levels of emission of low-molecular-weight compounds
and resulting binders with greater strength and chemical and thermal resistance.
Figure 5. Reactions leading to phenol formaldehyde resins in novolac and resole form, adapted from [5].
118 Abrasive Technology - Characteristics and Applications
There has been increasing interest in recent years in the use of natural raw materials to produce
phenolic resins [37, 38]. However, there is still only a limited number of reports on industrial
applications of abrasives containing phenolic resins based on natural materials such as lignin,
which currently represents a new trend in the abrasive tools industry [39]. There would
therefore appear to be a need for continued intensive research to achieve further improve-
ments in this area, related to elimination of the existing defects of binders based on resins with
the partial use of phenols of natural origin. These defects include the low reactivity of deriva-
tives of phenol from natural sources, processing problems with abrasive articles made using
them, and the inferior mechanical properties compared with tools based on traditional pheno-
lic resins. Lignin-based resins have already been successfully used in certain demanding
applications, including brake blocks [40].
A very interesting alternative to binders based on phenolic resins are benzoxazine resins.
These products have a wide range of mechanical and physical properties that can be tailored
to various needs. Their main advantage is the absence of emissions of low-molecular-weight
compounds during their cross-linking. There is also no need to add cross-linking agents. It is
also noteworthy that they are produced using phenol and its derivatives, which provides the
possibility of alternative use of products of natural origin. However, it was only in 2016 that
benzoxazine resins were first synthesized from lignin [41]. This area of research thus remains
ripe for development.
6. Fillers
Fillers are used as an auxiliary materials in the production of abrasive tools. They are
usually inorganic compounds that demonstrate affinity toward both the abrasive grains
and the binder holding the grains together in the substance of the tool [42]. There are
several kinds of fillers, and they can be classified according to the mechanism of their action
(see Table 1) [43].
I The first mechanism involves thermal decomposition of the filler, which leads to the emission of low-
molecular-weight products (such as H2O, HF or HCl). These reactions are endothermic, which means
that the tool can operate at a lower temperature
II In the second mechanism, the action of the filler results from its reaction with the worked surface,
which causes corrosion of freshly removed fragments of metal. This prevents the chips from reacting
with the abrasive and fusing back onto the worked object
III The third mechanism is explained by the melting of the auxiliary material due to the heat produced by
grinding, which leads to reduced friction (self-lubrication of the tool) and thus allows the tool to
operate at a lower temperature
IV In the final mechanism, fillers react with the machined surface. The reaction causes cracks to appear
on the metal surface, making machining easier
• they protect the abrasive grains from the harmful atmosphere existing in the furnace
during firing;
• they prevent thermal degradation of the resin on the contact surface between grain and
binder;
• they cool the tool while it is operating.
Fillers are added to abrasive composites for several reasons. Most commonly, they serve
merely to reduce the production cost of the tool, through the addition of an inactive filler,
usually soot, cooper slag or iron oxide. It is preferable, however, to use active fillers, which
serve above all to draw heat from the process, as a result of which they undergo thermal
decomposition and prevent melting of the resin binder [44, 45]. Conventional active fillers
have certain drawbacks, the chief of which is the emission of harmful gases due to their
decomposition. Popular fillers such as pyrite (FeS2) and lithopone (ZnS + BaSO4) emit sulfur
when they decompose, while potassium fluoroborate (KBF4), cryolite (Na3AlF6) and potas-
sium hexafluoroaluminate (K3AlF6) emit fluorine and its compounds. Hence, at the present
time, fillers are being sought that will combine desirable properties with limited adverse
impact on the environment. The division into active and inactive fillers is shown in Figure 6.
It is worth mentioning that aluminosilicates such as natural zeolite have been successfully used
as functional and ecological fillers [46, 47]. This is a cheap and environmentally friendly raw
material, which also has a favorable effect on the thermomechanical properties of prototypical
resin composites used in the production of bonded abrasive tools [48]. Moreover, zeolites may
accelerate the cross-linking of phenol resins [48]. Since they retain a large quantity of water in
their structure [49], they should not be used for superhard abrasive tools based on cBN; since
at the high working temperature of such a tool and in the presence of water emitted by the
zeolites, decomposition of cBN may occur.
An interesting raw material that may be used as a filler is lignin, which offers many advan-
tages—it is of natural origin, it is renewable, and it is produced in large quantities as a by-
product of the process of delignification of wood [50]. Unfortunately, due to its characteristic
structure, lignin in raw state is not able to provide the required properties [51]. Its properties
can be improved in two ways. One is the activation of raw lignin via its oxidation, which
enables the formation of new, more active functional groups capable of reacting with the resin
binder [52]. Another way to improve the thermal stability of lignin preparations is to combine
them with appropriate inorganic oxides, so as to form an organic-inorganic hybrid material
[53]. Addition of these innovative materials makes it possible, above all, to improve the
mechanical strength and thermal stability of the final abrasive composite.
The search for new, functional fillers, which increasingly often are hybrid materials, is intensi-
fying at the present time. The primary goal is to produce systems with improved properties,
having a decisive impact on the abrasive tool that is the final product. The combination of
organic polymers or biopolymers with inorganic oxides makes it possible to obtain modern
additives with previously unencountered properties. Another important factor is the cost
associated with the production of abrasive materials. These can be kept relatively low by using
waste products for this purpose, including wastes of natural origin.
7. Conclusions
Abrasive technology has been developed for centuries, but there still exists a wide range of
opportunities for its continued improvement. In view of the development of manufacturing
industry and the dynamic state of the global economy, modern abrasive tools are becoming
subject to ever more rigorous requirements as regards quality, performance, durability, cost,
and impact on the environment. Future development will involve further work on each of the
main components of abrasive composites, as all of these have a significant effect on the
functional properties of the final product. Present trends indicate that the search will continue
for new, cost-effective ways of obtaining polycrystalline abrasive materials on the nanoscale,
with previously unobtainable strength properties. Attempts will also no doubt be made to
modify the surface of grains with organic compounds to produce on the surface functional
groups capable of reacting with the groups present in resin binders. The development of
binders, in turn, will be focused on reducing their toxicity by limiting the quantities of com-
pounds emitted during the manufacture and operation of tools, while at the same time
improving their mechanical properties. An excellent alternative to traditional resin binders
would appear to be benzoxazine resins, which offer very interesting physicochemical param-
eters, low toxicity and wide possibilities of molecular design. It is equally important to seek
new functional fillers for abrasive tools, especially organic-inorganic hybrid materials. This
Additives for Abrasive Materials 121
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74822
vision is particularly attractive in view of the possibility of producing and using many differ-
ent systems combining inorganic oxides with natural polymers, which in many respects
appears to be an innovative and beneficial solution. In short, the further development of
abrasive composites will be driven by the concept of sustainable development, involving the
improvement of functional properties while at the same time caring for the environment.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Science Centre Poland under research project no.
UMO-2017/25/N/ST8/00401 and PUT research grant no. 03/32/DSPB/0806.
Conflict of interest
Author details
References
[1] Malkin S, Guo C. Grinding Technology: Theory and Application of Machining with
Abrasives. 2nd ed. New York: Industrial Press Inc.; 2008. ISBN-13: 978-0831132477
[2] Marinescu ID, Hitchiner M, Uhlmann E, Rowe WB, Inasaki I. Handbook of Machining
with Grinding Wheels. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016. ISBN: 9781482206685
[3] Bhushan B. Modern Tribology Handbook. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2000. ISBN: 978084938
4035
[4] Jackson MJ, Davim JP. Machining with Abrasives. New York: Springer; 2011. ISBN: 978-
1-4419-7302-3
[5] Gardziella A, Pilato LA, Knop A. Phenolic Resins: Chemistry, Applications, Standardiza-
tion, Safety and Ecology. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2000. ISBN: 978-3-662-04101-7
122 Abrasive Technology - Characteristics and Applications
[6] Jacobs FB. Abrasives and Abrasive Wheels, Their Nature, Manufacture and Use: A Com-
plete Treatise on the Manufacture and Practical Use of Abrasives, Abrasive Wheels and
Grinding Operations. London: Forgotten Books; 2017. ISBN-13: 978-0331571110
[7] Harris GL. Properties of Silicon Carbide. London: Inst of Engineering & Technology;
1995. ISBN-13: 978-0863415548
[8] Jayant Baliga B. Silicon Carbide Power Devices. London: World Scientific Pub. Co. Inc.;
2006. ISBN-13: 978-9812566058
[9] Yang D, Yu Y, Zhao X, Song Y, Lopez-Honorato E, Xiao P, Lai D. Fabrication of silicon
carbide (SiC) coatings from pyrolysis of polycarbosilane/aluminum. Journal of Inorganic
and Organometallic Polymers. 2011;21:534-540. DOI: 10.1007/s10904-011-9481-y
[10] Wellborn W. Modern abrasive recipes. Cutting Tool Engineering. 1994;4:42-47
[11] Linke B. Life Cycle and Sustainability of Abrasive Tools. Cham: Springer International
Publishing; 2016. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28346-3
[12] Field JE. The Properties of Diamond. London, New York: Academic Press; 1979. ISBN:
0122553500 9780122553509
[13] Field JE. Diamond—Properties and Definitions. Cambridge: Cavendish Laboratory; 1983
[14] Zaitsev AM. Optical Properties of Diamond—A Data Handbook. Berlin Heidelberg:
Springer-Verlag; 2001. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-04548-0
[15] Bello I. Diamond and Cubic boron nitride: Synthesis and electronic applications. In: Pro-
ceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Advanced Semiconductor Devices
and Microsystem “ASDAM ‘0200 ; 14–16 October 2002; Smolnice Castle, Slovakia: IEEE;
2002, p. 1-11
[16] Hitchiner MP, Wilks J. Some remarks on the chemical wear of diamond and CBN during
turning and grinding. Wear. 1987;114:327-338. DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(87)90120-7
[17] Bello I, Chong YM, Leung KM, Chan CY, Ma KL, Zhang WJ, Lee ST, Layyous A. Cubic
boron nitride films for industrial applications. Diamond and Related Materials. 2005;14:
1784-1790. DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2005.09.003
[18] Souza Santos P, Souza Santos H, Toledo SP. Standard transition aluminas. Electron micros-
copy studies. Materials Research. 2000;3:104-114. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-14392000000400003
[19] US Patent US 80214492011
[20] Davies G. Charge states of the vacancy in diamond. Nature. 1977;269:498-500. DOI:
10.1038/269498a0
[21] Wakatsuki M. New catalysts for synthesis of diamond. Japanese Journal of Applied
Physics. 1966;5:337-340. DOI: 10.1143/JJAP.5.337
[22] Akaishi M. New non metallic catalysts for the synthesis of high pressure, high tempera-
ture diamond. Diamond and Related Materials. 1993;2:183-189. DOI: 10.1016/0925-9635
(93)90050-C
Additives for Abrasive Materials 123
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74822
[23] Tong SL, Lin Z, Jiang X. CVD diamond films: Nucleation and growth. Materials Science &
Engineering R: Reports. 1999;25:123-154. DOI: 10.1016/S0927-796X(99)00003-0
[24] Das D, Singh RN. A review of nucleation, growth and low temperature synthesis of
diamond thin films. International Materials Review. 2007;52:29-64. DOI: 10.1179/174328007
X160245
[25] Kamo M, Sato Y, Matsumoto S, Setaka N. Diamond synthesis from gas phase by decom-
position of methane in microwave plasma. Journal of Crystal Growth. 1983;62:642-644.
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0248(83)90411-6
[26] Kurihara K, Sasaki M, Kawanda M, Koshino N. High rate of synthesis of diamond by dc
plasma jet chemical vapour deposition. Applied Physics Letters. 1988;52:437-438. DOI:
10.1063/1.99435
[27] Akatsuka F, Hirose Y, Komaki K. Rapid growth of diamond films using arc discharge
technique. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 1988;27:L1600-L1602. DOI: 10.1143/
JJAP.27.L1600
[28] Snail KA, Freitas JA, Vold CL, Hanssen LM. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International
Symposium on Diamond Materials; May 1991; Washington, USA. Electrochemical Soci-
ety; 1991. p. 91
[29] Snail KA, Vold CL, Marks CM, Freitas JA. High temperature epitaxy of diamond in
turbulent flame. Diamond and Related Materials. 1992;1:180-186. DOI: 10.1016/0925-
9635(92)90021-F
[30] Lin CR, Liao WH, Wei DH. Improvement on the synthesis technique of ultranano-
crystalline diamond films by using microwave plasma jet chemical vapor deposition.
Journal of Crystal Growth. 2011;326:212-217. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2011.01.100
[31] Vaitkuviene A, McDonald M, Vahidpour F. Impact of differently modified nanocrystal-
line diamond on the growth of neuroblastoma cells. New Biotechnology. 2015;32:7-12.
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2014.06.008
[32] Vikharev AL, Gorbachev AM, Kozlov AV. Microcrystalline diamond growth in presence
of argon in millimeter-wave plasma-assisted CVD reactor. Diamond and Related Mate-
rials. 2008;17:1055-1061. DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2008.01.050
[33] Yang L, Jiang C, Guo S, Zhang L, Gao J, Peng J, Hu T, Wang L. Novel diamond films
synthesis strategy: Methanol and argon atmosphere by microwave plasma CVD method
without hydrogen. Nanoscale Research Letters. 2016;11:415-420. DOI: 10.1186/s11671-
016-1628-x
[34] Sumiza H. Novel development of high-pressure synthetic diamonds “ultra-hard nano-
polycrystalline diamonds”. SEI Technical Review. 2012;74:15-22
[35] Vitrium3—White Paper [Internet]. 2016. Available from: http://www.saint-gobain-abra-
sives.com/en-us/resources/expertise/vitrium3-white-paper [Accessed: 2018-01-24]
[36] EPON™ Resin 160 produced by HexionTM, Technical Data Sheet [Internet]. Available
from: http://www.hexion.com/en-US/product/epon-resin-160 [Accessed: 2018-01-13]
124 Abrasive Technology - Characteristics and Applications
[37] Yoshida C, Okabe K, Yao T, Shiraishi N, Oya A. Preparation of carbon fibers from
biomass-based phenol-formaldehyde resin. Journal of Materials Science. 2005;40:335-339.
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-005-6087-1
[38] Srivastava R, Srivastava D. Studies on the synthesis and curing of thermosetting novolac
resin using renewable resource material. International Journal of ChemTech Research.
2013;5:2575-2581
[39] Pilato LA. Phenolic Resins: A Century of Progress. Berlin: Springer; 2010. ISBN: 978-3-
642-04714-5
[40] Silveira JVW, Bittencourt E, Aguila ZJ. Thermal and dynamic investigations on brake pad
composites produced with lignin-phenolformaldehyde resin. Materials Science Forum.
2013;730–732:390-394. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.730-732.390
[41] Abarro GJ, Saake B, Lehnen R, Podschun J, Ishida H. Benzoxazines with enhanced
thermal stability from phenolated organosolv lignin. RSC Advances. 2016;6:107689-
107698. DOI: 10.1039/C6RA22334F
[42] Wypych G. Handbook of Fillers. 4th ed. Toronto: ChemTec Publishing; 2016 978-1-
895198-91-1
[43] European Patent EP 2177318
[44] Jurga J, Voelkel A, Strzemiecka B. Application of different analytical methods used in the
study of the cross-linking of resins in intermediate-product used in manufacturing of
abrasive articles. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2009;112:3305-3312. DOI: 10.1002/
app.29840
[45] Laza JM, Alonso J, Vilas JL, Rodríguez M, León LM, Gondra K. Influence of fillers on the
properties of a phenolic resin cured in acidic medium. Journal of Applied Polymer
Science. 2008;108:387-392. DOI: 10.1002/app.26816
[46] Strzemiecka B, Heberger K, Voelkel A. Similarity and grouping of perlite and zeolite
abrasive fillers: A replacement test. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2013;127:3839-
3847. DOI: 10.1002/app.37695
[50] Biermann CJ. Handbook of Pulping and Papermaking. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press;
1996. ISBN: 978-0-12-097362-0
[51] El Mansouri N-E, Pizzi A, Salvado J. Lignin-based wood panel adhesives without form-
aldehyde. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff. 2007;65:65-70. DOI: 10.1007/s00107-006-0130-z
[52] Klapiszewski Ł, Jamrozik A, Strzemiecka B, Matykiewicz D, Voelkel A, Jesionowski T.
Activation of magnesium lignosulfonate and kraft lignin: Influence on the properties of
phenolic resin-based composites for potential applications in abrasive materials. Interna-
tional Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017;18:1224-1243. DOI: 10.3390/ijms18061224
[53] Klapiszewski Ł, Jamrozik A, Strzemiecka B, Borek B, Matykiewicz D, Voelkel A, Koltsov
I, Jesionowski T. Characteristics of multifunctional, eco-friendly lignin-Al2O3 hybrid
fillers and their influence on the properties of composites for abrasive tools. Molecules.
2017;22:1920-1939. DOI: 10.3390/molecules22111920