Session 2
Session 2
Exercise #1
The success of a project to build a new product depends on the
performance features of the product.
The development effort for this new product can be directed in any of
three possible directions: strategies A, B & C, each of which will result in a
product with different performance features.
One of the following three future states of nature will exist when the
product development effort ends:
N1 represents no competing products in the market,
N2 represents a competing product that may come anytime between 0-
6 months, and
N3 represents a competing product in the market.
2
Back
Exercise #1…
The payoff table given below gives the likely profits in lakhs of rupees.
State of nature
Strategy N1 N2 N3
A 60 30 -20
B 60 50 60
C 90 70 40
3
Decision making under risk
• When there are several possible states of nature and the probabilities
associated with each possible state are known
The most popular method – choose the alternative with the highest
Expected Monetary Value (EMV)
where
𝑋𝑖𝑗 = Payoff for the alternative 𝑖 𝐴𝑖 in state of nature 𝑗
𝑃(𝑋𝑖𝑗 ) = Probability of achieving payoff 𝑋𝑖𝑗 (i.e., probability of the state of nature 𝑖)
∑ = summation symbol
4
EMV for Thompson Lumber
State of nature
Do nothing 0 0
State of nature
Favorable Unfavorable
Alternative market ($) market ($) EMV ($)
Do nothing 0 0 0
6
Sensitivity analysis
Define P = probability of a favorable market
300,000
9
EVPI and EVwPI
• EVPI (Expected Value of Perfect Information) places an upper bound
on what you should pay for additional information.
Favorable Unfavorable
Alternative market ($) market ($) EMV ($)
Do nothing 0 0 0
So, the maximum Thompson Lumber should pay for this perfect information is $ 18,000.
11
Alternative approach: EOL
• EOL (Expected Opportunity Loss) is the cost of not picking the best
solution.
• Steps:
1. Construct an opportunity loss table.
2. For each alternative, multiply the opportunity loss by the probability of that
loss for each possible outcome and add these together.
3. Minimum EOL will always result in the same decision as maximum EMV.
4. Minimum EOL will always equal EVPI.
12
Alternative approach: EOL…
State of nature
Favorable market Unfavorable market
Alternative ($) ($) EMV ($)
State of nature
Favorable market Unfavorable market
Alternative ($) ($) EOL ($)
Opportunity Construct a large plant 0 180,000 18,000
loss table
Construct a small plant 100,000 20,000 92,000
Do nothing 200,000 0 180,000
Probabilities 0.90 0.10
13
Why?
To Prove:
Minimum EOL will always result in the same decision as maximum EMV.
To Prove:
Minimum EOL will always equal EVPI.
14
Decision trees
• Any problem that can be presented in a decision table can be
graphically represented in a decision tree.
• Components:
decision points/nodes
state-of-nature points/nodes
16
Steps of decision tree analysis
Favorable market
Construct
2
small plant Unfavorable market
18
Exercise #4
EMV = 88,000
19
Thank you!
Questions/Comments?
20