Republic of the Philippines

Region VIII
EASTERN VISAYAS STATE UNIVERSITY
Salazar St, Downtown, Tacloban City, Leyte

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)

Astronomo,Shane L. Sabinada, Dianne S.

Boleche, Aice O. Sobrino, Angielyn M.

Elesis, Elma C. Potente, Lance Ashley G.
Oquiño,Christine Joy
BSED SCIENCE 2 A
(GROUP 8)
ABSTRACT

This report provides a comprehensive overview of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA),

examining its principles, methodologies, and practical applications. We analyze the EIA process from
initial scoping and baseline data collection to impact prediction, mitigation planning, and post-project
monitoring. The report critically assesses the strengths and limitations of current EIA practices,
highlighting challenges such as the complexity of predicting long-term ecological and social impacts,
ensuring stakeholder engagement, and enforcing mitigation measures. Case studies illustrate the diverse
applications of EIA across various development sectors, showcasing both successful implementations and
instances where improvements are needed. Finally, the report explores emerging trends and future
directions for EIA, including the integration of climate change considerations, advancements in predictive
modeling, and the role of technology in enhancing data collection and analysis. The findings underscore the
crucial role of EIA in promoting sustainable development by fostering informed decision-making and
minimizing the environmental footprint of human activities.

ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………………………….. i
TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………………………………………………….. ii
INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………. 1
EIA PROCESS AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK………………………………………...1-5
DATA REQUIREMENTS FOR EIA…………………………………………………………….5-8
ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS AND METRICS………………………………………….8-11
RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT…………………………………………………..11-14
CASE STUDY AND PRACTICAL APPLICATION…………………………………………….14-16
CONCLUSION……………………………………………………………………………………16
REFERENCE……………………………………………………………………………………...17

ii
INTRODUCTION

An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a process used to identify, predict, evaluate, and

mitigate the biophysical, social, and other relevant effects of development proposals prior to major

decisions being taken and commitments made. In simpler terms, it's a systematic way of examining what

the environmental consequences of a planned project might be before that project begins. This helps

decision-makers understand the potential positive and negative impacts on the environment and surrounding

communities, allowing for informed choices and mitigation strategies to minimize harm. EIAs are often

legally required for large-scale projects like dams, highways, mines, and industrial facilities.

EIA PROCESS

key stages of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process. Let's break down each stage in

detail:

Screening: This initial step determines whether a project requires a full EIA. It involves evaluating

the project's potential environmental impacts based on predefined criteria. Projects with minimal

anticipated impact may be exempt, while those with significant potential for environmental harm will

proceed to the next stage. The screening process often involves checklists, screening matrices, or thresholds

based on project size, location, and type.

Scoping: Once a project is identified as requiring an EIA, the scoping phase defines the specific

environmental issues to be addressed in the assessment. This involves identifying the key environmental

components affected (e.g., air, water, soil, biodiversity, cultural heritage), the geographical area of influence,

and the relevant stakeholders. Public consultation is often a crucial part of scoping, ensuring that the

assessment considers the concerns and perspectives of local communities and other interested parties. The

outcome of scoping is a clear statement of the assessment's scope and objectives.

１
 Impact Prediction: This stage involves predicting the likely environmental consequences of the

project. This requires detailed analysis of potential impacts on various environmental components,

considering both direct and indirect effects, short-term and long-term implications, and cumulative effects

in conjunction with other existing or planned projects. Various techniques are used, including

environmental modeling, impact matrices, and expert judgment. Predictions should be supported by robust

data and methodology.

Mitigation and Management: Based on the impact predictions, this stage develops strategies to

avoid, minimize, or compensate for negative environmental impacts. Mitigation measures may involve

changes to the project design, implementation of pollution control technologies, habitat restoration, or

compensation for loss of ecological resources. A management plan should outline the implementation and

monitoring of these measures.

Reporting: The EIA report summarizes the findings of the previous stages. It presents a

comprehensive overview of the project, its potential environmental impacts, the proposed mitigation

measures, and the overall assessment of the project's environmental acceptability. The report follows a

standardized format, often dictated by regulatory guidelines, and includes detailed technical information,

maps, and visual aids.

Review: The EIA report is subjected to a formal review process. This may involve internal review

by the project proponent, external review by independent experts, and public review and comment. The

review process identifies any deficiencies in the assessment, ensuring the quality and completeness of the

information provided. The review may lead to revisions in the assessment.

Decision-Making: Based on the reviewed EIA report, a decision is made regarding whether to

approve or reject the project. This decision considers the environmental impacts, mitigation measures, and

the overall balance between the project's benefits and its environmental costs. Decision-making authorities

２
are responsible for ensuring that the decision is environmentally sound and in accordance with relevant

regulations.

Monitoring and Follow-Up: After project approval, monitoring is implemented to track the actual

environmental impacts and the effectiveness of the mitigation measures. This involves collecting data on

relevant environmental parameters and comparing these with the predictions made in the EIA. If significant

unexpected impacts occur, corrective actions may be necessary. Follow-up activities may include periodic

reporting and audits to ensure compliance with environmental regulations and the project's environmental

management plan.

This detailed explanation clarifies each stage of the EIA process, highlighting the importance of

comprehensive assessment, mitigation, and ongoing monitoring for responsible environmental management.

REGULATORY FRAME WORK

Regulatory Framework for Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs). This framework ensures

that EIAs are conducted consistently, effectively, and in accordance with established legal and procedural

standards. Let's examine each component in detail:

International Laws and Conventions: These form the foundational layer of the regulatory

framework. Many international agreements and treaties address environmental protection and sustainable

development. Examples include

 The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD): This treaty promotes the conservation of

biological diversity, sustainable use of its components, and the fair and equitable sharing of the

benefits arising from the utilization of genetic resources. It influences EIA requirements by

emphasizing the consideration of biodiversity impacts in project assessments

 The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC): This convention aims

３
 to stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere to prevent dangerous anthropogenic

interference with the climate system. EIAs must now increasingly incorporate climate change

considerations, including greenhouse gas emissions assessments and adaptation strategies.

 Other relevant conventions: Numerous other international agreements address specific

environmental issues, such as the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, the Convention on

International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), and various conventions related to pollution

control. These conventions influence national EIA regulations by setting international standards

and best practices.

National Laws and Regulations: Each country has its own set of national laws and regulations

governing EIAs. These laws define the legal requirements for conducting EIAs, specifying the types of

projects requiring assessment, the procedures to be followed, and the responsibilities of different

stakeholders. These national regulations often incorporate and implement the principles outlined in relevant

international conventions. The specifics vary considerably between countries, reflecting different

environmental priorities and administrative systems.

Guidelines and Standards: In addition to laws and regulations, many countries develop detailed

guidelines and standards to provide further clarity and guidance on conducting EIAs. These guidelines

often cover specific aspects of the EIA process, such as impact assessment methodologies, data collection

techniques, reporting requirements, and public consultation procedures. These guidelines aim to ensure

consistency and quality in EIA practice.

Regulatory Agencies: Government agencies are responsible for overseeing the EIA process,

ensuring compliance with regulations, and reviewing EIA reports. These agencies may have different

mandates and responsibilities, depending on the country and the specific environmental issues involved.

Their roles include:

４
  Screening and scoping: Determining which projects require EIAs and defining the scope of
assessment.

 Reviewing EIA reports: Assessing the quality and adequacy of EIA reports.

 Enforcing regulations: Ensuring compliance with EIA regulations and taking action against non-
compliance.

 Public consultation: Facilitating public participation in the EIA process.

Public Participation: Public participation is a crucial component of the regulatory framework. It

ensures that the concerns and perspectives of affected communities and other stakeholders are considered in
the EIA process. Public participation may involve various mechanisms, such as public hearings,
consultations, and opportunities for submitting comments on EIA reports. This promotes transparency and
accountability and helps to ensure that EIAs are socially and environmentally responsible.

In conclusion, the regulatory framework for EIAs is a multi-layered system that integrates

international agreements, national laws, technical guidelines, regulatory agencies, and public participation

to ensure that development projects are environmentally sound and sustainable. The effectiveness of this

framework depends on the clarity and stringency of regulations, the capacity of regulatory agencies, and the

level of public engagement.

DATA REQUIREMENTS FOR EIA

Data Requirements for EIA. We need to expand on what data is required for a comprehensive EIA.

The specific data needs will vary depending on the type of project, its location, and the potential

environmental impacts. However, some common data categories are:

Project Description:

 Project details: A comprehensive description of the proposed project, including its purpose, location,

size, and timeline. This should include maps, diagrams, and other visual aids illustrating the project's

spatial extent and infrastructure.

５
 Project activities: A detailed breakdown of all project activities, including construction, operation, and

decommissioning phases. This should specify the methods, materials, and equipment to be used.

 Alternatives considered: A description of alternative project designs or locations that were

considered and the reasons for selecting the proposed option. This demonstrates that the project's

design minimizes environmental impacts.

Baseline Environmental Data:

This section describes the existing environmental conditions before the project begins. It forms the

basis for comparing pre- and post-project conditions to assess the project’s impacts. Data needs include:

 Air quality: Measurements of air pollutants (e.g., particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen oxides) at the

project site and surrounding areas.

 Water quality: Analysis of water quality parameters (e.g., pH, dissolved oxygen, nutrients, heavy

metals) in surface and groundwater sources.

 Soil conditions: Assessment of soil properties (e.g., texture, organic matter content, nutrient levels,

contamination) at the project site.

 Biodiversity: Surveys of flora and fauna, including species composition, habitat types, and population

sizes. This often requires specialized ecological expertise.

 Noise levels: Measurements of ambient noise levels at the project site and surrounding areas.

 Socio-economic data: Information on the local human population, including demographics,

livelihoods, and cultural heritage. This is crucial for assessing social impacts.

Impact Prediction Data:

This section uses the baseline data and project information to predict the potential environmental

６
impacts. This may involve:

 Environmental modeling: Using computer models to simulate the effects of the project on air, water,

or other environmental components.

 Impact matrices: Tables that systematically assess the potential impacts of various project activities

on different environmental factors.

 Expert judgment: Using the knowledge and experience of environmental specialists to predict

impacts.

Mitigation and Management Data:

This section describes the measures to reduce or eliminate negative impacts:

 Mitigation measures: Detailed descriptions of the methods to be used to avoid, minimize, or

compensate for negative impacts.

 Management plan: A plan outlining the implementation and monitoring of mitigation measures. This

includes responsibilities, timelines, and budgets.

Monitoring Data:

This section outlines the plan for monitoring environmental impacts during and after project

completion:

 Monitoring program: A detailed plan specifying the parameters to be monitored, the methods to

be used, and the frequency of monitoring.

 Data collection and analysis: Procedures for collecting, analyzing, and reporting monitoring

data.

The quality and completeness of this data are crucial for a reliable and credible EIA. Insufficient or

７
inaccurate data can lead to flawed impact predictions and inadequate mitigation strategies. The data should

be collected using appropriate methods, analyzed using robust techniques, and presented clearly and

transparently in the EIA report. The specific data requirements will be defined by national and international

regulations and guidelines, as well as the project's specific characteristics.

ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS AND METRICS

Environmental Indicators and Metrics. This topic is central to Environmental Impact Assessments

(EIAs) and broader environmental management. A report on this subject would cover the following:

Defining Indicators and Metrics:

 Indicators: These are qualitative or quantitative variables that reflect the state of the

environment or the impacts of human activities. They provide a simplified representation of

complex environmental systems, allowing for monitoring and evaluation of environmental

conditions. Examples include biodiversity indices, air quality indices, and water quality

parameters. Indicators often provide a summary of a more complex situation.

 Metrics: These are specific, measurable values or quantities used to quantify indicators. They

provide a numerical measure of the indicator, allowing for comparison across different locations,

time periods, or projects. Examples include species richness (number of species in a given area),

concentration of pollutants in air or water, or hectares of forest cover. Metrics are the numerical

values that give substance to indicators.

Types of Environmental Indicators and Metrics:

A wide range of indicators and metrics are used to assess environmental impacts, depending on the

specific context and the environmental aspects being considered. Some common categories include:

 Biodiversity indicators: These assess the health and diversity of ecosystems, including

８
 species richness, abundance, evenness, and habitat quality.

 Air quality indicators: These measure the levels of various pollutants in the atmosphere, such as

particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur dioxide.

 Water quality indicators: These assess the chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of

water bodies, including pH, dissolved oxygen, nutrient levels, and the presence of pathogens.

 Soil quality indicators: These measure the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil,

including organic matter content, nutrient levels, and soil erosion rates.

 Climate change indicators: These track changes in greenhouse gas concentrations, temperature,

precipitation, and sea level.

 Resource depletion indicators: These measure the consumption of natural resources, such as water,

minerals, and timber.

 Waste generation indicators: These track the amount of waste generated by human activities,

including municipal solid waste, industrial waste, and hazardous waste.

 Social indicators: These measure the social impacts of environmental changes or projects,

including human health, livelihoods, and cultural heritage.

Selection of Appropriate Indicators and Metrics:

The choice of indicators and metrics for a specific EIA or environmental assessment depends on

several factors:

 Project type and location: The type of project and its location will determine the relevant

environmental aspects to be considered.

 Regulatory requirements: National and international regulations may specify the indicators and

９
 metrics to be used.

 Data availability: The availability of data will influence the choice of indicators and metrics.

 Scientific validity: The indicators and metrics should be scientifically valid and reliable.

Data Collection and Analysis:

The collection and analysis of data for environmental indicators and metrics are essential for

accurate assessment. This involves:

 Data collection methods: Appropriate methods for collecting data on the chosen indicators and

metrics, including field surveys, remote sensing, laboratory analysis, and statistical modeling.

 Data quality control: Procedures to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the collected data.

 Data analysis techniques: Statistical and other analytical techniques to interpret the collected data and

assess environmental impacts.

Reporting and Interpretation:

The results of the data analysis should be clearly presented in the EIA report, including:

 Maps and graphs: Visual representations of the data to facilitate understanding.

 Statistical analysis: Summary statistics and other relevant statistical analyses to quantify the

environmental impacts.

 Interpretation of results: A discussion of the implications of the findings, including their relevance

to the project's environmental acceptability.

In summary, environmental indicators and metrics are essential tools for assessing and managing

environmental impacts. The careful selection, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data are crucial for

ensuring the reliability and credibility of environmental assessments. The specific indicators and metrics
１０
used will vary depending on the context, but the principles of scientific rigor and transparency should

always guide the process.

RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT

Risk Assessment and Management in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). Environmental

Impact Assessments (EIAs) aim to identify and mitigate potential environmental consequences of projects.

However, inherent uncertainties and complexities mean that risks are always present. Effective risk

assessment and management are crucial for ensuring the reliability and credibility of EIAs and for making

informed decisions about project development. This section would define risk in the context of EIAs and

explain why risk assessment and management are necessary.

Risk Assessment in EIA:

This section would detail the process of identifying and evaluating potential risks associated with a

project. This involves:

 Identifying potential risks: This involves systematically identifying all potential environmental risks

associated with the project's different phases (planning, construction, operation, decommissioning).

Techniques like brainstorming, checklists, and hazard identification matrices are used.

 Analyzing risk likelihood and consequence: For each identified risk, the likelihood of occurrence

and the potential consequences (severity) are assessed. This often involves qualitative judgments based

on expert knowledge and available data. Quantitative methods, such as probabilistic risk assessment,

may also be used where appropriate data are available.

 Prioritizing risks: Risks are prioritized based on their likelihood and consequences. High-priority

risks require more attention and resources for mitigation.

Risk Management in EIA:

１１
 This section would discuss how to address the identified risks:

 Risk mitigation: Strategies to reduce the likelihood or consequences of identified risks. This may

involve changes to project design, implementation of pollution control technologies, or development of

contingency plans.

 Risk transfer: Shifting the risk to another party, such as an insurance company.

 Risk acceptance: Accepting the risk if the consequences are deemed acceptable.

 Risk monitoring: Continuous monitoring of risks throughout the project lifecycle to detect emerging

risks or changes in existing risks.

Methods and Techniques for Risk Assessment and Management in EIA:

This section would describe various methods and techniques used for risk assessment and

management in EIAs:

 Qualitative risk assessment: Using expert judgment and experience to assess risk likelihood and

consequences.

 Quantitative risk assessment: Using numerical data and statistical methods to assess risk.

 Checklists and matrices: Structured tools for identifying and evaluating risks.

 Scenario planning: Developing different scenarios to assess potential impacts under various

conditions.

 Decision trees: Graphical representations of decision-making processes under uncertainty.

 Cost-benefit analysis: Comparing the costs of risk mitigation with the potential benefits of avoiding

negative impacts.

Integration of Risk Assessment and Management into the EIA Process:

１２
 This section would discuss how risk assessment and management should be integrated into the

various stages of the EIA process:

 Screening: Identifying high-risk projects that require more detailed EIA.

 Scoping: Defining the scope of the risk assessment.

 Impact assessment: Predicting potential impacts and assessing associated risks.

 Mitigation and management: Developing risk mitigation strategies.

 Monitoring and review: Tracking risks and evaluating the effectiveness of mitigation measures.

Case Studies

Illustrative examples of successful and unsuccessful risk assessment and management in EIAs.

Conclusion

Effective risk assessment and management are essential for ensuring the environmental soundness

and sustainability of development projects. Integrating these processes into EIAs helps to identify and

manage potential risks, leading to better environmental outcomes.

This report would provide a comprehensive overview of risk assessment and management in the

context of EIAs, offering practical guidance for practitioners and decision-makers. The specific methods

and techniques used would depend on the context of the EIA, but the underlying principles of identifying,

evaluating, and managing risks remain consistent.

CASE STUDY AND PRACTICAL APPLICATION

Case Studies and Practical Applications. This topic would involve presenting real-world examples

of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) and demonstrating how the EIA process is applied in practice.

The report should include the following:

１３
 This section would introduce the importance of case studies in understanding the practical

application of EIAs. It would explain how case studies can illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of

different EIA methodologies and provide insights into best practices. It would also highlight the value of

learning from both successful and unsuccessful EIA applications.

Selection Criteria for Case Studies:

This section would discuss the criteria used to select the case studies presented in the report. This might

include factors such as:

 Project type: The type of project (e.g., infrastructure, industrial, energy) to ensure a diverse range

of examples.

 Geographic location: The location of the project to reflect different environmental contexts and

regulatory frameworks.

 EIA methodology: The specific EIA methodology used to illustrate different approaches.

 Outcome: The outcome of the EIA process (e.g., project approval, rejection, modifications) to

showcase diverse results.

Case Study Presentations:

This is the core of the report, presenting several case studies. Each case study should include:

 Project description: A brief description of the project, including its location, purpose, and scale.

 Environmental setting: A description of the relevant environmental characteristics of the project

area.

 EIA process: A summary of the EIA process followed, including the methodologies used, data

１４
 collected, and stakeholders involved.

 Key findings: The key findings of the EIA, including the predicted environmental impacts and

mitigation measures.

 Outcome and lessons learned: The outcome of the EIA process (project approval, rejection, or

modification) and the lessons learned from the experience. This is critical for informing future

EIA practice.

 Successes and failures: Highlighting what worked well and what could have been improved in the

EIA process.

Practical Applications:

This section would discuss the practical implications of the case studies, drawing general lessons

and best practices. It might include:

 Methodological considerations: Discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of different EIA

methodologies based on the case studies.

 Stakeholder engagement: Analysis of the effectiveness of stakeholder engagement in the different

case studies.

 Mitigation measures: Evaluation of the effectiveness of different mitigation measures.

 Regulatory aspects: Analysis of the role of regulatory frameworks in shaping EIA outcomes.

Conclusion:

This section would summarize the key findings from the case studies and their implications for

improving EIA practice. It would provide recommendations for future EIA processes, emphasizing the

importance of learning from past experiences.

１５
 The report should be well-structured, clearly written, and supported by relevant data and evidence

from the case studies. The selection of case studies is crucial for ensuring the report's relevance and impact.

A focus on both successful and unsuccessful EIAs will provide a balanced and informative perspective on

the practical application of EIA methodologies. The report should be accessible to a broad audience,

including EIA practitioners, policymakers, and other stakeholders.

CONCLUSION

Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) are like a careful check-up before starting a big project

that could affect nature. They help us see what might happen to the environment – the air, water, plants,

and animals – if we build a new road, factory, or dam. This check-up uses information gathered from

experts and the public to predict problems and find ways to fix them before they happen.

EIAs work best when everyone is involved. The people planning the project, government officials,

scientists, and local communities all need to share information and ideas. This helps make sure the

assessment is fair and considers everyone's concerns. The better the information we have, the better the

prediction of what might happen to the environment.

Even with a good EIA, there are always some things we can't predict perfectly. Nature is

complicated! That's why it's important to keep watching what happens after a project starts. If new

problems pop up, we can adjust and make things better.

In the end, EIAs are a helpful way to make sure we build things without causing too much harm to

the environment. They're not perfect, but by using good science, clear communication, and careful planning,

we can protect nature while still making progress. The more we learn from past EIAs, the better we can do

them in the future.

１６
REFERENCE

Philippine Environmental Impact Statement System emb.gov.ph 2021

https://emb.gov.ph/uploads/2021/03/...

Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide (ELAW) Information about EIA legal frameworks, specifically

mentioning Sri Lanka's National Environmental Act No. 47 of 1980 (as amended 1988 & 2000).

https://elaw.org/eia-legalframework

Environmental Indicators and Metrics

http://pdf.wri.org/environmentalindicators_bw.pdf

Risk Assessment and management

https://www.coastalwiki.org/wiki/References_for_environmental_risk_assessment

Case Study and Practical Application

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S01

１７
１８