Module Name Executive Leadership and Governance

Student Reference Number BP0275031

(SRN)

Assessment Title Coca Cola’s Leadership and risk management Report

Declaration of Original Work:

I hereby declare that I have read and understood BPP’s regulations on plagiarism and that this is my
original work, researched, undertaken, completed, and submitted in accordance with the requirements of
BPP School of Business and Technology.

The word count, excluding contents table, bibliography and appendices, is 4985 words.

Student Reference Number: BP0275031 Date: 11/03/

2024

1
Contents
Part A: Board Review Report Extracts...................................................................................................3
1. Organisational Culture and the Role of the Board........................................................................3
 Introduction to Coca-Cola's leadership style and organizational culture............................3
 Description of the main duties and responsibilities of the board..............................................4
2. Corporate Governance........................................................................................................................4
 Explanation of Coca-Cola's Corporate Governance framework..........................................4
3. Regulatory Landscape and Management of Risk..........................................................................6
 Analysis of the regulatory landscape and its impact on Coca-Cola......................................7
 Identification and analysis of at least three risks faced by Coca-Cola.................................7
 Recommendations for managing identified risks...................................................................8
Part B: Leadership Report...................................................................................................................10
Task 1 - Leadership and Management..................................................................................................10
 Comparison of Coca-Cola's leadership style with a competitor.........................................10
 Evaluation of Coca-Cola's ability to handle future business challenges.............................11
Task 2 - Leadership for Performance....................................................................................................11
 Creation of a Balanced Scorecard for Coca-Cola with Strategic Objectives and Key
Performance Indicators...................................................................................................................12
 Explanation of how "Leadership for Performance" approaches can help achieve objectives
13
 Critical evaluation of recent quarterly financial statements and performance.................13
Task 3 - Ethical Leadership....................................................................................................................14
 Critical evaluation of significant ethical issues faced by Coca-Cola...................................14
 Recommendations for managing identified ethical issues effectively.................................15
References.........................................................................................................................................17

2
Part A: Board Review Report Extracts
1. Organisational Culture and the Role of the Board
 Introduction to Coca-Cola's leadership style and organizational culture
Coca-Cola has a tradition oriented organizational culture, which focuses on teamwork, creativity,
and high performance. This culture defining and sustaining role is fulfilled by leadership across
various regional offices and bottling partners of a multi-national corporation. Leadership in
Coca-Cola is rather participatory than authoritarian. Subordinates are actively involved in the
decision-making process with their leaders. Besides, there is the emphasis on the development of
the leaders within the organization by means of numerous training and mentorship programs.
This ensures that the culture is maintained where the home-grown talent starts to assume the
upper management (Twekambe, 2019). Nevertheless, Coca-Cola does complement its internal
leadership pipelines with strategic outside hires as needed to bring in critical new skills and
approaches. The company is proud of being a learning organization. Over $2 billion is invested
in training annually in order to perpetually upskill the workforce. Leadership creates a norm that
everyone should keep learning to provide ideas that can drive innovations. This leads to a
dynamic culture that is focused on experimentation, innovative problem-solving, and flexible
adaptation to changing consumer demands and market situation. The Board of Directors is an
essential governance function for Coca-Cola. Though day-to-day leadership is done by the CEO
and his executive team, the Board takes an oversight role of the corporate strategy, ensures that
the major decisions are made, and that appropriate risk management is done (Ibrahim & Daniel,

2019).

3
 (www.tuko.co.ke/266477-who-owner-coca-cola-today)
The board heavily focuses on diversity to inject the thoughts from a broader variety of
stakeholders into the company’s top-level directions. On the whole, Coca-Cola’s long period of
success suggests that it has a well-entrenched organizational culture and multi-layered hierarchy
which puts it in a good place for future market leadership. Although Coca-Cola’s organizational
culture and leadership style have driven past success, the company meets big modern challenges.
Currently, the consumer orientation is moving from sugary sodas to a pop-up healthy alternatives
i.e. flavored seltzer waters. Coca-Cola should capitalize on its culture of innovation and
teamwork to come up with new offerings that suit current customer needs. Simultaneously, terms
like sustainability and ethical behavior are becoming more and more significant, especially for
young generations. Coca-Cola requires leadership that can deliver sustainable and quantifiable
improvements across environmental and social dimensions, alongside profits (Maisoni et al.,
2019). Competing with small, agile beverage start-ups will involve speeding up decentralized
decisions and allowing regional teams to continuously test and learn. In addition, managing a
globally dispersed workforce requires sophisticated remote collaboration technologies and
innovative change management practices. By maintaining the core cultural strengths and
developing these particular areas, Coca-Cola can regrow its consumer appeal and market
leadership in a fast-changing environment.
 Description of the main duties and responsibilities of the board
The board of directors plays a pivotal role in shaping and overseeing the organisational culture of
a company. The main duties and responsibilities of the Coca-Cola board relating to
organisational culture include:
 Setting the tone at the top - The board sets the ethical tone for the organization and has
oversight of senior management to ensure that they are aligned with the company’s
values and desired culture. Integrity, quality, transparency and accountability are core
values of organisational culture that the board members must represent (Wee et al., 2023).
 Establishing governance policies and frameworks - Policies, codes of conduct and
governance frameworks are established by the board which makes sure that these policies
enable expected behaviours derived from organizational culture and values. This involves
steps to avoid and correct ethical violations (Ally, 2022).
 Selecting and evaluating the CEO - Selecting and evaluating the CEO is important
because the CEO drives culture. The leadership style, intrinsic values, and the capability
of acting as a role model for the desired culture should be evaluated by the board.
Continuous CEO assessments allow adjustments to reframe behaviors (Appie et al.,
2020).
 Providing oversight on culture Measurement - The board must demand regular reporting
on tangible culture metrics like employee surveys, retention rates, whistleblowing

4
 incidents and policy breaches. Trends provide insight into the strength of the current
culture.
 Driving culture change when necessary - The board plays a lead role in initiating
purposeful culture change during significant events like scandals or leadership
transitions. This requires diagnosing current versus optimal culture, creating a vision for
change and ensuring the senior team executes on transforming behaviours.
In summary, the Coca-Cola board shapes organisational culture through its oversight of
leadership, governance policies, metrics-based monitoring and spearheading of cultural
transformations when the need arises. It sets the tone from the top down.

2. Corporate Governance
 Explanation of Coca-Cola's Corporate Governance framework
Coca-Cola's Board of Directors oversees strong corporate governance. The Board includes 11
directors, 10 of whom are independent, ensuring supervision and preventing conflicts. The CEO
and Board Chairman functions are distinct, fostering accountability. The Board has five
important committees: Audit, Compensation, Directors and Corporate Governance, Executive,
Public Issues, and Diversity Review. The Audit Committee manages financial reporting, risk,
compliance, and internal controls (van Eyck & Steenkamp, 2021). Performance and shareholder
interests guide the remuneration Committee's executive remuneration programmes. The
Directors and Corporate Governance Committee recruits Board members and creates corporate
governance guidelines. When timing is crucial, the Executive Committee represents the Board.
The Public Issues and Diversity Review Committee aids CSR and diversity efforts. Coca-Cola
has robust risk oversight. The whole Board and key committees examine cybersecurity, climate
change, marketplace dynamics, and macroeconomic factors. The CEO and leadership team
execute enterprise risk management (Wood et al., 2020). Ethics & Compliance manages policies,
training, and monitoring. The company's Codes of Business Conduct for workers, officers, and
the Board promote ethical behaviour. Supplemental Board and CEO/CFO codes address conflicts
of interest and transparency. Transaction/relationship conflicts require directors to recuse
themselves. We have strict anti-bribery and insider trading practices (KURA, 2019). Coca-Cola's
corporate governance values honesty, openness, and shareholder rights. A qualified, impartial
Board can oversee corporate operations and risk management using the framework.

5
 (Source: Ismail et al, 2017)
 Critical evaluation of the remuneration committee's role
The pay committee is crucial to setting executive compensation in line with firm
performance and shareholder interests. In recent years, Coca-Cola's compensation
committee has been criticised for excessive CEO pay unrelated to performance.
Fortunately, Coca-Cola's compensation committee is entirely independent, providing
outside insight on pay choices. The committee hires an independent compensation
consulting company for programme design and peer benchmarking (Onyusheva, 2019). It
follows excellent governance procedures such executive stock ownership guidelines. The
committee might increase Coca-Cola's CEO salary in various areas. Coca-Cola
executives are paid substantially above median, with the CEO's total salary in the top
15% of big corporations. But Coca-Cola's overall shareholder return has underperformed
the S&P 500 for five years, putting into question its high remuneration. The committee
should tighten performance-pay connections, including relative TSR, to align CEO
incentives with shareholders. Second, short-term compensation schemes focus on
earnings per share rather than revenue growth or market share increases, which are more
important for long-term health. Even when the stock price is low, long-term equity
awards frequently exceed the objective. Committee-reviewed executive pay plan goals
and vesting timelines. Finally, opponents say executive compensation decisions are
opaque. The compensation report excludes pay decision and goal reasons (Umit, 2021).
Clearer information would assist shareholders assess the committee's rigour. To
conclude, Coca-Cola's compensation committee follows sound governance procedures,
although disclosure might improve pay-for-performance and transparency. Answering
these questions would reassure shareholders about the decision-making process.

6
3. Regulatory Landscape and Management of Risk
 Evaluation of the Board's responsibility for risk management
The board of directors is important in risk management of Coca-Cola. As a result, the board is
responsible for making sure that suitable risk management policies and procedure are in place to
protect the interests of shareholders. An efficient risk management framework involves
identifying critical risks across the organization, estimating the possibility and potential impact
of those risks and designing mitigation measures. In Coca-Cola, the Board Audit Committee
directly supervises the risk management function (Huse et al., 2022). The Audit Committee
assesses the sufficiency and suitability of the internal controls, which are designed to minimize
risks such as financial reporting misstatements or fraud. The board is also the watchdog that
keeps an eye on strategic risks such as changes in consumer preference while making sure that
the right strategies are being followed. An assessment reveals that Coca-Cola has a well-
established risk management framework. Risks are categorized in groups such as financial,
strategic, operational and so on and on quarterly basis. Controlled, insurance or business
continuity planning are the mitigation plans. Though, the emerging risk as cybersecurity and
sustainability still have some opportunities for improvement (Leong, 2019). With the growth of
stakeholder activism on ESG issues, the board should intensify its control of sustainability
initiatives and associated risks. On the whole, the board of Coca-Cola is active and well-
informed of the major risks that the company may encounter. The processes are well defined
creating visibility and monitoring of risks. Integration of risk metrics into strategic decisions
represents another process which can assist in the further reinforcement of risk consciousness in
culture and operations. A dedicated Risk Committee can also be set up by the board for detailed
evaluation.

 Analysis of the regulatory landscape and its impact on Coca-Cola

Coca-Cola operates in a complex regulatory environment where there are laws and regulations at
different levels- federal, state, and local jurisdictions. Main areas of regulation are in food and
beverage manufacturing, labeling and advertising, environmental impacts, workplace safety, and
others. Every product launch is subject to a range of laws and regulations; for instance, Coca
Cola should comply with Applied FDA regulations of ingredient safety and labelling accuracy
and FTC standards of truthful advertising (Khaing, 2019). Environmental regulations concerning
water usage and plastic bottle/can recycling significantly affect the operations and financial
performance. With growing concerns over obesity and chronic diseases worldwide, Coca-Cola is
under increased attention and policy measures to control soda consumption through taxation and
limitations on sizes. Coca-Cola is presented with both risks and opportunities by this intricate
regulatory canvas. In the risk side, compliance with a whole range of laws and regulations in
different markets demands a lot in resources, time and capital investment. Violations can as well

7
lead to defamation, litigations, and penalties. Nevertheless, by adopting a proactive stance of
regulatory compliance and stakeholder engagement, Coca-Cola can influence policy-making to
its benefit. The company has a lot of power and it does lot of lobbying on the issues like
recycling standards and soda tax proposals (Xiao & Zhang, 2020). Coca-Cola re-formulates
products to capture a trend of consumer health and uses self-regulatory initiatives as a PR tool.
Despite this the regulation climate only grows more intense, particularly for a company so
deeply associated with public health reasons. Coca-Cola needs to remain flexible in its corporate
strategy to handle regulatory risk and look for possibilities of policy leadership and regulatory
collaboration. This competence will determine the profitability and social license to operate for
years to come.

 Identification and analysis of at least three risks faced by Coca-Cola

Modern regulatory and competitive landscape present Coca-Cola with several core risks. One big
threat is the health & safety laws associated with the sugary drinks. As the world becomes more
concerned about obesity and other health problems caused by sugar intake, Coke is subjected to
more and more scrutiny and consideration of soda taxes or other actions to reduce sugar intake
(Guo & Wen, 2021). This can have a significant effect on the sales and profitability if new taxes
or regulation were widely implemented. The other major risk is water consumption and waste,
particularly in the water-stressed areas, where company’s production facilities are situated.
However, in a context in which water is becoming a critical source, the reputation of Coca-Cola
may be harmed and operation may be disturbed in case the company is seen as the abuser of
local water supplies. A stricter control on the use of safe water and wastewater discharge may
have a cost impact too. Lastly, being a transnational corporation, Coca-Cola also faces both
exchange rate risks and political instability in the foreign markets (Maisoni et al., 2019).
Unexpected revaluations of currency or political instability in key markets can severely impact
the profitability and supply chains. Geopolitical risk management should be made proactive, and
currency hedging is necessary for the smoothing out of global profits in the face of fx volatility.
These risks call for aligned efforts in government relations management, lower-sugar and smaller
formats product mix adjustment, community participation with water utilization, supply chain
variability, and strategic financial planning. Utilizing a multidimensional approach in risk
management, Coca-Cola can foster a responsible business practices while safeguarding
shareholder value.

 Recommendations for managing identified risks

In order to keep pace with changing consumer preferences as well as health standards, the
product range of Coca-Cola should be diversified further, in particular with reduced sugar,
organic, and functional beverages. R&D investments will facilitate innovation in line with new

8
needs - for example, plant-based packaging materials. Further, the cross-functional teams should
be kept abreast of changes in the global regulatory environment so that they respond swiftly to
new demands. In turn, adoption of strong risk management practices that systematically scan,
assess and monitor risks will add to organizational resilience (Khan & Raza, 2023). Policies and
training that should ensure legal and ethical compliance and the company has to maintain open
lines of communication with the lawmakers to offer positive input on regulations. Using
technologies such as AI can help to complement human supervision in identifying risks and
guiding data-based mitigation approaches. Continuity planning by crisis preparation can help to
lessen disruptions when unexpected events happen. Continuous stakeholder involvement offers
insights to changing concerns. Consumer surveys, partnerships with NGOs on critical issues and
linkages with academic institutions may guide Coca-Cola in the understanding of social
expectations and regulator agendas. Communicating ingredient transparency, nutrition initiatives,
and sustainability programs shows responsiveness to these issues (Chu, 2020).
Organisational agility, resilience, and proactive stakeholder trust-building will help Coca-Cola
adapt to regulatory risk. Innovation, regulatory understanding, legal compliance, and cooperation
should be prioritised. As Coca-Cola innovates products and operations, it should also establish
an ethical, responsible, and sustainable culture. Leadership must communicate values and
required legal compliance, health and safety vigilance, environmental stewardship, and
community participation. Training and performance incentives should reinforce priorities
(Brondoni, 2019). Leaders should also model the needed mentality and behaviour. To properly
incorporate conscientiousness across all levels, employees must realise that the organization's
success is not just dependent on financial returns but also on winning society's confidence,
therefore it must be open and ethical in its business activities. Coca-Cola should view regulatory
pressures as consumer and society demands for corporate accountability rather than negative
restraints. Coca-Cola can develop stakeholder loyalty and reputation equity by setting industry
standards for ethics and social impact. The company's development should balance business
deadlines with social considerations (Chiu et al., 2019).

Part B: Leadership Report

Task 1 - Leadership and Management

 Critical evaluation of Coca-Cola's leadership and management style using relevant
models
Coca-Cola employs an eclectic mix of leadership styles which include elements of
transformational, transactional, and situational leadership paradigms. Transformative leadership
is seen through Coca-Cola’s focus on encouraging employees to come up with new ideas.
Leaders share a healthy and sustainable vision that will help to align the organization.
Nevertheless, the company fails to complete the transformational change. Where leaders trigger
creativity, there are layers of such bureaucracy. Transactional leadership within Coca-Cola is

9
centralized, and top managers aim at establishing clearly defined goals and objectives to enhance
performance. The system of rewards and punishments is quite strong when it comes to
achievement of set targets. This leadership approach maintains uniformity and standardization
throughout the huge multinational company. Nevertheless, it may also limit flexibility in the
local markets. Coca-Cola also demonstrates some situational leadership behaviors that include
changing leadership styles depending on follower’s development level (Singaram et al., 2019).
Such as, recently hired workers may need a more directive leadership, while elderly workers are
given free rein and support. However, the bureaucracy is too thick to allow the leaders to be
flexible. The possibility for growth lies in enabling the frontline leaders to diagnose the situation
and adapt their style. Generally, Coca-Cola is more centered towards centralized, transactional
leadership and has some components of transformational and situational leadership (Huse et al.,
2022). The balance between motivation and discipline is perfect. Localization and perniciousness
could lead to innovation and change. Eliminating bureaucratic barriers is also likely to lead to a
more adaptive, situational leadership.

 Comparison of Coca-Cola's leadership style with a competitor

Coca-Cola and PepsiCo have been rivals in the beverage industry for a long time. Both firms
have dissimilar leadership styles and approaches that have affected their performance. Coca-Cola
has preferred the centralized type of leadership, where most decision-making is more top-down
in its approach. The CEO and top management have been the source of strategic decisions. This
has provided Coca-Cola to have an integrated brand image and strategy (Karam, 2021). Yet, it
has also led to the company’s slower response to market changes. There is more red tape before
decisions are made. This style of leadership is strong in terms of the consistency but weak in the
flexibility and creativeness. On the other hand, PepsiCo used to practice more decentralized
leadership. Regional and local managers are granted more powers. The CEO and the top leaders
still determine the general vision and course, but the lower levels have more freedom of action to
use local ideas and trends. This enables managers to instantaneously adjust to changes in local
customer tastes and competitor activities (Ahmed et al., 2019). This approach is more powerful
in promoting quicker innovations and responses, but can lead to a fragmented brand identity
across markets. Lately, Coca-Cola is trying to overhaul elements of its leadership system by
delegating more responsibility to the lower level of the organization in order to make fast
changes. At the same time, PepsiCo has united some of its previously divided camps to more
concerted strategic action. This shows that both organizations find an advantage in the concept of
balance, which means that in the contemporary fast-paced business world centralized strategy
and vision should be matched with decentralize innovation and flexibility (Mostafa et al., 2023).
Locating this balance in leadership approaches is a dynamic issue.

 Evaluation of Coca-Cola's ability to handle future business challenges

10
The major challenges that Coca-Cola will have to deal with in future are changing consumer
preferences, sustainability issues and growing competition. The leadership of Coca-Cola has
some advantages, which should help the company to overcome these challenges, but it also has
some weaknesses, which may prevent them from the needed change. Some sort of an advantage
is that Coca-cola is blessed with constant and experienced leadership at the executive level. The
present CEO, James Quincey, has been employed with the company for more than 20 years and,
therefore, has a close understanding of the brands, distribution, and relationships that Coca-Cola
possesses. This makes him authoritative in the process of strategy setting. In addition, Coca-Cola
has shown readiness to develop, as evidenced by the investmetns in such new products as
smartwater, fairlife milk, and Costa Coffee. Owning these brands demonstrates the ability to
adapt to dynamic consumer preferences (Okoye-Chine, 2021). But Coca-Cola has the weakness
of being a large, bureaucratic organization, and large organizations can find it hard to pivot
quickly. Layers of management and an institutional resistance to risk may prevent leaders from
acting nimbly to capitalize on trends like health and wellness. While Coca-Cola is investing in
sustainability efforts, it still depends heavily on single-use packaging which consumers
increasingly shun. Fostering a startup mentality and attitude amongst certain internal teams or
brands could make Coca-Cola more adaptive. In summary, Coca-Cola exhibits thoughtful
leadership focused on the company's longevity and growth (Okoye-Chine, 2021). With
measured, strategic risks and a willingness to update the brand portfolio, leaders demonstrate an
ability to guide the company through coming challenges. However, bureaucratic structures may
hamper fast action. Promoting entrepreneurial leadership where possible can help Coca-Cola
respond promptly to rapidly shifting consumer priorities.

Task 2 - Leadership for Performance

 Creation of a Balanced Scorecard for Coca-Cola with Strategic Objectives and Key
Performance Indicators
Creation of a balanced scorecard with strategic objectives and key performance indicators (KPIs)
can help Coca-Cola's leadership team track progress across critical areas of the business. Four
proposed strategic objectives are: Market Leadership focused on sustaining and growing market
share through brand awareness and new product success; Financial Performance tracking
profitability and return on investment; Operational Excellence improving efficiency, supply
chain reliability and production uptime; and Customer Satisfaction centered on retention, net
promoter score and complaint resolution. Specific KPIs tied to each strategic objective could
include: Market Share Percentage, Brand Awareness Index and New Product Launch Success
Rate under Market Leadership; Revenue Growth Rate, Profit Margin and Return on Investment
under Financial Performance; Production Efficiency, Supply Chain Reliability and
Manufacturing Downtime under Operational Excellence; and finally Customer Retention Rate,
Net Promoter Score and Customer Complaint Resolution Time under Customer Satisfaction.
11
 (Source: Self-made)

 Explanation of how "Leadership for Performance" approaches can help achieve

objectives
Effective leadership is critical for driving organizational performance and enabling teams to
achieve objectives. Coca-Cola can leverage several leadership approaches to boost performance:

Leadership Style Explanation

Transformational Transformational leaders motivate their teams to perform better by linking
Leadership the objectives of the company to something greater. They are a role model
of desired behaviors, intellectually challenge teams, and offer support and
coaching (Khaing, 2019). Coca-Cola is present in more than 200 countries,
therefore, transformational leadership at all levels and regions will align
multi-cultural teams to the mission of bringing happiness through refresh
consumers.

Situational Situational leaders adjust their style to follower readiness by demonstrating

Leadership directive or supportive behaviors. The new products and technologies that

12
 Coca-Cola introduces allow leaders to give more guidance in reskilling
their employees. With a growing competence, they tend to adopt the
delegative approach where they leave the employees to take charge. This
versatility will speed up capability development (Xiao & Zhang, 2020).
Servant Servant leaders value the growth and needs of the team to unleash
Leadership potential. Coca-Cola leaders can enhance engagement, retention and
performance by creating a caring, ethical culture, listening actively and
focusing on employee development. This leadership style also supports
sustainability, as servant leaders are intrinsically motivated to create a
positive impact (Guo & Wen, 2021).
Authentic Authentic leaders build credibility and earn respect by leading with
Leadership sincerity, passion and conviction (Maisoni et al., 2019). They empower
teams through transparency, balanced processing and moral perspective
taking. As Coca-Cola navigates challenging issues like health concerns,
environmental impact and social tensions in divided communities,
authentic leadership will build trust in the brand and the ability to translate
global strategies into local actions (Veysel & Baykut, 2023).

 Critical evaluation of recent quarterly financial statements and performance

A review of Coca-Cola's recent quarterly financial statements indicates there are some areas of
strong performance, but also some concerning trends that leadership should address. On the
positive side, the company continues to generate significant operating income and net revenue.
For example, in Q3 2022, operating income was $3.4 billion, up 14% from Q3 2021. Similarly,
net revenues grew 16% to $11.1 billion (Simões-Coelho et al., 2023). This top-line growth
demonstrates the strength of Coca-Cola's diversified portfolio of brands and its ability to pass on
price increases during a high inflationary environment. However, a deeper analysis of the
financial statements reveals some potential red flags. While volumes grew globally by 4%, that
was driven entirely by growth in developing and emerging markets (Khan & Raza, 2023).
Volumes in developed markets actually declined 2% - concerning given the higher profit margins
in those geographies. In North America, volumes declined even further at 3%. Leadership should
assess if this signals eroding market share or consumer demand issues in critical developed
markets. Additionally, gross margins declined 290 basis points and operating margins 160 basis
points compared to prior year - squeezed by ongoing supply chain constraints and rising input
costs (Chu, 2020). While some margin compression is understandable given inflationary
pressures, the decline was bigger than expected signaling potential risks to profitability going
forward if volumes stall or input costs continue rising (Larcker & Tayan, 2023).

13
As such, Coca-Cola's leadership team should take proactive steps to drive improved performance
including:
 Assess portfolio/pricing mix in developed markets to ensure competitiveness and
affordability amidst economic uncertainty
 Accelerate supply chain investments and supplier negotiations to increase flexibility and
offset input cost volatility
 Double down on brand investment and consumer marketing to drive recruitment and
retention as volumes indicate potential consumer attrition challenges
Addressing these areas head on will enable Coca-Cola to sustain its strong top-line momentum
while also expanding margins and profitability over the long-term. The business has many core
strengths to build from, but leadership must tackle the current warning signs around consumer
demand, profitability, and market share trends.

Task 3 - Ethical Leadership

 Critical evaluation of significant ethical issues faced by Coca-Cola
Coca-Cola has experienced a number of critical ethical problems in its long path as a global
beverage company. A critical analysis of these issues as well as the recommendations will help
improve the ethical leadership practices of Coca-Cola in the future.
 Workplace Discrimination
There have been numerous lawsuits against Coca-Cola claiming the company is guilty of large-
scale discrimination of minorities in the pay and promotion system. In its most recent case in
2021, Coca-Cola accepted to pay $2.6 million to settle a case of discrimination against more than
100 black employees. Although Coca-Cola denies fault, these repetitive incidents signal possible
inadequacies in fair and ethical treatment of all employees regardless of race. The Coca-Cola
leadership should strengthen the non-discrimination policies, provide equity in pay and
promotion processes, and conduct regular bias audits (Brondoni, 2019).
 Health Impacts
Leading producer of sweet beverages which are related to the worldwide rise of obesity and
diabetes rates, Coca-Cola has been under constant scrutiny of the health impacts of its products.
Though Coca-Cola has diversified into other healthier products, health advocates argue regarding
its ethical obligation. Coca-Cola leadership has to strategically balance business objectives,
consumer preferences, and ethical aspects related to health consequences of society. Measures
could involve more diversification, marketing/pricing strategies to steer consumer choices to
low/no-calorie options, and restriction of sales within schools.
 Environmental Sustainability

14
The large production and distribution footprints of Coca-Cola also raises environmental
sustainability concerns from transportation emissions to plastic pollution. The leadership has
promised renewed environmental targets, however, the higher recyclable packing rates and
recycled in content usage in practice are a work in progress. Leadership should not stop
promoting activities that reduce emissions, waste, plastic usage and stimulate emergence of
sustainable packaging innovations. Association of Coca-Cola with sustainability-oriented
organizations can in addition, strengthen its ethical responsibility in this important area (Chiu et
al., 2019).
In summary, while Coca-Cola has stated its aims to uphold ethical business practices, recurring
issues spotlight gaps between principles and practice. A clear-sighted examination of these
ethical dilemmas paired with robust initiatives across company policies, governance systems,
operating procedures, and even pricing strategies could help Coca-Cola leadership chart a more
ethical and socially/environmentally responsible path forward (Singaram et al., 2019). The global
brand power of Coca-Cola also provides an opportunity to drive positive change through ethical
leadership on major societal issues facing the global community.

 Recommendations for managing identified ethical issues effectively

It is necessary for Coca-Cola to be proactive in addressing ethical issues and managing them
properly. The ethics and compliance department can be established with a Chief Ethics and
Compliance Officer in charge who is directly responsible to the CEO and the Board. This group
should deal with the assessment of the ethical risks, revision of ethics policies, training of ethics
to the employees, investigation of the breach, and ensuring accountability. An important task is
conducting regular surveys of the employees to detect ethical issues or breaches on all levels of
the organization. Awareness of policies, reporting violations, observed misconduct, pressures to
compromise values, and overall ethical culture should be considered in surveys (Wee et al.,
2023). Data needs to be evaluated to identify areas of problems and to guide the strategy. Total
anonymity is to be kept in order for the employees to feel comfortable when giving the true
feedback and not to be afraid of revenge. Subsequently, full company-wide ethics training
programs should be introduced to set out desired behaviours (Twekambe, 2019).
Training should explain applicable policies, provide case studies of right behaviour, provide
ethical decision-making frameworks, and explain how to report difficulties. Monitor completion
rates to ensure all staff complete mandated courses annually. Compliance under pressure should
be addressed in person training for high-risk positions like sales. Ethics complaints need an
impartial, private reporting system. Investigations of misbehaviour, policy breaches, or
retribution should be rigorous and follow a routine. Do not expose or shame the informant. All
infractions should result in immediate punishment, corrective action, and possibly termination
regardless of seniority (Maisoni et al., 2019).

15
Finally, together with financial indicators, management pay should include ethics performance
measures. Some parts of leader bonuses and equity awards should tie to audit ratings, training
completion, policy adherence, and culture survey results (Ibrahim & Daniel, 2019). Linking
remuneration to ethics and compliance makes people at the top more dedicated to it and offers
incentives through which the right conducts can be rewarded. To summarize, the allocation of
resources solely to ethics programs, proactively detecting issues through surveys, extensive
employee training, offering safe reporting channels, enforcing discipline, and integrating ethics
into reward structures are major strategies Coca-Cola must implement to manage ethical risk and
culture effectively in its global organization. To be successful in the long run, the approach must
be championed by the leadership from the top.

16
References
Ahmed, E., Khan, A.W. and Minhas, S., 2019. Role of organizational public relations in image
building of publics: A case study of Coca Cola Pakistan. Journal Global Regional Review
(Online), 4.
Ally, J.S., 2022. Impacts of Reward Management Systems on Employee Performance”: A Study
of Coca-Cola Kwanza Bottlers Company Ltd in Tanzania (Doctoral dissertation, The Open
University of Tanzania).
Appie, L., Ndletyana, D. and Wilson-Prangley, A., 2020. Empowering the next generation of
leaders: Maserame Mouyeme’s journey at Coca-Cola. Emerald Emerging Markets Case
Studies, 10(2), pp.1-24.
Brondoni, S.M., 2019. Shareowners, stakeholders & the global oversize economy. The coca-cola
company case. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, (1), pp.16-27.
Chiu, H., Fischer, D. and Friedman, H., 2019. Board Diversity in Audit and Finance Committees:
A Case Study of Coca-Cola. In Diversity within Diversity Management: Types of Diversity in
Organizations (pp. 95-113). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Chu, B., 2020, November. Analysis on the success of Coca-Cola marketing strategy. In 2020 2nd
International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2020) (pp.
96-100). Atlantis Press.
Guo, X. and Wen, M., 2021, December. Research on Competitive Strategy of Coca-Cola
Company. In 2021 3rd International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural
Industry (ICEMCI 2021) (pp. 2879-2885). Atlantis Press.
Huse, O., Reeve, E., Bell, C., Sacks, G., Baker, P., Wood, B. and Backholer, K., 2022. Strategies
used by the soft drink industry to grow and sustain sales: a case-study of The Coca-Cola
Company in East Asia. BMJ global health, 7(12), p.e010386.
Ibrahim, A.U. and Daniel, C.O., 2019. Impact of leadership on organisational
performance. International Journal of Business, Management and Social Research, 6(2), pp.367-
374.
Ismail, Y., Sarif, S. M., & Azan, Z. (2017). The Impact of Maqasid al-Shariah on Dynamic
Governance of Social Enterprises. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Islamic
Jurisprudence. International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.
Karam, A.A., 2021. The brand impact on culture: case of Coca Cola cultural issues in India.
In The Importance of New Technologies and Entrepreneurship in Business Development: In The
Context of Economic Diversity in Developing Countries: The Impact of New Technologies and
Entrepreneurship on Business Development (pp. 551-570). Springer International Publishing.

17
Khaing, A.A., 2019. THE EFFECT OF LEADERSHIP STYLES ON EMPLOYEE
COMMITMENT AND JOB PERFORMANCE OF FAIRDEAL CO., LTD (Doctoral dissertation,
MERAL Portal).
Khan, T.I. and Raza, S.A., 2023. Revitalizing the Retail: A Case of the Coca-Cola
Company. Asian Journal of Management Cases, 20(2), pp.174-182.
KURA, Y., 2019. ASSESSMENT OF TRAINING PRACTICES IN EAST AFRICA BOTTLING SC
(COCA COLA) (Doctoral dissertation, St. Mary's University).
Larcker, D.F. and Tayan, B., 2023. Seven Gaping Holes in Our Knowledge of Corporate
Governance. Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Working Paper
Forthcoming.
Leong, M.I., 2019. Leadership Styles and Its Impact on Employee Morale: An Exploratory
Study (Doctoral dissertation, California State University, Northridge).
Maisoni, H., Yasri, Y. and Abror, A., 2019, April. Effect of organizational culture, leadership and
compensation on employee engagement in coca-cola amatil indonesia central sumatra. In 2nd
Padang International Conference on Education, Economics, Business and Accounting
(PICEEBA-2 2018) (pp. 553-561). Atlantis Press.
Mostafa, M.M.M., Alshehri, A.A. and Salama, R.S., 2023. High performance of supercapacitor
based on alumina nanoparticles derived from Coca-Cola cans. Journal of Energy Storage, 64,
p.107168.
Okoye-Chine, M., 2021. The effect of sales promotion on marketing of Coca Cola drinks in
Anambra State. International Journal of Innovative Social Sciences & Humanities
Research, 9(1), pp.117-129.
Onyusheva, I.V., 2019. Gender Aspect in Leadership: Who is Better in Leading
PositionS. Вестник университета «Туран», (3), pp.119-123.
Simões-Coelho, M., Figueira, A.R. and Russo, E., 2023. Balancing global corporate
sustainability engagement in asymmetric markets: The Coca-Cola Co. case. Sustainable
Production and Consumption, 40, pp.89-100.
Singaram, R., Ramasubramani, A., Mehta, A. and Arora, P., 2019. Coca Cola: A study on the
marketing strategies for millenniums focusing on India. International Journal of Advanced
Research and Development, 4(1), pp.62-68.
Twekambe, M., 2019. Leadership styles and employee performance: A case study of coca cola
Uganda, Namanve, Mukono district (Doctoral dissertation, College of Humanities and Social
Sciences).

18
Umit, B.A.I.B.O.S.S.Y.N.O.V.A., 2021. Leadership Style of Kazakhstani Females in Fast
Moving Consumer Goods Sector (Doctoral dissertation, Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University).
van Eyck, W. and Steenkamp, Y., 2021. Leadership Capacities Contributing to the Success of a
Multi-Stakeholder Partnership in Eswatini. In Sustainable Development Goals for Society Vol. 1:
Selected topics of global relevance (pp. 155-167). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Veysel, K.U.L.A. and Baykut, E., 2023. Does Better Corporate Governance Rating Lead to
Higher Market Value?: an Empirical Investigation of BIST XKURY Listed Companies. Ejovoc
(Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges), 5(7), pp.30-43.
Wee, L.S., Sidharta, H. and Harianto, E., 2023. THE ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZEN
BEHAVIOR ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: A CASE STUDY COCA COLA OFFICIAL
DISTRIBUTOR. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research
(IJEBAR), 7(4).
Wood, B., Ruskin, G. and Sacks, G., 2020. How Coca-Cola shaped the international congress on
physical activity and public health: an analysis of email exchanges between 2012 and
2014. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(23), p.8996.
Xiao, Z. and Zhang, J., 2020. The Analysis of Effectiveness of Cost Control Strategy on the
Profitability of Coca-Cola Company From Year 2015 to 2017. Management, 8(3), pp.232-239.

19