Statement of Defence
Statement of Defence
REF No.
_________________________ FORM No. 5
STATEMENT OF DEFENCE
PART A1: Compulsory Information to be included in the Statement of Defence
DETAILS OF CLAIMANT2
NAME
ADDRESS
DETAILS OF RESPONDENT3
NAME
ADDRESS
For the purposes of Article 30 of the Arbitration Act, the respondent hereby provides:
1. A statement of facts supporting the defence:
1. Whilst the Claimant Company refers to “agreements dated sixth (6 th) October two thousand seventeen
(2017)”, no agreement was annexed with its Statement of Claim and therefore it is not clear what
agreement Claimant Company is referring to and basing its claims on.
2. This notwithstanding, the Respondent Company is not a party to any agreement with the Claimant
Company and therefore is clearly not a party to the said “agreements dated sixth (6th) October two
thousand seventeen (2017)”.
3. Consequently, contrary to what is declared in the Statement of Claim, the Claimant Company was never
engaged by the Respondent Company for the performance of any works.
4. Respondent Company never accepted any balance as being due and payable to Claimant Company and is
contesting any such legitimate balances.
1. Respondent Company is not the legitimate and proper defendant, since there was and/or is no
contractual relationship between Respondent Company and Claimant Company and no instructions were
ever given by the former to the latter. Accordingly, any eventual order given by the Arbitral Tribunal must
necessarily be issued limitedly against the other Respondent Company.
1
Where the space provided is not sufficient, further information may be submitted in separate sheets annexed to this form.
2
The term ‘claimant’ includes one or more claimants.
3
The term ‘respondent’ includes one or more respondents.
2. Whilst Respondent Company reiterates its position that as a matter of fact it has no contractual
relationship with Claimant Company and therefore it is not contractually bound by any arbitration clause
in relation to the present dispute, Respondent Company hereby submits to the jurisdiction of the Arbitral
Tribunal, without prejudice, however, to its first preliminary plea.
3. On the merits, and subordinately and without prejudice to the preceding pleas, Respondent Company
states with respect that the claims of Claimant Company are unfounded in fact and at law, particularly
(but not limitedly) for the following reasons –
(i) no direct instructions to carry out works were given to Claimant Company by Respondent Company;
(ii) the claims do not refer to actual work carried out by Claimant Company, but rather it appears that a
substantial part of the amount claimed refers to alleged damages and/or penalties that Claimant
Company calculated unilaterally and which is certainly not being accepted by Respondent Company;
(iii) Respondent Company made payments to the other Respondent Company in the present proceedings,
in relation to the amounts being claimed by Claimant Company.
4. Without any prejudice to the above, Respondent Company has itself a claim for damages against the
Claimant Company and this since for a period of time it blocked access to the site in such way that it
disrupted the works at the same site.
A decision in which the Arbitral Tribunal upholds the pleas raised by Respondent Company and rejects all the
claims made by Claimant Company.
Respondent Company reserves the right to file documents in the course of the proceedings.
All the witnesses indicated by Claimant Company and by the other Respondent Company.
Directors, officials, employees and representatives – past and present – of Respondent Company.
No plea to the jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal is being raised for the reasons mentioned in 2.2 above.
4
Where the space provided is not sufficient, further information may be submitted in separate sheets annexed to this form.
5
Ibid.
6
Ibid.
PART E: Service of the Statement of Defence
The Statement of Defence shall be served on the claimant and the arbitral tribunal: (a) by the respondent
or (b) by the Malta Arbitration Centre7.
The Respondent agrees with the Claimant on the appointment of __________________________ as the
arbitrator to hear and decide this arbitration.
OR
The Respondent does not agree with the person/s proposed by Claimant to act as arbitrator/s and
recommends the following person/s:
Apart from drawing up his Statement of Defence, the respondent may wish to make a counter-claim
arising out of the same contract or he may wish to rely on a claim arising out of the same contract for the
purpose of a set-off and this in terms of Article 30 (3) and (4) of the Arbitration Act.
________________________________ _____________________
Signature of Respondent/Representative Date
7
Delete as necessary.
PART H: For office use only
Date of filing of the Statement of Defence: By whom this form has been filed: