Calcutta High Court Ruling in An Income Tax Matter
Calcutta High Court Ruling in An Income Tax Matter
ITAT/41/2024
IA NO: GA/2/2024
BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
And
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
The Court: This appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) against the order dated 8th May, 2023 passed
The Revenue has raised the following substantial questions of law for
consideration:-
(a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble
(b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble
We have heard Mr. Tilak Mitra, learned counsel along with Mr. Prithu
Dudhoria, learned standing counsel for the appellant and Mr. Sourav Chunder,
The short question which falls for consideration in the instant case is
whether the addition made under Section 68 of the Act was justified. The
which ought to have been done by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)
(Appeals) dated 28th July, 2017 none of the grounds raised by the assessee was
However, the learned Tribunal has examined the facts produced by the
assessee not before the Tribunal for the first time but the facts which were
already placed before the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal noted that the
Assessing Officer did not comment upon the veracity or the admissibility of any
of the details or documents produced by the assessee to prove the identity, the
transaction. It appears that only because the directors failed to respond to the
notices issued, the Assessing Officer drew an adverse inference. This the
question of law much less substantial question of law arising for consideration
in this appeal.
bp/R.Bhar