Unit V PM&E
Unit V PM&E
The social sector and entrepreneurship are closely related, but they serve different purposes
and have distinct approaches. Understanding the relationship between them can provide
insights into how social entrepreneurship is shaping the world.
The social sector refers to the part of society that focuses on addressing societal challenges,
improving the quality of life, and supporting underserved or marginalized populations. This
sector includes nonprofit organizations, social services, foundations, and charitable
initiatives. The main goals of the social sector are:
2. Entrepreneurship Perspective
Entrepreneurship traditionally refers to the creation of businesses with the aim of generating
profits. Entrepreneurs identify opportunities in the market, create innovative solutions, and
take risks to build and scale businesses. The key aspects of entrepreneurship include:
Social entrepreneurship blends the principles of both the social sector and traditional
entrepreneurship. It involves identifying social issues and applying entrepreneurial strategies
to solve them. Social entrepreneurs are driven by the desire to make a meaningful social
impact while also creating sustainable, scalable solutions. They often focus on innovating in
areas like education, healthcare, poverty alleviation, environmental protection, and human
rights.
Key Characteristics of Social Entrepreneurship:
Increase Efficiency: Technology can help social enterprises improve the delivery of
services and reduce costs, which in turn helps them reach more people with fewer
resources.
Scale Impact: Digital tools and platforms enable social enterprises to scale their
solutions to global or national levels, even with limited resources.
Monitor and Measure Impact: Social enterprises can use technology to collect data,
analyze impact, and improve the effectiveness of their initiatives.
Conclusion
The social sector and entrepreneurship both aim to make the world a better place but through
different means. Social entrepreneurship uniquely combines both approaches, applying
innovative, business-driven methods to solve pressing social challenges. By aligning financial
sustainability with social impact, social entrepreneurs are reshaping how we think about
business and social change.
The potential for social entrepreneurship:
The potential for social entrepreneurship is vast, as it represents a powerful and innovative
approach to addressing the world’s most pressing social, environmental, and economic
challenges. Social entrepreneurship has gained significant momentum over the past few
decades, and its potential is expanding rapidly due to the evolving nature of both the global
economy and social issues. Below are key areas where social entrepreneurship holds
tremendous potential:
Social entrepreneurs are uniquely positioned to address some of the world’s biggest
problems. These challenges—ranging from poverty and inequality to climate change and
health crises—often require innovative, scalable solutions that go beyond traditional charity
or governmental aid models.
Social entrepreneurship allows for the creation of business models that are financially
sustainable while also creating social good. Unlike traditional charity or philanthropic efforts
that often rely on donations or government funding, social enterprises can generate revenue
through selling products or services, which can be reinvested into their mission.
Digital Platforms: Mobile apps or web-based platforms can connect individuals with
services, training, or resources, especially in remote or underserved regions.
Impact Measurement: Social enterprises can use data analytics, machine learning,
and other tech tools to track, measure, and improve their social impact.
Global Reach: Technology allows social entrepreneurs to scale quickly and
efficiently, even across international borders, helping to solve local problems with
global solutions.
Social entrepreneurship can stimulate local economies by creating jobs and fostering
entrepreneurship. Many social enterprises, especially those focused on economic
empowerment, help communities by providing job opportunities, training, and business
development resources.
The potential of social entrepreneurship grows when it aligns with the priorities of
governments, businesses, and other sectors. Public-private partnerships and collaborations
between social enterprises and corporations can enhance the impact and reach of social
solutions.
Strategic Partnerships:
Social entrepreneurs often challenge societal norms and conventions. Their work can help
shift public perceptions about social issues, encouraging broader social, cultural, and
behavioral change. By raising awareness, driving conversations, and advocating for social
change, social entrepreneurs contribute to long-term societal transformation.
Shifting Attitudes: Social entrepreneurs can influence public opinion and shift
societal attitudes toward issues like inequality, environmental conservation, and
mental health.
Advocacy and Activism: Many social entrepreneurs use their platforms to advocate
for policy changes, such as better labor laws, environmental protection policies, or
increased access to education.
Reframing Success: Social entrepreneurship is redefining what success looks like by
focusing not only on profit but also on creating social value.
The potential for social entrepreneurship is enormous. It offers sustainable, scalable solutions
to social challenges, promotes innovation, and empowers communities to solve their own
problems. As global challenges become more complex and traditional solutions become less
effective, social entrepreneurship has emerged as a transformative force that can reshape
industries, economies, and societies for the better. The future holds great promise for social
entrepreneurs who continue to innovate and push boundaries in their quest for social change.
The various models of social entrepreneurship:
Social entrepreneurship can take various forms, depending on the specific mission, target
population, and resources available. The flexibility of social entrepreneurship allows it to
adapt to different contexts and needs. Here are some of the most common models of social
entrepreneurship, each with distinct characteristics and approaches to creating social impact.
This is one of the most traditional forms of social entrepreneurship. Social entrepreneurs
using the nonprofit model focus on creating social value without a primary focus on profit
generation. Nonprofits in the social entrepreneurship space work to address societal issues
through charitable programs, services, and advocacy.
Key Characteristics:
Example: The Salvation Army operates as a nonprofit, providing social services and support
to vulnerable populations. While it operates like a traditional nonprofit, its social mission
aligns with the core principles of social entrepreneurship.
The hybrid model blends elements of both nonprofit and for-profit business models. Social
enterprises using this model generate income from business activities while also working
toward social missions. Hybrid organizations often reinvest profits into their social goals,
allowing them to be financially sustainable while maintaining a strong social focus.
Key Characteristics:
Revenue Generation: Part of the organization’s revenue comes from the sale of
products or services, allowing for financial sustainability.
Mission Integration: While generating income, the business operations align closely
with the organization’s social mission.
Examples: Social enterprises often use this model to address societal challenges like
health, education, or the environment while maintaining financial self-sufficiency.
Example: Grameen Bank combines financial services with social impact, providing
microloans to help people in poverty start small businesses. While it generates revenue from
loans, the bank reinvests profits to expand its mission of poverty alleviation.
3. The For-Profit Social Enterprise Model
In this model, the organization is structured as a traditional for-profit business but operates
with a primary goal of addressing social, environmental, or cultural issues. The main
difference between traditional businesses and for-profit social enterprises is that they measure
success not only by financial profits but also by their social impact. These organizations may
still pay dividends or profits to investors, but their social mission remains central.
Key Characteristics:
Profit Generation: The business generates profit, but with a strong social mission
embedded into its business model.
Scalability: These businesses are designed to scale and expand, both in terms of
profit and social impact.
Examples: This model often includes enterprises that operate in sectors like clean
energy, affordable housing, or education.
Example: TOMS Shoes follows a for-profit model while integrating a social mission into its
operations. For every pair of shoes sold, TOMS donates a pair to someone in need, creating a
clear link between profit generation and social impact.
A cooperative is an organization owned and operated by its members for their mutual benefit.
In a social entrepreneurship context, cooperatives are formed to address collective needs and
empower communities, often focusing on worker ownership, fair trade, and sustainable
business practices.
Key Characteristics:
Key Characteristics:
Financial and Social Returns: The goal is to achieve both financial profit and
positive social or environmental outcomes.
Investment Approach: Social entrepreneurs raise capital through investments rather
than traditional grants or donations.
Examples: Impact investing can be applied across a variety of sectors, including
renewable energy, healthcare, education, and poverty alleviation.
Example: Acumen Fund is an impact investing organization that provides patient capital to
businesses in the developing world. Their investments focus on sectors like affordable
housing, clean energy, and healthcare, aiming for both financial returns and measurable
social impact.
The social franchise model allows for the replication of a social enterprise across multiple
locations using the franchise model. This enables a successful social enterprise to expand its
reach and impact, while maintaining consistency in delivering its services or products.
Key Characteristics:
Example: The Big Issue is a social franchise that allows homeless individuals to sell
magazines to earn an income, providing them with both a business opportunity and a sense of
dignity. The model is replicated in various countries around the world.
In this model, social entrepreneurs focus on raising awareness, advocating for policy change,
and pushing for systemic change to address social issues. These social enterprises often do
not provide direct services or products but instead work to influence public opinion and
government policy.
Key Characteristics:
Policy Change: The primary goal is to influence laws, regulations, and public policy
related to a social issue.
Awareness and Advocacy: Social entrepreneurs in this model engage in advocacy,
public campaigns, and lobbying efforts to create long-term social change.
Examples: Advocacy-based organizations focus on human rights, environmental
conservation, political reform, or social justice.
Example: The Gates Foundation is a major advocate for global health initiatives, using its
resources to influence policy changes and raise awareness about issues like malaria,
HIV/AIDS, and global education.
Key Characteristics:
Example: Feeding America and other food banks have used similar models where donations
help distribute food to those in need, often with the option to subscribe to regular donations
that support long-term sustainability.
Conclusion
The diversity of social entrepreneurship models demonstrates the flexibility and adaptability
of social enterprises. Each model has its own advantages and challenges, but they all share a
common goal: to create social or environmental value through innovative, sustainable, and
scalable solutions. The right model often depends on the specific problem being addressed,
the resources available, and the desired impact. As social entrepreneurship continues to grow,
these models will evolve to meet new challenges and opportunities.
Social innovation and sustainability are two interconnected concepts that focus on creating
positive social, environmental, and economic change. They both seek to address pressing
global challenges, but they do so through innovative, systemic approaches that promote long-
term solutions. The realms of social innovation and sustainability cover a wide range of
areas where new ideas, practices, and models can lead to transformative change. Below, we
explore the key realms in both areas:
1. Social Innovation
2. Sustainability
Sustainability focuses on meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability
of future generations to meet their own needs. It encompasses environmental, social, and
economic sustainability, often referred to as the “three pillars” of sustainability.
Conclusion:
The realms of social innovation and sustainability represent areas of immense opportunity
for creating meaningful, long-term change in society and the environment. Social innovation
focuses on developing new solutions to meet social needs, while sustainability works to
ensure that these solutions are viable in the long run, protecting future generations. Both
fields are intrinsically connected, as social innovations must increasingly consider
environmental and social sustainability to achieve lasting impact. The potential for positive
change in these areas is vast, and as both concepts continue to evolve, they hold the promise
of creating more equitable, resilient, and sustainable societies.
Marketing management for social ventures, or social enterprises, involves adapting traditional
marketing principles to the unique needs of organizations that aim to create both social
impact and financial sustainability. Unlike conventional businesses that focus solely on
profit, social ventures prioritize addressing social, environmental, or cultural issues.
Therefore, their marketing strategies must balance both mission-driven goals and market-
oriented objectives. Below are key marketing management concepts specifically tailored for
social ventures:
1. Social Marketing
Application to Social Ventures: Social ventures can use social marketing to build awareness
of their cause, encourage people to take specific actions (e.g., donating, volunteering), or
influence public perceptions of a social issue. For instance, a social enterprise focusing on
environmental sustainability might use social marketing to promote eco-friendly behavior
among consumers, like reducing plastic use or supporting sustainable products.
2. Segmenting and Targeting for Social Impact
The Triple Bottom Line framework emphasizes three key pillars of sustainability—People,
Planet, and Profit. In the marketing context, TBL encourages social ventures to measure and
communicate success across social impact, environmental sustainability, and economic
viability.
Social Impact: How the venture contributes to solving a social issue (e.g., reducing
poverty, increasing access to education).
Environmental Impact: How the venture addresses environmental concerns (e.g.,
reducing waste, using sustainable materials).
Economic Viability: How the venture sustains itself financially and remains
profitable in the long run.
Application to Social Ventures: Social ventures should communicate their TBL efforts
clearly to stakeholders, including customers, investors, and the community. Marketing
materials (e.g., websites, brochures, social media) should highlight the enterprise's social and
environmental impact alongside financial outcomes. For example, a venture that produces
eco-friendly products should demonstrate both the environmental benefits (planet) and the
sustainable business practices (profit).
4. Cause-Related Marketing
Application to Social Ventures: A social enterprise focused on providing clean water might
launch a cause-related marketing campaign with a product line where a portion of sales goes
toward building wells in underserved areas. This not only promotes the product but also
raises awareness about the cause.
Branding for social ventures involves creating a brand identity that reflects both the social
mission and the value proposition. Storytelling is a powerful tool in conveying the mission of
the social enterprise and engaging customers emotionally.
Emotional Appeal: Storytelling allows social ventures to connect with their audience
on a deeper emotional level by sharing the story behind the mission—why it exists
and how it impacts real lives.
Authenticity: Authenticity is crucial in branding for social ventures. Consumers and
stakeholders value transparency and sincerity in how social ventures present
themselves.
Application to Social Ventures: A social enterprise that helps women in rural areas start
small businesses could use storytelling to highlight the success stories of women whose lives
have been transformed through the venture's support. The storytelling would emphasize the
human side of the mission, building trust and engagement with customers.
In traditional marketing, businesses focus on customer satisfaction and meeting their needs.
Social ventures should maintain this approach but also balance it with the mission of creating
social value. The concept involves offering products or services that not only meet customer
needs but also address broader societal challenges.
Customer Education: Social ventures often need to educate their customers about
the social impact of their purchase decisions, as customers might not immediately see
the connection between the product and the social cause.
Empathy and Engagement: Social ventures must demonstrate empathy toward their
target customers and beneficiaries, positioning themselves as both a business and a
catalyst for social change.
Social media is a cost-effective and powerful tool for social ventures to amplify their
message, engage their community, and build a loyal customer base.
Advocacy Campaigns: Social ventures can use platforms like Instagram, Facebook,
and Twitter to run advocacy campaigns, share stories of impact, and connect with
potential customers, volunteers, and donors.
Building a Community: Social media allows social ventures to create online
communities that share common values and can be mobilized for action (e.g.,
fundraising, awareness campaigns, or supporting a social cause).
Application to Social Ventures: A social enterprise focused on reducing plastic waste could
run a social media campaign encouraging followers to commit to using reusable products.
Through hashtags, user-generated content, and educational posts, the venture could build a
strong, engaged online community aligned with its mission.
Social ventures often collaborate with other organizations, including for-profit businesses,
nonprofits, and governmental entities, to amplify their impact and marketing reach.
Social ventures need to clearly communicate the outcomes of their work and the impact of
their marketing efforts. This involves measuring both the social and environmental outcomes
of the business, as well as how marketing activities contribute to these outcomes.
Application to Social Ventures: A social venture that provides vocational training could use
impact reporting to share success stories and provide data on how their training programs
have helped individuals find employment or start businesses, demonstrating the real-world
value of their products/services.
Conclusion
Marketing management for social ventures requires a strategic approach that blends
traditional marketing principles with a deep focus on social impact. By leveraging social
marketing, storytelling, cause-related marketing, and collaborative efforts, social
enterprises can effectively communicate their mission and create a lasting impact. A
customer-centric, transparent, and community-driven marketing approach will help social
ventures not only grow but also scale their social impact for long-term sustainability.
Risk management is crucial for social enterprises as they operate in a unique space where
they must balance both social impact and financial sustainability. Social enterprises face a
variety of risks that can affect their ability to achieve their mission and maintain long-term
viability. These risks range from financial instability to social, operational, and reputational
risks. Therefore, it’s essential to have robust risk management strategies in place to mitigate
potential threats and ensure the social mission can continue effectively.
Here are the key risk management strategies for social enterprises:
Financial risks are a significant concern for social enterprises, which often rely on a mix of
funding sources, including grants, donations, revenue from services/products, and impact
investors. Financial mismanagement or dependence on one source of funding can be risky.
Strategies:
Operational risks are risks associated with the day-to-day operations of the social enterprise,
including inefficiencies, production delays, supply chain disruptions, or workforce
challenges.
Strategies:
Since social enterprises are mission-driven, the primary risk is not meeting the intended
social or environmental outcomes. If a social venture’s impact fails to materialize or is not as
effective as expected, it undermines the organization's credibility and mission.
Strategies:
Impact Measurement and Evaluation: Regularly track and assess the social impact
of the enterprise through key performance indicators (KPIs), metrics, and feedback
from beneficiaries. Using frameworks like the Theory of Change or Social Return
on Investment (SROI) can help measure the long-term effectiveness of the social
enterprise’s activities.
Stakeholder Engagement: Engage with beneficiaries, community members, and
other stakeholders to understand their needs and ensure that the enterprise’s activities
align with those needs. This helps to ensure that the enterprise’s social initiatives are
relevant and impactful.
Adapting to Feedback: Establish mechanisms to regularly collect feedback and
make necessary adjustments to the business model, programs, or strategies. Being
adaptable helps ensure the enterprise stays aligned with its mission and effectively
addresses social issues.
Partnerships and Collaboration: Collaborating with other organizations (including
nonprofits, government agencies, or impact investors) that share similar goals can
help strengthen the social enterprise’s impact and share best practices, reducing the
risk of failing to achieve the desired social outcomes.
Social enterprises are particularly vulnerable to reputational risks, as their credibility and
trustworthiness are directly linked to their social mission. Negative publicity, failure to meet
commitments, or ethical issues can severely damage a social enterprise’s reputation.
Strategies:
Ethical Practices and Transparency: Operate with transparency and honesty about
the enterprise's activities, challenges, and outcomes. Ensure that operations, financial
transactions, and impact claims are transparent to stakeholders, customers, and
investors.
Clear Communication: Regularly communicate the social venture's progress,
challenges, and successes with all stakeholders, including investors, donors,
beneficiaries, and the general public. This can be done through reports, social media,
newsletters, and community engagement efforts.
Brand Management: Develop a strong, authentic brand that reflects the social
venture's mission, values, and impact. Being consistent in messaging across all
platforms and maintaining a reputation for delivering on promises will build long-
term trust.
Crisis Communication Plan: Develop a plan for addressing potential crises or
negative events, such as a failure in the enterprise’s social programs, controversy over
business practices, or data breaches. A well-prepared communication strategy will
help mitigate reputational damage.
Social enterprises must ensure they comply with legal and regulatory requirements in both
their social and business operations. Failure to do so can result in legal disputes, penalties, or
even shutdowns.
Strategies:
Understanding Legal Obligations: Social enterprises need to understand the legal
landscape surrounding their operations. This includes compliance with local laws, tax
regulations, nonprofit and business registration requirements, and employment laws.
Contracts and Agreements: Ensure all contracts with partners, employees, suppliers,
and customers are legally sound and protect the enterprise’s interests. This includes
drafting clear terms and conditions, ensuring intellectual property rights are protected,
and understanding liabilities.
Social Impact Reporting Standards: In some cases, social enterprises may be
required to report on their impact and outcomes. Familiarize yourself with
international standards like the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) or local
regulations on social impact reporting to ensure compliance.
Legal Counsel: Consult with legal professionals, particularly those familiar with the
social enterprise sector, to mitigate legal risks and protect the organization from
potential litigation.
Social enterprises face market risks, such as changes in customer demand, competition, or
market conditions, which can impact revenue and long-term sustainability. Unlike traditional
businesses, social ventures often serve underserved markets, making them more vulnerable to
market fluctuations.
Strategies:
The success of a social enterprise heavily relies on the people behind it. Employee turnover,
talent gaps, or inadequate leadership can significantly affect the operations and performance
of a social venture.
Strategies:
Social enterprises can also face risks from political instability, changes in government
policies, or global events like pandemics, natural disasters, or economic downturns.
Strategies:
Conclusion
Effective risk management is essential for the long-term success and sustainability of social
enterprises. By addressing financial, operational, reputational, legal, and social impact risks,
social ventures can navigate challenges more effectively and continue to achieve their
mission. A comprehensive and proactive approach to risk management helps social
enterprises protect themselves from unforeseen setbacks and ensures they can maximize their
positive impact on society.
The legal framework governing social ventures is essential to ensuring that social
enterprises can operate effectively, stay compliant with regulations, and maintain their social
impact goals. Social ventures, which are organizations that blend social missions with
business practices, are subject to a combination of corporate law, tax regulations,
nonprofit law, and specific laws related to their social objectives. The legal structure and
frameworks they choose have profound implications on their operations, funding sources, and
how they report impact.
Below is an overview of the key elements of the legal framework governing social ventures:
Social ventures typically operate under different legal structures, which influence their
governance, financial operations, and social mission. These structures often fall into two
broad categories: for-profit and nonprofit, with some hybrid models existing in between.
A. Nonprofit Organization
Nonprofits are entities that do not distribute profits to owners or shareholders but reinvest any
surplus into their social mission. They are primarily focused on addressing social issues and
often have access to tax exemptions, grants, and donations.
For-profit social ventures operate like traditional businesses but prioritize social impact
alongside profitability. They are structured as companies that pay taxes but are dedicated to
achieving social outcomes.
Legal Considerations: For-profit ventures must comply with corporate laws related
to business registration, operations, tax filings, and employee benefits.
Taxation: These ventures are subject to standard corporate tax rates and regulations.
They can raise capital through investors, venture capital, or loans, and distribute
profits to shareholders.
B Corporation Status: In some jurisdictions, for-profit enterprises can apply for B
Corporation (B Corp) certification, a third-party certification for companies that
meet rigorous standards of social and environmental performance, accountability, and
transparency.
Example: Companies like Patagonia and Ben & Jerry's are B Corporations, which means
they balance profit-making with a commitment to environmental and social goals.
C. Hybrid Models
Hybrid models combine elements of both for-profit and nonprofit structures. These structures
allow social enterprises to access the benefits of both worlds: the flexibility and funding
mechanisms of for-profit businesses and the social mission focus of nonprofits.
Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C): A specific hybrid model in the U.S.
that is structured as a for-profit company but is designed to achieve a social purpose.
The L3C allows social enterprises to pursue both a profit and a social mission, and
can attract foundation funding (which is typically reserved for nonprofits).
Social Purpose Corporation (SPC): This is another hybrid legal form available in
certain U.S. states, which blends aspects of a for-profit corporation with an emphasis
on a social mission. Unlike traditional corporations, SPCs must legally incorporate
social or environmental objectives into their business model.
In the UK, the Community Interest Company (CIC) is a specific legal form designed for
social enterprises. CICs are regulated by the Regulator of Community Interest Companies,
ensuring that the social mission remains at the forefront.
Regardless of their legal structure, social ventures are subject to a variety of laws and
regulations that govern their activities. Below are some of the key laws that apply to social
enterprises:
Nonprofit Tax Exemption: In countries like the United States, Canada, and the UK,
nonprofit organizations can apply for tax-exempt status, meaning they don’t pay
corporate taxes on income used to further their mission. In the U.S., this is governed
by Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).
Social Enterprise Tax Incentives: Some jurisdictions provide tax incentives for
businesses that prioritize social or environmental goals. For example, in the U.S., B
Corps are eligible for some state-level tax breaks or incentives designed to support
businesses with positive social impact.
Value-Added Tax (VAT) and Sales Tax: Depending on the nature of the products or
services provided, social ventures may be required to charge and remit VAT or sales
taxes, especially if they operate in the consumer goods sector.
Social ventures must comply with employment and labor laws, which cover areas such as
worker rights, minimum wage, benefits, and safety standards.
Social ventures, particularly those that seek tax-exempt status or funding from foundations
and impact investors, may be required to provide detailed reports on their social impact and
financial status.
Social ventures, particularly those that collect sensitive data (e.g., from donors, customers, or
beneficiaries), must comply with data protection laws.
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): In Europe, the GDPR sets strict rules
on data privacy for organizations that collect personal data, ensuring individuals have
control over their information.
Data Security: Social enterprises must implement policies to protect customer,
donor, and beneficiary data from breaches or unauthorized access.
3. Funding Regulations
Access to funding is critical for the sustainability of social ventures. Social enterprises may
seek funds from a variety of sources, each of which is governed by specific regulations.
A. Grant Regulations
Nonprofit social enterprises or those with tax-exempt status may apply for grants from
foundations, government bodies, or other donors. Grants often come with specific rules and
regulations about how the funds can be spent and how the grantee must report progress.
Accountability: Grant recipients must typically demonstrate how they are using the
funds to achieve social outcomes and meet reporting requirements.
Social enterprises seeking investment from impact investors or social impact bonds may be
subject to different regulations depending on the type of funding.
Social Impact Bonds (SIBs): These are performance-based contracts where private
investors provide upfront funding for social projects and are repaid by the government
or other payers based on the project’s success. The legal structure for managing SIBs
varies depending on the country.
Investor Reporting: Social ventures receiving impact investments are often required
to demonstrate both financial returns and social impact in regular reports.
Conclusion
The legal framework for social ventures is multifaceted and depends on the specific
structure and goals of the organization. Social enterprises may choose to register as nonprofit
organizations, for-profit businesses, or hybrid models like B Corporations or Community
Interest Companies. Regardless of structure, they are subject to a range of laws including tax
regulations, labor laws, and transparency requirements, all of which help govern their ability
to balance financial sustainability with social impact. Understanding and complying with
these legal frameworks is crucial for the long-term success of social ventures.