0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views2 pages

Tabel PBP Jayanthi

Uploaded by

Nicky Afrillia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views2 pages

Tabel PBP Jayanthi

Uploaded by

Nicky Afrillia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Jayanthi and Damayanti / Journal of Business and Management, Vol.4, No.

5, 2015: 594-605

3 2025 -1181093407
4 2026 -1082652712
5 2027 -970009344.1
6 2028 -854327024.4
7 2029 -735440223.3
8 2030 -613195532.3
9 2031 -487439136.8
10 2032 -372222391.1
11 2033 -266730570.5
12 2034 -170210244.7
13 2035 -81964711.73
14 2036 -1349770.174
15 2037 72230194.7
16 2038 139325833.9
17 2039 200446189
18 2040 256061796.7
19 2041 306607563.8
20 2042 352485427.6
Table 4.15 PBP Calculation

The payback period shown above is in 14,018 years. Which means the project will get a payback on 14
years, 6 days.

Conclusion and Recommendation

Conclusion of Revenue and Capital Structure


Based on the revenue data, the revenue from the container handling can cover the cash outflow gained
from operation cost, which is good because it makes profitability for the investment. For the capital
structure proportion IPC will use 30% Equity and 70% Debt. Cash flow of the project is in good
performance, because the cash inflow still could counterbalance the cash outflow even though the
revenue is fixed stagnant and the cash outflow is increasing per year.

Conclusion Market Analysis


In conclusion, from the market analysis it is a great opportunity to do the project, as the demand is
already high and Indonesia have a great chance to grow its economy and industry from the maritime
field.

Conclusion of Net Present Value Analysis


According to NPV calculation at previous chapter, the NPV is greater than zero, it makes that NPV has
fulfilled the success criteria. NPV calculation of New Priok Port Project Phase 2 generates a good
number, which is US$352,485,427.58. As the NPV analysis fulfilled the criteria, the project is feasible.
Conclusion of Internal Rate of Return Analysis
The IRR calculation generates a number of 10.64%, which is over numbered the discount rate of IPC (dF
= 8%). Therefore, the IRR calculation of New Priok Port Project Phase 2 is compatible with the success

604
Jayanthi and Damayanti / Journal of Business and Management, Vol.4, No.5, 2015: 594-605

criteria that is must overcome the discount rate. As the IRR analysis fulfilled the criteria, the project is
feasible.
Conclusion of Payback Period
The payback period of New Priok Port Project Phase 2 is 14,018 years from the date the project started.
This number shows a good result considering the economic value of the project that is 20 years. As the
payback period is sooner than the economic value for operating period is a success criterion, the project
is feasible.
Conclusion of The Project Analysis
From the four aspects above of Revenue and Capital Structure, Net Present Value, Internal Rate of
Return, and Payback Period, the New Priok Port Project Phase 2 is feasible, and suggested to be
conducted.
Recommendation
From the conclusion above, the New Priok Port Project Phase 2 is economically feasible and suggested
to be conducted by IPC. So, the New Priok Port Project Phase 2 can contributed for company in
generate profit, fulfill the demand, and become a trigger for IPC to be a world-class port operator.

605

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy